The Scandinavian peoples call each other "broderfolk". A very apt description. With all the feelings of community and rivalry. We would never accept any of the other Scandinavians to rule over us. 😁
“Everything will be OK, if the other guys just shut up and do what we say.” The best way to reunite the Kalmar union is if somebody shits the bed so hard, that everyone in the old Kalmar union agrees we dislike that guy more than the old Kalmarites.
2:19 You misunderstood the reason for the Wars. Both Denmark and Sweden wanted to recreate the Union, just with slightly different views of which Royal House and Capital it should have.
On the topic of Denmark and Sweden, I would say. We are separated only by a canel and a thousand years of wars, and connected only by a bridge and 1000 Years of Brotherhood.
I would be in favour of a unification of the Nordic countries. I think we should go for the South African solution for capitals though, having multiple capital cities. I also think language-wise the best solution would be to just keep the current system largely, since pretty much everyone learns a continental North Germanic language in school already. We'd just have to get better at teaching some of the other ones to increase mutual intelligibility, more exposure. Perhaps those of us speaking a continental North Germanic language natively should learn at least some Finnish as well. In the end though there are several hurdles to overcome before this would ever happen, many of them economical. For Norway joining the EU for example is not really an option due to fishing and especially agriculture. It's so difficult and expensive to farm in Norway that it requires considerable government subsidies, so in a union for a "fair" market that would all be gone.
There's a definite kinship that could be cultivated even more in this idea. I'm sure the autonomy issues would rear their heads pretty soon though. But a fun vision indeed. Well done.
Not necessarily, if you check the parties in at least Swedish, Finnish, Norwegian and Danish parliament 8 of them (and that is most or all) do have a close or rather close sister party in the other countries so if they just merged over the former borders with their sister parties fast enough that wouldn't be a problem.
I think there exist no other neighboring countries in the history that have been fighting each other so thoroughly as 🇩🇰 🇸🇪. Shall we call this brother of love?❤
Like all neighboring countries? However most needed up with one swallow the other. We have now understood it’s better to cooperate with siblings than fighting. At the time it was kings fighting for their power, the people found it really hard to kill their siblings just because some kings told them so. Maybe that’s why we have the strongest democracy in the world now, never again forced to kill our friends.
Especially since you released that on Germany's reunification day I can say: Easier said than done. Germany was divided for 45 years, together now again for 32 and... well, Facebook relationship status would be "it's complicated" ;)
A Kalmar Union sounds like a great idea. I hope they do it. 👍💡The Scandinavian countries all have a high quality of life and wise governments. There is power in joining forces.
@@gitakumari1098 They could view the monarchs like state governors in the USA. The monarchs would represent their specific region within the union when they go to charitable events.
@@thomasengdahl6719 Tror du, de har mere til fælles med hinanden nu. Der er store forskelle mellem de tidligere Kalmar-lande og resten af nutidens moderne verden. Skandinaviske lande er mindre korrupte og forstår vigtigheden af socialisme for at skabe et velfungerende miljø for erhvervslivet.
Btw i saw the "Margrete den første" movie in the theater, and it was really good, the history i knew was brief so it did a great job teaching a little and making me look up the history later on.
Strictly speaking, Margaret I was not queen. She was Regent (in Denmark) on behalf of her son and Queen-consort (in Norway and Sweden), but not queen in her own right. She definitely deserved it, and when Margaret II of Denmark ascended the Thone, she chose to be “II” to celebrate her predecessor.
The Kalmar Union is not totally abollished - that is what keeps the Faroe Islands (which was part of Norway) and Denmark together. Some legislation intended for Norway only - parts of king Christian 5. Norwegian law from 1683 is still in effect in the Faroe Islands.
I don't think uniqueness would break the mold, we do share alot of history. And even if it were to become 1 country, such uniqueness would't be forgotten
Our cultures are more different than people from the outside see, after we have been at war with each other for more than a thousand years, we have found a model that works, good borders and lots of cooperation, but each our country and culture, everything else creates chaos, we don't want more wars, siblings don't live together as adults. We are strong when we cooperate, but would become weak if we were to be foolish enough to try to become a unit, there would be far too many infighting.
@@dallesamllhals9161 Much worse, no other countries in the world has had as many wars with each other as the Danes and the Swedes, now we have peace and both parties want to keep it.We don't want to rock the boat.
Fascinating piece, but I would probably have spent a little bit of speculation that Greenland would not want to be in it so much. Over the years they've been working hard on trying to get more and more independence from Denmark. I believe they are more inclined these days to consider themselves a North American country than a European one. (Which is logical.)
@@williamjones4716 Food is essential to get any work done, Denmark’s contribution cannot be understated. To this, add abundance of clean electricity as all Nordic countries and some oil as Norway. Also vacation goto for fantastic beaches and tourism. Most welcome! 💜
love the way you explain these history events :) interesting idea of a new kalmar union... not going to happen anytime soon. eurovision problems hahahahhahaaa
I thought your informative, and interesting idea sounded great, up until you mentioned scrapping "my" Swedish royal family. Then you mentioned Eurovision. No, Nope, won't happen! But I still really liked the video. 😃
Yes, it has to be a Nordic Union, with united but individual countries - not the United States of Norden, more like the European Union, in addition to the member countries.
You had me convinced, right up until Eurovision. LESS drama in my EUROVISION?! No, never, not gonna happen; Nordic unity is off the table permanently 😆 Jokes aside, with all the work the Nordic Council has accomplished over the years, the Nordics are closer knit now than they ever were during the Kalmar Union years. Apart from imports/exports and trade, you can pretty much just pull up your stakes, and move wherever you want to a much greater degree than even the EU framework allows. Also, disappointed you didn't mention Faroese fish exports 😜 If you've ever eaten high-end (aqua culture) salmon, it's most likely Faroese 😊
I live in Sweden. A nordic union is an interesting thought that I think have been lingering in the back of people's minds for a long time. If a serious proposition came to the table, I believe most swedes at least would say 'YES!' without any second thoughts or need to elaborations. Then, it would take decades to work out the details... The Kalmar union were no happy family but a necessity to counteract the german influence from the Deutsche Orden etc. It was more like a coup d' etat of three states by one royal family with connections to all three families going for the highest prize when chance and skilled politics gave the opportunity. After Sweden leaving, the remnants of the union still existed all the way to the days of Napoleon where Denmark kept it's stranglehold of Norway until it was decided by the powers to be in compensation to Sweden for the loss of the eastern part, now known as Finland, to the Russians which was initiated by Napoleon. The nordic countries today is partly a consequence of the Napoleon wars, which cause some of the tensions still existing between the countries as well. However, I believe we feel more in common with the other nordics than with the mainland europe all in all, and this becomes more evident the farther north you go. This is why a nordic union would be an alternative. However I doubt we are prepared to create a state out of that union at this moment, like the USA. A trade, defence, maybe a foreign politics union could be an option but I think we would like to keep some of our differences to avoid tension between our differences. A common nordic language? Sure, over time it would be a great benefit to us. Finland may beg to differ perhaps but they learn swedish at school and hate it, maybe they would embrace a 'nordic' language differently (as swedish is a bit controversial since the events of 1814). When would such a nordic union become a threat? I'm sure we would at least consider to involve the Baltics and then Russia would go totally bananas of course. Engaging the Baltics would eliminate the possibility of the 20th century attitude to wards Russia where the nordics are reluctantly but still open towards the Russian neighbour. We can't really do this passing by the Baltics but if they are on this train with us, the geopolitics change, the nordic situation will not be the same, the prerequisites changes dramatically. The Nordic council is already a kind of hazy, half-assed union in itself, we have certain benefits reserved within that nordic treaty already, the question is what we would gain or risk out of a deeper collaboration, and that might not be quite as obvious. I think it all comes down to if we as peoples of those countries would be attracted to the idea of a nordic empire or not. This is not far from the once Swedish dream of the Baltic as a Swedish inland sea during the 17th century. You could compare it to the mid-20th century idea Germany brought forth and how it comes to fruition within EU today. I doubt the other nordics would let that pass their eyesight. It certainly wouldn't pass by unnoticed by the leaders in Stockholm I'm sure, whatever they'll say about that. They would go to sleep with a boner just thinking about it even though it's out of line with the present official agenda.
