Causes of global pollution: 1. The transport industry (planes, ships) 2. wars 3. mining 4. All kinds of cheaply made stuff: People prefer to buy 5 cheap t-shirts instead of just a good one. Cheap clothes get trashed very quickly while expensive well made clothes can last for years. Cheap clothes tend to be made in unregulated factories that pollute a lot. People keep buying and throwing away soon after. An italian made 100€+ shirt can last for 8 years or so. 5. Sheeple consumist mentality: Im a right wing guy and Im all about capitalism but lets be honest the sheeple consumist mentality benefits the companies but harms the environment. People lease a cheaply made premium car for 3-4 years (most premium cars nowadays have internal parts made of plastic and other crap) instead of keeping their old car in perfect condition (which would be better for the environment), just cause they want to compete against their neighbours and have a flashier car than them. The only thing they are competing against is their own debt. In the past, people saved money and bought a car in cash and kept it for 15 years or so. 5. the sheeple mentality of buying a new Iphone every year when you could use the same Iphone for 5 years, etc... are the real causes of global pollution and not your average joe using his gas powered MOT approved hatchback to drive to work. Also lots of idiots buy very big SUVs that they dont really need just because they want others to think they are rich. Consumism and global pollution cant cohabitate together. If people really wanted to save the planet they would be repairing their old stuff. If people didn't base their self esteem on the material stuff they own and they kept their old stuff in great condition and they were more careful about the stuff they buy global pollution would decrease. On the other hand if people really cared about the environment they wouldn't consume so much and so much cheap stuff but this would have a negative impact on the economy. Its very hard to find a balance between reducing global pollution and not negatively impacting the economy. Also this ULEZ law is silly and is discriminating against the people that own old cars that have passed all the emission tests and run in perfect condition. - An average joe that drives to work in his old frugal MOT approved hatchback is NOT the main cause of global pollution, he shouldn't be punished with these unfair laws. I bet you that a dumbass that drives a brand new V8 "plug-in hybrid" Porsche Cayenne to take his 1 son to school never uses the electric motor on his 2500 kg SUV. And Im not against people buying cool toys, everyone is free to do whatever they want with their money, its just that these laws dont make any sense and punish the average joe and all the car repair businesses that would be working on these older cars. Sorry for my english, im drunk
Absolutely! Coming expansion of ULEZ in London is a great test on how far people can go for their freedom and how many of us. This expansion is clearly “an offer” but not “an order”. There is no even legal basis under it, never mind lawful. It is an offer to pay for “something” and threats for not agreeing on ”the offer”. This is clearly a daylight robbery in 21st century style. Mass rejection of ”the offer” and non-compliance would send a massive signal to THEM - We are the people are not the slaves; Keep your hands off us and our future. Would People be able to show who is the master, like people of Birmingham did? I very much hope so.
The answer is very simple, everyone ignore it. Throw away any letters, ignore any communication. If millions of people did this it could not be viable.
Or write across it that you do not consent or wish to contract with this unlawful scheme of extortion and they must cease and desist any further unlawful demands, keep a copy for your records and post the original back to them.
I have an old Ford Galaxy diesel ..... it runs perfectly, and always passes it's MOT with ease. I registered the car to my brother a few years ago when the ULEZ zones started. It's accrued thousands of ULEZ notifications and fines. I'm waiting for them to come and try to collect the fines. My brother died 6 years ago, so good luck with that. But this one registering it in Khan's name seems an even better idea
@@GeoffBuysCars Thank you. Obviously not something anyone would want to happen, but I know he would have approved 100% I was just going to register the car in a ficticious name, but saw the opportunity ...... but the idea is the same .....
@@rogerphelps9939Cash is king stand against card transactions anything digital is evil and wrong the government can control weather or not your family eats because they have control of your funds however physical cash you'll have to pry from my dead body
Not enough leverage from a minority group. Despite the incorrect propaganda, over 90% of vehicles driven in the Ulez are exempt. Of those that are not, only a small percentage fail to pay the fee and of those, only a tiny percent fail to pay the penalty charge. This means they are an easy target for the courts and bailifs.
If I lived in London I wouldn’t pay this TAX . I was a POLL TAX protester and didn’t pay ( even after bailiffs turned up ) and Maggie Thatcher was out in 6 months . Unite everyone 👍
I've lived in France for nearly twenty years and for your information every large city in France has a similar system, but nobody rioted ! Why ? Because the French are more intelligent than the English.
@@brianferguson7840 They aren't if they accepted this as it is not founded in any real science and no one has rioted in the UK so what are you on about?
They will just do like Australia if you don't pay your fines your licence goes under FINES SUSPENSION and you got no licence at all until the fine is payed and only then your LICENCE SUSPENSION is lifted, non payment of the fines won't change a thing they will make sure of it
And stop using his Rang Rover and lead buy example and ride a bike 🚲 like Boris did when he was mayor but then people liked Boris 😂 I don't think Khan we ould dare ride a 🚲 to work .
It's very funny, but looking for loopholes is acceptance of the rule. Protest this outside your MPs and Kahn's houses. If they make life uncomfortable for us then we make it worse for them.
In political philosophy, the phrase 'consent of the governed' refers to the idea that a government's legitimacy and moral right to use state power, is justified and lawful only when consented to by the people or society over which that political power is exercised. In a democracy, politicians take their orders from the majority, if they refuse to seek consent - they should be sacked. If they don't get sacked, legal action should be taken. If legal action is not possible - revolution is required to purge the corruption.
We get to vote for one of "their" dictator puppets owned and controlled by them, it's like choosing between a dog sh*t, cat sh*t and rat sh*t sandwich and then being told "well you chose it".
I don't know how else to get my message across. I am a ventilation engineer and my area is the whole of the South East of England. The worst polluted place on my patch is Kensington and Chelsea where they have supposedly been protected by the congestion charge since the early 2000s and the ULEZ from it's inception. Most places have new filters every 12 months but there it is every 6 months and the filters are black every time. In the outer boroughs like Bromley or Havering they are only grey after a year. The Zones have no effect on pollution whatsoever. I agree that pollution needs dealing with but they don't have any working solution yet. Also people in the Zone pay for it whether they drive or not. Maintenance people like me pass the charge on to customers all the time.
One of our cars is registered in my dad's name at his old address (I incorrectly said "my car" initially). He died over 20 years ago. As far as I'm concerned, if it's OK for them to use underhand tactics to extract more money from us then it's perfectly OK for us to use underhand tactics to protect ourselves. People, always remember that the roads do NOT belong to the government and councils to be used as a cash cow, they are PUBLIC roads. As for pollution, scientists proved many years ago that brake dust is one of the biggest problems for people with asthma - yet thanks to congestion, which is often caused by removing available roads to use as bus lanes etc - there is MORE brake dust in the air than ever before. So "traffic calming" schemes etc. are probably at least partly responsible for the increase in children with asthma. This is one of the reasons I don't believe the "clean air" bollox.
Not least that 'traffic calming' increases local emissions from braking, acceleration and noise...right outside front doors, school gates and hospital gates. World class bollocks!
I think you never heard the term induced demand my friend and is a bus lane really that bad? Honestly I enjoy them as then my bus can speed right through the traffic.
@@Mgameing123 Yes, bus lanes are great - if you're on a bus. But it's nothing to do with demand, it's about trying to force cars off the road. There are countless areas where there are bus lanes in operation 24/7 where buses only run once an hour, or once every 30 minutes or so up until a certain time, or not on Sundays etc. But that's not the point. The point is it's forcing other traffic off the roads, making drivers take a longer route and so on, NONE of which is helping the environment which is what the ULEZ thing is supposedly all about. Besides, buses are now just a private enterprise, in it for profit, why should they get any priority on roads that we all pay for? As I keep on reminding people, these are PUBLIC roads, not for certain people to use or for councils to do what they like with for financial benefit.
As said previously, if it was about pollution and the populations health he would just ban the vehicles and not fine the owners, he is such a weasel old Mayor Khan't! It took a bit of time but another UA-camr managed to make his 99 plate 1.7 Puma exempt by contacting the manufacturer and getting proof of its NOX value but he's owned it a very long time so it was worth it, i really hope we don't lose more retro/classics due to Mr Weasels money grabbing scrappage scheme!
How is outright banning these care better than having a fine to pay to use them? People with classic cars can still drive them as much as their budget allows, and it just feeds into the standard cost/benefit calculation we all do anyway (having a car of any type isn’t free from costs of course!) London is already incredibly navigable without a car, I really wish my city was more like that.
@@rainbowevil It just proves that its not about emissions and public health which is the excuse he uses for it, its just another money grab to help fund his mismanagement of TFL etc.
