High Gain Pickups: Fishman Open Core Modern vs Seymour Duncan Invader

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 чер 2024
  • #guitar #pickups #seymourduncan #fishman #shootout #headtohead #demo #highgain #metal #tone #modern #invader #charvel #squier #telecaster
    Let's look at two of the most popular pickups for high gain metal and see which one does it best! The Seymour Duncan Invader and the new Fishman Open Core Modern ceramic! How do they sound in a full mix? Isolated? What about through a real amp?
    In this video I use the new Bogren Digital MLC Subzero 100 Plugin
    bogrendigital.com/products/ml...
    and the ML Drums Essentials Pack from ML Sound Lab
    ml-sound-lab.com/pages/ml-drums
    Help out by using my affiliate links:
    www.zzounds.com/a--3989680
    0:00 Intro
    0:19 Guitar Overview
    2:29 Mix Tools
    3:33 Full Mix Fishman
    4:21 Full Mix Invader
    5:09 Mix Discussion
    6:47 Isolated Guitars
    7:32 Isolated Track Discussion
    9:23 Real Amp Clean Demo
    10:11 Real Amp High Gain Demo

КОМЕНТАРІ • 35

  • @BaritoneGoatStudio
    @BaritoneGoatStudio  6 місяців тому

    Not a wholly scientific comparison, but nonetheless it is interesting to see how similar these pickups are. I would take either in a high gain setting, but what is your preference?!

  • @michaelj.anderson1116
    @michaelj.anderson1116 6 місяців тому +2

    I like the low end of the invader and it is louder for sure. But the Fishman's have that higher midrange bite that I prefer. Both cool pickups though.

  • @mrctdd
    @mrctdd 13 днів тому

    That Fishman is mean, but oh boy Invader is a punch in your face ahah I think in the mix sat better. For cleans definitely Invader, it's pure eargasm with that low end! Great comparison man 👏

    • @BaritoneGoatStudio
      @BaritoneGoatStudio  13 днів тому +1

      Thanks! The Invader is my recommendation for anyone looking for a high gain passive pickup. Especially if they are running a single [pickup guitar and will use it for cleans too.

  • @-WolfMan-
    @-WolfMan- 4 місяці тому

    Thanks for doing this video. Always had my suspicions and you helped confirm them... now I know.

    • @-WolfMan-
      @-WolfMan- 4 місяці тому

      Used to own Invaders ... but like an idiot, I traded 'em out because I fell into the hype that if something's new ... it's got to be better.
      Man, was I wrong.

    • @-WolfMan-
      @-WolfMan- 4 місяці тому

      The Fishmans seem to have a stronger Midrange presence, while the Invaders have a much more pronounced Punch to 'em ...
      Fishman for the show off soloists
      Invaders for the Heavy handed Riffers

    • @BaritoneGoatStudio
      @BaritoneGoatStudio  4 місяці тому +1

      The invader is a bigger sound for sure! I used to think they were muddy and noisy back when I was younger, but I just didn’t know enough about setting up a guitar. Now they are one of my favorite passive pickups!

  • @angusorvid8840
    @angusorvid8840 5 місяців тому

    Both pickups are fantastic. I dig them each for what they do. But I have a special place for the Invader. I've been a fan of the Invader since I first played one in a local music shop in the 80s. I thought it was going to meltdown the amp I plugged into! What I dig about the Invader is that it's dark and has rolled off high end and a nice amount of clarity for such a high-powered monster pickup. And it's not without soul. I like the way they feel when playing. They are not stiff like cardboard or dry sounding; unlike a number of super high output ceramics I've tried. But I would say make a decision about the Modern or the Invader by trying them. I love the Invader, but I would not tell anyone to get one without trying it first unless you have a very good idea what it sounds like. Good demo.

  • @ordohereticus3427
    @ordohereticus3427 6 місяців тому

    Can’t go wrong with either one, but the Invader has a distinct sound and aggression that remains a favourite for my preference.

  • @r.eduardom-rosa6143
    @r.eduardom-rosa6143 6 місяців тому +2

    I have both, I definitely prefer the Invader, every time I hear it its like looking at my true love haha.
    I have to completly change my amp setings or run an EQ pedal when I use the fishmans and they do have more of a ( inside a ) tin can sound but I do like haveing both.

    • @BaritoneGoatStudio
      @BaritoneGoatStudio  6 місяців тому +1

      The invader is a hard to beat tone! The new Fishman open core moderns seem to be a bit better with the high end clarity. I wonder how much those open blade magnets really change the sound? I need to try and do an A/B between the regular modern ceramic and the open core!

    • @r.eduardom-rosa6143
      @r.eduardom-rosa6143 6 місяців тому

      I have not tried the open core, I have the covered but I can still hear a bit of that tin can sound in the mids on your isolated guitar tracks. Im still messing around with them to see if I can get a more rock solid feel like the Invaders. I forgot to mention incase tou were counting I own at least 6 or 7 guitars with Invaders and only one with Fishman. I continue to buy Invaders for their reliability and passiive easy of use on top of the amazing sound. There is also a huge price difference between the two PUs. While I have no plans on buying Fishmans to swap in any guitars it is not a deal breaker if I am looking to buy one, it just need a bit more attention I think. I do like to have on hand diferent PUs to change sounds and keep things fresh. In fack I might go mess around with it right now, haha.

    • @BaritoneGoatStudio
      @BaritoneGoatStudio  6 місяців тому +1

      @@r.eduardom-rosa6143 to be honest the Moderns are somewhat more compressed sounding than some of the other variants. Voice to does help give the bottom end more heft, but the mids still remain a little bit flat. Probably why they record well and mix well. When I look at the waveform, the fishmans almost have what looks like a limiter on the peaks. I wonder sometimes if the built in preamp has a hard clipping circuit built in.

