Nothing has had as enormous of an impact on cities as Cars. Urban Design in Indian cities has changed significantly. This video is a reupload from our Keep On Driving channel. 🗺 View Digital Transit Maps: narangstudios.com/products/combo-mumbai-bangalore-maps 📷 Follow on Instagram: instagram.com/lastly.yt
Finally someone is bringing these concepts in an Indian context. We need to educate our people that shiny high rises and fancy glass offices and lots of caste is not the packs of development. We need more education about urban density and urban transit. ❤❤
Great to see this video! High time we talk about urbanism in the Indian context. All the complaints about the temperature, dust and pollution are dumb because cars are the exact reason why these problems exist. Plant trees, make grass tracks and remove cars from the cities with congestion pricing, watch the air quality improve and the temperatures decrease by at least 7-10 degrees. Many other cities in Asia have successfully established excellent public transit systems in similar conditions to ours. Japan, Singapore, China are just some examples of these. India needs to invest A TON more into public transit and start with measures like removing unorganised parking (which are huge problems for both pedestrians and other vehicles) and congestion pricing. Funnel these avenues of incomes into developing public transit like footpaths, cycle lanes, low floor buses and metros. This is the only way we can combat the high density of out country (which is a beautiful thing, being able to walk or cycle to a nearby store in 5 minutes is one of the best freedoms ever!). Great stuff, please keep it up!
cars are a problem inside the city and metro is a great solution for work based travel also the mixed Development is a really great method and is actually still very commonly. In my city Kolkata, this city has done a lot of things wrong but It still has got basic public transport right though upgradation is highly needed. Even the Auto Rickshaws dont operate like Cabs but more like buses with a specified routes and fixed fares making great for last mile connectivity. Only if we has a reasonable political will Kolkata would have become a complete Transit Oriented City. People here are disciplined and use public transport extensively. ->How the Metro development is going on in the city in a few decades it would be a great mode of transportation across the city ->Everyone talks about Mumbai local but Kolkata Suburban Network is also quite dense and very extensively used. -> Though a huge step backward in transit oriented City Planning is infact the New Town are its heavily Car-Centric Developed region. Even Salt Lake Region where my college is situated is comparatively walkable tho its still a Car Centric Place that is.
11:05 You cannot use transportation modes like bicycles to travel in Delhi as the temperatures are polarising in different weather conditions. In winters it drops down to freezing cold and riding a bicycle in 50 degrees is impossible
Yeah, it just sounds good on paper, its not practical here. Further, i refuse to cycle outside when all I can inhale is dust and exhaust. It just sucks. You arrive anywhere really sweaty, and if bathrooms were provided everywhere then water wastage would be an environmental issue.
Recently came back from tokyo. It also faces problem like extreme temperature (37 deg cel in summers, that is problematic with so much humidity + worse winters than delhi). The cycling experience is too good. People respect spaces for pedestrian, cycles and cars. No one is in anger to reach somewhere. No agression at all. There are shops literally everywhere, the need for a car is almost 0. Surprisingly, there is no cycling infrastructure. Just painted bike lanes, but the civic sense of people around makes the cycling experience very safe and enjoyable. You won't feel the scorching heat because of the narrow building's shade, trees around. I think its 70% is people problem, like civic sense, and cars won't respect you at all if you are cycling, 30% is infra and environmental issue. If govt builds a protected cycling infrastructure end to end, I am sure we will see a lot of people cycling. Moreover, in bengaluru has a perfect chance to build best cycling city in india (because of weather, almost perfect) which can compete with international cities. But there also you will not find any person cycling, because lack of civic sense, no protected cycling infra at all, footpaths are almost a joke with so many bikes parked on footpath, you cannot even walk on it properly. All in all I don't think its a weather problem.
@@thanos8638 trees dont convert 45 degrees to 20 degrees dude, trees dont make the hot dry air into a cool breeze. Trees just provide temporary relief.
@darktitan8085 they do. They drastically decrease the temperature of an area. Improves the ecosystem. The long shades of trees improve the local economy. Car brain won't understand.
Please make dedicate video of rrts routes delhi meerut, delhi alwar, delhi panipat, ghaziabad jewar airport or gurugram faridabad jewar airport sabhi routes par
Interesting different video. Nevertheless, I'd like to understand why, Delhi's apart, Metro systems in India are so empty and ridership totally disappointing (Jaipur, Nagpur, Agra, Kanpur, Kochi and even in Bangalore and its 14 million inhabitants...). Moreover there is generally absolutely no integration between buses and metro to make a unique comprehensive system by metro area. Sometimes even no physical integration between lines (ie Delhi Blue and Aqua line in Noida !). The planning process should be totally reviewed and should be inspired by metro building in China and integration (network and fares) in Europa. Is it because of incompetence (State and Local authorities), corruption, planning teams, political clientelism for the choice of lines. Please explain in details why it's so desesperate !