Keep sending them SAR for copies of all the videos and photos they have on you. Then send the order that the data be deleted. Also demand the names of the companies or people who have bought the data off them. You can then repeat the process with them.
@@diannawhyte9595 Sorry wrong thread. The Khan bit is people registering their vehicles with Khan as the register keeper. Then all fines are sent to him, and he has to identify the driver. Clearly he's not going to know who the driver is, so he takes the fine. Now if you do that, say and you are clearly black, white or chinese, or female, all you have to do is wear a Khan mask. Then when the look at the video, or your brief shows it to the court, with you sitting their saying nothing as is your right, the other side looks very stupid.
Another new loophole is just to reject the fine as it's based on anpr and anpr can't be used as evidence anymore due to 1.7 million cloned number plates in the UK, so it's not really a loophole but a legal remedy.
there was a ruling recently (soz I don't have the data) that fines via cameras are non valid...... I'm looking forward to claiming back £180 from Birmingham Council....
@@pauls3075 exactly! Now what the person who registered with him is make sure someone else is driving. For example he is on a flight at the time of the offence. The reason is khan will say the driver was the donor. But with proof he is in the air, khan has perverted the course of justice
Even if your current car is ULEZ compliant, they will forever raise the bar so that one day it won't be. Then there'll be the push for EVs only in London. I also still think it's hypocritical to allow people to pollute as long as they pay. WTF!
I might be wrong but I don’t think they will go for road charging just yet. If they go too fast it will cause a huge stir and they will have non payment trouble (until digital ID anyway). My bet is they tighten the ULEZ standards a few times first to condition the public into accepting being charged to drive on their own roads.
1.Scotland’s current position This research project draws together Scottish, UK and international examples and baseline evidence on the concept of ‘20 minute neighbourhoods’, and how it can be best translated in a Scottish context. The project identifies areas of good practice, and takes account of our geography, demography, economy, governance and relevant policy drivers to inform the translation of the concept. The Scottish Government defines a 20 minute neighbourhood as: ‘where people can meet their needs within a 20 minute walk from their house - enabling people to live better, healthier lives and supporting our net zero ambitions.’ 2 The project had two main aims: 1. To consider the ambition for 20 minute neighbourhoods in Scotland, taking account of the differing settlement patterns across the country, and to highlight interventions that would support delivery of the concept, supported by findings from a baseline analysis 2. To analyse international evidence of the success of interventions to achieve these ambitions, including identifying specific success factors, place-making impacts, barriers to success, regulatory frameworks, funding mechanisms and stakeholder engagement and buy-in. The Scottish policy context is defined in section 1.1, while the details of the definition of a 20 minute neighbourhood and the desired outcomes are explained in section 1.2. The baseline methodology and results are set out in sections 1.3 and 1.4. Section 2 presents the evidence from UK and international case studies. Feedback from a range of stakeholders informed the subsequent suggested ambitions and recommendations for implementation, see organisations listed in Appendix C. ...... !!!
That's why they were desperate to keep the recent global "health emergancy" going as long as possible because they needed more time to phase in their social credit system (health passport). Also note suddenly it's a "climate crisis" this phrase has replaced the previous "health crisis". Before 2020 it was never called "climate crisis" but since the first "crisis" Didn't last long enough they've had to make another one to justify totalitarianism.
In Aberdeen there's not a fee, but a fine of £60 or £30 if paid within 14 days for non compliant vehicles, this comes into place in June, how can a council extort money like this?
Sadiq Khan *won’t* be able to go around to the owner of that car’s house, because thanks to the Data Protection Act, he won’t be able to see the previous keeper’s address on his new logbook! 😆
5:03 and dont forget mould in our homes ESPECIALLY now that many cannot afford to heat their homes properly during winter. Currently investigqting this further and going to approach some media outlets that might run with it. I asked TfL for data to back up the ULEZ... was met with radio silence.
As far as I'm concerned if I have paid vehicle tax/road tax I've paid to use His majesty's roads. If a town or an area of a town is going to implement road charging to collect money from visitors or people passing thru their areas then when people from that or those areas leave their areas they must pay to leave them. How would all the schemes affect the travel industry. In particular areas such as Cornwall and Wales who rely quite a bit on tourism? Not been clearly thought thru like the 15 minute prisons, oops sorry, cities has it?
Unfortunately I think it has been very well planned. ULEZ and 15 minute cities are one and the same thing. Clean air zone cameras essentially geofence an entire area, the standards can then tighten until the public is priced out of private transport. There’s your 15 minute city.
@@chevchelios8582 Then what happens to the car/motorcycle industry? In the UK governments have relied on tax from vehicle tax, petrol tax and tax on anything related to vehicles having VAT. When that dwindles where will that money come from?
Unfortunately our Marxist overlords in Wales couldn't care less about business and tourism. They've already started charging a tourist tax and will implement blanket 20mph speed limits instead of 30mph in September despite massive opposition. They've also started looking at road pricing per mile. I'm afraid this is being implemented everywhere in the UK under different names and no matter what the public thinks the people pulling the strings in the background aren't listening.
@@simonchilli2088 Those industries will largley disappear and everyone will lose their jobs. The only cars will available will cost a million or so to buy be made in tiny numbers and only be for the billinaire elities and MPs. That's the plan.
This is what we need to do: 1) look into the rules of what we can or cannot do legally to run for Mayor of London. 2) Crowdfund to raise money for this if legal to do so. 3) Find a suitable candidate to stand as mayor with the correct policies and get voted in someone who will end the war on motorists
Engaging in the 'democratic process' is what got you into this mess in the first place. One definition of insanity is to repeat the same actions and expecting a different result. 'Suitable person', you're having a laugh...
you are ABSOLUTLY NAIVE - You think voting makes any difference? lol - You can only get in IF you're in The Club... and this ultimately leads to involvement with 'young children'. That's why Child-line with Ester Rantzen was created - YOU gave YOUR money to the 1000's of kiddie fiddlers in public office - and the BBC for years . Isn't that right Ted the Grocer?
I'd love to see the air polution statistics from the start of the first lockdown. That's as close to a car free set of data that could be collected. They always love to boast of their "scappage" schemes but completly miss the simple face that £2000 off a £20,000 new car doesn't make it remotely close to affordable to most drivers. If people could afford £18,000 for a car, they probably wouldn't be driving around in a £500 banger in the first place.
Human emissions went down 25% during lockdown. It had an effect on the atmosphere of less than 0.2%. In other words, 99% of co2 in the atmosphere..does NOT come from humans. Source: NOAA co2 global monitoring station Hawaii
@@FullFact548 They did for the 2008/9 scrappage scheme. It was only available for px on new cars. Although many dealerships matched the deals unofficially on recent used vehicles.
@@FullFact548 Nice name. Also I thought that the issue was carbon dioxide not "nitrogen dioxide" I would suggest not trying to implement nitrogen emission cuts on farmers then since "Reductions in transportation sector emissions are largely responsible for the NO2 anomalies" no need to cut back on meat then right? -Fact checked by... Research funded by... Anyway, just buy my patented "eco-friendly" government subsidised and enforced items. Gov: Why global lockdown was a good thing. Why inflation is actually good. How to deal with the Cost of Living crisis. Why you shouldn't ask for a pay rise. How to deal with stress and move on in life. How humans emit co2 by breathing. Why you're morally obligated to not procreate.
@@FullFact548 Really really interesting stuff there, could you point me to some peer reviewed literature so I can look further into the details? Also where does the estimated 8 million figure come from? Really surprised farm animals have been kept around this long considering the "threat" they pose. Recent news is that a bill in the EU has passed allowing Dutch gov to forcibly make Dutch farmers to sell their farm land to meet the emission targets. Also the "voluntary" option is they will buy it at 120% market value but you have to promise to not operate farms elsewhere in Netherlands or EU. Very interesting, they could have just payed them to not farm so they aren't forced to sell. Hard not to see it as a land grab whilst it's been well known the Dutch gov has been struggling for land to build housing...
@@markrainford1219 No. They will try and say it is but it won't be a correctly formatted invoice, according to the legal description of an invoice. AS you've never agreed to or signed a contract, how can they invoice you. You will also require an invoice for HMRC, so if they refuse they are inciting you into tax fraud. I've beaten parking companies twice until a crooked magistrate broke the law and judged against me. Problem is the whole system is corrupt.
@@BillCooper1776 hmm skeptical. If we ask for an invoice claiming we've not contracted to or for whatever fine. The enforcement agency will just site the relevant law, statute, regulation that gives them the "authority" to issue said fine?
If it was about pollution then the MOT emissions tests would be tightened, all cars that have an MOT will have had their emissions tested and are legal to drive anywhere in the country. It is all about filling TfL coffers with fines. Remember that cars over 40 years old will be exempt and their emissions will be very high.
