This Whisky gets a 100/100 for me every single time! I absolutely love it. If I could only drink one Whisky going forward it’s going to be Lagavulin 16.
This is the voice of a friend with huge experience and is really trying to help you make the best decision you can so that you have a great experience. Take advantage of this friend's knowledge and kindness. You will not be disappointed, and in fact, you will be very grateful.
On the nose - smoke, damp leather, crackling firewood, peat, honeysuckle On the tongue - the honeysuckle dominates. It's peaty and smoky. Very smoky! Oily consistency, almost perfumy. The flavour remains on your palate long after you've finished and it fades into a delicate floral aroma, reminiscent of lilac. This is my all-time favourite whisky. You can most definitely enjoy it on its own, but I personally have it with a sweet cigar like Romeo y Julieta Mille Fleurs. Lagavulin 16 gets a 10/10 from me.
Hi ralfy I am a devoted student of yours, and I have just got into peated whiskey about 6 months ago, and I must say that out of 100 + bottles of scotch I have completely changed my love for whiskey too peated whiskeys, I watched about 200 + of your videos and some over and over, I don't buy bottles of anything until I watch your videos and I don't go by points alone, but your words during the review, thank you ralfy for your dedication to single malt scotch whiskey and all you give to us scotch whiskey aneracs, please don't stop what you do, we only wish we could have a dram with you, but if I ever get to Scotland I will try and look you up for a wee dram, cheers Sir !!!
Unless you have an older bottle and are doing a side-by-side, I don't pay any mind to "not like it used to be". Our palettes, like our opinions, are so fickle.
With other words, „I don’t want to know it. I don’t want to hear it. I love the whiskey and the brand and I don’t want to learn more. Marketing is everything and I don’t care if my favourite whiskey is getting worse, do with it whatever you want, I‘m going to buy it anyway“. Awesome. It has nothing to do with „different or frickle palates“ when you notice the finish of new bottles is now significantly shorter than it was, for example. Lagavulin was my first love, it was the first step on my whiskey journey. And yeah, with time I noticed the old bottles of LGV16 were better than the newer once. And with time, I became disappointed in an Islay Malt bottled under 46% , chill filtered and with artificial colour added. Let alone the cask management and so on .. Lagavulin 16 has slowly become the biggest „cocktease“ in the whiskey world. A beloved Islay Malt with a really beautiful signature, the New Make is really delicious. And yet they started to use lesser active cask, they don’t let it mature on Islay, they bottle it at 43%, chill filter it and add artificial colour. As Geoff from Gwhisky would say „Not great“ ..
First off, Ralpy, I've watched pretty much all of your reviews and have been a fan for years. You are the best; you really put it in perspective. Lagavulin 16 is my favorite regularly available whisky. My regular is Ardbeg 10, and I enjoy Laphroaig 10 from time to time. I had a dram of Oban 14 for the first time last weekend and just bought a bottle. Looking forward to getting into it. Ralphy gave it an 84 in 2012...at least in 2016, I felt the dram I had deserves a higher rating - we'll see when I open the bottle. Three I've tried in the past few years that I didn't care for... 1) Old Pulteney 12 (bought it while trying different regions, and it's where my family is from). It was somewhat complex but just not enjoyable for me. 2) The cheapest Bowmore (it was ~ USD $30 and it was, at best, two dimensional...lots of green apple and fresh grass...like lawn kind) - That being said, I've tried Bowmore's higher end and they are excellent. For this reason, I am not giving up on Old Pulteney, even though I wasn't a fan of their 12. 3) Bunnahabhain 12 - The molasses was just there forever for me, and no matter how many times I shelved it and gave it a second chance, it was just overpowering. Again though, not giving up on Bunnahabhain just because I didn't like their 12. My favorites thus far (and I try not to spend much more than USD $100 on any bottle), in descending order: --Lagavulin 16 --Ardbeg 10 --Caol Ila 12 & Oban 14 & Laphroaig 10 I've tried the different Ardbegs and Laphroaigs (corryvrekkan, uigeadail, quarter cask, etc), and they are all great - but when I buy them, it's a deviation from their core offering, so it's tough to keep them all in memory...guess that's why Ralphy does it the way he does! I do have a bottle of Supernova 2015 that I really want to open...searching for that review now :) Enjoy responsibly! Huge Fan, Ralphy, thank you for your guidance!!!
The lagavulin 16 is my only mainstay whisky, to me it's one of the best peated whisky's out there. It's really an accessible peated whisky, smooth and smokey and really complex. It doesn't overwhelm the tastebuds like some of the heavier ones.
Enjoyed the review. I've had probably 50 bottles over the years of Lagavulin 16, can attest it's changed. I used to get a lot of ocean sea breeze and roasted seaweed in the nose but not anymore. If you can find it at costco for under $70 its still worth it. I've tried the standard lines of ardbeg, caol ilia and many islays but Lagavulin 16 and a nice balance of richness to the peat balance which I like. But wish it were as good as it was 20 years ago.
Seems a lot of less than favourable comments on this at the moment . . . I opened a bottle I got for my Bday (Feb) recently and was surprised by what I got. This was probably the 1st whisky I've had any real expectations about though - namely a bit of a rich, smoky, peaty thing, something 'like' Uigeadail. 1st impressions were of a rather thin spirit that didn't seem to deliver any of the above, perhaps a bit of a smoky taste. However, realising I was perhaps skewing my judgement I thought I'd reassess with a more open and enquiring mind . . . First off - adding water was a no no! Just thinned it out too much. A bit of air time really helped bring out the sweeter notes. Definite peat/smoke and sweet notes on the nose but not as heavy as say an Ardbeg. I actually really liked the taste - reminiscent of licorice torpedoes at first then a wave of smoke followed by smoky tea and dry notes. A touch of bakers ginger in there as well. Very pleasant. I know Ralfy isn't a fan of 'smooth' so I'll say it went down remarkably easy - no harsh notes whatsoever. Like standing over the penny tray in a sweet shop whilst the living room out back burns and peat smoke creeps through the door! Sorry for long post but this one puzzled me and I feel I've learned a valuable lesson or 2! Avoid Having expectations or pre-judging a whisky and be prepared to give it some time, and at least a few nips before drawing any conclusions. Overall, enjoyable but feel it is over-priced. Seems like batch quality isn't so consistent and a higher abv and NCF would really help this imo!
It's delicious. I discovered it when I was living in London and homesick. The flavour strongly reminded me of the honey from my father's bees which I think is why I love it so much.
Thank you, Ralfy. Being new to single malts, I was reluctant to go the smoky, peaty, Islay malts. I tried the Lagavulin 16 and I love it. Your videos helped me make an educated purchase that made hard earned money, well spent.
Ralfy, I love the glow from your right side. Beautiful touch for the new 2016 videos. Here in California, Lagavulin 16 is very available at Costco and is at a good price, especially when it goes on sale. As such, I've been enjoying this one for quite some time. Thanks for the re-review!
Great reviews. Thank you, Ralfy. You have confirmed what I suspected: the younger is the whiskey, the more it is has that phenolic taste. This is why younger Lagavulins are rare to get and more expensive. The common age is about 10 for most of the Islay whiskeys.
Islay single malts are what made me fall in love with scotch. Ardbeg 10 was my introduction but everything Islay I've tried has been magical and wonderful.
Thanks for the review Ralfy. I wished that we could of had more of a comparison to your previous bottles but at least this bottle has withstood the quality creep that so many other have been unable to.
From one magniloquent matriculate of malt to another, gotta say, Ralfy, this review is spot on. Also, your aside on the effect of warehousing logistics on quality was eye-opening and greatly appreciated.
Another enjoyable Ralfy review and video. I appreciate the depth, quality, and wealth of your wisdom, so much so that I'd watch even if I had no interest in whisky. Excellent work. Keep it up.