Agreed. The Russian problem! If a Nordic nation was formed, how would Russia react to being trapped with no international waters out of the Baltic sea?
@@torbjrnhansen8521 It's getting closer already by the NATO applications by Sweden and Finland. From their point of view, they might have to react. I believe Sweden and Finland forgot the thin line they've walked for a long time, to their own benefit and to the opportunity to a peaceful relation with Russia. Sweden already had the nuclear retaliation guarantee from USA in exchange for ending it's own nuke program, NATO can't bring anything more, so there's other reasons than defence to the present NATO application. Finland is different, they have no secret deals, they live in the reality and needs trustworthy allies, instead of Sweden as their closest partner.
Dream on, guys, the Kalmar Union eventually failed the first time, it’s not going to succeed the second time. We are happy as sibling nations, but one family all together in one house? Nah, it’s ain’t gonna happen. Besides, Greenland dreams about independence. Not about a closer Anschluss to the the other Nordic countries. As for potential oil wealth in Greenland….well, lots of talk, lots of speculation, and lots of exploration, but the fact remains that not one drop of oil has actually been found in Greenland. Furthermore, the Greenland government is very iffy about any kind of oil drilling or mining due to the obvious pollution problems of such activities that invariably will be a threat to our traditional way of life in Greenland which involves hunting and fishing.
Let me correct a big misconception. A new Kalmar Union will consist of a Union of sovereign countries, where the most important thing will be trade. It will be called the Nordic Union. There will be several joint embassies where each country will be represented, this model exists in several countries already today. There will be a Nordic Song Competition that surpasses esc. Sports competitions and cultural activities. An expanded energy network and infrastructure. Countries such as the Baltic countries, Scotland, Ireland and the Netherlands will be included. And possibly also eventually New Zealand, Australia, Canada and Schleswig-Holstein.
A union would propably be a union of nations, like a mini-EU where every state keeps it's name and institutions, rather than a US like one country. Then royal families and Eurovision would be no problem at all. And sports... well, the UK lets every country compete in football as themselves... So, if the EU and/or NATO would collapse, maybe a nordic union would emerge... but more like a federation and not like a nation.
Right, you’ve already got it in name and principle with the Nordic Council so it wouldn’t take much to formalize things a bit farther for the other loose ends.
I see a new Kalmar Union being more of a Treaty organisation similar to Nato or EU, but able to prioritize Nordic ideals and progress. At most being similar to United States. With Turkey denying swedish entrance to NATO, having a Baltic/North Sea alliance localized to the Nordic regions, as well as loosely uniting their military (especially navy), they can ensure theyre own security and trade better than current disposition. One thing to note is if a Nordic Union formed, the Russian Baltic fleet would be completely outmatched. Currently it's capable of easily taking on any one or two of the Scandinavian countries in the Baltic. But united Russia doesn't stand a chance. Furthermore, I could see them acting as a single political entity in regards to foreign and military affairs, with combined army, Navy, and Air Force, but work completely independently in regard to domestic policy and governance. This would separate their reliance almost completely on larger, slower, more bureaucratic organisations like EU and NATO, able to react to shifts in economics and threats more readily.
We in the Nordics have had a military cooperation since a long time ago and Sweden and Finland have had an even closer relationship (was one of the reasons why we applied for NATO at the same time as we both join or not) then we in the Nordics have had many joint exercises over the years. Then we in Sweden have another name for the king who decided and it is Kristian Turran when you call him Kristion the Great. I saw that you will have elections soon and it might be interesting to hear your interpretation of the political parties you have in Denmark (I think it's confusing with your conservative party called Venstre as in Sweden we have the Vänsterpartiet (similar spelling to yours) which has its basis in the Communist Party) but it will not be a return to the time when no one wants to give up their right to determine their own country's path, but we have had cooperation since Sweden gave away Norway (they would vote to become part of Sweden again after 100 years but I can't find if it was even reached then it was clear who would win)
It's not that complicated "venstre" are called that because they were the left wing when we were a two chamber system back in the day (1849-1953) they just didn't change the Name when the actual left wing came arund... And btw "venstre" aren't conservative they are "liberale" (not the US version)... "højere" back in the day was the conservatives... Hope this clears it up a bit...
Sami would definitely be one of them, it's official in Norway at least. They might also be counting the 2 written forms of Norwegian as separate official languages.
I think it is a good idea. Norway and Sweden is building their own military equipments Denmark chips in with electronics as we build for the F35 fighter
Make a new standard Scandinavian language based on all continental North Germanic dialects. Or just force everyone to speak Sami. Make a new capital far up north at the border between Finland, Norway and Sweden, with a parliament building made out of ice. Then make it an elective monarchy, where a new (still powerless) monarch is chosen every 4 years in a reality tv show.
The think is, I'm sure a union would not be possible now, there are to many minor differences that are major in terms of national differences, for a union to succeed if it was put together in an instance. But say we start out with cross border cooperation with energy and energy export, do the same with energy as we did originally with SAS, do that for some 30-40 years. Create a pan-Nordic military, that is manned with selected personnel from each Nordic country's military, and gets allocated parts, say 10-15%, of the defence budget of each nation, with an expressed intention of integrating a larger part the different countries military into this pan-Nordic Armed Forces. Do that for 30-40 years, perhaps 60-70 years. Then reopen our monetary project and link up the currencies, then wait some 30-40 years again. Next could be giving the Nordic Council a bit more political power on the international arena, and wait some 30-40 years again. Continue on such a path, and I'd say you would get a union after some 2-300 years. Or the EU could collapse, Trump or another of his ilk getting power in the USA and destroying NATO, with Russia back on its feet and starting annexing things not theirs again, and you may see a Nordic Union in less than 10 years.
Impressive studies of interest for this video! The pandemic was a kick in the Nordic Council’s butt to deliver. There is already defense agreements but I believe NATO will actually bring something similar to a union as EU and UN also has problems to deliver.
As fun as it is to have a brother, you don't want to live with your brother. It's good to have a house of your own. We more or less have the benefit of a union, with EU, EES and the Nordic council. And we can still tease each other and compeet. The football game btw Denmark and Sweden is the most important game in Denmark. The hockeygame btw Finland and Sweden is religion in Finland. And there is a bit of a rivalry between Norway and Sweden in crosscountry skiing. Why just Sweden in those games? Because Sweden behave as the big brother of Scandinavia. They got better out of WWII and got a boosted economy in 3-4 decades, but now basicly overruned by both Denmark and Norway. Probably Finland too. But they still think they are the big brother. Calling Stockholm "The capital of Scandinavia". Naahh, I don't think a full union into one country is the way to go further. That would give Sweden to many ideas. And the other countries will probably let Sweden sort out some of their problems themself. The organized gang violence. 50 homicides with firearms so far this year in Sweden. Maybe not much compared to St Luis och Chicago, but in the Nordic countries that is alot. The others don't want "Svenske tilstande".
