Nikon Z 180-600mm VR. First look. samples. image quality & focusing.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лип 2024
  • Hey everyone
    In this video we will take a look at the new Nikon Z 180-600mm f5.6-f6.3 VR
    we compare the lens to the
    Nikon 200-500
    Nikon 100-400
    Nikon 400 f4.5
    Nikon 400 f2.8
    Nikon 600 f4
    Nikon 800 f6.3
    00:00 Introduction
    02:10 design of the 180-600
    08:30 Lens weight
    11:50 Sample images
    17:08 sample Video
    18:48 Image Quality comparison
    26:30 Focus speed test
    28:43 Summery
    If you are interested in my photography: nikonricci?igsh...
    Thank you so much for watching
    Good Bye
    #nikon #nikonz #nikonz180600
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 378

  • @TorToroPorco
    @TorToroPorco Рік тому +122

    After a relatively quiet 2022 Ricci is once again working on fumes. Comparing the lens to all of the other lenses is something we’re not likely to see from anyone else, so one heck of a job by Ricci.

    • @gosman949
      @gosman949 Рік тому +1

      but I don't agree that it is better than my 100-400!

    • @RicciTalks
      @RicciTalks  Рік тому +6

      @@gosman949 It is but ok 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • @RicciTalks
      @RicciTalks  Рік тому +2

      Thanks for the support !

    • @markturriff994
      @markturriff994 Рік тому +3

      @@RicciTalksIf it is then it’s just gone onto my shopping list as the 100-400 is great

    • @plasmonreaktor5792
      @plasmonreaktor5792 Рік тому +1

      Thank you so much for the great video! A great lens, like all native Z-mount lenses - and for me a must have. To be fair, the 100-400 lens plus teleconverter does not look worse than the 180-600 lens plus teleconverter. A further video with a comparison at 400 mm, and at 200 mm (including the 70-200 and the two super zoom lenses: 100-400 and 24-200) would also be interesting. The inner zoom speaks clearly for the 180-600 mm lens as compared to the 100-400 lens, in terms of sealing.

  • @davidpearson3304
    @davidpearson3304 Рік тому +4

    The go to channel for Nikon gear information. No goofy gimmicks, no hyperbole or clickbait titles and you know that he’s had the lens/camera for a while to actually run it through its paces. Plus the fun of wondering what he has and is secretly testing that we will find out about in the future. 😬🤷🏼‍♂️

  • @Blitz_Shorts
    @Blitz_Shorts Рік тому +47

    18:50 this is what everyone wants from a review , you are the only one that let us see the image quality differences without having to download RAW files of each lens. I like the simplicity and maximum informative style of your channel videos. Keep it up! As for the new lens, it seems to be super sharp compared to what we used to see in zoom lenses. This lens is definitely going to be my goal to buy, cause I did want great Telephoto lens for a long time.

    • @Blitz_Shorts
      @Blitz_Shorts 5 місяців тому

      Update as of January 2024, I own this lens now.

  • @AtaBoraBasar
    @AtaBoraBasar Рік тому +20

    As a Canon user, this lens definitely deserves praise. When I compare it to Canon Rf 100-500mm, it has "mm" value in "f" value, no teleconverter usage restriction and it's great with its price. Congratulations Nikon, your comeback has been really great.🙌👏👏👏

    • @alansach8437
      @alansach8437 Рік тому +7

      The 100-500 is a great lens. It is light weight and portable. But come on Canon! Everybody has a sub-$2,000.00 150, 180 or 200 to 600mm 5.6-6.3 lens! Why are we (Canon users) paying $1,000.00 more for a shorter, slower (at longest focal length) lens?

    • @AtaBoraBasar
      @AtaBoraBasar Рік тому +3

      @@alansach8437 Absolutely correct fix. that's why I keep using my Canon Ef 100-400mm v2 lens, because the $1000 difference seems pointless to me 😉

    • @jorgepinogarciadelasbayonas
      @jorgepinogarciadelasbayonas 11 місяців тому +1

      @@AtaBoraBasar I have never understood why someone buys Canon. They were always a lot more expensive than the competition. Just like Apple: More money for less.