If 9 out of 10 cars in outer London are already ULEZ compliant what difference will ULEZ make? How is the air being polluted by cars if 90% of them are already compliant?
Many petrol cars prior to Euro 4 may still be compliant. I have a 2001 Saab 93 2.0SE Turbo that's fine. It's down to your NOx emissions. TfL limit is 0.08g/km, my 93 comes in at 0.01g/km. The details should be on your Registration doc. Regarding bikes, I believe the figure is 0.15g/km most bikes should be compliant too. If it's not on your reg doc, check with the manufacturer. Failing that, there's several garages that will do it. Think the charge is around £160. You should get a Certificate of Conformity and then the vehicle has to be registered with TfL. I'll be doing this with my 30 year old Triumph Thunderbird 900 (when it finally gets repaired!).
My 03 mini cooper s is apparently compliant too. Thou haven't checked this officially yet. .. I've ust bought a motor bi-cycle and all bikes are charged 100£s for road tax. There's no emissions data on my motor bi-cycle log book. I will double check again....
My guzzi is euro 3 compliant, but khan's muppets charge me the same cost as a car ? Why should I pay extra to gave it declared compliant, I bought the bloody thing new because of its low emissions, yet I could buy an old brit thing that spits out oil and pollution and its e exempt Yet front gardens are still being ripped out to park more fatmobiles that will only do short polluting journeys
I wonder if the public who live in Greater London which used to be in Surrey, Kent, Middx etc would want their council to remove their borough out of Greater London? Maybe a pile should be done on this? Which would give less powers over the public and less moneys to TFL and running London that we may want to all distance our selfs from now. How councils would respond to this question?
If you are not named on the v5 and or the insurance address is not the same, the insurance company will end or invalidate your insurance. I noticed this year a well known insurance company wanted a copy of the V5, a live MOT certificate, a copy of your drving licence, a copy of your UKGateway digital driving licence showing any points, else they not insuring you.
Spot on. Do anything you can to screw up these schemes and I mean anything! Keep it going Geoff nice to see the channel growing. Censor tube wont like that but we do! My missus runs a compliant hybrid CHR and I run a very none compliant 2002 D4D Rav 4 which I love ! Manchester's scheme is on hold at present but should be scrapped Burnham is a twat!
The police read the rear number plate, but the ULEZZ reads the front plate, so having a false front number plate works aswell, just hope the police do not spot it. I like this new idea, a legal way to avoid paying.
I changed my car to a compliant car and a month afterwards the bastards made the roads adjacent to my borough a clean air zone. So I struggle to use the effing thing anyway. London really is a CRAPHOLE.
Unfortunately this won’t work. For speeding fines if they get no response from the registered keeper they check the insurance database and send a notice of intended prosecution to the person who has insured the car asking who the driver was. If the information is provided they prosecute the driver for speeding. If not they prosecute the insured person for failing to Identify the driver which is punishable by a fine and 6 penalty points. They will no doubt follow the same process for failure to pay the ULEZ charge.
@@s4owner The NIP must be served on the registered keeper within 14 days. Once that is done any other person can be required to provide information leading to the identity of the driver.
It's motor fraud buddy and it would not work. When you sign a V5C form there's a declaration on it that you sign to inform the DVLA that the information provided in the document is accurate. If the DVLA are informed by the nominated person that he did not agree to take ownership of the vehicle then the previous owner is going to get charged with a crime. I guarantee this didn't happen. It's just a tabloid story. This also isn't a new and novel idea. It's used by Fraudulent Taxi companies quite commonly and it does get investigated by the DVLA.
Bloody good idea! You didn't mention the other trick that lots of people are doing. A family member started getting parking fines, driving in bus lanes etc and when she looked at the photographs, its wasn't her car - someone had cloned her number plates. It was a much older Honda compared to hers. I am pissed off because she asked me to help dispute the violations, as English is not her first language. I wish the guy had looked at the cars of the Mayor's retinue and cloned their number plates. Contacting the Met seems to make little difference.
There's a thing I saw on UA-cam about how a guy bought a secrecy screen for a laptop, cut it to fit his number plate and showed how cameras can't read your number plate from above, although it was in America it still seems like a good idea
If you watch the film: inside man with Clive Owen. That film reveals another way that one could obfuscate the cameras vision. .. I'm not saying anymore....
I heard many years ago that spraying the number plates with HAIR SPRAY works well to combat cameras. I don't know how many coats were needed but anything is worth a try.
I remember in the 1800’s and early 1900’s when the Royal family was appalled to find out that 50 per cent of children in London didn’t make it to adult hood because of the industrial smoke and constant smog. Lung disease was very common. So they sent the teenagers to Crimea, India, Africa, France and Germany with guns, in uniforms to help with their breathing. Because we all know the leaders of Britain have ALWAYS been concerned about the ‘lungs’ of the citizens, which is why they closed ALL the mines, the Royal Family and Downing Street were in tears about the “poor lungs” of the workers.
A nonsense comment and if you believe it then you should know the Royal Family has no power of direction on such matters. It would be the UK Parliament that has been democratically elected under universal suffrage since 1918 with a more limited voting system since previously.
No it's not, the car owner has to have the car registered disabled on the log book and to get that you have to be getting pip entitlement on the higher rate mobility....
Loopholes get closed down, they are left on purpose initially until the majority go through the gate, then at that point the loopholes will also be closed down, they are fun, but nothing more. And detract us from the thing we should be doing about this.
callout for every one to stop paying these fascists. let it go to court. keep refusing. keep going to higher courts. they won't have the man power and you will see resistance from within.
Surely not a “genius” plan! When you tax the car with the “new owner/keeper” part of the V5 surely you become the new keeper!? 😂 or if you add another person as the new keeper and then tax it, you won’t be able to tax it again in future…. DOH! 😂
Apparently you don't need to pay if you are travelling for the purpose of "worship" so basically "Muslims" get away with it just like they don't "Legally" have to pay stamp duty because its not "Halal" 🤔🤔🤔
The approved emmission bands will certainly get tighter in a year or 2, excluding even more cars - till only electric cars pass - then from where will they replace this lost Fine "revenue" - same with Road Tax and duties/VAT on petrol/diesel, and eventually Resident Parking fees when no-one is left with a car, just a bike lol. We will be left with mainly buses, tube and local trains but being a linked monopoly even their prices will soar.
This won’t happen because pay per mile road pricing is coming in the next couple of years and what they are not telling people is that it will affect every vehicle even brand new or electric you will have to pay to drive any time anywhere.....
They will say as its now the Mayors car, he does not have permission to drive it, also the insurance could be invalid if the insurance company finds out.
I agree , if Everyone Refuses to pay. I don’t think they would ever be able to contend with the mass Paperwork. Khan is a Normal Politician attacking those Who can Not fight Back.
Sadiq Khan’s, to reduce toxic air by expanding the ULEZ to greater London will not work. He doesn’t really care about toxic air quality and here is why: - He has already made the toxic air far worse since he has introduced the LTN’s which have increased the toxic air on the main roads because we are forced to use them as there are no other alternatives, especially during rush hour. The roads are now grid locked with traffic moving at walking pace and the fumes are getting denser and not dispersing. LTN’s need to be reopened as it is causing more damage than good. Among all this, the mileage in vehicles has also increased due to the fact that we are forced to go the long way round to get to the required destination - all accumulating to even more emission being emitted! Bravo Sadiq & team. - The health for pedestrians and children as they walk along these main routes to get to stations, schools, shops is deteriorating. Even the drivers inhale more fumes when we are stuck in stationary traffic. This is really aggravating and makes no sense! - Cycle Lanes: Should not be taking up an extra lane of the roads, large pavements could be divided into two for cyclists. - The introductions of 20MPH roads are also a problem because emission fumes don’t disperse quickly and the air is getting even more polluted because of the need to drive in lower gears. Sadiq’s statement: “It is to reduce toxic air pollution” is clearly not accurate and is making matters worse. The situation is getting extremely out of hand and something needs to be done to stop him from ruining our climate even more. He should resign and Londoners should vote for someone who will make London a greater and more desirable place to live in. There needs to be a more logical and strategic plan that is well thought. Vinnie Lauda
TURN IT AROUND ON THEM! It's all based on the law of CONTRACTS. It is simply an offer & acceptance. Refusal is seen by the courts as " acceptance" by dis-honor. Therefore, NEVER REFUSE, ALWAYS submit a written COUNTER-OFFER. I would respond with a WRITTEN conditional acceptance of their offer! I would gladly comply provided the city of London and the Mayor agree to purchase a new car to replace the outdated car and I would give them 20 days to respond by mail ONLY. The Mayor's REFUSAL to respond shall be deemed the Mayor's "acknowledgment, full acceptance, and agreement "to be financially responsible to pay in full all ULEZ charges upon demand. Send the Counter offer to the Mayor by certified delivery. Keep a record of the counter-offer and the Mayor's failure to RESPOND to YOU. Address everything to the Mayor's address and use his full name! Then if the issue goes to court, show the counter-offer and Mayor's FAILURE to RESPOND to your Counter-Offer.
