"FIREBIRDS" UPDATE PREVIEW | War Thunder Official Channel

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,1 тис.

  • @joshhannam943
    @joshhannam943 Місяць тому +386

    F117 before a LAV25 or the ASLAV is absolutely bananas.
    I’ve been waiting years for the simplest of vehicles

    • @germiksss
      @germiksss Місяць тому +19

      we all wait for LAV25 to do a reference of BF2

    • @Alphacuremom55
      @Alphacuremom55 Місяць тому +7

      I agree, show some love for the USMC !

    • @teethirtyfour7394
      @teethirtyfour7394 Місяць тому +6

      2D LAR Bn. here. Can’t believe the LAV25 still isn’t in the game.

    • @ODST_Parker
      @ODST_Parker Місяць тому +4

      Bro, I'm here waiting for production model Centauros, the Centauro II, the Leopard 1A2, and the real OTO M47. Then the Toldis and Nimrod for Hungary, not to mention their entire WWII air tree. And that's just Italy. Gaijin refuses to add the simplest things, even when they've been on leak lists and/or datamines, or have been in the game in other forms for years.

    • @СтаниславСорокин-ъ3б
      @СтаниславСорокин-ъ3б Місяць тому +1

      or LAV with M901 turret, imagine how goot it can be with 100 km/h, insane ambush vehicle

  • @1monkeyfeet3
    @1monkeyfeet3 Місяць тому +362

    "We can't add the brimstone because it allows the attacker to operate outside the range of SPAA"
    Add's Russian weapons that allows the attacker to stay outside of SPAA range
    Not a British main but they aren't even hiding Russian Bias anymore

    • @विनितकुमार-य5ढ
      @विनितकुमार-य5ढ Місяць тому +7

      F 15e guided bomb?

    • @Apex_warthunder
      @Apex_warthunder Місяць тому

      @@विनितकुमार-य5ढ what?

    • @kv2_tank
      @kv2_tank Місяць тому +7

      T​he SU 25 and 39 KH missiles can hit from about 15km

    • @chrisreynolds6143
      @chrisreynolds6143 Місяць тому +5

      ARH vs GPS glide bomb...idk man seems pretty straightforward why there's a difference

    • @EnderGhost119
      @EnderGhost119 Місяць тому +6

      @@kv2_tank Most GRB maps aren't even big enough to facilitate weapons with 15+ km ranges so its a pointless thing to be angry about to begin with.

  • @darealsherlock8026
    @darealsherlock8026 Місяць тому +338

    Before it goes live, could I suggest making the "stealth" aspect of the F117 more appealing by making the name marker disappear in Air RB and Arcade?
    Increasing the IR debuff at the same time (limiting locks to something like 1km) would also make the 8.7 rating more reasonable.

    • @zachattack_the_imperialist6065
      @zachattack_the_imperialist6065 Місяць тому +32

      Actually this is a really good idea

    • @B.ones13
      @B.ones13 Місяць тому +18

      Good changes but it would have to be at least 2-2,5km limit

    • @darealsherlock8026
      @darealsherlock8026 Місяць тому +7

      @@B.ones13 Yeah, I just wanted to highlight that the IR debuff doesn't seem strong enough based on the vid. The actual number is kinda up in the air

    • @SCPFoundationist
      @SCPFoundationist Місяць тому +5

      I have an idea, make it just like the average jet and give it only 2 100lb bombs, then put it in 1.7

    • @blooddrunk4957
      @blooddrunk4957 Місяць тому

      Beat me to it

  • @bagofsunshine3916
    @bagofsunshine3916 Місяць тому +232

    As a Dutchman, it pains me greatly that the Dutch vehicles are added to the French tech tree.

    • @Alphacuremom55
      @Alphacuremom55 Місяць тому +12

      Would you rather they be in Germany lol

    • @bagofsunshine3916
      @bagofsunshine3916 Місяць тому +71

      @@Alphacuremom55 yes, yes i would rather. Hell, i'd be more happy if they were with the British.

    • @nachodepetris18
      @nachodepetris18 Місяць тому

      Lmao what a loser

    • @technopriest6708
      @technopriest6708 Місяць тому +7

      Lmao, The Netherlands is a french territory confirmed

    • @DutchHistoryGuy
      @DutchHistoryGuy Місяць тому +5

      ​@@Alphacuremom55I would rather be in the Italian tree then in the French tree

  • @ieqit4482
    @ieqit4482 Місяць тому +284

    No new top tier AAs but 40 km+ weapons sound a bit crazy to me. Russia is still the only nation that can reliably shoot down ATGMs, bombs etc with the Pantsir while the Pantsir also has the longest range missiles. That doesn't sound very fair to me

    • @irirjhrhr4645
      @irirjhrhr4645 Місяць тому +30

      yeah, not fair at all, they should add Pantsir SM/SM-SV to make it fair. it has 40km range

    • @JimmySaulGoodmanMcGill1960
      @JimmySaulGoodmanMcGill1960 Місяць тому +6

      france and sweden can also do that with the ITO, but yeah it's kinda tarded

    • @Velolyn
      @Velolyn Місяць тому +2

      The Pantsir still can't shoot down a wide-volley of 8+ ATGMs, and it still has way fewer missiles than what 1 plane gets in 1 load, let alone the fact that aircraft get to easily reload, while SPAA can't. I think the F-117 also deserves mention, a downtier means the worst thing it can face is a MISTRAL.

    • @Collat3ralD4mage
      @Collat3ralD4mage Місяць тому +10

      @@JimmySaulGoodmanMcGill1960but that has half the range of the pantsir and no guns

    • @ieqit4482
      @ieqit4482 Місяць тому +17

      @Velolyn what are you yapping about. Are you telling me the Pantsir isn't as good as it seems? A Pantsir paying some attention to its radar can easily shoot down all 6 Mavericks of an F16 before they even get close to gun range, which can also destroy bombs etc. compare that to the flarakrad. The Pantsirs radar is better in every point just for an example 18° vs 80° vertically, then the missile alone 12 ready to fire missiles vs 2 ready to fire with 10 in total, missiles range, gun vs no gun etc.... u can't tell me that's somewhat fair

  • @cursed_cat28
    @cursed_cat28 Місяць тому +470

    Where's Patriot? Or is it just standing around?

    • @lurtzy_
      @lurtzy_ Місяць тому +105

      why would they add a whole SAM system into war thunder???

    • @Freezefort
      @Freezefort Місяць тому +83

      50:22

    • @jaiiii116
      @jaiiii116 Місяць тому +30

      ​@@lurtzy_it's going to have to happen eventually, it would be quite easy to implement.

    • @crashmaster3000
      @crashmaster3000 Місяць тому +30

      ​@@lurtzy_they very clearly showed it in the trailer

    • @NightRye_
      @NightRye_ Місяць тому +26

      Its going to replace the Rolands in airfields

  • @wardocampbell
    @wardocampbell Місяць тому +199

    Leopards in the french tech tree ? The devs really are lazy...
    Instead of giving them Gepards, VBLs, prototypes of Leclercs and new versions of AMX-10RC... like bruh...

