Nimitz Class vs Gerald R Ford Class - How Do The Aircraft Carriers Compare?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 лип 2017
- Gerald R Ford Class is US Militaries brand new Aircraft Carrier. It will slowly replace the aging Nimitz Class. But how do the two aircraft carriers compare? Lets find out in this episode of The Infographics Show: Nimitz Class vs Gerald R Ford Class ⭐SUBSCRIBE: bit.ly/2glTFyc ⭐
MILITARY PLAYLIST -► bit.ly/MilitaryComparisons
WEBSITE (You can suggest a topic):
theinfographicsshow.com
SUPPORT US:
Patreon.......► / theinfographicsshow
CHAT:
DISCORD.....► / discord
SOCIAL:
Facebook...► / theinfographicsshow
Instagram..► / theinfographicsshow
Twitter........► / theinfoshow
Subreddit...► / theinfographicsshow
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sources for this episode:
pastebin.com/usxGD7PG
basically one is are really big boat and one is a REALLY big boat
Made of CAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASH
as for anything military
Blayne Peterson The really 🅱 I G one isn't 🅱 O N E L E S S.
Demonic Hellstorm OH 🅱️HIT
Blayne Peterson big baout vs biger boaut
how did america get so op?
stefastra 💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰
stefastra cause 'Murica, bitch.
stefastra in short: not being on the same continent as both world wars and having a geography that works very much in their favor.
So is Canada
We used cheat codes
Just realized I live like 20 minutes away from this beauty!
I just realised I live in the wrong hemisphere and a 14.5 hour flight away. 😋
I just realised I'm opposite of this beauty
@@johno9507 lol ur reply is 14 hours ago, not that long right
The Reason why the super powers needs Carriers is to deliver force beyond your borders, to ensure you always stay at the top. Also to secure that wars will never reach your homeland, keeping wars away as much as possible
Even though the Gerald R Ford is more expensive, in the long run it will be cost efficient due to easier maintenance and also there are not much crew to pay salary to
Kaze Arqaz thats the problem who will pay for these ships if theres no job?
what? it's only 800 people, just the increase in the amount of people with jobs in the US would raise taxes enough to cover those 800 "missing" people
in 1 day or less*
Geography also has something to do with it, U.S. bordered only 2 countries by land. There are advantages and disadvantages of being bordered by two oceans and only few neighboring countries. The advantages are that it helps insulated the country against large-scale invasions and provide two major trading routes. The disadvantage is that you need ships to get anywhere outside North America (it is possible to drive to South America, but it's not cost-effective).
Top speed 30 knots? My ass... That's all the Navy will admit to... They will go a helluva lot faster
What is it with Americans and bullshit? A few extra knots isn’t going to make a difference in a battle between this and the 10,000 knot ballistic missiles that will destroy it.
Bartonovich52 the reason isn’t about it outrunning a middle, it is about reaching somewhere faster, or outrunning something such as an enemy fleet...stop being so dam negative and open up ur mind a bit
i thought i saw the actual max speed was clasified
@@IronJoeHorn ur right
@@Bartonovich52 False. The most important part of any battle is to find the carrier, and if you lose contact, how far can it get before you find it again. Do the math on how much area is in a 34.5 mile radius circle versus a 36.8 mile radius circle, and keep in mind this search will be conducted while a squadron of angry Hornets is trying to splash the searcher.
(answer: 3737 sq miles vs 4252... an extra 500 square miles)
0:13 I'm pretty sure airplanes during World War 2 didn't try to land on FREAKING BATTLESHIPS!!
Well... maybe the Japanese did
That doesn't count as landing.
Catapult launched floatplanes such as OS2U Kingfisher is as close as it was in that respect.
Also, that thing looks more like Japanese cruiser, tbh.
Also this.
I kinda forgot about USS Lex/Saratoga
I dunno ... the Japanese kamikaze tried real hard!
Catpirate The yellows were just bad pilots
Sum ting wong
Wi tu lo
Ho lee fuk
Bing ding ow
U.S. Navy. Keeping the Oceans safe for trade since 1945. Great job.
Great work with the nuclear reactor.
Congratulations to whoever designed it.
Andrés The Royal Marine what happens when ship gets blown up or sunk?
Shit happens (I was actually referring to the animation but a nuclear reactor is a marvelous engineering achievement)
It will sink to the bottom of the ocean, where there is plenty of coolant to stop it from exploding. Naval reactors can shut down in any orientation.
