BREAKING NEWS: Huge Changes Coming to Elite Dangerous

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 чер 2024
  • We’ve just had some very late breaking news from Frontier about some sweeping changes coming to Elite Dangerous very soon that will fundamentally change how some players interact with the game and almost certainly how some people feel about the game.
    We’ve had almost no time to digest the information that we’ve had but it's such important stuff that we thought we’d get it out to you as soon as we humanly could.
    and we’ll give you our initial thoughts on all of this at the end.
    =================================
    Support our work on PATREON : / thebuurpit
    Donate directly through PAYPAL: paypal.me/BuurPitPaypal
    =================================
    VKB Sim
    vkb-sim.pro/
    The Buur Pit uses, recommends and is partnered with flight hardware manufacturer VKB Sim.
    Use the code “BUURPIT” to get a 5% discount off their products.
    =================================
    Generally Useful Links
    The Odyssey Materials Helper App (must have tool for Ody Engineering):
    github.com/jixxed/ed-odyssey-...
    Quizengines Odyssey Map Guide (O.M.G.)
    www.quizengine.co.uk/omg/
    CMDR Greybeard Seawolf’s Guardian Site Maps
    outlandindustriesorg.wordpres...
    CMDR Radiumio’s Guide to Guardian Unlocks
    imgur.com/gallery/bJI8t1v
    Mechans AX Guides
    / @astyrrean
    Thargoid Spire Sites
    docs.google.com/spreadsheets/...
    The AXI (Anti Xeno Ops)
    www.antixenoinitiative.com/
    The Anti-Xeno Academy - AX tutorial video
    • Anti-Xeno Academy: Lea...
    Defence Council of Humanity Discord (coalition of coalitions)
    / discord
    DCoH Overwatch Website
    dcoh.watch/
    The Post Disaster Evacuation Service Discord (station evac)
    / discord
    Operation Ida (station repairs)
    www.operationida.com/
    EDSM Expeditions Page
    www.edsm.net/en/expeditions
    The Galactic Exploration Catalogue
    edastro.com/poi/
    Viajero’s Router Port Forwarding Guide
    forums.frontier.co.uk/threads...
    Console Copy Portal Details
    forums.frontier.co.uk/threads...
    Frontiers Elite Dangerous 4.0 FAQ
    www.elitedangerous.com/news/e...
    Play Odyssey Without A PC - NVIDIA GeForce Now
    www.nvidia.com/geforce-now
    Operation: Wych Hunt Discord
    / discord
    Azimuth Biotech Discord Community
    / discord
    =================================
    JOIN & FOLLOW us on :
    Twitter: / cmdr_buur
    Twitter: / cmdrrheeney
    Facebook: / thebuurpit
    =================================
    In Game Squadron “The Buur Pit”
    inara.cz/squadron/5447/
    =================================
    #elitedangerous #elitedangerousodyssey #trailer #gameplay #elitedangerousnews #thargoids #update #cinematic #FDEV #frontier #elitedangerousgameplay #space #spacesim #spacegame #spacesimulator
    =================================
    Music: Epidemic Sound
    =================================
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 857

  • @BasdeBakker
    @BasdeBakker Місяць тому +241

    For me, tweaking a new ship build in Edsy to perfection and then going out and building it is as much fun as flying the finished ship. So I have no intention of buying pre-built ships. I have no problem with others doing so as long as they won't be better than what you can build in-game.

    • @Majima_Nowhere
      @Majima_Nowhere Місяць тому +6

      Right? Playing with different builds is my favorite thing to do in Elite. It's why I'm excited for the new ships.

    • @kamirupl
      @kamirupl Місяць тому +8

      I think/hope that these pre-built ships will have ''entry builds'' allowing to get in to activities they are meant for, with plenty of room for in game upgrades.

    • @Sylusssss
      @Sylusssss Місяць тому +4

      After doing it for years I dread making something new just because the trip for experimentals even if I do have what I need pinned
      Hopefully they allow pinning those as well some day

    • @cmdrsesslaine8701
      @cmdrsesslaine8701 Місяць тому +1

      this o7

    • @smokybutton4928
      @smokybutton4928 Місяць тому +6

      Lad me translate what Frontier says.... Erhh.. We are going to put as unavoidable pay to win the shop, and make engineering much more grindy.... So we extort as many money from you players ad possible

  • @sgoalder
    @sgoalder Місяць тому +28

    Doesn’t sound like it changes the way I play my game. Thanks for the update!

  • @Cirrusrunecian
    @Cirrusrunecian Місяць тому +150

    2024: Buy an upgraded AX ship for Arx.
    2025: Early access to Raxxla for only $70

  • @DoctyrEvil
    @DoctyrEvil Місяць тому +99

    I think we should be patient and see what the details are before passing judgement.
    If they re-balance engineering a bit, I don't see why offering prebuilt ships is a problem as long as the ships and modules aren't exclusive to the store.
    Early access to the new Python shouldn't really matter much, considering it's likely to be a sidegrade to the current python, with 2 extra utility slots, more module room but also likely larger and less maneuverable. (or maybe a dedicated combat version like a Mamba)

    • @alexzk3
      @alexzk3 Місяць тому +3

      I guess "re-balance" will be in such the way that you will want to spend some ARX packaged ships. Otherwise in has no sense

    • @Seegson-je9je
      @Seegson-je9je Місяць тому +6

      I agree on principle that we should indeed be patient for more details, since I don't think one can even be interested in Elite without a great abundance of innate patience, but I'm definitely passing some early judgment as well. New ships have been the main thing I've wanted since fleet carriers, so having those announced out of the blue was of great interest to me, and came with the potential idea that they were starting to try to do something good and sane for their spaceship sim; but now there's immediately this whiplash of counterevidence. The fact that they're (a) just variants of existing ships rather than something original, as far as we currently know, and (b) they're asking for real money for early access to these variants, tastes strongly of desperation in the waning years of the game.
      I agree that in terms of gameplay the new Python shouldn't affect much, being more of a side-grade than anything as far as we know, but one must ask themselves why then are they charging Arx/doll-hairs for early access to it? Multiple months of early access no less? I'd reserve judgment in the case of other games I've played where the devs have built up goodwill about how they handle these types of decisions, but F-Dev is past that point for a lot of people. Not necessarily everyone, I'm sure people less jaded about F-Dev (if not Elite itself) can have more faith in how they handle the new ships, but I personally find it very funny that the first bit of good news in a long time is accompanied by this pay-to-fly business.

    • @CrimsonGamer99
      @CrimsonGamer99 Місяць тому +1

      It has a fourth large hardpoint too.

    • @DoctyrEvil
      @DoctyrEvil Місяць тому

      @@CrimsonGamer99 exactly. Let the pay! :)

    • @Fingle_Fleetfoot
      @Fingle_Fleetfoot Місяць тому

      For me all boats have already been sunk by Fdev, I think this is just more desperate cash making. This is the sort of stuff that should have been done YEARS ago. There are even still day one bugs that have never been fixed I am told. I would have to see MAJOR content updates to get any interest back. At this point, I hope they fail, I think they are as a business anyway. That way we can hope that the IP is picked up by a company that can do a decent job of it.

  • @crazygolm
    @crazygolm Місяць тому +49

    Thanks for putting together this video in a hurry! I'm going to reserve proper judgement and avoid jumping to conclusions until I see any of this in game. Hype trains and hate trains alike are not rational.

    • @CMDRStealth
      @CMDRStealth Місяць тому +2

      I think people need to consider before getting pissy that these prebuilt ships are being made by FDEV which makes them more Pay 2 Lose than P2W.