  • @johncalhoun4806
    @johncalhoun4806 Рік тому +5

    Excellent overview and appreciate all the detailed comparisons, observations, and assessments. The lens comparisons section was the best since I was very curious where this lens compared to the other usual suspects, so thanks for that side-by-side comparison while using a simple process!

  • @raomudasir6490
    @raomudasir6490 Рік тому +32

    Simply the BEST review of the Nikon 180-600 Z lens so far.. Unlike the other reviews where just the specs are being discussed pointlessly, the ever so detailed comparisons here, along with analysis of it with other lenses including picture comparisons.. Just the thing any potential decision maker is looking for.. Thanks

  • @shlawchablaas
    @shlawchablaas Рік тому +11

    I wasn’t even one of the people who have been clamoring for this lens, but wow, looks terrific. Great focal range, competitive launch price, TC compatibility (and the Z teleconverters are so good), internal zoom, nice weight, custom function buttons, focus seems fast and reliable, out-of-focus-rendering looks pleasant… I’m sure I missed several positive points (it was a half-hour’s worth of information to digest, after all!), but for me that seems like rather enough to recommend it. I guess I didn’t say anything about sharpness because I watched this before the higher resolution versions of the video had rendered, so I was watching in SD-but from what you said, which I trust, and from what I could see, it looks like a lot of lens for the price.
    Congrats for 45k, and congrats in advance for 50K!

  • @MegaBriarpatch
    @MegaBriarpatch Рік тому

    I appreciate the wealth of thorough comparison info you provide to us for every new Nikon product. I currently have the 100-400mm, and I've pre-ordered the 180-600mm. Looking forward to many years of extra reach for wildlife photography!

  • @cavedroid
    @cavedroid Рік тому +4

    Thanks for this great comparison. I was a bit disappointed by the results of the 100-400 next to it but I guess one other saving grace for the 100-400 is the fact that you can get much closer to your subject giving you a near macro like shooting experience. I ordered one even though I already have the 100-400 and will have to see how comfortable I am using and traveling with it. Keep up the great work!

  • @willlee2717
    @willlee2717 Рік тому +8

    Thank you Ricci! Just saw this on Wex and then your vid popped up answering all, and I mean all, my questions. You really have a gift for imparting a load of information in a short space of time in an interesting and coherent fashion. Thank you so much 😎🎥

    • @RicciTalks
      @RicciTalks  Рік тому +2

      Thank you for watching ! 😊

  • @sacberr
    @sacberr Рік тому +1

    Best and most comprehensive review out there. Really impressive job!

  • @photographydiscourse1185
    @photographydiscourse1185 Рік тому +10

    As always Ricci - a stellar review and great overview to this lens - well done :)
    -PD

  • @yidarmy1965
    @yidarmy1965 Рік тому +3

    Thanks Ricci. A very informative review. Having just purchased the Z8, I think this new 180-600 lens is where I’m going to for my wildlife and airshow photography. Roll on August!

  • @juanpsolf
    @juanpsolf Рік тому

    Thank you very much, Ricci! Yes, I was waiting for this lens and I'm loving it already.

  • @paulrainford70
    @paulrainford70 Рік тому +2

    Cheers for this first look Ricci. So glad this lens has finally been released. My pre-order was placed at Grey's first thing this morning! 🙂

  • @philyew3617
    @philyew3617 Рік тому +3

    Great video and a Fantastic review Ricci, Thanks.
    I especially like all the comparisons you made with other lenses, it leaves no doubt in anyone's mind what that lens is capable of. It's a beast of a lens and at the price it's a heck of a good purchase.

  • @cindyrroberts
    @cindyrroberts Рік тому +2

    Thank you for showing the focus test with the different AF modes!!!! Super helpful. This one is going in my birding kit. Thanks again for the thorough review and comparison with so many different lenses.

    • @RicciTalks
      @RicciTalks  Рік тому +1

      Thanks for watching it all 😊

  • @radinnasir8933
    @radinnasir8933 Рік тому +20

    Thank you so much for all the hard work to put out a thorough video.

    • @RicciTalks
      @RicciTalks  Рік тому +8

      Iv missed out on a lot of sleep 🤣

  • @irisotte83
    @irisotte83 Рік тому +5

    Thank you so much Ricci, great review. This lens is really something to consider.