(This will be sacrilege to some, but) I've been experimenting with blending Lagavulin (or any heavily peated whiskey) with a nice American rye, or multigrain. I'm in the "please more flavor" spectrum, so it's definitely not an adventure for everyone, but for those who ask for more in all flavor experiences, it's a worthwhile experiment. (So far... but, exploring whiskey, even wrongly sometimes, is a worthwhile experiment. Isn't it?)
I was cleaning out the loft with my dad recently and we came across a lot of miniatures, among which was a 5cl of Lagavulin 16yr old. He had marked the date he received many of these bottles and the Lagavulin was dated 1997. Currently sampling it just now, it's quite nice, but has an extremely strong flavour!
Ralfy I'm going through your reviews and haven't seen a bad one yet - I have learnt so much I can't thank you enough - hope the last 4 years have been good to you kind sir
Hi ralfy I'm back, and I just drank a shot of laguvulan 16 year old 🤪, and I love peated whiskeys I give this bottle 🍼 of laguvulan a 90 points, but as you have stated in your review it's an acquired taste, I have 7 bottles of the laguvulan's of different ages, I love 💘 them all, thanks for your reviews on laguvulan whiskeys, keep up the good work, cheers Sir !!!
Thank you ralfie. We were tasting this very whisky whilst watching and enjoying your review, which, I have to say, we enjoyed very much. We are only 2 year old malt mates, but could certainly discern the subtle saltiness, and moscavado. I got the slight mintiness as well. Were you thinking the sweet celery note was Angelica. I thought I could detect a subtle rummy raisin as well. Anyway, really enjoyed, thank you ralfie, your review enhanced our enjoyment of our glass, which incidentally was a glenmorangie tasting glass from the distillery itself. Regards.
Good question... I don't really know of any really similar malts. Closest thing that comes to mind for me is the Laphroaig Triple Wood. It shares the heavy peat and some of the sherry and woody notes. It's not as old and well-rounded, but I enjoyed it quite a bit.
Hey Ralfy, thanks for all the time you spend reviewing these single malts. I know it takes a great deal of time, so thank you. I just picked up a bottle of this and it's a great malt. I am really enjoying Islay whisky and this is a really good one.
there are many people that don't give the whisky time and don't add water even if it has like 46 vol....how do i know whats right? is it a matter of taste? or is it a matter of alc % or just the whisky itself? whats the right way, please teach me senpai
Sorry I'm not Ralfy but in response to your question I would say that a Whisky experience is a personal experience, a unique experience that differs from one person to the next. It all depends on the temperature of the room, what food you've eated and even your mood! You should always have a glass of water and a teaspoon with your Whisky, this way you can start with a drop - and then adjust to your taste. This is what I have learnt from Ralfy.
I love the deep smoke and how thick it is, I would have given it 1-2 more points here in Iceland because it is a perfect winter dram :) anyways thumbs up for a good review
My last 2 bottles have been very nice the 1 before those was pretty flat. Sounds like he might have gotten a bad batch or something cause his remarks match the one I had in early 2017
Recently had a Lag 16 in Alaska. 15 for a double no less. Hard to give an opinion as my bartender who was having a rough day used the soda dispenser water and filled half the glass with it instead of chilled water with a spon on the side. Oh well. Tasted like warm beer haha.
For me, in 2024, Laggy is medicinal, like Laphroaig 10, but even more so. In fact, I am not surprised people can confuse the two in blind tastings. Surprisingly, for my nose, Laphroaig 10 is less hospital than Lagavulin 16. The Laggy has the Band Aid and putty notes. "Just sharing. So's you know." Love it, Ralphy! P.S. Whisky makes you smarter. I didn't know what a bothy was before watching Ralphy. I looked it up and now I know. So I'm ready for a crossword puzzle or Scrabble game. Whisky makes you smarter!
Latakia pipe tobacco helped me get ovet my 30 year addiction to cigarerrets. Good peated whisky helped me to get off latakia. I have😊n't smoked scince the mid '80's.
The first whisky I got. I got it for my 20th birthday 3 years ago, now sipping it. It's peppery/numbing/heating/spicy. Even though it's 43% it feels higher ABV/spicier than a cask strength 51.4% Nikka from the Barrel. But yeah it's good whisky. I'm not the biggest peat fan. I like sweeter unpeated whiskies more (for now at least). Just got a bottle of GlenAllachie 12 YO.
A great re-review. Question: At a Distillery known for strong peat, after grinding of the grain, and during fermentation or after, do you smell the peat in the product as it's being processed? There's strong peat in the final product, so my guess is the distillery vats etc. must give off a strong peat smell... no?
Great stuff Ralfy, I was hoping you would re-review this one. Are you planning on doing any Glenfiddich re-reviews? their entire range has new packaging and its making me wonder has the product changed too.
The 12 year cask strength is my favorite whiskey, and I do believe you gave it a very high rating of 91! I just wanted you share with you that I heard the reason you never store whiskey bottles sideways is so the liquid never touches the cork because the cork can flavor the whiskey in an undesirable fashion like a "corked" wine. Another reason is that the high alcohol percentage can break down soft cork and dry it out, adding disintegrated cork to your whiskey, unwanted flavor, and like you mentioned eventually leaking. All bad things that can be easily avoided. One more thing that I learned to use is a wine vacuum corking device on my more precious open bottles. I was told the extra air in the bottle and time exposed to air will heavily change the characteristics of the whiskey and storing the bottle under a vacuum will best preserve the original whiskey's integrity. I think you might have mentioned that as well during another review, but I thought I'd bring it up again. Just sharing. Thanks for the review Ralfy!
I very much enjoy the reviews. Very novice but have had a little love affair with Tobermory 15 and it has given me a toehold into fancying a random chat up with other fun spirits. I come here to see what might be something that will not go to waste. Thank you for explaining things in the fashion i can enjoy. I don't care about fashion. I just like what tastes lovely.
I love Lagavulin! Although I disagree that peaty whisky is an acquired taste because I instantly loved peated whisky the first time I tasted it! The Ileach (cask strength) is also good but you have to splash enough water to it to reduce the harshness but too much water will mute the flavor.
@Harley Dangan - I found I loved Lagavulin the first time I tried it - at the Whiskey Library in Portland, OR. That said, I've not tried many Scotches since, because, I know what I love! I recommend the "Double Matured - Distiller's Edition - I *just* ran out the other day, going to go searching for it today actually.
I don't drink Whiskey really. Certainly not to this depth. But I was doing research on Glenfiddich for an ad campaign I was doing a while ago. I stumbled across your channel and ever since I check back in. I find your reviews very interesting. Even as someone who only drinks Jack Daniels and coke on a Friday night. haha.
I bought this in around 1990, as one of my first “proper” single malts. I was only young then, and tasting it was almost as shock. My first impression was that I did not like it so I left the bottle, didn’t touch it. So when my father came to visit I poured him a drink and his first expression was that his face lightened up and he expressed that he absolutely loved it, that it was fantastic. I was surprised of this but as I knew he was “a more experienced drinker” he knew what he was talking about so I approached the bottle with more respect. I think when I got down to about half the bottle I was sold. The whisky was the best I ever experienced and I was amazed. Anyway I now know that this 1990 tax free bottling was different than the Lagavulin 16 we can buy now. So I regularly bought Lagavulin’s like the DE bottlings and others. But the regular 16 was not seen that often so I didn’t buy one for a long time. Anyway I recently ordered a 16 from Master of Malt. I opened it a couple of weeks ago and when compared to the competition like Ardbeg 10, Laphroaig 10 and the likes I was disappointed. I did not recognise the Lagavulin 16 from 2021 with the 1990 version that I remembered. It tasted almost perfumed, not sure what happened to this whisky? So I left it for a while. Next drink I had I still felt it had a weird taste, something artificial and perfumed? But I kept going and when I got down to half the bottle I started to enjoy it. The weird taste is gone, and the peat, smoke and burnt taste takes the upper hand. So I still feel that the 1990 version was better, but I still enjoy Lagavulin 16 a lot. So I decided to buy some more bottles as I am sure I will learn to love the new version., just too bad it’s become so expensive… Then again so is every whisky aged to 16!