    • @Majima_Nowhere
      @Majima_Nowhere Місяць тому +1

      ​@@CMDRStealthThat's my thinking as well, the FDev-approved ship builds are likely to be boring, generic NPC builds.

    • @Beer_Dad1975
      @Beer_Dad1975 Місяць тому +1

      Irrational, but fun!

  • @MinistryOfMagic_DoM
    @MinistryOfMagic_DoM Місяць тому +58

    I'm commander redacted and this is my favorite video on this topic.

    • @stab74
      @stab74 Місяць тому +1

      Nani?

    • @myaantares4036
      @myaantares4036 Місяць тому +2

      I've seen that name tagged on many a planet, Cmdr!

  • @Kestrel1971
    @Kestrel1971 Місяць тому +68

    Elite's major issue to attracting new players is that big pushes, like the Thargoid War, are off-limits to many players, and completely off-limits to new players who might want to jump in and who would be an obvious target for Frontier to entire into the game. The reason for that is the interminable, never-ending GRIND for materials and engineering to be able to build a decent ship suited to purpose.
    The solution, obviously, is to rebalance engineering, significantly reduce grind, and offer real money purchasing of BASE-LEVEL ships that allow someone to jump in to these major initiatives designed to attract new players.

    • @austinglueck2554
      @austinglueck2554 Місяць тому +2

      Yeah, I can imagine a less scummy version of what star citizen or Eve do working for Elite, have a cheap ship package that let's new players jump right into the gameplay that interests them.
      Hopefully it ends up more like that, and not something scummy.

    • @trevbuffi
      @trevbuffi Місяць тому +3

      A decent ship, suited to purpose in a realistic time frame. Shouldn't take a gamer years and years to enter a months long war. It's gross

    • @dynghivarn
      @dynghivarn Місяць тому +1

      I do not agree. The uniqueness of the game is the slow pace and that Elite actually means something, not just something one can buy a shortcut to. For shame, if the game turns to a pay-to-win.

    • @rhyssdeacon1845
      @rhyssdeacon1845 Місяць тому +7

      This is me I recently got back into elite but I’m an adult and work a full time job I wanna get involved in the thargoid conflict but I haven’t got time to grind for a fully kitted out ship. I can maybe play at most 3 hours a week. If I can just buy a ship so I can get some gameplay in I’ll do it.

    • @NFawc
      @NFawc Місяць тому +4

      The design choice to fence off Thargoid combat by requiring completely different weapons etc was just one poor choice in a list of many.

  • @Andrew-sl5fk
    @Andrew-sl5fk Місяць тому +10

    They should give Life Time Pass owners those ships for free (E-Class) or allow them to be purchased with CR.

    • @WiseOwl_1408
      @WiseOwl_1408 12 днів тому

      That's funny. Cows get milked

  • @Magmadon
    @Magmadon Місяць тому +62

    Holy crap. Is this it, Elite's second wind?
    Edit: nope, just monetization via the store. Rip

    • @stab74
      @stab74 Місяць тому +3

      Did you watch the entire video? There's also changes to engineering.

    • @tetiitet
      @tetiitet Місяць тому +2

      If it's really just prebuilt i'm ok with it, if we still can build it with ig money not arx. And also if the arx store balancing = lower the prices it's good then. But, yea i'm still in doubt with fdev since they're not that good with the community.

    • @Magmadon
      @Magmadon Місяць тому +2

      @@stab74 ye, very limited info on that. I get a little worried when they explain monetization in more detail than actual game content

    • @brianschwarm8267
      @brianschwarm8267 23 дні тому +1

      Imagine if they added VR motion controller support to Odyssey. I think a lot of VR players who were bummed that Odyssey would come right back, I know I would

    • @Freezorg-ze8nt
      @Freezorg-ze8nt 3 дні тому

      @@brianschwarm8267 That's WAYYYY past the work threshold I imagine Frontier putting into anything.

  • @michealsaunders8119
    @michealsaunders8119 Місяць тому +37

    Please less grinding, and more base / planetary / system development
    then we can travel out find our own place and build our own faction / economy

  • @swenic
    @swenic Місяць тому +27

    Pay to win, "as promised" then. I bet other variants will include ships that normally would require rank grind.

    • @ToCoSo
      @ToCoSo Місяць тому

      I hope they remove rank grind, it's probably the worst mechanic in Elite.

    • @milosmrdovic7233
      @milosmrdovic7233 Місяць тому +4

      I don't think it will be pay to win. So long as there are no exclusive payable upgrades that's can't be unlocked by playing the game, I'm all for it.

  • @dekkert5272
    @dekkert5272 Місяць тому +22

    Paying for early access is one thing, putting a ship behind a permanent paywall is quite another. As a fairly casual player, I don't feel any pressure to snatch an early access ship, but it's something I might do anyway because, as you eluded, it might benefit the long term health of the game...

    • @brianawilk285
      @brianawilk285 Місяць тому

      I wouldn't mind it if you can sell it back for real money. And you can name the price to sell it back based on what you did to it. It would give another way to earn real money.
      Putting it in the hands of the players would be a good idea.

    • @Beer_Dad1975
      @Beer_Dad1975 Місяць тому

      It's not like there isn't & always has been already at least 1 ship that's behind a permanent wall - fortunately the Cobra Mk IV is reportedly terrible though so I've never felt like I'm missing out on something.

    • @dekkert5272
      @dekkert5272 Місяць тому

      Selling ships for real money is a line I hope they never cross. I don't want to play that game. (Other valid opinions exist). As for the Cobra Mk IV, I think it's not terrible: it has its uses, but it certainly won't break the game. I hope they do release it more widely eventually: I've had a long enough day in the sun. Content.

  • @tgdelta2455
    @tgdelta2455 Місяць тому +21

    Honestly, im ok with this. It doesnt stop me earning it, and it allows players who don't have the time to do tedious buildings to just buy it.
    This puts more players in areas they need to be, and elite gets more funding

  • @jacksonms212
    @jacksonms212 Місяць тому +9

    I was thinking just the other day . Players that work a full time job collecting engineering mats is one of the bottle necks that stop us from trying new things / content in game. Thinking about this I had an idea that once a year we could use arks to fill up our engineering mats . That pretty much levels the field across the board no other actions needed . As far as early access for ships I'm not real keen on the idea of paying to test the ship so to speak . Mission unlocks I can get behind or even a CG for the unlock for top slots " I'll let you guys fight over the cut off numbers " . Bottom line Elite has to make some money or our game is in trouble . A fund raiser is not out of the question . Most of us started playing this game we were ... well less grey hair . Now we have wives , kids , bills and bank accounts. Times are tuff but I bet we could round up a few pennies for Elite . Before F'dev paints them self's in a corner they'll have trouble getting out of it would be wise to just ask the community . I think they would be supersized how fast we can rally for something we love .

    • @R0d_1984
      @R0d_1984 Місяць тому +1

      Just the travel time and finding mats drove me nuts when i started (it still does, i stopped playing because of it, i messed up an engineering build, chose the wrong one) , engineering the pre-built FSD...

  • @pitdoctor
    @pitdoctor Місяць тому +6

    Selling early access to ships is something that reminds me of a free to play game and feels extra gross on a game you actually paid for.
    I can fix the biggest hurdle to engineering in the game for them.
    Create a new in game vendor and let people use in game currency to buy all the engineering materials that are needed. Use that same vendor system to allow people that want to still go collect engineering materials to sell for in game credits.

