What do you mean good sir? I get 4k60 stable on my gaming rig with RTX 2080ti OC and with Raytracing enabled in most games. Only Metro Exodus was giving me hard time and had to tone down couple of settings but still enjoying 4K60fps. And well BF V with RTX detail set to ultra can still melt even this graphics card but other than that. 4K60 is the new default
TheKasikaasu 4K 60 is not the ‘new default’ in order to get that you need to spend $1000+ on a gaming PC. Consoles are supposed to be relatively affordable and so its odd that developers are pushing for 4K when we simply aren’t at a point where 4K is affordable. The PS5 and Xbox Two should focus on 1080p 60 fps and that way we could get an entire generation of 60 fps games with textures improving over time rather than resolution. Then the PS6 and Xbox Three or whatever they call it can do 4K 60 fps
The Baby Eating Bishop of Bath and Wells little different, since it’s a fictional place and made up word, and people still try to say it the “correct way”
I just want a video with Alex playing the guitar next to his Crysis shrine saying german words from Wolfenstein. Randomly saying Wolfenstein in between the others in a agreeing manner as he plays calming tunes.
Interesting, it seems Nin could have done something to the clocks. People are also reporting that their Fire Emblem Three Houses burns through the Accu extremely fast too. Please take a further look at it Digital Foundry :) I hope Nin enables higher clockspeeds (especially with the new Switch models)
Thanks guys. It’s fun and pretty good looking. Not regretting the 30 bucks. Couple of complaints, though (X1X). No HDR. Such a shame. And no toggle for the film grain effect! Ugh. Some people love it, some people hate it. I hate it. Ha.
@@H.E.M. It's not bad, people are just ass clowns. I'm having a blast playing it through on pc with my brother. Anyone who says it's one of the worst games of the year, have clearly never played a truly bad game.
@@osskeet but this is only a spin-off, that cost half of the price of normal game. If its a full price game, i will be angry. But its rather a DLC with coop to New Colossus,
I wouldn't willingly choose it, but the Switch version is very impressive yet again. It really is a shame that the switch got stuck with the 2 worst entries in the rebooted Wolf series, a port of TNO and TOB would be lovely.
I really feel like people don't know what terrible games are anymore. It's not game of the year but it's definitely not some Superman 64 level monstrosity either. It's fun enough, worth $30
@@Clay3613 that honestly might be it which it's kinda lame because so far it's politics don't go much deeper than "fuck Nazis". The moment to moment gameplay is just order and Colossus with a bit of exploration and leveling up involved. Overall I'd recommend it, like you really can't do much better for a brand new release at $30
Such a shame when most people talk nowadays when it comes to gaming is "4k 60 fps HDR-Ray Tracing RtX Teraflops" shenanigans wherein they are not really enjoying the game itself but rather they feel superior when shaming other people who can't afford better PC rigs or just people who have different tastes on how they want to play their game like on switch.. No wonder EA still survives since Once they show a fcking realistic trailer of their games with the latest graphics card and God rays, Shader and dynamic shadow without even looking at the quality of content it has inside people will still buy it.. Because gamer nowadays are Btches when it come to realistic graphics..
720p on Switch not even 1080p still 30FPS and it still drops from there and the game obviously looks far lower quality. I don't remember any AAA games on PS3 that have blurry textures like what we're seeing here and Switch has loads more memory than PS3 or Xbox 360. Geometry on Switch wasn't discussed but obviously there have been cutbacks there as well. The New Colossus looked like it might have had better textures on Switch than W:YB. It's interesting that this game is on Switch but I think as usual the cost was too high. The game runs poorly and looks like a blurry mess due to a far lower baseline resolution and possible temporal reconstruction techniques used to boost resolution further. People are upset about 1080p60 when the current generation base systems can at least get close with far greater visual flair than Switch ever could. The problem is that Switch is far newer more expensive and yet far less capable hardware that's already more than totally tapped out as Doom Wolfenstein II and most recently Young Blood all show. Switch unsurprisingly also ran "Red Faction Guerrilla: Remarstered" pretty poorly in quality mode when docked and with frame pacing issues when in handheld mode. Performance mode in that game offers better FPS than last generation in select instances in handheld mode but in docked mode the resolution seems to infringe on the performance advantages compared to last generation though Switch does run with v-sync enabled. I suspect that asynchronous computer is used on Switch but probably not on PS4/Pro and Xbox One/S/X as performance is degraded significantly and not just when alpha effects are present, but when buildings are falling apart. PS4 and Xbox One are older less expensive and more feature complete and on top of that all they now both offer remote gaming functionality. Meanwhile my phone can also play a lot of 3rd party Switch games the same as Switch does or better - on a strickly computational level - with slightly to significantly better battery longevity to boot.
