You can fireproof a home much cheaper. I get your good intention. If you would maintain certain spesific products. It would get super expensive to rebuild.
That's basically just a house made of concrete panels. Not sure how they are linked together in a waterproof way, especially the roof panels. The question is, how is it insulated. The concrete panels by themselves do not provide very much thermal insulation.
Not an expert but going with "improper landscaping" with this one...yet again. By way of specific example Florida does not require their homes to be built properly "up" from the ground meaning using actual *ground* to be built up first and foremost before any building be had to ensure proper drainage. In the alternative would appear all of the highways in Southern California whilst certainly mitigating fire risk obviously to the City itself are not a sufficient fire break against the Seasonal #santa_ana_winds a very well known local phenomenon hence the name #santa_ana so imagine if you will a fire racing *DOWNHILL* not up...that is what the Santa Ana Winds are. "Improve the land first and not even have a structure of any kind" means there is less to catch fire and burn down yes, yes? 😊😊
Concrete its still a good earthquake proof if build with proper reinforcement ,better you choose who can withstand many2 times fire event then rare major massive earthquake
lol, this is basically just homes in Europe. European homes are typically built with fire-resistant materials like concrete, brick, or stone, and often feature plaster interiors instead of drywall. Stricter building codes and durable construction methods make it uncommon for homes to burn down completely. My family and I immigrated to the US after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Leaving an impoverished life, when we got here, we were expecting some kind of futuristic metropolis, and were blown away when we saw power lines on poles above ground and thin, wooden homes. My mother spent almost a decade exiled in a communist work-camp, and that was the last time she’d seen power lines above ground. In the old country, when a home burned, because it was all concrete, one would repaint and refurnish it, and the family would simply move back into the same home. The structure itself always remained intact. We had never heard of something actually burning down completely until we got stateside.
So what are the windows in the SAM house made from because as far as I know you can't see through concrete and glass melts back into what it began as in the extreme heats of wildfires.
Regardless of what the windows are made of your house will still be intact. So if your curtains catch fire yes everything in the room and many other rooms may burn but at least you have your home's entire frame and roof.
As long as fire isn't close this shouldn't be much of an issue it. Takes 1000 degree celsius to melt glass. Controlling brush and plants and maintance still maters.
Fire resistant. Not fireproof. As a business owner he should not set him self up for a lawsuit. The stuff inside will still burn. Unless you want to feel like you are living in pelican bay your home can still burn.
@@WasLostButNowAmFound yes but your couch isnt, your bed isnt, your table isnt, your plastic items arent. Do you want to sit on concrete and dry off your body with it?
This is ridiculous! There's polystyrene in most concrete products. There's also fiberglass...lol.. Only in Taxachusetts would garbage lies like this be possible. I guess this home would not have any furniture of plastic or electronics with plastic housings. All flammable along with all the heavy concrete products filled with highly flammable aggregate! ...lmfao
@hughickrath6671 No measurable rain doesn't start fires, people did. Also they have done 0 to maintain the brush neighborhoods and forests to prevent fires. Also the reservoirs that are now empty has 0 to do with rainfall. You know why they're empty you're just sticking your fingers in your ears and going LALALALALALA. If managed properly California should have so much water they wouldn't know what to do with it. But okay. It's climate change and Kamala lost because we are all racists and misogynysts. Keep voting blue. Hopefully more people just get out of California. The state is in shambles.
@@hughickrath6671 Just educate yourself more about why California is so badly mismanaged. Who started these fires. Why don't they clean and trim things and prepare every year for this and why the reservoirs are empty. If you really want to know. If not then blame it on climate change. Blame Kamalas lost to racism. That's fine.
This is how I would want to rebuild if my house burned.
I think someone is going to get very rich of this very soon.
Tile roofs and cement board siding are a step in the right direction.
Brilliant make it affordable please!!!
It isn't affordable it is pretty expensive to build with concrete. Building cost would double if not triple
Should make that law
You can fireproof a home much cheaper.
I get your good intention. If you would maintain certain spesific products. It would get super expensive to rebuild.
@@paxundpeace9970wood shouldn't be used - concrete or cement/bricks - that's the global standard.
Also maybe you could also surrounded a great deal of the perimeter of the home with some fire resistant materials on the ground like concrete
That's basically just a house made of concrete panels. Not sure how they are linked together in a waterproof way, especially the roof panels. The question is, how is it insulated. The concrete panels by themselves do not provide very much thermal insulation.
How does it do in an earthquake?
$400,000 to one million!
How much per square foot?
LOL affordable!