A good follow up review Ralfy. The new bottles still taste essentially the same, still like Lagavulin 16YO, but the bottles I had a few years ago were fuller, richer, more rounded tasting and with more mouth feel. It's still good, but not as satisfying as it was.
I had that set of Six Classic Single Malts miniatures(~20 y.a.) and Lagavulin 16 was really shockingly amazing!!! Two years later I got a regular (750ml) Lagavulin 16. It was good but "no magic". Bought one last week. =)
Ralfy... Diageo's portfolio includes American distilleries such as Bulleit bourbon, and George Dickel Tennessee Whisky - I'd say it's safe to assume that Scottish distilleries such as Lagavulin (among others in Scotland under ownership of Diageo) use their barrels. Is there any 'rhyme or reason' as to which Diageo distiller in Scotland uses which American distiller? What I'm getting at is - will Lagavulin exclusively use George Dickel barrels, or do they mix, and match (maybe using Bulleit barrels as well) without any care?
I used to really love Lagavulin 16. I got a bottle late last year, and halfway down it's nowhere near as enjoyable as I remember it from only a few years ago. It used to sparkle in my mouth! Now it just sits there. The peat has a much weaker flavor than it used to. I'm still picking up some fruity and licorice notes, but I get the impression that the aftertaste falls flat rather than lingering on... It's not like the Lagavulin has become a *bad* whisky, but I would prefer a Laphroaig quarter cask or a Port Charlotte any day for my money.
I really like Lagavulin 16 very much. But I consider it a luxury experience, and therefore do not drink it often. A more affordable Islay single malt that is readily available where I live is Bowmore. But the best value for money in my opinion is Blended scotches. They are so many out there with flavour profiles to suit the majority of tastes.
reptilianskin I love the Bowmore 12 (my intro to scotch) planning to get the Lagavulin in a few month, should jump straight to it or acclimate with another intermediate whiskey?
i would recommend trying highland park after bowmore, or maybe caol ila 12. lagavulin isnt much more peaty than caol ila 12 imo. but they are a good bit more peaty than bowmore 12, which was my 1st peated scotch
I understand what you mean. My cousin had a bottle of Glenlivet 12 from the early 90's in his cabinet. It was much more complex than the bottle I had purchased earlier that month. Scotch is much more in demand these days so quality has been tossed aside. This is not to say that the Scotch is bad; it could be much better and not so hurried.
Hi Ralfy, would it be possible for you to include the price paid during your reviews to let viewers include this into their decision process for acquiring a new bottle for trial.
Thank you for your excellent channel. I had a bottle of this 10 years ago and absolutely loved it. I had a bottle (200cl) this afternoon and was overwhelmed by a strong whiff of TCP. The whiskey was still characteristically smooth rich in flavour. I have read up on this and it appears that this can be a characteristic of maturation beside the sea. i’d be most interested to hear your point of view. Cheers in anticipation
Interesting. "Not the same, aint what it use to be" comments in this review. Hmm I have not tried the Lag 16 yet, I have been recommended to try the Lag 16 for a while but its a bit on the pricey side. I like my Ardbeg 10, Laph 10 and I really enjoy Highland Park. My next purchase was going to be either Lagavulin 16, Ardbeg Corryveckran, or HIghland Park 18.. or maybe try a Spring Bank 10 for the first time. What do you say Ralfy?
I enjoyed both of these reviews - thank you as always. One thing I did notice is that for the re-review, your initial remarks were made after adding water, where as in the initial one, you went straight from the bottle. I am hoping that at some point, you or one of the (few) good reviewers, will do a side-by-side on the modern Laga 16 and the one from the 1980s. An expensive proposition, I expect. If you know of one, I'd love the link. This was when I first tasted Laga and to be honest, I just think the new iteration is harsher and less balanced, but it was sooooooooo long ago. Thank you again!
just picked this up at costco for ($58.99). First experience with a single malt with this much smoke/peat. Loved it!! Up until this point I would have told you my favorite scotch blended/single malt would have been green label/Macallan 12yr... I think this replaces both those even though it is completely different. thanks for the reviews ralfy.
My first glass of this tonight and I love it.... The first Scotch I ever tasted was Laphroig 10 y.o. It took forever to get over that experience, that was too much too soon in my journey of Scotch Whisky. But, seeking knowledge and understanding about all whiskies, I learned about the five regions, basically, five flavor types of Scotch Whisky, of which there are many variables...... So, 2 years ago, I really started experiencing Scotches from all regions,,,, Fast forward,,,, I simply love this Lagavulin 16Y.O. Scotch. I will say sweet, great peat flavor, minty, yes minty to me, and not hard to get along with,,, I do not need to try to convince myself to like it...But, I need to find a Smokier one now, maybe the Lagavulin 12Y.O.????? Any help?????
My first dram was Laphroaig 10 y.o. too, and I know what you mean! I would recommend Ardbeg 10 y.o. or why not Ardbeg Uigeadail if you want to try something different but still very good and about in the same price range as Lagavulin 16. I've just ordered the Lagavulin 8 y.o. and the Distiller's Edition and will get back with feedback.
Vladimir Stanisav Thanks Vladi,,,, Yes, I have an open bottle of Ardbeg 10... and I like it a lot.. I think the Lag 16 is just a bit better all around,, both are good... I will be getting that Ardbeg Uigeadail this week, and also the Corryvreckran to try also... Thank you for reaching out and yes I would like to hear more about you experiences with these or other ones you really enjoy.
ralfydotcom Thank you Ralfy,,, I am driving a 450 mile round trip in 10 minutes from now to get to these wonderful expressions, so I will add these two recommendations, thus making the drive that much more worthwhile... Longrow 10, and Lagavulin distillers edition coming right up.... Thank you for this input...
Will forever have a soft spot for Lagavulin. One of the legends of the industry and the all time great drams. Ownership may not be what it once was… but the future may change that.
Thanks for the review, could you please give the bottle code? Sadly I feel a need to balance it with a bit of a warning. According my personal experience with a friend's Dec. 2015 Laga (L5244CM000) which might still linger on some shelves, there was at least one sub-par batch around this time. Compared to my 2012 bottling and it was less peaty, less spicy with a noticeably shorter finish. For me definitely a drop in quality, although not the horrible experience some amazon.de buyers had presumably suffered during the christmas season with multiple frustrated reviews (alas, no codes given). Anyhow it makes me consider selling my closed bottle of the same batch and buy something else instead.
The Distillers Edition is indeed superb, my dram bargain of last year was finding a camp site bar in Cumbria selling Lagavulin 16 for £2 a dram, to say I indulged would be an understatement.
I've been experimenting with whisky for the last year and I have a bottle of this stuff (I bought months ago) but have not opened it yet, I'm working my way up to it.
I'm keeping mine cold and in their boxes/cans, after pouring a dram I always give it a press of private preserve, and I have to say, it seems to work well, I have an Uigeadail that's about 2/3 empty by now, it's around 8 months and still tastes like the first dram.
+DusteDs Stuff Curious if you are missing out. If it is really like the first dram you probably are. I find most good scotch to be better after the first 1/3 and some much better on the second 1/2 of the bottle. That must be from oxygen allowing it to open some. Any chance you are preventing that benefit? Obviously there is a point where air would harm it, then spray away.
