Smallest Aircraft Carrier In The World: HTMS Chakri Naruebet

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 вер 2024
  • Download World of Warships for FREE and unlock your starter pack here: bit.ly/2PfXF2a. Thanks to our sponsor World of Warships, new players can register with the code PLAYWARSHIPS2018 to receive 250 dubloons, 1,000,000 credits, HMS Campbeltown premium ship, one port slot and 3 days premium time!
    An aircraft carrier is typically the heart of any modern naval fleet. Though the world is most familiar with American-style supercarriers, there are in fact a variety of aircraft carriers with varying missions in service around the world. Today we’ll look at the tiniest, in this episode of The Infographics Show- The World’s Smallest Aircraft Carrier, the Chakri Naruebet.
    SUBSCRIBE TO US -► bit.ly/TheInfog...
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    WEBSITE (SUGGEST A TOPIC):
    theinfographics...
    SUPPORT US:
    Patreon.......► / theinfographicsshow
    SOCIAL:
    Twitter........► / theinfoshow
    Subreddit...► / theinfographicsshow
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Sources for this episode:
    pastebin.com/D...
    #ad #aircraftcarrier

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,3 тис.

  • @TheInfographicsShow
    @TheInfographicsShow  5 років тому +102

    After watching this video and our video about supercarriers (ua-cam.com/video/6Rf-y5d_tlo/v-deo.html) - which is your carrier of choice?

    • @fredricknietzsche7316
      @fredricknietzsche7316 5 років тому +1

      the US spends too much on defense and too much per plane for carriers, would be better off with 15 new smaller carriers then "10" minus of the over budget "ford" class.

    • @EpicThe112
      @EpicThe112 5 років тому +1

      The light one then carry it with F-35B stealth jets this is what the Japanese did to their Izumo class possibly the South Korean Dokdo

    • @Nooriman-mg7yw
      @Nooriman-mg7yw 5 років тому

      @@EpicThe112 isn't Japan prohibited from making aircraft carriers?

    • @zking5427
      @zking5427 5 років тому +1

      You should make a video about project habakuk. I don't know if I'm spelling it correctly. The facts on that "ship" will blow your mind

    • @elsauce4873
      @elsauce4873 5 років тому

      If it comes down to which is best, I would go with the Ford-class. But lets say, if I was leading a military, I would go with the Queen Elizabeth (when its fully equipped).

  • @ruampolphaobanchong6139
    @ruampolphaobanchong6139 6 років тому +990

    I'm From Thailand.
    and had a couple of Field trips on her (The HTMS Chakri Naruebet).
    Yes she is very small and outdated.
    And even though she is the only Aircraft carrier we have, But we're very proud of her.
    She is the best in Disaster relieve mission. (And that's what she can only do T_T.)

    • @XanderWang
      @XanderWang 6 років тому +20

      Ruampol Phaobanchong *proud

    • @ruampolphaobanchong6139
      @ruampolphaobanchong6139 6 років тому +35

      Oh my mistake.
      Thank you for correction.

    • @DarkZerol
      @DarkZerol 6 років тому +18

      Our Chinese Liaoning carrier will sink your toy carrier in less than 5 seconds.

    • @somethingsomethingname25
      @somethingsomethingname25 6 років тому +154

      @@DarkZerol even one us navy destroyer can sink your weak carrier

    • @XanderWang
      @XanderWang 6 років тому +3

      Ruampol Phaobanchong ไม่เป็นไรครับ

  • @patrickmcleod111
    @patrickmcleod111 5 років тому +696

    That's still pretty impressive that Thailand has an aircraft carrier. Not many countries have them.....

    • @jesusramirezromo2037
      @jesusramirezromo2037 4 роки тому +22

      @ Those are rich nations....
      Plus SouthKorea and Japan do needed them, in case of NorthKoren agression

    • @voravutsupitak96
      @voravutsupitak96 4 роки тому +3

      :)

    • @DBT1007
      @DBT1007 4 роки тому +11

      @ Japan don't have carrier after WW2. Allies especially US put a heavy restrictions to Germany n Japan. They can't advance like they used to. Now they just advance not in their 100% power

    • @DBT1007
      @DBT1007 4 роки тому +5

      @@jesusramirezromo2037 no they don't need. Seems like you and that guy don't know things about military...
      Soo better just stay quiet, please..

    • @coolkidsantino6120
      @coolkidsantino6120 4 роки тому +3

      Philippines no carrier

  • @avragetrinidadian3787
    @avragetrinidadian3787 6 років тому +1315

    The Thai-tanic

  • @ijsmikasa703
    @ijsmikasa703 6 років тому +58

    As Half Russian Thai I would say something... She is the only one Carrier that the entire South East Asia Navy ever had... XDD

  • @danielfronc4304
    @danielfronc4304 6 років тому +96

    What ship to select and how to design her is mission oriented. For Thailand's needs this sounds like a great ship, especially for the money. It's not a world beater and not meant to be. It serves as a rescue, relief and coastal defense platform. As the son of the man who designed (in the larger sense) and signed off on ships of offensive and defensive capability and all their different weapons and radar systems up until the Aegis cruisers for the U.S. Navy I think this little wonder is perfect for the Thai.