I'm from Noida. The proposed extension of the Aqua line to Knowledge Park-V should also include the construction of a proper interchange with the Blue line at Sector 61. Also here's a covered walkway being built (almost complete last I saw it) from Sector 52 Blue Line to Sector 51 Aqua Line station. Not sure why it's needed if there is going to be a proper interchange in the future but well, the Aqua line extension looks like it's gonna take around 5 years so it will help in the meanwhile, I guess. Coming to your question, I think it's unfair to give a knee jerk reaction to look this closely at early ridership numbers, especially when judging small partially opened phases of networks. It's important to remember that the European subways are nearly a century old by this point, they've had a huge time to grow networks and directly shape the cities they serve. China presents a more fair comparison, starting their metro construction spree roughly around the same time as us, though at much more rapid pace. But then one must also remember, China faced many of the same criticisms, from low ridership to seemingly bad route planning. We all remember the viral photos of subway stations opening to empty fields. It takes time for transit's benefits to seep through and become obvious. Sometimes, metro networks, especially in developing, urbanizing nations, aren't just built to serve today's needs but also future growth (as is the case with the Aqua line). They help shape a city's growth pattern. Today, China has the best metro networks on the planet, in my opinion, surpassing Europe. Jaipur metro is the one true failure of the metros you listed, built even though it was unviable and an especially bad route, all so they could use it as campaigning material before an election. Agra and Kanpur have the newest metros in India, and it's too early to say anything, especially as they are still partially under construction of their first phases. Nagpur and Kochi metros are actually doing well enough, and Kochi is very innovative, with decent ridership figures. And Bangalore, is doing great, already crowded at rush hours from the news reports we see, and likely to become a top 20 metro system in the world, considering the multipartisan political will for its construction. I'm younger than the Delhi Metro, and in my own life, I've seen it go from an interesting joyride to an extremely viable alternative and the true backbone of Delhi's transportation with its expansion. So, as networks grow, we'll see the ridership figures grow exponentially. Not to say, of course, there are no problems. This little comment is not in complete defense of our planning teams, who've made some truly baffling decisions with route planning (Pink line's alignment in East Delhi). Or of politicians, whose interference has delayed projects by years (Mumbai Line-3's Aarey Carshed fiasco). India also faces many of the same problems NA and Europe do btw, like NIMBYism and stupid activism, problems which are simply not present in China. Considering all this, I think India's done quite well to grow the Metro networks it has over the past 20, and especially the past 10 years. At a cost that is orders of magnitude lower than what it costs to build similar systems in Europe. And with India's rapidly urbanizing population, all these systems will eventually become viable, sooner or later, just like in China.
@@shlok.shrivastav Thx for your argumented answer. Nevertheless, even though it's really tough to find ridership data of Indian Metros on internet, the last figures I found out were really disappointing : Bangalore 174,2 M in 2020 (477 000/day), Chennai 9,3 M in 2020 (92 000!), Kochi in 2022 31,2 M (85 000), Hyderabad 30 M in 2018 (82 000), Pune 9,3 M in 2023 (25 000 !), Jaipur 6,2M in 2018 (17 000!) and the worst Ahmedabad 0,2 M in 2022 ! I didn't manage to find actual and accurate annual data for Agra, Kanpur, Lucknow, Nagpur or even for the new L3 in Mumbai, absolutely void considering the photos published during its opening day. Maybe you've got better and more recent annual data ? Last question, why opposit to Europe, is there mostly no integration (physical, network and fares) with local buses ?
City of joy Kolkata is no more city of job opportunities an economic prosperity.... Kolkata is a dead City By 2035 I will guaranteed that Bangalore Hyderabad will overtake Kolkata in terms of economy Because these two cities are fastest growing in India in overall world.. Through there heavy industrialisation, fastest growing service sector and fastest urbanising cities. All credit goes to Moumita didi. 🤡🍼
Why do Bhakts want to kill an urban area so badly just because we won't vote for you? This is the reason why this state will never vote for your party.