+Brian D one more thought, does it really not affect the liquid? Seems like the wrong water will change the taste, have a tough time thinking that spraying anything in the bottle is better than leaving it alone. Just curious.
Brian D Maybe I am, I am not sure, I drink a dram very slowly, and experience a lot of change during the hour or so :) I did not use it in my laphroiag 10, and I found it when it was down to 3/4s. About the spray, the gasses are noble, gasses such as argon, their very property is that they are inert, do not chemically react with anything, and are heavier than air, putting a blanket of non-reactive gas on top of the liquid. Now, air expands and contracts with temperature and since the cork is not 100% airtight, this effectively exchanges the gas in the bottle over time, but the heavier intert gasses will lay in the bottom still.
Hi Ralfy.. love the blogs Sir ,very informative . Have you heard anything about a shortage in stock globally on this whisky? I live in Prague Czech Republic and recently noticed one or two retailers here have hiked up their price on the standard bottling of the 16 y o. Global wines 3999czk = £137.. !!! They are either crazy or something is going on. Plenty of other Retailers here have it for what I would call a more realistic price. 2190czk = £75 .. surely the manufacturer ought to have some control over R.R P. ? What are your thoughts?
Its Diageo New Pricing Policy. They want their Classic Malts became luxury Whisky. Thats why Laga16 price went up from aprox £69 to £80+ in UK, Oban14 ftom aprox £49 to £70+ and Talisker18 from aprox £80 to...£175. Welcome to Diageo New World. Enjoy. 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
Hi Ralfy, I only recently discovered your channel and enjoy your video's very much! I would like to know if you have ever reviewed the Glen Turret Distillery. I loved their 15 year old Malt during my visits there in 1984 and again in 1987 but cannot find it anywhere here in the USA.
+TwoFootCal301 I saw some at a TotalWine by an independant distiller... cant remember the name though. Next time I go I'll try to find it again and update this post.
Hey there Ralfy, thank you for touching on a first favorite peated whisky of mine. I noticed you scored Lagavulin 16yo lower than you did last time a few years ago when you gave it a 90. Is that because it's not made quite so well as it was back then, have your tastes changed over the years, is your opinion affected by the storage ("dunnage"did you call it) method, or perhaps something else? I have to add that as my taste developed over the years I'm finding my opinion of L16 though still quite high is not as high as it once was. Just interested in how you see it differs now.
+ralfystuff ...which was confirmed by warehouse manager Ian McArthur during my tour in 2014, who stated that casks were nowadays (in contrast to older days) re-filled multiple times. And he apparently took no pride in sharing this truth.
One Ralfy did not mention, is how good the price-to-quality ratio is on this one. Every time I see something similar (peated, sherry whisky) it tends to cost more, yet the quality is comparable at best. It's probably coming down do the mass-production that makes it cheaper, but hell - I don't really mind. On this one, I also really love how it changes when you leave it in a glass and smell it. Starts with heavy peat, then opens up and brings the sherry notes. After a while you hardly notice the smoke smell, and it actually acts as a carriage for the other notes (dried fruit, sherry, vanilla from oak). Very comparable whisky would be BenRiach Heredotus Fumosus, although slightly sharper and peppery on the tongue. Probably because it's been matured shorter, in bigger casks. A good whisky nevertheless.
Mackenzie Benedict jumping to Islay from Glenfiddich might not be the best move. Try a dram of one of the classic Islays (Lagavulin, Ardbeg, Laphroag) at bar and see if you like it first. Peat smoke is an acquired taste! Best to start with a lighter expression to get your feet wet. Id recommend Highland Park or Bunnahabhain. Great stepping stones into the world of smokey scotch. Cheers!
Thanks Ralfy. Three comments: 1) I am not really a fan of Lagavulin 16 yo. Too heavy, lacks some elegance and finesse. Just my opinion. 2) I suggest you explore the issue of cork in the future. It would be interesting to hear more from you. Cork vs plastic has been a serious issue in the wine industry. Where comes cork from, when used in whisky bottles? Cork is a major question here in Portugal. It might look a non-issue for Scottish people and for the whisky industry, but I am not certain. Please question some producers about it and tell us something. 3) Canned haggis on the shelf behind you? Is it good? haha :D
Laphroaig 10 CS, Port Charlotte islay Barley (more earthy vegetal peat, than fire smoke), Ledaig 10, Ardberg Uigedal or Correywrecken, Kilchoman Sanaig.... :)
dont know if i was lucky but my batch was amazing much like that of yesteryear batch began with l6155 but was similar too johnnie walker black but more notes to it even leathery tastes seemed unreal i suspect newer casks were involved but this was somthing different to the newer stuff i have tasted recently
Ah, Lagavulin. I remember trying the 16 yo a couple of years ago and I liked it a lot. I think I'll get another bottle after finishing my current woodsmoked whisky. It's nice but it's not the same.
You are the single best whisky review out there.
This Whisky gets a 100/100 for me every single time! I absolutely love it. If I could only drink one Whisky going forward it’s going to be Lagavulin 16.
Possibly the greatest or at least sits on the panel of thrones of the one of the greatest
This is the voice of a friend with huge experience and is really trying to help you make the best decision you can so that you have a great experience. Take advantage of this friend's knowledge and kindness. You will not be disappointed, and in fact, you will be very grateful.
On the nose - smoke, damp leather, crackling firewood, peat, honeysuckle
On the tongue - the honeysuckle dominates. It's peaty and smoky. Very smoky! Oily consistency, almost perfumy. The flavour remains on your palate long after you've finished and it fades into a delicate floral aroma, reminiscent of lilac.
This is my all-time favourite whisky. You can most definitely enjoy it on its own, but I personally have it with a sweet cigar like Romeo y Julieta Mille Fleurs.
Lagavulin 16 gets a 10/10 from me.
It’s a masterpiece
@@ramencurry6672 indeed
@@ramencurry6672 Yeah, I felt that way, too. But I don’t think it’s a Masterpiece anymore. Not at all. It’s still a damn good Islay.
Hi ralfy
I am a devoted student of yours, and I have just got into peated whiskey about 6 months ago, and I must say that out of 100 + bottles of scotch I have completely changed my love for whiskey too peated whiskeys, I watched about 200 + of your videos and some over and over, I don't buy bottles of anything until I watch your videos and I don't go by points alone, but your words during the review, thank you ralfy for your dedication to single malt scotch whiskey and all you give to us scotch whiskey aneracs, please don't stop what you do, we only wish we could have a dram with you, but if I ever get to Scotland I will try and look you up for a wee dram, cheers Sir !!!
Unless you have an older bottle and are doing a side-by-side, I don't pay any mind to "not like it used to be". Our palettes, like our opinions, are so fickle.
With other words, „I don’t want to know it. I don’t want to hear it. I love the whiskey and the brand and I don’t want to learn more. Marketing is everything and I don’t care if my favourite whiskey is getting worse, do with it whatever you want, I‘m going to buy it anyway“.
Awesome. It has nothing to do with „different or frickle palates“ when you notice the finish of new bottles is now significantly shorter than it was, for example.
Lagavulin was my first love, it was the first step on my whiskey journey. And yeah, with time I noticed the old bottles of LGV16 were better than the newer once. And with time, I became disappointed in an Islay Malt bottled under 46% , chill filtered and with artificial colour added. Let alone the cask management and so on ..
Lagavulin 16 has slowly become the biggest „cocktease“ in the whiskey world. A beloved Islay Malt with a really beautiful signature, the New Make is really delicious. And yet they started to use lesser active cask, they don’t let it mature on Islay, they bottle it at 43%, chill filter it and add artificial colour. As Geoff from Gwhisky would say „Not great“ ..