Quite good video on the topic, but makes the same mistake as many others - it’s a Nordic _union_ not a Nordic country. The European Union is not a country. And the Nordic union already exists, called the Nordic council as you said. So the question would be what if the Nordic union would tighten the already existing union. In which areas? First obvious is a currency union, today there are five different currencies, but the Nordic Krona would be very beneficial for the region. It has been talks about this, last time in the early 90s before many Nordic countries chose EU instead. Secondly would be a deeper military cooperation, which is very easy now when all are members of Nato. Third could be standardization of infrastructure, it’s somewhat problematic to take train Copenhagen - Oslo - trondheim today. Forth could be more cooperation for self sustainability as a union, together we could be very self sustainable if we just cooperated towards that goal. Very good from a geopolitical view. Let’s start there and see what’s needed in 20 years. Cheers to the fantastic Nordic friends, you rock!
No, Norway has only bad experience with unions. Thats why we are not in EU. Also, royal scrapping is a not a suggestion. Its part of our history and important to us.
2:44 / 4:03 You forgot some countries just like Estonia 🇪🇪, Latvia 🇱🇻, Lithuania 🇱🇹 and The Orkney Islands 🏝️ and The Shetland Islands 🏝️ and The Åland Islands 🇦🇽 as well and the northern part of Germany 🇩🇪 and Poland 🇵🇱 and ( Northumbria - England 🏴 ) / (Mercia - England 🏴) and ( East Anglia - England 🏴 ), ( Danelaw ) and ( North Sea Empire - Anglo -Scandinavian Empire the personal union of the kingdoms of England 🏴, Denmark 🇩🇰 and Norway 🇳🇴 ) as well 😉😄😃😁😎😊🤜🏻🤛🏻👍🏻🤘🏻🍺🍺🍺🍺🍺🍺🍻🍻🍻🍻🍻🍻
Absolute pure fantasy but great fun. I cannot forsee (I am a Swede) Norwegians accept a Union with Sweden under any circumstances again. Even if they would have to starve to stay out of the union, they would still take independence anyway. I sort of understand them. Why would they?
This might be a specifically Norwegian thing, but we would NEVER entertain the idea of another union, as it would go against our deep rooted culture, and values(we already fought several wars about this very thing) and cherish our independence with a passion. A "Nordic Confederacy/League" is something we could likely entertain the idea of though. As in all the nordic nations would keep their own sovereignty, and have full autonomy of their own internal politics, but create even deeper trade/commerce ties and create a joint foreign policy and military. This would in essence just be a strengthening/boost of the already existing Nordic Council(Sweden would first have to make some serious changes first though, and exorcise their facination with Blarian multiculturalism). Considering our shared history, values and perspective I think that could possibly succeed, and strenghten all of us on the geo-political scene, but an actual Union is completely out of the question! We value our sovereignty and autonomy too much, and to paraphrase what someone wrote in a comment here: "Although we might be like siblings, we have lived apart for many years now, and adult siblings although they love eachother, would not enjoy living together under the same roof once more".
The solution must be: adopt the Icelandic flag, because it is the most beautiful, - the Danish energy policy because it is the most rational, - the Norwegian language "bokmål" because it is intelligible and sounds happy, - the Finnish constitution because it is the most democratic and well-balanced, and we'll add a ceremonial over-royal layer, with the Swedish "drottning" Victoria as a symbol of kinship-values.
@@dallesamllhals9161 , der er altså ikke nogen grund til at opføre sig dårligt og uhøfligt med en bunke bandeord på flere sprog bare fordi man er uenig med hvad andre måtte foreslå. Mega dårlig stil. 😡
I think it wholey depends on how a new Kalmar union would be structured. Would it be like the US, or maybe more like the EU. We already have the beginnings with the nordic council. I think a lot of people would vote yes for the more EU style of union. A united states of scandinavia however would be a lot harder. Unlike the US each country here has a decent amount of history of being a soveriegn nation. The flag problem alone might mean that it couldn't happen. There is no way you are making the danes use a new flag instead of Dannebrog
Fun episode. You did not get into what advantages Kalmar 2 would bring? Sports, size and population ranking is not a benefit. What could we do better together than we do seperate today? I think Scotland would also love to join. Maybe Kalmar 2 could take back our old lands: England, Ireland, Slesvig, Quebec and Russia. A good name would be: Vikings 😉
I think that If it ever came to, it would most likely be like the USA, were the countries become states under a federal government (the Nordic counsel). I honestly think that it would become the new "American dream" as... You know... We actually have rights, and politicians who (mostly) believe in and fight for our rights...
@@madsballing9288 the government has recommended businesses and citizens to lower the heat to at least 19 degrees. This still holds true, but it was especially so when i first responded
The Nordic Union is a very good idea, but the individual countries will not and must not give up their sovereignty. It will be a continuation of EFTA without the EU. Countries such as Scotland, the Schleswig-Holstein, The Baltic states, the Netherlands, Ireland should also be included
Regarding the Monarchs I feel that under such a union they should all still exist without any issue maybe make a requirement of them to act in unison when it comes to unified Nordic union's prime minister essentially a similar solution as we have now just on the larger scale. and notice how I used a different name than Kalmar Union as it in the other countries have a negative association to that name.
I love you guys 🤗. Can you tell the world how you Experienced danish classic dishes like, stegt flæsk med persillesovs, dansk bøf med bløde løg, frikadeller og flæskesteg med brun sovs, biksemad og måske evt svensk pølseret. If you havent try't yet.. Well then I think you have something to look forward too 🤗🙃😊😉👍🏻
Navy cooperation in NATO like the air forces do? How would fire brigades cooperate in large forest fires? Preventing the spread of dangerous plant and animal diseases together? Moving food between countries easier? Come up with more cooperation ideas....
The historic enmity between Denmark and Sweden had very deep reasons. Dannes will mention the annexing of Skåne, Halland and Blekinge, and the Swedish genocide of danes in those areas. Swedes might mention the bloodbath in Stockholm. Let's just say that no other two nations have had as many wars. Heroes from the wars against Sweden are still very much celebrated in Denmark. For instance, look up the guy on the matchboxes, Tordenskjold. Or Niels Juel, the guy with the statue at the most expensive address in the country, next to Holmens kirke. Throwing drunken Swedes into the Harbour at Nyhavn was a Copenhagen sport well into the 20th century. In the EU, Denmark always sides with Germany and Sweden always sides with a France. Not because we agree with those countries, but because of mutual hatred. So a new Nordic union could have Denmark. Our it could have Sweden. But there is no way it could have both. Me, I love Sweden. The only bad thing about it is the swedes.
@@RobeTrotting seriously, look up Tordenskjold. Many of the stories about him (and the song. Ask any Dane to sing it.) was created by himself. They are like the Robin Hood stories.
@@RobeTrotting also, maybe find a translation of the Danish "royal song" that is played whenever a Dane wins at a sport event. It is all about the Danish -Swedish wars, and very, very graphic. Everybody loves the way it describes, that when you hit a swede hard enough on the head, both his helm and brain will splatter.
The good thing about all this, however, is that it is in the past. The wars are in the past, the naval heroes are not exactly celebrated today, and the hatred is in the past for the majority that lives in the present. Even the Danish national anthem is in the past tense, descriptive of past events and not normative today. As a historian: Things change over time.
I think it could happen - but after a model like the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, where England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales act as constituent countries, that can impose "state-wide" laws, and where the UK as a whole is a federation. In practice, that would probably be the Nordic Union of Kingdoms and Republics, that controls governmental topics like justice, foreign affairs, trade, defense and emergency management, where other topics are still a matter of state-wide politics. The issue with UK however is that England and the UK are not always that separable, which makes in particular Scotland unhappy with the union, but I think that a federation could embrace those differences.