All those who think they are somehow the exception to reality, should try this simple experiment: park in any garage, run your engine and see what happens. Breathing problems? Where do you think your exhaust gases go, when you drive down your street, past your kids' school, the hospital where your family member is sick, your place of work, your own house? When you sit in your own car, in the traffic? You think you and your own loved ones don't need to breathe? Cannot get cancer, asthma, heart disease, stroke? See how long you last, with the engine running in that garage, then think again.
I was told that the air was polluted in the 1950s but I have never known the air to be polluted apart from central London and that's because it's central London.
The owner is separate from the days when we used Hire Purchase agreement to buy a car. It ensures that the car remains owned by the HP company and may be reclaimed easily instead of using courts etc. Why not set up a car hire company based offshore if possible and register the car under the company. You can insure an old unused vehicle perhaps a classic which enables you to drive any car NOT hired or owned by you.
That makes no sense at all, because the person using the car is the keeper, and Khan will just deny being the keeper when the logbook arrives at his office. In effect, the person that has falsified the log book details is guilty of fraudulent representation in order to commit offences, ie, ULEZ penalties, Speeding tickets, Parking Tickets, etc.
The problem with this brilliant idea is that when Khan gets the fines in the post he has all the details of the vehicle. All he has to do is report it the police as being stolen.
To my mind, Sadtwat wouldn't like the roads of HIS city clogged up for a few hours on certain days if everyone drove into London and brought the city to a standstill. Rinse and repeat until he gets the message. Someone has already commented that the French wouldn't put up with this. Maybe we are a soft touch..??
I agree with Sadik on this one. People love to show their willingness to do things that promotes healthy living and caring for other people and even animals. They at least love to boast about their love for others and nature. However, that all goes out the window when they need to pay. All of a sudden children breathing in polluted air is not important. I lived in London. I can tell you that petrol fumes can be smelt in some part of London. Sadik has got this one right. And since when did he drive a 500k car. Is that even true. Seriously, a 500k car. They will happily pay lots of money on junk food and feed their children that rubbish, but 12.5 a day, if your car needs, is way too much for healthy cleaner air.
Sorry mate, I have seen Mr Khan and his minders , getting into his armour plated, bulletproof Range Rover, about four tonnes of the thing,even the wheels are bulletproof It has a massive engine as well He could have bought a London cab, 35K of them running around, would be a harder target to hit
Look the roads are clogged and those rich people are getting stuck in traffic jams, how dare the poor drive cars, and then complain bout taxes, wage cuts, proffetering, and energy slavery.
Sadiq Khan is the new sheriff of Nottingham and the Blade Runners are Robin Hood. Loopholes are a waste of time and will get a lawyer onto you for some thing you've missed as the wealthiest person (TFL)gets the best lawyer and they win in a court room.
A couple of problems to the idea. He could automatically claim it is stolen at which you not only have no insurance, but can be arrested for vehicle theft and maybe fraud!
ULEZ !!😂😂All of that camera and payment infrastructure for rapidly diminishing 4% of vehicles? Wait for the 'Pay per mile journey tax on ALL vehicles to be announced.
There is no climate crisis, it is simply a UN plot to force world Communism on us all.
I’ve pinned this comment. Just in case. Wink wink
Indeed the YT MindCrime patrol would likely nuke it
Causes of global pollution:
1. The transport industry (planes, ships)
2. wars
3. mining
4. All kinds of cheaply made stuff: People prefer to buy 5 cheap t-shirts instead of just a good one. Cheap clothes get trashed very quickly while expensive well made clothes can last for years. Cheap clothes tend to be made in unregulated factories that pollute a lot. People keep buying and throwing away soon after. An italian made 100€+ shirt can last for 8 years or so.
5. Sheeple consumist mentality: Im a right wing guy and Im all about capitalism but lets be honest the sheeple consumist mentality benefits the companies but harms the environment. People lease a cheaply made premium car for 3-4 years (most premium cars nowadays have internal parts made of plastic and other crap) instead of keeping their old car in perfect condition (which would be better for the environment), just cause they want to compete against their neighbours and have a flashier car than them. The only thing they are competing against is their own debt. In the past, people saved money and bought a car in cash and kept it for 15 years or so.
5. the sheeple mentality of buying a new Iphone every year when you could use the same Iphone for 5 years, etc... are the real causes of global pollution and not your average joe using his gas powered MOT approved hatchback to drive to work. Also lots of idiots buy very big SUVs that they dont really need just because they want others to think they are rich. Consumism and global pollution cant cohabitate together. If people really wanted to save the planet they would be repairing their old stuff. If people didn't base their self esteem on the material stuff they own and they kept their old stuff in great condition and they were more careful about the stuff they buy global pollution would decrease.
On the other hand if people really cared about the environment they wouldn't consume so much and so much cheap stuff but this would have a negative impact on the economy.
Its very hard to find a balance between reducing global pollution and not negatively impacting the economy.
Also this ULEZ law is silly and is discriminating against the people that own old cars that have passed all the emission tests and run in perfect condition.
-
An average joe that drives to work in his old frugal MOT approved hatchback is NOT the main cause of global pollution, he shouldn't be punished with these unfair laws. I bet you that a dumbass that drives a brand new V8 "plug-in hybrid" Porsche Cayenne to take his 1 son to school never uses the electric motor on his 2500 kg SUV. And Im not against people buying cool toys, everyone is free to do whatever they want with their money, its just that these laws dont make any sense and punish the average joe and all the car repair businesses that would be working on these older cars.
Sorry for my english, im drunk
Communitarianism, communism controlled by fascist billionaires.
We know, but we do nothing about it.
You don’t need a LOOP HOLE, EVERYONE JUST NEEDS TO REFUSE TO PAY IT.
Like Birmingham
Absolutely agree 💯
Totally 100% agree !!!
Absolutely! Coming expansion of ULEZ in London is a great test on how far people can go for their freedom and how many of us. This expansion is clearly “an offer” but not “an order”. There is no even legal basis under it, never mind lawful. It is an offer to pay for “something” and threats for not agreeing on ”the offer”. This is clearly a daylight robbery in 21st century style. Mass rejection of ”the offer” and non-compliance would send a massive signal to THEM - We are the people are not the slaves; Keep your hands off us and our future.
Would People be able to show who is the master, like people of Birmingham did? I very much hope so.
If everyone refuse’s to pay then it clearly isn’t in the public interest and no one should be prosecuted
Forget loopholes. Mass non-compliance is the only way to beat it
It worked with the poll tax
Or join the Robin Hood Gang and "attend to" the cameras. If thousands showed the courage they do the problems would be "removed" in quick time.
@@wyattfamily8997Are you endorsing criminal behaviour, like Greenpeace did the other week?
@@alfsmith4936It is your moral duty to resist unjust laws.
Agreed
Great Britain belongs to the people, not a few politicians!
London isn't a part of UK. Just Google for the answer's.
No, it does not and never has.
Not in this timeline. Here, it's the opposite. Wish I was in your timeline
The answer is very simple, everyone ignore it. Throw away any letters, ignore any communication. If millions of people did this it could not be viable.
Or write across it that you do not consent or wish to contract with this unlawful scheme of extortion and they must cease and desist any further unlawful demands, keep a copy for your records and post the original back to them.
It's exactly what needs to happen to UKEZ, health passports any social credit system 15 min cities and the rest of what they have planned
You're just creating a - Feeding-Frenzy for bailiffs.
@@FullFact548 No it is not lawful unless you contract to it and/or give your consent.
@@coolbreez773 you're just creating a slave society!
I have an old Ford Galaxy diesel ..... it runs perfectly, and always passes it's MOT with ease. I registered the car to my brother a few years ago when the ULEZ zones started. It's accrued thousands of ULEZ notifications and fines. I'm waiting for them to come and try to collect the fines. My brother died 6 years ago, so good luck with that. But this one registering it in Khan's name seems an even better idea
Simply brilliant, but I’m sorry for your loss (and your brothers unfortunate debt)
@@GeoffBuysCars Thank you. Obviously not something anyone would want to happen, but I know he would have approved 100% I was just going to register the car in a ficticious name, but saw the opportunity ...... but the idea is the same .....
@@garyfromlondon Mind if I make this into a funny anonymous video?
@@GeoffBuysCars no problem, it could give some interesting viewing
What’s stoping sadiq khan from scrapping the car and pocketing the cash if he’s now the registered owner?
