Missed a couple details on Bill Gate's introduction to IBM, his mom connected him with the CEO through her business relationships, and he was not the foremost expert on software development, he was and is an expert on contracts and using the patent system to his advantage.
@@nothinleader - Responsible upper class parents that actually teach the business to their children, instead of some bullshit "let kids be kids" philosophy that denies them the ability to leverage the family's knowledge and resources to climb ahead in life? A lot of people are completely lost when they turn 18 because their parents never taught them about adult life or any kind of career-related knowledge. Bill Gates WAS taught that career-related knowledge, and made excellent use of it.
@@nothinleader A vast majority of major breakthroughs, innovations, and advancements, in history, came from relatively young men. They then spend the rest of their lives building upon that. Sure, an older guy, overseeing the young bucks doing the work, might get the glory, but the actual work and innovation generally comes from the youth who don't know "that thing can't be done".
Also, IBM was in a legal war w/ the DOJ so MS got a much better deal from them than otherwise would've been possible (i.e. IBM would've never licensed DOS let alone let MS sell it to competitors).
Give credit where credit is due. Sometimes the best of the best are not known because they fail to rise up for many reasons. Bill Gates was and has always been a software genius even in middle school.
"Bill knew more about software development than any one else at the time." Then proceeds to tell that Microsoft bought MS DOS from other company. Bill is genius but he is not the most intelligent person, he just happened to be a son of respected Mary Gates who happens to be connected to IBM's CEO John Opel.
"Then proceeds to tell that Microsoft bought MS DOS from other company." But that's not what he said. 3:16 He said that he (Gates) bought and existing OS and modified into what would become MS DOS. Also, he bought that OS to build upon as a time saving measure, not because he wasn't capable of doing it himself. I'm not some Bill Gates fanboy, but I think you're discrediting unfairly. At least in regards to this particular event.
@@The88Cheat I don't recall him saying he modified the DOS code he bought, I don't know why he would say that since he didn't change any of the code. Tim Patterson wrote the first version of the program to work like the CP/M operating system but run on Intel 8086 processors, which the IBM PC used. Gates paid $75,000 for the code and then struck a licensing deal with IBM, which needed an operating system. He simply called it MS DOS. Bill basically invented drop-shipping. Tim ended up working at Microsoft as part of the MS-DOS development team and later worked on MS Visual Basic. No Tims were harmed in the writing of this post.
Except he also was writing computer programs from 13 y/o, had his first software company at 17, had 1590/1600 on the SAT and graduate MCL from Harvard. But yeah, “not the most intelligent person”.
sorry to break you bubble but this isn't informative. It's very biased actually. Bill Gates got to where he got because of nepotism. And he fucked over the original creator of DOS.
I agree and expect a huge amount of new sub's watching a lot of this new content over the next few year's and beyond . not even blew up yet but its coming
We have turned into the infants of war because of corruption, devision, education. Yeah sure we might have alot of weapons but u need an entire army to win a war. America isnt a war country. Russia is. China is. North korea is. We would rather make tik toks . That tv invention was the last rusty nail in america coffin after the world wars. Lazy consumers that took life easy and did drugs. Such a strong nation
Basically every conflict in the middle east south America was funded by and for the protection of large corporations. It's not like those wars made any of our lives easier
in 2002 i was in tanks , we where looking at a new top of the line tank that just came in and it ran windows NT , i was mindblown , i didnt actually think microsoft where patching windows to be military i thought it was the tank developer
The us military can use more advanced controllers, and do for drones such as a reaper, but for smaller more conventional drones they found that soldiers are more comfortable using Xbox and ps3 controllers and find it easier to remember “combos” rather than a vast array of controls. According to a vender at a Association of the United Stares Army event.
@@notsojharedtroll23 thats not what he said......he said the controller is easier for them to understand.......which begs the question.....should ppl that are not smart enough to learn a different way to control something, should they really be in control of a multi-million dollar weapon?
X-Box put billions of dollars into making that controller feel and function near perfectly -- so why would you spend billions to make your own copy of what is already available ...? Because of the association with gaming ...? Silly .