  • @Huckleberry.69
    @Huckleberry.69 Місяць тому +14

    I have been playing the game on and off since release. After playing a game for that long waiting a few months extra to access a ship for free rather than paying real money isn't a problem for me.

    • @halofanatiks
      @halofanatiks Місяць тому

      Reasonable, i hope you enjoy it when it releases. I'm not sure what i'll do myself, it depends on how well a MK.II will fit my Seal builds.

  • @thagomizer8485
    @thagomizer8485 Місяць тому +6

    ED needs storylines, variety in starports, ground combat overhaul, new ships, overhauled PP gameplay, ship balance changes.
    What we're getting? Store facelift and P2W...

  • @daltonzart6581
    @daltonzart6581 Місяць тому +36

    This is a dangerous path. They will end up only making content behind paywalls.

    • @Youda00008
      @Youda00008 Місяць тому +3

      But is it more dangerous than completely abandoning any development on that game because it does not earn any money for the salaries?

    • @womp47
      @womp47 Місяць тому

      @@Youda00008 im honestly not sure which is better, the game slowly dying over time and losing players by the day, or the game still being developed but also drifting towards p2w

    • @pauloantoniolyons8171
      @pauloantoniolyons8171 Місяць тому

      I pay for the things that I want.........

    • @Gomorragh
      @Gomorragh Місяць тому

      already done it, 2 paywalls have happened, both dlc's have restricted you from partaking in certain parts of the game because you didnt buy the DLC, ive been saying since odyssey launch that there will end up being 1 more dlc that will make the game back into the game it was as Frontier elite 2 and Frontier First Encounter (3) and that will be atmospherics, too many games have done better ground gameplay while maintaining enjoyable ship upgrading and engineering without the grind, the fleet carrier was just a blatent copy of the NMS freighter, the only thing Elite Dangerous ever had going for it was that it was a scientifically accurate astrolabe of Sol in that year and date to our scientific knowledge on a 1 to 1 scale, with handwavium in place to shorten travel time.

    • @xDEADP00Lx
      @xDEADP00Lx Місяць тому

      Guys just come back to consolethen you don't have to worry about all that B's it's that simple. Oh what's this? You already got everything? Start the game over what else do you want me to say!?! Lol

  • @fasterspade4346
    @fasterspade4346 Місяць тому +5

    I would be kind of ok with it if they have plans to add major new features or possibly a sequel.

  • @theepicgamer5824
    @theepicgamer5824 Місяць тому +4

    So lemme get this straight
    New cmdrs can now get a fully fletched Mealstrom AX hunter ship for Arx and I had to actually learn the games mechanics farm the mats and spend hours on hours for months to gather all the credits and to engineer my ship.
    Thats BS

    • @kudosbudo
      @kudosbudo Місяць тому

      For you its bullshit. For new players its kind a great. I'd not wish that shite grind on anyone as its crap, not fun and walls off loads of gameplay. You should be happy they are finally trying to get it right for other folk.

  • @cmdrsoundo5240
    @cmdrsoundo5240 Місяць тому +8

    Engineering more predictable. Im hoping that is getting rid of topping those awful circles. Not knowing how many mats you will need. Go to engineer. I want 5a grade fsd that will be ''x" amount of mats. Ships for cash, potentially hazardous but I want the game to survive so really hope they have got this right. Great video. Thank you.

    • @kudosbudo
      @kudosbudo Місяць тому

      You don't need to top the circles, just get it so it unlocks the next stage and move on to that.

    • @TemalCageman
      @TemalCageman Місяць тому +1

      @@kudosbudo Well... I think that is what he is refering to... When you are on the last grade (G5) and want to maximise it sometimes you spend 10 rolls, sometimes you spend 5.

  • @RayHorn5128088056
    @RayHorn5128088056 Місяць тому +3

    Pay to win doesn't exist for solo players, like me.

  • @NoahChinnBooks
    @NoahChinnBooks Місяць тому +5

    Well, it won't affect how I play, but I don't know how this will affect the community at large. I hope the engineering changes are a positive change, though.

    • @R0d_1984
      @R0d_1984 Місяць тому

      When you're a new player (i only have about 500 hoursl Stopped playing because of it) just finding mats drives you nuts, not to mention the travel time and collecting, having to re-log 20-30 times is a sign that there isn't even enough mats at a location, and there's SO many different one's you need...

  • @Dabbler4
    @Dabbler4 Місяць тому +2

    Fdev: WE HAVE BIG PLANS FOR ELITES ANNIVERSARY
    Reality: PLEASE INSERT MORE COINS TO CONTINUE

  • @papajgates968
    @papajgates968 Місяць тому +4

    So it looks like we are going down the EVE route

  • @ShaighJosephson
    @ShaighJosephson 10 днів тому +1

    The only changes that would bring me back are custom ship building and base building... These BS changes are Frontier saying "what is the least amount of effort can we get away with putting into the game to amplify as major changes"... 💥

  • @emuhead
    @emuhead 23 дні тому +1

    Thanks for the update. Can i ask what was the music playing in the background? Really enjoyed it

  • @artolavonen1444
    @artolavonen1444 Місяць тому +4

    Well, my first thought of those "pre-built" ships: "Good luck with fighting interceptors like Medusa or Hydra". I mean even if you have the best ship ever, but you don't know how to fly with it against those murder flowers, it doesn't really help too much.

    • @57thorns
      @57thorns Місяць тому +5

      This is such an important part of Elite Dangerous. You need to spend many hours to get good at flying your ship. and in that time, you will likely come across the materials you need for engineering.

  • @asjam86
    @asjam86 Місяць тому +24

    Ive been playing elite since i was 11 now in my 40's. IRL does not provide me the time to go and grind for the necessary materials for AX combat. But my bank ballance would allow me to join in the killing of the maelstrom's and the community whereas my free time doesnt permit me to grind and enjoy what many commanders can. Providing its not play to win and instead play to join in, im in.

    • @ubermeg
      @ubermeg Місяць тому +1

      What you have described is exactly play to win. By paying real money you have "paid to skip" the necessary time and grind over someone who has been through the actual process in game to get the same necessary ship/modules to achieve exactly the same thing. You've therefore gained an unfair advantage of time and effort. How anyone can think this is not pay to win beggars belief.

    • @asjam86
      @asjam86 Місяць тому +1

      @@ubermeg Taking this through to it's conclusion. I'd argue many players are around my age range IE less of the younger generation and I'm sure many players find themselves in my position having less and less time.
      So we end up getting sick of not being able to join in the fun so we stop playing. I think we can all agree we need more players not less.
      What's being offered isn't over engineered A rated anything. It's just enough to allow entry to these events without being OP.

    • @Phantom_Kraken
      @Phantom_Kraken Місяць тому +3

      @@asjam86 I agree with your sentiment but I think the solution is making the game less Grindy instead because a player shouldn’t want to have to literally pay to play less of your game

    • @ST4RDUST
      @ST4RDUST Місяць тому +2

      Instead of making the game easier to grind, they are forcing you to pay again for the game you already paid for. The sole reason the grind was tolerated was because there wasn't any P2W monetization like this, now they have reasons to make the credit grind WORSE so that they force people to keep paying for new content, just like most mobile games these days.

    • @Gomorragh
      @Gomorragh Місяць тому +1

      the problem is that people warned fdev about how the whole grinding for stupid materials was driving the playerbase away, they ignored it, then the playerbase dropped so much they doubled it and some came back, then they dropped oddyssey with even more grinding but left it at the original rates envisioned in the first materials mess, the next step will be pay £3 a week to upkeep your carrier, then introduce your own station ingame permanently for £100, then keep the station modules running at £3 per week,

  • @bbbenj
    @bbbenj Місяць тому

    Thanks for your sum up.