    • @animeshdas9842
      @animeshdas9842 6 років тому +6

      Daniel Fronc My father was a smart man, that makes my opinion valuable :D

    • @danielfronc4304
      @danielfronc4304 6 років тому

      Animesh Das What opinion are you referring to as it's not posted. Where can I find it?

    • @animeshdas9842
      @animeshdas9842 6 років тому

      Daniel Fronc I was referring to you sarcastically :D your comment basically says "my opinion matters because my father worked on ships"

    • @rd7068
      @rd7068 5 років тому +2

      Daniel Fronc u actually wanted to gloat about your father. Didn’t you ?

    • @camrenwick
      @camrenwick 5 років тому

      Well said

  • @ThisDangOriginalDude1944
    @ThisDangOriginalDude1944 4 роки тому +222

    "Nimitz-class Carrier the most recognisable Carrier"
    *Sad Enterprise noises*

  • @michasawczuk9747
    @michasawczuk9747 4 роки тому +83

    "Can we have aircraft carrier?"
    Mom: "No, we have aircraft carrier at home"
    Aircraft carrier at home:

  • @sirinatliansiri1889
    @sirinatliansiri1889 2 роки тому +8

    HTMS Chakri Naruebet was not a ship to honor the royal family, but was a ship approved when the royal family was in power to manage Thailand at that time. But the name Chakri Naruebet was taken from the word Chakri, which is the name of the current royal family of Thailand. At that time, the Prime Minister but named Chakri Naruebet according to the wishes of King Bhumibol Adulyadej which is the most loved by Thai people

  • @Kaziklu
    @Kaziklu 6 років тому +57

    you realize carriers don't go to sea alone right? I mean you understand that a Carrier is a fleet ship. Thailand also isn't a blue water navy as such isn't a ship designed to operate like an American Carrier.
    So such a carrier is for regional use. Would normally travel in a small fleet that includes extra offensive and defensive capabilities.

  • @dang25272549
    @dang25272549 4 роки тому +15

    Even though she couldn't match with any superpower carriers but she've been serving our nation's mission so well and yes.... we proud of her .

  • @aaronaceflorida813
    @aaronaceflorida813 4 роки тому +28

    Having an aircraft carrier is still considered a privilege beee proud of ittt not many countries have one

  • @kingsofserbiangameplay1623
    @kingsofserbiangameplay1623 6 років тому +233

    It's cute and tiny.
    -said the US admiral.

  • @jeck1337
    @jeck1337 6 років тому +173

    Actually, the Harriers have been retired since 2006, with it only using helicopters now. It even says so on the Wikipedia page. You guys are also pronouncing the name wrong. The main use of the carrier was for disaster relief, with it also being used in joint military exercises and as a show of force against Cambodia that one time. The ship was purchased after a Typhoon hit Thailand, and that was when the military realised that their rescue ships are not up for the task of rescuing people. The royal family barely uses it.

    • @jamesrawlings4471
      @jamesrawlings4471 6 років тому +12

      J4CK_ I think this channel has been going down hill for quite some time

    • @spicymemesauce8587
      @spicymemesauce8587 6 років тому +1

      J4Ck its ok if your jealous that America is better and you guys aren't

    • @annihilator4291
      @annihilator4291 6 років тому +11

      Yeah we retired Harrier since 2006 cuz there is no spare parts left to use. And Chakri Naruebet is in fact a helicopter carrier right when it was built. Harriers are just an optional feature.

    • @silp5283
      @silp5283 6 років тому +4

      Watermelon Gaming It’s not like every country can afford the ship just to be an oil stealing tyrant.

    • @spicymemesauce8587
      @spicymemesauce8587 6 років тому +3

      Slip your just salty because were better and if they want a ship then they should work hard like us

  • @mariosantisoferreiros2238
    @mariosantisoferreiros2238 6 років тому +28

    Got to see the whole construction of the ship, live in Ferrol, Spain. And the shipyard is not called Bazan since 30 years ago, now its Navantia

  • @herculanoguimaraes4605
    @herculanoguimaraes4605 6 років тому +319

    i would like to have a yacht with missiles and fighter jets

    • @rvd_ido9913
      @rvd_ido9913 6 років тому +15

      Gta much eh?

    • @sandman.38
      @sandman.38 6 років тому

      RVD_IDO LOL

    • @spicymemesauce8587
      @spicymemesauce8587 6 років тому +3

      herculano guimarães ummmm but its thailand they dont have good missiles and also there fighter jets are old and rusty the U.S. will always be better

    • @workhardism
      @workhardism 5 років тому +4

      I'll gladly take the missiles and fighter jets. Having a yacht would be a nice plus, tho.