I especially like the electricity being produced straight from the reactor. Because that's how reactors work... Right? Also I like that all of the control panels and manuevering are on the reactor compartment. I'm sure they would pass Official Reactor Safeguard Exam (ORSE)
I saw a Nimitz class In-person and i felt blessed to have seen it, the size is literally was unimaginable.
It really bothers me when I see people in the comments say, "oh, that 13 billion could have gone to the homeless".
Some starving kid in Africa could've eaten that nuclear fuel!
Why?
@@atklm1 Uranium has lots of calories
@@atklm1 ikr righ...smh
Given how much mney the US makes our homeless care is appaling
I've been on a Nimitz the Stennis it's honestly not that bad except I was sleeping about 4 feet below the rear flight deck And the arresting gear and catapult seemed extremely effective watching a massive F-18 Come to a complete stop in such a short distance is crazy
so cool love the ship. top gun maverick fetchers the f/a 18 c supper hornet and you might want to watch it
Nimitz class still home F-14 Tomcats? I could swear this bird has been retired and decommissioned.
What he means is that they were carried in the past, as with the f4 phantoms as well
do the British Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrier Vs the Nimitz class or the Gerard R Ford
HAHAHA Slider xD
Noah Bowie if i spam this will we get it?
Noah Bowie df
Charlie Haywood-Sharp we might
whats the point of comparing if you know the US one is superior
I was stationed on an aircraft carrier. The 'public' speed listed for Navy ships always seems to be about 30 knots. I won't tell you how fast it will go, but it is much faster than 30 knots. When a carrier starts going flank speed it almost looks like a tsunami is coming out of the back.
And a bow wave that almost touches the bullnose. 30 knots? Bullshit!
The USS enterprise was the first Nuke carrier ever, and when building it congress didn't like its cost, and so they sarcastically went all out and gave it 1 reactor for every boiler a standard carrier would have, 8. Now a nuke carrier only actually needs 2... so... yeah the Enterprise could literally go so fast it would fall apart, during speed tests they actually had structure issues because it was reaching 40 knots and still had a lot more to go.
Thanks for posting this video!!!
I live about 30 miles from Virginia beach and every time we go we cross a tunnel then long bridge in the water are huge warships and aircraft carries being built
Was stationed on the Nimitz for year, pretty cool video!
Great video, as usual!!! Have a nice day!!!
Landen Polly you havent watched it bitch
Fucking what?
Yes, I was waiting for this video! ~ Thanks
Great vid!!
A lot of info in a short vid!
I love the both carriers!!
Carriers too op, please nerf.
Hedgehog Fox anti ship missiles are a counter balance, so no
@@robertmcveigh1572 are we sure about that
iTS THE PRICE THAT ALSO NERFS IT
War gaming: say no more. *Releases carrier rework*
Don't nerf the carriers the world will be gone.
I was stationed on the Nimitz with RVAH-6 in 1976 and although working as a plane captain on the flight deck was dangerous and extremely laborious, I wouldn't change that experience for anything. I consider it an honor to have serve our nation on what was then the newest carrier in the fleet and is now the oldest.
Your animation got better than ever!
thanks love the vid
*USS Birmingham with the Rising Sun in the background*
Makes sense
Banzai.... Or bring the tea old chap
Steam catapult is so outdated yet Russia and China can't even have one
Difference of opinion. Not everyone designs their navy the same way.
US has supercarriers because it intends to fight battles far far away. The Russian (Chinese are way too new to the carrier game) Navy doesn't operate on the same principle. Their navy is designed to counter & deter US Navy. They win if US is unable to deploy a CBG into an area. So they went for STOVL/STOBAR ships. Cheaper and effective in the short range.
Soviet Union didn't even care for Carriers, for there principle was to fight a land war Europe and the Navy's job was deny US Navy and merchant fleet access to Europe. So submarines, frigates, missile boars & ASW ships for Soviet Navy.
US Navy had the job of fighting 1000s of miles from their home and keeping lanes clean. So Carriers , ASW helos, destroyers , & submarines for USN.
Domo N Car gets it. Russia has always been primarily a land power. Their naval power is an afterthought to help them keep the US Navy at bay.
Domo N Car Russia and China may have different navies, but their carriers are objectively inferior, this is not a matter of opinion.
The steam catapult isn't actually that outdated and Russia and China are extremely late to the carrier game so yeah
Kaze Arqaz Both China and Russia have hypersonic missiles that can sink this 13billion$ aircraft carrier..lol
Info graphic king!
your videos are so good keep up the quality
been on 1 of these monsters. my father was in the Navy. in charge of the sailors running it's reactor. these ships very humbling.