  • @CmdrCathmore
    @CmdrCathmore Місяць тому +24

    I don't like paying real money for ships, but I don't hate it either.
    More than likely, this will take the form of an A Rated Asp Exp with maybe some engineered components like an FSD. Or same with a Vulture with a Power plant and engines.
    Having tried multiple times to get friends into this game, I'd have to say the biggest hurdles are understanding modules, ships, travel, and just the information overload involved early on.
    If they implement this right, it can be a great tease for what comes later as you invest time into the game and an easy way to show new players in a tangible way how this game can be really fun.
    This is Frontier Dev trying to reduce the grind we all complain about regularly and bring new blood into the game as well as cashflow.
    Let's not forget it's had 2 paid expansions in 10 years, which is a pretty small amount considering the worst offenders in the live service genre like destiny, with a $40 USD expansion annually.
    I don't like early access to the ship, but from a business perspective, they can't run a game this size on ship skins alone for this long. They do need a return on this game to support it and interest outside of the hardcore space sim community to keep it going. Otherwise, we may see the game enter "maitenece mode again.
    As much as we don't like it I feel like this was something that was bound to happen sooner or later given the success of Star Citizen in monitizing their ships. I doubt it with be nearly as bad as putting a mortgage payment down to get a midrange ship.
    More likely, $15-25 usd to get a rated ship. It's not great, but looking long term, I do see this ad something that may benefit us long term.
    TLDR: Not happy, but if this helps bring new people and cash flow to Elite, that can show Frontier and investors that this game is still active and has potential. Frontier will likely invest back more into the game we all love.

    • @GigachudBDE
      @GigachudBDE Місяць тому

      If ED got the kind of regular content Destiny gets I’d probably drop down that kinda cash annually too.

    • @Ocker3
      @Ocker3 Місяць тому

      ED did really well for years on their previous business model, but the online MMO landscape has changed, and FDev has to change as well. Gotta fund more programmers to put out new content somehow!

    • @CmdrCathmore
      @CmdrCathmore Місяць тому

      ​@Ocker3 Very true, it would be nice if they did more and regularly.

  • @cmdrHeliaxx
    @cmdrHeliaxx Місяць тому +14

    o7!
    The actual ships for Arx sure sounds bad, I gotta say.
    Im not sure I like where this is heading. Frontier has been super awesome with their pricing and how they monetise so far, and it would be a lot of shame seeing that go to waste.
    I hope not tho, I hate P2W in SC and I would hate even more should it be coming to Elite, it looks like a very bad precedens so far from what we've been used to from Frontier.
    The other news, sounds quite nice, looking foward to more details.

    • @stab74
      @stab74 Місяць тому

      If they do it like the premium tanks in World of Tanks i don't have a problem with it. Those aren't game breaking.

    • @cmdrHeliaxx
      @cmdrHeliaxx Місяць тому +2

      @@stab74 tbh World of Tanks' monetisation IS actually pretty bad and pushy, same with War Thunder. Not a very good example imo, and if it should go that way that's def not calming me down, quite the opposite.

    • @stab74
      @stab74 Місяць тому

      @@cmdrHeliaxx Well I don't know how it is now but when I was really into WoT ten years ago or so it wasn't bad. I'm just talking about the premium tanks idea, not all the premium ammo and other stuff they added.

    • @cmdrHeliaxx
      @cmdrHeliaxx Місяць тому

      @SpectralDolphin I don't know why you all keep ingoring that SC is even worse than just Simple P2W, it's literally pay to be able to even keep the ship. You don't even get to have such Basic thing unless you pay. If anything along those lines is what should be coming to Elite I don't want it (obviously it would be hard to get THIS predatory, but it's still making a bad precedens)

  • @kingblackphox7397
    @kingblackphox7397 Місяць тому +1

    I think this is to help with future updates and im curous to see what is going on though their heads

  • @rt-irish2430
    @rt-irish2430 Місяць тому +3

    It sits fine with me, they need to monetize more from the core portfolio, so if it means more updates, improvements etc and some monetization helps, well that's a worthy sacrifice. BUT, if they purposely make grinds harder or implement mechanics that are designed to 'encourage' people to spend, that would be wrong 100%

  • @freekeess9245
    @freekeess9245 Місяць тому +3

    As long as the prebuilt ships don't exceed anything you can get with time in game, i'm all cool with this. And having an easier to navigate arxs store would be a good thing.

  • @sammasic5849
    @sammasic5849 Місяць тому +2

    now if they can only add ship interior for ARX purchase! That would be great. That way it would eliminate people that don't want them and the ones that want them.

  • @moonshadegaming1778
    @moonshadegaming1778 Місяць тому +4

    The early access makes me think of MechWarrior Online, a free-to-play multiplayer game.
    They release mech packs that you can buy for real money, or if you wait a few months, you can buy them with the in-game currency. Some of the variants are only available for the game's version of gold, but there are plenty of events where you can earn thousands, so you can buy those variants without the need to open your wallet.
    All that said, the concerns of players is valid. Frontier haven't exactly held a stellar track record as of late, and this is, as you noted, a very slippery slope should the scuff up any steps here. I'm not going to jump to the doomsaying like others, but I am going to look forward with a healthy dose of trepidation while hoping for the best.

    • @user-mg8fn1bq9d
      @user-mg8fn1bq9d Місяць тому +1

      Hah...I'm an MWO founder and got into Elite via my unitmates.

  • @davidberg8770
    @davidberg8770 Місяць тому +8

    That Nice, if my favorite game is more accessible and popular that mean that my favorite game will get better and better. Good news

  • @TheDarknessOfNun
    @TheDarknessOfNun Місяць тому +11

    Fdev suddenly wake up and realised they nearly fdeve'd up and lost everything. Magically now there's loads of things they are sorting out. Surprising now that they desperately need the player bases money after years of providing nothing but disappointment and bugs

    • @SirCameron
      @SirCameron Місяць тому

      They realized they needed money so they started to try

  • @slundal
    @slundal Місяць тому +2

    I totally agree with the sentiment that Elite dangerous need to earn money to continue. Star Trek Online has handled this very well IMO and because of that it is still around many, many years after its release. Reducing the barrier to entry and helping players who don't have time to grind to still enjoy the end game content doesn't remove or take away anything from the players who have already made it there. The important part is to make sure that you don't remove something from the game that is already there and put it behind a pay wall. It is also very important that players can't purchases their way to an unfair advantage that players who doesn't buy arx can't get any other way.

  • @urbanNegritude38
    @urbanNegritude38 Місяць тому +2

    I gave up on this game ever since they stopped updating it on the consoles. Former elite dangerous PS player here. I was so annoyed.

  • @blogtwot
    @blogtwot Місяць тому

    I'll be there for the livestream, with my popcorn enjoying the live chat :)

  • @slamdunk6161
    @slamdunk6161 Місяць тому +9

    I dont see this as pay to win, it's more pay to avoid the hassle, and works perfectly for people who dont have lots of game time

    • @mobiuscoreindustries
      @mobiuscoreindustries Місяць тому

      I would agree with that statement if the hassle itself wasn't "weeks of your time for a single element in the absolute best of case supported by game exploits".
      Warframe is "pay to skip the hassle" but even It will grant you meaningfull, visible progress to whatever you seek in an hour or two, and it is entirely possible to do absolutely everything other than comunity created cosmetics completly free of charge on top of a meaningfull ability for players to trade and exchange their hard earned gameplay related elements, and even gift it to new players to speed up their progression
      Meanwhile Fdev's approach to hassle skip is basically making the hassle a wall to climb that would take more time to get through than the entire lifecycle of whole games, and then dangling the only solution in front of you. And depending on the price, this may be asking a whole lot of money to clear that hassle.
      Even star citizen of all games enables faster way to the single largest of vessels, from the bottom of the ladder, for way less time and effort. And hell you actually can trade and pool resources in this game in a way that frontier is determined to dissalow.