    • @wArTOonder
      @wArTOonder Місяць тому

      I’m happy I can spam even more op vehicles yaaaaay

    • @aerithgainsbourg6405
      @aerithgainsbourg6405 Місяць тому

      As a french main I have the same reaction, France has amazing prototypes and variant from tank, plane et helicopter sad they are not in the game…

    • @athiftsabit1208
      @athiftsabit1208 Місяць тому

      This. Pathetic dev.

    • @bagelmaster2498
      @bagelmaster2498 Місяць тому +34

      Genuinely a pretty shitty update actually. Germany doesn’t even get a plane lmao

    • @schnitzel_enjoyer
      @schnitzel_enjoyer Місяць тому +12

      no point grinding germany beyong 7.7 at this point

  • @ghostsniperdk9989
    @ghostsniperdk9989 Місяць тому +277

    I wish you guys could make so you can test drive/fly/sail any of the unlockable Planes and that stuff so you can try out what you are aiming for... to research and grind for... since i really want to go for the F16AJ but have to research everything to test fly it

    • @snikrepak
      @snikrepak Місяць тому +1

      It's a good plane, i got all the Japanese air

    • @shayzadg
      @shayzadg Місяць тому +28

      It gives excitement to grind for the vehicle. Like a reward. If you can test any thing then motivation could be lost to get it…I think that’s why they don’t allow it

    • @unselling1822
      @unselling1822 Місяць тому +21

      Trust me everybody agrees with you but the snail will never do it, the people have to buy premium plans and time to get what they want faster

    • @AH-64E_apache
      @AH-64E_apache Місяць тому +4

      At least they updated the Test drive targets

    • @55swordninja
      @55swordninja Місяць тому +1

      You can test any vehicles by going to wiki and going to the vehicle you want and hit show in game. I do it on my ps4 all the time!

  • @nartjies11
    @nartjies11 Місяць тому +74

    So “for gameplay purposes” we’ll still have weapons that can strike you from 35km+ where the only anti air at the BR that can counter them is in the same nation. But we’ll disable a weapon system’s actual capabilities. Makes a lot of sense🤨

    • @SecuR0M
      @SecuR0M Місяць тому

      ...How is Pantsir "the only anti air" when every major nation has missile anti air at that BR that can engage missiles? Lol. The only one missing is Tracked Rapier but UK also has ADATS.

    • @masonry1452
      @masonry1452 Місяць тому +4

      @@SecuR0M LOL there are only Pantsir and other AAs, they are not even in the same level

    • @SecuR0M
      @SecuR0M Місяць тому

      @@masonry1452 if you get killed by Su39s giant missiles you lack skill
      Any proximity fused SAM can engage bombs and missiles now but it's easiest with SACLOS ADATS and Roland which all majors besides the USSR have a variant of.

    • @dzemrdsongramovec4288
      @dzemrdsongramovec4288 Місяць тому

      @@SecuR0M NOPE, show me 10 times that you can do this in ADATS

    • @SecuR0M
      @SecuR0M Місяць тому

      @@dzemrdsongramovec4288 It's literally in the patch notes just get good.

  • @NoMercyt99
    @NoMercyt99 Місяць тому +39

    French Dutch Leopards are the dumbest thing Gajin did ever

    • @СтаниславСорокин-ъ3б
      @СтаниславСорокин-ъ3б Місяць тому +3

      don't forget Indian T-90 in bri'ish tree

    • @NoMercyt99
      @NoMercyt99 Місяць тому

      @@СтаниславСорокин-ъ3б Well thats dumb as well

    • @hunt3r671
      @hunt3r671 Місяць тому +6

      Leclerc T-4 terminator
      Leclerc T-40
      Leclerc XLR
      Vextra 120 retrofit
      VBCI AZUR
      EBRC Jaguar
      Sagaie
      Uro vamtac milan
      Amx 10 RCR
      Mirage 2000 D-RMV (cas master)
      T'as tellement de choix... Mais les leopards 2... Même pas d'efforts pour créer une branche de 0...

    • @jacobsisson_
      @jacobsisson_ Місяць тому +1

      ​​​Leclerc XLR would be the first 12.3 vehicle, you couldn't add it without adding the Sep v3 and the t14 Armata, there are no fourth generation tanks in the game, and Leclerc t 40 isnt even a function design, unlike the XM 1 for example, Vextra 120 never actually existed, just a mock that turned into the VBCI which is already in the game, I would agree with you but once you actually go through every mainline French design, they're all already in the game, and for the top comment, there is no AMX 10 rc with a stab, all the tanks you listed are non function prototypes, already in the game, or 4th gen, with the sole exception of the EBRC Jaguar
      I am a French main and I do think this is lazy, but also France has been lacking with no vehciles in real life due to a smaller industrial base to something like Germany, there simply aren't as many French Designs as people think
      while a merger with the Beneluxe tree might seem lazy, mostly just German mains who complain about not getting other nations into their tree as well, Germany doesn't need more Leopards

  • @ThaGr1m
    @ThaGr1m Місяць тому +24

    as someone who drives trains, the wagons are 20 tonnes empty minimum, the fact a 70 tonne tank pings them away like a pinball is really kinda dumb, I'm not saying you shouldn't be able to move them, but them flying away is a bit much, it should be closer to a truck hitting a car even though the weight disparaty get to 10x there instead of the 3x here.
    if we are talking loaded wagons depending on substance they can easily go to 60 tonnes themselves, which is useally the weight they carry, in some instances like heavy ore, they can go to 90 tonnes a wagon, meaning the tank would be carrying more than it's own weight, but I don't think there is any metal/ ore wagons on the map.
    all in all, I get the idea but them beeing basically balloons is rediculous

    • @user-mc9cv9zw3x
      @user-mc9cv9zw3x Місяць тому +1

      Agreed you’d expect more from a game developer who’s revenue is over 100,000,000.

  • @shikikanaz4624
    @shikikanaz4624 Місяць тому +159

    Gaijin refusing to give new tornado its fnf missiles while russia still has fnf missiles and new ones at that

    • @Penguinius
      @Penguinius Місяць тому +20

      Proof that IRL NATO is OP, can't be having that in game.

    • @Reddsoldier
      @Reddsoldier Місяць тому +21

      Weapons with no counterplay potential can only go in the Soviet tree, sorry!
      Pantsir, Vikhrs and now a "gps bomb" that completely negates the downsides of GPS bombs because you can saturate an entire area with it? You bet!

    • @Derp12348
      @Derp12348 Місяць тому +5

      And they also didn’t added the storm shadow (French/British)

    • @F14DSUPERTOMCAT
      @F14DSUPERTOMCAT Місяць тому +6

      they even show the bombs being complete failures when trying to make some argument that "Oh dont worry about us giving you lobotomised brimstones, look more paveways!!!"

    • @j.k1688
      @j.k1688 Місяць тому

      AGM114L is sitting in the gaijin garbage can still...