On the cost... the cost of the 'one ship' is actually the cost of a whole new CLASS, not just a new ship, never mind comparing the cost to the last ship built of the previous class.
Thats just wrong tho
@@anguswaterhouse9255 But it's totally correct though. First is always the expensive R&D and potential downgraded to 'concept'-only one.
Nice video 👍👍
The amount of varying types of aircraft we have in such large numbers is incredible
I'm looking forward to the new enterprise cvn-80 frankly, CVN65 was just decommisioned and was longer than the ford, faster (It was able to out run the escort ships) , ran on 8 reactors (though it didn't need them) and it seems to make sense to hold back on on some advancements to keep with tradition of having the most advanced toys on a recurring namesake like the enterprise.
Do Cailfornia vs Texas
I want to see the Military
Just google the population of California and compare it to Texas.
tfw New York State has greater military projection capabilities than most countries.
+Claire AwesomeSauce Actually, marijuana steadies my aim.
There's more guns and ammo in Texas than there are in the US. Also we have more tigers in captivity than there are in the rest of the world 8)
It would never happen. Californians don't believe in guns.
Nice!
Well, this video CARRIED me along, please don't kill me...
The Nimitz went way over budget as well when she was developed. The Nimitz had many major technological advancements over the Enterprise (CVN 65) and the previous class of carrier which included the Kitty Hawk and the Kennedy. (CV63 and CV67). These overruns allowed us to be able to produce a much better carrier in future models (CVN69 and up) and with each carrier built we were able to refine the design a bit more every time. I have served onboard 2 of the carriers and sailed 3 all together and there were differences in each one. All 3 were also sequential (CVN73, 74, 75) but improvements were made to each one. If I were a guessing man here I would say we are going to see a similar evolution with the Ford Class. BTW there will be at least 3 in the class as of right now. The Ford has been running sea trials, The Kennedy and Enterprise (CVN 79 and 80 respectively) have been awarded and the Kennedy is about 50% complete.
The jets are supposed to land at the back of carriers. The animation did it wrong.
Nice art work
You need to get more subs with ur amazing art
There are more than a few errors in this video. For example the USS Ford has the dual-band radar (DBR) system consisting of the X band AN/SPY-3 multifunction radar with the AN/SPY-4 S band Volume Search Radar (VSR) emitters. They are sensors not electronic warfare systems. Both the Nimitz class and the USS Ford will be equipped with AN/SLQ-32(v)4 electronic warfare system. The Nimitz Class has SPS-48E, SPS-49(V)5 and the SPQ-9B radars fused into a single picture that is integrated with the Shipboard Self Defense System and the Cooperative Engagement System.You copied from Wikipedia that the Nimitz class is armed with "16-24 RIM 7 missiles." What they actually have is three or four NATO RIM-7 Sea Sparrow missile launchers each carrying 8 missiles. The Ford carries initially 2 x RIM-162 ESSM launchers (Mk 29 launcher), 2 x RIM-116 RAM launchers (Mk 144 launcher 42 missiles) & 2 x PHALANX 20mm Close In Weapon Systems (CIWS) (not four). The Ford one day may have laser defensive weapons as may the Nimitz's. Some of the Nimitz Class ships have the Surface Ship Torpedo Defense System (SSTDS) as presumably does the Ford. Both ships have various thickness the high-strength low-alloy steel (HSLA-100) amour and some Nimitz has additional Kevlar as does the Ford.The Ford and Nimitz Class will essentially carry the same type aircraft at the same time. The Nimitz quoted rate is one aircraft launched every 20 seconds,. The Ford is said to be able to launch aircraft faster and for a more sustained time.The French only have one aircraft carrier and it does indeed have steam catapults. You'd think you'd show some pictures of the other aircraft carriers as you discussed them. The Russians do have a super carrier as do the Chinese (an old converted Russian carrier).This video reminds me of someone that read the Wikipedia article and nothing more.
I have no idea what any of that means. 'MERICA!
Ah just a few ...................its a bit lite on actual facts and brushes over more than a few historical facts
Your comment is better then the video
thank you. Your comment had better info than his entire poorly researched video.
Its three Phalanx ciws
USS Gerald R. Ford was commissioned 10 days after this video lol XD
@SCP 682 it means these videos are uploaded at the very right moment when the news is HOT
That got the EM launch idea from roller coasters
which program do you use to do this cool animations?
Laser point defense systems, Macross style!
