That hemisphere optical turret is really interesting and seems like such an awesome system. Seems like optical guidance and threat detection even as just a backup is important and to have a big sphere on one turret seems efficient. I hope the US Navy puts them on each ship.
Hey don't laugh lol. The navy is looking at an Antarctic support/ southern ocean patrol ship. Also time the Mk 46 torpedo was replaced. The armies Mistal and the 105mm howitzers are getting long in the teeth. I believe they also want to replace the Pinzgauer trucks. The navy needs to start thinking about the Frigate replacement. The services have $NZ10 billion to spend this decade on toys.
Xavier, tellement impeccablement coiffé et _so french_ qu'on a l'impression qu'à chaque fois qu'il porte le micro à ses lèvres il va entonner d'une voix grave un splendide _"I did it my way"._ Normal que les américains l'aient à la bonne, héhé.
Naval group is not high tech ,Fincantieri and Leonardo now they the top in Europe, but the baguette the leadership is ever french...also porfume, escargot, dick for anal hole
Questions for Patriots on a Mk 41 VLS and or Mk 70 mobile delivery system. 1) How many Patriot PAC 3 MSE missiles with a diameter of 11 inches can be fitted per single VLS cell? can it be quad fitted? 2) Not sure if this is true or not or if this version of Patriot is being tested or offered but how many Patriot PAC 3 missiles with a diameter of only 10 inches can be fitted per single VLS cell? can it be quad fitted? (Note: ESSM has a diameter of 10 inches and can be quad fitted) is this missile version being offered?
The rim-162 ESSM (evolved sea sparrow) is only a short to medium range air defense missile which is not capable of ballistic missile defense. The mim-104 Patriot is an anti ballistic missile defense system.
It would be as capable (if not more capable) against ballistic missile threats than the SM-6 and there's a potential to quad pack the PAC-3 ERINT/CRI or dual pack the MSE for increased missile load.
The PAC-3s have been tested against more capable ballistic missile test targets than the SM-6. Plus the altitude control motors of the PAC-3 would give it better post-burn pH and the HTK warhead would be better at destroying ballistic missiles.
@@Just_A_Random_Desk In no way is it better, not in range, payload, kill vehicle, or engagement envelope, or variety. it is a MUCH smaller and shorter ranged weapon, and cheap compared to SM-6. They are not in the same class by any metric whatsoever.
Capacity. Plenty of Patriot missiles produced with a fast production line, while SM missiles will run out relatively quickly if a serious war pops off that would include defense of aircraft carriers
SeaRam has its own radar and optical system. The larger launcher box must be integrated with the ship's radar. I don't know if the ship's radar can integrate with the system. I don't ever recall seeing the larger launcher box on a US DDG or CG.
We have thousands of Patriot missiles in stock with another 500+ per year being produced, as mentioned in the video, which will help capacity issues that exist with SM missiles. Probably are as many existing Patriot missiles as there are for all varieties of SM missiles.
Do we really need frigates? Feels like having more destroyers, super carriers & subs would be better since we never seem to have enough of them and they are the most important ones to have.
A Destroyer, super carrier, or a sub is in no way proper for use of what a Frigate is for. There is also a practical number for the carriers that can be supported. The Frigates allow the rest of the Destroyer fleet to not be wasted on low end assignments. As for subs those have a very different mission and don't overlap with Frigate missions.
Nope. This is the main job of the military industrial complex and the military and although America has a lot responsibilities defending partners and shipping lanes, America is also the largest economy in the world and leader of many sectors
Does my country, the Republic of Indonesia, have ordered warships from your company?  Does my country, the Republic of Indonesia, have ordered warships from your company?
I can't say enough about the awful awful spokesman for AAC, or thales, peddling the CAPTAS-4, just an incompetent sent by the organization. It doesn't say much for AAC, it seems almost like it's an MIC shell corp, nothing more, made solely to comply with US laws. This spokesman raises concerns in my mind that AAC may not be that competent of an organization. We will be watching their performance closely.
In a shooting war against China, US ships will be running out of missiles while Chinese ones are just getting started. The US relies on numbers of ships, Chinese on number of missiles per ship. The Chinese are liable to launch swarms of missiles against US ships from various directions and launch platforms.
That hemisphere optical turret is really interesting and seems like such an awesome system. Seems like optical guidance and threat detection even as just a backup is important and to have a big sphere on one turret seems efficient. I hope the US Navy puts them on each ship.
0:21 NZ at a naval expo is the funniest thing I've seen all year, its like window shopping.
Hey don't laugh lol. The navy is looking at an Antarctic support/ southern ocean patrol ship. Also time the Mk 46 torpedo was replaced. The armies Mistal and the 105mm howitzers are getting long in the teeth. I believe they also want to replace the Pinzgauer trucks. The navy needs to start thinking about the Frigate replacement. The services have $NZ10 billion to spend this decade on toys.
Xavier, tellement impeccablement coiffé et _so french_ qu'on a l'impression qu'à chaque fois qu'il porte le micro à ses lèvres il va entonner d'une voix grave un splendide _"I did it my way"._
Normal que les américains l'aient à la bonne, héhé.
Naval group is not high tech ,Fincantieri and Leonardo now they the top in Europe, but the baguette the leadership is ever french...also porfume, escargot, dick for anal hole
@@valerianocuomo996 Please seek medical help.
Captas-4 will also be in the new Spanish Navy F110.
"Tal-less"?! Man, have I been saying it wrong.
Gotta get those epic sonar systems on everything we can before 2027!
A navalised Patriot. Interesting.
I was wondering when that would happen.
Semi submercible U-boat sailing boat Gizmo style... Hoist the mast and the colors!
Questions for Patriots on a Mk 41 VLS and or Mk 70 mobile delivery system.