@@alinepiroutek8932 Not at all comparisons with Google Pixel C are pretty straightforward seeing as how it's around $300 (if you can still find a new unit) is outfitted with the exact same Tegra X1 SoC inside Switch and runs on Android obviously. Still allegedly more powerful than Switch due to having less restrictions on GPU and CPU clock speeds. So even in the se proce bracket using the exact same brains Switch is worse. Even so you still need a phone to socialize in many Switch titles (because Nintendo is stupid) Netflix and web browsing aren't available on Switch but hey at least there's a UA-cam app now... That destroys you Switch's battery unlike any other smartphone. At any rate if you play some games on hardware at least as powerful as the Galaxy S8 you may see better visuals and/or frame rates in Android games. Recently I've been pushing my phone beyond that 4-5 hors and even beyond that 8 hour magic ceiling Swtch cannot best on my cellphone and I have! See most cellphones use super high resolution screens and some titles don't limit resolutions meaning some games may run at native screen resolutions. For some modern phone games that could mean titles trying to run at 4K60! That is exactly what used to happen with Minecraft on My Galaxy S8 (2960x1440x60) until updating to Android 9 which sadly doesn't play nice with Samsung's own _"Game Tuner."_ Even so the newer versions of Minecraft on the S8 might still run at a comparable resolution to Switch or better plus you still get better draw distances than Switch with custom levels that run better than they do on Switch allegedly. Oddly DF shows Switch performance is nigh on flawless but many users report otherwise but oddly there aren't many videos that show these issues on YT for some reason. Exploited Switch's can run Minecraft with further draw distances allegedly but in my experimentation with Shield TV expanding the draw distance didn't actually result in a farther draw distance somehow even on the most recent version of Minecraft... Not sure why but draw distance cutoff was handled differently on Shield TV compared to other Android devices, instead of fading blocks there is a harsh solid wipe. Anyway 24 chunks is the limit for exploited Switch's as I was told but that was a tall order even on Shield TV and as I mentioned the visible draw distance isn't actually changed. It's also how I discovered that yes indeed Minecraft is exactly the same game underneath all the console, PC and mobile application arbitration which all seems very light on the face of it. There are other possibly less taxing Android games I've been testing that run at 60hz on mobile, Switch, PS4, Xbox One, PS Vita and PC. So far as I have gathered PC still cuts out victories in visuals, but performance is actually degraded in a very distinct way compared to gaming systems and mobile in the titles I'm still testing now despite their age. My PC is no slouch either. It's specs GTX 1070 8GB, 16GB DDR4 2.4Ghz, Core i7 7700HQ. Even though it's a laptop its power ceiling should still be slightly above Xbox One X but these games that I thought were mobile only cause issues on my PC even when played at low resolution 1280x720 and low settings (which appear to output lower quality visuals than even the mobile and PS Vita versions).
I hope you go and compare the ps3/360 versions of TNO with the switch ports. People forget TNO was a cross gen game and still shooting for 60 fps on the older consoles.
Funfact: Youngblood is the first game that has nazi symbolism in Germany. You can buy both the german and international version. Why? No idea but there are both.
I wonder why Panicbutton does not pin 1080 vertical lines and uses temporal reconstruction only on horizontal lines ranging from 240 to 480 lines dynamically and scaling with Sharpening. I think it would give a better look than reduce the component by maintaining the ratio of image. 480×1080=518,400pixels 1024×640=655,360pixels The way they are doing the rendered image is Resampleed from 640 to 720 lines and then your TV will do the work of Upscalar 720 lines for something bigger. The result is this persistent blur
The "Nazi Symbols" are allowed in Games in Germany, because Games are art. But they have to be checked by the "USK". In Germany you can get the International Version and the German Version. And as a German it is funny to hear you saying Wolfenstein :D
@@GodhandPlusOne wow what ist your problem? You only know the Hitler thing about Germany and say that everyone in Germany is a Nazi? Did you not pay attention in history lessons? You really believe that everyone has thought like Hitler or?
@@Jdoe-eu5yw It's 60 fps on all consoles, even the switch. But the switch version does have a lot of drops in some areas and I've heard the PS4 drops frames too. That shouldn't be happening on a game this old especially on PS4.
@@TexelGuy it's a $10 game that was shadow dropped. If you think the dev put the optimization effort needed to get it to run perfectly you're an idiot.
I thought the Switch version was running at a better resolution than Wolf 2. Glad to see I was correct with your analysis. I'd be interested to see that in depth video Richard was talking about with the Switch version
The framerate is definitely worse than Wolf 2 though. Seems to be consistently under 30fps under any combat scene. Honestly I would've preferred a lower resolution if it fixed those drops. Wolf 2 on ver.1.2 ran very stable and held up surprisingly well in most combat scenes.
@@VexAcer Wolf 2 took two patches to get there. In fact, most of the bigger open world areas ran absolutely terribly. Especially the New Orleans area. So, we'll see if a next patch drops to fix remaining performance issues.
I don't know if it's my 1080p 100 Hz TV showing its age but I much prefer 4K modes on the Xbox One X. Even though it's only Super Sampled I can really tell the difference. I have a FreeSync monitor so I'll see how that holds up.
Renato Ramos de Oliveira Correia I still think doom is better than both wolfensteins. That game despite its occasional drops in frame rate. Looks much more sharp and the texture res isn’t soup. The weapons look great in your hands
@@trentoinsano Doom is a way better port than wolf 2 and youngblood on switch, even after patches. It has better resolution, framerate, and just looks much better. Panic button definitely didn't give it their all in the wolfenstein ports, so I'm hoping doom eternal is equal to that at the least and an improvement at best.
@jvalex18 It is an effort problem though, the more time they would've had, the more effort they would've put in. I'm not saying they're lazy, but that they didn't put enough effort into it, and that's exactly what that means.