I'm sorry dude, this video just seems like it was copy pasted from not just bikes channel. Most of our cities have mixed use, you can find most things in 10 mins, this hasn't changed with cars. That channel spreads propoganda, acting like just because europe developed one way, everyone should follow them. Yes, Netherlands is a great place, but India is not netherlands, and trusting Indian politicians with development of infrastructure is not going to work. People buy cars for a reason. Cars are inefficient in city, but ultimately time matters, and they usually accelerate harder and faster out of traffic than motorcycles unless the road is tight. If all the population suddenly used a motorcycle, it wouldnt be any better really, roads might not be very clogged as opposed to cars only, but the confusion would be massive, since 2 wheeler guys just do anything they want without consideration for others. There's also data that usa actually became greener recently, as opposed to europe, which became worse. What does that show?
No cars are a problem inside the city and metro is a great solution for work based travel also the mixed Development is a really great method and is actually still very commonly. In my city Kolkata, this city has done a lot of things wrong but It still has got basic public transport right though upgradation is highly needed. Even the Auto Rickshaws dont operate like Cabs but more like buses with a specified routes and fixed fares making great for last mile connectivity.
@arghyadutta9516 yes but metro gets overcrowded. Idk what kolkata is like but cars aren't a problem. If they are a problem, that means public Infrastructure is very good, which it's not. In my city the roads are a problem hence the bad traffic. I know, "one more lane" will not solve the problem, but "one more lane" is a strategy used by people who have space to expand, unlike here. We do need more lanes here, and unfortunately we ain't getting them.
Nothing has had as enormous of an impact on cities as Cars. Urban Design in Indian cities has changed significantly.
This video is a reupload from our Keep On Driving channel.
🗺 View Digital Transit Maps: narangstudios.com/products/combo-mumbai-bangalore-maps
📷 Follow on Instagram: instagram.com/lastly.yt
Finally someone is bringing these concepts in an Indian context. We need to educate our people that shiny high rises and fancy glass offices and lots of caste is not the packs of development. We need more education about urban density and urban transit. ❤❤
Make videos on each every metro system of india past to future
I will literally cry with tears of hapiness. 😭 the day our cities become walkable.
Congratulations Bro Very nice video thoroughly researched and presenged. It is nice to have Indians who take interest in Urban planning.
Wow!! Never thought about this aspect of urban development bhai, great work, keep it up 🤝💟
8:45 😂Aakash🤣🤣🤣
Great to see this video! High time we talk about urbanism in the Indian context. All the complaints about the temperature, dust and pollution are dumb because cars are the exact reason why these problems exist.
Plant trees, make grass tracks and remove cars from the cities with congestion pricing, watch the air quality improve and the temperatures decrease by at least 7-10 degrees.
Many other cities in Asia have successfully established excellent public transit systems in similar conditions to ours. Japan, Singapore, China are just some examples of these.
India needs to invest A TON more into public transit and start with measures like removing unorganised parking (which are huge problems for both pedestrians and other vehicles) and congestion pricing. Funnel these avenues of incomes into developing public transit like footpaths, cycle lanes, low floor buses and metros.
This is the only way we can combat the high density of out country (which is a beautiful thing, being able to walk or cycle to a nearby store in 5 minutes is one of the best freedoms ever!).
Great stuff, please keep it up!
cars are a problem inside the city and metro is a great solution for work based travel also the mixed Development is a really great method and is actually still very commonly. In my city Kolkata, this city has done a lot of things wrong but It still has got basic public transport right though upgradation is highly needed. Even the Auto Rickshaws dont operate like Cabs but more like buses with a specified routes and fixed fares making great for last mile connectivity.
Only if we has a reasonable political will Kolkata would have become a complete Transit Oriented City. People here are disciplined and use public transport extensively.
->How the Metro development is going on in the city in a few decades it would be a great mode of transportation across the city
->Everyone talks about Mumbai local but Kolkata Suburban Network is also quite dense and very extensively used.
-> Though a huge step backward in transit oriented City Planning is infact the New Town are its heavily Car-Centric Developed region. Even Salt Lake Region where my college is situated is comparatively walkable tho its still a Car Centric Place that is.
Make video on delhi air pollution
What an explanation
Sir apne sahi kaha vehicle se change to aya ha Delhi AQI 500+ , North India - Poison gas spread in Environment.
11:05 You cannot use transportation modes like bicycles to travel in Delhi as the temperatures are polarising in different weather conditions.