1) How many Patriot PAC 3 MSE missiles with a diameter of 11 inches can be fitted per single VLS cell? can it be quad fitted?
2) Not sure if this is true or not or if this version of Patriot is being tested or offered but how many Patriot PAC 3 missiles with a diameter of only 10 inches can be fitted per single VLS cell? can it be quad fitted? (Note: ESSM has a diameter of 10 inches and can be quad fitted) is this missile version being offered?
I still can’t get my head around the fact that the FFG 62 class doesn’t have a hull mounted sonar..
Pretty crazy right? When you think about it, it's actually smart and not needed. The only drawback is the time it takes to deploy it.
French frigates recently won an ASW award from the USN, and they deploy the CAPTAS sonar. Apparently, the USN was very impressed with it.
I like it for Lockheed Martin. 🖊️
Looks like the bow section has seen another design change again. A raised bulwark like the Perry’s had.
So how does navalized Patriot compare with Evolved Sea Sparrow?
The rim-162 ESSM (evolved sea sparrow) is only a short to medium range air defense missile which is not capable of ballistic missile defense. The mim-104 Patriot is an anti ballistic missile defense system.
I don't understand the point of a navalised Patriot.
It’s a potential way for LM to make money.
It would be as capable (if not more capable) against ballistic missile threats than the SM-6 and there's a potential to quad pack the PAC-3 ERINT/CRI or dual pack the MSE for increased missile load.
What makes sense is to use one missile on land and sea.
@@RainKing048
What about an SM-3/Aster-30/ESSM (or CAMM) combination?
The presumption is that SM has been in the calculus of adversaries. adding the patriot would add another layer to the "onion" of AD
Any advantages of the Patriot PAC-3 missiles over the Standard Missiles?
Nothing
The PAC-3s have been tested against more capable ballistic missile test targets than the SM-6. Plus the altitude control motors of the PAC-3 would give it better post-burn pH and the HTK warhead would be better at destroying ballistic missiles.
@@RainKing048 Patriot 3 is a medium ranged system that would compete with ESSM, not SM-6. 40 km versus hundreds for the SM-6.
Midrange, slots in between the ESSM and SM-6.
@@the5gen that's the job of upgraded SM-2, right?
Pac 3 navalized for what exactly, already have sm 2 and 6
iirc PAC 3 is slightly better than SM-6
Competition and variety 💰
@@Just_A_Random_Desk In no way is it better, not in range, payload, kill vehicle, or engagement envelope, or variety. it is a MUCH smaller and shorter ranged weapon, and cheap compared to SM-6. They are not in the same class by any metric whatsoever.
An alterative to ESSM for protection against hypersonic SSMs.
Capacity. Plenty of Patriot missiles produced with a fast production line, while SM missiles will run out relatively quickly if a serious war pops off that would include defense of aircraft carriers
How come the animation showed a SeaRAM rather than full 22 rd RAM launcher? Are they cutting costs already?
SeaRam has its own radar and optical system. The larger launcher box must be integrated with the ship's radar. I don't know if the ship's radar can integrate with the system.
I don't ever recall seeing the larger launcher box on a US DDG or CG.
Where does the PAC-3N fit in compared to SM-2, 3 and 6?
Good question. But will say sm3 is more of an anti-ballistic missile. But I don’t understand the gaps not filled by sm2 and essm more specifically.
We have thousands of Patriot missiles in stock with another 500+ per year being produced, as mentioned in the video, which will help capacity issues that exist with SM missiles.
Probably are as many existing Patriot missiles as there are for all varieties of SM missiles.
THALÈS !!! The French Power 💪 🇨🇵 👍
Do we really need frigates? Feels like having more destroyers, super carriers & subs would be better since we never seem to have enough of them and they are the most important ones to have.
A Destroyer, super carrier, or a sub is in no way proper for use of what a Frigate is for. There is also a practical number for the carriers that can be supported. The Frigates allow the rest of the Destroyer fleet to not be wasted on low end assignments. As for subs those have a very different mission and don't overlap with Frigate missions.
These are big, heavily armed frigates. You could classify them as light destroyers.
No money no talk.
crazy country, this is the main job of the US.
Nope. This is the main job of the military industrial complex and the military and although America has a lot responsibilities defending partners and shipping lanes, America is also the largest economy in the world and leader of many sectors
Does my country, the Republic of Indonesia, have ordered warships from your company?

Does my country, the Republic of Indonesia, have ordered warships from your company?
I'm guessing it's more for air wing defense more than anything
7:35 is this a ship for ants? how can the sailors deploy to sea if they cant even fit on the boat?
Smaller crews
Drones will be able to take those out
MIC
I can't say enough about the awful awful spokesman for AAC, or thales, peddling the CAPTAS-4, just an incompetent sent by the organization. It doesn't say much for AAC, it seems almost like it's an MIC shell corp, nothing more, made solely to comply with US laws. This spokesman raises concerns in my mind that AAC may not be that competent of an organization. We will be watching their performance closely.
Why they always buying stuff that only hold less missiles
In a shooting war against China, US ships will be running out of missiles while Chinese ones are just getting started. The US relies on numbers of ships, Chinese on number of missiles per ship. The Chinese are liable to launch swarms of missiles against US ships from various directions and launch platforms.
Tous les français ne maîtrisent pas la langue de Shakespeare, alors une traduction en français serait la bienvenue...
Ils font bien souvent une vidéo en Anglais et en Français, peut-être y en aura-t-il une en Français.
Leave ship design to BAE please
BAE? It' a JOKE? laisse les vrais Pros comme Thales ou LM faire le vrai travail de l'avenir de nos défenses surtout la marine😂
Bring back BUSHIPS
That lots of sucks I seen one that had over 36 missiles on it and it was brown but nobody wanted to buy it and it was on wheels