Secrets Revealed in SpaceX Starship Launch Video
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 чер 2023
- You may have seen the launch of Starship and Super Heavy, but did you notice all the OTHER things revealed by SpaceX's Integrated Flight Test highlight reel? NSF's John "Das" Galloway explores the video in detail... and bets... even if you know everything about Starship... there are probably things you missed in the latest official video.
The original SpaceX video can be found here: • Starship | First Integ...
⚡ SpaceX Mission Control Chairs (pretty close, and not SpaceX prices, affiliate link)⚡
🔗 amzn.to/3qzHTae
⚡ Seen in this Video⚡
🔗 Falcon Heavy LIGHTNING METAL PRINT: shop.nasaspaceflight.com/prod...
🔗 NSF Shop: www.nasaspaceflight.com/shop/
⚡ Become a member of NASASpaceflight's channel for exclusive discord access, fast turnaround clips, and other exclusive benefits. Your support helps us continue our 24/7 coverage. Click JOIN above to get started.⚡
🤵 Hosted and Produced by by John Galloway (@kspaceacademy)
🎥 Video from Starbase Live (nsf.live/starbase), and SpaceX.
✂️ Edited by Thomas Hayden.
🔍 Original content copyright NSF. Not to be used elsewhere without explicit permission.
L2 Boca Chica (more clips and photos) from BC's very early days to today.
🔗 forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...
(Join L2 and support NSF here: www.nasaspaceflight.com/l2/)
#starship #starshipexplosion #starbase #spacex #bocachica #spacex #rocketlaunch - Наука та технологія
When's the next launch? July, August, September, later? Also, if you like what we do here, join up! ua-cam.com/users/NASASpaceflightVideosjoin
I say not long after some WDRs and static fires ! I wouldnt rule out late july early august if all goes welll
August is my hopeful month but probably going to be in September as it seems more likely.
September hopefully!
I'm hoping for a 6th of september (9) launch, haha, perfect match for the april(4) 20th launch
Rebar starting to go in under the OLM today. Pad done mid July. B9 testing for a few weeks. Next launch the last week of August.
I love how you analyze every single detail, even those minor details like the camera location, the direction, something many people don't care about. Good job NSF team.
@kspaceacademy way to raise the standard for extracting as much possible info from videos! so much better than repeating elon's latest schedule estimate (or even less informed speculations)- more time on noticing actual things and thinking about them intelligently. so worthwhile and appreciated, thx.
😂 be careful ❤
Small point about the windows shaking in the control room, sound travels much much faster through the ground
exactly. I was at a shuttle launch (#8) and I recall seeing the ignition first, then feeling it through the ground, then hearing it. nice real world confirmation of physics.
That's interesting... not something we noticed at any of our camera sites (shake/vibration before the actual sound hit)... but now I want to go back and look again with a specific eye for that. -Das
Love this video Das, thanks
@@NASASpaceflight stabilisation will cancel it out
Indeed, ground appears to be more dense than air, who would have thought.
As a kid, I followed the space program from Mercury thru Gemini & Apollo. My eldest brother sent a letter to Von Braun offering his advice on spin stabilization...and received a reply. Later, I worked for the Air Force and with some NASA engineers and technicians in my line of work with the AF. My interest in space never waned. What SpaceX is doing now is beyond amazing. The rate of their progress is astonishing. They have no equal. It is gratifying to see how much Musk and SpaceX appreciate and respect NASA and how NASA regards them in return, and how seamlessly they work together to push the bounds of the possible in space exploration. If we allow them, the things they accomplish in the coming years will be the stuff of legend.
Hope that letter survived in some way 😮
China would like to copy everything, but I don't see original ideas coming from the homogenous group of clowns.
I loved every nerdy detail in this video! Please do more like this, Das.
THIS is why I am here. Just freakin fantastic, and exactly what I don't have the time to go find on my own. Love the detail, love the presentation, love the explanation...and most importantly, the dedication. Well done.
Absolutely! it made me subscribe :))
True Space & Rocket Nerds absolutely love “wringing every last bit” out of any video. Data & information is our bread & butter.
Please keep on with these videos!!
🖖
We need the 2 hour long version of this Das!
