"People start to compete to write the best article" - yea, best as in highest rated. Not most factual, or information rich. It deafens the conversation because unconventional points of view will just be rated "wrong" by the ignorance of the majority.
Exactly... the "best article" will be the one most people like, which could be for subjective reasons... I think that would create a market where: a) people write articles made to appeal to majority of viewers, no matter the facts b) there WILL be paid auto-rating services to boost certain articles Also about the "Wikipedia is one article/one view per topic" claim... I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing, simply because they are purely objective and fact-based and editable by anyone. They don't present opinions, they present facts. If a fact/study/evidence is missing, you can just add it yourself, therefore there is no need to have more than one article on a given topic.
I strongly agree. The point of an encyclopedia is to agregate "all" the "objective", or at least factual, knowledge. Wikipedia uses the contributors to verify the articles and sources and the goal is to erase the points of view. For me, the idea saying that what is popular is true is a incorrect.
i feel like they're using blockchain simply to get more attention. you could easily make that project without blockchain, which would likely be cheaper, faster and easier to maintain.
This is probably the only channel I follow on UA-cam that I wait on in such anticipation for a new video to be released. He takes his time to create probably the best educative content on UA-cam. Kudos my man.
The same part also got me... If it's stored in a datacenter, then it's a database, not the blockchain. That's just your traditional, plain, old database. The whole point of the blockchain is to have a distributed storage of data over the whole globe, with not single person or enitiy in control of it.
The new UA-cam competitors sound like a good idea, but the new Wikipedia sounds like a very bad one. Having multiple articles that appeal to different demographics rather than one objective article is a terrible idea, it will only lead to more people becoming trapped in filter bubbles. If there are no objective sourcex for people to read, they will have no way of telling if their filter bubble is really telling them the truth. It also could be a threat to privacy if you have to share large amounts of personal info with the wiki every time you use it.
I feel as though it just gives us more facts or truth. Having a perspective from multiple sources could in theory just give a person a sense of knowledge
@Joseph Noonan Agreed. Truth is truth, facts are not negotiable and they do not care about your feelings or agenda. Feelings have become the new norm when it comes to deciding a wide variety of issues, from politics to sexuality to education and patriotism... to name but a few.
It's very bold of you to assume what is an objective source. It's nearly impossible to remain objective and the closest you can get to an objective truth is the average of multiple educated people's opinions. If you had a decentralised rating system that takes into account personal education and perspective, then the top rated article would be the closest thing to objective truth. I believe it has a lot of potential.
@@MrJcshorey The average of multiple educated people's opinions is already what Wikipedia gives, and it's the exact opposite of what you would get if you tried to split Wikipedia into multiple wikis for different demographics. You would end up with people reading the version of Wikipedia that is biased to appeal to them, as opposed to everyone reading the same information, which does have a lot of strict rules to make sure everything is factual and unbiased. Also, I don't think it's as impossible to remain objective as you think. That type of thinking is what got us into the post-truth mess we're currently in.
Whoever said 1:00 "this is the most important technology ever invented" needs to calm down and get some perspective on what's been invented in the last 100 years.
Well blockchain can be use for everything. Healthcare,finance,personal use, streaming,research. Think about this. Cancer research on blockchain can scale way faster then any supercomputer can. Etc etc.
Clearly block chain is most important technology. There is no comparison to something unimportant like modern cryptography of public/private keys - asymmetric encryption. There is no way to ensure a document or information is exactly what it should be, with proof that it wasn't tampered with, without the use of block chain. The future is having every computer on earth to have it's own copy of every block chain (looking at the video, probably tens of thousands in near future) (bit coin is just mere 149GB, so simple math of multiplying it should all fit on floppy disk). Just having the data is not enough, everyone needs to mine every single block, or how we can be sure it's safe? Those blocks will die without the community. BitCoin only uses 0.27% of all energy production on earth, if we use all energy, we can clearly do 1000x as many. PS. Above is mostly sarcasm and obvious errors mostly for humor, don't mind it too much.
Chris Fokjohn just look at the content which he is making 1.5 million is big, but the videos in this channel we're really well produced and made....I was just telling he deserves more subscribers for what ever he is making!!
Bitcoin is the internet of value and the only blockchain you will need. Bitcoin is the only blockchain that is decentral and censorship resistent! Blockchain without bitcoin is like intranet without the internet! Bitcoin is the thing, forget about all the i print my own money with a new central blockchain bullshit!!! We have one internet and wie will have one blockchain the bitcoin blockchain!!! All the crap sold by scamers how tray to sell the noobs there shit toke of no value! You can do all of that with bitcoin with sidecahins and lightning network. How wanst to buy 100 diffrend tokens that gose up and down in value just 4 one usecase? Bullshit they will make all on bitcoin The internet of value 1 token 4 all stuff. A globel decentral store of value money with the name bitcoin. Fuck that blockchain token bullshit!!!
"The best system will come out on top", Really? In the history of computing I have yet to see the best system win out. Happened before mainstream computing with Betamax and VHS and went on happening when computers came along. The best system is NOT always the one that most people end up using. As for competition to determine which articles rise to the top, have these people EVER seen the videos on UA-cam that have millions of views and likes? The system is polluted with nonsensical crap. The 10 best lists, $1 this Vs $1000 that, talking heads that regurgitate garbage that other talking heads spouted. If you are relying on users to determine what will rise to the top, you need your head examined. Still, the system we have now is so badly flawed, I do hope that Blockchain does something to fix the current divisive nature of the net.
Yes, there’s a big element of timing involved with becoming the market leader in an emerging technological industry. Since nothing like it has existed before, you only need to make enough forward progress for users to be impressed at the crucial time when the mainstream jumps in. In this situation it can be detrimental to over engineer the product, extending its development cycle or budget too far. But of course the opposite can also be true.
older companies just wont let you take their cash justlike dat they will resist and slow down progression so they can survive. so its a continuous war between moving foward and staying where we are maybe we should solve that first instead of ignoring it.
Well, maybe not the "best" in purely technical terms. A technically great system with crappy marketing against a workable competitor that has better network effect isn't likely to win despite being a better design. However if one system is 5x as efficient as it's competitor I think it will likely win out. Even if poorly implemented these are the kinds of things that can be copied and retried by others. VHS vs Betamax is pretty weak actually. There are some good comparison / review videos here on UA-cam and it's honestly not the big of a gap. Being marginally better isn't going to automatically make something win, but that doesn't mean the whole concept should be tossed out. If you don't want the nonsensical crap then choose your point of view as they put it. Your complaint is the exact thing they were talking about fixing. User voting works great. Look at reddit. Is there a lot of crap on reddit that you don't want? Yeah, but you can choose what kind of content you value and subscribe to the corresponding subs. They generally get crappier as they grow to large, but people just make alternative ones with more specific interest. That's what this is, but decentralized. Blockchain isn't likely to make people or the internet less divisive, but it can and probably will allow us to remove the middle men, and censors from our online interactions with others.
+Western Australia Now and Then agreed, I've seen promising technologies whither through lack of support and public appreciation. If most popular = best then Coca-Cola and McDonald's would qualify in their fields. The issue I see in a blockchain encyclopaedia is the atomisation and relativisation of knowledge. How can anyone communicate when they don't agree on terms and definitions?
So to be honest, I don't think the new Wikipedia is a good idea. Wikipedia has always been somewhat objective. If we get a bunch of of articles about every topic, each article would get less objective. Also, there would be less people to correct the article because there are more articles to correct or they could just write their own. This would lead to less discussion about articles and ultimately a lower quality and a higher chance of missinformation.
This is the reason why nobody cares about "the other wikies"; they do not have enough eyes on them (and even worse, not enough fingers) for their content to be relevant. -> The actual idea behind this "new Wikipedia" is to have the standard Wikipedia article "as default"; then if you do not like it you can read "alternative truths" from those groups just like you can currently check the same article in another languages [for certain topics it is about the same...].
Argamis (SilverComet) Yes. Everipedia is a way to profit from Wikipedia while adding a few things. They also don’t have website hosting costs so they can be a parasite on everyone else storage and bandwidth. Everipedia’s fundamental conception runs against the ethos of an encyclopaedia as an authoritative source of knowledge. It it’s place we have post-modern “competing narratives” which are voted for. It’s really an assemblage of a selection of things from the internet and they want us to create personal profiles so they can sell that information to advertisers. I suspect it will find an audience but their versions of the Wikipedia articles will gradually diverge and their site will get filled with low quality, but referenced, information. Will most Wikipedia editors switch over? Personally I doubt it.
You don't think adding a bunch of different subjective opinions on a subject would in turn average out to be the real truth from the people who know the subject best?
Bitcoin is the internet of value and the only blockchain you will need. Bitcoin is the only blockchain that is decentral and censorship resistent! Blockchain without bitcoin is like intranet without the internet! Bitcoin is the thing, forget about all the i print my own money with a new central blockchain bullshit!!! We have one internet and wie will have one blockchain the bitcoin blockchain!!! All the crap sold by scamers how tray to sell the noobs there shit toke of no value! You can do all of that with bitcoin with sidecahins and lightning network. How wanst to buy 100 diffrend tokens that gose up and down in value just 4 one usecase? Bullshit they will make all on bitcoin The internet of value 1 token 4 all stuff. A globel decentral store of value money with the name bitcoin. Fuck that blockchain token bullshit!!!
