Guys below (or above, depending), don't just 'study' this for a test, try to also take something from it to implement in your own classes/language learning. A lot of ppl in my country just study all this methodology, perhaps say it is interesting, but all they ever teach is grammar again, thinking it can get anybody fluent.
It wasn't Michael Lewsis the intiator of this movement,but he summarised and shaped the ideas of a long - standing tradition which is located in the mid 13th century.
Very clear summary - but I feel that enthusiasts for new approaches run the danger of throwing out the baby with the bathwater (to use a couple of lexical chunks!). Clearly there is a lot to learn from the Lexical Approach. It fits with what we know about the value of chunking to overcome the limitations of short-term memory and speed up processing. But that surely doesn't mean we have to entirely reject working directly with grammar? There are still patterns such as, say, agreement between article and noun, formation of plurals, use of the correct indirect object etc that would benefit from some judicious and imaginative drilling? There is no logical or practical reason to see the two methods as mutually exclusive.
I have a hard time understanding approaches but you explained it so well! Thanks so much for this video!
Guys below (or above, depending), don't just 'study' this for a test, try to also take something from it to implement in your own classes/language learning. A lot of ppl in my country just study all this methodology, perhaps say it is interesting, but all they ever teach is grammar again, thinking it can get anybody fluent.
Informative and helpful plus a great explanation, thanks for sharing
It wasn't Michael Lewsis the intiator of this movement,but he summarised and shaped the ideas of a long - standing tradition which is located in the mid 13th century.
Very clear summary - but I feel that enthusiasts for new approaches run the danger of throwing out the baby with the bathwater (to use a couple of lexical chunks!).
Clearly there is a lot to learn from the Lexical Approach. It fits with what we know about the value of chunking to overcome the limitations of short-term memory and speed up processing.
But that surely doesn't mean we have to entirely reject working directly with grammar? There are still patterns such as, say, agreement between article and noun, formation of plurals, use of the correct indirect object etc that would benefit from some judicious and imaginative drilling?
There is no logical or practical reason to see the two methods as mutually exclusive.
Fantastic video Jaime. Thank you! I really love incorporating the lexical approach into my classroom. I see and teach chunks of language all the time.
thanks for this clear explanation, my last final exam at college is about this and some other theories. I'll be sitting for it next Monday!!!
Thank you bro . Your voice is so sweat and warm. 😊
Good explaination
epico amigo, ta nashe tu video gracias bro
Thank you, you have been helpful
Very clear explanation. Thanks.
great video. thanks
Yes, thank you.
thank u so much
The man in the picture...he's a writer, Michael Lewis has another aspect...
I really enjoyed
I think You got wrong Michael Lewis picture.
thanks but i could not get it at all