  • @stephenluxton1235
    @stephenluxton1235 Рік тому +4

    Great review and appreciate the thorough comparison to all the other lenses available using the same test subject, which is just what I wanted to see. Been waiting for this lens since we got a Z7 four years ago, sadly just ordered a Z8 so now we're going to have to get 2!! 😬

  • @joebastura
    @joebastura Рік тому

    Great review. The comparisons with a variety of lenses and teleconverter combos were invaluable. Thanks!

  • @Walkinginthewoods
    @Walkinginthewoods Рік тому +1

    Excellent introduction to this exciting new lens. I am sure it is going to be very popular in the wildlife photography community.

  • @DerBitfluesterer
    @DerBitfluesterer 10 місяців тому

    Thank you very much for that excellent work! Amazing engagement like you do it always!

  • @mzeeshanch
    @mzeeshanch Рік тому +2

    Really nice work... Shows the ton of effort which you have put into the review... And all for us consumers... An amazing review...

  • @DarrellYoung
    @DarrellYoung 9 місяців тому

    Excellent and detailed review, Ricci. Thank you for sharing!

  • @BLAZEX09
    @BLAZEX09 11 місяців тому +1

    Great information! thanks for putting this together!

  • @acronymphotography
    @acronymphotography Рік тому

    Morning. I thought the addition of you chatting through sample images was particularly informative. Thanks as always, Simon.

  • @almostinfamous42
    @almostinfamous42 Рік тому +5

    Looks amazing, thanks for all your work Ricci i am going to start putting some money away for this, it looks incredible.

  • @laurencedunkley8097
    @laurencedunkley8097 Рік тому

    Hi Ricci, new to your channel, excellent delivery and clarity when discussing the new 180-600 , will now have to trawl backwards to see what else you've been talking about !

  • @patrickmolloy6994
    @patrickmolloy6994 11 місяців тому

    great review Ricci! Can't wait to get this as I'll be in the Chilean fjords in November and this will be the perfect lens for that trip!

  • @romainplagnol882
    @romainplagnol882 Рік тому +21

    After 4 years it's finally here. Nikon will sell truckloads of this lens 👍👍

    • @Lon1an
      @Lon1an Рік тому +1

      Tactical to sell the other telephoto lenses before this.

  • @craigcarlson4022
    @craigcarlson4022 Рік тому +2

    Yea!!! Finally. Ricci, unbelievably thorough review and comparisons. You’ve out done yourself. Thank you for such effort!

    • @RicciTalks
      @RicciTalks  Рік тому +1

      Thank you so much !
      It certainly took some time

    • @craigcarlson4022
      @craigcarlson4022 Рік тому

      @@RicciTalks I’ve placed my pre-order. Hopefully Nikon built up some early inventory for the launch.

  • @anthonyhurren5613
    @anthonyhurren5613 Рік тому +1

    Very thorough as always Ricci, good job!

  • @thefourthquarter7429
    @thefourthquarter7429 Рік тому

    Great review and exactly what I was hoping for! Will be ordering at some point.

  • @markturriff994
    @markturriff994 Рік тому +3

    Really liked your talking through the sample files - much more helpful and interesting than just showing the pics

  • @DoctorFish10
    @DoctorFish10 Рік тому

    Appreciate the comprehensive early review Ricci.

  • @williamwaung2514
    @williamwaung2514 Рік тому +1

    Great comparison review! You hit all the questions I have about the lens. Looks great, will have to see if I can save up enough to justify getting it in addition to the 200 - 500. 😜

  • @selectiveimagery
    @selectiveimagery Рік тому +3

    Thanks so much for the in depth review, have mine on order, although I have the 100-400 as well as the 500pF and 800PF I feel a long zoom is always a benefit to have for it's flexibility. If doing a birding trip I see this on one body and a prime on the other and I'm all set to go. Thanks again - Jeff

  • @mikenorton2727
    @mikenorton2727 Рік тому

    Hi Ricci, Nice to see the Z8. as a base being featured here🙂

  • @martinsarre
    @martinsarre Рік тому

    Well done Ricci, amazing review. It's great to that you showed it will not be as sharp as the S.Line primes.