The game runs pretty good on the Switch, it got patched and improves a lot. Actually is a really good game and be able to play this game on the go is amazing.
@@teehundeart doesn't really matter, farcry is 4k 30 and it plays just fine. I would rather have better resolution, than shooting at blurry stuff. Battlefield V looks amazing and it runs at a higher FPS.
Sorry for the off topic question, but will you guys be doing a video of the doom ports just released for modern consoles? I got the PS4 version of doom 3which runs at a pretty locked 60fps, but the switch version appears to slow down at times and the anti-aliasing appears to be lower quality. Also the DRM is kinda strange. DF retro episode by any chance?
It’s crazy that 2015 portable graphics hardware is able to run and go toe to toe with the ‘pro’ consoles in 2018 to begin with. Having this on a handheld wins this for me :)
Man Panic Button deserve praise for bringing these games to switch players, even though it looks blurry and the resolution is bad, just being able to play games like this on the go is great for the switch. If I had to pick a console to buy it would be switch. PC gamer her btw
The problem is how do you spend your 500 dollars? Do you include used parts or only parts that you can buy off the shelf? I think prices and availability of components are too unreliable to make a fair comparison
@@kainthetrollreaver9270 lol these comparisons are not competitions on which hardware can run a game best for the same cost, all the consoles cost different amounts. When they do an analysis of the PC version why would they use a budget PC? People want to know how the game runs on a proper gaming PC, if you want to know how they run on a budget PC then there are plenty of videos with games running on specific rigs
And ll, for one you most likely posted a comment that probably had nothing to do with the topic of a fictional game set in an alternate reality, for no other reason other than to get a kick out of "triggering" people
Good thing they overclocked those jaguar cores for the x! What a blunder. They couldn't even master 1080p 60. Anyway, this game should be 1440p on the x. Aggressive scaling on new colossus helped the framerate, but those res shifts even when standing still in the homebase area were annoying AF
lol wishful thinking mate, such an xbox fanboy. Don't get me wrong, One X is usually better than PS4 Pro. But not so much in this game due to bad performance
This game is just so much better on PC, these consoles are really starting to show their age, PC versions are becoming far more detailed much like they did near the last years of the PS3 and Xbox 360, of course those consoles lasted a decade, which is far longer than most generations, usually it is about 5 years between console generations. Once PS5 and the next Xbox are out, they'll be releasing updated versions of a lot of games made near the end of these consoles life.
@@user-qi7uy4jz3y That's kind of the point of these videos, comparing hardware of different levels, so yes I am 100% comparing them, just like hundreds of UA-camrs do every damn day lol.
@@nighttimestalker I actually run a RX 580, great card, but time to upgrade to a 5700XT imo, the 580 still chews through most games at 1440p though, it just goes to show how much these consoles are showing their age, the fact they use old AMD Jaguar CPUs is no doubt a huge factor in the inability to run games at 60 fps on these consoles. I guess we can at least count on the next PS and Xbox to use Ryzen, that will get rid of any issues with CPU bottlenecking.
how do the important consoles compete? the switch is an interesting oddity but less relevant for many gamers. Which enhanced console should i consider this title on?
Those "rpg" mechanics are outrageous, and calling that crap RPG makes no sense either, it's nothing like a "ROLE PLAYING GAME", this is just the generic ass gameplay overlay uninspired devs put on games that simply don't work with them
Christ I’m desperate for a Switch Pro. If they could get it to Xbox One S level I’d be happy, at base PS4 I’d happily pay over a 1,000. I’d wager that PS4 Pro level performance just isn’t currently attainable in a handheld regardless of price without having a 10 minute batter life
The solution would be a Switch as powerful as a PS4, but with a dock that adds additional power so that it gets to the level of the PS4 Pro or Xbox One X. The special dock would be optional and could be bought separately to keep the cost of the console in an acceptable margin.
@@toddbot7545 Yes, Razer actually released a kind of box to connect a desktop PC graphics card to a laptop. You just put your card into the box, connect it through USB type c with a laptop and it works perfectly fine. The USB is obviously a faster version than the one from the current Switch, but being type c makes it just as suitable for a future version of the console.
![How Does Wolfenstein: Youngblood Compare to Previous Wolfensteins? [Spoilers]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kvINeAlslSs/mqdefault.jpg)
I hate the fact that nearly everybody wants 4k native resolution, but we can't perfect 1080p 60fps
Exactly that is the reason why i have sold my consoles
I agree, let's try and perfect 1080p 60fps that PCs have been doing since last gen.
What do you mean good sir? I get 4k60 stable on my gaming rig with RTX 2080ti OC and with Raytracing enabled in most games. Only Metro Exodus was giving me hard time and had to tone down couple of settings but still enjoying 4K60fps. And well BF V with RTX detail set to ultra can still melt even this graphics card but other than that. 4K60 is the new default
@@TheKasikaasu did you read and comprehend anything in this thread before typing your comment
TheKasikaasu 4K 60 is not the ‘new default’ in order to get that you need to spend $1000+ on a gaming PC. Consoles are supposed to be relatively affordable and so its odd that developers are pushing for 4K when we simply aren’t at a point where 4K is affordable. The PS5 and Xbox Two should focus on 1080p 60 fps and that way we could get an entire generation of 60 fps games with textures improving over time rather than resolution. Then the PS6 and Xbox Three or whatever they call it can do 4K 60 fps
My favorite DF arc is everyone learning the German Wolfenstein pronunciation from Alex.