    • @tetrodot5277
      @tetrodot5277 5 років тому

      Mark vi is for you

  • @khailhereforya
    @khailhereforya 3 роки тому +6

    Im so happy for thailand cuz they got the first aircraft carrier in south east asian congrats thailand from brother Philippines

  • @ajarofpickles2826
    @ajarofpickles2826 6 років тому +569

    Is so tiny! Also it’s not the smallest I have a mini aircraft carrier in my closet on the shelf in a glass box nice try infographic!

    • @gappia940
      @gappia940 6 років тому +7

      A jar of pickles funny

    • @soil5942
      @soil5942 6 років тому +12

      i think they mean functional aircraft carriers, but i have seen a remote control one that links up with a drone.

    • @human_bing
      @human_bing 6 років тому +6

      @@soil5942 r/woosh

    • @naughtyUphillboy
      @naughtyUphillboy 6 років тому +2

      Comment section is meant for people like you........

    • @nepnep7454
      @nepnep7454 6 років тому

      wooosh, my friend, wooosh.

  • @ijsmikasa703
    @ijsmikasa703 6 років тому +8

    She was actually build as a friendship Poposal of Spanish House of Bourbon and Thai House of Chakri... and to Celebrate The Aniversary of King Bhumipol on his 50th year reign This ship is actually more expensive than What you see in Wikipedia... (Sorry for my bad english.. I'm half Thai Russian boy, and english isn't my native language)

  • @WSB1469
    @WSB1469 6 років тому +15

    It’s a good stepping stone to larger designs. The real value however is being able to train new aircrews, pilots, & sailors, it takes years of training to effectively conduct carrier operations. Also, having been on Aircraft Carriers I can tell you it’s one of the most stressful & dangerous jobs out there.

    • @sesetio338
      @sesetio338 2 роки тому

      Were you a Mechanic onboard?

    • @sergeantblue6115
      @sergeantblue6115 2 роки тому +2

      @@sesetio338 i had a temporary position there as flight deck crew so yes its stressful

  • @sontaya7772
    @sontaya7772 6 років тому +28

    I've been on the carrier once, it wasn't the biggest but still big.

    • @Nonamelol.
      @Nonamelol. 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah obviously, it’s a carrier.

  • @Bra-a-ains
    @Bra-a-ains 6 років тому +51

    HMS Argus:
    Length: 565 feet
    Beam: 68 feet
    USS Langley:
    Length: 542 feet
    Beam: 65 feet
    Bearn (France):
    Length: 599 feet
    Beam: 115 feet
    IJN Hosho:
    Length: 168 feet
    Beam: 59 feet
    130 Allied Escort Carriers:
    Length: 500 feet
    The Thai CV is the big fish in a little pond: The Gulf of Thailand. It doesn't have to rule the world, just The Gulf of Thailand. And, the only two other countries are Cambodia and Vietnam. Think of it like a Coast Guard ship in the USA. Its job is search and rescue, anti-terrorism, anti-smuggling (drugs), and anti-piracy.

    • @Gillan1220
      @Gillan1220 5 років тому +13

      Michael Sanches Agreed. Thailand does not need power projection as the United States does. It does not have much threats to contain.

    • @patthonsirilim5739
      @patthonsirilim5739 5 років тому +5

      @@Gillan1220 correct thai navy just have to be strong enough to defend against countries around sout east asia even if thailand spend more on its military it wouldent really matter if nation like the us china or russia decide to attack her

    • @yelocalwierdo2440
      @yelocalwierdo2440 5 років тому +2

      Its an esxorr carrier. Designed to hide amongst a group of convoys with destroyers to hold of surfave raiders

  • @CuriosityCulture
    @CuriosityCulture 6 років тому +258

    It's kind of mind blowing how a nuclear powered ship only needs refueling every 20 years.... WHAT?!

    • @neeneko
      @neeneko 6 років тому +79

      Yeah, but refueling takes about 3 years.

    • @realdanksta2237
      @realdanksta2237 6 років тому +31

      Murican tech

    • @lordgrey3749
      @lordgrey3749 6 років тому +28

      Danklord 69 not really the first to do it was the soviets

    • @wick7179
      @wick7179 6 років тому +45

      The United States has since then far surpassed any other nation in terms of naval capabilities in general, I'd assume that's what he meant. Because the first nuclear powered ship was a Soviet icebreaker or something I believe.

    • @DarkZerol
      @DarkZerol 6 років тому +38

      What's so surprising? Nuclear energy is actually considered one of the most efficient and abundant sources of modern energy on Earth. It's the reason why so many developed nation use them especially Japan. Huge source of energy in a small package.

  • @theweebperson7531
    @theweebperson7531 4 роки тому +3

    yostar: take notes fast that aircraft carrier can be a LOLI!

  • @arminarlert001
    @arminarlert001 2 роки тому +3

    Thailand : I have aircraft carrier it's the biggest in South East Asia.
    USA : I have aircraft carrier that biggest in the world.

  • @rorodollars
    @rorodollars 5 років тому +41

    When you realize the amount of money the USA spends to stay ahead of everyone

  • @watermirror
    @watermirror 4 роки тому +3

    Well, Thailand or any SEA nation doesn't need an AC that can sink modern AC anyway, except for purposes of humanitarian, offshore patrol, combat support, ...