    • @r.eduardom-rosa6143
      @r.eduardom-rosa6143 6 місяців тому

      Yes I agree, I do find the second mode better. I also agree very much with what you said about using the FF for recording and the Invaders for live.

  • @infamouskillas
    @infamouskillas Місяць тому

    side by side i would probably choose the invaders over the fishman's but if i picked one over the other i probably wouldn't notice or miss the differences of the latter. the invaders sound a little lower, deeper, more of a growl, with an aggressive punch type of sound. I kept saying to myself that the fishman's almost had some sort of slight tangy sound to it as i was watching your video.

  • @The_Devil_You_Know
    @The_Devil_You_Know 3 місяці тому

    Grab a 24v mod. More headroom more clarity more output and response. It made my old EMG 81/60 set sound ALOT less compressed like they way you would hope they sound. But it’s not gonna necessarily give you more gain. But more attack, better response, headroom and clarity. Works for EMGs fishmans and Blackouts. I was skeptical about it for a long time but I figured $30 bucks why not give it a shot and I’m pleasantly surprised. Threw one in my charvel also w 57/66 set and same outcome. I results may vary. The 57/66 set is much more open and organic to begin with so with those it was a bit yet apparent but it’s there. I did back to back comparisons on both on the computer and the attack and headroom were extremely apparent when A/B same riff with and without it installed on my 81/60 on my ESP.

    • @The_Devil_You_Know
      @The_Devil_You_Know 3 місяці тому

      There are a ton of fake models out there but can send the link to the real ones If you’d like

  • @ace12689
    @ace12689 3 місяці тому +1

    The fishmans definitely have more in the 2k range where as the invaders definitely have more in the higher end of the lows. However the invader is MUCH tighter

    • @BaritoneGoatStudio
      @BaritoneGoatStudio  3 місяці тому +1

      The Invader is punchy. I really used to think I didn’t like them, but in the right guitar, they are hard to beat.

    • @ace12689
      @ace12689 3 місяці тому

      @@BaritoneGoatStudio I’m actually between the invader and the bk aftermath for a warrior I just bought. And the price tag alone for the little tonal differences might just win it for the invader tbh

  • @luisbonnin2658
    @luisbonnin2658 5 місяців тому +1

    I own that same charvel and was looking to swap the open core classic for that same open core modern. How do you think the modern compares to the classic. I find the classic to be too bright in that guitar. Thanks

    • @BaritoneGoatStudio
      @BaritoneGoatStudio  5 місяців тому

      Classic voice 1 is a pretty bright sounding tone since it is trying to get that chimey PAF tone. I find the voice 2 to be more useable overall on the classics, but it still retains more of the top end sizzle. The open core modern focuses more on the high mids. Some people do say it has a fizzy top end, but I haven’t found that to be the case. The modern voices (1&2) are more meaty sounding to me. Voice 2 has a fair bit of low end and less saturation. I ended up putting an Alnico modern in the neck of this guitar.

    • @luisbonnin2658
      @luisbonnin2658 5 місяців тому

      @@BaritoneGoatStudio I appreciate the feedback, that's exactly how I would describe the classic. I did order the ceramic open core modern in red with the black blades. I think it'll look and sound better. Thanx for the info.

  • @fu46xx
    @fu46xx Місяць тому

    whats the name of the song in the 1st comparison video? i would like to learn that riff i just got the invaders!!!

    • @BaritoneGoatStudio
      @BaritoneGoatStudio  Місяць тому +1

      That is actually just an original riff. I programmed the drums and bass and recorded the tracks in my studio space. The guitars are in drop B tuning if that helps. Mostly played on frets 2-3 and 5-6.

  • @Durkhead
    @Durkhead 6 місяців тому

    Since the invader has higher output did it have less noise with the distortion? Like could you lower the noise gate

    • @BaritoneGoatStudio
      @BaritoneGoatStudio  6 місяців тому

      Not sure. I sort of set and forget my gate on most applications. I will say that even though the invader was peaking higher, sound wise it didn’t seem like there was a boost in overall gain. In fact, in the room especially, I felt like the Fishman had more saturation in the signal. The invader definitely hit harder on the chugs though. I kept settings the same between both pickups, and even though I might want to tweak them slightly, it didn’t seem like either really needed it.

  • @lfxciii
    @lfxciii 2 місяці тому

    This video made me buy an invader for my prs

  • @PressK
    @PressK 6 місяців тому

    The invader sounds dark, yet in the full mix, it kinda sat better and had just the right type of mids to sound clearer. Weird

    • @BaritoneGoatStudio
      @BaritoneGoatStudio  6 місяців тому

      I think the roll off in the highs and where the resonant peak is in the mids on the invader clash less with the ambient mic on the drums and mesh better with the upper frequencies of the distorted bass guitar track.
      It may also be that the responsiveness of the invader while playing made for a better take when I recorded those tracks. I often think pickups do more for the feel of the guitar than just the tone.

  • @paulcollins8122
    @paulcollins8122 6 місяців тому

    Sound very similar

    • @BaritoneGoatStudio
      @BaritoneGoatStudio  6 місяців тому +1

      The more I try different pickups, the more I am starting to think that it really comes down to the build quality over the actual sound. As long as they are not microphonic or falling apart, the rest seems to be pretty minimal. I will say that the clean tone test in the last half of the video show how different they can be, but once I add the gain much of that gets negated.

  • @VincentVegardSvart
    @VincentVegardSvart 2 місяці тому

    Mimimal difference. I choice Invader