In all seriousness, powerful lasers are simply too potentially effective for line of sight anti-projectile defense compared to everything else.
MAKE DASSAULT RAFALE VS EUROFIGHTER TYPHOON!!!!!!!!!
YESSS WERE ALL WAITING!!!!
I am French and your xenophobia makes me want to retch
Dude , french pilots are among the best in the world 😂
They're just mad the Rafale is much better than the Typhoon lol
I laught 😂 thanks dude :) seriously , the RAF's pilots doesn't have the experience of the battlefield and i can't judge for the israeli pilots , i have never heard about this guys ( no joke)
How does this Chanel not have 1 mil subs
2:56-there is Vertical launch system for the Sea Sparrow. Has there been any decision to use it instead of the Mk29s?
3:44-could the EMALS be installed on Nimitz-class ships in place of the steam catapults?
Less people on board, more computer power?
When the Cylons attack you're fucked!
That is what the nuclear submarines are for.
Haha! I thought that too.
The Ford class will be supreme and unmatched.
1. Literal cheating assuming the US Navy would allow a "cruise ship" to sail through an exclusion zone, much less within eight miles of a carrier during an active war.
2. Accurate. Unless the entire strike group is consistently banging active radar, modern Diesel-Electric submarines can effectively move undetected through CSG's without submarine escorts.
3. Presumably ditto, but relatively few details were released as to why the CSG's ASW exercises didn't work.
4. I can only find one and most accept the idea was to deny the soviets proper understanding of American ASW protocol, and thus force the Soviets to adopt incorrect submarine doctrines that would better protect CSG's during wartime.
5. This one is total bullshit that gets cited way more often than it should. Gen. Riper didn't use unorthodox tactics to win in Millennium Challenge 02, he outright cheated; doing crazy shit like *firing more exocets than existed at the time* to down vessels in the opening brawl, or not using radio communications at all because he can totally communicate with his hundred vessel combat group using flashing light morse code messages and motorcycle deliverymen alone.
Then it hit an iceberg
we are discussing about supercarriers when in a few years we can launch a nuclear warhead using a railgun at mach 5 speed with unmatched precision and sink theese ships from land. also only high altitude stealth bombers will be useful against a real war with a superpower. in wartime we will probably have also a "orbital space war" where every nation tries to destroy the comm-sat of their enemies. orbital weapons will also be developed in no time.
Valentin Galvan once they work the bugs out. Any new system this complex always, ALWAYS has bugs
I found it funny when he trie d to insinuate that the Chinese are developing supercarriers, when their only "aircraft carrier" is something they jerry rigged out of an out of date Soviet ship they bought for scrap metal. The Nimitz was the best in the world from the 70's until now and the Us is already building something much bigger and better, while the Chinese are using something they get third hand from the Ukraine, who got it from the USSR.
The whole concept of a sailing airport is fascinating
A little correction, France has one carrier left (Charles de Gaulle), at the time of the video Brazil had an old french carrier in service, but decommissioned it in 2017.
" somewhat more powerful "... " 3 times the amount "... Last I checked, 3 times the amount is SIGNIFICANTLY more!!!
Your typical american citizen: "Yeah, I think an aircraft carrier is what we were missing all along,"
One of the biggest benefits to the automated features is that the Ford class can launch and maintain far more aircraft in flight, with less crew, because they can arm them much faster. Given how carriers fight, this is a huge benefit--having planes in the sky is essential for defense against the biggest threats currently to carriers (Missiles and Subs)--as planes allow for better coordination with escort ships.
Where did you get your information for the speed ratings? Aren't those highly classified?
France has only one aircraft carrier
Whatever is your opinion in US's warmongering, you can not deny, that this is one of the most beautiful machines ever made.
Nub93+ Why the hell does the USA have to feed the world? We don't owe Africa shit. Hell we already send them aid, but that isn't good enough?
Nub93 not our country which means its not our problem.
Nub93
What complete bullshit.
All Western countries already spend vast ammounts of resources to improve the situation in African countries.
More money doesn't help, but makes the problems worse.
There is more than enough resources in Africa. The problem is corruption and superstition.
US warmongering?!
Nub93 Have you spent any time feeding the poor anywhere?
please can you do a queen Elizabeth class carrier vs the Gerald r ford class (to see take off speed, crew size ect...)
SLQ-32 is designed to detect RADAR, but is not an active radar system itself. According to wikipedia the CVN-68 class has SPS-48E, SPS-49, SPQ-9B, SPN-43C, and SPN-41 radars.