  • @04801377a
    @04801377a 11 місяців тому +1

    Thumb up for this
    I am looking for this kind of comparison
    Thanks

  • @andymarlow_wildlife
    @andymarlow_wildlife Рік тому +1

    Nice review...best one I've seen so far..

  • @sbphotography3751
    @sbphotography3751 Рік тому +6

    Terrific, Nikon have a winner ;)

  • @Shamwari1960
    @Shamwari1960 10 місяців тому

    Excellent video comparison

  • @pahafx
    @pahafx Рік тому +3

    Great lens and great review. Interesting to see the 180-600 vs 400/4.5+TC1.4X and 800PF. 400/4.5+TC combo has the advantage of being around 620g lighter (wo tripod feet), and it still fits sideways in my Lowepro Protactic BP 450 II with the Z9.

  • @richardbagley4272
    @richardbagley4272 Рік тому +3

    Thanks Ricci for a great review. I have been looking for a replacement for my 200-500 and was considering the Z 100-400 to go on my Z6II but after watching this and listening to your thoughts I think the 180-600 will be the next lens for me.

  • @MooseHunter
    @MooseHunter 10 місяців тому

    very useful comparison; one of the best I've seen

  • @eajohnson
    @eajohnson Рік тому +10

    Hi Ricci, love your channel Just a suggestion - it would bed helpful to know the focal length used when looking at sample images taken with zoom lenses. We might assume these are all at 600 but particularly with variable aperture and variable close focus distance this may be times when one might prefer to crop.

  • @RealChrisinAZ
    @RealChrisinAZ Рік тому

    Great review Ricci!

  • @inteliov
    @inteliov Рік тому +4

    Thanks for the great video, it’s really helpful and I’m sure you are helping many people.
    I would love to see the 70-200 f4 F lens compared to the new 70-180. I’m guessing that I’m not the only one who is waiting for a native Z lens that I can switch to from it…

  • @Krongchai21725
    @Krongchai21725 Рік тому +3

    Thanks for the best review, I' ve already pre ordered.

  • @vanpir8032
    @vanpir8032 8 місяців тому

    Thanks Ricci, this was tremendous helpful to take my buying decision (Z8+180-600) and to my surprise I can pick it up coming Monday

  • @Pengranger
    @Pengranger Рік тому +1

    Excellent Ricci. I think I’ll be sticking with my 100-400mm and 800mm PF combination. I couldn’t carry around two large lenses!

  • @stanspb763
    @stanspb763 Рік тому +8

    This is the best lens overview on YT, yet again. I have almost lost faith in the photo community when some camera personalities have over 1 million subs and you are less than 50k.
    The lens is assuredly the best lens value in the industry. While I do not have the budget for what I would want, and seldom need 600mm, this one is on my wish list. One trait of this lens that was evident in all the comparison shoots was how creamy the out of focus rendering was. With the field shots and the test shots, that traits shined through.
    One can pre-order one now but there will be such a demand that it might take awhile for production to catch up to demand. The 180-600 is going to be very popular and might sway a lot of fence sitters to choose Z bodies over competition based on this lenses.

  • @rev_dude
    @rev_dude 9 місяців тому

    Thank you for this incredibly through review! I dont even have a Z mount camera (rocking a D7200) but your review was still a great watch, especially the comparisons section was super useful.

  • @billmumford5
    @billmumford5 Рік тому +1

    Really helpful review as always Ricci. Thank you. I have the Z 400 f4.5 which I love too. Your review has helped me make up my mind about what way to go for longer reach and have decided, despite the extra cost, on the Z 800 f6.3.

    • @RicciTalks
      @RicciTalks  Рік тому

      Great to hear you found it useful

  • @mick89827
    @mick89827 10 місяців тому

    After reading it, I subscribed to your channel and plan to buy one! Thank you very much!

  • @ozozzoo3840
    @ozozzoo3840 Рік тому +1

    you rock...! keep the videos coming...

  • @peterdoc5262
    @peterdoc5262 Рік тому +2

    Very nice comparrison 😊

  • @Getaway-uu1rn
    @Getaway-uu1rn 11 місяців тому +1

    Great comparison! The main thing its missing for me are image quality comparisons at other focal legths. I think fewer people are deciding between the 180-600 and a prime lens than there are people that have to decide between the 180-600, the 100-400 and the 200-500. So it would be awesome to see a comparison between these lenses at the same focal lenghts.