  • @thailandball6584
    @thailandball6584 6 років тому +37

    Her main purpose isn't to carry the Royal family or defend the coast of Thailand, but her main purpose is to conduct rescue and other humanitarian aid around the country and probably help other countries as well. So, we would probably bought a new ship if we have threat coming to Thailand,un like US,China,UK,Russia,Japan,Korea etc. That needs a large and advance carrier to protect and attack. Hell, even when the Thai government bought subs from China the people of Thailand strongly disagree with the idea of that. I understand that some of the information you find might be inaccurate.

    • @Predator42ID
      @Predator42ID 6 років тому +5

      Humanitarian aid would be better suited for a hospital ship not a warship and prestige is fairly common since back in the day any nation that could did build Battleships for just that reason. Not trying to insult you but isn't every nation around China gearing up for war against china a Carrier no matter the size can still be useful

    • @annihilator4291
      @annihilator4291 6 років тому +3

      seth Thomas but those ship can’t endure the high sea state like the Chakri Naruebet do.

    • @nipitponk
      @nipitponk 5 років тому +1

      Highly agreed, the information in this video is inaccurate about being use to carry Royal family, it is an armed floating hospital and rescue ship not a yatch

    • @firstletterofthealphabet7308
      @firstletterofthealphabet7308 5 років тому

      Buuuuut
      She never did

    • @thaktheinuwu2256
      @thaktheinuwu2256 5 років тому

      @@firstletterofthealphabet7308 She has done​ so​oo many rescue mission.

  • @rinsedpie
    @rinsedpie 3 роки тому +2

    With a crazy king, you can get anything!

  • @ohmmy999
    @ohmmy999 6 років тому +5

    I'm Thai myself and your pronunciation of the ships name hit me hard.

  • @9sore
    @9sore 4 роки тому +9

    i bet that this ship still gives their people pride and that’s all that matters

    • @kafirmohallida8486
      @kafirmohallida8486 4 роки тому +4

      Exchance stupidity for pride. The ship only used to evacuate people from natural disasters

  • @thenoblegerman2637
    @thenoblegerman2637 6 років тому +7

    This is pretty much a modern CVL (Light Carrier), it’s smaller than Bismarck.

  • @sebastianpatrickkrzyczewsk2261
    @sebastianpatrickkrzyczewsk2261 6 років тому +2

    The harriers have been out of service in the Thai navy for over 10 years

  • @moaitheshooter6822
    @moaitheshooter6822 5 років тому +11

    I an also from thailand buy our aircraft carrier is out dated but at least we can still carry aircraft

  • @cantrell0817
    @cantrell0817 6 років тому +4

    It's a helicopter carrier. It would be useful in low intensity conflicts or counterinsurgency operations, as well as humanitarian missions. And, yes, the prestige and status is meaningful too.

  • @AJ-jc4hd
    @AJ-jc4hd 6 років тому +37

    1:08 is when the video stars, the parts before that is a ad

    • @wans5885
      @wans5885 4 роки тому

      It's okay, World of Warship is actually awesome.

  • @saritpornlounkaew1179
    @saritpornlounkaew1179 6 років тому +177

    1 mistake:Its name is pronounced"Chac cree naru bhet".I have a friend from thailand,thats how I know.

    • @XanderWang
      @XanderWang 6 років тому +15

      Her name is Chakri narubet [chak-kri-na-ruh-beth]

    • @COJ.Island
      @COJ.Island 6 років тому

      👌😎

    • @siwakornw.8312
      @siwakornw.8312 6 років тому +6

      Agree I am Thai and people called like that

    • @XanderWang
      @XanderWang 6 років тому

      Siwakorn Wisawakornwisit ก็นั่นแหละครับ

    • @1UpTHAI-PLEASE-SUBSCRIBE
      @1UpTHAI-PLEASE-SUBSCRIBE 6 років тому +1

      You are correct
      P.S. I’m Thai

  • @loliconmaster7818
    @loliconmaster7818 6 років тому +86

    This video has a very little detail it's not useless since it help ALOT of ppl from the flood storm many etc many times. and she has been recently upgraded her comand and control with SAAB. Her main task is command center and we have a bunch of frigates protecting her too she is not ALONE when she fight. And Consider that my country(Thailand) is not that rich like the US. Now she's only carrying the helicopter just like the origin when she was first designed to do just like her name CVH911 and we retired the harrier because lacking of parts not money. Oh also the mistral on the ship is not that bad it perform very well on the cobra gold traing with the us.

    • @cianbuckley8918
      @cianbuckley8918 6 років тому +4

      Cool, Make a blog about it

    • @DarkZerol
      @DarkZerol 6 років тому +1

      Our Chinese Liaoning carrier will sink your toy carrier in less than 5 seconds.

    • @kutter_ttl6786
      @kutter_ttl6786 6 років тому +20

      @@DarkZerol we all know the reason DarkZerol is picking on Thailand because we all know Chinese carriers couldn't go head to head with any other Carrier force, amaright?

