Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: Part 4 - Assessing Certainty of Evidence: The GRADE Approach

Part 4 in a four-part video series presented by Laura Chiavaroli, MSc, PhD (Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto).
This video reviews the GRADE Approach, which can be used to interpret the results and certainty of evidence of a SRMA. This is important as the strength of a SRMA is dependent on the quality of the studies from which the data is obtained.

[@geofreyoteng]

Awesome, thanks for sharing

[@azizygladyola2955]

this was very helpful, thank you

[@onelove4all]

All these explanation is complicated 😊
Am looking for a proper demo -video on data entry into Risk of Bias software ( ROB 2.0).
😊😊😊

[@nishantp9639]

What if we use eggar's test and beg's test is it valid for risk of bias

[@aishwaryanagarajan8721]

Can I please know the difference between index test and reference standards?

[@pimspekreyse4584]

what to do with imprecision when there are no confidence intervals reported in the study?

[@abdullahmunir1994]

Uncertain, leave them as it is. Not sure about it according to GRADE guidlines

[@XerxesBreakSama]

I wanna know how to create the risk of bias plot such as portrayed in 6:15

[@kevinjenniskens3798]

Google robvis

[@guillermocano_verdugo]

Does GRADE replace ROBINS?

[@twoton1991]

Can GRADE be used instead of the hierarchy of evidence to prioritise studies of quality rather than studys that fulfill a specific type (e.g RCT’s)