  • @StealthBoyElite
    @StealthBoyElite Місяць тому +1

    Thanks for the informative video. I personally think any steps toward cutting the Engineering grind down is a positive and these changes may even get me to get back into playing some more soon (though more on foot content would be a guarantee of that!). About p2w, so long as the purchased products are entirely obtainable without ARX then I don't see any issue.

  • @tarlcabbot2551
    @tarlcabbot2551 Місяць тому +23

    VERY concerned!! I am worried that this is the beginning of a VERY slippery slope. We can only hope I'm wrong.

    • @AgentExeider
      @AgentExeider Місяць тому +4

      Slope? more like tossed off a cliff.

    • @Joseph-wh5of
      @Joseph-wh5of Місяць тому +2

      Honestly and bring it on. Look af how much money star citizen has made? Can you imagine what frontier could do with that with elite.

    • @pigalex
      @pigalex Місяць тому

      @@Joseph-wh5ofyeah that’s my biggest thing. why i don’t like this new direction, i acknowledge that frontier has to either make money or discontinue the game

  • @happymoonmonkey
    @happymoonmonkey Місяць тому +7

    Changes enhance the ability for new players to access content that they want. That can only be a good thing to draw new players into the community.

    • @syzuna_
      @syzuna_ Місяць тому +1

      selling them ships won't help them with the Thargoid war e.g. tho.
      I kinda like that you have to go through some hoops, learn the game, learn to fly, learn some tricks before you go into sth endgame like Thargoids.
      All i see is another massive run against a wall over and over for new players until they quit bcs having the ship does not mean having the skills and understanding to pull it off

  • @rodolfoccorrea
    @rodolfoccorrea Місяць тому +2

    They need money, and there is nothing wrong with it, the game/product must be profitable for the company to keep its development. Pay for a grade A ship won't make any sense, but for a fully engineered ship it will make an enormous difference, although it will kill the fun to fine tune the ships and discover new builds possibilities by ourselves. Pay for new ships is a bad choice but pay for a full new quality season would make more sense. FDEV is trying what they can to keep the game alive, let's wait and see, and support as we can.

  • @Majima_Nowhere
    @Majima_Nowhere Місяць тому +2

    I don't really have a problem with this as long as the cash ships aren't better or equal to something you build in game. It's not like credits are particularly hard to come by, and engineering to g3 is also pretty trivial. Nobody's going to be using these ships for PvP unless they're strictly better than a dedicated PvP ship, and every other use case affects no one but the player.
    I'm more interested in the engineering changes. From the wording, I'm wondering if it's going to simplify it down to paying a flat rate of mats for each grade, kinda like how buying a tech broker module is now.

    • @ToCoSo
      @ToCoSo Місяць тому

      If they made them grade 4 engineered then it would still incentivize engineering especially if they make it easier to get materials.

  • @commandermyke7701
    @commandermyke7701 Місяць тому +2

    Uh oh. Set phasers to ‘borked’ 😣

  • @CmdrDjBurp-dr5uy
    @CmdrDjBurp-dr5uy Місяць тому +22

    I say we all embrace these changes and start encouraging other's to play. I've gamed for 45yrs and this change to a beloved game, will produce longevity.
    If you do not believe me, buy a console, every single game absolutely milks you for in game micro transactions.
    This approach by FDev is how to implement consumer costs to help develop the game further.
    I'm all for it. It was always coming, this way is more considerate than other companies.
    o7 cmdr's 😎👊

    • @parawill7074
      @parawill7074 Місяць тому +2

      Yeah, the game has been out long enough and the OPTION for players to buy cosmetics from the store is perfectly fine. We are customers and they are a business. They have spent significantly more money to keep the game going compared to each buyer of the game, so the criticisms over the practice isn't practical or helpful. We all have the freedom to either buy or not.

    • @vicviper319
      @vicviper319 Місяць тому

      @@parawill7074 "They have spent significantly more money to keep the game going compared to each buyer of the game" Correct me if I misunderstand, are you saying they've lost money on Elite? As there last few financials, Elite was one of the only profitable games they had compared to their other ventures. They made a nice profit over the last 10 years, but the company over all has lost money on their other ventures, and now they return to Elite to try to get more money out of it to save their financials

    • @CmdrDjBurp-dr5uy
      @CmdrDjBurp-dr5uy Місяць тому +1

      @@parawill7074 well said cmdr o7

  • @Sourcecode01
    @Sourcecode01 День тому

    Would like to know what this music is please, I see in description it just says "Epidemic Sound"

  • @stab74
    @stab74 Місяць тому +2

    If they make the paid for ships like premium tanks in World of Tanks or Armored Warfare than I don't have a problem with it. Those tanks aren't pay to win and come with pros and cons. Pro is you can just buy it, and earn in game credits at an accelerated rate. Con is you cant modify them, at all, and you can't get top of the line equipment for them like you can for the same model you can grind out yourself. If they do something like this in ED, should be fine.

  • @kamirupl
    @kamirupl Місяць тому +1

    I think/hope that these pre-built ships will have ''entry builds'' allowing to get in to activities they are meant for, and will have to be upgraded in-game to be actually good.

  • @kreankorm
    @kreankorm Місяць тому +1

    As someone who plays predominantly in Solo, paying for early access or pre-built ships with A-rated modules is a non-factor for me as it won't affect how I play or have access to. For people who play on Open, it is an different story, but my chief worry is that due to ED's learning curve, putting a new player in the pilot seat of a more expensive ship instead of an expendable Sidewinder might set the wrong example. Part of the joy of ED for me is earning and learning the new ship and upgrading it, understanding why the upgrades matter, and by skipping that process, the whales that can afford to do so reach the end of rewards with none of the journey and will end up getting frustrated or bored, which defeats the purpose of courting the whales to begin with.
    And for those of you who would complain that giving a new player access to end-game ships like the Anaconda, Corvette, Cutter, or Type 10 means that there will be an upset in power in PvP, let me remind you that even big and expensive ships can get spanked by smaller and cheaper ships if the there's a difference in pilot skill level. Giving experienced players access to pre-built ships won't change anything either because they already know the game, this just expedites the process of acquiring an upgraded ship.
    I am actually excited for ship engineering to become more streamlined.

  • @ZuluRomeo
    @ZuluRomeo Місяць тому

    Looking into it

  • @thebobbicus
    @thebobbicus Місяць тому +3

    I can't see people being able to buy ship builds with real money as a bad thing, as long as you can't buy better than can be acquired with in-game currency (ie no pay-to-win). Not so sure about buying early access to new ships like the Python II thoigh, I guess we'll have to wait and see what is discussed at the next livestream.
    Engineering has always been a hurdle, and I'd love to see it rebalanced in a way that makes it more accessible but without making it trivial, maybe requiring a mini-game to be played to "assemble" the engineered modules or time-trial type runs to gather materials instead of a grind. Im thinking here of something like very time-limited missions given to you that you have to go somewhere, load up the ship and return with a full hold of materials for the mission provoder, in return for which you can choose as a mission reward to keep a chunk of the materials you just transported (as an example)
    As long as there is no inherent advantage given to those who pay over those who just play, I see no issue

    • @TemalCageman
      @TemalCageman Місяць тому

      My cynical mind is "Hey guys... please beta-test this ship for us so we can get all things right until it become part of the game..." :)

  • @RiminiVirage
    @RiminiVirage Місяць тому +1

    Excellent information,thankyou. I will happily pay a reasonable sum for pre-built or early access depending on cost. I have been playing for 8 years and aside for some engineering tweaks have most of what I want in terms of ships and engineered modules, so in the main, the real grind to Elite ranks is over likewise to Federation and Empire rank. Let’s see what’s on offer before we bemoan pay to win or other similar sentiments. Let’s see what’s out there! 07 all. Great goings on at the Buur Pit. All hail Cmdr Buur.