Playing with the idea of the Kalmar Union (or the Nordic Council/Nordic Union) is something that some of us Scandinavians, Nordics or Baltics do on r/KalmarReunion and many have come up with fantastic suggestions on how we could have done it and also be a major player in Europe or the rest of the world. Personally, I would have preferred that we continue with the former Kalmar Union (If possible) and continue with both the Danish and Swedish fronts, thus making sure that the Faroe Islands, Iceland, Greenland, Finland (with the Kola Peninsula and all of Karelia), and Estonia (Ingria as the eastern half of the country ) are member states of the Union while the United Kingdom of Scandinavia is the founder of the Kalmar Union.
"warning ironi occur" - What if Scandinavia just reclaimed the USA, hold a sham referendum, since it was Vikings first trying to colonise it - according to Putin-logic.
The biggest problem with that Union would likely be Sweden. The rest would likely get along just fine. They would likely go play "Give and take" but not Sweden. Swedes loves to feel better than the rest of us and they love to tell us what to do.... and their politician makes all the other Nordic countries government the most reliable people in the world(and we know our politicians are really unreliable.) A Union where Sweden is a part of would be so mismanaged if Sweden had a say... so for the sake of such a union Sweden should have no say in anything political. I don't care where a capital would be....as long as it wasn't in Sweden. By the way I don't hate Swedes. I really just don't trust their decision making... specially not in politics. Sweden's politicians have been living in their own "Utopia" for to long. 😉
Most swedes i know dont fall under that cathegory . most of us do know that we r far from the best in many topics. On the contrary i have actually met a lot of other nordics saying they r the best and worth listening to )) We just want to be left alone doin our businnes.
Not happening. At least not in a peaceful, calm environment. This might happen rather suddenly in some fashion if the current debacle with Russia goes south, and EU and NATO fails. In this sort of environment Denmark, Sweden and Finland might possible quickly slap something together to ensure some sort of security. Then Iceland and Norway could consider joining if they are pressured too.
Yes the danes sure Sweden has always been the big brother up here and we still are we even went east up rivers and founded villages and in time we seem to have layed the ground for for example russia to see the day of light. Karl the 12 was out kicking but all over the place etc etc. Not sure Greenland if the people there made any big noice so far back in history, I think they where busy just trying to survive. It is pronounced Kalmar with an a like in aj aj capten and if there ever would be a reunion there would be lots of fighting which capital we choose to lead. If it should be Stockholm, Copenhagen or Oslo and Reykavik and Helsinki might want to speak up. But absolutely not Kalmar it is just a town among many here today.
NJAAAEE I dont think so, study the history off SAS, which was the outcome off the meeting in 1953, we havent been able to agree on an airline for the last 40 years, so countrys ??????????????????????
The Scandinavian peoples call each other "broderfolk". A very apt description. With all the feelings of community and rivalry. We would never accept any of the other Scandinavians to rule over us. 😁
But we certainly won't let any outsider mess with one of our 'brotherly people'
@@joelthorstensson2772 unless it's Sweden
“Everything will be OK, if the other guys just shut up and do what we say.”
The best way to reunite the Kalmar union is if somebody shits the bed so hard, that everyone in the old Kalmar union agrees we dislike that guy more than the old Kalmarites.
As a Finn, if there ever comes a day when EU falls apart, I'd be happy to create a new union with our brother nations in the North.
I agree with you my Finnish brotheren. It be awesome to see as well!
I’ve always wanted a united scandinavia. Love from Norway🇳🇴🤝🇫🇮
🇫🇮🤝🇸🇪🤝🇳🇴🤝🇩🇰
But not under the name Kalmar union, brings back bad memories
Yess Nordism ftw I hope it happens one day.
2:19 You misunderstood the reason for the Wars. Both Denmark and Sweden wanted to recreate the Union, just with slightly different views of which Royal House and Capital it should have.
On the topic of Denmark and Sweden, I would say. We are separated only by a canel and a thousand years of wars, and connected only by a bridge and 1000 Years of Brotherhood.
..hundreds not thousands!
PS. This Jute's very sry' for what Sjælland did to you!
@@dallesamllhals9161 Sjælland did the right thing
I am from South Jutland
@@Jonslau Traitor(djævleø wannabe) ;-P
We låst Skåne in 1658
That's not a thousand years ago.
@@missa2855 Define "WE"? (Jutes are from Jutland)
This was great brainstorming, guys! 😃
Fun to think about and perhaps a serious possibility in the near future?
hello from Hundested 🌸🌱
This was a fun idea to explore, thanks for watching as always 😃😃😃
Appreciation from me, too!
I would be in favour of a unification of the Nordic countries. I think we should go for the South African solution for capitals though, having multiple capital cities.
I also think language-wise the best solution would be to just keep the current system largely, since pretty much everyone learns a continental North Germanic language in school already. We'd just have to get better at teaching some of the other ones to increase mutual intelligibility, more exposure. Perhaps those of us speaking a continental North Germanic language natively should learn at least some Finnish as well.
In the end though there are several hurdles to overcome before this would ever happen, many of them economical. For Norway joining the EU for example is not really an option due to fishing and especially agriculture. It's so difficult and expensive to farm in Norway that it requires considerable government subsidies, so in a union for a "fair" market that would all be gone.
Great topic guys. It reminded me about the web comic 'Scandinavia and the world'
Fascinating and innovative video. Mange tak!
There's a definite kinship that could be cultivated even more in this idea. I'm sure the autonomy issues would rear their heads pretty soon though.
But a fun vision indeed. Well done.
I think it could be a great thing to do. But the number of different political parties in the first years would be insane 😳
Not necessarily, if you check the parties in at least Swedish, Finnish, Norwegian and Danish parliament 8 of them (and that is most or all) do have a close or rather close sister party in the other countries so if they just merged over the former borders with their sister parties fast enough that wouldn't be a problem.
Hahaha... Great brainstorm on the eurovision dilemmas with a new kalmar union 😅
An easy correlation 😂
I think there exist no other neighboring countries in the history that have been fighting each other so thoroughly as 🇩🇰 🇸🇪. Shall we call this brother of love?❤
Like all neighboring countries? However most needed up with one swallow the other. We have now understood it’s better to cooperate with siblings than fighting. At the time it was kings fighting for their power, the people found it really hard to kill their siblings just because some kings told them so. Maybe that’s why we have the strongest democracy in the world now, never again forced to kill our friends.
Especially since you released that on Germany's reunification day I can say: Easier said than done. Germany was divided for 45 years, together now again for 32 and... well, Facebook relationship status would be "it's complicated" ;)
Ah, yeah there are plenty of examples of potential issues 😃 Germany definitely has some lessons.
@@RobeTrotting go back to the US if you want murders!
META = complicated 😛
Gewrmany is a slow, conservative country and has been for decades....they stil use fax and paper for communiucation in the public sector.
A Kalmar Union sounds like a great idea. I hope they do it. 👍💡The Scandinavian countries all have a high quality of life and wise governments. There is power in joining forces.
What about the individual monarchies
@@gitakumari1098 They could view the monarchs like state governors in the USA. The monarchs would represent their specific region within the union when they go to charitable events.
It was a reaction way it fail. It was the difference between the contries and it still is.
@@thomasengdahl6719 Tror du, de har mere til fælles med hinanden nu. Der er store forskelle mellem de tidligere Kalmar-lande og resten af nutidens moderne verden. Skandinaviske lande er mindre korrupte og forstår vigtigheden af socialisme for at skabe et velfungerende miljø for erhvervslivet.
I have had these thoughts too, and i actually would for it, but in my version, they should try and get Letland, Lithauen and Estland to join too.