Lol
He says Wulfenstein, even though it should be Wolfenstein. I'm baffled that he didn't pronounce it in German.
@@pandasdreamlygon aber wer sagt Wulfenstein statt Wolfenstein
@@pandasdreamlygon aber das kapieren die meisten nicht, die denken es ist deutsch und richtig :(
Its schtein
This is the first Wolfenstein available uncut in Germany.
But only at onlinestores !
Really ?
@@JunKurosu yes, only at online stores. Im from germany.
Spoggi99 wolfenstein un-circumcised edition :)
@@JunKurosu
Well yea there are 2 version to download the German version and the international version.
Ah yes the good ole censored German version with fidget spinners instead of Swastikas.
Well that's one way of putting it
And the Nazis also have a different name in the German version, so pathetic.
And in wolfenstein 2 they removed Hitlers beard.....fucking ridiculous
@@postscriptum8142 you can buy now the original Version too in Germany
Where’s Alex Battaglia so you can overdub his voice for pronouncing vhoulfenschtein each time in this video?
atomicbrain9401 please, no, I hate his smug ass.
Mike Saying dislike would be better than saying hate.
It's still wrong though 😕
mbsfaridi no it wouldn’t.
Mike Why so mean?
cant wait for doom 1,2,3 on switch video!!
What's a swith?
@@chimpmeister23 SWITCH
I love how this whole video is just making fun of Alex
Pan me too, I’m glad they realize how ridiculous he sounds.
@@bizzzzzzle even in German it sounds ridiculous, like seriously, the pronunciation is off.
The Baby Eating Bishop of Bath and Wells little different, since it’s a fictional place and made up word, and people still try to say it the “correct way”
Richard chuckling everytime they say "Vulfenshtain"
Thanks for the spelling, it helps me as I try to say it.
@@rockapartie
1st or 2nd O?
@@rockapartie which o?
Leave it to the German member of the DF team to remind us of the correct way of saying "Wolfenstein"
Volfenschtein
wulfenschwanz
Is he German?
"Wulfenstein" isn't correct
I just want a video with Alex playing the guitar next to his Crysis shrine saying german words from Wolfenstein. Randomly saying Wolfenstein in between the others in a agreeing manner as he plays calming tunes.
Always feel at home when I hear John say “I am joined by my good friend and colleague Richard” or vice versa! 🤗
Waited for this. Are you also going to be tackling Gears 5, One vs X?
how bout you wait til it comes out.
mjxbox, there’s a multiplayer beta that is available for comparison.
@@mjxbox Who rattled your cage?!
There really shouldn't be a comparison between the 2 there is no contest. Like this comparison
- MightySpriteKnight - But why would you want it tested before it's fully optimised ?
Love the map layouts. Feels a lot like Dishonored with Co Op. Love it!
Interesting, it seems Nin could have done something to the clocks. People are also reporting that their Fire Emblem Three Houses burns through the Accu extremely fast too. Please take a further look at it Digital Foundry :) I hope Nin enables higher clockspeeds (especially with the new Switch models)
That would be hard. Even without overclocking, Fortnite heated up my switch enough to cause cracks everywhere.
@@Sh-hg8kfnot console fault... The new Mariko consoles doesnt heat at all
Thanks guys. It’s fun and pretty good looking. Not regretting the 30 bucks. Couple of complaints, though (X1X). No HDR. Such a shame. And no toggle for the film grain effect! Ugh. Some people love it, some people hate it. I hate it. Ha.
I was gonna buy it but I keep hearing is bad. Ima wait for a sale.
@@H.E.M. It's not bad, people are just ass clowns. I'm having a blast playing it through on pc with my brother. Anyone who says it's one of the worst games of the year, have clearly never played a truly bad game.
@@ryuaga i'm pretty sure 95% of those people didn't event played the game itself. many times "npc" meme reflects reality more than irony.
Beside the internet hate, i really enjoy this game so far. Maybe daughters are not the best heroes i saw in games, but the gameplay is awesome
That's a shame. It's people like you that allow developers to make half assed games and put them out.
@@osskeet but this is only a spin-off, that cost half of the price of normal game. If its a full price game, i will be angry. But its rather a DLC with coop to New Colossus,
I’m enjoying the game too. It’s fun.
I wouldn't willingly choose it, but the Switch version is very impressive yet again.
It really is a shame that the switch got stuck with the 2 worst entries in the rebooted Wolf series, a port of TNO and TOB would be lovely.
It might be impressive, but still garbage nonetheless. Like most Switch version of multiplatform games.
TNC wasn’t that bad imo. It was fun but for sure not as good as the first two.
The Switch version is far from "impressive", it looks like garbage.
The game itself is horrible (imo), but boy does it look good. Runs like a dream on PC too.
I thought the forced co-op thing died last gen with the Army of Two games.
I really feel like people don't know what terrible games are anymore. It's not game of the year but it's definitely not some Superman 64 level monstrosity either. It's fun enough, worth $30
@@creativeusername6453 These people are likely mad the politics of the game doesn't align with theirs.