In 1981 I was working with GM Defense Products for the program office supporting engineers doing R&D for what was to become the Stryker light armoured vehicle shown several times in your video. According to IBM, I purchased the first PC/IBM 5150 built with Microsoft operating system through a bulk corporate buy I set up. I audited IBM’s in-service file for warranty purposes and we got about the first 40 before another purchaser got one and they became a hot item.
5:17 The USS Yorktown in this instances was not an Aircraft carrier, it was a Ticonderoga Class Guided Missile Cruiser. CG-48, which was taken out of service in 2004 and is currently being dismantled for scarp. The two Carrier Yorktown's haven't been in service since 1942 when USS Yorktown CV-5 was sunk after the Battle of Midway, 1970 when USS Yorktown CV-10 was decommissioned.
I just watched two of your videos; this one on Microsoft and the other on Bolt after UA-cam recommended them. I have to say I am really impressed with the quality of your videos, they are incredibly well structured, informative and engaging. It goes without saying I am now a subscriber, I have no doubt you'll reach and exceed a 1 million subscribers if you keep up the quality of your videos.
4:39 - 4:59 they could have developed similar point and click environment for their linux system if they wanted. but that graphical GUI was always more heavy for resources. i think windows 11 now requires something like 8 gigabit of ram to work smoothly. and they could have custom-built their linux rock solid, in-house, never crashing. army could have owned their own licensing. don't want to be a hostage to one company, you know...
thats not the reason. its the case of privatisation vs gov effort. gov expects better performance from the private sector and at the time there werent many in that sector who could supply the government with their requirements. Sure linux was around but someone would have to develop not only the GUI but the interface to many of their systems and keep it a secret, so they would have to break open source licenses in the process. This means that they have to privately handle updates to the OS instead of just updating the OS whenever there was a new release. In comparison windows NT wasnt just used for warships but other CPU architectures and was the precursor to the modern windows desktop and server OS we use today. You will find a windows NT 4 for sparc which is one of the systems used in the defence industry as sun not only developed sun solaris but hardware that dealt with number crunching stuff and had GPUs that rivalled the best of consumer AGP slot GPUs. I have one of the old sun sparcs used in oil and gas, some of the components are modular in trays like the CPU and PSU. They were into ease of maintenance before it became a cool feature in desktop consumer cases too. Sun based their OS on unix and the longetivity of a company is important. IBM would only develop for their hardware and were a vendor who enjoyed locking others in. Sun didnt stick around long enough, granted their hardware was used in a lot of places and software too and had impressive server hardware that no x86 based manufacturer around ever made. 8 slot multi hundred core servers were around using sparc from sun long before today with hardware encryption part of the CPU long before AES went into intel/AMD. I remember drooling over sun servers long ago, with their $100k price tag. todays 96 corex2 multi hundred MB cache AMD servers cost $20k at least. not only that but sparc could handle up to 8 threads while intel/AMD SMT can only handle 2 threads.
I guess it goes without saying that the "Windows for Warships" edition includes the Minesweeper game. Got to keep the navy personnel sharp and on their toes 🙂
and don't forget to include... a dismal failure, utterly lacking, and extremely cringe worthy too. He left out anything one might consider important today, and was sure to include almost everything that was not. ---------------- Dude, for a second there, I thought you were about to propose. --------------- If all this sounds mean to you, then find my other comments and you'll know exactly why. (sort comments by date, with the newest being first, then start scrolling) if you still stand by your assessment of this video after reading all that, (the comments left by me) I will withdraw this "mean" comment, issue an apology. (and I'll even eat my hat)
Bill Gates was not the most knowledgeable person in software at that time. Gary Kildall and his company Digital Research were the foundation in personal computers. When IBM approached Bill, he told the to speak to Kildall. Bad timing and circumstance is why eventually Gates stepped up to IBM.