First off, Ralpy, I've watched pretty much all of your reviews and have been a fan for years. You are the best; you really put it in perspective.
Lagavulin 16 is my favorite regularly available whisky. My regular is Ardbeg 10, and I enjoy Laphroaig 10 from time to time.
I had a dram of Oban 14 for the first time last weekend and just bought a bottle. Looking forward to getting into it. Ralphy gave it an 84 in 2012...at least in 2016, I felt the dram I had deserves a higher rating - we'll see when I open the bottle.
Three I've tried in the past few years that I didn't care for...
1) Old Pulteney 12 (bought it while trying different regions, and it's where my family is from). It was somewhat complex but just not enjoyable for me.
2) The cheapest Bowmore (it was ~ USD $30 and it was, at best, two dimensional...lots of green apple and fresh grass...like lawn kind) - That being said, I've tried Bowmore's higher end and they are excellent. For this reason, I am not giving up on Old Pulteney, even though I wasn't a fan of their 12.
3) Bunnahabhain 12 - The molasses was just there forever for me, and no matter how many times I shelved it and gave it a second chance, it was just overpowering. Again though, not giving up on Bunnahabhain just because I didn't like their 12.
My favorites thus far (and I try not to spend much more than USD $100 on any bottle), in descending order:
--Lagavulin 16
--Ardbeg 10
--Caol Ila 12 & Oban 14 & Laphroaig 10
I've tried the different Ardbegs and Laphroaigs (corryvrekkan, uigeadail, quarter cask, etc), and they are all great - but when I buy them, it's a deviation from their core offering, so it's tough to keep them all in memory...guess that's why Ralphy does it the way he does! I do have a bottle of Supernova 2015 that I really want to open...searching for that review now :)
Enjoy responsibly!
Huge Fan, Ralphy, thank you for your guidance!!!
Just cracked open my very first bottle of Lagavulin. I now understand the hype!
I have been through quite a selection of Scotches and without a doubt, Lagavulin is my all time favorite.
please tell me you'll be reviewing that tin of haggis!
+JFK Jr . . . yes, one day !
The lagavulin 16 is my only mainstay whisky, to me it's one of the best peated whisky's out there. It's really an accessible peated whisky, smooth and smokey and really complex. It doesn't overwhelm the tastebuds like some of the heavier ones.
Enjoyed the review. I've had probably 50 bottles over the years of Lagavulin 16, can attest it's changed. I used to get a lot of ocean sea breeze and roasted seaweed in the nose but not anymore. If you can find it at costco for under $70 its still worth it. I've tried the standard lines of ardbeg, caol ilia and many islays but Lagavulin 16 and a nice balance of richness to the peat balance which I like. But wish it were as good as it was 20 years ago.
. . . I wish it was still as good as 20 years ago too !
I could listen to this chap talk all day.
Seems a lot of less than favourable comments on this at the moment . . .
I opened a bottle I got for my Bday (Feb) recently and was surprised by what I got. This was probably the 1st whisky I've had any real expectations about though - namely a bit of a rich, smoky, peaty thing, something 'like' Uigeadail. 1st impressions were of a rather thin spirit that didn't seem to deliver any of the above, perhaps a bit of a smoky taste. However, realising I was perhaps skewing my judgement I thought I'd reassess with a more open and enquiring mind . . .
First off - adding water was a no no! Just thinned it out too much. A bit of air time really helped bring out the sweeter notes. Definite peat/smoke and sweet notes on the nose but not as heavy as say an Ardbeg. I actually really liked the taste - reminiscent of licorice torpedoes at first then a wave of smoke followed by smoky tea and dry notes. A touch of bakers ginger in there as well. Very pleasant. I know Ralfy isn't a fan of 'smooth' so I'll say it went down remarkably easy - no harsh notes whatsoever. Like standing over the penny tray in a sweet shop whilst the living room out back burns and peat smoke creeps through the door!
Sorry for long post but this one puzzled me and I feel I've learned a valuable lesson or 2! Avoid Having expectations or pre-judging a whisky and be prepared to give it some time, and at least a few nips before drawing any conclusions. Overall, enjoyable but feel it is over-priced. Seems like batch quality isn't so consistent and a higher abv and NCF would really help this imo!
Maybe time for a re-review again, 5 years on?
Especially now it’s back in stock. Last few months it was hard to find
It's delicious. I discovered it when I was living in London and homesick. The flavour strongly reminded me of the honey from my father's bees which I think is why I love it so much.
If anyone is looking for a great cigar pairing, the Lagavulin 16 with a Perdomo Small Batch Maduro is most excellent!
Thank you, Ralfy. Being new to single malts, I was reluctant to go the smoky, peaty, Islay malts. I tried the Lagavulin 16 and I love it. Your videos helped me make an educated purchase that made hard earned money, well spent.
Ralfy, I love the glow from your right side. Beautiful touch for the new 2016 videos. Here in California, Lagavulin 16 is very available at Costco and is at a good price, especially when it goes on sale. As such, I've been enjoying this one for quite some time. Thanks for the re-review!
Great reviews. Thank you, Ralfy. You have confirmed what I suspected: the younger is the whiskey, the more it is has that phenolic taste. This is why younger Lagavulins are rare to get and more expensive. The common age is about 10 for most of the Islay whiskeys.
Islay single malts are what made me fall in love with scotch. Ardbeg 10 was my introduction but everything Islay I've tried has been magical and wonderful.
Here it is, November 2018 and about to pick up my first bottle of Lagavulin 16. Wish me luck...
. . . good luck !
I just picked up my first bottle this week. Whisky Nirvana.
I didn't like the first 2 drams but by gosh it's grown on me now it's beautiful!
Only just discovered your channel, you are brilliant.
I just bought it for 50 euros which is around 38 GBP(56 USD, 71 CAD, ) AND IT IS WORTH EVERY DAM CENT.... thank you Ralfy.....absolutely loving it....
Thanks for the review Ralfy.
I wished that we could of had more of a comparison to your previous bottles but at least this bottle has withstood the quality creep that so many other have been unable to.
From one magniloquent matriculate of malt to another, gotta say, Ralfy, this review is spot on. Also, your aside on the effect of warehousing logistics on quality was eye-opening and greatly appreciated.
Time for a 2020 re-review of this popular staple to see if the trend of refurbishing casks has continued?
It's best not to touch the new bottlings of Lagavulin 16 with a bargepole.
Another enjoyable Ralfy review and video. I appreciate the depth, quality, and wealth of your wisdom, so much so that I'd watch even if I had no interest in whisky. Excellent work. Keep it up.
(This will be sacrilege to some, but) I've been experimenting with blending Lagavulin (or any heavily peated whiskey) with a nice American rye, or multigrain. I'm in the "please more flavor" spectrum, so it's definitely not an adventure for everyone, but for those who ask for more in all flavor experiences, it's a worthwhile experiment. (So far... but, exploring whiskey, even wrongly sometimes, is a worthwhile experiment. Isn't it?)
Why the hell not, if you feel like doing so. What do you mix Lagavulin 16 with and what comes out?
I was cleaning out the loft with my dad recently and we came across a lot of miniatures, among which was a 5cl of Lagavulin 16yr old. He had marked the date he received many of these bottles and the Lagavulin was dated 1997. Currently sampling it just now, it's quite nice, but has an extremely strong flavour!
. . . treasure !
Ralfy I'm going through your reviews and haven't seen a bad one yet - I have learnt so much I can't thank you enough - hope the last 4 years have been good to you kind sir
. . . happy to share !