  • @Rektic9317
    @Rektic9317 Місяць тому +8

    10:46 "We have the F-15E Strike Eagle"
    The Focke Wulf 190 in question: 👁️👄👁️

  • @westerlywind1035
    @westerlywind1035 Місяць тому +94

    You OK Tom, you're getting crazy cat lady hair

    • @dicecorporation
      @dicecorporation Місяць тому +28

      Who is this cute little lesbian?

    • @M4_Soppi_2
      @M4_Soppi_2 Місяць тому +12

      @@westerlywind1035 the haircut is cute

    • @rogueguerrilla4902
      @rogueguerrilla4902 Місяць тому +19

      ​@@M4_Soppi_2 I dont think that's cute.

    • @M4_Soppi_2
      @M4_Soppi_2 Місяць тому +6

      @@rogueguerrilla4902 then complain, nobody care about your judgement

    • @rogueguerrilla4902
      @rogueguerrilla4902 Місяць тому +12

      ​@M4_Soppi_2 That's not complaining, I simply said that I don't appreciate the hairstyle nor think the hairstyle is cute. And I could just say: nobody cares about your opinion.

  • @VangorPlay
    @VangorPlay Місяць тому +164

    If brimstone was Russian it would come with 100% capacity.

  • @knowahnosenothing4862
    @knowahnosenothing4862 Місяць тому +156

    No justice for Brimstones and Longbows. No fix, no monies.
    F-111A still can't fold wings to 45 degrees with gun pods on, needs fix.
    Starstreak still bugged and unusable unless using a controller or console aim assist.
    Pantsir needs BR change to 13.7.

    • @rodneycook3674
      @rodneycook3674 Місяць тому +9

      Pantsir shuts down nato CAS so hard. And people are like just fly correctly but it doesn’t matter if it’s possible to counter its how much it makes CAS time inefficient to make a difference in the game because you are evading the whole time

    • @agnesakioyamen2576
      @agnesakioyamen2576 Місяць тому

      @@rodneycook3674Busy still whining and watch UA-camrs do it with ease without bitching and a great example of this would be Hunter

    • @Velolyn
      @Velolyn Місяць тому +2

      More missiles, SACLOS vs FnF, spawn inside any range advantage the S1 can have, easy reloading, the ability to go behind cover on any map, and now you need self-searching munitions? Ones that can be all launched with no way for you to be shot down? While there's also no way to shoot all the munitions down? Great idea.

    • @Slavic_Goblin
      @Slavic_Goblin Місяць тому +2

      God forbid that jets would get something inaccurate, right?
      SAM's being inaccurately portrayed is A-Ok of course.

    • @TheXquest7
      @TheXquest7 Місяць тому

      Pantsir is destroying SQB mode, why still it has no other nation alternative?

  • @legendwarsdigon7789
    @legendwarsdigon7789 Місяць тому +59

    something Gijian got wrong the f-117 DOES HAVE FLARES AND CHAFF i searched it up and even talked to talk to a special someone. Bottom back end 13in from the back tails holding 86pods. yes its low but it has counter measures in a small compartment that opens you can even look at a photo underneath the aircraft and see the door to it. O and don't forget the f-16 parashoot ether/OR THE NIGHHAWK/and the f-117 does use radar reflectors/jammers but we all know Gijian may be too Russian bias to add this because its too OvEr poWeRd and they simply don't like USA so their going for the MINUMUM.

    • @legendwarsdigon7789
      @legendwarsdigon7789 Місяць тому

      those are not f-15 cons

    • @kochiyoshi
      @kochiyoshi Місяць тому +15

      source: Dude Trust Me

    • @sealioso
      @sealioso Місяць тому +5

      other planes have jammer that aren't implemented

    • @legendwarsdigon7789
      @legendwarsdigon7789 Місяць тому

      @@sealioso i wish

    • @legendwarsdigon7789
      @legendwarsdigon7789 Місяць тому

      @@kochiyoshi for the f-15 it covers almost its hole back like a cover not what they showed surch it/f-15 high g-pull cons

  • @COMRADE_PALIKOV
    @COMRADE_PALIKOV Місяць тому +69

    they said the patriot is not a useable thing just an air defense for airfields or just for cinematic

    • @PWB06
      @PWB06 Місяць тому +3

      I think most reasonable people expected that

  • @kane28tyberium
    @kane28tyberium Місяць тому +19

    So I guess the F-117 would be a fun toy for GRB, but farming modules is impossible on it. Like totally impossible. Pure GE vehicle.

    • @JaykeBlayde
      @JaykeBlayde Місяць тому +3

      Similar to helis

    • @ARCtrooper_bliz02
      @ARCtrooper_bliz02 Місяць тому

      Its a squadron vehicle because i mean first stealth fighter everyone is gonna go mad for it so they are gonna make mad money and squadron doesn’t give grind perks like premiums

    • @kane28tyberium
      @kane28tyberium Місяць тому +1

      @@ARCtrooper_bliz02 it’s hardly a fighter.

  • @themub9477
    @themub9477 Місяць тому +72

    Why don't you guys just give leopards to every nation and remove german ground forces from top tier?

    • @Ryan-go6id
      @Ryan-go6id Місяць тому +5

      lmao

    • @coloneljason9094
      @coloneljason9094 Місяць тому +2

      Blame the Germans selling leopards to every country with cheap price.

    • @kiranplays2688
      @kiranplays2688 Місяць тому +6

      I feel this one man! what is the point of playing Germany anymore? im going to strart the Italian grind since you get the 2A7 and have very good CAS options in gripen and the Mangusta.
      Germany has 0 good CAS options at top tier and 0 good Fighters to counter enemy CAS. the F4 can't fight F16s and F15s and Su27SM.
      The heli that used to be something is now a hit simulator with the PARS hitting tracks or engine of Tanks instead of one shotting them like it is supposed to.

    • @potatouno
      @potatouno Місяць тому +2

      Same can be said regarding T-72/90s. It's not gaijin's fault, it's globalization.

    • @tezbertzero1915
      @tezbertzero1915 Місяць тому

      @@potatouno And with early usa jets as well f15s

  • @FireStarLP
    @FireStarLP Місяць тому +32

    Im sorry you remove the Viggens Tracers because its "not historical accurat" but than remove the historical accurat capabilities of the groms… okay Gaijin

    • @bagelmaster2498
      @bagelmaster2498 Місяць тому +4

      Or the brimstones

    • @kiranplays2688
      @kiranplays2688 Місяць тому +4

      one is a Russian vehicle and the other one isn't. this isn't rocket since man! Russia will always come first for these Shady devs.

    • @Kyle_Train
      @Kyle_Train Місяць тому

      So you wanna fight aganst Rokets that have 12+ km range that are fire and forget and with all that they sreach ther own target it ? yeah sounds fair to me rather have an su25sm3 shot at the and shot the kh38 that is flying towards me sins radars can lock on rokets and bomb´s now .