    • @R0d_1984
      @R0d_1984 Місяць тому

      I'd pay for a centered seat in several ships, i HATE being offset in say the FDL/python etc, it drives me nuts...

  • @danielguyton8976
    @danielguyton8976 Місяць тому +12

    Hahaha! E:D trying to be Star Citizen without ship interiors. 10/10.

  • @someoneelse4492
    @someoneelse4492 Місяць тому +1

    In the scope of elite dangerous, these are significant changes. In the greater world of computer games, they're minuscule and not going to attract any players. There's a small amount of players who will return, but the Elite Odyssey restrictions are mind numbingly idiotic and will drive most of those players away. 3 years from the massive fail of Elite Odyssey and Fdev STILL has a death grip on it's mistake and driving forward from that failed direction.
    Cmdr Burr, you're not the only one who's going to die on that hill. The whole of Elite Dangerous is going to be there with you. I just hope that they open source it before they close down the company.
    Cheers.

  • @fredh8733
    @fredh8733 Місяць тому +1

    i dont mind the idea of paying for early access ships, maybe it will encourage them to create MORE ships!!! im glad they are talking about updating the ARX store... hopefully they will reduce the grind for materials ( i spent hours last night filling up on just military supercapacitors). engineering ships is one of my favorite things about this game.

  • @STNeish
    @STNeish Місяць тому +1

    I've more or less left Elite for Star Citizen. It makes me sad that this is so, because I played Elite as far back as 1984! Really, they could lure me back with just one thing: SHIP INTERIORS. We were promised this before the game even launched, and here we are YEARS later with no interiors.
    None of their other announcements are of any real interest to me.

  • @vcc_pdr
    @vcc_pdr Місяць тому +1

    Honestly, I would rather prefer a monthly subscription model that would fund new content. Think about it: we keep getting new content for free, one-time payment of MMO game; no other game does it. So keep the base game but with no updates (except for bugs), and create new branch that would cost $10/month. I would be more than willing to pay for it, and I am from really shitty country.

  • @cmdrgarud
    @cmdrgarud Місяць тому +1

    I will be there tomorrow, but I dont know about the future...

  • @anonemus2971
    @anonemus2971 Місяць тому +5

    I like the new ships being available. Some of us don't have the time available in our real lives that allows for the hours upon hours of material gathering that engineering a ship costs. The grind is more akin to a second job than anything else and honestly not even remotely fun.

  • @endeyfire
    @endeyfire Місяць тому +1

    my issue with ED will always be the lack of a proper hualer/trucker ship series.
    best you get is a type 9, dead center of the progression line, with nothing better except maybe the last ship imperial cutter or whatever its called.
    i want to spend 10m buying a 1-2k of something, and make 14-20m at the destination.
    best i hear we get is just a fat type 9 and a fleet carrier.

    • @TemalCageman
      @TemalCageman Місяць тому +1

      Yeah... I really want to see the Panther Clipper in the game... but I think it is too big to fit through the toastracks.

    • @endeyfire
      @endeyfire Місяць тому

      @@TemalCageman we need bigger bricks.

  • @xpaxhenko
    @xpaxhenko Місяць тому

    One of my favorite moments of ghe game is when j was first able to buy an adder so i can go mining in it. At that point i had zero idea how to do it, let alone mine in a t6

  • @cwolfxuk-other
    @cwolfxuk-other Місяць тому +2

    Great vid.
    Can buy a big powerful ship, yes. Have the skills to use it, less likely. I don't mind, it is a galaxy simulator - in reality there are rich boys and girls driving parent money cars. This is fine. As long as nothing non cosmetic is paywalled I am happy.

    • @user-mg8fn1bq9d
      @user-mg8fn1bq9d Місяць тому +1

      Exactly...if you invested 100s of hours flying FA off and are great at dogfighting, I doubt some guy in a newly purchased with real money Anaconda or whatever is going to be a problem.
      It's like racing some trust fund kid with a new Porsche and no experience out on a race track as a seasoned vet.

  • @honoredshadow1975
    @honoredshadow1975 Місяць тому +1

    Has the game's anti-aliasing improved? When I played it years ago at 4k resolution, it didn't look great. Are there any updates on DLSS or DLAA support? Thank you!

    • @Mittzys
      @Mittzys Місяць тому +2

      FSR. TAA also exists, as well as MSAA

  • @GatisKaulinsh
    @GatisKaulinsh Місяць тому

    Sorry for the unrelated question. Those bases with access point scanning on SRV long long time ago now are visitable on foot or they gone? About other changes you mentioned I don't care. The only thing I always wanted from Elite is something amazing or new for explorers out in deep space to discover or to do and I guess this is still in bad shape?

  • @grooverkitty
    @grooverkitty Місяць тому

    I appreciate the frank and clear update! Thank you ☺️
    Frontier gotta make money. Their share price is low. I don’t think it’s gonna be a slippery slope. I love the idea of being able to get a prebuilt A-rated ship for a few bucks or some (to be fair many) hours of participation.
    🎉 I think it’s good news ❤

  • @JOHANN8242
    @JOHANN8242 Місяць тому +1

    I don't care about people being able to buy premade ships, not everyone can sink hours on farming money to fully upgrade a ship.
    I just hope that they either change the engineering requirements from materials to money or that they add a material vendor.

  • @cmdrhumbo9067
    @cmdrhumbo9067 Місяць тому +45

    I'm always puzzled how anyone "wins" Elite Dangerous. My main concern is that Elite continues as my favorite space game, everyone seems fine with Star Citizen selling ships but if Elite does it then its an instant toys out of pram throwing contest. I don't particularly like the idea of FD selling ships but for some players with less time it may make the game much more attractive. What I am sure is that there will be indignant outrage and that FD will back peddle at some stage.

    • @cmdrHeliaxx
      @cmdrHeliaxx Місяць тому +17

      I am not fine with what SC does, and its one of the reasons why I dont play it. I would have hoped FDEV are gonna hold themselves to much higher standard than CIG who have shown over the years just how unhinged they are with the P2W and monetisation. Especially as they have so far.

    • @Uselessnoobcow
      @Uselessnoobcow Місяць тому +5

      The outrage is and will be justified.
      Every game with pay to unlock or pay to win mechanics spirals down a path of extreme grind to push more people towards the pay route. This is atrocious and the fact anyone thought this was a good idea is a huge indicator of the average intelligence of the senior management at FDEV, granted, we already suspected it wasn’t particularly high…

    • @cmdrhumbo9067
      @cmdrhumbo9067 Місяць тому

      @@Uselessnoobcow Pay to unlock I can see, but how do you "win" elite?