Hi ralfy
I'm back, and I just drank a shot of laguvulan 16 year old 🤪, and I love peated whiskeys I give this bottle 🍼 of laguvulan a 90 points, but as you have stated in your review it's an acquired taste, I have 7 bottles of the laguvulan's of different ages, I love 💘 them all, thanks for your reviews on laguvulan whiskeys, keep up the good work, cheers Sir !!!
Thank you ralfie. We were tasting this very whisky whilst watching and enjoying your review, which, I have to say, we enjoyed very much. We are only 2 year old malt mates, but could certainly discern the subtle saltiness, and moscavado. I got the slight mintiness as well. Were you thinking the sweet celery note was Angelica. I thought I could detect a subtle rummy raisin as well. Anyway, really enjoyed, thank you ralfie, your review enhanced our enjoyment of our glass, which incidentally was a glenmorangie tasting glass from the distillery itself. Regards.
You remind me of my late grandpa. Such a treat listening to you speak, tell stories and give words of wisdom. Thank you!
This is my favorite whisky, any other with same personality?
Good question... I don't really know of any really similar malts. Closest thing that comes to mind for me is the Laphroaig Triple Wood. It shares the heavy peat and some of the sherry and woody notes. It's not as old and well-rounded, but I enjoyed it quite a bit.
"One final comment... no not really." and then he goes on to make 5 more comments. haha. Love you Ralfy.
I noticed Ralfy's mark for Lagavulin 16 droppped from 90 to 87 over the recent years.
. . . it's not what it was !
Yes, it did.
Still my favorite after 25 years... Lagavulin has so much more depth than the other heavily peated whiskys - far from a novelty.
+Eyewanders Foto You said it! +1
Hey Ralfy, thanks for all the time you spend reviewing these single malts. I know it takes a great deal of time, so thank you. I just picked up a bottle of this and it's a great malt. I am really enjoying Islay whisky and this is a really good one.
The smell of this is just amazing. Fills the whole room.
When I order one at the bar I can smell them bringing it.
there are many people that don't give the whisky time and don't add water even if it has like 46 vol....how do i know whats right? is it a matter of taste? or is it a matter of alc % or just the whisky itself? whats the right way, please teach me senpai
Sorry I'm not Ralfy but in response to your question I would say that a Whisky experience is a personal experience, a unique experience that differs from one person to the next. It all depends on the temperature of the room, what food you've eated and even your mood! You should always have a glass of water and a teaspoon with your Whisky, this way you can start with a drop - and then adjust to your taste. This is what I have learnt from Ralfy.
nice, thank you bebe
las tym I had L16 it was fairly "thin" on th palet.(mouthfeel)
has it thickend up any ovr th yrs?
I love the deep smoke and how thick it is, I would have given it 1-2 more points here in Iceland because it is a perfect winter dram :) anyways thumbs up for a good review
My last 2 bottles have been very nice the 1 before those was pretty flat. Sounds like he might have gotten a bad batch or something cause his remarks match the one I had in early 2017
Made me really crave some Lagavulin. Looking forward to getting home from work and pouring a dram of my 97/13 distiller's edition
Recently had a Lag 16 in Alaska. 15 for a double no less. Hard to give an opinion as my bartender who was having a rough day used the soda dispenser water and filled half the glass with it instead of chilled water with a spon on the side. Oh well. Tasted like warm beer haha.
For me, in 2024, Laggy is medicinal, like Laphroaig 10, but even more so. In fact, I am not surprised people can confuse the two in blind tastings. Surprisingly, for my nose, Laphroaig 10 is less hospital than Lagavulin 16. The Laggy has the Band Aid and putty notes. "Just sharing. So's you know." Love it, Ralphy! P.S. Whisky makes you smarter. I didn't know what a bothy was before watching Ralphy. I looked it up and now I know. So I'm ready for a crossword puzzle or Scrabble game. Whisky makes you smarter!
Latakia pipe tobacco helped me get ovet my 30 year addiction to cigarerrets. Good peated whisky helped me to get off latakia. I have😊n't smoked scince the mid '80's.
The first whisky I got. I got it for my 20th birthday 3 years ago, now sipping it. It's peppery/numbing/heating/spicy. Even though it's 43% it feels higher ABV/spicier than a cask strength 51.4% Nikka from the Barrel. But yeah it's good whisky. I'm not the biggest peat fan. I like sweeter unpeated whiskies more (for now at least). Just got a bottle of GlenAllachie 12 YO.
Ralfy. You have brought my appreciation of whisky to a new dimension single handedly. Thank you
A great re-review. Question: At a Distillery known for strong peat, after grinding of the grain, and during fermentation or after, do you smell the peat in the product as it's being processed?
There's strong peat in the final product, so my guess is the distillery vats etc. must give off a strong peat smell... no?
This whisky really is like nectar of the gods for me personally. Mouth waters just thinking about it.
I agree!
Great stuff Ralfy, I was hoping you would re-review this one. Are you planning on doing any Glenfiddich re-reviews? their entire range has new packaging and its making me wonder has the product changed too.
One of the best i had recently, this makes me want to buy another bottle. Cheers Ralfy
Beautiful, smoky and intense Islay malt. My favourite😋
The 12 year cask strength is my favorite whiskey, and I do believe you gave it a very high rating of 91!
I just wanted you share with you that I heard the reason you never store whiskey bottles sideways is so the liquid never touches the cork because the cork can flavor the whiskey in an undesirable fashion like a "corked" wine. Another reason is that the high alcohol percentage can break down soft cork and dry it out, adding disintegrated cork to your whiskey, unwanted flavor, and like you mentioned eventually leaking. All bad things that can be easily avoided. One more thing that I learned to use is a wine vacuum corking device on my more precious open bottles. I was told the extra air in the bottle and time exposed to air will heavily change the characteristics of the whiskey and storing the bottle under a vacuum will best preserve the original whiskey's integrity. I think you might have mentioned that as well during another review, but I thought I'd bring it up again. Just sharing. Thanks for the review Ralfy!
I very much enjoy the reviews. Very novice but have had a little love affair with Tobermory 15 and it has given me a toehold into fancying a random chat up with other fun spirits. I come here to see what might be something that will not go to waste. Thank you for explaining things in the fashion i can enjoy. I don't care about fashion. I just like what tastes lovely.
I love Lagavulin! Although I disagree that peaty whisky is an acquired taste because I instantly loved peated whisky the first time I tasted it!
The Ileach (cask strength) is also good but you have to splash enough water to it to reduce the harshness but too much water will mute the flavor.
@Harley Dangan - I found I loved Lagavulin the first time I tried it - at the Whiskey Library in Portland, OR. That said, I've not tried many Scotches since, because, I know what I love! I recommend the "Double Matured - Distiller's Edition - I *just* ran out the other day, going to go searching for it today actually.
The first peaty Islay I tasted was Ardbeg 10. Wow! I loved it.
Great review Ralfy, I've been enjoying a little of this from time to time as well.
I don't drink Whiskey really. Certainly not to this depth. But I was doing research on Glenfiddich for an ad campaign I was doing a while ago. I stumbled across your channel and ever since I check back in. I find your reviews very interesting. Even as someone who only drinks Jack Daniels and coke on a Friday night. haha.