Hi Great Video, but i noticed a small mistake. You mentioned the USS Yorktown was an Aircraft Carrier. When infact the Yorktown in question (Yorktown CG-48) was a cruiser. I really dont blame you bc there are 4 Yorktowns and one was a carrier but i just wanted to put this right. Keep up the good work love your videos :)
From what I understand MS projects with the US military yield zero to little result. The latest big contract they have with the US military seems to be providing some cloud computing service and that is also splitter between other big companies. They don't seem to have any technological edge other other companies. Even though MS might have a long history with the military, but I don't think that can make them anything close to a military empire either.
Exactly. It's funny how this video seems like it started out with a conclusion designed to go viral. But then presents facts that doesn't support that conclusion. Especially funny, that a video about Microsoft has 5 minutes or so. Talking about The evolution of the US 'digital soldier programs' all the way from the 80's. And then at the end spends 10 seconds saying'Microsoft got involved, still not great'.
I worked with MS. I worked on the proposal that won the JEDI deal. MS has a considerable workforce just focusses on military. I can't disclose numbers, but the team that focuses on military apps and cloud is as big as any other super-big company.
00:00 🎮 Researching Google's work with military drones, noticed Air Force officer using Xbox controller to fly a $60 million drone. 0:42 🛠 Microsoft, traditionally known for spreadsheets, Word Documents, becomes a key part of the US military's technology strategy. 4:00 🚀 Bill Gates transforms Microsoft, dominates the PC software market with MS-DOS, sets the stage for the company's military involvement. 7:23 📉 Microsoft loses dominance in the computing industry during the 2000s, struggles in consumer internet and mobile devices. 9:01 👓 Microsoft's focus on augmented reality, wins a $22 billion military contract for the Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS). 13:13 🌐 Microsoft's cloud computing journey with Azure, wins a $10 billion contract for the Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure (JEDI) project. 19:10 💻 Microsoft wins JEDI over Amazon, Trump's influence questioned, but Microsoft's longstanding ties with the military played a crucial role.
In developed countries the game is almost always rigged ... Big businesses kill or buy ALL successful small businesses. In the end we will have just a handful of really really gigantic businesses.
Repent Israelites all praise to the most high YAHAWAH AND HIS SON YAHAWASHI🛸🤴🏽🦁 The so called black man, Latino, and Native Americans are the Israelites. Yahawah chosen people. Deuteronomy 7:6 “For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth.” Jeremiah 4:22 For my people is foolish, they have not known me; they are sottish children, and they have none understanding: they are wise to do evil, but to do good they have no knowledge. Luke 13:5 I tell you, Nay: but except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.
@@notapplicable4567 The new Bing isn't even out publicly though (unless im wrong and it is lol), so no one has a reason to get it. I personally have switched from Brave (well duckduckgo on brave) to (the developer version of) Bing, and I actually like the look of it, and the new Bing chat can actually be pretty useful. However I do not think we will ever go from "I'll Google it" to "Ill Bing It", I'm pretty sure Google has been immortalised in that regard.
With just a little more information this could’ve been a great video. The military isn’t ran off of excel. It’s ran off of Outlook and Power Point. Microsoft’s a more diversified company over AWS and Google and now with Microsoft leading the way with AI Search (that wasn’t mentioned) Bing is getting a lot of traction. The Ivas and Hololens projects were large but never a contender with Azure, everything that Ivas and Hololens did was done on Azure. Also you kept bringing up Bill, while he was obviously amazing and drove the company to new heights. Satya put thrusters on Microsoft and put it into space with where he’s brought the company. This was a very lackluster watch
I feel like I'm not even that old but I've lived through most of this and this video just feels like someone reading a wikipedia page. Windows was the only choice for the military. They had a monopoly until the 00's. It makes no sense to be like "In the mid 90's the military had to choose an OS between Linux and Windows" when Linux in the 90's was absolute dog shit. It was really a question of whether they were going to dump billions building an OS specifically for the military at a time when most of the talent was at Microsoft. Even after losing the monopoly lawsuit MS still managed to be a giant in the tech industry. It's like watching a video on how much influence a monopoly gives without understanding that it is a monopoly.