@@Clay3613 that honestly might be it which it's kinda lame because so far it's politics don't go much deeper than "fuck Nazis". The moment to moment gameplay is just order and Colossus with a bit of exploration and leveling up involved. Overall I'd recommend it, like you really can't do much better for a brand new release at $30
please try it with overclock switch to see how high it can get in stable resolution and framerate !
Great as always.
Hope we get something on the Doom 3 release on all platforms
Such a shame when most people talk nowadays when it comes to gaming is "4k 60 fps HDR-Ray Tracing RtX Teraflops" shenanigans wherein they are not really enjoying the game itself but rather they feel superior when shaming other people who can't afford better PC rigs or just people who have different tastes on how they want to play their game like on switch..
No wonder EA still survives since Once they show a fcking realistic trailer of their games with the latest graphics card and God rays, Shader and dynamic shadow without even looking at the quality of content it has inside people will still buy it.. Because gamer nowadays are Btches when it come to realistic graphics..
720p on Switch not even 1080p still 30FPS and it still drops from there and the game obviously looks far lower quality.
I don't remember any AAA games on PS3 that have blurry textures like what we're seeing here and Switch has loads more memory than PS3 or Xbox 360.
Geometry on Switch wasn't discussed but obviously there have been cutbacks there as well.
The New Colossus looked like it might have had better textures on Switch than W:YB.
It's interesting that this game is on Switch but I think as usual the cost was too high. The game runs poorly and looks like a blurry mess due to a far lower baseline resolution and possible temporal reconstruction techniques used to boost resolution further.
People are upset about 1080p60 when the current generation base systems can at least get close with far greater visual flair than Switch ever could. The problem is that Switch is far newer more expensive and yet far less capable hardware that's already more than totally tapped out as Doom Wolfenstein II and most recently Young Blood all show.
Switch unsurprisingly also ran "Red Faction Guerrilla: Remarstered" pretty poorly in quality mode when docked and with frame pacing issues when in handheld mode. Performance mode in that game offers better FPS than last generation in select instances in handheld mode but in docked mode the resolution seems to infringe on the performance advantages compared to last generation though Switch does run with v-sync enabled.
I suspect that asynchronous computer is used on Switch but probably not on PS4/Pro and Xbox One/S/X as performance is degraded significantly and not just when alpha effects are present, but when buildings are falling apart.
PS4 and Xbox One are older less expensive and more feature complete and on top of that all they now both offer remote gaming functionality.
Meanwhile my phone can also play a lot of 3rd party Switch games the same as Switch does or better - on a strickly computational level - with slightly to significantly better battery longevity to boot.
Switch is $300 15W machine. Try to compare with expensive phones or 100W machines. Difficult to find one with both.
@@alinepiroutek8932
Not at all comparisons with Google Pixel C are pretty straightforward seeing as how it's around $300 (if you can still find a new unit) is outfitted with the exact same Tegra X1 SoC inside Switch and runs on Android obviously. Still allegedly more powerful than Switch due to having less restrictions on GPU and CPU clock speeds.
So even in the se proce bracket using the exact same brains Switch is worse. Even so you still need a phone to socialize in many Switch titles (because Nintendo is stupid) Netflix and web browsing aren't available on Switch but hey at least there's a UA-cam app now... That destroys you Switch's battery unlike any other smartphone.
At any rate if you play some games on hardware at least as powerful as the Galaxy S8 you may see better visuals and/or frame rates in Android games.
Recently I've been pushing my phone beyond that 4-5 hors and even beyond that 8 hour magic ceiling Swtch cannot best on my cellphone and I have!
See most cellphones use super high resolution screens and some titles don't limit resolutions meaning some games may run at native screen resolutions. For some modern phone games that could mean titles trying to run at 4K60! That is exactly what used to happen with Minecraft on My Galaxy S8 (2960x1440x60) until updating to Android 9 which sadly doesn't play nice with Samsung's own _"Game Tuner."_
Even so the newer versions of Minecraft on the S8 might still run at a comparable resolution to Switch or better plus you still get better draw distances than Switch with custom levels that run better than they do on Switch allegedly.
Oddly DF shows Switch performance is nigh on flawless but many users report otherwise but oddly there aren't many videos that show these issues on YT for some reason. Exploited Switch's can run Minecraft with further draw distances allegedly but in my experimentation with Shield TV expanding the draw distance didn't actually result in a farther draw distance somehow even on the most recent version of Minecraft... Not sure why but draw distance cutoff was handled differently on Shield TV compared to other Android devices, instead of fading blocks there is a harsh solid wipe.
Anyway 24 chunks is the limit for exploited Switch's as I was told but that was a tall order even on Shield TV and as I mentioned the visible draw distance isn't actually changed. It's also how I discovered that yes indeed Minecraft is exactly the same game underneath all the console, PC and mobile application arbitration which all seems very light on the face of it. There are other possibly less taxing Android games I've been testing that run at 60hz on mobile, Switch, PS4, Xbox One, PS Vita and PC. So far as I have gathered PC still cuts out victories in visuals, but performance is actually degraded in a very distinct way compared to gaming systems and mobile in the titles I'm still testing now despite their age. My PC is no slouch either. It's specs GTX 1070 8GB, 16GB DDR4 2.4Ghz, Core i7 7700HQ. Even though it's a laptop its power ceiling should still be slightly above Xbox One X but these games that I thought were mobile only cause issues on my PC even when played at low resolution 1280x720 and low settings (which appear to output lower quality visuals than even the mobile and PS Vita versions).