I am still amazed how FREAKING WELL the hull held with all those rolls, the structural integrity is mind-blowing, concidering the thickness of the steel rings is less than 5 mm
LOOPS! in an aircraft that's called a loop. A roll is a rotation around the longitudinal axis.
@@spacecadet1249 the more you know haha thanks
@@spacecadet1249 on UA-cam it's not a loop or a roll, it's called a flipity flip-a-roo and it's said in Ozzy Man style.
@@PollokPoochesDogWalking Indeed, these preceded the ultimate "spready to the gods".
@@spacecadet1249I d call it more like a corkscrew, or even a pirouette. Starship is a beautiful ballerina, pirouetting through the sky
Your clear interest and excitement in presenting this material is very apparent, John! Thanks for taking us through it!
It’s doesn’t matter if you guys are milking it. I’m learning more and more about rockets . From how they build to launching it. Not just space x but other company’s out there. Thankyou NSF team for your knowledge and dedication to this wonderful channel. Love you all guys and gals.
Milking it? Not even sure how that's possible. It's a channel about this topic. But we aren't going to learn much from SpaceX, so it's a good thing there are channels like this.
@@RichardBaran totally agree. The more info the better. I’ve learned so much since the water tank to the skys aka Hopi (if that’s spelt right)
Thank you... you shoulda seen the video run time before we trimmed out all the "mildly interesting" stuff ha - Das
Knowing you and the team Das yeh I wouldn’t be suprise on how long the original video was lol. From a fellow galloway across the pond
@@NASASpaceflight I think 11 hours 52 minutes is just the right length for an NSF video. We want the full version! I mean, this is pretty good too... thanks!!!
this need to be a "the more you know, with NSF" serie. Very nice job.
I looked at a lot of Richard Scarry "Busytown" books as a kid. 😆 - Das
John don't be so self conscious, you are crushing it. From a helicopter Maintenance supervisor, all this in depth analysis is very interesting to me. I love your insights.
Appreciate you Paul, thanks! - Das
Also, Das, there are many of us that nerd out on the camera/filming of all this, not just the rocketry. How all of this is recorded is definitely interesting!
From telemetry it is clear that there was a big lox leak, this would be consistent with the plume which is also no doubt being coloured with leaking hydraulic fluid as there would have been gallons of that on board and it doesn't take much spraying into the exhaust to produce a very bright colouration. The tiles held up pretty well all things considered, I believe the odd missing tile doesn't even cause problems for reentry, only a problem if a patch of several tiles are missing. That said there is still some work to do with the tiles and it will be interesting to see how they hold up to an actual reentry.
About your question at 23:25: In another shot of the booster you could see that some protection panels on the outside off the engines got ripped off, but not completely so they were just dangling at the bottom of the booster. And because sheetmetal is very springy those panels would be flung into the engineplume at a very consistent rate, entering them than getting burned by the engine exhaust(That would explain the color of the short flame outbursts because when metal burns it gives off an orange white color) and than exiting the plume again because of the mentioned springyness. And that cycle would repeat over and overr again.
That´s my explanation at least.
Greate Video! Keep it up :D
I am 100% sure the 'Myth Busters' would give that a P L A U S E A B L E rating. 👍🏼🚀
I though that might be hydraulic fluid as a damaged engine tried to gimbal and bled.
NSF doesn’t get enough love on UA-cam for their 24/7 dedication providing us and other creators with footage. With that said- I love seeing content like this in your channel, but we’re also just grateful for the hours and work you put in that allow us to keep up with the ongoing. Thanks NSF team
Thanks, Thrust. 😅 -Das
Zero complaints. Excellent work. I can't imagine what type of viewer would watch the entire video if they didn't find it interesting.
I have gone back and re-watched this a couple of times and each time the John Galloway’s enthusiasm and observations are so awesome that I have to declare this a post-launch reaction masterpiece!!!
Each time I view this I catch something I missed previously. Love it!
Well shucks, thanks! - Das (aka John)
Great video. Wow the things you have pulled from a two min video is impressive thanks
Mr John Galloway You have a style that lifts these videos to a level beyond anything else ❤.
No other can do what you do the way you do it.