The blockchain implementation the guy in the interview and some of the UA-cam competitors propose is ignorant beyond reality. You just need to see UA-cam's most watched, most liked and trending videos, and Letterboxd's and Reddit's most liked comments (in non-niche communities) to realize that the tyranny of the majority will NOT determine the best information, but the most memeable. PS: 3:30 "DEMONITISION"
There are evil banks in my country, like if we save money in the bank like I have a 5,000 if you don't deposit for 6 months they will consider your account as dormant and start deducting 300 every month, what's the use of saving if they keep on taking some cash in the deposit. That's why we switch to other bank.
Your rating cannot be manipulated. In usual cade there is a private site where you give your rating, it could be manipulated as much as they like. That doesn't mean that this purpose of blockchain is of much importance.
6 років тому+25
Your ratings can't be manipulated, but article rating totals most likely can be manipulated by fake accounts, unless they somehow solve that problem - but I really doubt it.
@Btt I can think of a reason good, honest, intelligent people like us NEED to have block chain records of opinions about online articles. Imagine if you could have simple phone access to an unchangeable record of everyone who had ever supported an article that undermined your position. This information technology is exactly what we good,honest, intelligent people need to weed out all the evil, lying, stupid unpersons that disagree with our truth. 7:49 Yeah... This Everipedia idea could *never* be misused, not even by governments... and obviously it won't *ever* polarise anyone.
Exactly. The video has extremely poor focus due to not explaining blockchain and instead giving a bunch of examples of companies that in my opinion look like BS. Gives blockchain a back name.
Controversial topics are interesting topics. If we all agree on anyting and everything, what's the point? Besides, 'controversial' is a bit vauge. ANYTHING can be controversial form a referee's decision in a sports event to an election to which resolution is best for YT videos to if a song is any good ... and the list goes on and on. Picking the brain with stimulating topics and arguments is good, and THAT is why YT put that in theri ToS. A dumb audience makes you more $$$.
+Stefano Papaleo Right. Controversial means controversial to THEM. Count dankula is a great example. He was convicted of the crime of being grossly offensive, but the judges ruling is grossly offensive to me, so why isn't the judge also convicting himself? It proves that it's not being grossly offensive that is the problem, it is being offensive to the sensitivities of a specific ideology that has power right now. They just couch it in terms of people "being offensive" in some general sense. But that is a lie. Like you said, everything is offensive to someone.
This video doesn't give Ethereum the credit it deserves. Ethereum started the smart contract revolution and many of the mentioned projects are literally on Ethereum. Yet this video mentions it a single time to criticize it then lauds platforms that don't even exist yet and are literally following down the path that Ethereum blazed. It's seriously myopic. People in the Ethereum space have literally been talking about the exact subject matter in this video for years now and now this video emerges and acts like this is all new and Ethereum isn't even important. Sad.
I Like ColdFusion's channel so much. the way Dagogo's speak, the information's telling order, and the music. I even automatically play ColdFusion videos automatically when I'm on my bedroom. its just so good. Thank you Dagogo.
It’s not nearly as sinple as it is laid out in in this video. One example is smart contracts, and the statement that there will be “no 3rd parties”; Hardly any agreement of significance can be solved with smart contracts as it is today. In addition, regulation is entirely ignored in these thoughts, and that is not likely to be actually beneficial to society. A last side comment is about youtube competitors with no ads, no ‘censorship’, and with users getting paid - How is that a viable idea? Think of a single site, or place today where there are no rules or regulations - it does not work like that - you don’t use them. And as soon as you find out that you need moderation, you also find out that you need money to do that, so you’ll stop paying users, or start displaying ads, If not both, and what you have now is a less popular, less viable youtube clone.
Another one with a working brain! Yeah... let's just ignore laws because... no one will notice, right? Or human nature. You can put in code whatever you want. Unless, it is really something truely automatic and not human-depenant, any other type of service - from pizza delivery to a company merger - is out of the question. Or all of a sudden we've become so good we do not litigate, find excuses, make mistakes, are alwyas honest and agree on everything? The contract can be as smart as you like but if the parties involved are not... good luck with that.
[TL,DR]Humble yourself and be understanding. There are people more stupid than me... or you - Who wil take your words and belive them at face value. It's hard to believe that this topic could be met with such hostility - but, I do suppose the earth is flat now, isn't it? Perhaps this could have been resolved with a question, as obnoxious as that resolution tactic is. The question/s I'd like to propose are not ones that I have any higher understanding of, I cannot answer myself. I do know of what I do not know - and I think this should be used to understand our world and be the basis for how we form/present our views. Enough of my big (dumb) head; I ask you, what do you know of the methods used to encrypt, share, and validate the "blocks" in the chain? Do you have an understanding of what is required to corrupt the chain or to inject the chain with false data? Do you have any idea how automated/controlled generation of programming code(machine readable language) is done? - If not, perhaps you have used Adobe Flash, "" Dreamweaver, Visual Studio, or maybe Unity? Can you imagine this software using using something like a cloud network to validate it's self? Have you ever played a pirated game that seamlessly interacted with the Steam online services as though it were an unaltered version of that game? How long do you think it would last before, at the very least, your Steam services shut down. The BlockChain "as a service" would be one with many rules. Like Steam, the service might use it's rules as algorithms to ensure the service works. In another likeness it is easy to assume that any one persons personal computer network is filled with security holes and is easy to break into. I find it novel to think that the entirety of written legal law could be pushed into a legal BlockChain Contract service. That it might use its software to reference the relevant law and return a result of "level of adherence". The service could then push the new contract into the chain(Or have already done so for validation) and ask for a finalisation, a "Tick" of approval from both parties. I believe the place you are talking about, where everything could be posted and nothing was ever peer reviewed for legitimacy was 4-Chan, or perhaps a 4-Chan like clone hanging off of the Tor network. This is not that network. @Stefano Papaleo. Stop making these judgements. You ARE an important person. You are important for what you can do, and will do, and have done to help those around you. You are important for all the changes you will make that improve your world, and the ones you share it with. You may express these opinions with these strong feelings, and it may feel as though you have thrust forward with your sword, but these views leave you impotent in my eyes. Use those feeling to fire you on, be open minded and passionate at the same time, and go deeper/discover more about these subjects that grip you to feel this way.
Yeah of course and why not a banana-blockchain? I'm not sure that blockchain can be put in every fucking thing, maybe I'm not seeing the bigger picture and I'm wrong, but, to me blockchain makes sense only for a few applications. An example can be: make easier trade, giving guarantees to both parties. A blockchain Wikipedia is such a bad idea to me, and all the features of it can be achieved creating a site where you sign in giving your data like where are you from...
It is funny how institutions are desperately trying to dissociate blockchains and cryptocurrencies. A blockchain is more secure with more nodes on the network. People need incentives to run nodes to validate transactions and keep the network decentralized by making a 51 percent attack computationally expensive. There is a game theory at play here. The "private" blockchains that banks and other institutions are building are not blockchain but a slightly altered version of a distributed database with worst transaction time.
Pretty much accurate except it's the mining that needs to be incentiveized to protect form attack, not node operation. But yeah, blockchain by itself is useless. Two full years after we started hearing 'blockchain is the real innovation' there still isn't a single project that uses 'blockchain' without a token (or coin) incentivizing the system. In fact, now in late 2019, its very very rare to hearing anyone repeating this 'muh blockchain without crypto-currency' idea.
Very well compiled 4-part video series detailing what blockchain is and how it works. Imagination espouses a near limitless possibility surrounding blockchain's future. *_TRUST !!_*
Most of the current blockchain projects are using blockchain just because ICOs (were) are easy way to get funding. Answer these questions to see if project really benefits by using blockchain: - does data need to be immutable? - do we need trust-less distributed database? Also, I highly question all the projects where user data is stored on block chain because of GDPR.
My name is Crallo and I study software engineering. I was wondering why my project combat professor is so into blockchains. He basically shoved blockchains down our throats but now I understand why. Thank you for the dope and informative video.
Dagogo, you should lunch a new series on this channel teaching people on how to Search/Synthesize/Present information effectively : People need it every day, you master it, hence the perfect match. Invest in that skill, diversify the content.
That's amazing, the block chain is touching almost every aspect of life. Which means it's benefits are going to reach everyone irrespective of socioeconomic status. Technology should reach everyone and block chain technology is one of those. Thanks for broadening my thoughts.
Arun S Kumar Bitcoin just needs a good hook and it'll go mainstream overnight.. the price of coins will increase and say goodbye to regular banks over the next decade.
Bitcoin is the internet of value and the only blockchain you will need. Bitcoin is the only blockchain that is decentral and censorship resistent! Blockchain without bitcoin is like intranet without the internet! Bitcoin is the thing, forget about all the i print my own money with a new central blockchain bullshit!!! We have one internet and wie will have one blockchain the bitcoin blockchain!!! All the crap sold by scamers how tray to sell the noobs there shit toke of no value! You can do all of that with bitcoin with sidecahins and lightning network. How wanst to buy 100 diffrend tokens that gose up and down in value just 4 one usecase? Bullshit they will make all on bitcoin The internet of value 1 token 4 all stuff. A globel decentral store of value money with the name bitcoin. Fuck that blockchain token bullshit!!!
It won't. No way will the people in power give up so easily. They will just buy up most of the ASIC's and GPU and create massive farms. That way they will be in control of the majority of the chain. If they own the majority then they effectively own it all.
this video is highly biased towards blockchain though, it makes it sound like a god sent solution, yet there is no truly untamperable technology. Just look at the hacked history of bitcoin. Blockchain is affected just as similarly.
@@EltonL No, they are developping the Bittubers platform and great Mobile apps right now...when the mobile apps will be available this thing will fly again and Moon!
Hold up. Paid to watch? Viewers are paid to watch? What’s the catch? Is it a subscription service or something? That sounds too good to be true. I don’t really understand how that works.