    • @classifiedad1
      @classifiedad1 6 років тому +6

      Tbh, it isn’t much of an aircraft carrier.
      However, it is a much better aircraft carrier than anyone else’s in the region.
      Which to say the least, is none.

    • @mryea6954
      @mryea6954 6 років тому +12

      @@DarkZerol
      Chinese or Thai, Western or Black it doesn't matter as we should all be peaceful, you should stick your pride up your ass and get out of your room to make some friends.

  • @guskrough9056
    @guskrough9056 6 років тому +3

    I actually toured this ship a couple years ago. Most certainly not the biggest, but its still awe-inspiring-ly large

  • @ervinmecaydor6004
    @ervinmecaydor6004 6 років тому +2

    this carrier is so cute..

  • @maclennanld
    @maclennanld 6 років тому +4

    Well it does not stack up well against super carriers but compared to Thailand's neighbors it would compare more favorably so I think it has a strategic purpose.

  • @alganhar1
    @alganhar1 6 років тому +1

    Blech, I hate the 'nuclear ships range is effectively unlimited' hyperbole, because that is what it is. A Nuclear powered ships range is NOT in fact unlimited. Some things to consider:
    1) Normal Maintenance: Nuclear powered vessels require about 30 - 40% more maintenance on top of Diesel or gas turbine vessels. Not only that but because of the specialist nature of that maintenance it is more expensive. As a result Nuclear powered vessels HAVE to spend more time tied up undergoing normal maintenance. This maintenance HAS to be done, the least thing you want is for your ships reactor to start running away on you because you have not adequately maintained it. Very good way to lose the ship and potentially its entire crew.
    2) Nuclear carriers DO in fact require fuel: The ships themselves may only require refueling every 2 decades, but their AIRCRAFT need something other than Unicorn farts and Angels tears in order to take to the skies. As a result the ship still has to take aboard fuel. The same goes for supplies, and I mean everything, from replenishing ammunition to food for the crew. It all still needs to be supplied to the ship. Now while the USN is very good at underway replenishment, this still leads to another issue.
    3) Crew rotation: You have to get crew on and off the vessel, they still have to be given shore leave, etc etc. Best time to do this, is while in dock, you know, resupplying....
    4) Ever seen what happens to the hull of a ship that stays at sea for too long? Fouls up like you wouldnt believe, even modern anti fouling techniques will not work for ever as they degrade over time. As a result all ships will require their bottoms be scraped free of barnacles and the like, and those anti fouling measures being replaced. And yes, this IS important, depending on the hull it can knock off 5 - 10 knots from maximum speed.
    The 'nuclear ships range is effectively unlimited' is the kind of trash you expect from people who know very little about what maintaining a warship entails. Fuel is only a small part of the overall picture, and not even the most important part when it comes to deployment times.

  • @adamdubin1276
    @adamdubin1276 4 роки тому +4

    In the future when depicting an Aircraft Carrier please remember to put the superstructure on the Starboard (right) side of the ship.

  • @leMiG31
    @leMiG31 2 роки тому +1

    Carrier convention
    Russia and usa:talk to each other
    Englsnd:boast about their control of the waves
    Thailand:hi
    Every other carrier having countries:who tf invite he is

  • @jennifunny5421
    @jennifunny5421 6 років тому +26

    My Navy JROTC class was just talking about this

    • @boss38389
      @boss38389 6 років тому

      Jennifunny Animations and what did they said? :v

    • @jennifunny5421
      @jennifunny5421 6 років тому

      @@boss38389 idk mostly just general information about this and carriers in general

    • @lordanubis5053
      @lordanubis5053 6 років тому +1

      JROTC is nothing but a group of high school kids playing dress up

    • @jennifunny5421
      @jennifunny5421 6 років тому +1

      @@lordanubis5053 either you were never in jrotc or you were in a really really sucky program

    • @faustinojones7090
      @faustinojones7090 6 років тому

      But why the navy ? Why not other branches

  • @pnmthewhitehatboys2194
    @pnmthewhitehatboys2194 3 роки тому +3

    Literally any topic
    The Infographics Show : USA USA USA USA USA USA

  • @ted_kazinsky
    @ted_kazinsky 4 роки тому +4

    5:22 what is that

  • @AthenaSaints
    @AthenaSaints 4 роки тому +2

    Thigh-tanic's home port is at Pattaya City, Thailand.

  • @agerestricted9932
    @agerestricted9932 5 років тому +80

    Wow shocker, the ship designed for saving lives from natural disasters isn't as potent as a massive American warship

    • @chrisnelmes7180
      @chrisnelmes7180 5 років тому +7

      She used to carry Harrier jump jet fighters . They wore out.

    • @mpetersen6
      @mpetersen6 4 роки тому +4

      In 2005 when the earthquake and resulting tsunami struck Sumatra and Thialand the US Navy immediately sent a Nimitz Class to aid in disaster relief. Some way (French iirc) responded "what are the going to do, bomb them". It was then explained to him just how much fresh water a day the ship could put out. Just how useful the task forces choppers would be. And just how many rations they carried on board.