    • @FireStarLP
      @FireStarLP Місяць тому

      @@Kyle_Trainyea, since I play Brittain that’s the case lmao, also you can’t really complain about fire and forget especially since no one really cared about that when the Phoenix Missiles came out. Also you can fire missiles at the enemy missiles 😂 like you said. And don’t forget that currently the SPAA is stronger than most Aircraft’s anyways.

    • @Kyle_Train
      @Kyle_Train Місяць тому

      @@FireStarLP The f14 Tomcat was the one of the broken jet fighter that has bin addet only one with active radar for a long time the only one that did not complain about it that was the goblins that used it because it takes "skill" to use an fox 3 roket . And with the SPAA i think you brain lagged more then it should most aircraft´s are stronger then spaa´s because no realy new Spaa´s are geting addet like patriot because it would make flying an aircraft impossible .

  • @DarkHorse_Marine_TTV
    @DarkHorse_Marine_TTV Місяць тому +7

    Best showcase in this video is the new train car physics !

  • @rodneycook3674
    @rodneycook3674 Місяць тому +8

    “Sabra will be a good line up vehicle.” Literally nothing near 10.0 in the tech tree

  • @matymoton2211
    @matymoton2211 Місяць тому +14

    Germany still forgotten nation in AIR XD compare that new SU to their phantom xD Any plans in this patch to add special vehicle or no? @War Thunder. Official channel.

    • @DevinEMILE
      @DevinEMILE Місяць тому

      Its not uncommon for them to just leave nations hanging at top tier for years, Sweden and Britain had nothing until the gripen that could compete against f16s

  • @SquiddyKraken
    @SquiddyKraken Місяць тому +89

    no df 105, no amx 13 105, no prototype leclerc, leclerc s1 and s2 still at rank 6 with 12.0br and no apfsds stock, gaijin really hates france

    • @frenchcpl
      @frenchcpl Місяць тому +6

      Always has been, same on with french planes like the m2k, they nerfed it like 5 times and insanely nerfed the MICA EM

    • @alvinhenriksson6439
      @alvinhenriksson6439 Місяць тому

      bro they just added 2 of the best top tier tanks to france

    • @SquiddyKraken
      @SquiddyKraken Місяць тому +9

      @@alvinhenriksson6439 france doesn't need leopard 2 they need a plethora of french vehicles from 8.0 to 11.7

    • @Watermelon-Cato
      @Watermelon-Cato Місяць тому +2

      Who doesn’t.

    • @alvinhenriksson6439
      @alvinhenriksson6439 Місяць тому +1

      @@SquiddyKraken yeah I agree it would be better to get native French tanks but the leopard will make top tier a lot better

  • @DaYemenball
    @DaYemenball Місяць тому +3

    The hit replay thing will be incredibly important for ground because, as Phlydaily will tell you, something magical happens and it makes no sense. Seeing it in a bit replay can help people deter in if it was because the other guy was skilled, had great luck, or if the game did something magical.

  • @Swayer774
    @Swayer774 Місяць тому +11

    I Truly wish the Mig 31 to be added to warthunder

  • @justthatguyjayce
    @justthatguyjayce Місяць тому +3

    Atp the Leopard is probably just Gaijin's filler for when time runs out and they still have nations left

  • @Mean_Beans_
    @Mean_Beans_ Місяць тому +66

    Please add new game modes

    • @homiespaghetti1522
      @homiespaghetti1522 Місяць тому +4

      This is what I think WT needs most, not new vehicles

    • @kaproskarleto5136
      @kaproskarleto5136 Місяць тому +7

      Woah woah woah, what do you want in this game? Fun?

  • @Chronesys
    @Chronesys Місяць тому +24

    One spaa for italy is always welcome but we still don't have a True top br spaa. Also where is the centauro 2 or the centauro draco?

    • @SomeWarthunderGuy
      @SomeWarthunderGuy Місяць тому +7

      Just be glad the Italians got a Sam, next Italian aa will come in a few years 😭

    • @Chronesys
      @Chronesys Місяць тому +1

      @@SomeWarthunderGuy i Wish i could Say you are wrong but you are right

    • @maxalator
      @maxalator Місяць тому +1

      In order to counter the USSR air tree, Italy needs access to DART rounds

    • @Iden_in_the_Rain
      @Iden_in_the_Rain Місяць тому +1

      It’s also copypaste….

    • @Chronesys
      @Chronesys Місяць тому

      @@maxalator i would be fine with that. I like the idea of a Draco with dart rounds

  • @GUNS4084
    @GUNS4084 Місяць тому +43

    When will the AH-1Z helicopter receive its AGM-65 Maverick missiles???

    • @amarg.247
      @amarg.247 Місяць тому +3

      They’ll probably never add that. There’s a better chance they’ll add the longbow hellfires before they add mavericks to a helicopter

    • @itcih
      @itcih Місяць тому

      They would be unusable.

    • @fakenate9871
      @fakenate9871 Місяць тому

      Was only used by the Iranians or earlier cobra variants like the AH-1J/T

  • @Cythil
    @Cythil Місяць тому +3

    As someone that actually have unlocked the whole American tree (pretty much) having the F-117 be a squadron plane means a lot of extra work for me. I guess I have to find a better squadron now... Else I would just have unlocked it the old fashion way.

  • @WOLFY_32
    @WOLFY_32 Місяць тому +53

    bro has 11 million golden eagles

    • @nevik2506
      @nevik2506 Місяць тому +4

      Gajin jumped the cost of GE $13 but the CC have more than they could ever use....
      How about a GE sale at xmas!!

  • @sosigakaweinerman869
    @sosigakaweinerman869 Місяць тому +2

    99% of these vehicles I will never have because it takes me at least two weeks of constant grinding to get just one top tier vehicle unlocked

  • @Jetpower485
    @Jetpower485 Місяць тому +5

    Hit analysis is a game changer for shrinking the learning curve!!!

    • @mjc2962
      @mjc2962 Місяць тому +1

      Half the time it's just gonna be volumetric BS

    • @williewilson2250
      @williewilson2250 Місяць тому +1

      ​@@mjc2962I had a heat shell bounce on the top hull plate of my m46 and it ricocheted into the ammo lmao

  • @yoface2537
    @yoface2537 12 днів тому +1

    21:22 no, the lvt works as an AA battery

  • @miguelreyna5398
    @miguelreyna5398 Місяць тому +4

    You know what extly we need? MORE LEOPARDS, come on add 5 more, why just 2??

  • @DaYemenball
    @DaYemenball Місяць тому +2

    Tortoise, T-95, T-28, Char 2C, and SU-100Y are gonna love plowing through the trains.

  • @chish7690
    @chish7690 Місяць тому +5

    Cant wait for people to bring the 117 into airRB and draw out the missions an extra 20 minutes.