Think of it like this: whenever you watch a video, there’s an ad. The company of that ad pays youtube. Imagine you watch the ad on a non-private company like youtube, the company either pays the content creator or you, the viewer.
Blockchain wasn't invented for Bitcoin. It was invented in 1995. Then went mostly unused until 2008 when shatoshi nakamoto used it to make Bitcoin. It was then when people realised that its uses. Blockchain was already invented but Bitcoin made it famous
And as per usual, brilliant. It looks like block chain is the future of any kind of financial transactions between people, so no more faceless organisations profiting of your hard work and efforts.
I understand that this technology is fantastic, but I think you are overreacting and amplifying the benefits too much, while not adressing the cons of the Blockchain.
@Pegasi -- Speed is a major issue with blockchain and if you plan on being fast, you slowly become either expensive to operate or having to use expensive nodes and becoming slightly centralized. The point of blockchain was to remain fully decentralized and it can't manage do that and at the same time managed high speed.
@Pegasi -- There are competing techs that wants to fix blockchain but themselves they are not blockchains, they use a different approach. So far the most promising one is the gossip about gossip protocol
Forget Tangle, better tech coming around the corner. Anything that is blockchain based is slow or not as secure as it should be. Don't get me wrong, promising technology but we were due for an upgrade.
It looks like everyone sees only postive outcomes from this. Big multinational companies, in particular those related to finance, mainly will benefit of block chain, alllow them less and less tranasparency in transactions, and authororities less and less power of supervision and control of criminal activities. Ask yourself why Dubai is the first to embrace this...? Another negative aspect is the loss of a huge amount of jobs, cutting the middle man, means that, so, yes it's true if you are a businessman you can have finally your opportunity, but for the majority of earth population, having an employment, due also the direction of automatization, will be extremely difficult, most of people will end up working for big multinationals. If we don't think to a different source of income, who will buy product and services?
um its complete transparency. the ledger is public dude. do more research government will be run on blockchain. our votes will count. each person will matter.
@@myles5158 nah i used use block chain to buy drugs online and some stolen credit cards (no bank could report this to police cuz its decentralized ). I know about bitcoin since 2013 -2014 when dark net was in early stages, and to buy illegal stuff you first needed to buy bitcoin(then it was a lot cheaper) this is how i learned about block chain and bitcoin(back then it was harder to find info about this topic).About the "complete transparency" you dont see the name of the person so for example i sell drugs and i made a lot of money lets say 50 million$, then i what to transfer this money to another acc (a bank will imediatley see and block the transaction) but with bitcoin nah bc no one knows who am i .So maybe i am bill gates and 50 million is just pocket money. So the transaction will go. But to be more safe we (dark net community) have bitcoin mixer, or etherium mixer (dosent matter) its a money (bitcoin) laundering machine that dose like the name says. Bitcoin mixer its a new super way of money laundering and this is done with block chain "complete transparency". In conclusion my point is block chain is Criminal haven.
Can't do decentralized without also using something like the blockchain. Any decentralization without some form of security will be too easily hackable, hence why big companies like Google have centralized servers. To be fair, Google hasn't move into the decentralized area yet.
Supremax67 • social networks like mastodon or diaspora* are decentralised and don't need blockchain, do they? I am thinking of sth like GNU MediaGoblin or PeerTube, though I am not familar with them.
AwakeningTVII, yh true but if you have a decentralised autonomous network for AI like SingularityNET, then maybe... Skynet = blockchain + AI... maybe worth investing in for now though xD
@@alexradu1921 the internet is a network of networks. There is no way to shut all of them down. For example, bitcoin also works over shortwave radio and satellites. So at least for truly decentralized blockchains (bitcoin might be the only example of this), it will continue to run.
@@plasticman2011 Though Bitcoin is becoming more and more centralized as mining pools continue to expand (some of which already control 25% of the computing power used by bitcoin).
@@JonSnow-sd1hl actually, that is a common misconception. Mining pools don't have direct control of the vast majority of the mining equipment in the pool. This means bitcoin is mich more decentralized than it would appear if you just look at pools. The owners of the mining equipment can switch to a different pool very quickly if a pool operator acts in an unexpected way.
Nice to see that coldfusion is a fan of synthwave. I already had my suspicions in earler videos where you used some clips that are associated with synthwave track compilations, but when i heard lazerhawk-so far away, i knew for sure 😅 keep up the good work exposing the masses to this great genre of music 👍
@@Carthodon Could this be your opinion based on your level of knowledge.? Please, this is a serious question and not at all intended to be facetious. I know virtually nothing of blockchain, perhaps the reason why my query may seem as an odd one. I truly do not know. So, for someone such as myself, one in possession of so very little knowledge in this matter, does this video hold any different value.? Meaning, is it a good starting place or is the information simply bad.?
Centralized: Requires trusted party to hold data. Decentralized: Trusted party isn't required. Enormous electricity is consumed, all data is duplicated on each node requiring a factor of storage space for each miner. If the database is 100GB and there are 10,000 miners, we now need 100GB*10,000 in storage. If a ledger activity requires 60W, we now need 10,000*60W of electricity to perform the activity. A centralized system only requires 100GB and 60W. Can someone explain to me how this is necessarily better? Decentralized is FAR less efficient than centralized despite maybe being more trustworthy. It's also vulnerable to quantum computing hackers, 51% attacks by mining farms, and individual nodes have no power against large mining pools. Government computer systems and electric consumption far outweighs any node in his Mom's basement. So the system becomes centralized anyway. Out of all the blockchain prophets out there, none of them have convinced me on why this is one of the most important inventions in human history. Try to explain it to me from a technological standpoint.
I have saved so much money in fees by simly using cryptocurrencys. My bank charges me about 0.60US$ plus 1.2% of the value of the transaction in fees. By using bitcoin (assuming the mempool is empty) I pay at most 0.03US$
These days the generation of my father (born around 1960) is talking about how they got their first Commodore and how they learnt to program simple games like Snake. I see the future where I'll tell my children about how I discovered the idea of Blockchain and how it fascinated me, so I learned about it during it's process of becoming a fundamental part of technology and our daily life.
Look up "three blue one brown blockchain" on UA-cam, and check out this article... medium.com/@matteozago/why-the-web-3-0-matters-and-you-should-know-about-it-a5851d63c949 Those are decent places to start, imo.
Haiku Metzger once i thought of it like an accounting system that instantly updates and is sent to thousands of people periodically it made more sense to me. That's the decentralized aspect anyway. Also the ledger can't be hacked because you would basically have to hack computer simultaneously who has a copy of the ledger, typically thousands or millions of computers
Not really. You must understand first how is that Blockchain actually works. Remember it is a DECENTRALIZED system; it has a "logo" and sort of a "brand name" or something, but they are projects that are OPEN SOURCE (just like the internet itself), so everyone can participate and collaborate in whatever the projects needs to be successful (including marketing). Developers and investors, basically HODL (take a look at that ;) the cryptocurrency (coin) related to the project, in which is basically reflected the valued of the project itself (just like the price of a company's stock). Thus they believe the project will become succesful as many people will create demand for the coin as it is useful (e.g Bitcoin is better than using a bank for international transactions) and therfore making the price going up. "The higher the demand, higher the price" Basic economic principle. Well I hope this helps everyone understand a liltle bit more about the topic.
Daniel Giraldo Thanks for that details explantation. FYI: I am a Software Engineer and have deployed few Dapps in EVM. Firstly, in order to for you to build a system it involves many components including but not limited to Client (iOS Android), API Server (Component that your client can talk to) Your Database and the Dapp (Smart contract). A Smart contract is only a component of the system which is decentralised everything else is not. An organization does not open source all its components. even if it does the organization has full control of the pull request it can accept. Smart contracts are not like-real world contracts. Smart contracts can always be updated without you ever knowing it. (Just google it) in conclusion. Blockchain is a solution that is looking for a problem.
@Nitin Muthyala -- If you are a Software Engineer, then you should be taking a closer look at Hashgraph. The way blockchain is designed, many flaws will never be fixed, so they came up with a solution to this 10 years problem.
"A Smart contract is only a component of the system which is decentralised everything else is not" Where did you get that? Decentralized databases is actually pretty much the core of the concept. You are software engineer but it seems Blockchain is not your field.
What he described about "Everipedia" is what "Quora" app does today but without blockchain technology.😊 Everipedia is the evolution of Quora to become more secure and user friendly.
As always, great work Dagogo. I've been following you for a while but this is the first time I comment since you always allow me to understand what's going on on the edge. Thanks!
I love how the boomer posting in all caps is actually a real thing and not just a meme Don't take it personal Frank! Boomers might be funny on the internet but they're good enough people. Cheers
I'm not going to lie, this made me fcking cry. It's wonderful to see that the world as a whole is taking steps to be fair. Whether its for themselves or for others, its still a whole big load of awesome. Thank you.
The disadvantage is that governments will outlaw decentralized coins / services and enforce their own monopoly that steals all the benefits from the common people.
Scalability is the biggest driver of this technology's development. The challenge of decentralizing the state of a piece of data by distributing it among a network of computers, while also keeping the whole thing sufficiently responsive such that transactions require low work and occur quickly, while at the same time keeping the whole network's data safe is the big challenge. The reason it's a challenge, is because it's a hard problem to solve that's comparatively easy to solve in centralized networks.
@Jan Daniel Alcantra -- It is slow, very slow. None of the networks are Asyncronous Byzantine Fault Tolerant (which is the highest form of security) while remaining fast. But don't worry, that technology is just around the corner, and it addresses all the issues of blockchain. As for the 51 percent attack is not a thing, between attacking 1/3 of the network and setting up a firewall, you can disrupt the entire blockchain network. Anyone who talks about the 51% attack has no clue how it works.