The $22bn they got for IVAS are probably several orders of magnitude above of what they put into that project. And I guess they'll continue to milk the military for further funds. To me IVAS looks like an upgraded version of the _Zielgerät 1229_ from 1944. Upgraded, because _Zielgerät 1229_ only had a (rather compact) 13kg backpack while IVAS features a (bulky) 20kg backpack. Oh well, IVAS can run Doom. _Zielgerät 1229_ obviously can't.
If you wanna be successful, you must take responsibility for your emotions, not place the blame on others. In addition to making you feel more guilty about your faults, pointing the finger at others will only serve to increase your sense of personal accountability. There's always a risk in every investment, yet people still invest and succeed. You must look outward if you wanna be successful in life...
Wow I know Mrs. Pamela and I have also been trading with her, She's such an amazing woman with good skills and keeps me happy all week knowing that I earn 15thousand extra income weekly trading with her.
yeah, she does, and in my opinion, it's a huge one and a chance for you to change your life with trading. I just bought my dream Mercedes from last week's profit. Thanks to her expertise.
the Altair reminds me of the clockworks that Look Mum No Computer puts together. i actually respect Bill Gates' hustle, pretty relentless p.s. like the soldiers i agree ms is easy to make fun of, but like an old car you can usually bang it with a wrench and get a result from it if you just try the same flawed procedure a second time
19:37 there is a world of difference between foul play and bantering about the commander in chief of a military until he revokes your contract. In the business world, it is not wise to speak ill to your clients. Had Bezos been smart about it, he would have simply waited until Trump was out of office to say anything ill advise. Yet with power comes ego, and with ego comes arrogance
The cloud is just somebody else's computer. Sending critical systems to the cloud is moronically stupid: it creates a single point of failure begging to be exploited.
5:17 That wasn't the aircraft carrier USS Yorktown (CV-10) that was affected in 1998. USS Yorktown (CV-10), the WW2-famous Fighting Lady, had long been decommissioned by then, since 1970. The USS Yorktown referred to in the incident was the Ticonderoga class cruiser CG-48. It served as the US Navy's testbed for the Smart Ship Program from 1996. The incident provided good lessons to the Navy and to the automation development community.
As of 2023 Microsoft has the contract for electronic security for Ukraine. They are also prepping to launch digital ID’s and digital currencies there aka social credit system.
I don't think using Linux would have been different to Windows in the divide by zero error. That is not the operating system. It is the program that runs on top of the operating system - which is different to the operating system.
In early NT4, an application could crash the OS (the complete machine) by passing unexpected values into kernel routines. No range checking, no input validation, no sanity checks on the kernel level. It is entirely possible that a bug in an application program could cause blue screens when the program tries to recover or tries to exit gracefully. I remember that trying to unpack an incomplete RAR file with WinRAR would reliably cause a blue screen. Heck, even receiving a TCP/IP packet from a non-Windows machine could crash NT4 under certain circumstances. Many sanity checks were added to the kernel routines via service packs. Of course, the real reason was that developers tried to cut corners. There sure was a lot of half-baked code in there - but it was also 25 years ago. Not sure how much similarly half-baked Linux had in the kernel at that time! All I remember was btrfs eating all my data.
actually the private company tech that shocked me the most was walking onto an AWACS 707 at an airshow and looking down a the workstations. I've seen those keyboards before ... Tandy TRS80.
I lived in Palo Alto and Mountain View in the 90's. I knew a few people in tech. It was a routine thing for companies to come into existence and develop a product far enough that it became concern or interest to Microsoft, Sun, Oracle so Microsoft or one of the others would buy them out and either adapt it to Microsoft or kill it. That still goes n today except it includes Google, Amazon, Apple, etc. How many promising technologies died back then which could have changed tings with a bit more development or an angel investor. Angel investors weren't always angels they would buy in and pitch it to Microsoft so Microsoft would buy it and do whatever they wanted with it resulting in a tidy profit. That still goes on today.