As others have said if everyone refused to pay, this would fall apart in weeks.
Wrong. There would be an order to drain their bank account.
@@rogerphelps9939Cash is king stand against card transactions anything digital is evil and wrong the government can control weather or not your family eats because they have control of your funds however physical cash you'll have to pry from my dead body
Not enough leverage from a minority group. Despite the incorrect propaganda, over 90% of vehicles driven in the Ulez are exempt. Of those that are not, only a small percentage fail to pay the fee and of those, only a tiny percent fail to pay the penalty charge. This means they are an easy target for the courts and bailifs.
Well in Australia if you don't pay your fines they just suspend your licence until the fine has been payed, they will find away to make you pay
Doesnt need to be everyone, im tax free since 2021. Cowards deserve to live in their little world of tyranny
If I lived in London I wouldn’t pay this TAX . I was a POLL TAX protester and didn’t pay ( even after bailiffs turned up ) and Maggie Thatcher was out in 6 months . Unite everyone 👍
Lot of good that did, we ended up with Council Tax anyway, and now pay more than we would have done, doh.
I was taken to Court for non payment of Poll Tax.....Judge wiped out the Debt !
@@settertwo all that does is put the burden on everyone else to pay for things that you think you're entitled to for free, no doubt you vote Tory
If I lived in London bla blah.... But u don't and thus don't have to prove Yr empty words. Give us a break!
Refuse to pay stand firm on this total rip off don't pay, there skint now all stand together 😊
This wouldnt happen in France - They just wreck the place if the government do stuff like this !
Exactly... British people moan and then do little else
I've lived in France for nearly twenty years and for your information every large city in France has a similar system, but nobody rioted ! Why ? Because the French are more intelligent than the English.
@@brianferguson7840 Stop walking round with blinkers on you dopey goofball. Shithole France is rioting all the time...zzz
@@brianferguson7840the french intelligent lol u must be a moron
@@brianferguson7840 They aren't if they accepted this as it is not founded in any real science and no one has rioted in the UK so what are you on about?
Non payment of fines is obviously the real answer. The problem is getting all drivers to unite in one cause, everybody needs to stop paying the fines.
They will just do like Australia if you don't pay your fines your licence goes under FINES SUSPENSION and you got no licence at all until the fine is payed and only then your LICENCE SUSPENSION is lifted, non payment of the fines won't change a thing they will make sure of it
The stupid thing is if Khan was really worried about people's health he should close all the fast food outlets.
More people have been victims of knife crime and mass immigration than car emissions.
And maybe stop corruption in the met and stop young people stabbing the shit outta each other !
@Max Black
What demographic is to blame for that? I'm fed up with other communities' problems being laid at the door of the white man all the time.
And stop using his Rang Rover and lead buy example and ride a bike 🚲 like Boris did when he was mayor but then people liked Boris 😂 I don't think Khan we ould dare ride a 🚲 to work .
@@josephborg5938 OMG just picturing Boris wobbling to work on his bike, and Khan in an armoured motorcade. Speaks volumes doesn't it.
Stop complying and don't pay it, if enough do this it all falls down just like Birmingham🤷♂️
It got stopped in Birmingham?
@@ln5747 Almost 70,000 wiped off.
@@kevinwilding7825 70k what?
@@ln5747 Fines
@@pmullen4491
Ha ha, bet Birmingham City Council hasn't scrapped the scheme though😂😂
My car is gender car fluent and identifies as a ulez compliant vehicle for the rest of its mechanical life.
That works too.
Awesome one!!
@@dinkydaz6711 it's got nothing to do with religion. There are corrupt individuals in every religion
Love that comment!
🤣 I might have to use this 🤔My car identifies as a pushbike...was born in the wrong body...it's preferred pronoun is compliant 😂
It's very funny, but looking for loopholes is acceptance of the rule. Protest this outside your MPs and Kahn's houses. If they make life uncomfortable for us then we make it worse for them.
In political philosophy, the phrase 'consent of the governed' refers to the idea that a government's legitimacy and moral right to use state power, is justified and lawful only when consented to by the people or society over which that political power is exercised.
In a democracy, politicians take their orders from the majority, if they refuse to seek consent - they should be sacked. If they don't get sacked, legal action should be taken. If legal action is not possible - revolution is required to purge the corruption.
Brilliant
We had an opportunity to scrap ULEZ in the last mayoral election
Just remember we don't really live in a democracy we just get to vote for another dictator
Its way over time that people are just waking JP to this 😬😬😬
We get to vote for one of "their" dictator puppets owned and controlled by them, it's like choosing between a dog sh*t, cat sh*t and rat sh*t sandwich and then being told "well you chose it".
Why doesn't he tackle the toxic air in the underground? If cars at one seventh of the level of the tube, the tube is killing thousands.
Ban vegetarians from using the tube or impose a flatulence scale of fines on the commuters.
Inept maintenance on the ventilation. 100% incompetence on behalf of the local "government". Another fine example of children trying to be rulers.
@@Squidgy55 How dare you criticise children....
I was on the tube the other day and it really stank so that when this guy farted people thanked him for the fresh air.
@@jasonking1284 Yes, that was unjustified. I should have called them what they are. Clowns, bought and paid for.
I don't know how else to get my message across. I am a ventilation engineer and my area is the whole of the South East of England. The worst polluted place on my patch is Kensington and Chelsea where they have supposedly been protected by the congestion charge since the early 2000s and the ULEZ from it's inception. Most places have new filters every 12 months but there it is every 6 months and the filters are black every time. In the outer boroughs like Bromley or Havering they are only grey after a year. The Zones have no effect on pollution whatsoever. I agree that pollution needs dealing with but they don't have any working solution yet. Also people in the Zone pay for it whether they drive or not. Maintenance people like me pass the charge on to customers all the time.
In 2020 we said it was to get us used to the upcoming climate lockdowns but everyone labelled us and laugh. 😡😡😡
They now have a list of the double jabbered sheep, and a list of the non jabbed "troublemakers".
@@user-pf5xq3lq8ithere are millions of people who are refusing to comply, fuck their jabs, fuck their wars fuck the government
ULEZ isn't to do with climate... it's air quality.
@@gitanonumero1983good one
One of our cars is registered in my dad's name at his old address (I incorrectly said "my car" initially). He died over 20 years ago. As far as I'm concerned, if it's OK for them to use underhand tactics to extract more money from us then it's perfectly OK for us to use underhand tactics to protect ourselves. People, always remember that the roads do NOT belong to the government and councils to be used as a cash cow, they are PUBLIC roads.
As for pollution, scientists proved many years ago that brake dust is one of the biggest problems for people with asthma - yet thanks to congestion, which is often caused by removing available roads to use as bus lanes etc - there is MORE brake dust in the air than ever before. So "traffic calming" schemes etc. are probably at least partly responsible for the increase in children with asthma. This is one of the reasons I don't believe the "clean air" bollox.
Compounded by non-compliant gas guzzlers continuing to poison the air at £12.50/day ULEZ charge.
Not least that 'traffic calming' increases local emissions from braking, acceleration and noise...right outside front doors, school gates and hospital gates. World class bollocks!
I think you never heard the term induced demand my friend and is a bus lane really that bad? Honestly I enjoy them as then my bus can speed right through the traffic.
@@Mgameing123 Yes, bus lanes are great - if you're on a bus. But it's nothing to do with demand, it's about trying to force cars off the road. There are countless areas where there are bus lanes in operation 24/7 where buses only run once an hour, or once every 30 minutes or so up until a certain time, or not on Sundays etc.
But that's not the point. The point is it's forcing other traffic off the roads, making drivers take a longer route and so on, NONE of which is helping the environment which is what the ULEZ thing is supposedly all about.
Besides, buses are now just a private enterprise, in it for profit, why should they get any priority on roads that we all pay for? As I keep on reminding people, these are PUBLIC roads, not for certain people to use or for councils to do what they like with for financial benefit.
All newer cars, especially EVs are heavier than older cars, so even more brake dust, because of the extra kinetic energy that needs stopping.
Great stuff! Well done Geoff! If a couple of thousand people do this it would be something 😂
It could be better! If everyone in the country with a scrap car (MOT Failures) signed it over to Sadiq Khan it would cause chaos for him
As said previously, if it was about pollution and the populations health he would just ban the vehicles and not fine the owners, he is such a weasel old Mayor Khan't!
It took a bit of time but another UA-camr managed to make his 99 plate 1.7 Puma exempt by contacting the manufacturer and getting proof of its NOX value but he's owned it a very long time so it was worth it, i really hope we don't lose more retro/classics due to Mr Weasels money grabbing scrappage scheme!
A weasle in an armoured 3 tonne Range Rover..
@@greatestytcommentator Yep talk about hypocrisy.
