Technically yes, but then you're limited to mechanized and motorized infantry without heavy armor support, and the artillery is going to get left behind, as well as a lot of logistics is done via non-amphibious trucks. That's why bridges are important, for the heavier stuff.
@@michaelthayer5351 actually, the Warsaw Pact military was made so 90%+ of the ground vehicles would have the ability to cross waters even without bridges, as a matter of fact, this goes even for logistics, artillery support, anti-aircraft defense, tanks, and MBTs. (The snorkel tube on the majority of Soviet tanks, you can see it mostly on the turrets) Yes, it is definitely harder and slower thus less effective, as a result though, it was and is better than nothing and something unique that the opposition side did not have in such a number. Some examples of Soviet vehicles with water crossing ability are: BMP family AFVs BTR family AFVs MT-LB universal carriers (this includes even logistic versions) T- tank family Medium/Main battle tanks (from T-54 up to T-80s and T-72s) Gvozdika SPG 9K33 Osa SAMS ... (Some vehicles needed further preparation in order to cross the waters such as the T- tank family vehicles, but most of them were prepared for such events 24/7)
@@radiacia_3511 *LAUGHS IN UKRAINE PROPAGANDA* (Ukraine air defence missiles, tanks, artillery, HIMARS, bridges and electric are subjects related to Russian military risks Read all war related doctrines carefully)
@@radiacia_3511 Even the russians are complaining their commanders arent using the doctrine. Theres a few of them who say its in the regulations though noone seems to have read them.
Carpenter Brut - Looking for Tracy Tzu. Товарищ Маузер, вам выпишут Ленинскую премию, если следующее видео будет под Invasion A.D. того же Брюта, тем более, что он сам под него пускал нарезку из "Red Dawn" (если мне не изменяет память), что более чем било по атмосфере. И вообще, больше Наступающего Красного Шторма, хорошего и разного.
@@lordtritus2261 Haven't seen Russia manage to pull off a single proper combined arms assault during the whole war, and not for the lack of trying. They just fail at coordinating and try to make up for it with mass and tenacity...which usually ends the same way as for late-WW2 Germany.
Normaly only interested in german stuff and completely disinterested in anything russian or soviet, but i'll be damned if this wasnt absolutely a e s t h e t i c. Damn good job.
It is SOVIET army, comrade. If we say is the proletarian way to float, then ANY other way of floating is decadent, capitalist, bourgeois-revisionist floating.
@@taterater1052 Of course not. But NATO would use them first, if convinced a ground attack from the East were imminent. Nato never would, and never will, allow a first blow to come from the East.
@@Grimenoughtomaketherobotcry Are you talking about Ukraine? Because NATO isn’t sending cruise missiles just like that as a first response over Ukraine. If Russia were to invade NATO on the other hand, they would start with their own cruise missile barrage and launch air attacks first.
@@taterater1052 No, I'm not talking about Ukraine, at present at any rate, although I wouldn't rule out unilateral actions by individual Nato countries (namely the UK, France and Turkey) should their personnel be harmed by a Russian advance into Ukraine. That might then lead to the intervention of the US and the Nato alliance as a whole. This may have something to do with Putin withdrawing 10,000 troops away from the Ukraine border. But I'm sure that was just because the "exercises" had concluded...
О, спасибо. От себя добавлю, что вроде как показалось, заметил кадры то ли из "Родословная подвига" то ли из "Наследники победы". Склоняюсь больше к последнему, можете поправить, если говорю не так.
Actually, this shows the Red Army retreating back to the USSR, as their comrades in East Germany, Czechoslovakia and western Poland had just been vapourized.
The combined arms doctrine was all the forces working together to quickly gain large amounts of land. During ww2 up to that point, working with all the branches was hard to do, as each ran thier branch separately and it took much planning to work together. It could be argued that Russia was one of the first modern armies to have standardised items such as vehicles, weapons between the branches
In the comments above was said: This video uses newsreel footage from military exercises "Dnepr-67", from film "Such soldier is invincible" about military exercises "West-81" and footage from documentary about soviet airborne troops. Sorry for terrible engrish :)
1:36 Accumulating to compel their past and present legacy victorious of the "cobiyate" ("Soviet") while most mumbling to parade the past and present legacy of the "origin" stances of the first monarch government that was dismantled by the revolutionaries party of Late Lenin before the eruption of the world war 2. Field-Marshal Lt. Gen. Wango Yima Dima ( a permanent bloodline biologist and history navigator)
No. It's a video of the Soviet military ESCAPING Eastern Europe, which would be a glowing, green, irradiated wasteland the second SACEUR was convinced the Warsaw Pact was moving west. Ok, THREE seconds after.