Love it! Please continue! 🥰
Very well presented. I appreciate the amount of detail and the analysis. I've been watching since before Starhopper's first hop and NSF is First Class.
Excellent! Thank you from Switzerland!
This video was so interesting and entertaining that the 30+ minutes just flew by! Thanks for feeding my rocket-nerd mind!
Das, you can "overanalyze" anything you want for us. Keep up the great work. We all did the same thing with the footage and we loved that you went through it with us. THANK YOU
Webster has add "uncontrolledly" next to "uncontrollably"
Thanks for the amazing and nit picky detailed analysis. Love every second! Keep it up!
Love this format! Das is the perfect host for these deep dive videos. Nice work, gang. :)
Would love to see a video on the train tracks
I appreciate you Das! You and NSF provide incredible insight and detail into everything and I thank you!
I absolutely love the level of detail that SpaceX releases. I love seeing people at least a little smarter than I glean details that I would have missed.
So much fun to watch! Great job man!
Very much appreciated that analysis - even the small bits of detail - please do keep making these videos. :)
My 3 guesses for OTS would be either Object Tracking System, Off-The-Shelf (camera) or On the Scene/Opportunity To See (these 2 are 100% TV/Film terminology). Awesome analysis as always, love watching these.
Orbital Test Site?
@@BrianZier that also crossed my mind too, and if they were situated in the test (cryo/engine) area of the site, that would probably be what it is.
Orbital Tank Surveillance?
I found the term Over The Shoulder, but I do not expect a cameraman on those locations :P
If OTS is Over The Shoulder, OT 88 QD could be Over The QD. Or just the Canon EOS 88 QD camera 🤔
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Over-the-shoulder_shot
Standard terminology for OTS is Off The Shelf. It is used in all government contracts.
As a videographer myself, love the behind the scenes analysis and gearporn! Please keep making these videos!
Please release the full hour and a half next time! Those of us that are watching a half hour vid would gladly watch longer ones!! Excellent vid! Ty!
Based on the angle and view the OTS is probably one of the cameras at the Orbital Tracking Station area. There are several cameras installed on poles in that area.
Doubting that now for the other OTS cameras
That was my guess, too. OTS=Orbital Tracking Station, which I think is what I've heard the satellite dish area called.
Standard terminology for OTS is Off The Shelf. It is used in all government contracts.
what about Orbital Tower Site
Yeah I was thinking orbital test site
Love these behind the scenes!!
Maybe OTS stands for orbital test stand or something
Orbital Tower Stack?
Orbital Test Site?
This is what I'm thinking too.
@@U_Geek are u turkish?
Thanks guys! Love these videos
I love that you put in all the work and effort to find these details and bring them to our attention. You may have analyzed the footage better than any SpaceX employee lol.
Yeah. NASA 2 inch bolt: $19,500. Result:cracked, used anyway. SpaceeX bolt: $75. Result: Perfect fit and still used. Cost to taxpayers on NASA bolt still going on for 40 years. Spacex bolt, recycled after inspection, still perfect. Cost to taxpayers: ZERO.
Absolutely fascinating.😊
Thanks John and NSF. Great analysis! Most excellent! Good job! More please! Tom from Titusville here.
TY - I really like this kind of analysis video. Please keep them comming!
Wow, you've found so many tiny details in all those videos! Got me glued to the monitor for half-an-hour.
I think the line graph at 15:40 is the bar of pressure from every engine or the flow of fluids through the engines
Good fun! Excellent analysis. Definitely a lot of things I hadn't caught.
Loved it! The more nerding out the better John 😃
I love this sort of video forensics
I think you guys, and also most of the other main spacex coverage sites is to remind people, when you are pointing stuff out (and with spacex's constant fast nonstop development of everything, even us needs occasionally forget) that starship is still prototype and development stage for the system for everything from the buildings, to launch Mount, to the booster and various starship types are almost constantly being studied and changed, in all kinds of minor and major ways
Loved the 'over analysis'. A few things I had not picked up previously. Nice stuff.
A great in depth breakdown and analysis, thanks Das and the NSF team.