    • @cmdrhumbo9067
      @cmdrhumbo9067 Місяць тому +1

      @@cmdrHeliaxx ok then "some people are fine with Star Citizen selling ships" :)

    • @Uselessnoobcow
      @Uselessnoobcow Місяць тому +3

      @@cmdrhumbo9067 pay to win is a phrase - it doesn’t have to mean literally win.
      The fact it encourages fdev to build in grind to encourage sales is the whole point

  • @balazshajdu4612
    @balazshajdu4612 Місяць тому

    Thank you for summarizing the news as always around ELITE ! I fully agree with you on recent developments and news, I am excited for the same reasons as I am a bit concerned for others, but as always I am optimistic, Also I am actually considering paying ARX for the new Python as it may give great implementation to my RP character in the game :D ( certainly not gonna use it as pay to win mechanic) and I hope FDEV is -as you say - aware of the dangers of this road.
    Looking forward to getting more info, Godspeed until then Cmdr Buur!

  • @HalfRobot42
    @HalfRobot42 Місяць тому +1

    I'll be very interested to see just how good the ship builds they sell are, i wonder how aware of the meta frontier is

    • @syzuna_
      @syzuna_ Місяць тому +1

      their example of a Titan Chieftain should tell you everything you need to know about how aware they are xD

  • @paulsweet322
    @paulsweet322 Місяць тому +1

    I personally think this might be what is needed to keep the game alive and potentialy bring back players and also bring in new players. Depending on the type of ships you can buy and their role it might negate the pay to win gamers. If a combat ship is released perhaps it's geared towards PVE and not PVP, so no clear advantage over other players. I'm looking forward to it. I've been playing since Alpha, lifetime backer and can't wait to buy the new Python on May the 7th. Under a tenner for a new ship, why wouldn't I? It's not Star Citizen and I'm having to remortgage my house for a ship. Looking forward to it all.

  • @gulredy
    @gulredy Місяць тому

    I would be really happy to buy pre-engineered ships for in-game currency. I would really like to try out thargoid fights but never had the chance to have the amount of time to put together a ship with which I would be able to stand againts a thargoid cyclops etc.

  • @GaryGraham66
    @GaryGraham66 Місяць тому +2

    I've been out in the black for nearly two years. Twelve ships on my fleet carrier, mining and exploring. Nothing in any update has really affected me apart from recent delays in fleet carrier jumps (not sure what's going on there since I was banned from the forums and haven't bothered looking). Still lots of things that should be implemented, my main one would be remote refuelling of fleet carrier if it has fuel on board rather than having to fly back to the carrier, manually change ship (type 10 all cargo) fill up with tritium and "donate it" to the carrier, then change back to a different ship and fly off to explore.
    Hardly realistic IMHO.

    • @TemalCageman
      @TemalCageman Місяць тому

      Fleet Carriers crash the servers if too many jumps at the same time... and there are thousands of them jumping around regarding the Thargoid war... so... Fdev implemented timers so that the servers do NOT crash when thousands of people want to move their fleet carrier due to an update. And this is something that can linger for a couple of weeks before it settles down. Since Fleet Carriers are cross platform and are essentially moving Starports, they tax the servers a lot compared to regular player ships.

    • @GaryGraham66
      @GaryGraham66 Місяць тому

      ​@@TemalCageman Ah cheers for that, I wondered why my carrier was still where it was after 55 mins.

  • @brianhanna3128
    @brianhanna3128 Місяць тому +1

    Hey folks, thanks for the prompt update! Personally speaking, everything sounds like the sort of refresh one would expect from a live service game run by a company in need of financial shoring-up (did you know they'd sold the rights for Planet Coaster 3 back to Atari?) - as long as it doesn't end up with a definitive "well that's just pay to win, there's no other rationale" then I'm good with it - Engineering can be quite the slog depending on how one plays (& I'm personally sick of watching precious, precious selenium being wasted in fractional upgrades) and the rest of it sounds very much like new-player-onboarding/QOL amendments, all apart of course from paid early access. I don't even mind that the ships are locked to Odyssey since moving to 4.0 was such a big deal & very deliberately drew a line between two versions. Paid early access for three months is more than enough time to establish new ship metas and certainly to have a marked impact on the BGS & Powerplay. I'm in two minds about it, to be honest - the Python Mk2 becomes Arx-available on a certain someone's birthday which will make it rather difficult to resist! An interesting grab-bag of an FDev missive to be sure.

  • @Mazder_Verhal
    @Mazder_Verhal Місяць тому +2

    Focussing on the ship build rather than materials needed.
    Ooooh baby please, please, pleeeease let that mean I can buy what I need with credits at the engineering facility. Even at a mark-up in exchange for not having materials I'd take that!
    Arx pricing I think are going up TBH.
    3 months early access to the new ships is fine, let those who are willing to pay test it out, lol.
    Paying for prebuilt ships that are "better" with real-world money is just a pay to win/pay to skip system. If it's emphasis is purely on skipping over gameplay then they are all but admitting that there are certain sections of their game that are either worth skipping, or that they do not think they can effectively balance them. Be it either due to the code being too difficult without rebuilding from scratch (which I don't blame them, I wouldn't want to rebuild my game's code this long after release, lol), or from it taking too much dev time away from current content.
    In principle it's sound, but it's not something I'd recommend it being done for real-world cash. I'd much prefer it being done with in-game currency only, as even with my wants for being able to just hop to a new "career" it kind of makes my time building up/being successful in my previous one kind of null and void.
    I don't envision the prebuilt ships will be able to affect the "end-game level" stuff as that WOULD be pay to win.
    Without more info I am tentatively excited for engineering changes, especially around making materials less necessary.

  • @Mittzys
    @Mittzys Місяць тому +5

    Absolutely terrible changes regarding monetisation. I have loved this game for ten years and seeing a terrible company do such things to it saddens me

    • @kudosbudo
      @kudosbudo Місяць тому

      Its funny everyone thinks this is them showing tehy will continue to invest in the game. I think this is a quick cash grab to hopefully get whats leftfrom folks wallets before they shut the servers down. SO many lives services dying. Hope i'm wrong but throwing stuff out like this just feels off.

  • @powderedaura2656
    @powderedaura2656 Місяць тому

    I'm glad they are trying to make more of an effort to make money! Means more content in the future.

  • @coricelesti959
    @coricelesti959 Місяць тому +1

    I can't say I've ever approved of selling game content (as opposed to cosmetics) for real money in any game (well, any game where the game itself and any expansions are paid for). This feels like a bad decision to me.

  • @dennisanderson3286
    @dennisanderson3286 Місяць тому

    👍 given
    And greetings from Hawaii. Thank you for the solid information. And flying through the asteroid fields and the planet back drop. That's some good stuff 🪐

  • @KasparasPra
    @KasparasPra Місяць тому +1

    Honestly Fdev lost a touch to ED..
    no vision.. no continuity.. no thought..
    doing something chaotic, jumping from 1 unresolved item to another and making them worse :/
    so sad

  • @generaalsubutai6541
    @generaalsubutai6541 Місяць тому

    Makes sense though. We have had the whole Thargoid war beautifully created by FDEV and most players don't have the ships to play it.
    Getting there from scratch via the Guardian weapons and the AX materials well. It takes a lot of time. Longer than the war itself!