@@barbarapitenthusiast7103 I'm not saying I'd LIKE it. Nevertheless, that's what would have happened (and might yet happen). And no one could be absolutely certain that a theatre nuclear war in central and eastern Europe west of the actual Soviet border would necessarily have led to a full exchange of strategic nuclear weapons. The Soviets were quite prepared to let Europe burn, and weren't shy about pointing it out to western European leaders. Both the US and the USSR intended to keep any conflict confined to Europe and keep their own homelands out of it for as long as possible. Tactical/theatre nuclear war in Europe has always posed a greater threat than a full scale strategic exchange, both during the Cold War and today.
Hardly. They'd have been vapourized the second SACEUR was convinced that an attack was IMMINENT, BEFORE they started to attack. Why do you think the US never renounced the first use of nuclear weapons, especially the use of tactical nukes in Europe? And then there's the French, who would be quite happy to turn everything east of the inter-German border into an irradiated lake of fire the second the Warsaw Pact moved west. And the British would deal with anything left over.
Absolute shame this footage will never conjure the same feeling as it did just a year ago. Legacy of the Red Army completely ruined by a war hungry dictator
3:30 Everybody capitalist 'til the train starts crossing the pontoon bridge.
😂😂😂
After watching this video, where do I sign up for the next frontline?
3:30 This is the most badass thing i have ever seen in my life
i had no idea trains could pontoon.
Fucking blew my mind.
When you are preparing for a war the most completely insane things could happen
SAME
About what?
I swear everything the Soviets built could swim!
While Germans build fucking U-boats
If it didn't swim, it would just keep driving to the other side!
Well, precisely. Because all Soviet vehicles were fine-tuned for an offensive war in Europe, and Europe has so many rivers.
@@jurisprudens Entire Belorussia is just Big Fucking Swamp. Before invading Europe soviet army had to somehow get to the other end of swamp.
Actually you right
Being able to move a locomotive over like that at 3:30 is impressive as fuck
The Soviet Army on its height of glory and might
:)))
:Hello người ae :)
and the gulag
@@burnt_frog least brainwashed westoid
@missile101 Sure, at least they didn't have slave labour like in the us to day (inmates work for nothing or almost nothing).
Я много чего видел, но что бы пантонный мост паровоз с вагонами переезжал, такого я еще не видел.
You don´t need bridges if you have sufficient numbers of BMP´s and BTR´s
Fuck you're right.
Technically yes, but then you're limited to mechanized and motorized infantry without heavy armor support, and the artillery is going to get left behind, as well as a lot of logistics is done via non-amphibious trucks. That's why bridges are important, for the heavier stuff.
@@michaelthayer5351 actually, the Warsaw Pact military was made so 90%+ of the ground vehicles would have the ability to cross waters even without bridges, as a matter of fact, this goes even for logistics, artillery support, anti-aircraft defense, tanks, and MBTs. (The snorkel tube on the majority of Soviet tanks, you can see it mostly on the turrets)
Yes, it is definitely harder and slower thus less effective, as a result though, it was and is better than nothing and something unique that the opposition side did not have in such a number.
Some examples of Soviet vehicles with water crossing ability are:
BMP family AFVs
BTR family AFVs
MT-LB universal carriers (this includes even logistic versions)
T- tank family Medium/Main battle tanks (from T-54 up to T-80s and T-72s)
Gvozdika SPG
9K33 Osa SAMS
...
(Some vehicles needed further preparation in order to cross the waters such as the T- tank family vehicles, but most of them were prepared for such events 24/7)
Remember that tanks can go trough water too
Seems that Michael Thayer's point has been lost on people.
Some of those cruiser weapons are in a small park in Norfolk Naval Shipyard. Freaking awesome.
Soviet armed forces is the greatest army of world history. Thanks from Bangladesh to help in our liberation war of 1971 against Pakistan.
🇧🇩🇷🇺
As always mauzer outstanding work!
This video made me want to play Wargames Red Dragon again.
What is dead can never die
Great work as always. Looking forward to your future work man.
Wow u included everything......loved this one.....(also mig-25😍 and su-7 ..)
Actually the Soviet offensive strategy is outstanding though they never used it but India used it extensively in 71 bangladesh liberation war
*LAUGHS IN UKRAINE WAR*
@@radiacia_3511 *LAUGHS IN UKRAINE PROPAGANDA*
(Ukraine air defence missiles, tanks, artillery, HIMARS, bridges and electric are subjects related to Russian military risks
Read all war related doctrines carefully)
@@radiacia_3511 Even the russians are complaining their commanders arent using the doctrine. Theres a few of them who say its in the regulations though noone seems to have read them.
Thats one big F
what strategy?
Russian plane:
General: how many para troupers can you load?
Russian plane: yes
Carpenter Brut - Looking for Tracy Tzu.