Medical Records??? What kind of value are medical records. All this sounds to much like George Orwell's 1984. All this cryptocurrency crap will one day collapse I just hope you're not heavily invested because you will lose every penny. Give me something intrinsic such as gold or silver a useful material.
dude, u cant see a good oppurtunity when its staring u in the face huh? do u see whats happening right now. big institutions are jumping on board for crypto. thats tjhe money aspect. but blockchain is the future move with it or get left behind. do you know how many millionaires bitcoin made? do you know how many millionaires will be made from blockchain? dude open your eyes.
With each one of these videos I feel like I'm closer and closer to understanding what (a?) blockchain is, but I still feel like I don't fully comprehend it
Blockchain technology is only revolutionary when it's truly decentralized and open source. If that's not the case, then any application of blockchain technology can only be described as a really poor choice of database. The true revolution here, is that open source blockchain projects hold the promise of delivering truly decentralized protocols and platforms, which cannot be censored or controlled. This is huge!
I would like to know more technical details on how it's gonna work. For example, the blockchain wikipedia. Will all the articles be distributed among all the users and there will be no centralized server? So that's why it's so special? If this is how it's gonna work then, I see a problem of storing this data on individuals' computers the same as storing a history of all the bitcoin operations. But maybe I don't understand it correctly.
As a user you'll just access the data as you do Wikipedia or any website. The only computers the whole blockchain is distributed to are the people running the nodes, which could be you if you're up to the task.
I'm a programmer and some time ago I've tried creating a website using blockchain and experience wasn't so great. So blockchain Wikipedia will work similarly and I'm curious how many data will be stored on individual nodes and if people are willing to store such data. I assume that there won't be so many people. You can look at it in a similar way how torrents work. If a file is very old then there is little chance of having any seeds. Maybe I'm wrong but I think that for 99% services there will always be a need for the central server.
oh lord, who believes in his BS hype. The concepts of ledger systems, temporal databases and distributed systems are old. The current techniques for blockchain used in bitcoin and ethereum don't scale. There's serious technical challenges that haven't been solved. There are newer frameworks trying to fix those architectural limitations, but they aren't proven. The biggest flaw of current approach to blockchain is they're too computationally heavy. The newer approaches claim they solve some of these issues, but they haven't proven themselves. The claimed of privacy and anonymity are stupid for several reasons. A full proof anonymous system will make money laundering trivial and therefore benefit organized criminals more than the average person. Organized crime can be the Russian Mafia or JPM Chase. So yeah, we need to make it easier for them to screw the rest of us. I worked in financial industry for several years on regulations. Many of those laws exist to protect the public from bad people and organizations. A truly anonymous system doesn't actually protect your privacy as long as some activity you do is publicly visible. To have 100% privacy, you'd have to move to the north pole, not buy anything with money or interact with people in public space. What people need isn't true privacy. What they want is for businesses to act ethically and abuse the data they collect. Blockchain might become more useful if the technical challenges are resolved. Until then, most of the hype is from people looking to make a quick buck from suckers.
I love ignorant people, let's see who got this wrong.... @Nanocryk -- You say it has many limitations but don't name any, don't spread FUD.... @A c -- Oh how ignorant you are, with their announcement of their Hedera Public network 1.0, the technology will be wide open and license free. Stop spreading FUD. @Christo -- Oh how ignorant you are, they been running a private version for the last 3 years successfully and in the middle of completing their public network which they have successfully tested. More than a dozen companies as partnered up with them for both versions. I own several crypto currency and I own nothing in terms of Hashgraph assets, so when you hear a guy like me give a positive feedback on their product, it's as unbiased as it can possibly get. Unlike you guys which probably owns crypto coins and would have much to lose if your currency would go down. Only reviews that can be fully trusted are the unbiased one. You speak ill on a project you are fully invested or you speak good about a project you don't own any shares or assets, anything else and it could be considered being BIAS.
how can you say blockchain is bigger than bitcoin? You need some education - blockchain is only possible when the security of the blockchain is sound i.e Bitcoin. Your channel has lost my respect
ShadowMaster 45 we supposedly live in a world where we backup claims with evidence, thus forming a logical opinion. Now we make claims based upon unreasonable scenarios and argue against logical outcomes with the premise “but it can happen, you cant deny there is a chance”. People of reason go by that which is more likely, and it is UNLIKELY to presuppose that any crypto or blockchain to date has come close to the secure properties of bitcoin. A blockchain is defined predominantly by its secure decentralised nature, which cannot be attributed to any private network, unless by private you mean to suggest networks like the lightning network which many assume to be a private side chain- when in-fact is a remarkable decentralised innovation built on-top of the bitcoins SECURE protocol.
Unfortunately he didn't do blockchain the full package. Many issues with the tech that won't be solved until something better is coming, and that solution should be some time this year.
1:12 The easiest definition I can think of to describe blockchain is Identify and Exchange. Decentralization to me is just a matter of good, better, or best ways to identify and exchange within any given system.
I learned a lot here thanks. I really like you channel. Coldfusion.
6 років тому+1
Great research and presentation as always Dagogo, I really appreciate having content like yours available to keep myself updated on such interesting topics, keep up the good work!
Cold Fusion has one of the most dope intros
It's by Beeple
Doppidy dope
@@jixal Beeple doesn't have this much class.
"People start to compete to write the best article" - yea, best as in highest rated. Not most factual, or information rich.
It deafens the conversation because unconventional points of view will just be rated "wrong" by the ignorance of the majority.
unused
The first relevant comment after scrolling through 20+ top comments. Which basically proves your (and my) point.
Exactly... the "best article" will be the one most people like, which could be for subjective reasons...
I think that would create a market where:
a) people write articles made to appeal to majority of viewers, no matter the facts
b) there WILL be paid auto-rating services to boost certain articles
Also about the "Wikipedia is one article/one view per topic" claim... I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing, simply because they are purely objective and fact-based and editable by anyone. They don't present opinions, they present facts. If a fact/study/evidence is missing, you can just add it yourself, therefore there is no need to have more than one article on a given topic.
I strongly agree. The point of an encyclopedia is to agregate "all" the "objective", or at least factual, knowledge. Wikipedia uses the contributors to verify the articles and sources and the goal is to erase the points of view. For me, the idea saying that what is popular is true is a incorrect.
unused Absplutely correct, that makes no sense, Truth is the way it is you either you like it or not
i feel like they're using blockchain simply to get more attention. you could easily make that project without blockchain, which would likely be cheaper, faster and easier to maintain.
This is probably the only channel I follow on UA-cam that I wait on in such anticipation for a new video to be released. He takes his time to create probably the best educative content on UA-cam. Kudos my man.
"to create a new datacenter to store all public records on blockchain" yo wtf
The same part also got me... If it's stored in a datacenter, then it's a database, not the blockchain. That's just your traditional, plain, old database. The whole point of the blockchain is to have a distributed storage of data over the whole globe, with not single person or enitiy in control of it.
The new UA-cam competitors sound like a good idea, but the new Wikipedia sounds like a very bad one. Having multiple articles that appeal to different demographics rather than one objective article is a terrible idea, it will only lead to more people becoming trapped in filter bubbles. If there are no objective sourcex for people to read, they will have no way of telling if their filter bubble is really telling them the truth. It also could be a threat to privacy if you have to share large amounts of personal info with the wiki every time you use it.
I feel as though it just gives us more facts or truth.
Having a perspective from multiple sources could in theory just give a person a sense of knowledge
@Joseph Noonan
Agreed. Truth is truth, facts are not negotiable and they do not care about your feelings or agenda. Feelings have become the new norm when it comes to deciding a wide variety of issues, from politics to sexuality to education and patriotism... to name but a few.
It's very bold of you to assume what is an objective source. It's nearly impossible to remain objective and the closest you can get to an objective truth is the average of multiple educated people's opinions. If you had a decentralised rating system that takes into account personal education and perspective, then the top rated article would be the closest thing to objective truth. I believe it has a lot of potential.
@@MrJcshorey The average of multiple educated people's opinions is already what Wikipedia gives, and it's the exact opposite of what you would get if you tried to split Wikipedia into multiple wikis for different demographics. You would end up with people reading the version of Wikipedia that is biased to appeal to them, as opposed to everyone reading the same information, which does have a lot of strict rules to make sure everything is factual and unbiased. Also, I don't think it's as impossible to remain objective as you think. That type of thinking is what got us into the post-truth mess we're currently in.
Whoever said 1:00 "this is the most important technology ever invented" needs to calm down and get some perspective on what's been invented in the last 100 years.
Well blockchain can be use for everything. Healthcare,finance,personal use, streaming,research. Think about this. Cancer research on blockchain can scale way faster then any supercomputer can. Etc etc.
tech enthusiast live for opportunities to make hyperbolic perspective-free claims.
This would be the most important technology invention in online security.
yes it's not blockchain but meme
Clearly block chain is most important technology. There is no comparison to something unimportant like modern cryptography of public/private keys - asymmetric encryption.
There is no way to ensure a document or information is exactly what it should be, with proof that it wasn't tampered with, without the use of block chain.
The future is having every computer on earth to have it's own copy of every block chain (looking at the video, probably tens of thousands in near future) (bit coin is just mere 149GB, so simple math of multiplying it should all fit on floppy disk).
Just having the data is not enough, everyone needs to mine every single block, or how we can be sure it's safe? Those blocks will die without the community. BitCoin only uses 0.27% of all energy production on earth, if we use all energy, we can clearly do 1000x as many.