    • @Bartonovich52
      @Bartonovich52 4 роки тому +2

      How is the massive American warship potent? Didn’t they lose against a bunch of rice farmers?

    • @Bartonovich52
      @Bartonovich52 4 роки тому +1

      That and they always seem to be colliding with things and catching fire... or being snuck up on by Chinese or Swedish submarines.

    • @ΤΗΞΙηΣΑζΤΞΚδ
      @ΤΗΞΙηΣΑζΤΞΚδ 4 роки тому

      Bartonovich52 haha true

  • @ineedtocomment.2228
    @ineedtocomment.2228 4 роки тому +1

    Now Chakri Naruebet has no aircraft.But Sea hawk helicopteres are on duty.

  • @juancortesmas7581
    @juancortesmas7581 6 років тому +3

    Thing is even in the event of a war with another carrier bearing enemy, the ship wouldn't be as vulnerable as they say, as usually these ships navigate with an escort of many other ships which could be the ones to defend It from threats from the Air.

  • @PNolandS
    @PNolandS 6 років тому +1

    Incorrect, it is the smallest carrier in service, the smallest carrier ever (to my knowledge) would be the Bogue class light-carrier at 496 feet or 151 meters.
    Correction: The Long Island class would be the smallest at 404 feet or 123 meters.

  • @matthiskuhn3915
    @matthiskuhn3915 6 років тому +4

    Aircraft carriers are the best example for incredible rising technology....👍

  • @kospencer1
    @kospencer1 6 років тому +3

    The chionese has been like omg wtf look we haz an aircraft now, meanwhile the Thai who’s had an aircraft carrier since 20 yrs ago was like ......

  • @sergioagain8
    @sergioagain8 6 років тому +71

    I want one for my birthday 😀

  • @geordiegamingchannel728
    @geordiegamingchannel728 5 років тому +1

    Im sorry but your generalisation with the ramp design is wrong, harriers can take off vertically, so a ramp would help if full fuelled and loaded,
    also the carrier in this example is 16 knots but HMS Ark Royal and Illustrious can go up to speeds of 30 knots, the new QE class of AC for the royal navy has travel at speeds of 25 and over (Tsecret),
    your generalisation is incorrect, i served on both the Ark royal and Illustrious

  • @sameedwasi4566
    @sameedwasi4566 6 років тому +46

    Love for Thailand, from USA, Thiland doesnt need a strong military, since its foriegn relations are much stable

    • @ojutay8375
      @ojutay8375 6 років тому +5

      Octagon Leo now if only we could fix the human trafficking

    • @sameedwasi4566
      @sameedwasi4566 6 років тому

      Geoffrey, yes if only.

    • @ausore9832
      @ausore9832 6 років тому +9

      But China is *S C A R Y*

    • @hkchan1339
      @hkchan1339 6 років тому +2

      Their internal politics is a mess tho

    • @sameedwasi4566
      @sameedwasi4566 6 років тому

      HK Chan well thiland militsry has nothing to do with its internal conflict. It has a good gdp and does not need a strong military

  • @xamir1113x
    @xamir1113x 6 років тому +4

    The animated nimitz carrier had the superstructure on the wrong side...

  • @weeranairittiudom8126
    @weeranairittiudom8126 5 років тому +3

    Chaiyo ! From Thailand

  • @XpertPilotFSX
    @XpertPilotFSX 6 років тому +2

    As a Thai person, I'm sad that our military is so puny compared to other countries XD

  • @121SeedDestiny121
    @121SeedDestiny121 6 років тому +33

    Only Thailand has an aircraft carrier in the South East Asia. That's why their neighbor countries are envy about this.

    • @sivx17
      @sivx17 6 років тому +18

      Lol trust me nobody is envious of that.

    • @marvinbanzuela6336
      @marvinbanzuela6336 6 років тому +8

      Aircraft carriers are vulnerable to supersonic or hypersonic anti ship missile, so newly industrialized countries would see them as a waste of money instead. Light carriers such as these, however, are good for disaster relief and counter insurgency though.

    • @mithikx
      @mithikx 6 років тому +4

      Marvin Banzuela, the US Navy knows how vulnerable carriers are too. Of course "missile spam" can sink any surface vessel if the defense systems are overwhelmed (e.g. Falklands War), they've "lost" carriers in exercises as well to submarines and to small attack boats on suicide runs. The latter exercise being the highly controversial "Millennium Challenge 2002".
      But for the foreseeable future the carrier is here to stay until someone is dumb enough to sink one and bring the might of the US down upon them.