    • @T95man
      @T95man Місяць тому

      Do people have the attention span of a 5 year old. Most games last 10, 12 minutes, most UA-cam videos last longer than that. I have played games where one game lasted an hour

  • @CtRAlTtAb
    @CtRAlTtAb Місяць тому +9

    I knew the F-117 would be added eventually. Too bad I'm taking a break from war thunder until winter, and I hope that they have ARB fixed by then

    • @mindset220
      @mindset220 Місяць тому

      I'm literally not even playing until they finally add F-18 and Mig-31... those should have been added before stealth

    • @CtRAlTtAb
      @CtRAlTtAb Місяць тому

      @@mindset220 stealth is pretty much the only thing the F-117 has. It's a nice introduction to stealth in war thunder, but it does feel a bit early for that

    • @JaykeBlayde
      @JaykeBlayde Місяць тому

      Since you're taking a break you won't be getting any weekly squadron RP for the F-117. sadge Me: about 1/3 to getting the Japan CTWV RCV since September. lol

    • @CtRAlTtAb
      @CtRAlTtAb Місяць тому

      @@JaykeBlayde oh that's ok i can just buy it

  • @nhientran4142
    @nhientran4142 Місяць тому +43

    Y'all doin everything but adding the f18

    • @Mareczechboy
      @Mareczechboy Місяць тому +4

      why would you need an F-18 when germany doesnt even have the Eurofighter

    • @neptune1292
      @neptune1292 Місяць тому +1

      The F/A-18 will be in the december update, thats almost sure.

    • @T95man
      @T95man Місяць тому

      They do everything to avoid touching bombers like the b52. The f18 is extremely likely compared to something like the b52

    • @seskorirkeashimrui3556
      @seskorirkeashimrui3556 Місяць тому

      @@Mareczechboy The Legacy F-18s /A-C are less capable than the freaking eurofighter germany will get the Swiss Hornets

    • @potatouno
      @potatouno Місяць тому

      Y'all really can't wait for december update, can y'all?

  • @ferrma81
    @ferrma81 Місяць тому +2

    I would love to see a Person next to tanks or aircrafts in the hangar. Tanks in videogames always look kinda small and that way you could already see in the hangar how huge this things are

  • @only_for_d_point
    @only_for_d_point Місяць тому +26

    When German air

    • @skyffed
      @skyffed Місяць тому +6

      when america gets the f22 we'll get the f16

    • @wh6057
      @wh6057 Місяць тому +8

      Silly German thinks he can have a viable top tier 🤣 instead we will give every nation better leopards then your own

    • @theol.1988
      @theol.1988 Місяць тому +2

      When USA gets a B-21 with a Laser that kills from 40km, then Germany can have another MiG-29 or possibly even an Su-27...
      Nooo lets not, actually. We'll give em a Me-262 variant without Guns first.

    • @IronDragonslayerArmour
      @IronDragonslayerArmour Місяць тому

      every video, bro, the 109 always here😂

    • @Kyle_Train
      @Kyle_Train Місяць тому

      @@wh6057 Well rather have an worse leopard then others then one of the worst tech trees in wt ( america ) only good thing about it is airforce that´s it

  • @Arctic2010
    @Arctic2010 Місяць тому +1

    Still waiting for the German air tree to get fun at top tier 😭

  • @K1ng_Rat
    @K1ng_Rat Місяць тому +3

    At this point t- 80 and abrmas is a rare tank in top tier. It's all Leopads

    • @interpl6089
      @interpl6089 Місяць тому

      Because they are the most broken. 80% empty space and 20% spall liner.

  • @Event_LUNAE_Horizon
    @Event_LUNAE_Horizon Місяць тому +23

    With every update I am asking myself why did I bother to grind for german top tier, both in air and ground. Dont make mistake of grinding germany past WW2. Just grind literally any other tree.

    • @schnitzel_enjoyer
      @schnitzel_enjoyer Місяць тому +3

      fr, i dont want to continue beyond 10.0

    • @the_fat_hans7755
      @the_fat_hans7755 Місяць тому

      We need are cool prototypes and leo demonstrators

    • @schnitzel_enjoyer
      @schnitzel_enjoyer Місяць тому +4

      @@the_fat_hans7755 that won't help every top tier match being leo2 vs t90m

    • @potatouno
      @potatouno Місяць тому

      Don't worry, eurofighter in december

    • @indeedDE01
      @indeedDE01 Місяць тому +5

      I am slowly getting to the new PUMA VJTF and I have also gotten to a third of the Leo 2A7V but it is hard to continue grinding since there aren't any new interesting vehicles to get to, like where is the PzH 2000?
      We already have the VIDAR and M109s.

  • @unselling1822
    @unselling1822 Місяць тому +23

    4:50 you know it's going to be a garbage plane when the game dev says it's going to be USELESS!, what the hell was the point of wasting your time making this thing anyways if it's just "useless"

    • @SchlopFlopper
      @SchlopFlopper Місяць тому +19

      It’s a test of stealth mechanics before the 5th gen’s come out. The F-117 isn’t a great aircraft irl so something like it isn’t a bad idea to use for experimenting how players use and react to it without introducing something stupidly powerful like… The Raptor.

    • @xenomorphlad9895
      @xenomorphlad9895 Місяць тому +6

      Why do you think it's a squadron?
      Also it was added to have a gateway for Stealth.
      Considering it was the first stealth aircraft irl, I feel it's a great test bed for the mechanic!
      Which will have the way for much more useful stealth aircraft

    • @sealioso
      @sealioso Місяць тому +6

      because people have been begging for it knowing it'd be bad lol, it's so iconic

    • @SamsungMicrowaveOven
      @SamsungMicrowaveOven Місяць тому

      literally every gen 5 aircraft is Classified, they are not being added to Warthunder, they've already stated this before ​@@SchlopFlopper

    • @sergey.badadyan
      @sergey.badadyan Місяць тому +1

      @@SamsungMicrowaveOven we already have a lot of stuff that is classified. They'd just need to rely on public information.
      If they don't add new top-tier vehicles, the game will lose the playerbase and eventually die. So 5th gen in a couple of years is the only option they have. Though they will delay the introduction of it for as long as possible. Just to extand the lifetime of the game.

  • @RubyFox_YT
    @RubyFox_YT Місяць тому +3

    Please let us test fly any plane fully modified so we can know what we are shooting for. 🙏

  • @GabrielHenriqu3
    @GabrielHenriqu3 Місяць тому +11

    Gaijin, where are more modern battleships ? At least some of The cold war ? Also The aircraft carriers and, of course, submarines, that are already at The mobile version...

    • @everettstrait311
      @everettstrait311 Місяць тому

      Fr

    • @OK-qj9lw
      @OK-qj9lw Місяць тому +1

      I’m pretty sure we don’t have them yet because;
      1.The models are MASSIVE and likely very expensive to make.
      2.Not many people play naval in the first place, so it’s not worth the effort.
      We’ll probably get them eventually but Gaijin is currently letting naval just die slowly.

  • @NollieFlipX
    @NollieFlipX Місяць тому +1

    Dude those changes to the Test Flight are prety good! Thank you very much! I hope some day we can increase the density of targets or maybe even get targets doing some kind of zig zags just for training. In fact, imortal targets would be welcome too we just need a hit indicator really. As for tanks, more specifically AAs I hope we get a selector for altitude and ammount of targets some day too. But anyways that's pretty good! Thanks again! Also instant reload for weapons in Test Flight would be nice.