PS. Above is mostly sarcasm and obvious errors mostly for humor, don't mind it too much.
Damn this channel is very underrated
1,5 mil subs and it's underrated? Bullshit
Chris Fokjohn just look at the content which he is making 1.5 million is big, but the videos in this channel we're really well produced and made....I was just telling he deserves more subscribers for what ever he is making!!
😂😂😂 WTF even is an underrated channel. People are so f**king stupid.
Bitcoin is the internet of value and the only blockchain you will need. Bitcoin is the only blockchain that is decentral and censorship resistent! Blockchain without bitcoin is like intranet without the internet! Bitcoin is the thing, forget about all the i print my own money with a new central blockchain bullshit!!! We have one internet and wie will have one blockchain the bitcoin blockchain!!! All the crap sold by scamers how tray to sell the noobs there shit toke of no value! You can do all of that with bitcoin with sidecahins and lightning network. How wanst to buy 100 diffrend tokens that gose up and down in value just 4 one usecase? Bullshit they will make all on bitcoin The internet of value 1 token 4 all stuff. A globel decentral store of value money with the name bitcoin. Fuck that blockchain token bullshit!!!
1.5m and still underrated huh! lol
"The best system will come out on top", Really? In the history of computing I have yet to see the best system win out. Happened before mainstream computing with Betamax and VHS and went on happening when computers came along. The best system is NOT always the one that most people end up using. As for competition to determine which articles rise to the top, have these people EVER seen the videos on UA-cam that have millions of views and likes? The system is polluted with nonsensical crap. The 10 best lists, $1 this Vs $1000 that, talking heads that regurgitate garbage that other talking heads spouted. If you are relying on users to determine what will rise to the top, you need your head examined. Still, the system we have now is so badly flawed, I do hope that Blockchain does something to fix the current divisive nature of the net.
Yes, there’s a big element of timing involved with becoming the market leader in an emerging technological industry. Since nothing like it has existed before, you only need to make enough forward progress for users to be impressed at the crucial time when the mainstream jumps in. In this situation it can be detrimental to over engineer the product, extending its development cycle or budget too far. But of course the opposite can also be true.
Exactly. Just look at HDMI vs displayport.
older companies just wont let you take their cash justlike dat they will resist and slow down progression so they can survive. so its a continuous war between moving foward and staying where we are maybe we should solve that first instead of ignoring it.
Well, maybe not the "best" in purely technical terms. A technically great system with crappy marketing against a workable competitor that has better network effect isn't likely to win despite being a better design.
However if one system is 5x as efficient as it's competitor I think it will likely win out. Even if poorly implemented these are the kinds of things that can be copied and retried by others.
VHS vs Betamax is pretty weak actually. There are some good comparison / review videos here on UA-cam and it's honestly not the big of a gap. Being marginally better isn't going to automatically make something win, but that doesn't mean the whole concept should be tossed out.
If you don't want the nonsensical crap then choose your point of view as they put it. Your complaint is the exact thing they were talking about fixing.
User voting works great. Look at reddit. Is there a lot of crap on reddit that you don't want? Yeah, but you can choose what kind of content you value and subscribe to the corresponding subs. They generally get crappier as they grow to large, but people just make alternative ones with more specific interest. That's what this is, but decentralized.
Blockchain isn't likely to make people or the internet less divisive, but it can and probably will allow us to remove the middle men, and censors from our online interactions with others.
+Western Australia Now and Then agreed, I've seen promising technologies whither through lack of support and public appreciation. If most popular = best then Coca-Cola and McDonald's would qualify in their fields. The issue I see in a blockchain encyclopaedia is the atomisation and relativisation of knowledge. How can anyone communicate when they don't agree on terms and definitions?
So to be honest, I don't think the new Wikipedia is a good idea. Wikipedia has always been somewhat objective. If we get a bunch of of articles about every topic, each article would get less objective. Also, there would be less people to correct the article because there are more articles to correct or they could just write their own. This would lead to less discussion about articles and ultimately a lower quality and a higher chance of missinformation.
This is the reason why nobody cares about "the other wikies"; they do not have enough eyes on them (and even worse, not enough fingers) for their content to be relevant.
-> The actual idea behind this "new Wikipedia" is to have the standard Wikipedia article "as default"; then if you do not like it you can read "alternative truths" from those groups just like you can currently check the same article in another languages [for certain topics it is about the same...].
Argamis (SilverComet) Yes. Everipedia is a way to profit from Wikipedia while adding a few things. They also don’t have website hosting costs so they can be a parasite on everyone else storage and bandwidth.
Everipedia’s fundamental conception runs against the ethos of an encyclopaedia as an authoritative source of knowledge. It it’s place we have post-modern “competing narratives” which are voted for. It’s really an assemblage of a selection of things from the internet and they want us to create personal profiles so they can sell that information to advertisers. I suspect it will find an audience but their versions of the Wikipedia articles will gradually diverge and their site will get filled with low quality, but referenced, information.
Will most Wikipedia editors switch over? Personally I doubt it.
Worth adding that it’s not the first parasite on Wikipedia.
They don’t even need to use blockchain for that Wikipedia idea.
You don't think adding a bunch of different subjective opinions on a subject would in turn average out to be the real truth from the people who know the subject best?
dude, your videos are so good, I'm always looking forward to the next one
Bitcoooneeect
you won, kudos!
Utkarsh Koppikar Wasa wasa wasa wasaaaaa!
hey hey heeeyyy
Utkarsh Koppikar Wasso wasso wasso Wasssup
Wassa wassa wassa wassa wassaap bitconeccccttt!!!!
Are you kidding me!? Kurzgesagt is being demonitized, what the hell did they do wrong. They make such high quality educational content.
I wonder if it was the war on drugs video.
Dukkiegamer I agree. Just speculating.
Dukkiegamer I'd imagine it's due to special interest groups.
They must have gone against one of the many fallacious, propagated narratives.
YT thinks that dеаths of drawn birds are enough to dеmопеtizе a channel
*ThIs iS GoOd fOr bItCoIn*
This is extremely dangerous to our democracy
Edit: calm down I was making a reference to this: ua-cam.com/video/hWLjYJ4BzvI/v-deo.html
Guys it was a reference to this: ua-cam.com/video/hWLjYJ4BzvI/v-deo.html
Justin Y. Bitcoin its self will probably fail
No bitcoin invented it.
Bitcoin is the internet of value and the only blockchain you will need. Bitcoin is the only blockchain that is decentral and censorship resistent! Blockchain without bitcoin is like intranet without the internet! Bitcoin is the thing, forget about all the i print my own money with a new central blockchain bullshit!!! We have one internet and wie will have one blockchain the bitcoin blockchain!!! All the crap sold by scamers how tray to sell the noobs there shit toke of no value! You can do all of that with bitcoin with sidecahins and lightning network. How wanst to buy 100 diffrend tokens that gose up and down in value just 4 one usecase? Bullshit they will make all on bitcoin The internet of value 1 token 4 all stuff. A globel decentral store of value money with the name bitcoin. Fuck that blockchain token bullshit!!!
The blockchain implementation the guy in the interview and some of the UA-cam competitors propose is ignorant beyond reality. You just need to see UA-cam's most watched, most liked and trending videos, and Letterboxd's and Reddit's most liked comments (in non-niche communities) to realize that the tyranny of the majority will NOT determine the best information, but the most memeable.
PS: 3:30 "DEMONITISION"
Cutting the middle man..
For me the middle man is Banks
If this can kill Banks, I will be satisfied.
haha...agree
Don't buy Ripple (XRP) they are trying to get in bed with banks and outlaw every other coin.
That's the whole idea.
Invisible Prison I hope they fail.
Banks are evil, they sweet talk you into screwing yourself.
I don't understand how that is legal.
There are evil banks in my country, like if we save money in the bank like I have a 5,000 if you don't deposit for 6 months they will consider your account as dormant and start deducting 300 every month, what's the use of saving if they keep on taking some cash in the deposit. That's why we switch to other bank.
I'm confused....why would we need blockchain in order to rate & compare articles??
Becasue it is a fad and everyone is jumping on that wagon. You need a blockchain for your laundry too, didn't you know? ;)
Your rating cannot be manipulated. In usual cade there is a private site where you give your rating, it could be manipulated as much as they like. That doesn't mean that this purpose of blockchain is of much importance.
Your ratings can't be manipulated, but article rating totals most likely can be manipulated by fake accounts, unless they somehow solve that problem - but I really doubt it.
@Btt
I can think of a reason good, honest, intelligent people like us NEED to have block chain records of opinions about online articles.
Imagine if you could have simple phone access to an unchangeable record of everyone who had ever supported an article that undermined your position. This information technology is exactly what we good,honest, intelligent people need to weed out all the evil, lying, stupid unpersons that disagree with our truth.
7:49 Yeah... This Everipedia idea could *never* be misused, not even by governments... and obviously it won't *ever* polarise anyone.
Exactly. The video has extremely poor focus due to not explaining blockchain and instead giving a bunch of examples of companies that in my opinion look like BS. Gives blockchain a back name.
3:50 why would you demonitize Kurzgesagt videos?
cause it made the AI have an existential crisis
Logic and reason are forbidden!
...I guess?
Controversial topics are interesting topics. If we all agree on anyting and everything, what's the point? Besides, 'controversial' is a bit vauge. ANYTHING can be controversial form a referee's decision in a sports event to an election to which resolution is best for YT videos to if a song is any good ... and the list goes on and on. Picking the brain with stimulating topics and arguments is good, and THAT is why YT put that in theri ToS. A dumb audience makes you more $$$.