Товарищ Маузер, вам выпишут Ленинскую премию, если следующее видео будет под Invasion A.D. того же Брюта, тем более, что он сам под него пускал нарезку из "Red Dawn" (если мне не изменяет память), что более чем било по атмосфере.
И вообще, больше Наступающего Красного Шторма, хорошего и разного.
это даже не ремейк, а сиквел. Маузер достоин УВОЖЕНИЯ
How is it possible that you have 60 thousand subscribers and the video has 80 thousand views? You're a master mauzer
Soviet is the collective, russia is merely a part of it with vast areas of land but the slavs are the soviets key to success
Magnificent...well done
Bravo
I wish that there was an entire movie in your style of videos!
The best part of this is the steam train.
This is the only video on youtube that shows a train crossing a pontoon.
3:30 unbelievable!!
As a T-34 M1943 I am obligated to say this. SOVYETSKY SOYUZ!!!
i am lovin it❤️❤️
Epic
Просто охуительные нарезки под охуительную музыку. Подписка)
your channel is underrated
I like it so much, i hope you will upload more video like this
Красиво и Мощно
This sounds like something from phantom of the opera
вот вся мощь Советской Армии, аж вода из берегов выходит !!!
Ох годнота!
Video: *4:20** minutes long*
Me: *nice*
The idea of combined arms warfare is much more recent than most people think. Some countries are still on the fence about using it too.
Russia, for example...
@@HistoryGameVUkraine, for example...
@@lordtritus2261 one doesn't have the capabilities, the other not the equipment, yes.
@@HistoryGameV One can make them, the other needs donations. While both know how to use them.
@@lordtritus2261 Haven't seen Russia manage to pull off a single proper combined arms assault during the whole war, and not for the lack of trying. They just fail at coordinating and try to make up for it with mass and tenacity...which usually ends the same way as for late-WW2 Germany.
How The Hell Did You Find Such Good Footage With Good Quality? Like How.
this made me play team Yankee again as the soviets and collect cold war hats uniforms and helmets!
The soviets took artillery guns for a swim. Wow 🤩
There's an old North American saying about how doing something easy or simple is like, "shooting ducks in water."
Normaly only interested in german stuff and completely disinterested in anything russian or soviet, but i'll be damned if this wasnt absolutely a e s t h e t i c. Damn good job.
If your arms and legs are crossed.
*Combined limbs*
2:26 I don't think that's how floating works
It is SOVIET army, comrade. If we say is the proletarian way to float, then ANY other way of floating is decadent, capitalist, bourgeois-revisionist floating.
Nice video
Strength in numbers.
Yes. The USAF says the same of its tactical nukes.
Well done. Is there a SAM themed video on your channel?
👍
Amazing shit
Not to a land, sea or air launched cruise missile, it isn't.
@@Grimenoughtomaketherobotcry We’re not the only ones with cruise missiles lol.
@@taterater1052 Of course not. But NATO would use them first, if convinced a ground attack from the East were imminent. Nato never would, and never will, allow a first blow to come from the East.
@@Grimenoughtomaketherobotcry Are you talking about Ukraine? Because NATO isn’t sending cruise missiles just like that as a first response over Ukraine. If Russia were to invade NATO on the other hand, they would start with their own cruise missile barrage and launch air attacks first.
@@taterater1052 No, I'm not talking about Ukraine, at present at any rate, although I wouldn't rule out unilateral actions by individual Nato countries (namely the UK, France and Turkey) should their personnel be harmed by a Russian advance into Ukraine. That might then lead to the intervention of the US and the Nato alliance as a whole. This may have something to do with Putin withdrawing 10,000 troops away from the Ukraine border. But I'm sure that was just because the "exercises" had concluded...
Its been interesting seeing carpenter brut show up in more and more vids
2:43 somone almost drown
Where do you find this footage I've been looking around everywhere to find stuff like this
@Mauzer can you tell me where you got the footage of the soviet marines landing on the beach?
Каеф
Очень ретровейвна
4:20
Red Army Swag confirmed
Ну,Советское,вы,очень,любите!Я,тоже!
Итак, узнаю кадры из "Такой солдат непобедим" и "Учения Днепр-67". А если не секрет, какие еще видео использовались в ролике?
О, спасибо. От себя добавлю, что вроде как показалось, заметил кадры то ли из "Родословная подвига" то ли из "Наследники победы". Склоняюсь больше к последнему, можете поправить, если говорю не так.
0:31 Didthat bridge just collapse??
Pontoon bridge, made of several floating parts, it didn't collapse, it bended
@@MehrunesKar Wait til the shock wave from the US tactical nuke hits it!
Советская армия готовилась сражаться, а сейчас...
Сделайте видео про Японию во ВМВ.
Red are coming!
Actually, this shows the Red Army retreating back to the USSR, as their comrades in East Germany, Czechoslovakia and western Poland had just been vapourized.