Partially in the borders of Sweden at various times and always close ties with Poland-Lithuania.
Northern pat of Estonia was in the Kalmar Union
Yes. Let’s invite them. They were too part of the Nordic empire once.
Btw i saw the "Margrete den første" movie in the theater, and it was really good, the history i knew was brief so it did a great job teaching a little and making me look up the history later on.
And then you learned that Marghthe 1. was never queen of Denmark nut only Norway and Swenden.
@@kurtolsen7989 Elected Regent
Strictly speaking, Margaret I was not queen. She was Regent (in Denmark) on behalf of her son and Queen-consort (in Norway and Sweden), but not queen in her own right.
She definitely deserved it, and when Margaret II of Denmark ascended the Thone, she chose to be “II” to celebrate her predecessor.
Sure - different times back then haha - but she was a crafty woman! :)
I don't want a kingdom ! I want to live in a constitutional republic.
The Kalmar Union is not totally abollished - that is what keeps the Faroe Islands (which was part of Norway) and Denmark together. Some legislation intended for Norway only - parts of king Christian 5. Norwegian law from 1683 is still in effect in the Faroe Islands.
Can you provide us with a link or a citation?
I don't mind it being in Faeroese.
I don't think uniqueness would break the mold, we do share alot of history. And even if it were to become 1 country, such uniqueness would't be forgotten
Does it have to be one state? Can we be a northern union or a northern federal state?
There's something off w Derek's mic, almost like it's not plugged in or set high enough. There's a clear difference in your audio 🥺
Our cultures are more different than people from the outside see, after we have been at war with each other for more than a thousand years, we have found a model that works, good borders and lots of cooperation, but each our country and culture, everything else creates chaos, we don't want more wars, siblings don't live together as adults. We are strong when we cooperate, but would become weak if we were to be foolish enough to try to become a unit, there would be far too many infighting.
..like with EU-South?
@@dallesamllhals9161 Much worse, no other countries in the world has had as many wars with each other as the Danes and the Swedes, now we have peace and both parties want to keep it.We don't want to rock the boat.
@@bernadetterubin4892 That's a CLEAN LIE! Og det ER FAKTA. Yup! ..a Dane here!
EDIT: +1 for "Bernadette" ;-)
@@dallesamllhals9161 Jeg må ærlig indrømme at jeg ikke forstår dig.
Slåss inte nu bröder och systrar. Kom och hjälp mig skruva ihop den här bokhyllan istället!
Loved the whiskey tango foxtrot :D
haha thank you 😊
"the royals... let's scrap them..." oh boy Derek.. dont go there, you just put your hand in a Bee nest.
Haha, I thought I left it pretty open ended 😂
@@RobeTrotting
had we not known from earlier that you are a bit of a "closet royalist" 😉 you would probably have scored a few raised eyebrows
Fascinating piece, but I would probably have spent a little bit of speculation that Greenland would not want to be in it so much. Over the years they've been working hard on trying to get more and more independence from Denmark. I believe they are more inclined these days to consider themselves a North American country than a European one. (Which is logical.)
I'm Danish and would 10000% support this....Even if it meant Denmark would have to compromise on a lot of stuff.
@@williamjones4716
Food is essential to get any work done, Denmark’s contribution cannot be understated. To this, add abundance of clean electricity as all Nordic countries and some oil as Norway. Also vacation goto for fantastic beaches and tourism. Most welcome! 💜
interesting!
Glad you think so! 😃
love the way you explain these history events :) interesting idea of a new kalmar union... not going to happen anytime soon. eurovision problems hahahahhahaaa
The borders you mentioned at 4:43 you forgot to mention we would also be sharing a land border with Australia and the UK in Antarctica.
Well, we’re American so we don’t recognize the 7 territorial claims in Antarctica 😂
I thought your informative, and interesting idea sounded great, up until you mentioned scrapping "my" Swedish royal family. Then you mentioned Eurovision. No, Nope, won't happen! But I still really liked the video. 😃
Haha I mean, I thought we left the royal decision pretty open 😃 it would be hard to dilute the Eurovision influence though!
Yes, it has to be a Nordic Union, with united but individual countries - not the United States of Norden, more like the European Union, in addition to the member countries.
You had me convinced, right up until Eurovision. LESS drama in my EUROVISION?! No, never, not gonna happen; Nordic unity is off the table permanently 😆 Jokes aside, with all the work the Nordic Council has accomplished over the years, the Nordics are closer knit now than they ever were during the Kalmar Union years. Apart from imports/exports and trade, you can pretty much just pull up your stakes, and move wherever you want to a much greater degree than even the EU framework allows. Also, disappointed you didn't mention Faroese fish exports 😜 If you've ever eaten high-end (aqua culture) salmon, it's most likely Faroese 😊
I live in Sweden. A nordic union is an interesting thought that I think have been lingering in the back of people's minds for a long time. If a serious proposition came to the table, I believe most swedes at least would say 'YES!' without any second thoughts or need to elaborations. Then, it would take decades to work out the details... The Kalmar union were no happy family but a necessity to counteract the german influence from the Deutsche Orden etc. It was more like a coup d' etat of three states by one royal family with connections to all three families going for the highest prize when chance and skilled politics gave the opportunity. After Sweden leaving, the remnants of the union still existed all the way to the days of Napoleon where Denmark kept it's stranglehold of Norway until it was decided by the powers to be in compensation to Sweden for the loss of the eastern part, now known as Finland, to the Russians which was initiated by Napoleon. The nordic countries today is partly a consequence of the Napoleon wars, which cause some of the tensions still existing between the countries as well.
However, I believe we feel more in common with the other nordics than with the mainland europe all in all, and this becomes more evident the farther north you go. This is why a nordic union would be an alternative. However I doubt we are prepared to create a state out of that union at this moment, like the USA. A trade, defence, maybe a foreign politics union could be an option but I think we would like to keep some of our differences to avoid tension between our differences. A common nordic language? Sure, over time it would be a great benefit to us. Finland may beg to differ perhaps but they learn swedish at school and hate it, maybe they would embrace a 'nordic' language differently (as swedish is a bit controversial since the events of 1814).
When would such a nordic union become a threat? I'm sure we would at least consider to involve the Baltics and then Russia would go totally bananas of course. Engaging the Baltics would eliminate the possibility of the 20th century attitude to wards Russia where the nordics are reluctantly but still open towards the Russian neighbour. We can't really do this passing by the Baltics but if they are on this train with us, the geopolitics change, the nordic situation will not be the same, the prerequisites changes dramatically.
The Nordic council is already a kind of hazy, half-assed union in itself, we have certain benefits reserved within that nordic treaty already, the question is what we would gain or risk out of a deeper collaboration, and that might not be quite as obvious. I think it all comes down to if we as peoples of those countries would be attracted to the idea of a nordic empire or not. This is not far from the once Swedish dream of the Baltic as a Swedish inland sea during the 17th century. You could compare it to the mid-20th century idea Germany brought forth and how it comes to fruition within EU today. I doubt the other nordics would let that pass their eyesight. It certainly wouldn't pass by unnoticed by the leaders in Stockholm I'm sure, whatever they'll say about that. They would go to sleep with a boner just thinking about it even though it's out of line with the present official agenda.
Agreed. The Russian problem! If a Nordic nation was formed, how would Russia react to being trapped with no international waters out of the Baltic sea?
@@torbjrnhansen8521 It's getting closer already by the NATO applications by Sweden and Finland. From their point of view, they might have to react. I believe Sweden and Finland forgot the thin line they've walked for a long time, to their own benefit and to the opportunity to a peaceful relation with Russia. Sweden already had the nuclear retaliation guarantee from USA in exchange for ending it's own nuke program, NATO can't bring anything more, so there's other reasons than defence to the present NATO application. Finland is different, they have no secret deals, they live in the reality and needs trustworthy allies, instead of Sweden as their closest partner.