In winters it drops down to freezing cold and riding a bicycle in 50 degrees is impossible
Yeah, it just sounds good on paper, its not practical here. Further, i refuse to cycle outside when all I can inhale is dust and exhaust. It just sucks. You arrive anywhere really sweaty, and if bathrooms were provided everywhere then water wastage would be an environmental issue.
Trees. Trees exist.
Recently came back from tokyo. It also faces problem like extreme temperature (37 deg cel in summers, that is problematic with so much humidity + worse winters than delhi). The cycling experience is too good.
People respect spaces for pedestrian, cycles and cars. No one is in anger to reach somewhere. No agression at all. There are shops literally everywhere, the need for a car is almost 0. Surprisingly, there is no cycling infrastructure. Just painted bike lanes, but the civic sense of people around makes the cycling experience very safe and enjoyable. You won't feel the scorching heat because of the narrow building's shade, trees around.
I think its 70% is people problem, like civic sense, and cars won't respect you at all if you are cycling, 30% is infra and environmental issue. If govt builds a protected cycling infrastructure end to end, I am sure we will see a lot of people cycling.
Moreover, in bengaluru has a perfect chance to build best cycling city in india (because of weather, almost perfect) which can compete with international cities. But there also you will not find any person cycling, because lack of civic sense, no protected cycling infra at all, footpaths are almost a joke with so many bikes parked on footpath, you cannot even walk on it properly.
All in all I don't think its a weather problem.
@@thanos8638 trees dont convert 45 degrees to 20 degrees dude, trees dont make the hot dry air into a cool breeze. Trees just provide temporary relief.
@darktitan8085 they do. They drastically decrease the temperature of an area. Improves the ecosystem. The long shades of trees improve the local economy. Car brain won't understand.
Can you make a video on all recently developed areas across India and with what planning they are developed
8:35 are re bhai mere ghar me ghus gaye 💀💀😂😂
Nice video we want this type of sustainable video, by this people will realise how to build good citys ❤🙏
@@bewatch_0 maybe, but since when did people start building the city?
Suggestion for Next video: Income Inequality in planning of Cities Example- Sainik Farms v Sangam Nagar. 😢😢😢
Please make dedicate video of rrts routes delhi meerut, delhi alwar, delhi panipat, ghaziabad jewar airport or gurugram faridabad jewar airport sabhi routes par
Hi brother are you from hyderabad because I saw some clips of hyderabad???
Interesting different video. Nevertheless, I'd like to understand why, Delhi's apart, Metro systems in India are so empty and ridership totally disappointing (Jaipur, Nagpur, Agra, Kanpur, Kochi and even in Bangalore and its 14 million inhabitants...). Moreover there is generally absolutely no integration between buses and metro to make a unique comprehensive system by metro area. Sometimes even no physical integration between lines (ie Delhi Blue and Aqua line in Noida !). The planning process should be totally reviewed and should be inspired by metro building in China and integration (network and fares) in Europa. Is it because of incompetence (State and Local authorities), corruption, planning teams, political clientelism for the choice of lines. Please explain in details why it's so desesperate !
I'm from Noida. The proposed extension of the Aqua line to Knowledge Park-V should also include the construction of a proper interchange with the Blue line at Sector 61. Also here's a covered walkway being built (almost complete last I saw it) from Sector 52 Blue Line to Sector 51 Aqua Line station. Not sure why it's needed if there is going to be a proper interchange in the future but well, the Aqua line extension looks like it's gonna take around 5 years so it will help in the meanwhile, I guess.
Coming to your question, I think it's unfair to give a knee jerk reaction to look this closely at early ridership numbers, especially when judging small partially opened phases of networks. It's important to remember that the European subways are nearly a century old by this point, they've had a huge time to grow networks and directly shape the cities they serve.
China presents a more fair comparison, starting their metro construction spree roughly around the same time as us, though at much more rapid pace. But then one must also remember, China faced many of the same criticisms, from low ridership to seemingly bad route planning. We all remember the viral photos of subway stations opening to empty fields. It takes time for transit's benefits to seep through and become obvious. Sometimes, metro networks, especially in developing, urbanizing nations, aren't just built to serve today's needs but also future growth (as is the case with the Aqua line). They help shape a city's growth pattern. Today, China has the best metro networks on the planet, in my opinion, surpassing Europe.
Jaipur metro is the one true failure of the metros you listed, built even though it was unviable and an especially bad route, all so they could use it as campaigning material before an election. Agra and Kanpur have the newest metros in India, and it's too early to say anything, especially as they are still partially under construction of their first phases. Nagpur and Kochi metros are actually doing well enough, and Kochi is very innovative, with decent ridership figures. And Bangalore, is doing great, already crowded at rush hours from the news reports we see, and likely to become a top 20 metro system in the world, considering the multipartisan political will for its construction.