@@VariantAEC Exactly
I hope you go and compare the ps3/360 versions of TNO with the switch ports. People forget TNO was a cross gen game and still shooting for 60 fps on the older consoles.
Your point... It's a completely different game... Switch could also run it at 60fps
TNO is very different than TNC/YB though. Entirely different engine too
Funfact:
Youngblood is the first game that has nazi symbolism in Germany.
You can buy both the german and international version.
Why? No idea but there are both.
I'm playing this on Xbox One X, Love PS4 pro but only Sony's first party games look good on that console.
GameMasterpg I’m intrigued by your comment. Can you give le another example.
Very true
@@f3rns Xbox One X 4K, PS4 Pro 1440p. Me play the 4K version of game
@@f3rns example: final fantasy x/x2, final fantasy 15...
I wonder why Panicbutton does not pin 1080 vertical lines and uses temporal reconstruction only on horizontal lines ranging from 240 to 480 lines dynamically and scaling with Sharpening. I think it would give a better look than reduce the component by maintaining the ratio of image.
480×1080=518,400pixels
1024×640=655,360pixels
The way they are doing the rendered image is Resampleed from 640 to 720 lines and then your TV will do the work of Upscalar 720 lines for something bigger. The result is this persistent blur
👏👏👏👏
The "Nazi Symbols" are allowed in Games in Germany, because Games are art. But they have to be checked by the "USK". In Germany you can get the International Version and the German Version. And as a German it is funny to hear you saying Wolfenstein :D
@@GodhandPlusOne wow, don't you think they're allowed to have vivid memories about the whole thing? Jeez.
@@GodhandPlusOne wow what ist your problem? You only know the Hitler thing about Germany and say that everyone in Germany is a Nazi? Did you not pay attention in history lessons? You really believe that everyone has thought like Hitler or?
Look at the transition 1:45 (1:49). I would rather play the more crisp, 60 fps game, even if't low on polygons.
More saying "Wolfenstein" please 😅
Hänschen klein ging allein, in den nächsten Wolfenstein
Mr Sadface Volvenstein.
Guys, I've watched the video during dinner and you made It lovely with the "Wolfenshtein" speaking thing.
i just hope next gen nails 1440p 60fps. That would be a nice goal
If it as powerful as RX 5700XT it should be.
Mad props for the Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan cameo :D
Waiting for doom 3 if it have any enhancements....
lefte stali I downloaded it, not 4K but it looks like an upgrade from 360, more like the pc version
@@andybowers4096 look like 1080p or better?
@@Jdoe-eu5yw It's 60 fps on all consoles, even the switch. But the switch version does have a lot of drops in some areas and I've heard the PS4 drops frames too. That shouldn't be happening on a game this old especially on PS4.
@@TexelGuy it's a $10 game that was shadow dropped. If you think the dev put the optimization effort needed to get it to run perfectly you're an idiot.
@David P. current gen console cpu's are underpowered, the ps3 cell processor still kick ass the amd jaguar, ibm espresso and tegra x1
Super impressed with switch... still. If a switch pro ever becomes a reality it would be pretty interesting with a patch.
Wolfenstein : Full Fat Blood
I love your videos. I love more than you seem to have a great time chatting and doing them. Love you guys!
Was this reviewed with the Xbox patch that got released during the weekend?
Let's admit we all need Alex Battaglia in our life just to say Wolfenstein and Panzerhund from time to time.
I thought the Switch version was running at a better resolution than Wolf 2. Glad to see I was correct with your analysis. I'd be interested to see that in depth video Richard was talking about with the Switch version
The framerate is definitely worse than Wolf 2 though. Seems to be consistently under 30fps under any combat scene.
Honestly I would've preferred a lower resolution if it fixed those drops. Wolf 2 on ver.1.2 ran very stable and held up surprisingly well in most combat scenes.
@@VexAcer Wolf 2 took two patches to get there. In fact, most of the bigger open world areas ran absolutely terribly. Especially the New Orleans area. So, we'll see if a next patch drops to fix remaining performance issues.
It runs getter than wolfenstein 2,it's a better game period
@@VexAcer nah, youngbloods ran way better
This game is great on the switch! Big improvement over W2. The game feels so smooth on switch
Where's Van Cabbage? Claiming its 4k at a locked 60... The pro runs better than the X on all options, it even dips to the same 1440p as the pro...
I don't know if it's my 1080p 100 Hz TV showing its age but I much prefer 4K modes on the Xbox One X. Even though it's only Super Sampled I can really tell the difference. I have a FreeSync monitor so I'll see how that holds up.
Let's hope Doom Eternal's Switch port is more polished.
? But this is already better than the post patch doom and wolfenstein on switch.
Renato Ramos de Oliveira Correia I still think doom is better than both wolfensteins. That game despite its occasional drops in frame rate. Looks much more sharp and the texture res isn’t soup. The weapons look great in your hands
@@trentoinsano Doom is a way better port than wolf 2 and youngblood on switch, even after patches. It has better resolution, framerate, and just looks much better. Panic button definitely didn't give it their all in the wolfenstein ports, so I'm hoping doom eternal is equal to that at the least and an improvement at best.