Thanks for the Dasplination ;) Brilliant video thanks as always Das and Thomas 😊
Thank You NSF & Das got this informative Analysis video
SuperHeavy / Starship launch - September. Learned a bit about the layout of Starbase and the local environs. Learned a bit more about the 1st test launch of SuperHeavy / Starship. Thanks for the analysis and lessons!
Awesome and very interesting video NSF. Top quality 👍🏻👍🏻
Love these Dasplanation videos!
Keep analysing NSF, we will keep watching!
The occasional deep dive is always appreciated.
"Give me a thumbs up to give me an excuse to keep doing these sorts of things" - Like you've EVER needed an excuse to do anything like this, that's why we love you all so much!
With the “sprt” from the plume at the long range view, if you look at the cosmic perspective videos, you can see that those “sprts” are the shielding on the side of the rocket flapping into the plume, and vaporizing. Timecode 23:20
9:52 - 10:15 Thats the best part of the video, you learn so much about Starship
Yahooo! Perfect commentary and superb analysis. Thanks you so much. Please keep these analytical videos coming.
Nice vid John. Appreciate the detail.
Nicely done DAS, I thoroughly enjoyed that!
After exploding there's a few frames with part of the tank falling. If you watched the ground tracking stations after the explosion, they both followed something all the way down to the horizon - booster and ship separately.
Great analysis. So glad that you are doing more videos like this.
Those internal cameras at 8:36 I think are:
S24 engine bay
S24 payload bay (looking up into the nosecone with the header tanks)
Inter-stage (camera attached to top of B7)
S24 CH4 tank
Excellent presentation dude...very informative. Teasing out some of the detail...very well done!
Fantastic detail! Thanks for your dedication!!!
Brilliant show. Love to hear this level analysis. Usually hear the same report a dozen ways. Hood job!
Thanks a lot for the details. Good job. Having participated in a few failure boards in me old AF satellitin' days ('70-'92), I hope you'll do a detailed presentation of SpaceX's post-op findings. You know… engineering archaeology
This was very well done. 10/10 Information, Editing, Narration
I tend to over analyze so this video was the entire goodie bag. Seriously great content and yes please. Also uncontrolledly 😂
Great- thanks- I appreciate the time it took you to put this together.
Thank you for nice analysis, I liked it!
Outstanding deep dive again..
That was fantastic and VERY informative. Cheers mate. 👍👍👍👍 UK
Simply Amazing Video!!! Please do more and Thank you. By far the best UA-cam channel covering Spaceflight.
Great video, loved the “Still more engines than Booster 4” line. You missed the QD vent just before launch, happens at 34s in the original highlight video from spacex.
Just wanna say that I love the 'Das Explains' videos. Makes me miss the Twitch streams a bit 🥲
Same though -Das
Great production DAS!
There's no such thing as overanalyzing-- that's why we're here!
Best episode ever at NSF. Thanx Das :)
Really insightful video and gave such a great view on how much data is available from so little content. Thnx NSF keep it coming.
Excellent video! Thanks Das!
This analysis was great
Well done. This type of commentary is exactly why I watch your channel. Thanks🤗
John you just keep doing! I can't get enough detail!
Loved the analysis breakdown, Das! please keep 'em coming!!!
Perfect content. DAS forever.
NSF: time to turn 2 minutes of SpaceX video into 30 minutes of analysis
All of us nerds:
Das and NSF y'all rock! Peace
B7 truly was the booster that refused to die. Had its downcomer collapse, experienced detonation when attempting spin prime, and all along the way people kept saying that “that’s it for B7, it’s not launching”
and in the end, not even the FTS could take it out.
An appropriate sendoff for the unkillable booster
In this case RUD means: Ruptured Under Duress.
I have learned! Thanks! BTW, that QD arm retracting at full speed, oh boy, nice shot!
Absolutely excellent program. Keep this type of reporting going.
I find Das is so interesting and love the way he brings the information over. Very enjoyable, keep it going Das!😊
Fantastic and A-Ma-Zing video Das!
Greatest educational NSF video yet! Excellent production!
So cool! Thanks for doing that! Rekindles the excitement for the next one.
Great analysis. Love your channel
Really interesting and in depth review of the first attempt of the starship launch. Congrats!