How is outright banning these care better than having a fine to pay to use them? People with classic cars can still drive them as much as their budget allows, and it just feeds into the standard cost/benefit calculation we all do anyway (having a car of any type isn’t free from costs of course!) London is already incredibly navigable without a car, I really wish my city was more like that.
@@rainbowevil It just proves that its not about emissions and public health which is the excuse he uses for it, its just another money grab to help fund his mismanagement of TFL etc.
Because it reveals his true intention..propping up the car industry and damaging the low cost fuel industry.
Malicious rules should be ignored
Yes it is your duty.
Keep sending them SAR for copies of all the videos and photos they have on you.
Then send the order that the data be deleted.
Also demand the names of the companies or people who have bought the data off them. You can then repeat the process with them.
Love it 🙏
❤
Gold
@@diannawhyte9595 I told a copper about this idea today, and he had a fit of laughter. Then I added on the Kahn mask, icing on top, ....
@@diannawhyte9595 Sorry wrong thread. The Khan bit is people registering their vehicles with Khan as the register keeper. Then all fines are sent to him, and he has to identify the driver. Clearly he's not going to know who the driver is, so he takes the fine.
Now if you do that, say and you are clearly black, white or chinese, or female, all you have to do is wear a Khan mask.
Then when the look at the video, or your brief shows it to the court, with you sitting their saying nothing as is your right, the other side looks very stupid.
Another new loophole is just to reject the fine as it's based on anpr and anpr can't be used as evidence anymore due to 1.7 million cloned number plates in the UK, so it's not really a loophole but a legal remedy.
there was a ruling recently (soz I don't have the data) that fines via cameras are non valid...... I'm looking forward to claiming back £180 from Birmingham Council....
I do love that he has to identify the driver in the case of a fine.
And if he fails to do so he is responsible for paying the fine!
@@pauls3075 exactly! Now what the person who registered with him is make sure someone else is driving. For example he is on a flight at the time of the offence. The reason is khan will say the driver was the donor. But with proof he is in the air, khan has perverted the course of justice
There was an old Columbo episode where someone wore a mask that was a photo of someone else's face.
☝☝
@@fredmercury1314 yes! Then you pass the mask to someone else to repeat and rinse.
As a repeat offender his fines should rapidly increase
@@fredmercury1314
Wear a Sadiq Khant mask.
Even if your current car is ULEZ compliant, they will forever raise the bar so that one day it won't be. Then there'll be the push for EVs only in London. I also still think it's hypocritical to allow people to pollute as long as they pay. WTF!
I might be wrong but I don’t think they will go for road charging just yet. If they go too fast it will cause a huge stir and they will have non payment trouble (until digital ID anyway). My bet is they tighten the ULEZ standards a few times first to condition the public into accepting being charged to drive on their own roads.
Digital ID comes September.
1.Scotland’s current position
This research project draws together Scottish, UK and international examples and baseline
evidence on the concept of ‘20 minute neighbourhoods’, and how it can be best translated in
a Scottish context. The project identifies areas of good practice, and takes account of our
geography, demography, economy, governance and relevant policy drivers to inform the
translation of the concept.
The Scottish Government defines a 20 minute neighbourhood as:
‘where people can meet their needs within a 20 minute walk from their house -
enabling people to live better, healthier lives and supporting our net zero ambitions.’
2
The project had two main aims:
1. To consider the ambition for 20 minute neighbourhoods in Scotland, taking
account of the differing settlement patterns across the country, and to highlight
interventions that would support delivery of the concept, supported by findings
from a baseline analysis
2. To analyse international evidence of the success of interventions to achieve
these ambitions, including identifying specific success factors, place-making
impacts, barriers to success, regulatory frameworks, funding mechanisms and
stakeholder engagement and buy-in.
The Scottish policy context is defined in section 1.1, while the details of the definition of a 20
minute neighbourhood and the desired outcomes are explained in section 1.2. The baseline
methodology and results are set out in sections 1.3 and 1.4. Section 2 presents the evidence
from UK and international case studies. Feedback from a range of stakeholders informed the
subsequent suggested ambitions and recommendations for implementation, see
organisations listed in Appendix C. ...... !!!
@@GeoffBuysCarsafter the consultation ressult?
That's why they were desperate to keep the recent global "health emergancy" going as long as possible because they needed more time to phase in their social credit system (health passport). Also note suddenly it's a "climate crisis" this phrase has replaced the previous "health crisis". Before 2020 it was never called "climate crisis" but since the first "crisis" Didn't last long enough they've had to make another one to justify totalitarianism.
@@GeoffBuysCars
For what exactly?
In Aberdeen there's not a fee, but a fine of £60 or £30 if paid within 14 days for non compliant vehicles, this comes into place in June, how can a council extort money like this?
Sadiq Khan *won’t* be able to go around to the owner of that car’s house, because thanks to the Data Protection Act, he won’t be able to see the previous keeper’s address on his new logbook! 😆
Private parking companies pay for data so they can post fines out to the correct address.
@@Applepie409people who pay these private companies invoices are probably same people who pay TV licence etc, simpletons who love being ripped off.
5:03 and dont forget mould in our homes ESPECIALLY now that many cannot afford to heat their homes properly during winter. Currently investigqting this further and going to approach some media outlets that might run with it.
I asked TfL for data to back up the ULEZ... was met with radio silence.
As far as I'm concerned if I have paid vehicle tax/road tax I've paid to use His majesty's roads. If a town or an area of a town is going to implement road charging to collect money from visitors or people passing thru their areas then when people from that or those areas leave their areas they must pay to leave them. How would all the schemes affect the travel industry. In particular areas such as Cornwall and Wales who rely quite a bit on tourism? Not been clearly thought thru like the 15 minute prisons, oops sorry, cities has it?
Unfortunately I think it has been very well planned. ULEZ and 15 minute cities are one and the same thing. Clean air zone cameras essentially geofence an entire area, the standards can then tighten until the public is priced out of private transport. There’s your 15 minute city.
@@chevchelios8582 Then what happens to the car/motorcycle industry? In the UK governments have relied on tax from vehicle tax, petrol tax and tax on anything related to vehicles having VAT. When that dwindles where will that money come from?
Unfortunately our Marxist overlords in Wales couldn't care less about business and tourism. They've already started charging a tourist tax and will implement blanket 20mph speed limits instead of 30mph in September despite massive opposition. They've also started looking at road pricing per mile. I'm afraid this is being implemented everywhere in the UK under different names and no matter what the public thinks the people pulling the strings in the background aren't listening.
@@simonchilli2088 Those industries will largley disappear and everyone will lose their jobs. The only cars will available will cost a million or so to buy be made in tiny numbers and only be for the billinaire elities and MPs. That's the plan.
His majesty is a big boss in the WEF gang. Good luck with that.
This is what we need to do: 1) look into the rules of what we can or cannot do legally to run for Mayor of London. 2) Crowdfund to raise money for this if legal to do so. 3) Find a suitable candidate to stand as mayor with the correct policies and get voted in someone who will end the war on motorists
Engaging in the 'democratic process' is what got you into this mess in the first place. One definition of insanity is to repeat the same actions and expecting a different result. 'Suitable person', you're having a laugh...
you are ABSOLUTLY NAIVE - You think voting makes any difference? lol - You can only get in IF you're in The Club... and this ultimately leads to involvement with 'young children'. That's why Child-line with Ester Rantzen was created - YOU gave YOUR money to the 1000's of kiddie fiddlers in public office - and the BBC for years . Isn't that right Ted the Grocer?
Seeing the money from fines are being used to party,and assist the Muslim community..so love this guys brilliant...
I'd love to see the air polution statistics from the start of the first lockdown. That's as close to a car free set of data that could be collected.
They always love to boast of their "scappage" schemes but completly miss the simple face that £2000 off a £20,000 new car doesn't make it remotely close to affordable to most drivers. If people could afford £18,000 for a car, they probably wouldn't be driving around in a £500 banger in the first place.
Human emissions went down 25% during lockdown. It had an effect on the atmosphere of less than 0.2%. In other words, 99% of co2 in the atmosphere..does NOT come from humans.
Source: NOAA co2 global monitoring station Hawaii
Lies. You are WEF/77th brigade. Your UA-cam account was created less than 1 month ago.
@@FullFact548 They did for the 2008/9 scrappage scheme. It was only available for px on new cars. Although many dealerships matched the deals unofficially on recent used vehicles.
@@FullFact548 Nice name. Also I thought that the issue was carbon dioxide not "nitrogen dioxide" I would suggest not trying to implement nitrogen emission cuts on farmers then since "Reductions in transportation sector emissions are largely responsible for the NO2 anomalies" no need to cut back on meat then right? -Fact checked by... Research funded by... Anyway, just buy my patented "eco-friendly" government subsidised and enforced items. Gov: Why global lockdown was a good thing. Why inflation is actually good. How to deal with the Cost of Living crisis. Why you shouldn't ask for a pay rise. How to deal with stress and move on in life. How humans emit co2 by breathing. Why you're morally obligated to not procreate.