I'm younger than the Delhi Metro, and in my own life, I've seen it go from an interesting joyride to an extremely viable alternative and the true backbone of Delhi's transportation with its expansion. So, as networks grow, we'll see the ridership figures grow exponentially.
Not to say, of course, there are no problems. This little comment is not in complete defense of our planning teams, who've made some truly baffling decisions with route planning (Pink line's alignment in East Delhi). Or of politicians, whose interference has delayed projects by years (Mumbai Line-3's Aarey Carshed fiasco).
India also faces many of the same problems NA and Europe do btw, like NIMBYism and stupid activism, problems which are simply not present in China.
Considering all this, I think India's done quite well to grow the Metro networks it has over the past 20, and especially the past 10 years. At a cost that is orders of magnitude lower than what it costs to build similar systems in Europe. And with India's rapidly urbanizing population, all these systems will eventually become viable, sooner or later, just like in China.
@@shlok.shrivastav Thx for your argumented answer. Nevertheless, even though it's really tough to find ridership data of Indian Metros on internet, the last figures I found out were really disappointing : Bangalore 174,2 M in 2020 (477 000/day), Chennai 9,3 M in 2020 (92 000!), Kochi in 2022 31,2 M (85 000), Hyderabad 30 M in 2018 (82 000), Pune 9,3 M in 2023 (25 000 !), Jaipur 6,2M in 2018 (17 000!) and the worst Ahmedabad 0,2 M in 2022 !
I didn't manage to find actual and accurate annual data for Agra, Kanpur, Lucknow, Nagpur or even for the new L3 in Mumbai, absolutely void considering the photos published during its opening day.
Maybe you've got better and more recent annual data ?
Last question, why opposit to Europe, is there mostly no integration (physical, network and fares) with local buses ?
@@francoisperrot4890These metro rideship figures are fake
Aap mere bhot se dauot dur karte hai ❤❤❤dhanyawad
It is re-uploaded
Video source -keep on driving
Thank me later.
Keep on Driving is also his channel
🤩
City of joy Kolkata is no more city of job opportunities an economic prosperity....
Kolkata is a dead City
By 2035 I will guaranteed that
Bangalore Hyderabad will overtake Kolkata in terms of economy
Because these two cities are fastest growing in India in overall world..
Through there heavy industrialisation, fastest growing service sector and fastest urbanising cities.
All credit goes to Moumita didi.
🤡🍼
Why do Bhakts want to kill an urban area so badly just because we won't vote for you? This is the reason why this state will never vote for your party.
@@navnathsurvase3490 why do even take taxes from us if you believe the state isn't producing anything? Return our taxes then.
I'm sorry dude, this video just seems like it was copy pasted from not just bikes channel.
Most of our cities have mixed use, you can find most things in 10 mins, this hasn't changed with cars.
That channel spreads propoganda, acting like just because europe developed one way, everyone should follow them. Yes, Netherlands is a great place, but India is not netherlands, and trusting Indian politicians with development of infrastructure is not going to work.
People buy cars for a reason. Cars are inefficient in city, but ultimately time matters, and they usually accelerate harder and faster out of traffic than motorcycles unless the road is tight. If all the population suddenly used a motorcycle, it wouldnt be any better really, roads might not be very clogged as opposed to cars only, but the confusion would be massive, since 2 wheeler guys just do anything they want without consideration for others.
There's also data that usa actually became greener recently, as opposed to europe, which became worse. What does that show?
Agreed, this video was stolen by the channel “Keep on driving”
No cars are a problem inside the city and metro is a great solution for work based travel also the mixed Development is a really great method and is actually still very commonly. In my city Kolkata, this city has done a lot of things wrong but It still has got basic public transport right though upgradation is highly needed. Even the Auto Rickshaws dont operate like Cabs but more like buses with a specified routes and fixed fares making great for last mile connectivity.
@arghyadutta9516 yes but metro gets overcrowded. Idk what kolkata is like but cars aren't a problem. If they are a problem, that means public Infrastructure is very good, which it's not.
In my city the roads are a problem hence the bad traffic. I know, "one more lane" will not solve the problem, but "one more lane" is a strategy used by people who have space to expand, unlike here. We do need more lanes here, and unfortunately we ain't getting them.