I bought this in around 1990, as one of my first “proper” single malts. I was only young then, and tasting it was almost as shock. My first impression was that I did not like it so I left the bottle, didn’t touch it. So when my father came to visit I poured him a drink and his first expression was that his face lightened up and he expressed that he absolutely loved it, that it was fantastic. I was surprised of this but as I knew he was “a more experienced drinker” he knew what he was talking about so I approached the bottle with more respect. I think when I got down to about half the bottle I was sold. The whisky was the best I ever experienced and I was amazed. Anyway I now know that this 1990 tax free bottling was different than the Lagavulin 16 we can buy now. So I regularly bought Lagavulin’s like the DE bottlings and others. But the regular 16 was not seen that often so I didn’t buy one for a long time. Anyway I recently ordered a 16 from Master of Malt. I opened it a couple of weeks ago and when compared to the competition like Ardbeg 10, Laphroaig 10 and the likes I was disappointed. I did not recognise the Lagavulin 16 from 2021 with the 1990 version that I remembered. It tasted almost perfumed, not sure what happened to this whisky? So I left it for a while. Next drink I had I still felt it had a weird taste, something artificial and perfumed? But I kept going and when I got down to half the bottle I started to enjoy it. The weird taste is gone, and the peat, smoke and burnt taste takes the upper hand. So I still feel that the 1990 version was better, but I still enjoy Lagavulin 16 a lot. So I decided to buy some more bottles as I am sure I will learn to love the new version., just too bad it’s become so expensive… Then again so is every whisky aged to 16!
A good follow up review Ralfy. The new bottles still taste essentially the same, still like Lagavulin 16YO, but the bottles I had a few years ago were fuller, richer, more rounded tasting and with more mouth feel. It's still good, but not as satisfying as it was.
I enjoyed the peat, love the deep, smoky taste. TAKES OUT THE FIRE but LEAVES IN THE WARMTH!. Love the Dalek on the shelf.
Oh my god, I've just noticed the haggis and the Dalek.
Legend.
That's some palate!!
I had that set of Six Classic Single Malts miniatures(~20 y.a.) and Lagavulin 16 was really shockingly amazing!!! Two years later I got a regular (750ml) Lagavulin 16. It was good but "no magic". Bought one last week. =)
Ralfy...
Diageo's portfolio includes American distilleries such as Bulleit bourbon, and George Dickel Tennessee Whisky - I'd say it's safe to assume that Scottish distilleries such as Lagavulin (among others in Scotland under ownership of Diageo) use their barrels.
Is there any 'rhyme or reason' as to which Diageo distiller in Scotland uses which American distiller?
What I'm getting at is - will Lagavulin exclusively use George Dickel barrels, or do they mix, and match (maybe using Bulleit barrels as well) without any care?
I used to really love Lagavulin 16. I got a bottle late last year, and halfway down it's nowhere near as enjoyable as I remember it from only a few years ago. It used to sparkle in my mouth! Now it just sits there. The peat has a much weaker flavor than it used to. I'm still picking up some fruity and licorice notes, but I get the impression that the aftertaste falls flat rather than lingering on... It's not like the Lagavulin has become a *bad* whisky, but I would prefer a Laphroaig quarter cask or a Port Charlotte any day for my money.
Hello Ralfy, would it be possible to see a review of Powers original pot still or the Famous Grouse?
You failed you mention the fact that it has added colourant (E150).
I really like Lagavulin 16 very much. But I consider it a luxury experience, and therefore do not drink it often. A more affordable Islay single malt that is readily available where I live is Bowmore. But the best value for money in my opinion is Blended scotches. They are so many out there with flavour profiles to suit the majority of tastes.
reptilianskin I love the Bowmore 12 (my intro to scotch) planning to get the Lagavulin in a few month, should jump straight to it or acclimate with another intermediate whiskey?
i would recommend trying highland park after bowmore, or maybe caol ila 12. lagavulin isnt much more peaty than caol ila 12 imo. but they are a good bit more peaty than bowmore 12, which was my 1st peated scotch
I understand what you mean. My cousin had a bottle of Glenlivet 12 from the early 90's in his cabinet. It was much more complex than the bottle I had purchased earlier that month. Scotch is much more in demand these days so quality has been tossed aside. This is not to say that the Scotch is bad; it could be much better and not so hurried.
lapsang suchong tea is smoked during processing, which gives it that "camp fire" taste. love lagavulin 16
Hi Ralfy,
would it be possible for you to include the price paid during your reviews to let viewers include this into their decision process for acquiring a new bottle for trial.
. . . problem is that prices vary so much around the World and in retail locations.
@@thewhiskybothy Thats a valid point, Thanks Ralfy!
Thank you for your excellent channel. I had a bottle of this 10 years ago and absolutely loved it. I had a bottle (200cl) this afternoon and was overwhelmed by a strong whiff of TCP. The whiskey was still characteristically smooth rich in flavour. I have read up on this and it appears that this can be a characteristic of maturation beside the sea. i’d be most interested to hear your point of view. Cheers in anticipation
This stuff is amazing. Takes a real man to sip this
Bring on the campfire!
Interesting. "Not the same, aint what it use to be" comments in this review. Hmm I have not tried the Lag 16 yet, I have been recommended to try the Lag 16 for a while but its a bit on the pricey side. I like my Ardbeg 10, Laph 10 and I really enjoy Highland Park.
My next purchase was going to be either Lagavulin 16, Ardbeg Corryveckran, or HIghland Park 18.. or maybe try a Spring Bank 10 for the first time. What do you say Ralfy?
I enjoyed both of these reviews - thank you as always. One thing I did notice is that for the re-review, your initial remarks were made after adding water, where as in the initial one, you went straight from the bottle. I am hoping that at some point, you or one of the (few) good reviewers, will do a side-by-side on the modern Laga 16 and the one from the 1980s. An expensive proposition, I expect. If you know of one, I'd love the link. This was when I first tasted Laga and to be honest, I just think the new iteration is harsher and less balanced, but it was sooooooooo long ago. Thank you again!
just picked this up at costco for ($58.99). First experience with a single malt with this much smoke/peat. Loved it!! Up until this point I would have told you my favorite scotch blended/single malt would have been green label/Macallan 12yr... I think this replaces both those even though it is completely different. thanks for the reviews ralfy.
Great reviews Ralfy, have you tried Arran Machrie Moor and do you recommend it?
My first glass of this tonight and I love it.... The first Scotch I ever tasted was Laphroig 10 y.o. It took forever to get over that experience, that was too much too soon in my journey of Scotch Whisky. But, seeking knowledge and understanding about all whiskies, I learned about the five regions, basically, five flavor types of Scotch Whisky, of which there are many variables...... So, 2 years ago, I really started experiencing Scotches from all regions,,,, Fast forward,,,, I simply love this Lagavulin 16Y.O. Scotch. I will say sweet, great peat flavor, minty, yes minty to me, and not hard to get along with,,, I do not need to try to convince myself to like it...But, I need to find a Smokier one now, maybe the Lagavulin 12Y.O.????? Any help?????
My first dram was Laphroaig 10 y.o. too, and I know what you mean! I would recommend Ardbeg 10 y.o. or why not Ardbeg Uigeadail if you want to try something different but still very good and about in the same price range as Lagavulin 16. I've just ordered the Lagavulin 8 y.o. and the Distiller's Edition and will get back with feedback.
Vladimir Stanisav
Thanks Vladi,,,, Yes, I have an open bottle of Ardbeg 10... and I like it a lot.. I think the Lag 16 is just a bit better all around,, both are good... I will be getting that Ardbeg Uigeadail this week, and also the Corryvreckran to try also... Thank you for reaching out and yes I would like to hear more about you experiences with these or other ones you really enjoy.
. . . Lagavulin Distillers Edition and Longrow 10yo
Lagavulin taste like burnt rubber from burned out tires on a car with a strong smokey aftermath. I am not a fan
ralfydotcom
Thank you Ralfy,,, I am driving a 450 mile round trip in 10 minutes from now to get to these wonderful expressions, so I will add these two recommendations, thus making the drive that much more worthwhile... Longrow 10, and Lagavulin distillers edition coming right up.... Thank you for this input...
Hello Ralfy. Have you tasted the new 8 year old Lagavulin? Its not exactly cheap for a young whisky but at least its an honest presentation...
Will forever have a soft spot for Lagavulin. One of the legends of the industry and the all time great drams. Ownership may not be what it once was… but the future may change that.