Gerald R Ford is getting Commissioned next week. Look it up
nice so they are getting Railguns as well. :)
Each carrier is like a small city. They are so beautiful. I fell in love with navy warships when my family went to the USS Alabama in Mobile, AL. A beautiful ship and also got to see the USS Drum. Since then I’ve been to as many ships as possible. I want to tour a modern nuclear submarine. I’ve been in a Los Angles class sub and a Seawolf. I would like to tour an Ohio class sub, but they aren’t very keen on letting people on those.
USS America vs HMS Queen Elisabeth, also Iowa class battle ship vs Yamtao class battleship, and Ticondiroga class cruiser vs Kirov-class battlecuriser those three would be awesome:)
I was stationed on the Nimitz. That thing has a very busy workspace. Living with an airport a few decks above your head made it a little hard to sleep at times. And yes it was crowded. We spent most of the year out to sea and worked 12 hr days 7 days a week while out to sea. Lots of drills. The food out at sea was very good though. Lots of steaks and shrimp and the like. You could even have chow at night. The biggest issue I had a problem with was the racism that was rampant onboard. Lots of gang activity too. I hope that's not the way things are now.
Racism?
nato vs yugoslavia 1999 army comparasion
pls
Kingdom of Montenegro how about the Yamaoto?
or Vietnam against the United States
Kingdom of Montenegro Vatican City vs. US army comparison.
There was no Yugoslavia in 1999. It ended in 1991.
Make a video about that old German ship, the Bismarck!
My dad was stationed on the CVN-65. Im here to see how replacement class differs. I wonder if the Ford class still has the R2D2/Phallanx gun? Oh it does. Are they the same old design?
Please do NATO vs Warsaw Pact 1989
105 031 binkovs battlegrounds already did that, check out his channel
Warsaw pact is dead
Germany in WWI vs Germany in WWII
Hue Gass LMAO!
Germany will win
What I genuinely want to know is where I can get the background theme at
btw all of the planes mentioned can be carried by both, although F4s and F14s are retired. The F35c is almost finished developing , it just still needs more testing on the landing gear for on the carriers.
USA vs. The world
Logan Fun usa win
Well a video aboit it came OUT
Boeing vs airbus
The Ford Class is an awesome ship, and will likely go on to be the ultimate in Carrier technology.
But I did have a few small issues with the Video.
1) The Queen Elizabeth Class have been designed to accept a catapult Launch system, which may be deployed on the ship (or both) at a later date. But given the fact both vessels were designed specifically for STOL operations, more specifically the F35B a catapult system was deemed not currently worthwhile. The Capability was designed into the ship however.
2) While the F35 is a predominantly US led development it is not entirely US designed. The UK is a major contributer in Tech and design personell to the aircraft. I know for a fact that many aspects of the aircrafts electronics and life support systems were taken from developments pioneered during the Eurofighter programme... how do I know this? My brother was one of the lead engineers on Eurofighter and has been working on F35 for years... and no, I do not know specifics, little thing called the Official Secrets act. This is not to say the UK is *the* major contributor, it is not, but it *has* made several valid and valuable contributions to the programme. Current estimation is that around 15% of every F35 is British designed.... not a lot admittedly, but designing and building 5th Generation aircraft is not a cheap thing, and hell, given the US's tech lead 15% is a pretty good ratio.
3) One Gerald D Ford Class has thus far cost more than both the development and the Hull and Equipment cost of the Queen Elizabeth Class, with plenty of change, hell one Ford is going to cost more than both QE class [lus their Air Wings! Probably not an issue for the US Navy... but definately one for the Royal Navy :)
4) 4300 crew? Pah... Queen Elizabeth has a sailing crew of 700.... Air crew and the like will add more but from the figures less than a thousand. But then the Royal Navy dont have the numbers of the USN! That is one *highly* automated ship. Worries me actually, because low crew numbers are great in peace time but I do wonder if the damage control and the like will be adequate in war time.... only time will tell (though hopefully not!).
The TL;DR version is really, dont try to compare US Carriers with anyone elses, because no one else can *afford* US style Super Carriers! Despite being a proud Brit I know the Queen Elizabeth will not be as effective a platform as a Nimitz, let alone the GDF.... but she will be (for the moment) better than anyone elses *except* the US!
We F-ing got 19 carriers?!
F-ing COOL!
I'm a Nimitz class sailor... USA GEORGE WASHINGTON CVN 73
Thank you for your service JERZBOY 1982
is your ship falling apart as bad as we are on the 68
ryanair v easyjet
What i want to know is, is the computer automated system centralized or is it like a mesh network?