    • @demanischaffer
      @demanischaffer 6 років тому +2

      @@marvinbanzuela6336 "super sonic or hypersonic" not if the kill chain is broken, the missile will have track the carrier, keep the carrier locked, avoid getting shot down by escort ships or carrier aircraft, defeat electronic warfare measures from multiple ships, and physical counter measures,
      It's not very easy, just keeping the missile locked on target will be challenging as multiple destroyers, cruisers and the carrier itself try spoofing the missile, and if that fails the Cruisers and Destroyers will emit signals to make it's signature larger to cause the missile to be confused and redirect to a non carrier vessel

    • @alexsolosm
      @alexsolosm 6 років тому +2

      Nah, it can still be overwhelmed. The point of having aircraft carriers now is having enough of it. So the enemy knows even if they managed to sink one, five will make their way down and starting raining airstrikes on the country. Now that is something nobody in the right mind wants.
      If you only have one carrier and you build your entire navy around it, then good luck to you no matter how good it is.

  • @niguel6583
    @niguel6583 6 років тому +13

    But can it fly in the air and be invisible like in the avenger movie?

    • @floydlooney6837
      @floydlooney6837 6 років тому +2

      it's so small, that might be doable. lol.

  • @elkapitan75
    @elkapitan75 6 років тому +6

    Oooh how cute... I want one!

  • @QuantumRealm-
    @QuantumRealm- 6 років тому +2

    The only thing people call World of Warships is "The most f*cking pay to win game out there." Because they nerf all good ships that don't cost real money.

    • @QuantumRealm-
      @QuantumRealm- 6 років тому +1

      That is why I am waiting on War Thunder Navy since it will not be close to as P2W.

  • @olliredlake8475
    @olliredlake8475 6 років тому +5

    Boy that’s what I’ve been waiting for, I‘ll make sure to get the 250 doubloons and the 1M credits right away...😜
    but as always: great video 👌

  • @jamessullivan586
    @jamessullivan586 5 років тому +2

    I would think that the aircraft carrier for Thailand would also come in handy for disaster relief but also in anti-pirate actions

  • @Vincentlpp08
    @Vincentlpp08 5 років тому +3

    been there once or twice, it was nice ran down the runway when I was like 3. revisited it again and did absolutely nothing

  • @dapperfield595
    @dapperfield595 4 роки тому +1

    Alternate title: Chakri Naruebet vs the whole US Navy

  • @PhilipRhoadesP
    @PhilipRhoadesP 6 років тому +173

    Imperial units are a pain . .

    • @dave2885
      @dave2885 6 років тому +2

      Philip Rhoades P thats why the channel also ads metrical

    • @PhilipRhoadesP
      @PhilipRhoadesP 6 років тому +1

      That just encourages the stupidity . .

    • @keeganholthaus7143
      @keeganholthaus7143 6 років тому +10

      Philip Rhoades P stupidity? The only country to ever put a man on the moon used the imperial system. Get over it

    • @dave2885
      @dave2885 6 років тому +4

      Philip Rhoades P most of the views come from the US. The US citizens mostly learn the imperial system. If u believe u are superior, it shouöd be no problem for u to understand the measurements. But because u are complaining it looks like u dont understand both like most Americans actually do.

    • @dennism2336
      @dennism2336 6 років тому +17

      @@keeganholthaus7143 lol nasa uses metric units

  • @jamalimohamedali9925
    @jamalimohamedali9925 5 років тому +1

    Last I heard it's now a floating restaurant.

  • @dineshp9404
    @dineshp9404 6 років тому +6

    After the sponsor I knew why you made this vid😂😂

  • @murderbus
    @murderbus 4 роки тому +1

    Honestly any aircraft carrier is better than not having one

  • @egglisboingo335
    @egglisboingo335 4 роки тому +3

    Who would win, one big aircraft carrier or 30 small aircraft carriers

  • @mistytharpe3991
    @mistytharpe3991 3 роки тому +1

    If Thailand has a fully functional aircraft carrier of any kind it's still one-upsmanship on China.

  • @OO-rj4xn
    @OO-rj4xn 5 років тому +4

    เรือเราเล็กก็จริง

  • @WarhammerWings
    @WarhammerWings 3 роки тому +1

    Actually, the smallest aircraft carrier is a Shogun.

  • @Armorpiercer
    @Armorpiercer 6 років тому +7

    *actually na-ru-bet not na-ru-e-bet
    why would you want to take aircraft carrier into gunfight between ships?

  • @hydewhyte4364
    @hydewhyte4364 3 роки тому +1

    The fact that they're smart enough to keep their Harriers puts them ahead of certain other nations IMO

  • @willn.1938
    @willn.1938 6 років тому +8

    Many of these animations feature ships of the wrong country.. you use the Gerald Ford class CVN animation when explaining Chinese carriers. This issue is not isolated to this video either.

  • @iq4843
    @iq4843 6 років тому +1

    Thailand is a peacefull country which doesnt need any Carrier 🚤soo u can see it as an royal yatch ... for the royal thai family 👑

  • @wildpear4181
    @wildpear4181 6 років тому +3

    You Sunk My Battleship!

  • @rogerhonacki5610
    @rogerhonacki5610 5 років тому +1

    It’s a bee! A US Nimitz class carrier is a Tarantula Hawk. It can travel long distances, project power anywhere, and sting and sting and sting again with the most powerful venom in the world! The bee is short range, protects the hive and dies when it stings. It is purely defensive.