  • @Swindie
    @Swindie Рік тому +1

    I can’t wait to get mine!

  • @ivanbuckingham2302
    @ivanbuckingham2302 Рік тому +4

    Nikon as so lucky to have you testing their products.

  • @juliawintermoyer8418
    @juliawintermoyer8418 10 місяців тому

    A great review, comparing to the other lens helps us see a clearer picture of what we are purchasing.

  • @opyadav
    @opyadav 8 місяців тому

    That was very thorough and helpful. Thank you!

  • @justinlintecum
    @justinlintecum Рік тому

    Thanks Ricci! Been waiting for this lens. Very happy the price was better than I was expecting. Got one on preorder.

  • @JulioCesar-ez6wf
    @JulioCesar-ez6wf Рік тому +4

    So far I think this lens is PERFECT for the price/weight/purpose. Obviously there better lenses, but 10x more expensive and 3 times heavier. And the fact that is internal Zoom/focus is just the 🍒 on top. Sony must be freaking out!!!!!

  • @Nick-13
    @Nick-13 Рік тому +4

    Extremely interesting and useful video Ricci. I have the 400 F4.5 - it is a superb lens. My dilemma is - do I need that extra focal length, yes from time to time. And I do really appreciate the flexibility of a zoom. Extremely tempting, and wonder how long I can be without the 180-600 ! Looking like the best all round wildlife lens (for the occasions when I shoot wildlife). Guess it will be a top selling lens

  • @davidjohnson4451
    @davidjohnson4451 Рік тому +7

    A spectacular video!!! I own the 100-400 S and the 400 f 4.5 S and use them on the Z 9 and Z 8. I intended to get the 180-600 ASAP. It was a Long Wait! I have pre-ordered it all ready.

    • @RicciTalks
      @RicciTalks  Рік тому +1

      Hope you get it soon !

    • @graemechow88
      @graemechow88 Рік тому

      hI David , between the 100-400 and 400 f4.5 S which one you think is better if I am not shooting macro or landscape as I have other lenses to cover up to 200mm. I like the 400 f4.5 in term of more lower ISO due to aperture but how it is compare to focus speed and uses to zoom 100-400 Z?

    • @davidjohnson4451
      @davidjohnson4451 Рік тому +1

      @@graemechow88 I use the 400 f 4.5 more. It focuses faster! However then you don't have the ability to compose the 100-400 has. As you are covered to 200mm I would go to the 400 lens! I use that on a Z 8 now FULL TIME!

  • @reginaldogarcia770
    @reginaldogarcia770 Рік тому

    Excellent review! I know what to expect from this lens ehen i buy it.

  • @johnhjic2
    @johnhjic2 Рік тому

    Hello Ricci, This look so nice I see were to 70mm-180mm fit in the range now. I will be interested to see this one. Keep well, keep safe and stay happy.

    • @DoctorFish10
      @DoctorFish10 Рік тому

      Isn’t that gap filled by the 70-200?

  • @jornpaulini3920
    @jornpaulini3920 Рік тому +2

    Super interesting video, the lens is on my wishlist... a comparison between the new 70-180 2.8 and the 70-200 2.8 lens would be much appreciated - a choice I have to make soon.

  • @JayBlue2U
    @JayBlue2U Рік тому +5

    So happy the 180-600 lens is available for preorder! 🎉

  • @HokKan
    @HokKan Рік тому

    Thank you so much for the image quality comparisons. Decent budget tele lens, but I'd pay the extra for the pf. It is just so much better.

  • @ciureamihai
    @ciureamihai Рік тому +2

    Best presentation of this awesome lens, Ricci!
    Love it!!!
    I watched the rest of guys who have test it, but your test is superior! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
    For now i use 200 500 FTZ with Z9 and this video was Very usefull to decide that is the best lens for me! 💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻

  • @01gsx1
    @01gsx1 Рік тому +2

    Great video as usual. I just pre-order mine today, and I'm selling the 200-500mm.

  • @ranziphotography7540
    @ranziphotography7540 Рік тому +1

    great review, great glass by Nikon after making us wait for 3 years, Nikon took a bold decision of making 180mm which will impact its 100-400 sales. Nikon is Late but latest, Nikon back into the business. The only aspect missing now is Nikon D500 variant, a 32MP apse body with 20fps.