It would be a great idea if it wasn't for the problem with the Eurovision Song Contest 😀
LOL
Dream on, guys, the Kalmar Union eventually failed the first time, it’s not going to succeed the second time. We are happy as sibling nations, but one family all together in one house? Nah, it’s ain’t gonna happen.
Besides, Greenland dreams about independence. Not about a closer Anschluss to the the other Nordic countries. As for potential oil wealth in Greenland….well, lots of talk, lots of speculation, and lots of exploration, but the fact remains that not one drop of oil has actually been found in Greenland. Furthermore, the Greenland government is very iffy about any kind of oil drilling or mining due to the obvious pollution problems of such activities that invariably will be a threat to our traditional way of life in Greenland which involves hunting and fishing.
Let me correct a big misconception.
A new Kalmar Union will consist of a Union of sovereign countries, where the most important thing will be trade. It will be called the Nordic Union.
There will be several joint embassies where each country will be represented, this model exists in several countries already today.
There will be a Nordic Song Competition that surpasses esc. Sports competitions and cultural activities. An expanded energy network and infrastructure.
Countries such as the Baltic countries, Scotland, Ireland and the Netherlands will be included. And possibly also eventually New Zealand, Australia, Canada and Schleswig-Holstein.
Like the idea
A union would propably be a union of nations, like a mini-EU where every state keeps it's name and institutions, rather than a US like one country. Then royal families and Eurovision would be no problem at all.
And sports... well, the UK lets every country compete in football as themselves...
So, if the EU and/or NATO would collapse, maybe a nordic union would emerge... but more like a federation and not like a nation.
Right, you’ve already got it in name and principle with the Nordic Council so it wouldn’t take much to formalize things a bit farther for the other loose ends.
Perfect idea.
Sounds good. Please please can Northern Ireland and Scotland join too? 😂 most of us have Viking blood anyway. 💗
Yeah, that's true and so cool!
I see a new Kalmar Union being more of a Treaty organisation similar to Nato or EU, but able to prioritize Nordic ideals and progress. At most being similar to United States. With Turkey denying swedish entrance to NATO, having a Baltic/North Sea alliance localized to the Nordic regions, as well as loosely uniting their military (especially navy), they can ensure theyre own security and trade better than current disposition.
One thing to note is if a Nordic Union formed, the Russian Baltic fleet would be completely outmatched. Currently it's capable of easily taking on any one or two of the Scandinavian countries in the Baltic. But united Russia doesn't stand a chance.
Furthermore, I could see them acting as a single political entity in regards to foreign and military affairs, with combined army, Navy, and Air Force, but work completely independently in regard to domestic policy and governance. This would separate their reliance almost completely on larger, slower, more bureaucratic organisations like EU and NATO, able to react to shifts in economics and threats more readily.
We in the Nordics have had a military cooperation since a long time ago and Sweden and Finland have had an even closer relationship (was one of the reasons why we applied for NATO at the same time as we both join or not) then we in the Nordics have had many joint exercises over the years. Then we in Sweden have another name for the king who decided and it is Kristian Turran when you call him Kristion the Great. I saw that you will have elections soon and it might be interesting to hear your interpretation of the political parties you have in Denmark (I think it's confusing with your conservative party called Venstre as in Sweden we have the Vänsterpartiet (similar spelling to yours) which has its basis in the Communist Party)
but it will not be a return to the time when no one wants to give up their right to determine their own country's path, but we have had cooperation since Sweden gave away Norway (they would vote to become part of Sweden again after 100 years but I can't find if it was even reached then it was clear who would win)
It's not that complicated "venstre" are called that because they were the left wing when we were a two chamber system back in the day (1849-1953) they just didn't change the Name when the actual left wing came arund... And btw "venstre" aren't conservative they are "liberale" (not the US version)... "højere" back in the day was the conservatives... Hope this clears it up a bit...
9 languages--I can think of Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, Finnish, Faroese, Icelandic, Greenlandic. Which 2 am I missing?
Sami would definitely be one of them, it's official in Norway at least. They might also be counting the 2 written forms of Norwegian as separate official languages.
I think it is a good idea. Norway and Sweden is building their own military equipments Denmark chips in with electronics as we build for the F35 fighter
Very nice. Danish born. Loving my fellow siblings. (You can visit) More than 3 days! Piss off. The short story.
You missed NORDEFCO.
Make a new standard Scandinavian language based on all continental North Germanic dialects. Or just force everyone to speak Sami. Make a new capital far up north at the border between Finland, Norway and Sweden, with a parliament building made out of ice. Then make it an elective monarchy, where a new (still powerless) monarch is chosen every 4 years in a reality tv show.
These are really cool ideas!
Love the idea
Finnish is not north germanic language.
@@EpicBurritto i know
@@EpicBurritto And we love to talk Finnish.
Plz add UPLOADING DATE on your's videos
when it comes to hockey in the end we will always win.
Can have a Union whit separate states. An outside EU
The think is, I'm sure a union would not be possible now, there are to many minor differences that are major in terms of national differences, for a union to succeed if it was put together in an instance.
But say we start out with cross border cooperation with energy and energy export, do the same with energy as we did originally with SAS, do that for some 30-40 years.
Create a pan-Nordic military, that is manned with selected personnel from each Nordic country's military, and gets allocated parts, say 10-15%, of the defence budget of each nation, with an expressed intention of integrating a larger part the different countries military into this pan-Nordic Armed Forces. Do that for 30-40 years, perhaps 60-70 years.
Then reopen our monetary project and link up the currencies, then wait some 30-40 years again.
Next could be giving the Nordic Council a bit more political power on the international arena, and wait some 30-40 years again.
Continue on such a path, and I'd say you would get a union after some 2-300 years.
Or the EU could collapse, Trump or another of his ilk getting power in the USA and destroying NATO, with Russia back on its feet and starting annexing things not theirs again, and you may see a Nordic Union in less than 10 years.
It was silver at the 1998 olympics. Not bronze
Impressive studies of interest for this video! The pandemic was a kick in the Nordic Council’s butt to deliver. There is already defense agreements but I believe NATO will actually bring something similar to a union as EU and UN also has problems to deliver.
As fun as it is to have a brother, you don't want to live with your brother. It's good to have a house of your own. We more or less have the benefit of a union, with EU, EES and the Nordic council. And we can still tease each other and compeet. The football game btw Denmark and Sweden is the most important game in Denmark. The hockeygame btw Finland and Sweden is religion in Finland. And there is a bit of a rivalry between Norway and Sweden in crosscountry skiing. Why just Sweden in those games? Because Sweden behave as the big brother of Scandinavia. They got better out of WWII and got a boosted economy in 3-4 decades, but now basicly overruned by both Denmark and Norway. Probably Finland too. But they still think they are the big brother. Calling Stockholm "The capital of Scandinavia".
Naahh, I don't think a full union into one country is the way to go further. That would give Sweden to many ideas. And the other countries will probably let Sweden sort out some of their problems themself. The organized gang violence. 50 homicides with firearms so far this year in Sweden. Maybe not much compared to St Luis och Chicago, but in the Nordic countries that is alot. The others don't want "Svenske tilstande".
Quite good video on the topic, but makes the same mistake as many others - it’s a Nordic _union_ not a Nordic country. The European Union is not a country. And the Nordic union already exists, called the Nordic council as you said.
So the question would be what if the Nordic union would tighten the already existing union. In which areas?