  • @seekerpro486
    @seekerpro486 Місяць тому +6

    24:20 great, ace combat is in the game.

  • @ZeePanzer
    @ZeePanzer Місяць тому +1

    the thing about the F117, is that although the radar can actually pick it up sometimes, against Fox 1s without DL that 1sec the radar lose lock and reaquire, its enough to make a missile like an AIM7F be totally defeated, doesnt work against Fox 3s or the R27ER though.

  • @Tango_Mango1
    @Tango_Mango1 Місяць тому +14

    Fact we can’t use brimstones how they are supposed to be used is so dumb. No one plays Britain, maybe like 3 players or less per game. Then the chances that the grinded out to get the jet with the missile, I think it should be as good as it would be irl. So Britain can finally get something good. It’s not like is Russia, Germany, or America, where that’s what fills up pretty much the entire team

  • @nicholasleon7819
    @nicholasleon7819 Місяць тому +1

    never thought the day would come where i was scrubbing through these videos solely looking for new bluewater ships...

  • @ignatiusbrechnuss3896
    @ignatiusbrechnuss3896 Місяць тому +3

    With the addition of Leopard 2s in the french Techtree there is NO INCENTIVE FOR ANYONE to play the german Techtree anymore. The dutch ground forces are literally integrated into the german ground forces in real life. And yet gaijin decides to add them to france. I will not continue to play and support this game any further. Ridiculous!

  • @matsbacklund6471
    @matsbacklund6471 Місяць тому +2

    When will we get AA capable of 17km+ engagements? We already have planes capable of spawning, locking and drop, drop ,drop,dropping bombs already...

  • @user-mc9cv9zw3x
    @user-mc9cv9zw3x Місяць тому +8

    you know this is a warthunder classic bc theres nothing "NEW" for sweden

    • @kiranplays2688
      @kiranplays2688 Місяць тому +2

      bro, Sweden has a loaded top tier lien up and Sweden isn't even part of the main 5 nations that started the game

    • @user-mc9cv9zw3x
      @user-mc9cv9zw3x Місяць тому

      @@kiranplays2688 doesn’t matter it’s a nation they put in the game they shouldn’t start neglecting it now

    • @kv2_tank
      @kv2_tank Місяць тому

      ​@@user-mc9cv9zw3x welcome to the club mate

    • @Kyle_Train
      @Kyle_Train Місяць тому

      @@kiranplays2688 Just ignore him ppl like him want every update something for ther nation

    • @user-mc9cv9zw3x
      @user-mc9cv9zw3x Місяць тому

      @@Kyle_Trainyup let me not expect one thing that’s new to one nation from a game developer who’s revenue is over $100,000,000 yup my fault that’s just too much for them to do.

  • @sirilluminarthevaliant2895
    @sirilluminarthevaliant2895 Місяць тому +4

    You know. Stealth before ECM radar jammers and anti radar missiles is bonkers

  • @_lu.cks.
    @_lu.cks. Місяць тому +3

    F-117 is going to be an beast on sim battles

    • @l3taggs
      @l3taggs Місяць тому +1

      Me when the absolute BEAST only carries two bombs and does NOTHING else

  • @Rosaslav
    @Rosaslav Місяць тому

    Nice to see some work being done on Anti Aliasing! I also like the changes on destructible objects on maps!

  • @NN1Ckl.
    @NN1Ckl. Місяць тому +4

    Can we just get more numerous big maps? Like red desert size and bigger for real long range engagements?

    • @JaykeBlayde
      @JaykeBlayde Місяць тому +1

      Speaking of Red Desert ... notice how the vehicles don't get dirty on that map... they stay clean the whole time.

  • @harryshuman9637
    @harryshuman9637 Місяць тому +2

    Gaijin be like:
    - F-4E (Early) dominates too much with its TV-guided bomb at 8.7.... lets move it to 9.3...
    - Hey, so lets add stealth bomber with laser guided bombs to 8.7.

  • @kozachok870
    @kozachok870 Місяць тому +9

    This is *****, how to add a hellfire with homing up to 10 km is imba, but how to add an X-38 with an inertial system + infrared guidance that ignores heat traps is not imba, but especially + a more dangerous carrier X-38 Su-34, and at the same time no SAM to the West

    • @lw.c802
      @lw.c802 Місяць тому

      Single f16 with aim120 eat su34, just like in Ukraine

    • @interpl6089
      @interpl6089 Місяць тому

      @@lw.c802 Never happened bruh, the kill is NOT confirmed. Meeanwhile what's confirmed is 2 F-16s lost and at least 4 damaged by Kinzhal strike.

  • @Operator_Oak
    @Operator_Oak Місяць тому +1

    I hope there are more stealth planes bc i want for something more like uavs but use like a sr-71 and give callouts from thousands of meters up to your team down below especially in sim and rb and just a suggestion make the uavs have more atgms but make them cost more maybe 900 or 850

  • @vx.556
    @vx.556 Місяць тому +9

    the F-15E is missing its AGM-130s

    • @nightshadedawn
      @nightshadedawn Місяць тому +9

      F-111F has been missing them since launch. I'm not surprised though, why give us a long ranged AGM when instead they could give russia another SPAA.

    • @nikolaisuterovich
      @nikolaisuterovich Місяць тому

      And AIM-120B

    • @Phoenix1.s
      @Phoenix1.s Місяць тому +2

      @@nikolaisuterovichthe aim120a and b are identical ingame right now

    • @vx.556
      @vx.556 Місяць тому

      @14thbkrctsecks yo

    • @nikolaisuterovich
      @nikolaisuterovich Місяць тому

      @@Phoenix1.s Well that is a shame isn’t it

  • @NollieFlipX
    @NollieFlipX Місяць тому +1

    I wonder if it would be a good idea to give AA's ammo reloads at spawn to help with the CAS problem

  • @cursed_cat28
    @cursed_cat28 Місяць тому +20

    Cmon Gaijin, at least add NASAMs or sth like it, give some better SAMs to NATO

    • @Lowkicksfordayz
      @Lowkicksfordayz Місяць тому +4

      It’s a Russian game lmao

    • @interpl6089
      @interpl6089 Місяць тому

      Will the NASAMS fail so often just like irl and fall on children's hospital, only to blame Russia? Meanwhile there's photo evidence of it being NASAMS.

  • @ARCtrooper_bliz02
    @ARCtrooper_bliz02 Місяць тому +2

    Great put even more leopards in the game because i don’t see those enough 🗿🗿

  • @browning2471
    @browning2471 Місяць тому +7

    Tom please wash your hair and get it styled. I understand the frustration as a long hair haver but your hair has SO MUCH potential

    • @diceshard2436
      @diceshard2436 Місяць тому +2

      ​@@M4_Soppi_2 he gave that advice with a lot of respect to be honest. The guy (I assume) in the right corner deservers some serious roast

    • @M4_Soppi_2
      @M4_Soppi_2 Місяць тому

      @@diceshard2436 my bad I misread

  • @ryanweintraub9448
    @ryanweintraub9448 Місяць тому +1

    I still think its funny we got the F-117 before ANY of the F/A-18s

  • @bagel_thunderYT
    @bagel_thunderYT Місяць тому +4

    19:30 I’d be excited that NATO gets some better SPAA. But Germany tends to be paired with Russia soo…

  • @Wayoftrick
    @Wayoftrick Місяць тому

    Many say f117 won’t be very effective as an attacker because of limited armament capabilities, so maybe he should get something like spotting capabilities like the drones or recon vehicles have to spot enemies on battlefield for your team.