  • @dunnymonster
    @dunnymonster Рік тому +1

    Pre ordered....no doubt I won't see it this side of Xmas lol 😋

  • @gyozakeynsianism
    @gyozakeynsianism Рік тому +1

    Great video Ricci. This new lens puts that venerable old 200-500 to shame. Oh well, I still love my 200-500.

  • @rokingsonOO7
    @rokingsonOO7 Рік тому +7

    Definitely will be getting one... ❤

  • @Medizinmann36
    @Medizinmann36 Рік тому +1

    This video is great. Thanks😊

  • @davidosborn3356
    @davidosborn3356 Рік тому +6

    Another excellent and informative video Ricci and very well done to you. I’ve been waiting for this lens a really long time and it doesn’t seem that I’ll be disappointed. I was really interested in seeing the actual zoom rotation distance which seems fabulous and the quality at 600mm which seems to surpass the 200-500 at 500 and as important it’s lighter. So improvements where I wanted to see them. Excellent, we just need the lens now!

    • @RicciTalks
      @RicciTalks  Рік тому +1

      Thanks for watching !
      The zoom distance is reallly nice and short

    • @davidosborn3356
      @davidosborn3356 Рік тому +1

      @@RicciTalks After the excessive turn on the 200-500 this will be wonderful.

  • @hishamosman4341
    @hishamosman4341 Рік тому +5

    For the price alone, everything is forgiven. Base on the pictures, it is sharp enough for me. Now we have many oprions tp choose from? I will still say the 100-400 is a good compromise in terms of reach and aperture

  • @t.k.1448
    @t.k.1448 Рік тому +2

    Ignoring the 200-500, considering the 180-600 is 40%cheaper than the next cheapest lens that being the 100-400, and the difference going up quickly from there, I think it holds up really well. The bokeh and background blur is very nice without having to add the qualifier, "for the price." Nikon is going to sell a ton of these and I will most likely buy one even though I already own the 100-400. The only thing which would dissuade me is if Nikon's next announcement is a 600 version of the 400 f4.5. A spiritual Z-mount replacement for the 500 f5.6 PF if you will. Kudos for taking the time to do all the comparisons, it is definitely what most people who tuned in wanted to see!

  • @dominiclester3232
    @dominiclester3232 Рік тому +3

    Thanks Ricci!!

  • @8-Bit-Retro
    @8-Bit-Retro 4 місяці тому

    Many thanks for the video. I'm after a zoom for my Z8 and your comparison has helped.
    One 'would be nice if' - when you show the shots with the details in the top left, adding the actual focal length of the shot. This would allow us to judge centre and edge clarity across the range for a more informed view of your photos.
    Thanks again.

  • @rensuchan
    @rensuchan Рік тому +5

    I definitely want it... I have the old 200-500 and I just prefer native Z glass.
    That being said, the 200-500 is my least used lens nowadays so I can't really justify the expense of switching. The 70-180 f/2.8 probably makes more sense for me and I'm looking forward to what you have to say about that lens, especially if you have the old F mount 70-200 f/4 to compare it to.
    Maybe I'll pick this up in a few years when it makes more sense for me :)

  • @peterdoc5262
    @peterdoc5262 Рік тому +2

    Great review-Must have!!!😂

  • @tyrbjornbostrom604
    @tyrbjornbostrom604 11 місяців тому

    Nice comparisons and well summarized. It would be interesting to compare with very professional but old lenses such as AF-S 500 / f:4 and 200-400 / F:4 for example. These lenses can be bought for reasonable money today.

  • @FrederickDunn
    @FrederickDunn 11 місяців тому +1

    Hi Ricci, you did a nice job reviewing this lens. Very thorough. I'm so glad you covered the closest focus distance as that's important for my work. Are you comfortable letting the weight of the lens be supported by the camera body mount alone? I've never had that mount fail, but curious if you took the foot off if depending on the mounting ring alone would possibly fail after extended use. Thanks. It's a great advantage for me that the lens does not physically get longer or shorter when zooming so I can use static camouflage. Btw, that house sparrow at 18:37 kills off so many songbirds, truly a grizzly little bird species.