@jvalex18 It is an effort problem though, the more time they would've had, the more effort they would've put in. I'm not saying they're lazy, but that they didn't put enough effort into it, and that's exactly what that means.
Holy fuck nintendo is in desperate need of switch 2.
Guys i love your videos. But it could be even better if you use some kind of De-esser on your voiceovers to soften the “s” sounds. 😊
MuZekTech - ssss.
@@threebedrooms1076 SSStoop!
I think you guys forgot to analyze the Portable Mode frame-rate
The game runs pretty good on the Switch, it got patched and improves a lot. Actually is a really good game and be able to play this game on the go is amazing.
Im most likley alone in this opinion but I think this game is really really fun. I love it. Its the best grinding loop In a shooter for awhile.
I am more interested in 4k visuals than fps.
In a shooting game?
teehundeart in campaign games
@@teehundeart doesn't really matter, farcry is 4k 30 and it plays just fine. I would rather have better resolution, than shooting at blurry stuff. Battlefield V looks amazing and it runs at a higher FPS.
I love that you make references to The Day Today in your videos.
Did you guys test the patched or launch version for switch?
patched version for sure. non patched version was like 19-25 fps
@@JaimeIsJaime true, but i asked because post patch the games seems way smoother than what this graph shows. Maybe its just my stupid brain.
Honestly I think they're reviewing the launch version
I believe they are using the launch version. They usually state on their videos if they are using a patch.
@@TheDonner000 They aren't reviewing anything in this video. Big difference between an analysis and a review.
We've all been waiting for this!!
25 FPS in a FPS game is like torture.
@Kool Klux Klan He said cinematic. Clearly he's a Sony guy
Where is all the Fire Emblem content I was anticipating this whole time? :(
I like how they giggle like schoolgirls everytime they said Wolfenstain with the german pronunciation.
Switch fps performance seems a little better than what's suggested in this video. Was the Switch footage taken before or after the patch?
It was taken before the patch.
@@mercenary621 How do you know this?
3:30
Nah, Wolfenstein 2 definitely held a solid 30 on Switch most of the time
After multiple patches, yes
AwkwrdW1llCmdy yeh, and that’s what he is comparing it too.
All he needed to say was RAYTRACING once or twice and he would've turned into Alex mid-video.
one x. what a beast! up to 60 fps... dips to 29. avg 40
Sorry for the off topic question, but will you guys be doing a video of the doom ports just released for modern consoles?
I got the PS4 version of doom 3which runs at a pretty locked 60fps, but the switch version appears to slow down at times and the anti-aliasing appears to be lower quality.
Also the DRM is kinda strange.
DF retro episode by any chance?
8:30 That's "some visual hit" alright!
It’s crazy that 2015 portable graphics hardware is able to run and go toe to toe with the ‘pro’ consoles in 2018 to begin with. Having this on a handheld wins this for me :)
I don't think you know what "toe to toe" means. It's blurry as hell on the Switch, missing graphical effects and runs at mid 20's.
So the PS4 Pro and Xbox One X are basically the same graphics.
No, Ps4 pro is inferior, like always.
@Transistor Jump You clearly didnt watch the video then. Ps4 pro is a great 1080p machine though.
@@ejs3589 Ignoring the fact that many games run worse on the X huh?
@@Clay3613 Lmao The ones that then were patched like a week after and solved the problems? 😂
Ps4 pro is a great 1080p machine though
Man Panic Button deserve praise for bringing these games to switch players, even though it looks blurry and the resolution is bad, just being able to play games like this on the go is great for the switch. If I had to pick a console to buy it would be switch. PC gamer her btw
This is definitely better looking than wolfenstein 2 on the switch.
Would you guys stop mocking Alex, please? He is a national treasure over at DF.
No. He's the worst member of the team by far.
Switch version is really horendous it looks far worst than wolf 2 on switch
That comparison of the faces is like a ps2 game.
Any video that references Day Today is a good video.
The Switch version is sponsored by LowSpecGamer
I was waiting for this one... DON'T spoil me, I know that Switch destroys the X1X but shhuuttt !!
Switch vs Xbox one x ????
I curious to know the sales numbers of doom and wolfenstein on switch because I love both games, but Id never buy them on switch
Digital foundry can you compare 500$ pc with Xbox one x because you are always compare a 3000$ pc with 500$ xbox one x
Thats because Digital Foundry are PS fanboys
The problem is how do you spend your 500 dollars? Do you include used parts or only parts that you can buy off the shelf? I think prices and availability of components are too unreliable to make a fair comparison
@@teehundeart well to tell the truth you can buy a XB1X for $300 new so it should be a new PC with new parts for $300
@@kainthetrollreaver9270 lol these comparisons are not competitions on which hardware can run a game best for the same cost, all the consoles cost different amounts. When they do an analysis of the PC version why would they use a budget PC? People want to know how the game runs on a proper gaming PC, if you want to know how they run on a budget PC then there are plenty of videos with games running on specific rigs
@@billygunn7713
He's just another dumbass
It will be interesting to see how this game runs in the new Switch revision if it does turn out it has slightly beefier specs.
No, it hast The Same Performance and Just more efficient Chip.
Below 720 on switch 😱
Really gotta respect bethesdas support of this system. Same day launches too.
I got banned on IGN for this post, "Women didn't win WW2."