First obvious is a currency union, today there are five different currencies, but the Nordic Krona would be very beneficial for the region. It has been talks about this, last time in the early 90s before many Nordic countries chose EU instead.
Secondly would be a deeper military cooperation, which is very easy now when all are members of Nato.
Third could be standardization of infrastructure, it’s somewhat problematic to take train Copenhagen - Oslo - trondheim today.
Forth could be more cooperation for self sustainability as a union, together we could be very self sustainable if we just cooperated towards that goal. Very good from a geopolitical view.
Let’s start there and see what’s needed in 20 years. Cheers to the fantastic Nordic friends, you rock!
No, Norway has only bad experience with unions. Thats why we are not in EU. Also, royal scrapping is a not a suggestion. Its part of our history and important to us.
2:44 / 4:03 You forgot some countries just like Estonia 🇪🇪, Latvia 🇱🇻, Lithuania 🇱🇹 and The Orkney Islands 🏝️ and The Shetland Islands 🏝️ and The Åland Islands 🇦🇽 as well and the northern part of Germany 🇩🇪 and Poland 🇵🇱 and ( Northumbria - England 🏴 ) / (Mercia - England 🏴) and ( East Anglia - England 🏴 ), ( Danelaw ) and ( North Sea Empire - Anglo -Scandinavian Empire the personal union of the kingdoms of England 🏴, Denmark 🇩🇰 and Norway 🇳🇴 ) as well 😉😄😃😁😎😊🤜🏻🤛🏻👍🏻🤘🏻🍺🍺🍺🍺🍺🍺🍻🍻🍻🍻🍻🍻
Well, the Kalmar Union didn’t overlap with the North Sea Empire.
@@RobeTrotting Okay my friend 😎🤜🏻🤛🏻👍🏻🤘🏻🍺🍺🍺🍺🍺🍻🍻🍻🍻🍻🍻
Absolute pure fantasy but great fun. I cannot forsee (I am a Swede) Norwegians accept a Union with Sweden under any circumstances again. Even if they would have to starve to stay out of the union, they would still take independence anyway. I sort of understand them. Why would they?
As a Norwegian I wholeheartedly agree😂
We do love you guys, but we love our independence a lot more😊
I would think making Kalmar the capital would be the logical choice for the Kalmar union
🇩🇰🤝🇸🇪🤝🇫🇮🤝🇧🇻🤝🇮🇸🤝faroe🤝🇬🇱🤝 aaland Ultimate power - from 🇸🇪
Hope Kalmar would be the centre as well 🙂 nice town
Just NOT Malmö !
@@dallesamllhals9161 I like it here 🙂 but I do think Kalmar deserves some attention.
@@martah5369 Yeah-yeah...i can live with that (Ja-ja, kan jeg leve med) ;-)
@@dallesamllhals9161 men välkommen te Malme'
@@martah5369 ..det var slet ikke så slemt i 2001-2004. Da denne Jyde var tæt på(København) Gode fester+. Men BEDRE nu...Naaah...
Flag: Yellow with red cross. Capital: Uppsala (for historical reasons)
This might be a specifically Norwegian thing, but we would NEVER entertain the idea of another union, as it would go against our deep rooted culture, and values(we already fought several wars about this very thing) and cherish our independence with a passion.
A "Nordic Confederacy/League" is something we could likely entertain the idea of though.
As in all the nordic nations would keep their own sovereignty, and have full autonomy of their own internal politics, but create even deeper trade/commerce ties and create a joint foreign policy and military.
This would in essence just be a strengthening/boost of the already existing Nordic Council(Sweden would first have to make some serious changes first though, and exorcise their facination with Blarian multiculturalism).
Considering our shared history, values and perspective I think that could possibly succeed, and strenghten all of us on the geo-political scene, but an actual Union is completely out of the question!
We value our sovereignty and autonomy too much, and to paraphrase what someone wrote in a comment here: "Although we might be like siblings, we have lived apart for many years now, and adult siblings although they love eachother, would not enjoy living together under the same roof once more".
In Eurovision Scandinavia would simply vote for one of the Baltic nations or possibly Ireland.
Ah, good point. Similar music traditions and tastes and a natural “next closest” in terms of shared traits :)
This is content a pan-scandinavian can enioy :)
We hope so, it was a fun one to think about even as Americans 😃
The solution must be: adopt the Icelandic flag, because it is the most beautiful,
- the Danish energy policy because it is the most rational,
- the Norwegian language "bokmål" because it is intelligible and sounds happy,
- the Finnish constitution because it is the most democratic and well-balanced, and we'll add a ceremonial over-royal layer, with the Swedish "drottning" Victoria as a symbol of kinship-values.
1: Nope! 1944 = YOU LEFT!
2: A BLOODY lie!
3: No it ain't - ikke engang TÆT på!
4: Nokia's gone 😞 Perkele! ♥ from Jutland
@@dallesamllhals9161 My suggestions are anyway ... wait: better! Needed no swearing! 😀
@@DNA350ppm WHAT THE FUCK!?? ARE you swedish or just from Google™?
All in all: Bland dig uden om - hvis IKKE fra området...mmhkay?
@@dallesamllhals9161 , der er altså ikke nogen grund til at opføre sig dårligt og uhøfligt med en bunke bandeord på flere sprog bare fordi man er uenig med hvad andre måtte foreslå. Mega dårlig stil. 😡
@@julianneheindorf5757 I alle guder på hovdyr! Kan du blive mere sart? ..især nu med KRIG på vej! Mega-ton EJ mega-dårlig...beklager youngling 😞
I think it wholey depends on how a new Kalmar union would be structured. Would it be like the US, or maybe more like the EU. We already have the beginnings with the nordic council. I think a lot of people would vote yes for the more EU style of union. A united states of scandinavia however would be a lot harder. Unlike the US each country here has a decent amount of history of being a soveriegn nation. The flag problem alone might mean that it couldn't happen. There is no way you are making the danes use a new flag instead of Dannebrog
Fun episode. You did not get into what advantages Kalmar 2 would bring? Sports, size and population ranking is not a benefit. What could we do better together than we do seperate today?
I think Scotland would also love to join.
Maybe Kalmar 2 could take back our old lands: England, Ireland, Slesvig, Quebec and Russia.
A good name would be: Vikings 😉
I couldn't figure out what the 'kamer-union' was until I realised you mean Kalmarunion.
Oh.
I think that If it ever came to, it would most likely be like the USA, were the countries become states under a federal government (the Nordic counsel).
I honestly think that it would become the new "American dream" as... You know... We actually have rights, and politicians who (mostly) believe in and fight for our rights...
They work hard for the right to pay high taxes.
The government has asked to shut off our heat? Is that the danish dream? Great government.
@@jimmybaldbird3853 Source?
@@madsballing9288 the government has recommended businesses and citizens to lower the heat to at least 19 degrees. This still holds true, but it was especially so when i first responded
The amount of natural resources in the Nordics are absoultely insane, bring back the union!
The Nordic Union is a very good idea, but the individual countries will not and must not give up their sovereignty. It will be a continuation of EFTA without the EU.
Countries such as Scotland, the Schleswig-Holstein, The Baltic states, the Netherlands, Ireland should also be included
Regarding the Monarchs I feel that under such a union they should all still exist without any issue maybe make a requirement of them to act in unison when it comes to unified Nordic union's prime minister essentially a similar solution as we have now just on the larger scale. and notice how I used a different name than Kalmar Union as it in the other countries have a negative association to that name.
Yeah, that makes a lot of sense - and so does the name Nordic Union :)
Thanks for watching!
Malaysia is a union of nine monarchies whose sultans take turns as head of the union every five years. It also comprises provinces that are republics.
I love you guys 🤗.