  • @user-mk7pp2pz6p
    @user-mk7pp2pz6p 11 місяців тому

    Wow I just bought one
    and a whole filters set for landscape from Kase. Can't wait to try! It's a very good camera!

  • @tectoramia-sz1lu
    @tectoramia-sz1lu 10 місяців тому

    I have this on order and can't wait to get my hands on it. I'd like to see a few photos of it at 600mm with the 2xTC attached.

  • @attilaborviz7311
    @attilaborviz7311 6 місяців тому

    Great review. I waiting a review for 70-180 f 2.8 to. Thank you

  • @cbphoto87
    @cbphoto87 Рік тому +4

    Actually glad I bought the 500 pf used instead of waiting an eternity for this lens. This thing was going to live at the top end of the focal range for me anyway and now that I’ve gone to primes for my superteles I can’t see myself going back

    • @steveross556
      @steveross556 Рік тому

      I have the 500pf and it had been a great lens on the D850. For BIF in many conditions, it was not fast enough with a TC1.4. Having VR in both the lens and camera could be a major advantage.

  • @WildEarthPhoto
    @WildEarthPhoto Рік тому +2

    Excellent comparison without fluff. Nice video. After watching this, it seems the 180-600 is the ideal lens for a zoom to be paired with a prime when you need versatility. This with the 500PF, 400 f/4.5, 800PF, or 600 would be an amazing combination to carry around (well, lug around). Seems to be the only video around at the moment with actual side-by-side comparisons.

    • @steveross556
      @steveross556 Рік тому

      I think the purpose of this lens is so you do not have to carry around the other lenses.

  • @dxingchenify
    @dxingchenify Рік тому +12

    $1,699 for the 180-600mm!? That's a great price!

    • @gosman949
      @gosman949 Рік тому +2

      how dare he say that this lens is better than my $2700 100-400!

    • @dxingchenify
      @dxingchenify Рік тому +4

      @@gosman949 I just pre-ordered my copy. I couldn't resist.

    • @451greenwood
      @451greenwood Рік тому +1

      Great price compared what

    • @johnl2613
      @johnl2613 Рік тому +2

      @@gosman949 I doubt it. But it's ~$1000 cheaper lol

    • @Blitz_Shorts
      @Blitz_Shorts Рік тому +3

      @@gosman949 better value for sure, and 1/3 stop is really a tiny sacrifice , considering how sharp this lens is even not being an S line.

  • @sekaf4125
    @sekaf4125 Рік тому +1

    Really appreciate your channel nd no bs approach to your videos. I sold My D850 and bought the Z8. Iam so thrilled to have the level of focus that I’ve never had. Just amazing. I usually buy RRS lbrackets but with the price an ounce of over$200 I ordered the small rig full . We’ll see how it works. Ricci alot of comments on the update to theZ9 ”4.0”. I so hope we get the exposure delay and the auto zone capture to the Z8. In your opinion do you think we’ll get those? I live in southeast alaska and would love the zone feature!!! Keep up the great work

  • @jzsanchez
    @jzsanchez Місяць тому

    Thank you, Great review. I decided to buy this lens based on your review. I already have the Nikon 500 F4 VR2, This is a great lens but i feel that i can do more with this lens. The editing from Photoshop will compensate for sharpness and saturation contrast.

  • @minusinfinity6974
    @minusinfinity6974 Рік тому +3

    Awesome work Ricci, thanks for this. 180-600 @ 600mm is definitely better wide open than the 100-400 S @ 400mm wide open. Given the 180-600 is not an S that's remarkable result. I think it makes the price of the 100-400 S untenable, it's not worth $1K more at all. The 180-600 is much better than the 100-400 S + 1.4x too.

  • @kevinbinks8722
    @kevinbinks8722 Рік тому +1

    Great review as always. Glad its finally here. Deposit has been put down on this already. Any idea of a specific day in August for release? How much extra weight/cost would it have been to put the 180mm portion at f4.5 just to allow a little bit more light, in low light conditions? That way the middle portion of the lens could have been a bit of a lower F number as well. Or is it that to small of a diffeence to bother with?

  • @tw9535
    @tw9535 Рік тому

    Thank you! From a new subscriber.