Пик советской армии
Great music! What type of genre is this?
Sintwave
Where is your profile picture from
Brish: lol soviets have no boats they weak!!
Soviet: *all this ground army cans easily swim like modern boats* 🗿yeah..
Some of it may be utter crap, some it it may be mysteriously missing critical components. All of it looks sexy.
They seem to have forgotten how to do this or they were all just show and no go .
I thought the only legendary combined arms was at the castle itter
The combined arms doctrine was all the forces working together to quickly gain large amounts of land. During ww2 up to that point, working with all the branches was hard to do, as each ran thier branch separately and it took much planning to work together. It could be argued that Russia was one of the first modern armies to have standardised items such as vehicles, weapons between the branches
ℂ𝕆𝕄𝔹𝕀ℕ𝔼𝔻 𝔸ℝ𝕄𝕊
What are those tanks at 0:6?
T72
Red Army😨😨😨😨
I think it's biggest Cold War Communist military training at 1987. Correct me if I am wrong.
In the comments above was said:
This video uses newsreel footage from military exercises "Dnepr-67", from film "Such soldier is invincible" about military exercises "West-81" and footage from documentary about soviet airborne troops.
Sorry for terrible engrish :)
@@LeningradetZ Thanks, I didn't new, and nobody English is perfect, so don't esxuse.
А что за музыка?
Carpenter Brut - Looking for Tracy Tzu
Работают так же слаженно, как часовой механизм
1:36 Accumulating to compel their past and present legacy victorious of the "cobiyate" ("Soviet") while most mumbling to parade the past and present legacy of the "origin" stances of the first monarch government that was dismantled by the revolutionaries party of Late Lenin before the eruption of the world war 2.
Field-Marshal Lt. Gen. Wango Yima Dima ( a permanent bloodline biologist and history navigator)
waaaait, that's combined armies, not combined arms per se :p
Do you remember that it was not the USSR that started the Cold War, but Mr. Churchill and Mr. Truman in 1946 because of envy of the Communists
🇮🇳💧🌄💧🤖🌅 3:50
Can t54 swim??
No. Those tanks are equipped for underwater driving.
It is a video of the Soviet military invading Western Europe
No. It's a video of the Soviet military ESCAPING Eastern Europe, which would be a glowing, green, irradiated wasteland the second SACEUR was convinced the Warsaw Pact was moving west. Ok, THREE seconds after.
@@Grimenoughtomaketherobotcry if ww3 would have happened you would be playing real life Fallout in washington DC
@@barbarapitenthusiast7103 I'm not saying I'd LIKE it. Nevertheless, that's what would have happened (and might yet happen). And no one could be absolutely certain that a theatre nuclear war in central and eastern Europe west of the actual Soviet border would necessarily have led to a full exchange of strategic nuclear weapons. The Soviets were quite prepared to let Europe burn, and weren't shy about pointing it out to western European leaders. Both the US and the USSR intended to keep any conflict confined to Europe and keep their own homelands out of it for as long as possible. Tactical/theatre nuclear war in Europe has always posed a greater threat than a full scale strategic exchange, both during the Cold War and today.
трепещите враги
Hardly. They'd have been vapourized the second SACEUR was convinced that an attack was IMMINENT, BEFORE they started to attack. Why do you think the US never renounced the first use of nuclear weapons, especially the use of tactical nukes in Europe? And then there's the French, who would be quite happy to turn everything east of the inter-German border into an irradiated lake of fire the second the Warsaw Pact moved west. And the British would deal with anything left over.
@@Grimenoughtomaketherobotcry because Americans are afraid of an asymmetrical answer
But the answer may not be asymmetrical, but much more significant
Soviet destroyed in first round of cold war. Now russian is fighting with USA in New cold war. actuall( Soviet , russia)is nothing with out KGB
Ý ông nội sao ?
At least we skipped this war
u should remove that .mp4
i think it adds to the video
Repost without the fake video and film degradation effects?
Old media could look good, that's part of retro too!
O4v,3248 3:22 ,.🇮🇳🌅🌄💧 0:40
Mrw this is all soviet footage but then the Russians can't manage combined arms in 2022
Combined Arms also needs sufficient participation of an airforce. Something Ukraine hasn't been able to even resemble for at least 6-8 months.
Absolute shame this footage will never conjure the same feeling as it did just a year ago. Legacy of the Red Army completely ruined by a war hungry dictator
oh no too bad russian army is weak o man thats it i might well just have to proceed with the zog world order shit now dont we
..selbst das Filmmaterial wurde geklaut ...
alle krautzone leser versammeln sich jetzt hier
God Bless The Ukraine.
God doesn’t bless Nazis
Propaganda video
Слава СА СССР! Вот когда надо было растоптать нато когда были на пике могущества!
👍