  • @Reddsoldier
    @Reddsoldier Місяць тому +31

    Lmao they were trying so hard to make the Tornado Gr4 not sound like it had been kneecapped pre-even entering the dev server.
    Just give up on pretending you care about the UK/Commonwealth tech tree until you get someone who wasn't born east of Minsk to manage it please. I could honestly write a short book on the non-functional or missing things on existing vehicles in the British tech tree and now you have the balls to add a vehicle that you are telling us IN THE DEV BLOG is deliberately not as good as it actually is!
    Can you imagine if they ever, gaijin forbid, did that to anything in the Soviet or US tech tree? Imagine if over a year ago they'd gone "oh yeah there's no counterplay to the Pansir having 12km range mouse aim missiles, so we're going to artificially make them the same range as other top tier SAMs". or 4 years ago they said "Oh yeah, we know Vikhrs IRL have a claimed range of 10,000 km so we're going to just limit them to the same range as Hellfires". Something tells me that never crossed their mind then but the MOMENT there was a British system that they couldn't gimp in some dumb way or add a direct soviet equivalent, suddenly there was a limit to what they could and couldn't do. I'd genuinely rather not have the Brimstones if you aren't willing to make them at the very least another type of F&F.

    • @coloneljason9094
      @coloneljason9094 Місяць тому

      Lad Gayjin hates every nation in game expect Russia. Because they know if they slightly portray any Western vehicle it'd stomp the commies of the floor.

  • @Masterchief6865
    @Masterchief6865 Місяць тому +1

    F117 being free is making me edge rn

  • @thechef7438
    @thechef7438 Місяць тому +6

    I hope Japan gets something as you said.

  • @gopnikprince8000
    @gopnikprince8000 Місяць тому +1

    Whenes the Calliope aiming gonna get fixed, rockets aim separate of the barrel and are instead guided by the 3rd person cursor which makes firing over obstacles very difficult

  • @simo7663
    @simo7663 Місяць тому +5

    Good times to be a Sweden tree player. When russia gets handed with both hands, swedes get nada. Well, no need to play before next update

    • @interpl6089
      @interpl6089 Місяць тому +1

      Bruh. Current Swedish top tier is the BEST in the game. Gripens are insane and Strv 122s are just broken. Meanwhile USSR has piss poor T-90M and T-80BVM.

    • @simo7663
      @simo7663 Місяць тому +1

      @@interpl6089 Didn't mean they should get new top tier stuff. Just new toys to play with. Whatever rank.

  • @kau9058
    @kau9058 Місяць тому +1

    Why is the Luchs at 7.3 if its a worse Wiesel and the Italian R3 with the same pen and a gunnerles turret sits at 6.0? What should it be better at because it's bigger than both.

  • @kerotomas1
    @kerotomas1 Місяць тому +13

    For the love of God give us a FW190 series HD model already. it's been 12 freaking years. Even meaningless planes got one already. It was produced in the same numbers as the Spitfire series and it's still using the outdated beta visual models.

    • @MDzmitry
      @MDzmitry Місяць тому

      109s are just as overlooked, they need both the model and the cockpit updates

    • @kerotomas1
      @kerotomas1 Місяць тому

      @@MDzmitry 109s got their HD visual model already, also got a cockpit update last year..

    • @MDzmitry
      @MDzmitry Місяць тому

      @@kerotomas1 the only ones that come to mind are Italian Bf 109G-14 and Bf 109C.
      Others have old models and cockpits, like 2010 old

    • @kerotomas1
      @kerotomas1 Місяць тому

      @@MDzmitry The 109B got an updated cockpit too but as i searched for the others you are right, though the absolutely godawful 190 outer models need priority as most players only play arcade or rb where the cockpit hardly matters but i always have to throw up whenever i look at a 190

  • @officialboomtish214
    @officialboomtish214 Місяць тому +2

    24:58
    “It’s actually for cinematics, that sort of thing.”
    Pandramodo: ***heavy breathing***

  • @elitely6748
    @elitely6748 Місяць тому +7

    Watch everyone with an SU-34 start pulling Cobras!

    • @KodeKing-cc8pf
      @KodeKing-cc8pf Місяць тому

      They will proberly do like they did my gripen and nerf the hell out of the AOA as soon as people that grinded for it got it

    • @gustavocampaio2661
      @gustavocampaio2661 Місяць тому +2

      ​@@KodeKing-cc8pfyou are wrong that wont happen because its russian

    • @KodeKing-cc8pf
      @KodeKing-cc8pf Місяць тому +1

      True😂

    • @interpl6089
      @interpl6089 Місяць тому +1

      Su-27s already can and nobody does because losing all your speed is a death sentence in the F-15C MSIP Meta.

  • @MentalillnessPerson
    @MentalillnessPerson Місяць тому +2

    When are they gonna improve Battle Quality, I mean battle Quality is not judged by BR but by Tank role, most Arty tanks are not capable of Rushing, and Camping is the only option, mostly Arty tanks to Fire for Effect over a certain spot where enemy camping/defend a point, please make the battlefield even bigger than just a small map feel arcadey, I get it, some people hate that, but in modern it gonna be different kind of battle, maybe make a toggle option for Big Map battle instead of avoiding it completely?

  • @thereaper1526
    @thereaper1526 Місяць тому +4

    the Su-34 has a radar on its back

  • @DaYemenball
    @DaYemenball Місяць тому

    Ok, so them putting in as a squadron vehicle is one of the very few kind things they have done. I’m genuinely surprised and very glad that they wanted everyone to be able to get it for free and for GE and not making it exclusively premium or event vehicles.

  • @fembill
    @fembill Місяць тому +31

    I’m very sad, the F-15E is after the F-111F. The one aircraft I didn’t bother to grind because I thought the F-15E would be in the strike line or heavy fighter line. Edit: I am a fool to think gaijin would see reason.

    • @nikitawetstein3578
      @nikitawetstein3578 Місяць тому

      Is it?

    • @DragonTrooperIsCool
      @DragonTrooperIsCool Місяць тому +2

      @@nikitawetstein3578It may not be final but in this video it is. Kinda stupid of the devs to do this in my opinion bc from what Ik the F-15E isn’t a bomber

    • @hitmanabsolution4725
      @hitmanabsolution4725 Місяць тому

      @@DragonTrooperIsCool I agree with your opinion, F15E was developed after F15C so I thought they whould put it in heavy fighter line.