@@FullFact548 Really really interesting stuff there, could you point me to some peer reviewed literature so I can look further into the details? Also where does the estimated 8 million figure come from? Really surprised farm animals have been kept around this long considering the "threat" they pose.
Recent news is that a bill in the EU has passed allowing Dutch gov to forcibly make Dutch farmers to sell their farm land to meet the emission targets. Also the "voluntary" option is they will buy it at 120% market value but you have to promise to not operate farms elsewhere in Netherlands or EU.
Very interesting, they could have just payed them to not farm so they aren't forced to sell. Hard not to see it as a land grab whilst it's been well known the Dutch gov has been struggling for land to build housing...
Wait for the fine and ask for an invoice. They can't produce the invoice because you've never contracted with them.
Would that really work?
The fine notification IS an invoice, isn't it?
@@flowwesterly6136 Google the BOEVAT Remedy
@@markrainford1219 No. They will try and say it is but it won't be a correctly formatted invoice, according to the legal description of an invoice. AS you've never agreed to or signed a contract, how can they invoice you. You will also require an invoice for HMRC, so if they refuse they are inciting you into tax fraud. I've beaten parking companies twice until a crooked magistrate broke the law and judged against me. Problem is the whole system is corrupt.
@@BillCooper1776 hmm skeptical.
If we ask for an invoice claiming we've not contracted to or for whatever fine.
The enforcement agency will just site the relevant law, statute, regulation that gives them the "authority" to issue said fine?
what a great idea everyone should do this
The cameras still need to come down, any way you like, no matter what.
If it was about pollution then the MOT emissions tests would be tightened, all cars that have an MOT will have had their emissions tested and are legal to drive anywhere in the country.
It is all about filling TfL coffers with fines.
Remember that cars over 40 years old will be exempt and their emissions will be very high.
If 9 out of 10 cars in outer London are already ULEZ compliant what difference will ULEZ make?
How is the air being polluted by cars if 90% of them are already compliant?
Many petrol cars prior to Euro 4 may still be compliant. I have a 2001 Saab 93 2.0SE Turbo that's fine. It's down to your NOx emissions. TfL limit is 0.08g/km, my 93 comes in at 0.01g/km. The details should be on your Registration doc.
Regarding bikes, I believe the figure is 0.15g/km most bikes should be compliant too. If it's not on your reg doc, check with the manufacturer. Failing that, there's several garages that will do it. Think the charge is around £160. You should get a Certificate of Conformity and then the vehicle has to be registered with TfL. I'll be doing this with my 30 year old Triumph Thunderbird 900 (when it finally gets repaired!).
My 03 mini cooper s is apparently compliant too.
Thou haven't checked this officially yet.
..
I've ust bought a motor bi-cycle and all bikes are charged 100£s for road tax.
There's no emissions data on my motor bi-cycle log book.
I will double check again....
@@stuartd9741 of there isn't any data for your bike, contact the manufacturer first.
Good advice
My guzzi is euro 3 compliant, but khan's muppets charge me the same cost as a car ? Why should I pay extra to gave it declared compliant, I bought the bloody thing new because of its low emissions, yet I could buy an old brit thing that spits out oil and pollution and its e exempt
Yet front gardens are still being ripped out to park more fatmobiles that will only do short polluting journeys
People should film Mr Kahn more driving his big SUV and keep posting them
Love it. I've got 2 old bangers for him. Thank you
I wonder if the public who live in Greater London which used to be in Surrey, Kent, Middx etc would want their council to remove their borough out of Greater London?
Maybe a pile should be done on this?
Which would give less powers over the public and less moneys to TFL and running London that we may want to all distance our selfs from now.
How councils would respond to this question?
"Glexit"‽
If you are not named on the v5 and or the insurance address is not the same, the insurance company will end or invalidate your insurance.
I noticed this year a well known insurance company wanted a copy of the V5, a live MOT certificate, a copy of your drving licence, a copy of your UKGateway digital driving licence showing any points, else they not insuring you.
Ulez is not really about old cars. It's just the Start. 5 years time everyone will getting fined if not electric. God help us
Spot on. Do anything you can to screw up these schemes and I mean anything! Keep it going Geoff nice to see the channel growing. Censor tube wont like that but we do! My missus runs a compliant hybrid CHR and I run a very none compliant 2002 D4D Rav 4 which I love ! Manchester's scheme is on hold at present but should be scrapped Burnham is a twat!
Cut the poles down , remove the cameras , paint them , and all stick to not paying as in Birmingham's case .
@@paulwainwright6903 100% spot on
@@wideyxyz2271 they did this I France in the end it cost them so much that they gave up putting them back .
@Paul Wainwright And thats what beeds to be done (and is happening) here . 👍🏻💯💥
The police read the rear number plate, but the ULEZZ reads the front plate, so having a false front number plate works aswell, just hope the police do not spot it.
I like this new idea, a legal way to avoid paying.
They done this from poll tax too council tax
I changed my car to a compliant car and a month afterwards the bastards made the roads adjacent to my borough a clean air zone. So I struggle to use the effing thing anyway. London really is a CRAPHOLE.
Unfortunately this won’t work. For speeding fines if they get no response from the registered keeper they check the insurance database and send a notice of intended prosecution to the person who has insured the car asking who the driver was. If the information is provided they prosecute the driver for speeding. If not they prosecute the insured person for failing to Identify the driver which is punishable by a fine and 6 penalty points. They will no doubt follow the same process for failure to pay the ULEZ charge.
They only get 14 days to issue a NIP, including weekends and Bank Holidays
@@s4owner The NIP must be served on the registered keeper within 14 days. Once that is done any other person can be required to provide information leading to the identity of the driver.
It's motor fraud buddy and it would not work. When you sign a V5C form there's a declaration on it that you sign to inform the DVLA that the information provided in the document is accurate. If the DVLA are informed by the nominated person that he did not agree to take ownership of the vehicle then the previous owner is going to get charged with a crime. I guarantee this didn't happen. It's just a tabloid story. This also isn't a new and novel idea. It's used by Fraudulent Taxi companies quite commonly and it does get investigated by the DVLA.
Bloody good idea! You didn't mention the other trick that lots of people are doing. A family member started getting parking fines, driving in bus lanes etc and when she looked at the photographs, its wasn't her car - someone had cloned her number plates. It was a much older Honda compared to hers. I am pissed off because she asked me to help dispute the violations, as English is not her first language. I wish the guy had looked at the cars of the Mayor's retinue and cloned their number plates. Contacting the Met seems to make little difference.
Refuse to pay the fine, appeal, clog the entire system up. If thousands do it the system will not be able to function
There's a thing I saw on UA-cam about how a guy bought a secrecy screen for a laptop, cut it to fit his number plate and showed how cameras can't read your number plate from above, although it was in America it still seems like a good idea
Good idea. 👍
If you watch the film: inside man with Clive Owen.
That film reveals another way that one could obfuscate the cameras vision.
..
I'm not saying anymore....
I heard many years ago that spraying the number plates with HAIR SPRAY works well to combat cameras. I don't know how many coats were needed but anything is worth a try.
I remember in the 1800’s and early 1900’s when the Royal family was appalled to find out that 50 per cent of children in London didn’t make it to adult hood because of the industrial smoke and constant smog. Lung disease was very common. So they sent the teenagers to Crimea, India, Africa, France and Germany with guns, in uniforms to help with their breathing.
Because we all know the leaders of Britain have ALWAYS been concerned about the ‘lungs’ of the citizens, which is why they closed ALL the mines, the Royal Family and Downing Street were in tears about the “poor lungs” of the workers.
A nonsense comment and if you believe it then you should know the Royal Family has no power of direction on such matters. It would be the UK Parliament that has been democratically elected under universal suffrage since 1918 with a more limited voting system since previously.
The sooner Khan is kicked out of power the better, hopefully he’ll also be charged for prematurely rolling out the cameras!
Your car is also exempt if you have a disability badge ✌️
Didn’t know this. Thanks for sharing.
car has to be registered on it's taxation class as disabled... that's different to having a disabled badge!
Why
Awesome, didn't know that.. Thanks
No it's not, the car owner has to have the car registered disabled on the log book and to get that you have to be getting pip entitlement on the higher rate mobility....
Isn't there a chance that the "new owner" would come around and just scrap the old vehicles "gifted" to him ??
Pure quality content pal ✌️ ♥ 🎸 🍻 😂
Vote them out, get a council that will scrap this.