Thanks for the review, could you please give the bottle code? Sadly I feel a need to balance it with a bit of a warning. According my personal experience with a friend's Dec. 2015 Laga (L5244CM000) which might still linger on some shelves, there was at least one sub-par batch around this time. Compared to my 2012 bottling and it was less peaty, less spicy with a noticeably shorter finish. For me definitely a drop in quality, although not the horrible experience some amazon.de buyers had presumably suffered during the christmas season with multiple frustrated reviews (alas, no codes given). Anyhow it makes me consider selling my closed bottle of the same batch and buy something else instead.
+Hogibaer . . . here we are L5349CM00 09169614
My absolute GOTO dram...love it!
The Distillers Edition is indeed superb, my dram bargain of last year was finding a camp site bar in Cumbria selling Lagavulin 16 for £2 a dram, to say I indulged would be an understatement.
I've been experimenting with whisky for the last year and I have a bottle of this stuff (I bought months ago) but have not opened it yet, I'm working my way up to it.
Good lad
I'm keeping mine cold and in their boxes/cans, after pouring a dram I always give it a press of private preserve, and I have to say, it seems to work well, I have an Uigeadail that's about 2/3 empty by now, it's around 8 months and still tastes like the first dram.
+DusteDs Stuff Curious if you are missing out. If it is really like the first dram you probably are. I find most good scotch to be better after the first 1/3 and some much better on the second 1/2 of the bottle. That must be from oxygen allowing it to open some. Any chance you are preventing that benefit? Obviously there is a point where air would harm it, then spray away.
+Brian D one more thought, does it really not affect the liquid? Seems like the wrong water will change the taste, have a tough time thinking that spraying anything in the bottle is better than leaving it alone. Just curious.
Brian D Maybe I am, I am not sure, I drink a dram very slowly, and experience a lot of change during the hour or so :) I did not use it in my laphroiag 10, and I found it when it was down to 3/4s. About the spray, the gasses are noble, gasses such as argon, their very property is that they are inert, do not chemically react with anything, and are heavier than air, putting a blanket of non-reactive gas on top of the liquid. Now, air expands and contracts with temperature and since the cork is not 100% airtight, this effectively exchanges the gas in the bottle over time, but the heavier intert gasses will lay in the bottom still.
Hi Ralfy.. love the blogs Sir ,very informative . Have you heard anything about a shortage in stock globally on this whisky? I live in Prague Czech Republic and recently noticed one or two retailers here have hiked up their price on the standard bottling of the 16 y o. Global wines 3999czk = £137.. !!! They are either crazy or something is going on. Plenty of other Retailers here have it for what I would call a more realistic price. 2190czk = £75 .. surely the manufacturer ought to have some control over R.R P. ? What are your thoughts?
. . . there is no shortage of whisky, only a shortage of quality whisky.
Its Diageo New Pricing Policy. They want their Classic Malts became luxury Whisky. Thats why Laga16 price went up from aprox £69 to £80+ in UK, Oban14 ftom aprox £49 to £70+ and Talisker18 from aprox £80 to...£175. Welcome to Diageo New World. Enjoy. 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
Hi Ralfy, I only recently discovered your channel and enjoy your video's very much! I would like to know if you have ever reviewed the Glen Turret Distillery. I loved their 15 year old Malt during my visits there in 1984 and again in 1987 but cannot find it anywhere here in the USA.
+TwoFootCal301 I saw some at a TotalWine by an independant distiller... cant remember the name though. Next time I go I'll try to find it again and update this post.
Thanks very much Erik!
Just bought my first Lagavulin/peated whiskey, I haven't taste it yet. I kept hearing great things for the 16.
So what’s the green sweet celery thing that’s used for cakes…????
Hey there Ralfy, thank you for touching on a first favorite peated whisky of mine. I noticed you scored Lagavulin 16yo lower than you did last time a few years ago when you gave it a 90. Is that because it's not made quite so well as it was back then, have your tastes changed over the years, is your opinion affected by the storage ("dunnage"did you call it) method, or perhaps something else? I have to add that as my taste developed over the years I'm finding my opinion of L16 though still quite high is not as high as it once was. Just interested in how you see it differs now.
+Disernia . . . I think the calibre of casks are not quite what they used to be.
+ralfystuff ...which was confirmed by warehouse manager Ian McArthur during my tour in 2014, who stated that casks were nowadays (in contrast to older days) re-filled multiple times. And he apparently took no pride in sharing this truth.
+Hogibaer That's a shame, especially considering we are still paying a premium price for it. It sells for $80 a bottle before tax here in NY.
One Ralfy did not mention, is how good the price-to-quality ratio is on this one. Every time I see something similar (peated, sherry whisky) it tends to cost more, yet the quality is comparable at best. It's probably coming down do the mass-production that makes it cheaper, but hell - I don't really mind.
On this one, I also really love how it changes when you leave it in a glass and smell it. Starts with heavy peat, then opens up and brings the sherry notes. After a while you hardly notice the smoke smell, and it actually acts as a carriage for the other notes (dried fruit, sherry, vanilla from oak).
Very comparable whisky would be BenRiach Heredotus Fumosus, although slightly sharper and peppery on the tongue. Probably because it's been matured shorter, in bigger casks. A good whisky nevertheless.
I disagree with adding water personally. It opens up a more bitter characteristic to me that i dont find pleasing. Great review.
I agree. Adding water ruins it for me.
Definitely no water!!
Drank a bottle of Glenfiddich and loved it, where do I go from here?
Mackenzie Benedict to islay we go
Ethan Galloway A "vacation" to Islay sounds wonderful
Mackenzie Benedict jumping to Islay from Glenfiddich might not be the best move. Try a dram of one of the classic Islays (Lagavulin, Ardbeg, Laphroag) at bar and see if you like it first. Peat smoke is an acquired taste! Best to start with a lighter expression to get your feet wet. Id recommend Highland Park or Bunnahabhain. Great stepping stones into the world of smokey scotch. Cheers!
Highland Park 12
Ardbeg 10
Thanks Ralfy. Three comments:
1) I am not really a fan of Lagavulin 16 yo. Too heavy, lacks some elegance and finesse. Just my opinion.
2) I suggest you explore the issue of cork in the future. It would be interesting to hear more from you. Cork vs plastic has been a serious issue in the wine industry. Where comes cork from, when used in whisky bottles? Cork is a major question here in Portugal. It might look a non-issue for Scottish people and for the whisky industry, but I am not certain. Please question some producers about it and tell us something.
3) Canned haggis on the shelf behind you? Is it good? haha :D
I love Laphroaig 10. I love peat. What should I try next? Thank you !
Laphroaig 10 CS, Port Charlotte islay Barley (more earthy vegetal peat, than fire smoke), Ledaig 10, Ardberg Uigedal or Correywrecken, Kilchoman Sanaig.... :)
@@DayKlight man that's one solid list. Lovely recommendation
Ardbeg 10
Rittenouse rye whiskey if you’re on a budget
I know Ron Swanson will be tuning in for this whisky review. We all know what he thinks of this stuff! XD
dont know if i was lucky but my batch was amazing much like that of yesteryear batch began with l6155 but was similar too johnnie walker black but more notes to it even leathery tastes seemed unreal i suspect newer casks were involved but this was somthing different to the newer stuff i have tasted recently
Ralfy, I like a smokey whisky like what Johnny Walker Gold used to be. What would you recommend?
+Jay Lentsch Highland Park
+Jay Lentsch Highland Park 15 has the smoke
Ah, Lagavulin. I remember trying the 16 yo a couple of years ago and I liked it a lot. I think I'll get another bottle after finishing my current woodsmoked whisky. It's nice but it's not the same.