"cause it made the AI have an existential crisis" hahahahaha
+Stefano Papaleo Right. Controversial means controversial to THEM. Count dankula is a great example. He was convicted of the crime of being grossly offensive, but the judges ruling is grossly offensive to me, so why isn't the judge also convicting himself? It proves that it's not being grossly offensive that is the problem, it is being offensive to the sensitivities of a specific ideology that has power right now. They just couch it in terms of people "being offensive" in some general sense. But that is a lie. Like you said, everything is offensive to someone.
This video doesn't give Ethereum the credit it deserves. Ethereum started the smart contract revolution and many of the mentioned projects are literally on Ethereum. Yet this video mentions it a single time to criticize it then lauds platforms that don't even exist yet and are literally following down the path that Ethereum blazed. It's seriously myopic. People in the Ethereum space have literally been talking about the exact subject matter in this video for years now and now this video emerges and acts like this is all new and Ethereum isn't even important. Sad.
CANT WAIT TO SEE YOU LIVE IN THE DUBAI BLOCKCHAIN SUMMIT! So Glad you're coming!!
I Like ColdFusion's channel so much. the way Dagogo's speak, the information's telling order, and the music. I even automatically play ColdFusion videos automatically when I'm on my bedroom. its just so good. Thank you Dagogo.
It’s not nearly as sinple as it is laid out in in this video. One example is smart contracts, and the statement that there will be “no 3rd parties”; Hardly any agreement of significance can be solved with smart contracts as it is today. In addition, regulation is entirely ignored in these thoughts, and that is not likely to be actually beneficial to society.
A last side comment is about youtube competitors with no ads, no ‘censorship’, and with users getting paid - How is that a viable idea? Think of a single site, or place today where there are no rules or regulations - it does not work like that - you don’t use them. And as soon as you find out that you need moderation, you also find out that you need money to do that, so you’ll stop paying users, or start displaying ads, If not both, and what you have now is a less popular, less viable youtube clone.
Another one with a working brain! Yeah... let's just ignore laws because... no one will notice, right? Or human nature. You can put in code whatever you want. Unless, it is really something truely automatic and not human-depenant, any other type of service - from pizza delivery to a company merger - is out of the question. Or all of a sudden we've become so good we do not litigate, find excuses, make mistakes, are alwyas honest and agree on everything? The contract can be as smart as you like but if the parties involved are not... good luck with that.
the "no censorship" thing,does this mean you can put up illegal stuff like child porn and all lots of sick stuff?
In theory yes
[TL,DR]Humble yourself and be understanding. There are people more stupid than me... or you - Who wil take your words and belive them at face value.
It's hard to believe that this topic could be met with such hostility - but, I do suppose the earth is flat now, isn't it? Perhaps this could have been resolved with a question, as obnoxious as that resolution tactic is. The question/s I'd like to propose are not ones that I have any higher understanding of, I cannot answer myself. I do know of what I do not know - and I think this should be used to understand our world and be the basis for how we form/present our views.
Enough of my big (dumb) head; I ask you, what do you know of the methods used to encrypt, share, and validate the "blocks" in the chain? Do you have an understanding of what is required to corrupt the chain or to inject the chain with false data? Do you have any idea how automated/controlled generation of programming code(machine readable language) is done? - If not, perhaps you have used Adobe Flash, "" Dreamweaver, Visual Studio, or maybe Unity? Can you imagine this software using using something like a cloud network to validate it's self?
Have you ever played a pirated game that seamlessly interacted with the Steam online services as though it were an unaltered version of that game? How long do you think it would last before, at the very least, your Steam services shut down. The BlockChain "as a service" would be one with many rules. Like Steam, the service might use it's rules as algorithms to ensure the service works. In another likeness it is easy to assume that any one persons personal computer network is filled with security holes and is easy to break into.
I find it novel to think that the entirety of written legal law could be pushed into a legal BlockChain Contract service. That it might use its software to reference the relevant law and return a result of "level of adherence". The service could then push the new contract into the chain(Or have already done so for validation) and ask for a finalisation, a "Tick" of approval from both parties.
I believe the place you are talking about, where everything could be posted and nothing was ever peer reviewed for legitimacy was 4-Chan, or perhaps a 4-Chan like clone hanging off of the Tor network. This is not that network.
@Stefano Papaleo. Stop making these judgements. You ARE an important person. You are important for what you can do, and will do, and have done to help those around you. You are important for all the changes you will make that improve your world, and the ones you share it with. You may express these opinions with these strong feelings, and it may feel as though you have thrust forward with your sword, but these views leave you impotent in my eyes. Use those feeling to fire you on, be open minded and passionate at the same time, and go deeper/discover more about these subjects that grip you to feel this way.
Yeah of course and why not a banana-blockchain?
I'm not sure that blockchain can be put in every fucking thing, maybe I'm not seeing the bigger picture and I'm wrong, but, to me blockchain makes sense only for a few applications. An example can be: make easier trade, giving guarantees to both parties.
A blockchain Wikipedia is such a bad idea to me, and all the features of it can be achieved creating a site where you sign in giving your data like where are you from...
It is funny how institutions are desperately trying to dissociate blockchains and cryptocurrencies. A blockchain is more secure with more nodes on the network. People need incentives to run nodes to validate transactions and keep the network decentralized by making a 51 percent attack computationally expensive. There is a game theory at play here. The "private" blockchains that banks and other institutions are building are not blockchain but a slightly altered version of a distributed database with worst transaction time.
exactly
boom!
They are still clinging to their precious centralization. Real decentralization is disruptive and threatens careers as never before. Go ETH!
Pretty much accurate except it's the mining that needs to be incentiveized to protect form attack, not node operation. But yeah, blockchain by itself is useless. Two full years after we started hearing 'blockchain is the real innovation' there still isn't a single project that uses 'blockchain' without a token (or coin) incentivizing the system. In fact, now in late 2019, its very very rare to hearing anyone repeating this 'muh blockchain without crypto-currency' idea.
Very well compiled 4-part video series detailing what blockchain is and how it works. Imagination espouses a near limitless possibility surrounding blockchain's future.
*_TRUST !!_*
Bright, Clear, Concise, Relevant, Ready, and always High Levels coming forth from your Source.
Most of the current blockchain projects are using blockchain just because ICOs (were) are easy way to get funding.
Answer these questions to see if project really benefits by using blockchain:
- does data need to be immutable?
- do we need trust-less distributed database?
Also, I highly question all the projects where user data is stored on block chain because of GDPR.
The new -pedia sounds like another data mining company.
Wonderful video my friend, keep up the good work. I find these videos very interesting, specially being a content creator myself
ColdFusion will be the best channel now and in the future
My name is Crallo and I study software engineering. I was wondering why my project combat professor is so into blockchains. He basically shoved blockchains down our throats but now I understand why. Thank you for the dope and informative video.
no wonder, it's sponsored
One of the best channel on UA-cam, hands down! I really appreciate the time you put into each videos, keep up the good work!
No one caught it?
lol. "Demonitision"
I love your videos, but that got me xD
I caught it too but i let it pass
Congratulations on the collab with Dubai’s world trade centre!
Dagogo, you should lunch a new series on this channel teaching people on how to Search/Synthesize/Present information effectively : People need it every day, you master it, hence the perfect match. Invest in that skill, diversify the content.
That's amazing, the block chain is touching almost every aspect of life. Which means it's benefits are going to reach everyone irrespective of socioeconomic status. Technology should reach everyone and block chain technology is one of those. Thanks for broadening my thoughts.
Arun S Kumar Bitcoin just needs a good hook and it'll go mainstream overnight.. the price of coins will increase and say goodbye to regular banks over the next decade.
Bitcoin is the internet of value and the only blockchain you will need. Bitcoin is the only blockchain that is decentral and censorship resistent! Blockchain without bitcoin is like intranet without the internet! Bitcoin is the thing, forget about all the i print my own money with a new central blockchain bullshit!!! We have one internet and wie will have one blockchain the bitcoin blockchain!!! All the crap sold by scamers how tray to sell the noobs there shit toke of no value! You can do all of that with bitcoin with sidecahins and lightning network. How wanst to buy 100 diffrend tokens that gose up and down in value just 4 one usecase? Bullshit they will make all on bitcoin The internet of value 1 token 4 all stuff. A globel decentral store of value money with the name bitcoin. Fuck that blockchain token bullshit!!!
yep, speculator will be triggered at this point
It won't.
No way will the people in power give up so easily.
They will just buy up most of the ASIC's and GPU and create massive farms.
That way they will be in control of the majority of the chain. If they own the majority then they effectively own it all.
this video is highly biased towards blockchain though, it makes it sound like a god sent solution, yet there is no truly untamperable technology. Just look at the hacked history of bitcoin. Blockchain is affected just as similarly.
You forgot to mention the best UA-cam alternative: Bittubers com
it crashed so hard. is it dead? lol
@@EltonL No, they are developping the Bittubers platform and great Mobile apps right now...when the mobile apps will be available this thing will fly again and Moon!
Hold up. Paid to watch? Viewers are paid to watch? What’s the catch? Is it a subscription service or something? That sounds too good to be true. I don’t really understand how that works.
steemit.com
^^^^
your computer during the time you watch the video would be used to mine crypto currencies perhaps ?
Think of it like this: whenever you watch a video, there’s an ad. The company of that ad pays youtube. Imagine you watch the ad on a non-private company like youtube, the company either pays the content creator or you, the viewer.
Sebastian Brian But there would be no ads, unless my ears deceived me.
The coolest phrase in this Channel is "Hi welcome to another coldfusion video!"
Coldfusion is my role model when it comes to video editing except my niche is crypto technology.