Fun fact there be more careful because anytime you open up a nimitz-class carrier the do any sort of major maintenance like pulling out reactors and what not they're continually finding workshops and spaces that there is no access to
America 2 op plz nerf
A Fucking Human Being no
Russia and China too OP America need buff
@@jaws1698 lol no Russia is weaker than the Soviet Union
@@meltedicecreamsandwich yeah but Russia and China together would destroy the US
@@jaws1698 I'd say it's a 50/50 imo
I bet thw Gerald R Ford class will have a uss Barrack Obama lol
like the Barack Obama carrier in Black Ops 2
AR Gaming & More! Exactly
favreu fadel putra ramaditya Carriers are named after important individuals in the US Navy and past Presidents. The person needs to be dead however.
Marc Lowenthal well heorge hw is still alive
Marc Lowenthal but hes old i think that's count
Please do a video on the HMS Queen Elizabeth class carriers
How about predictions for the top 10 militaries?
The US does not have 19 carriers. Including the Ford there are 11.
No, amphibious assault ships are not aircraft carriers. Their aircraft only support ground troops. Aircraft on carriers also engage in air superiority, deep strike, ASW and command & control.
If you want to argue that LHDs like the USS Wasp are carriers, then nearly every ship in the Navy is a carrier. Nearly all could have an F-35b or an AV-8 stationed on them.
tb fair, 'MURICA class amphibious ships are about the size, and can carry as much planes as other countries actual carriers.
Ростислав Несисюк They carry 6 attack aircraft, 4 attack helicopters, 3 drone attack helicopters, 12 V-22 transports, 7 other helicopters. If you remove all the other aircraft and just go with F-35s or AV-8Bs, they can carry 20.
They need the size (40k tons) to carry over 1800 Marines, a full regiment, plus all their gear and landing craft.
it still carriers
GoatSuit wtf?
Technically true. They are carriers. They launch planes. They are not sea tenders. They are bigger than some countries actually Aircraft Carriers. And their air complement is nothing to scoff at (and better than one AC).
Seriously, their current air complement is more potent than US fleet carriers in WW2 (not jeep carriers, but actual fleet carriers) and are about the same size.
Any other country will call it an Aircaft Carrier.
Did you guys know when the Russian air craft carrier were send to kill isis it nedded repair in france and need to be Towed by boats 😂😂😂😂
Luka Skytte talk about zumwalt 🙄
HITESH Adhikari But the zumwalt is way better than a rusty old ship am I right?
HITESH Adhikari what about it? Nothing has happened to it that is beyond normal operation damage. Most ships do receive expected damage whenever they're first launched
It was to support Syria, not to fight ISIS. sooo no
Luka Skytte it's still better then what happened to their Baltic fleet during the russo-japanese war.
with the increase in power specifically 3x more power than the Nimitz class, it will be able to accommodate laser defense weapon platform
The animation for nuclear power was pretty cool
USA is always '' The best '' in terms of military . USA USA USA USA
Jon Baldwin and '' Not even close'' in terms of health care😂
Hyperion so true 😂😂
Hyperion That's fair...
Yeah okay, the US is basically behaving how Europe did 100-200 years ago.
Don't worry, in a few centuries you'll manage to put the wellbeing of your people before the subjugation of others :)
Hyperion I mean he said military, but ya know, mkay den
The video ends one second before 7:15
You mean after?
Usually, I can tell the different classes by the deck layout
i subbed :)
United States defeats both
thegreatcalvinio they’re both US carriers LOL
Anyone else reminded of the Japan flag at 00:04
The rising star
Or sun
gr8 , travelling millittary bases
Do the DDG-1000 (Zumwalt) vs Arleigh-Burke class destroyer.
629th.
Hmm?
you're a disgrace
Neinnnnnnn
Funny thing is 'Tax payers will save money because of new carrier' ;)
the maintenance will be lower and will be more efficient in the long run for the next 40 years
Might be, considering next biggest country have only 2 carriers, Y they need 20 carrier?
Jithin Jose power
The US have 10 carriers, 1 in scrap, 1 in planning to serve, 1 in production and 1 to be planned to be produced
the rest 9 "carriers" are LHDs or LHAs which are different.
I was thinking about it 5 yrs ago when are they going to install a magnetic catapult lunch system, was thinking in how much better than a steam catapult luncher system
Just an update to the stated 2019 service date, the USS Ford was commissioned on 22 July and is now in full active service.