Loopholes get closed down, they are left on purpose initially until the majority go through the gate, then at that point the loopholes will also be closed down, they are fun, but nothing more. And detract us from the thing we should be doing about this.
Spot on.
These loopholes are meant to get wealthy off fines..
As soon as a loophole is public knowledge it will be closed down....
My car passes it's MOT on emissions but is not legal in London. It's complete bollocks
callout for every one to stop paying these fascists. let it go to court. keep refusing. keep going to higher courts.
they won't have the man power and you will see resistance from within.
Surely not a “genius” plan! When you tax the car with the “new owner/keeper” part of the V5 surely you become the new keeper!? 😂 or if you add another person as the new keeper and then tax it, you won’t be able to tax it again in future…. DOH! 😂
Anyone can tax the car it doesn't have to be the new keeper as long as the vehicle is taxed.
That's what I thought.
Apparently you don't need to pay if you are travelling for the purpose of "worship" so basically "Muslims" get away with it just like they don't "Legally" have to pay stamp duty because its not "Halal" 🤔🤔🤔
The answer is simple ;
DO NOT COMPLY !
When you receive these " fines " just refuse to pay them. The system will collapse under the paperwork .
The approved emmission bands will certainly get tighter in a year or 2, excluding even more cars - till only electric cars pass - then from where will they replace this lost Fine "revenue" - same with Road Tax and duties/VAT on petrol/diesel, and eventually Resident Parking fees when no-one is left with a car, just a bike lol.
We will be left with mainly buses, tube and local trains but being a linked monopoly even their prices will soar.
This won’t happen because pay per mile road pricing is coming in the next couple of years and what they are not telling people is that it will affect every vehicle even brand new or electric you will have to pay to drive any time anywhere.....
He wants to make sure he can have the roads to himself.
They will say as its now the Mayors car, he does not have permission to drive it, also the insurance could be invalid if the insurance company finds out.
Could you register the car to someone that has recently passed. I would imagine it would be yonks until the system contacts you.
I agree , if Everyone Refuses to pay. I don’t think they would ever be able to contend with the mass Paperwork. Khan is a Normal Politician attacking those Who can Not fight Back.
Yeah f the loophole. All stand together against this crime
Sadiq Khan’s, to reduce toxic air by expanding the ULEZ to greater London will not work.
He doesn’t really care about toxic air quality and here is why:
- He has already made the toxic air far worse since he has introduced the LTN’s which have increased the toxic air on the main roads because we are forced to use them as there are no other alternatives, especially during rush hour. The roads are now grid locked with traffic moving at walking pace and the fumes are getting denser and not dispersing. LTN’s need to be reopened as it is causing more damage than good.
Among all this, the mileage in vehicles has also increased due to the fact that we are forced to go the long way round to get to the required destination - all accumulating to even more emission being emitted! Bravo Sadiq & team.
- The health for pedestrians and children as they walk along these main routes to get to stations, schools, shops is deteriorating. Even the drivers inhale more fumes when we are stuck in stationary traffic. This is really aggravating and makes no sense!
- Cycle Lanes: Should not be taking up an extra lane of the roads, large pavements could be divided into two for cyclists.
- The introductions of 20MPH roads are also a problem because emission fumes don’t disperse quickly and the air is getting even more polluted because of the need to drive in lower gears.
Sadiq’s statement: “It is to reduce toxic air pollution” is clearly not accurate and is making matters worse. The situation is getting extremely out of hand and something needs to be done to stop him from ruining our climate even more. He should resign and Londoners should vote for someone who will make London a greater and more desirable place to live in. There needs to be a more logical and strategic plan that is well thought.
Vinnie Lauda
TURN IT AROUND ON THEM! It's all based on the law of CONTRACTS. It is simply an offer & acceptance. Refusal is seen by the courts as " acceptance" by dis-honor. Therefore, NEVER REFUSE, ALWAYS submit a written COUNTER-OFFER. I would respond with a WRITTEN conditional acceptance of their offer! I would gladly comply provided the city of London and the Mayor agree to purchase a new car to replace the outdated car and I would give them 20 days to respond by mail ONLY. The Mayor's REFUSAL to respond shall be deemed the Mayor's "acknowledgment, full acceptance, and agreement "to be financially responsible to pay in full all ULEZ charges upon demand. Send the Counter offer to the Mayor by certified delivery. Keep a record of the counter-offer and the Mayor's failure to RESPOND to YOU. Address everything to the Mayor's address and use his full name! Then if the issue goes to court, show the counter-offer and Mayor's FAILURE to RESPOND to your Counter-Offer.
Thought our MOT tests check emissions then pass it ,so getting screwed again
Can anyone understand that this is the price we pay for complying. Saying no IS actually an option.
yiiisssssss please lets see this take hold & force the mayor to walk it back
Just keep taking the cameras down people
Nice work
We don't want loopholes we want it gone.
Why don’t all the surrounding councils put up cameras and charge all cars registered in London £36 to leave London.
Heathrow airport is now in ULEZ …. With jumbo jets landing and taking off overhead … more emissions than all cars in a day
All those who think they are somehow the exception to reality, should try this simple experiment: park in any garage, run your engine and see what happens. Breathing problems? Where do you think your exhaust gases go, when you drive down your street, past your kids' school, the hospital where your family member is sick, your place of work, your own house? When you sit in your own car, in the traffic? You think you and your own loved ones don't need to breathe? Cannot get cancer, asthma, heart disease, stroke? See how long you last, with the engine running in that garage, then think again.
I live in London, air no cleaner. Ltns pushed everyone on to a few main roads. Choc a block. My borough been called out, fake data
Wow that’s genius. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 The only toxic thing in London seems to be Saadiq khan 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I was told that the air was polluted in the 1950s but I have never known the air to be polluted apart from central London and that's because it's central London.
Think we might be the the laughing stock of the world with this mayor..
Most bad air in the UK was fixed by the clean air act in the 60’s
The owner is separate from the days when we used Hire Purchase agreement to buy a car.
It ensures that the car remains owned by the HP company and may be reclaimed easily instead of using courts etc.
Why not set up a car hire company based offshore if possible and register the car under the company.
You can insure an old unused vehicle perhaps a classic which enables you to drive any car NOT hired or owned by you.
That makes no sense at all, because the person using the car is the keeper, and Khan will just deny being the keeper when the logbook arrives at his office. In effect, the person that has falsified the log book details is guilty of fraudulent representation in order to commit offences, ie, ULEZ penalties, Speeding tickets, Parking Tickets, etc.
The problem with this brilliant idea is that when Khan gets the fines in the post he has all the details of the vehicle. All he has to do is report it the police as being stolen.
Identify a loophole, put it on social media, tell everyone about it so the loophole gets closed..................genius!
To my mind, Sadtwat wouldn't like the roads of HIS city clogged up for a few hours on certain days if everyone drove into London and brought the city to a standstill. Rinse and repeat until he gets the message.
Someone has already commented that the French wouldn't put up with this. Maybe we are a soft touch..??
I don't even live in London but I'm always interested in legal matters and always up to fight against the status quo
This is seriously genius.. This is the ultimate fight back.. and it will give you a free giggle 😅
I agree with Sadik on this one. People love to show their willingness to do things that promotes healthy living and caring for other people and even animals. They at least love to boast about their love for others and nature. However, that all goes out the window when they need to pay. All of a sudden children breathing in polluted air is not important. I lived in London. I can tell you that petrol fumes can be smelt in some part of London. Sadik has got this one right. And since when did he drive a 500k car. Is that even true. Seriously, a 500k car. They will happily pay lots of money on junk food and feed their children that rubbish, but 12.5 a day, if your car needs, is way too much for healthy cleaner air.
Sorry mate, I have seen Mr Khan and his minders , getting into his armour plated, bulletproof Range Rover, about four tonnes of the thing,even the wheels are bulletproof
It has a massive engine as well
He could have bought a London cab, 35K of them running around, would be a harder target to hit
Look the roads are clogged and those rich people are getting stuck in traffic jams, how dare the poor drive cars, and then complain bout taxes, wage cuts, proffetering, and energy slavery.
The people have the power if they stick together
Sadiq Khan is the new sheriff of Nottingham and the Blade Runners are Robin Hood. Loopholes are a waste of time and will get a lawyer onto you for some thing you've missed as the wealthiest person (TFL)gets the best lawyer and they win in a court room.
Having to meet Euro emission standards when we're not even in the EU! What the actual F@#k
A couple of problems to the idea.
He could automatically claim it is stolen at which you not only have no insurance, but can be arrested for vehicle theft and maybe fraud!
ULEZ !!😂😂All of that camera and payment infrastructure for rapidly diminishing 4% of vehicles? Wait for the 'Pay per mile journey tax on ALL vehicles to be announced.