New Neighbor's Dog Digging Causes MAJOR Issues!! Judge Decides
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 чер 2024
- She's new to the town and has dogs that dig holes under the fence causing sharp angles that injure her neighbors small dog, her neighbors who have lived their 30 years are upset she won't help with their enormous vet bills.
CHAPTERS:
0:00 - Plaintiff Opening
5:18 - Plaintiff Witness Testimony
9:41 - Defendant Opening
13:28 - Fence Dispute
15:01 - Closing Arguments
16:29 - Judge’s Ruling
#judge #court #trending - Розваги
I LOVE this judge, he’s to the point, direct, but also takes no bs in a calm manner.
And nice too.
Canaday's husband was nodding in agreement with the plaintiff when she described the dogs digging and that Mr Canaday had said he wished the dogs didn't dig so much, and Mrs Canaday clearly nudged him to stop him agreeing. So she lied when she said the dogs didn't dig.
I own a 225 pound English Mastiff and a Pomeranian and they get along great and my Mastiff does not dig luckily.
It’s not the 🐶 but the owners who fail to properly train their dogs.
With you having a Mastiff & a Pom without any problems show you have done well with them and if your Pom
lying on top of the M sleeping is priceless !
Ha, that was a clever judgement. Not putting one side 100% at fault avoids further poisoning the neighbors' relationship (which seemed otherwise fairly okay) and thus probably serves everyone in the long run.
I love how this judge is attentive to details.
Except the part of the vet report he ignored
Maybe she should have built a short fence that was safer for HER DOGS, you know, her dogs her responsibility.
Odd... i kept thinking, how did the little dog get bitten?? There was no testimony that the big dogs ever went over into the neighbors yard. I was thinking, little dog probably was able to partially squeeze under fence barking at big dogs, and then got bitten... little dogs fault.
take that to the insurance company now that it is ruled the fence caused the injuries.
Feuding neighbours is never good. Life's to short.
Didn't the vet report state that the dog suffered bite injuries.... that tells you it was the dogs and not the fence.
Why should the plaintiffs maintain a fence that isn't theirs.
Exactly
Some fences are on the property line and become the responsibility of both parties.
I adopted a feral dog from a rescue...she would try to dig under the wood post/square wire fencing that is around my property. I bought some wood garden stakes and hammered them down, along the fence line in those spots she tried to dig and get under the fencing.
She Dug up the stakes. :P
Next step... I got some carpet scraps/sections, placed them upside down in those areas where she was digging. I put the carpet 'fuzzy side down' so the rough backing was facing upwards and I cut slits in it and pushed a few garden stakes into each of those sections of carpet, then hammered the stakes down.
It worked... my dog couldn't dig a hole through the rough backing of the carpet and so she also couldn't dig up the wooden stakes holding the carpet down : )
She finally gave up on digging holes to try to get out of the yard. She was a 75 pound dog, so it's not like she didn't have the 'umph' to put into her digging. I was pretty pleased my idea worked.
That's brilliant 👍👍
@@stanleyhape8427 Thank for reading that bit of lengthy writing, and thanks too for the reply.
BTW, I tucked about 2 or 3 inches of the carpet under the wire fencing so it was on the other side a tiny bit.
The stakes that went through the slits cut into the carpet were close, to the wire.(about 3 inches). On my side of the fencing the edge of the carpet was about 8 inches from the fence wire.
Putting the stakes close to the wire made it more difficult for Jaya, my feral dog, to push the wire with her head and try to dig into dirt directly under the fencing.
When I mowed the lawn the flat back side of the carpet wasn't getting into the lawn mower blade because the carpet was pinned own.
Eventually, grass clippings and dirt covered up the carpet sections and that also made it stay put, and be more camouflaged. Grass started to grow over the carpet a few years later.
Jaya eventually stopped her digging and went out and removed the stakes leaving the carpet in place, as it was pretty much embedded into the soil by that point. Can't even see where any of it is now. (7 years have gone by since I put the carpet down)
is this Pomeranian related to Mr. Puddles? #freemrpuddles
Poor Mr. Puddles
We need updates on Mr. Puddles! That poor dog needs to be rescued!
@@courtnerdsI feel like we should start a gofundme for Mr. Puddles to get his own place.
@@mamaburnham1so agree! That poor dog has been through hell!
Were the puns entirely necessarily necessary? 😂😂😂
Great judgement and really good idea that Construction method caused injury
Love the re-enactment, laughed heaps
Bravo to the puns. Totally on point.
Judge ahould have know with old people u need a lot more time cause they start at the beginning of time instead of just the facts. The judge was good at getting the facts out of these people.
But it may be important to know the breed of every dog the plaintiff has ever had to better understand why she has a Pomeranian now.
Your honor it all started when I was 6 years old...
~her probably
The Bunco reference was funny, and probably true.
Near the start, they talk about fence gaps, did they check if that is required by law?
I ask cause in my area there is a max height, min height, and if you have dips/holes in the yard you CANNOT underfill the fence line to make it "even." It is why everyone here has wavy fences, they have to allow for wildlife and water to pass through if it is natural. Even putting that orange barrier under the fence they talked about is enough to get a warning/removal notice.
I want to know what side of the fence were the big dogs on when the little one got bit? Also whose fence is it? Why don't they each have their own fence?
Great ruling. The Dane dogs did it, though.
This is BS. The plaintiffs had no duty to maintain their neighbors’ fence. The defendants should have been held solely responsible.
Plaintiffs have a duty to mitigate damages to the extent that they are aware of their potential. In this pursuit, they opted to collaborate on the maintenance of the fence. This was not their only remedy but it was the one they chose and therefore they assumed the risks of that remedy. The ruling is fair given the facts as assessed by the judge. If his factual assessment is incorrect, then that's another matter for which we do not have enough information to evaluate.
Anyone knows any other good court channels other than judges Simpsons,boyd, Middleton
“Our Nevada Judges”
@@dock_yard1149 yeah their videos like 4 or 5 minutes long
I’ve found several channels through Law Talk with Mike.
Go check out judge Alex Manning. She’s awesome.
I have a pitbull big baby .He gets walked alot those little dogs always try too get him .He is scared of them he's 80 pounds.But them little dogs think they are bigger .Now one is his friend it's so cute .Love my pitbull.🐾🐾
She doesn't even realize the Judge just called her out because she lied. "Degloving" 🫤
More of a misleading statement than a lie. The "initial assessment" was degloving, as she stated. But yeah, judges don't take to kindly to such games.