Yeah, only rich people deserve a safe life lol, according to the world today
450 to 320 per sqft not including land and access cost.
Quite expensive might work for some places in California. Still not all.
But, will the average household be able to afford it?
Windows on such a house would be a key weak point. Could metal shutters serve to reduce that vulnerability?
Homie about to be paid
Not an expert but going with "improper landscaping" with this one...yet again. By way of specific example Florida does not require their homes to be built properly "up" from the ground meaning using actual *ground* to be built up first and foremost before any building be had to ensure proper drainage. In the alternative would appear all of the highways in Southern California whilst certainly mitigating fire risk obviously to the City itself are not a sufficient fire break against the Seasonal #santa_ana_winds a very well known local phenomenon hence the name #santa_ana so imagine if you will a fire racing *DOWNHILL* not up...that is what the Santa Ana Winds are. "Improve the land first and not even have a structure of any kind" means there is less to catch fire and burn down yes, yes? 😊😊
So its alleged fireproof but is it earthquake proof?
Concrete its still a good earthquake proof if build with proper reinforcement ,better you choose who can withstand many2 times fire event then rare major massive earthquake
The title says "fireproof"....not "fire resistant".
Smart!
Im sure massively experience
I once heard of an unsinkable ship.
this is why you have test trials these days... and a house cannot sink
the factors here a far more manageable if someone put his mind to it
1912
lol, this is basically just homes in Europe. European homes are typically built with fire-resistant materials like concrete, brick, or stone, and often feature plaster interiors instead of drywall. Stricter building codes and durable construction methods make it uncommon for homes to burn down completely.
My family and I immigrated to the US after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Leaving an impoverished life, when we got here, we were expecting some kind of futuristic metropolis, and were blown away when we saw power lines on poles above ground and thin, wooden homes.
My mother spent almost a decade exiled in a communist work-camp, and that was the last time she’d seen power lines above ground. In the old country, when a home burned, because it was all concrete, one would repaint and refurnish it, and the family would simply move back into the same home. The structure itself always remained intact.
We had never heard of something actually burning down completely until we got stateside.
So what are the windows in the SAM house made from because as far as I know you can't see through concrete and glass melts back into what it began as in the extreme heats of wildfires.
Regardless of what the windows are made of your house will still be intact. So if your curtains catch fire yes everything in the room and many other rooms may burn but at least you have your home's entire frame and roof.
As long as fire isn't close this shouldn't be much of an issue it. Takes 1000 degree celsius to melt glass.
Controlling brush and plants and maintance still maters.
Rest of the world uses bricks and cement.
Lots of melted rims should have been Sam rims
Fire resistant. Not fireproof. As a business owner he should not set him self up for a lawsuit. The stuff inside will still burn. Unless you want to feel like you are living in pelican bay your home can still burn.
Concrete IS fireproof. Learn to english.
I'm thinking he knows way more about his designs than anyone of us in the UA-cam comments😂
@@WasLostButNowAmFound yes but your couch isnt, your bed isnt, your table isnt, your plastic items arent. Do you want to sit on concrete and dry off your body with it?
Florida needs water resistant homes….
Not water-wind.
They need both tbh
literally just use concrete instead of wood lmao that's it. that's the "groundbreaking" technology
The Titanic was supposedly " Unsinkable " !
This is ridiculous! There's polystyrene in most concrete products. There's also fiberglass...lol.. Only in Taxachusetts would garbage lies like this be possible. I guess this home would not have any furniture of plastic or electronics with plastic housings.
All flammable along with all the heavy concrete products filled with highly flammable aggregate! ...lmfao
No such thing. 🙄
the fire in California isn't about climate change. stop saying that.
😂😂😂😂 yes, it is
Really?..no measurable rain since last April!!
@hughickrath6671 No measurable rain doesn't start fires, people did. Also they have done 0 to maintain the brush neighborhoods and forests to prevent fires. Also the reservoirs that are now empty has 0 to do with rainfall. You know why they're empty you're just sticking your fingers in your ears and going LALALALALALA. If managed properly California should have so much water they wouldn't know what to do with it. But okay. It's climate change and Kamala lost because we are all racists and misogynysts. Keep voting blue. Hopefully more people just get out of California. The state is in shambles.
@@hughickrath6671 Just educate yourself more about why California is so badly mismanaged. Who started these fires. Why don't they clean and trim things and prepare every year for this and why the reservoirs are empty. If you really want to know. If not then blame it on climate change. Blame Kamalas lost to racism. That's fine.
No rain since last April use your brain wait
Beats insurance there, idk how they will look seeing you have “classy” ppl in cali, not bad idea