This makes sooo much sense in why we are feeding the tech industry at schools over other trades now. Meaning they give more funding to IT over cnc electricians etc
min 4:32 - Linux was not all that complete in 1991. Yes web servers were starting to pop up etc, but if you had more resources and wanted a stable system, you wend with SUN or BSD and others.Most were not free, BSD was open source. Linux is not UNIX, but rather unix like. It's great that people make videos, and of course we all learn somet8ing. But by spreading bad information we do a disservice to our own audience.
some of the first mass home computers were those such as Zx81 and Commodore. Most programs had to be manually written in, Zx81 only had tape deck. As commodore progressed even duel hard drives were available as third party products. Even the new models had an option to run as a earlier model to continue using older software. In general these machines were much more stable, less crashes. Now we are forced to buy newer models and throw away hundreds of dollers of old software because they won't work. It seems to be a industry alliance between Microsoft and software manufacturers to force us to keep spending money to be able to use our products. Maybe graphics weren't as good, but in general things like games were more playable. Now, my needs are simple, but even using programs such as Microsoft office is becoming unreliable, because Microsoft wants more money to upgrade. Systems like Unix are becoming more tempting
the good thing is if Terminators are based on MSFT tech, we are all safe. sooner than later there will be a bug, a blue screen etc. and we will just be able to kick the damn thing in the head
He's does philanthropist capitalism, where in everything he "helps" with he comes out making millions off of it. He's not in this game to help us players that's for sure.
He's no philanthropist, he's just returning stolen money way back when he suppressed competition and charged a premium for his products... It's sad that people in India appreciate him without knowing his backstory
You lost me on the word philanthropist. Calling him a scumbag would be a compliment. He engages in "philanthropy" as long as it is aligned with his goals, trying to repair his social damage on the way.
IBM wanted CP/M, not DOS. In the end the deal for CP/M did not happen as the founder had no interest in the business. This left IBM with only one choice.
This was very well done. Thanks. (missing the thumbnail at the end) Crimea IS, and will always BE - UKRAINE!! And... BAKHMUT STANDS! Slava Ukraini. Heroyam Slava!
@Dan Lyons Sounds like your copium has worn off Ivan. Just because a language is spoken outside of a country does not make it 'that country'! and those who don't want to stay as Ukrainians - can leave. Ukraine voted to leave the ussr - and russia erroneously thought they could just replace the ussr - it was putlins dream - to rebuild his former empire. He's stated he wants to rebuild that once-mighty empire. But - the entire rest of the world (minus belaras and north korea, syria and china) have said 'that's not happening vlad'. And Ukraine DID vote to split from that empire - you're right there. And there is NO WAY they are going to allow putin to try and rape and pillage his way to keep a seized land he INVADED. Nice try Ivan - up your copium and see if it kicks in. Crimea IS, and will always BE - UKRAINE!! And... BAKHMUT STANDS! Slava Ukraini. Heroyam Slava!
Going to gloss over how bill gates mom helped with that IBM contract. bill didn’t even have an operating system when he won the contract….how did he get the contract without a product. The rich help the rich.
Missed a couple details on Bill Gate's introduction to IBM, his mom connected him with the CEO through her business relationships, and he was not the foremost expert on software development, he was and is an expert on contracts and using the patent system to his advantage.
How the hell was he an expert on that stuff at such a young age
@@nothinleader - Responsible upper class parents that actually teach the business to their children, instead of some bullshit "let kids be kids" philosophy that denies them the ability to leverage the family's knowledge and resources to climb ahead in life? A lot of people are completely lost when they turn 18 because their parents never taught them about adult life or any kind of career-related knowledge. Bill Gates WAS taught that career-related knowledge, and made excellent use of it.
@@nothinleader A vast majority of major breakthroughs, innovations, and advancements, in history, came from relatively young men. They then spend the rest of their lives building upon that. Sure, an older guy, overseeing the young bucks doing the work, might get the glory, but the actual work and innovation generally comes from the youth who don't know "that thing can't be done".