Daegogo man! Thank you for this video. It's very educational.
There is no Blockchain without Bitcoin.
U mean there's no Bitcoin without blockchain
Blockchain wasn't invented for Bitcoin. It was invented in 1995. Then went mostly unused until 2008 when shatoshi nakamoto used it to make Bitcoin. It was then when people realised that its uses. Blockchain was already invented but Bitcoin made it famous
taking over your money
And as per usual, brilliant. It looks like block chain is the future of any kind of financial transactions between people, so no more faceless organisations profiting of your hard work and efforts.
I understand that this technology is fantastic, but I think you are overreacting and amplifying the benefits too much, while not adressing the cons of the Blockchain.
Agreed, this is why I am waiting for a tech unlike Blockchain that is solving all its issues while maintaining the benefits.
I'm new to this tech. What are some of the drawbacks of Blockchain?
@Pegasi -- Speed is a major issue with blockchain and if you plan on being fast, you slowly become either expensive to operate or having to use expensive nodes and becoming slightly centralized. The point of blockchain was to remain fully decentralized and it can't manage do that and at the same time managed high speed.
Supremax67
Wow, speed is a huge deal on networks especially today. I'm stunned he didn't mention this
@Pegasi -- There are competing techs that wants to fix blockchain but themselves they are not blockchains, they use a different approach. So far the most promising one is the gossip about gossip protocol
ẞest UA-camr!
TechKErala *sest* youtuber? :/
Pewdiepie has something to say about that😂
TechKErala im not evven german but im offended that youre using double s as B...
No it is 3:50 kurzgesagt
Kurzgesagt has good animation but the overall content is SJW bullsh*t
Would definitely like you to go more in depth about Tangle, and how it compares to traditional blockchain.
Forget Tangle, better tech coming around the corner. Anything that is blockchain based is slow or not as secure as it should be. Don't get me wrong, promising technology but we were due for an upgrade.
It has widen my perspectives on BLOCK CHAIN inspires more curiosity to understand more and also learn more
Wow the idea of paying viewers to mot only watch but rate creators videos is a great idea. It rewards everyone.
BUY BITCOIN
Yes, BUY BITCOIN, at 7 transactions a seconds worldwide!!
It looks like everyone sees only postive outcomes from this. Big multinational companies, in particular those related to finance, mainly will benefit of block chain, alllow them less and less tranasparency in transactions, and authororities less and less power of supervision and control of criminal activities. Ask yourself why Dubai is the first to embrace this...?
Another negative aspect is the loss of a huge amount of jobs, cutting the middle man, means that, so, yes it's true if you are a businessman you can have finally your opportunity, but for the majority of earth population, having an employment, due also the direction of automatization, will be extremely difficult, most of people will end up working for big multinationals.
If we don't think to a different source of income, who will buy product and services?
um its complete transparency. the ledger is public dude. do more research government will be run on blockchain. our votes will count. each person will matter.
@@myles5158 nah i used use block chain to buy drugs online and some stolen credit cards (no bank could report this to police cuz its decentralized ). I know about bitcoin since 2013 -2014 when dark net was in early stages, and to buy illegal stuff you first needed to buy bitcoin(then it was a lot cheaper) this is how i learned about block chain and bitcoin(back then it was harder to find info about this topic).About the "complete transparency" you dont see the name of the person so for example i sell drugs and i made a lot of money lets say 50 million$, then i what to transfer this money to another acc (a bank will imediatley see and block the transaction) but with bitcoin nah bc no one knows who am i .So maybe i am bill gates and 50 million is just pocket money. So the transaction will go. But to be more safe we (dark net community) have bitcoin mixer, or etherium mixer (dosent matter) its a money (bitcoin) laundering machine that dose like the name says. Bitcoin mixer its a new super way of money laundering and this is done with block chain "complete transparency". In conclusion my point is block chain is Criminal haven.
the guy goes >> pay me money, i will make a video as you like! oh no Dubai :(
Brilliant work Deagogo!! I’ve been one of your early subscribers. Thanks for helping me get in sync with what is happening around the world.
Definitely this video widened my prospective of Blockchain
a decentralised, open source youtube alternative would be great. don't need this blockchain.
Can't do decentralized without also using something like the blockchain. Any decentralization without some form of security will be too easily hackable, hence why big companies like Google have centralized servers. To be fair, Google hasn't move into the decentralized area yet.
Supremax67 • social networks like mastodon or diaspora* are decentralised and don't need blockchain, do they? I am thinking of sth like GNU MediaGoblin or PeerTube, though I am not familar with them.
And then Skynet takes over the world, end of story
That is AI not Crypto
AwakeningTVII, yh true but if you have a decentralised autonomous network for AI like SingularityNET, then maybe... Skynet = blockchain + AI... maybe worth investing in for now though xD
Blockchain should not be compared to the Internet. It's more like Email.
what happens with blockchain if internet goes down?
@@alexradu1921 the internet is a network of networks. There is no way to shut all of them down. For example, bitcoin also works over shortwave radio and satellites. So at least for truly decentralized blockchains (bitcoin might be the only example of this), it will continue to run.
@@plasticman2011 Though Bitcoin is becoming more and more centralized as mining pools continue to expand (some of which already control 25% of the computing power used by bitcoin).
@@JonSnow-sd1hl actually, that is a common misconception. Mining pools don't have direct control of the vast majority of the mining equipment in the pool. This means bitcoin is mich more decentralized than it would appear if you just look at pools. The owners of the mining equipment can switch to a different pool very quickly if a pool operator acts in an unexpected way.
This video has widened my perspective of blockchain!
Nice to see that coldfusion is a fan of synthwave. I already had my suspicions in earler videos where you used some clips that are associated with synthwave track compilations, but when i heard lazerhawk-so far away, i knew for sure 😅 keep up the good work exposing the masses to this great genre of music 👍
"...andd the first one is demonetization."
*ad pops up*
lol wow
Lmao
7:30 every single thing he said can be done without the blockchain, that guy is clueless.
The point is not it cannot be done without BC, the point is it could be and should be done on BC.
@@Carthodon
Could this be your opinion based on your level of knowledge.? Please, this is a serious question and not at all intended to be facetious. I know virtually nothing of blockchain, perhaps the reason why my query may seem as an odd one. I truly do not know. So, for someone such as myself, one in possession of so very little knowledge in this matter, does this video hold any different value.? Meaning, is it a good starting place or is the information simply bad.?
Centralized: Requires trusted party to hold data. Decentralized: Trusted party isn't required. Enormous electricity is consumed, all data is duplicated on each node requiring a factor of storage space for each miner. If the database is 100GB and there are 10,000 miners, we now need 100GB*10,000 in storage. If a ledger activity requires 60W, we now need 10,000*60W of electricity to perform the activity. A centralized system only requires 100GB and 60W. Can someone explain to me how this is necessarily better? Decentralized is FAR less efficient than centralized despite maybe being more trustworthy. It's also vulnerable to quantum computing hackers, 51% attacks by mining farms, and individual nodes have no power against large mining pools. Government computer systems and electric consumption far outweighs any node in his Mom's basement. So the system becomes centralized anyway. Out of all the blockchain prophets out there, none of them have convinced me on why this is one of the most important inventions in human history. Try to explain it to me from a technological standpoint.
About the storage problem... i never heard that before. where do i find the infos about it ??
@@ameliaashford6131 It's inherent to the technology.
Dagogo, your channel is a thing of beauty!
Always thumbs up to coldfusion tv👍
360p squad?
Yee
Tan Yong Kang that is cause is recently uploaded
Tan Yong Kang 480p😎
got it in 1080 here :D
1080p squad
The irony of the ad's were so frustrating...... ugh!!
I have saved so much money in fees by simly using cryptocurrencys.
My bank charges me about 0.60US$ plus 1.2% of the value of the transaction in fees. By using bitcoin (assuming the mempool is empty) I pay at most 0.03US$
Incomeking
That can happen but then you just wait another day and it will be up again
It's too volatile. It is okay for transferring money but there are so many quicker coins. Also the scalability sucks.
lightning network dude...
In 2011?
I use NANO, it’s fast and free!
Awesome video on blockchain. Anyone should be able to watch this and understand it better. Thanks for sharing!
These days the generation of my father (born around 1960) is talking about how they got their first Commodore and how they learnt to program simple games like Snake.
I see the future where I'll tell my children about how I discovered the idea of Blockchain and how it fascinated me, so I learned about it during it's process of becoming a fundamental part of technology and our daily life.
"How about something more insteresting like QIHAD!!!!" lmao
Can anyone suggest me a video or article to understand what is Block chain technology?????
Zeeshan Niazi yeah cold fusion
Look up "three blue one brown blockchain" on UA-cam, and check out this article...
medium.com/@matteozago/why-the-web-3-0-matters-and-you-should-know-about-it-a5851d63c949
Those are decent places to start, imo.
he made a video before
I have seen half a dozen videos explaining what Blockchain is and how it works, and I still couldn't tell you.
Haiku Metzger once i thought of it like an accounting system that instantly updates and is sent to thousands of people periodically it made more sense to me. That's the decentralized aspect anyway. Also the ledger can't be hacked because you would basically have to hack computer simultaneously who has a copy of the ledger, typically thousands or millions of computers
“Here are a list of middle mans that can help you cut the middle man”
Yup. That’s about it.
banks
Not really. You must understand first how is that Blockchain actually works. Remember it is a DECENTRALIZED system; it has a "logo" and sort of a "brand name" or something, but they are projects that are OPEN SOURCE (just like the internet itself), so everyone can participate and collaborate in whatever the projects needs to be successful (including marketing). Developers and investors, basically HODL (take a look at that ;) the cryptocurrency (coin) related to the project, in which is basically reflected the valued of the project itself (just like the price of a company's stock). Thus they believe the project will become succesful as many people will create demand for the coin as it is useful (e.g Bitcoin is better than using a bank for international transactions) and therfore making the price going up. "The higher the demand, higher the price" Basic economic principle. Well I hope this helps everyone understand a liltle bit more about the topic.