Can you tell the world how you Experienced danish classic dishes like, stegt flæsk med persillesovs, dansk bøf med bløde løg, frikadeller og flæskesteg med brun sovs, biksemad og måske evt svensk pølseret.
If you havent try't yet.. Well then I think you have something to look forward too 🤗🙃😊😉👍🏻
Navy cooperation in NATO like the air forces do?
How would fire brigades cooperate in large forest fires?
Preventing the spread of dangerous plant and animal diseases together?
Moving food between countries easier?
Come up with more cooperation ideas....
Don't Sweden my Norway.
Don't California my Texas.
I am from sweden 🇸🇪
The historic enmity between Denmark and Sweden had very deep reasons. Dannes will mention the annexing of Skåne, Halland and Blekinge, and the Swedish genocide of danes in those areas. Swedes might mention the bloodbath in Stockholm. Let's just say that no other two nations have had as many wars. Heroes from the wars against Sweden are still very much celebrated in Denmark. For instance, look up the guy on the matchboxes, Tordenskjold. Or Niels Juel, the guy with the statue at the most expensive address in the country, next to Holmens kirke.
Throwing drunken Swedes into the Harbour at Nyhavn was a Copenhagen sport well into the 20th century.
In the EU, Denmark always sides with Germany and Sweden always sides with a France. Not because we agree with those countries, but because of mutual hatred.
So a new Nordic union could have Denmark. Our it could have Sweden. But there is no way it could have both.
Me, I love Sweden. The only bad thing about it is the swedes.
Some really dark history for sure
correction... on other two neighboring nations...
@@RobeTrotting seriously, look up Tordenskjold. Many of the stories about him (and the song. Ask any Dane to sing it.) was created by himself. They are like the Robin Hood stories.
@@RobeTrotting also, maybe find a translation of the Danish "royal song" that is played whenever a Dane wins at a sport event. It is all about the Danish -Swedish wars, and very, very graphic. Everybody loves the way it describes, that when you hit a swede hard enough on the head, both his helm and brain will splatter.
The good thing about all this, however, is that it is in the past. The wars are in the past, the naval heroes are not exactly celebrated today, and the hatred is in the past for the majority that lives in the present. Even the Danish national anthem is in the past tense, descriptive of past events and not normative today. As a historian: Things change over time.
As a Dane, I woudn't mind leaving EU in favor of a new union, with close relations to EU, something like Norway has now
I think it could happen - but after a model like the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, where England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales act as constituent countries, that can impose "state-wide" laws, and where the UK as a whole is a federation. In practice, that would probably be the Nordic Union of Kingdoms and Republics, that controls governmental topics like justice, foreign affairs, trade, defense and emergency management, where other topics are still a matter of state-wide politics.
The issue with UK however is that England and the UK are not always that separable, which makes in particular Scotland unhappy with the union, but I think that a federation could embrace those differences.
That would make the most sense
The nordic countries do this today. The politicians just keep it as a secret. The nordic people would go insane if they knew! :o)
Playing with the idea of the Kalmar Union (or the Nordic Council/Nordic Union) is something that some of us Scandinavians, Nordics or Baltics do on r/KalmarReunion and many have come up with fantastic suggestions on how we could have done it and also be a major player in Europe or the rest of the world.
Personally, I would have preferred that we continue with the former Kalmar Union (If possible) and continue with both the Danish and Swedish fronts, thus making sure that the Faroe Islands, Iceland, Greenland, Finland (with the Kola Peninsula and all of Karelia), and Estonia (Ingria as the eastern half of the country ) are member states of the Union while the United Kingdom of Scandinavia is the founder of the Kalmar Union.
We must be of equal value !
Norway would probably be the one losing out on this, dropping down on the GDP per capita ranking 😎
I Think al Nordic countries will get better if we work as one !
"warning ironi occur" - What if Scandinavia just reclaimed the USA, hold a sham referendum, since it was Vikings first trying to colonise it - according to Putin-logic.
The subs said "Ireland" instead of "Åland". Haha
You dont have one vote per country in the European Parliament. Denmark has 14, Sweden has 21 and Finland has 14 members of the European Parliament.
We did not say that
The biggest problem with that Union would likely be Sweden. The rest would likely get along just fine. They would likely go play "Give and take" but not Sweden.
Swedes loves to feel better than the rest of us and they love to tell us what to do.... and their politician makes all the other Nordic countries government the most reliable people in the world(and we know our politicians are really unreliable.)
A Union where Sweden is a part of would be so mismanaged if Sweden had a say... so for the sake of such a union Sweden should have no say in anything political. I don't care where a capital would be....as long as it wasn't in Sweden.
By the way I don't hate Swedes. I really just don't trust their decision making... specially not in politics. Sweden's politicians have been living in their own "Utopia" for to long. 😉
Either way you’d be better off than having “Florida” in the mix 😂
Most swedes i know dont fall under that cathegory . most of us do know that we r far from the best in many topics. On the contrary i have actually met a lot of other nordics saying they r the best and worth listening to )) We just want to be left alone doin our businnes.
Place the capital somewhere isolated on Greenland, so we can all get rid of our politicians.
Nice try, but no thanks 🙂. They are good friends, but I prefer to have my own house. Btw. is Danish history a hobby of yours or a part of your job?
It’s just an interest of ours - we both have always loved history 😃
Not happening. At least not in a peaceful, calm environment. This might happen rather suddenly in some fashion if the current debacle with Russia goes south, and EU and NATO fails. In this sort of environment Denmark, Sweden and Finland might possible quickly slap something together to ensure some sort of security. Then Iceland and Norway could consider joining if they are pressured too.
I want security also with Norway and Iceland !
Kom igjen brødre. Vi gjør det.
All the nordich countrys should united.
Impossible. Norway have tried unions with these countries before. Disaster.
Who are we supposed to make fun of tho?
On that basis I can not agree to this.
Well sounds a little too Danish to me😉
😂
We want our colonies back 😁🇩🇰
So thru. Everybody knows that Denmark is (Number1_ûber-Scandi¨Winner).
as a dane born in sweden i can say with certainty that the swedes will not accept danmrak as head of the union...ever....
Yeah, it’s a fun thought but probably impractical haha
And right you are! There has to be some .... öh, a big brother! 😀
Yes the danes sure Sweden has always been the big brother up here and we still are we even went east up rivers and founded villages and in time we seem to have layed the ground for for example russia to see the day of light. Karl the 12 was out kicking but all over the place etc etc.
Not sure Greenland if the people there made any big noice so far back in history, I think they where busy just trying to survive.
It is pronounced Kalmar with an a like in aj aj capten and if there ever would be a reunion there would be lots of fighting which capital we choose to lead. If it should be Stockholm, Copenhagen or Oslo and Reykavik and Helsinki might want to speak up. But absolutely not Kalmar it is just a town among many here today.
Norway and Denmark and Sweden should merge into a civilization state based on Scandinavian subculture, a new Kalmar Union, to fight against russia
Göteborg should be the capital. It's in the middle
I like that idea 🤔 maybe we should do a Götenorg trip and reaction video soon - we haven’t been yet
Nearly 30 million people of the world's richest Nordic countries are an new alliance in NATO alliance.
🇫🇮🇸🇪🇩🇰🇧🇻🇮🇸💪
Thank you Putin 🤣
NJAAAEE I dont think so, study the history off SAS, which was the outcome off the meeting in 1953, we havent been able to agree on an airline for the last 40 years, so countrys ??????????????????????
Darn 'mericans, already trying to turn us into conquerers :P
Just a fun hypothetical haha 😂
Would make more sense than being in the EU, but the naive Swedes would be a stick in the wheel