    • @fembill
      @fembill Місяць тому

      @@nikitawetstein3578 yep

    • @fembill
      @fembill Місяць тому +1

      @@DragonTrooperIsCoolit’s a multi-role, I understand why gaijoob put it under the F-111s, for balancing the tree. But it makes almost no sense.

  • @MitosTM7274
    @MitosTM7274 Місяць тому +4

    Yugoslavia when

  • @wifi_soldier5076
    @wifi_soldier5076 Місяць тому +1

    French players: can we please get a proper tech tree light tank at top teir with cannon and atgm.
    Gaijin: No, ×3 copy paste Leopards for you.

  • @영현김-e2d
    @영현김-e2d Місяць тому +3

    i thought usa was getting new top tier aa but i guess not..... that's kinda disappointing

  • @adhx7506
    @adhx7506 Місяць тому +2

    So when does Germany get some other tanks to "flesh out their line ups"? We literally got one TT-2A4 and thats it. Give us Poland or Switzerland already.

  • @kampsie1841
    @kampsie1841 Місяць тому +9

    Stealth before the Eurofighter, tf are you smoking gaijin

    • @jjhalley8524
      @jjhalley8524 Місяць тому +1

      I mean the f117 entered service almost 2 full decades before the eurofighter so it seems about right

    • @potatouno
      @potatouno Місяць тому +1

      You acting like they adding F-35 or something lol, it's a stealth plane sure, but subsonic, no guns, no missiles, no flares, subsonic that carries 2 gbu's

    • @interpl6089
      @interpl6089 Місяць тому

      Eurofighter would be completely broken and would need a fair equivalent everywhere else. Su-35 for Russia, F-15C improved in USA and J-16 in China.

  • @bigtime9597
    @bigtime9597 Місяць тому +2

    F-117 at 8.7, as predicted. I always did say that this would be best case scenario for it. I saw a lot of people complaining about it having to face off against early cold war vehicles. So let me clear this up now. That isn't how BRs work. They work based on the performance of the aircraft, not the era it's from. Yes the F-117 is justified at its 8.7 BR for the following reasons:
    - As slow as a Sabre
    - No gun
    - No missiles
    - No radar
    - No countermeasures
    - Miniscule loadout
    - Poor turn rate
    - Poor climb rate (compared to contemporaries of the same era)
    You can fly an F-84G and still be able to kill this thing. The F-117 is that useless.

    • @williewilson2250
      @williewilson2250 Місяць тому

      Can't wait to see 10 f117s that are gonna essentially be free kills lmao

    • @interpl6089
      @interpl6089 Місяць тому

      It being 10.0 in ground is justified though? Surely Stingers and Strela won't be able to lock it from 10km when it will spam it's bombs from.

  • @spud4839
    @spud4839 Місяць тому +3

    Is it ok if you can consider lowering the me 262s br by like .5 or 1 br cuz 1 it would be more accurate and 2 planes like the f86 and f84 can’t pick on the 262s 👍

  • @BikZom
    @BikZom Місяць тому +3

    so its ok for f16 to spam ir mavs but not for the tornado to have the fnf brims lol

    • @Kyle_Train
      @Kyle_Train Місяць тому

      Goblin does not know what the Brim realy can do .

    • @achunkyduck9740
      @achunkyduck9740 Місяць тому

      @@Kyle_Trainand neither are they just laser guided, give them fnf and no target acquisition and they would be fine, this is literally doa

    • @Kyle_Train
      @Kyle_Train Місяць тому

      @@achunkyduck9740 would i have the britan tt searched i would not even use it the best jet for the at britan would be just the grippen all the time , and the grippen is even better then the phantom so not realy a point of using it even when it has FnF , why even use an tornado when the skys are dominated by f15/16 and grippen ?

    • @achunkyduck9740
      @achunkyduck9740 Місяць тому

      @@Kyle_Train yeahhh I’m genuinely getting dizzy trying to understand you there but I give it a good shot. A tornado with 9 faf brimstones and multiple guided bombs would be far better than any grip…

    • @Kyle_Train
      @Kyle_Train Місяць тому

      @@achunkyduck9740 how long can you survive with can tornado in the air ? how long in an dogfight ? and from what i saw it does not have a HMD so the aim 9m´s are not gona be that good but bette then every thing else that does not have aim 9m´s or some type of good ir missels

  • @maxdavidyermolaev4164
    @maxdavidyermolaev4164 Місяць тому

    the afterburner is still like a lightsaber, dont change its stracture when manuvering

  • @BoweryTundra396
    @BoweryTundra396 Місяць тому +3

    GIVE ITALY A SQUADRON VEHICHLE!!!!!!!!!

    • @nicolasarmas4763
      @nicolasarmas4763 Місяць тому

      Wich one is your suggest?
      I like to see the tr 85 from rumania or the m60 Leonardo

    • @BoweryTundra396
      @BoweryTundra396 Місяць тому +1

      @@nicolasarmas4763 from what I saw on the internet i like both of them

    • @nicolasarmas4763
      @nicolasarmas4763 Місяць тому +1

      @@BoweryTundra396 yeeeah, those are my favs, hopefuly gaijin wont put them as a premium

  • @sagichnichtsowiesonicht7326
    @sagichnichtsowiesonicht7326 Місяць тому

    9:23, this feature seems to allow to remove the killcam from live matches, in the future without losing functionality.

  • @TheCamoguys
    @TheCamoguys Місяць тому +5

    F-117 being at 8.7 is insane I thought they would put it at 10.0 I guess not, Im not even going to mention the fact that its a squadron vehicle to

    • @Coolmethgamesfan
      @Coolmethgamesfan Місяць тому +8

      It’s 10.0 for ground. It’s pretty much useless in ARB so it makes sense. Plus it doesn’t fit into the tt because it would be a pain in the ass

    • @williewilson2250
      @williewilson2250 Місяць тому +2

      ​@@Coolmethgamesfanthey still won't limit attackers to 4 per team tho

    • @Coolmethgamesfan
      @Coolmethgamesfan Місяць тому +1

      @@williewilson2250 Yeh, there will be a horde of them who contribute nothing to whichever team their on in ARB. Which is going to be painful for their teammates.

  • @123matthewbaker
    @123matthewbaker Місяць тому

    23:45 well it depends, I was always taught to take as much runway as possible, so I follow the PAPIs (lights at the start of a runways half red half white means on path) then go below them once clear of obstacles, but there are a lot of people that just fully follow them, but that would mean you always land near the 1000ft marker which is a lot of wasted runway space.

    • @interpl6089
      @interpl6089 Місяць тому

      Just belly land, it's quicker.

  • @pierrepower3182
    @pierrepower3182 Місяць тому +3

    Wrong color scheme for f15i

    • @Dunnay48
      @Dunnay48 Місяць тому

      ikr

    • @xtodnfs549
      @xtodnfs549 Місяць тому

      Well, at least its thw color scheme for the regular f15 and not some other nonsense

  • @Mystalo
    @Mystalo Місяць тому +1

    The graphics look very nice