That explains 2019 perfectly.
And ll, for one you most likely posted a comment that probably had nothing to do with the topic of a fictional game set in an alternate reality, for no other reason other than to get a kick out of "triggering" people
@@Sh-hg8kf
Thinking of Alex at home in his Crysis shrine, oblivious to all the attention here.
another blurry mess for the switch!..
well yeah... it's a 1GHZ tablet with Tegra mobile chip....
Honestly seems kind of pointless to compare these, like seriously
The fuck's Lady from DMC doing in that thumbnail lmao
Good thing they overclocked those jaguar cores for the x! What a blunder. They couldn't even master 1080p 60. Anyway, this game should be 1440p on the x. Aggressive scaling on new colossus helped the framerate, but those res shifts even when standing still in the homebase area were annoying AF
Looks and runs much better on Xbox One X.
Too blurry on ps4 pro.
You didn’t even watch the video, the Xbox runs like shit
@@JamieRobert_ he always says the same 💩 bro every video it's really pathetic tbh 🤣😂🤣😂
Ben Taylan PS4 pro actually runs better in this case lol
Dude have you actually watched the video ? X is under performing badly .
lol wishful thinking mate, such an xbox fanboy. Don't get me wrong, One X is usually better than PS4 Pro. But not so much in this game due to bad performance
Hope we get a video for fire emblem three houses soon, I’m curious how framerate and resolution hold up. Especially compared to the 3ds games.
This game is just so much better on PC, these consoles are really starting to show their age, PC versions are becoming far more detailed much like they did near the last years of the PS3 and Xbox 360, of course those consoles lasted a decade, which is far longer than most generations, usually it is about 5 years between console generations.
Once PS5 and the next Xbox are out, they'll be releasing updated versions of a lot of games made near the end of these consoles life.
You compare a pc to $500 console? Hhhhahhhhhh
@@user-qi7uy4jz3y That's kind of the point of these videos, comparing hardware of different levels, so yes I am 100% comparing them, just like hundreds of UA-camrs do every damn day lol.
@@user-qi7uy4jz3y
I mean an RX 580 can push 1440p medium settings (same as X) at 80+fps.....
You can build a PC around that GPU for like 500-600$
They showed it in their little discussion video they did on the game together.
One of them was using an RX 580. Unlocked his frame rate and got 80+
@@nighttimestalker I actually run a RX 580, great card, but time to upgrade to a 5700XT imo, the 580 still chews through most games at 1440p though, it just goes to show how much these consoles are showing their age, the fact they use old AMD Jaguar CPUs is no doubt a huge factor in the inability to run games at 60 fps on these consoles.
I guess we can at least count on the next PS and Xbox to use Ryzen, that will get rid of any issues with CPU bottlenecking.
That's why I have a PC. I mean...it's nice to play such games on the go, but not if the experience sacrifice so much.
I could see it coming out with a Patch like all games but you can't compare Xbox one X to Nintendo Switch switch it's apples to Oranges
Uh yea , comparing them shows you what sacrifices you making if you buy it for switch and if that's worth it to you , don't be butthurt
@@VaunShiz if you think that then you need to be sent to the Mental health Ward
how do the important consoles compete? the switch is an interesting oddity but less relevant for many gamers. Which enhanced console should i consider this title on?
x. done.
Although I own a Pro and not an X you should get it on the XB1X it's the best console for 3rd party games graphically and performance wise
Those "rpg" mechanics are outrageous, and calling that crap RPG makes no sense either, it's nothing like a "ROLE PLAYING GAME", this is just the generic ass gameplay overlay uninspired devs put on games that simply don't work with them
"Peter! You've lost the news!"
:)
Dont really need 60 fps on a singleplayer game.
Yes I do. The inconsistency is annoying as fuck
Glad to have a powerful PC
The suite textures on the switch look like sludge.
looks more like a snake skin than a metallic chain armor.
Christ I’m desperate for a Switch Pro. If they could get it to Xbox One S level I’d be happy, at base PS4 I’d happily pay over a 1,000.
I’d wager that PS4 Pro level performance just isn’t currently attainable in a handheld regardless of price without having a 10 minute batter life
The solution would be a Switch as powerful as a PS4, but with a dock that adds additional power so that it gets to the level of the PS4 Pro or Xbox One X. The special dock would be optional and could be bought separately to keep the cost of the console in an acceptable margin.
Luis Muñoz That’s actually an awesome idea, sort of like how eGPUs work for laptops but moulded to a dock.
@@polzol2 can you do that through usb c though?
That would be nice yall, but there is more to it then 'what we want'.
If they could they would.
@@toddbot7545 Yes, Razer actually released a kind of box to connect a desktop PC graphics card to a laptop. You just put your card into the box, connect it through USB type c with a laptop and it works perfectly fine. The USB is obviously a faster version than the one from the current Switch, but being type c makes it just as suitable for a future version of the console.
PS is best
This video is worth it to hear Richard giggle everytime they go Bataglia on the vulfenschtein pronunciation
Oh dear, Van Dammage must be crying into his pillow
Van damage owns an X he has nothing to cry about
@@pizzagateisreal lol good one!
They did a better job with this game than wolfenstein 2. This game feels good on switch last time I played it
VOLFENSCHTEIN!
Hell ya dude!