  • @thespectator1243
    @thespectator1243 Місяць тому +1

    I do not mind Frontier looking for more ways to make money.
    They can't run just on sales of the game alone, since the game is not very accessible for new players (I know of about 5 friends or colleagues that have started the game, but lost interest VERY quickly).
    The game just is not very good at leading the players to where the action is (or rather the ongoing narrative).
    I understand M.r Braben said they do not want to hold the hands of the players.
    But in a Galaxy THIS big, you at least need someone POINT you to where to action is.
    And the game itself does not do that.
    Which is EXACTLY why all of said 5 potential players lost interest.
    That being said:
    I wish Frontier would be more open to us.
    We understand they need money.
    But they appear to not understand what we might be interested to pay for.
    Like... furniture or decorations for the quarters on board of your ship, for instance.
    Yes, I know, no ship interior is planed, but I do not need my ship to be FULLY modeled.
    I do not need to walk into my cargo bay; I know you can not model all the interior if the players can switch each and every module.
    Which is a bit different to Star Citizen: as far as I can tell, there the ships are less modular, so you can get away with a more static (but certainly more elaborate) design.
    As for the pay2win:
    unless the ships have exclusive equipment, I do not mind.
    If I can get everything, including the paintjob and shipkit, in a different way (ARX in this case), I am fine.
    About the changes to engineering:
    Changes to the better or worse? ;)
    o7

  • @thekingofawesomeness9173
    @thekingofawesomeness9173 Місяць тому +1

    Personally I think the fact that fdev is trying at the moment has been a big game changer. Yes its probably not perfect and there's been some bugs both in and out of the game but it's more than has been for a while so I'm down to pay some money to support them and have fun with a new ship at the same time.( long as it's not pay to win)

  • @zeazevedo
    @zeazevedo Місяць тому +2

    I understand that they need to better monetize the game, and I'm even happy about that. If the game is more profitable, they will have more incentive to continue releasing new content.
    On the other hand, I hope that whatever you can buy in the store, you can also get in the game.
    If it's just a question of how fast you can get things, I think it's a smart move on FDev's part.
    But the line between good and bad in this issue is very thin, I hope this isn't the beginning of the P2W era in the game.
    I'll wait and see before jumping to conclusions.

  • @willwannabe
    @willwannabe Місяць тому +1

    I have been playing this game for just under 5 weeks and I managed to unlock all the engineers in or near the bubble and have engineered a few ships fully so far. Now I feel like I have the worst timing ever..... FML

  • @hcsvoicepacks
    @hcsvoicepacks Місяць тому

    Welcome changes - Sone that will bring in a new generation of players in droves - Refreshing and much needed for our community.

  • @CaptWinky
    @CaptWinky Місяць тому

    So, they’ve noticed how well Star Citizen is doing and want a piece of the pie… The thing is SC still has a big advantage as the ships “feel” more real with things like interiors. Without that, they’ll never sell.

  • @adamdiebold6412
    @adamdiebold6412 Місяць тому +7

    Sounds like they need money. I have said for years that I would love to buy my own star system, and Id pay real world money for it.

    • @onduty6024
      @onduty6024 Місяць тому

      This would be awesome! One per account... people with money could buy additional accounts and additional systems. Restrict purchase of systems to only systems where the player has been the first to fully discover and explore. There would be a mad rush to colonize the whole of the milky way (though that would never happen due to the sheer size). Allow additional IRL purchases to add a limited number starbases and planetary bases per system (e.g., 1 large and 2 small per system, and 1 planetary per landable planet.) I think they could start making star citizen-level money if they put their heads together. The beauty of selling systems and construction of new bases is that it wouldn't provide any real benefit that isn't shared with all players; it would just be a personal pride/satisfaction thing. You could even integrate the new powerplay system into these purchase-able systems/bases so the players would then have a real motivation to 'defend' their systems from being overrun by an administration that they did not prefer, etc. Instead of just the main bubble and Colonia, we'd eventually have hundreds if not thousands of mini-bubbles... with missions you can pick up inside these new mini-bubbles. It would be a whole new game that people would want to play for the rest of their natural lives! ... and pass on the accounts to their great grandkids LOL

    • @Larry_Parada
      @Larry_Parada Місяць тому +1

      Honestly this idea would be great if you can have and name your own system and given either a starport or an outpost.

    • @Larry_Parada
      @Larry_Parada Місяць тому +1

      ​@@onduty6024 I've actually been working on my own "mini bubble" out in the black in hopes that this becomes a thing and I can turn it into a "rest stop"😂

    • @BorisHaeussler
      @BorisHaeussler Місяць тому +1

      @@onduty6024 This idea is great, it would give exploration a nice boost.
      (and ultimately will mean we will ALL live FAR from the bubble by this point. No idea how close my 'closest' explored system would be)

    • @onduty6024
      @onduty6024 Місяць тому

      @@BorisHaeussler 98% of my 1500+ hours in Elite have been solo... it would be a dream come true to have my own star system in the middle of the black.

  • @youyu521
    @youyu521 Місяць тому

    Ship prebuilds via the ARX store is probably welcome for returning players to hopped into Thargoids war especially

  • @issonkiporto
    @issonkiporto Місяць тому

    Oh. Sad. But i will always love your content at the buur pit.

  • @Slavic_Sky
    @Slavic_Sky Місяць тому +1

    I'm happy about more ships and variants, changes to grindeneering, that's a good news. Not care much about paid stuff, not paying for early access ships either.

  • @c0baltl1ghtn1ng
    @c0baltl1ghtn1ng Місяць тому +5

    The ARX for Early Access to the new ships I feel is fine, but the ARX for the Pre-built ships is kinda dumb.
    The only hurdle for 'just build it yourself' is Engineering, which they are making "more accessible and predictable."

    • @grooverkitty
      @grooverkitty Місяць тому

      Well yeah and like millions of credits to buy the class A stuff..

    • @wr0ngel
      @wr0ngel Місяць тому +3

      It is a newbie trap, but benefits all of us.
      Player A is a Vet and gets a G5 combat miner Cutter in say 2 weeks. Player B is a newbie who buys it with one click. What difference does that make? Same ship same capabilities, nobody lost anything, Vet enjoyed his time outfitting the ship, newbie happily dies to NPC pirates, Fdev got money to exist, everybody wins.
      The learning cliff is still there to make players do their own research.

  • @Thin447Line
    @Thin447Line Місяць тому +1

    That's a "No" for paying for early access. "Fixing" engineering so that if I do want to see what the new Python Mk-2 is all about, I can bypass some of that annoying grind just to get it up to spec so can get from here to there without it taking 30 jumps. I think once you've completed the tasks for an engineering upgrade, you should be able access those same upgrades for any ship. Initially establish the relationship with a particular engineer, then you have them as a perpetual resource for upgrades. More content like ship interiors, of course is what everybody has been screaming for and has fallen on deaf ears. I would like to see more station interiors. Besides the standard 3 or 4 locations at every station, how about more gameplay content? Search through the bowels of the inner workings for hidden easter eggs or search the residential section for someone with key information, or sneak around other hangars to loot or sabotage other ships? The size of these stations is so huge, the potential for additional content is enormous. Yes, I know, developers, developers, developers. Just my wishful thinking. I was never turned on by the whole Thargoid narrative. This universe should be large enough for many other adventures and story lines besides the pre-determined narrative.

  • @pandafoz9994
    @pandafoz9994 Місяць тому +5

    Paying for ship packages doesnt sit right with me at all. Early access to ships i would understand if it hadnt been 6 years. I get that the game needs to make money but this just doesnt feel right

  • @CMDRExorcist
    @CMDRExorcist Місяць тому +5

    Second! o7 CMDRs. Let's go!!!

  • @fixitman2174
    @fixitman2174 Місяць тому +1

    Heck of a gamble... If they do this right, they'll get out of the hole they've been climbing out of a little faster. If they screw it up, they could fall all the way back to the bottom. I hope they've been filling it in behind them, just in case.