  • @khl2445
    @khl2445 6 років тому +3

    nuclear powered? god damn
    i wanna watch vids of its speed now

    • @introduxtion9836
      @introduxtion9836 5 років тому

      The Speed of some US Navy ship is classified.

  • @rys_188
    @rys_188 Рік тому

    Im glad you talk about chakri Naruebet thank you

  • @thornicus
    @thornicus 6 років тому +16

    Drink every time he says Chakri Naruebet

  • @revivrevalchn3503
    @revivrevalchn3503 6 років тому +1

    i think Chakri Naruebet should have decommission or sold off, here why
    1. She pretty much obsolete now with lagging electronic warfare, no longer have Harrier Jet and costly maintenance making her a money sinkhole in Royal Thai Navy
    2. A newer LHD could do the same job (Disaster Rescuing mission, Air-support and Stationing in Gulf of Thailand) with less cost and fitting the need of Thailand main strategy which is Defensive.
    3. the Airbase around the southern part and eastern part are able to cover the objective area with F-16 and newly JAS 39 Gripen whether to support our Navy or maintain air-superiority in our owned territory. And we don't really need such a offensive power from CV
    4. if we can sold Chakri Naruebet( or salvage and sold), Royal Thai Navy could have more fund to focus on their newly Frigate and Submarine from Korea and China or even afford a new LHD.
    5. again today she just an expensive vessel of thai's royal family, a symbol of their power and wealth and military propaganda.

  • @SRDPS2
    @SRDPS2 5 років тому +7

    0:02 Thailand in future,submarines are heart of naval fleet (mean 3 such submarines made in China lol)

  • @tsuaririndoku
    @tsuaririndoku 5 років тому +1

    HTMS CN is a carrier but she in service for very long time, shel cant contain aircrafts anymore due to out dated but she is the life saver ship that willing to save people. Chakri Narubet, the Life saver.
    This Cv is now mostly carries Chopper....

  • @TheClickbaiterA
    @TheClickbaiterA 6 років тому +44

    It's a ship! It's aqua man!
    No it's aircraft carriers

  • @CoffeeMug2828
    @CoffeeMug2828 5 років тому +2

    so... It's basically like the Yamato class of the Japanese though the Yamato class had serious fire power but rarely sortied because of fear of being lost.

  • @just-a-silly-goofy-guy
    @just-a-silly-goofy-guy 6 років тому +5

    That would be Ali a’s channel

  • @TITLE11005
    @TITLE11005 5 років тому

    Someone said this is not aircraft carrier because there is no aircraft land on this ship but you're wrong because there are many helicopters land on this ship. The purpose of this aircraft carrier is not use in war but join in disaster relieve mission like Tsunami. If there is war, this aircraft carrier still usefully. Soldiers transport, supplies and air support(Helicopters support) is what this ship use for.

  • @raymondsim8490
    @raymondsim8490 3 роки тому +3

    I think most countries wants to have an air carrier to project their air power for air defence but very few countries could afford to do so financially. So it is impressive that Thailand owns one.👍

  • @jonathanh.4405
    @jonathanh.4405 6 років тому +1

    Pride of my country

  • @squirepraggerstope3591
    @squirepraggerstope3591 6 років тому +2

    Given this seems to merely be an excuse for making utterly irrelevant comparisons with 100,000 tonne supercarriers, what are the respective costs?

  • @sandeepvuppalapati1574
    @sandeepvuppalapati1574 6 років тому +8

    how about u try to make a video comparing American tomahawk cruse missile and BrahMose cruse missile

    • @siddharthabhowmik
      @siddharthabhowmik 6 років тому

      Both are different missiles...
      Comparison should be done with Nirbhay and Tomahawk ...

    • @Killer553
      @Killer553 6 років тому

      Yeah a missile race !!!

  • @nickvinsable3798
    @nickvinsable3798 6 років тому +1

    Because of the importance of the Indian & Pacific Ocean Trade, it makes perfect sense for Thailand to have an Aircraft Carrier for its ‘Coast Guard’. Its better to be Prepared for something rather than nothing & I wouldn’t mind sharing tech modern enough for defense, not offense.

  • @hemangpatel9067
    @hemangpatel9067 6 років тому +3

    Can you do a video about current & in Construction Supercarriers by countries right now,it will be really Helpful..Thanks.😃👌🤘🤘😀

    • @TheInfographicsShow
      @TheInfographicsShow  5 років тому +1

      Maybe this will interest you:
      ua-cam.com/video/6Rf-y5d_tlo/v-deo.html

  • @johannjohann6523
    @johannjohann6523 Рік тому

    Factual and comedic. Good video and thanks for the smile.

  • @ruthvikchandra4715
    @ruthvikchandra4715 6 років тому +3

    Please make video on best programming languages of 2018 and which specialization is best for computer engineer?

    • @neeneko
      @neeneko 6 років тому

      The comments section would be epic...