Daniel Giraldo
Thanks for that details explantation.
FYI: I am a Software Engineer and have deployed few Dapps in EVM.
Firstly, in order to for you to build a system it involves many components including but not limited to Client (iOS Android), API Server (Component that your client can talk to) Your Database and the Dapp (Smart contract).
A Smart contract is only a component of the system which is decentralised everything else is not.
An organization does not open source all its components. even if it does the organization has full control of the pull request it can accept.
Smart contracts are not like-real world contracts. Smart contracts can always be updated without you ever knowing it. (Just google it)
in conclusion.
Blockchain is a solution that is looking for a problem.
@Nitin Muthyala -- If you are a Software Engineer, then you should be taking a closer look at Hashgraph. The way blockchain is designed, many flaws will never be fixed, so they came up with a solution to this 10 years problem.
"A Smart contract is only a component of the system which is decentralised everything else is not"
Where did you get that? Decentralized databases is actually pretty much the core of the concept. You are software engineer but it seems Blockchain is not your field.
What he described about "Everipedia" is what "Quora" app does today but without blockchain technology.😊 Everipedia is the evolution of Quora to become more secure and user friendly.
As always, great work Dagogo. I've been following you for a while but this is the first time I comment since you always allow me to understand what's going on on the edge. Thanks!
Make a video about IKEA founder Ingvar Kamprad, please :)
Love your videos from Sweden
I AM TO OLD FOR THIS.Frank68
I think so too when I hear comments like "the most important technology ever invented".
I feel the same way and I'm 25.
But are you too old for this?
as some of us r really old not to worry it will just take us a little longer to understand SO KEEP AT IT
I love how the boomer posting in all caps is actually a real thing and not just a meme
Don't take it personal Frank! Boomers might be funny on the internet but they're good enough people. Cheers
13:33 arcade city no longer available, maybe scam. I have my doubts about the content in this video
This channel is too good for us
I'm not going to lie, this made me fcking cry. It's wonderful to see that the world as a whole is taking steps to be fair. Whether its for themselves or for others, its still a whole big load of awesome. Thank you.
what are the disadvantages of blockchain? i only hear/d advantages.
The disadvantage is that governments will outlaw decentralized coins / services and enforce their own monopoly that steals all the benefits from the common people.
Scalability is the biggest driver of this technology's development. The challenge of decentralizing the state of a piece of data by distributing it among a network of computers, while also keeping the whole thing sufficiently responsive such that transactions require low work and occur quickly, while at the same time keeping the whole network's data safe is the big challenge. The reason it's a challenge, is because it's a hard problem to solve that's comparatively easy to solve in centralized networks.
51 percent attack
@Jan Daniel Alcantra -- It is slow, very slow. None of the networks are Asyncronous Byzantine Fault Tolerant (which is the highest form of security) while remaining fast. But don't worry, that technology is just around the corner, and it addresses all the issues of blockchain.
As for the 51 percent attack is not a thing, between attacking 1/3 of the network and setting up a firewall, you can disrupt the entire blockchain network. Anyone who talks about the 51% attack has no clue how it works.
Medical Records??? What kind of value are medical records. All this sounds to much like George Orwell's 1984. All this cryptocurrency crap will one day collapse I just hope you're not heavily invested because you will lose every penny. Give me something intrinsic such as gold or silver a useful material.
You will crash
dude, u cant see a good oppurtunity when its staring u in the face huh? do u see whats happening right now. big institutions are jumping on board for crypto. thats tjhe money aspect. but blockchain is the future move with it or get left behind. do you know how many millionaires bitcoin made? do you know how many millionaires will be made from blockchain? dude open your eyes.
BS
With each one of these videos I feel like I'm closer and closer to understanding what (a?) blockchain is, but I still feel like I don't fully comprehend it
Blockchain technology is only revolutionary when it's truly decentralized and open source. If that's not the case, then any application of blockchain technology can only be described as a really poor choice of database. The true revolution here, is that open source blockchain projects hold the promise of delivering truly decentralized protocols and platforms, which cannot be censored or controlled. This is huge!
I would like to know more technical details on how it's gonna work. For example, the blockchain wikipedia. Will all the articles be distributed among all the users and there will be no centralized server? So that's why it's so special? If this is how it's gonna work then, I see a problem of storing this data on individuals' computers the same as storing a history of all the bitcoin operations. But maybe I don't understand it correctly.
Łukasz Jagodziński look at it as huge raid. I would say
As a user you'll just access the data as you do Wikipedia or any website. The only computers the whole blockchain is distributed to are the people running the nodes, which could be you if you're up to the task.
I'm a programmer and some time ago I've tried creating a website using blockchain and experience wasn't so great. So blockchain Wikipedia will work similarly and I'm curious how many data will be stored on individual nodes and if people are willing to store such data. I assume that there won't be so many people. You can look at it in a similar way how torrents work. If a file is very old then there is little chance of having any seeds. Maybe I'm wrong but I think that for 99% services there will always be a need for the central server.
7:23 face reveal
👌
oh lord, who believes in his BS hype. The concepts of ledger systems, temporal databases and distributed systems are old. The current techniques for blockchain used in bitcoin and ethereum don't scale. There's serious technical challenges that haven't been solved. There are newer frameworks trying to fix those architectural limitations, but they aren't proven. The biggest flaw of current approach to blockchain is they're too computationally heavy. The newer approaches claim they solve some of these issues, but they haven't proven themselves. The claimed of privacy and anonymity are stupid for several reasons. A full proof anonymous system will make money laundering trivial and therefore benefit organized criminals more than the average person. Organized crime can be the Russian Mafia or JPM Chase. So yeah, we need to make it easier for them to screw the rest of us. I worked in financial industry for several years on regulations. Many of those laws exist to protect the public from bad people and organizations. A truly anonymous system doesn't actually protect your privacy as long as some activity you do is publicly visible. To have 100% privacy, you'd have to move to the north pole, not buy anything with money or interact with people in public space. What people need isn't true privacy. What they want is for businesses to act ethically and abuse the data they collect. Blockchain might become more useful if the technical challenges are resolved. Until then, most of the hype is from people looking to make a quick buck from suckers.
A company has already solved the technological challenges and they are launching their public network this year.
Another great video as always brother! You're genuinly one of the only youtubers who i watch *EVERY SINGLE UPLOAD AND LOVE IT*
Forget about bitcoin? Bitcoin started it, it was the first blockchain ever created.
Please talk about hashgraph, it’s also really promising
Sage Akporherhe hashgraph?
It has many limitations not expressed in the whitepaper, really not promising as it seems for now.
hashgraph is patented and owned by one person. probably not going to happen. However the idea is there.
it is also still just a whitepaper
I love ignorant people, let's see who got this wrong....
@Nanocryk -- You say it has many limitations but don't name any, don't spread FUD....
@A c -- Oh how ignorant you are, with their announcement of their Hedera Public network 1.0, the technology will be wide open and license free. Stop spreading FUD.
@Christo -- Oh how ignorant you are, they been running a private version for the last 3 years successfully and in the middle of completing their public network which they have successfully tested. More than a dozen companies as partnered up with them for both versions.
I own several crypto currency and I own nothing in terms of Hashgraph assets, so when you hear a guy like me give a positive feedback on their product, it's as unbiased as it can possibly get. Unlike you guys which probably owns crypto coins and would have much to lose if your currency would go down.
Only reviews that can be fully trusted are the unbiased one. You speak ill on a project you are fully invested or you speak good about a project you don't own any shares or assets, anything else and it could be considered being BIAS.
how can you say blockchain is bigger than bitcoin? You need some education - blockchain is only possible when the security of the blockchain is sound i.e Bitcoin. Your channel has lost my respect
Well it could be another crypto or just be used privately
ShadowMaster 45 we supposedly live in a world where we backup claims with evidence, thus forming a logical opinion.
Now we make claims based upon unreasonable scenarios and argue against logical outcomes with the premise “but it can happen, you cant deny there is a chance”.
People of reason go by that which is more likely, and it is UNLIKELY to presuppose that any crypto or blockchain to date has come close to the secure properties of bitcoin. A blockchain is defined predominantly by its secure decentralised nature, which cannot be attributed to any private network, unless by private you mean to suggest networks like the lightning network which many assume to be a private side chain- when in-fact is a remarkable decentralised innovation built on-top of the bitcoins SECURE protocol.
One video I had to listen to twice to wrap my head around the size of this thing. Crazy...
Unfortunately he didn't do blockchain the full package. Many issues with the tech that won't be solved until something better is coming, and that solution should be some time this year.
This is what we needed for so long!
Great videode Dagogo, wish you all the best at the Future Blockchain Summit, congratulations!
Notification bell well deserved
1:12 The easiest definition I can think of to describe blockchain is Identify and Exchange. Decentralization to me is just a matter of good, better, or best ways to identify and exchange within any given system.
Block chain is in a nascent stage.
It will be wrong to comment negative about it.
Thank you for mentioning Tangle and IOTA at 0:38
I learned a lot here thanks. I really like you channel. Coldfusion.
Great research and presentation as always Dagogo, I really appreciate having content like yours available to keep myself updated on such interesting topics, keep up the good work!