U.S. Pacific Fleet: 200 ships, 160,000 sailors and 1,500 aircraft

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 53

  • @fraserconnell21
    @fraserconnell21 Рік тому +23

    Admiral Paparo gave better answers to great direct questions than any politician I've ever suffered listening to. Great job, Zavier

  • @xaviervavasseur8616
    @xaviervavasseur8616 Рік тому +22

    It was really great to meet with ADM Paparo 👍 Impressive number of sailors and assets !
    🇺🇲🤝🇫🇷

  • @TheRailfan32
    @TheRailfan32 Рік тому +10

    awesome interview. Thank You, Sir!

  • @Trump20-24years
    @Trump20-24years Рік тому +1

    these are the type of men i would give my life for. God bless Admiral Paparo and God bless the United States.

  • @goodvibesphilippines5489
    @goodvibesphilippines5489 Рік тому +9

    Admiral Paparo commands a lot of offensive and defensive power.

  • @tylerclayton6081
    @tylerclayton6081 Рік тому +3

    The US Pacific fleet alone dwarfs the entire British Royal Navy which has only 30,000 total naval personnel. The pacific fleet by itself has over 160,000 total naval personnel

  • @alexis_ian
    @alexis_ian Рік тому

    1:43 First time to know, the US Pacific Fleet consists of 60% of the USN ships, submarines, and aircraft. I always assume the US Fleet Forces (Aka: Atlantic Fleet) to have a larger percentage of the USN fleet.

  • @werewolf5674
    @werewolf5674 Рік тому +11

    The fighting force first to engage China.

    • @PapaOscarNovember
      @PapaOscarNovember Рік тому

      And the last force to engage China since nuclear missile subs are included.

  • @johnelliott7375
    @johnelliott7375 Рік тому +2

    God bless you all, your going to need it because when it goes hot your going to be a busy man and I hope that you are able to get the back up, support, logistics, and replacement ships, aircraft, plus the sailors that you are going to need when China tries and they will test and attack you and your Allies.

  • @rcbuck04
    @rcbuck04 Рік тому +3

    AMERICA #1

  • @ms-lazuli7435
    @ms-lazuli7435 Рік тому +2

    Oooh mais que vois--je ???? L'Hermione, ma petite frégate !

  • @johnelliott7375
    @johnelliott7375 Рік тому

    Don't Forget about the others that served as always happens. "The Bull" Admiral Halsey and many many more. The Leyte Gulf battle, I want to say that I am not sure anymore but Johnson who took on the force that snuck up on the Navy when the Halsey went he went chasing empty ships and he sacrificed him and his ship to stop them from destroying the other task force that had to take on losing odds because of Halsey and his empty carriers.

  • @Thomas-gz4ky
    @Thomas-gz4ky Рік тому +2

    The largest Air Force in the world is the US Air Force . The
    Second largest air force is the
    US Navy. The US Marine Corps
    is not far behind. Think about that .

  • @chepey
    @chepey Рік тому +1

    I think it's just slightly larger than the Royal Malaysian Navy

    • @dp70939
      @dp70939 Рік тому

      How?You mean no. of ships or sailors?But remember an aircraft carrier is just counted as one ship.

    • @tylerclayton6081
      @tylerclayton6081 Рік тому +2

      @@dp70939 he’s being sarcastic. It’s way way larger than the Malaysian navy in every way and every metric.
      The US Pacific fleet alone dwarfs the entire British Royal Navy which has only 30,000 total naval personnel. The pacific fleet by itself has over 160,000 total naval personnel

  • @tylerclayton6081
    @tylerclayton6081 Рік тому

    The US Pacific alone would still be the largest Navy in the world by tonnage of ships and number of Navy Personnel

  • @maritesalmazar2517
    @maritesalmazar2517 Рік тому

    Is he has a vice admiral?

  • @yashkumar3196
    @yashkumar3196 Рік тому

    What is America and France doing in Asia???

    • @tylerclayton6081
      @tylerclayton6081 Рік тому +1

      Providing security over the global shipping lanes. Making sure nobody tries to claim international waters as their own sovereign territory in order to control key shipping lanes or trade routes.
      The same thing we’ve been doing since world war 2 which is why global trade has boomed since WW2

    • @yashkumar3196
      @yashkumar3196 Рік тому

      @@tylerclayton6081 and that's a lie 😂

    • @yashkumar3196
      @yashkumar3196 Рік тому

      @@tylerclayton6081 should china built a naval base and airbase in Mexico to protect its shipping lanes????

    • @adlerzwei
      @adlerzwei Рік тому

      @@yashkumar3196 Let them try. :D

    • @adlerzwei
      @adlerzwei Рік тому

      Keeping the world safe from terrorists and dictators.

  • @isidrovalidajr7137
    @isidrovalidajr7137 Рік тому +1

    🌎🌍🌏BOBOY VALIDA🌎🌍🌏🇵🇭💪🦅😇🇵🇸💪🦅😇🇺🇸💪🦅😇🇲🇽💪🦅😇🇦🇷💪🦅😇🇨🇦💪🦅😇🇬🇱💪🦅😇🇮🇸💪🦅😇NORTH AMERICA CENTRAL AMERICA SOUTH AMERICA ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES🇮🇷💪🦅😇🇹🇷💪🦅😇🇮🇶💪🦅😇🇸🇾💪🦅😇🇱🇧💪🦅😇🇪🇬💪🦅😇🇱🇾💪🦅😇🇩🇪💪🦅😇🇮🇹💪🦅😇🇫🇮💪🦅😇🇸🇪💪🦅😇🇳🇴💪🦅😇🇷🇺💪🦅😇ASEAN💪🦅😇

  • @dutch6390
    @dutch6390 Рік тому

    💪 🇨🇵 👍

  • @mosesgoldbergshekelstien1520

    why does he say "rules based world order" and not international law? is it because America is constantly violating international law and the "threats" aren't violating international law?

    • @tylerclayton6081
      @tylerclayton6081 Рік тому

      Many countries around the world violate international law on a regular basis. China violates international law inside and outside of it’s borders a whole lot more often than the USA. Humanitarian laws are also international laws (referencing the Uighur genocide)
      I don’t know why some people act like the US is somehow worse than China. America is morally best superpower we can hope for
      Under American hegemony the world has been way more peaceful and more prosperous than any period before in history. A multipolar world will just create more conflict and wars

    • @StereoSpace
      @StereoSpace 7 місяців тому

      Maybe pass on the vodka for breakfast for a change, eh Dmitri?

  • @ImpermanNorth
    @ImpermanNorth Рік тому

    Rules based order🎉😢 no Mas. No one scared of you anymore.

    • @StereoSpace
      @StereoSpace 7 місяців тому

      Didn't Russia recently lose control of the Black Sea to a country with no navy? In fact, that country just sank about 1/4 of your navy, didn't they?

  • @stern729
    @stern729 Рік тому

    One Russian tactical nuclear warhead.
    And everything.
    And there are no more American fleets and ships.

    • @factstruth8007
      @factstruth8007 Рік тому +4

      What about Moscow when we hit back....

    • @StereoSpace
      @StereoSpace 7 місяців тому +1

      @@factstruth8007 People like that rarely consider the consequences of their actions. After the consequences, they'll blame everyone but themselves.

  • @fcccabrera3371
    @fcccabrera3371 2 місяці тому

    All is good until the Chinese Navy is involved, than the Pacific fleet is nowhere to be found, ask the Philippine Navy that, NO US assistance to be found. Funny how talk is cheap, the Philippine Navy was being attached by the Chinese, Admiral where were our allies? All talk