Also, IBM was in a legal war w/ the DOJ so MS got a much better deal from them than otherwise would've been possible (i.e. IBM would've never licensed DOS let alone let MS sell it to competitors).
Give credit where credit is due. Sometimes the best of the best are not known because they fail to rise up for many reasons. Bill Gates was and has always been a software genius even in middle school.
"Bill knew more about software development than any one else at the time." Then proceeds to tell that Microsoft bought MS DOS from other company. Bill is genius but he is not the most intelligent person, he just happened to be a son of respected Mary Gates who happens to be connected to IBM's CEO John Opel.
yup, inside connections. Thanks Mom!! :)
"Then proceeds to tell that Microsoft bought MS DOS from other company." But that's not what he said. 3:16 He said that he (Gates) bought and existing OS and modified into what would become MS DOS. Also, he bought that OS to build upon as a time saving measure, not because he wasn't capable of doing it himself. I'm not some Bill Gates fanboy, but I think you're discrediting unfairly. At least in regards to this particular event.
@@1MinuteFlipDoc Make sure to thank a mom for her service today
@@The88Cheat I don't recall him saying he modified the DOS code he bought, I don't know why he would say that since he didn't change any of the code.
Tim Patterson wrote the first version of the program to work like the CP/M operating system but run on Intel 8086 processors, which the IBM PC used. Gates paid $75,000 for the code and then struck a licensing deal with IBM, which needed an operating system. He simply called it MS DOS. Bill basically invented drop-shipping.
Tim ended up working at Microsoft as part of the MS-DOS development team and later worked on MS Visual Basic.
No Tims were harmed in the writing of this post.
Except he also was writing computer programs from 13 y/o, had his first software company at 17, had 1590/1600 on the SAT and graduate MCL from Harvard. But yeah, “not the most intelligent person”.
Really cool to see how this channel has changed over the past few years! From Vlogs to high quality + informative documentaries... Cheers John!
sorry to break you bubble but this isn't informative. It's very biased actually. Bill Gates got to where he got because of nepotism. And he fucked over the original creator of DOS.
I agree and expect a huge amount of new sub's watching a lot of this new content over the next few year's and beyond . not even blew up yet but its coming
well.....money.
Yes, if you're a tech lover, in the world, you may know him. He is important to keep tech lovers informated
We have turned into the infants of war because of corruption, devision, education. Yeah sure we might have alot of weapons but u need an entire army to win a war. America isnt a war country. Russia is. China is. North korea is. We would rather make tik toks . That tv invention was the last rusty nail in america coffin after the world wars. Lazy consumers that took life easy and did drugs. Such a strong nation
I think people would be surprised how much of what they think the intelligence and military community is exists in the private sector.
Lies again? Special Forces Acura Mecca
That's America's superpower, the ability to mobilize the private sector to support the military. Other nations struggle with this.
@pa3465 In exchange the US got arguably smarter companies in the form of Palantir and Anduril.
Basically every conflict in the middle east south America was funded by and for the protection of large corporations. It's not like those wars made any of our lives easier
Since the inception of Dutch East India Company, nations lost their control over the army 🪖
More CEOs should dress up as military officers; that thumbnail went raw.
Military officers suggests they are hold accountable. Warlords seems to be a more accurate term
Agreed
@@elijahlivingston9477 dictator you mean.
Yeah, his Epstein army right? Because that’s what he truly believes in. A warrior for all the chomos out there. Somebody get Chris Hanson
Imagine Steve Jobs announcing the iPhone with a military outfit. That would be nuts 😂
in 2002 i was in tanks , we where looking at a new top of the line tank that just came in and it ran windows NT , i was mindblown , i didnt actually think microsoft where patching windows to be military i thought it was the tank developer
😂😂😂😂😂
did you tell Microsoft tanks for the software?
@@globaladdict 🤣
the fact that US military uses windows as their OS platform made me laugh in cramps...
US BSOD Force ... good luck with realiability ;DDDD
I will never understand war fetishes yk people die right scores of them for reasons other than their head of command said so
The us military can use more advanced controllers, and do for drones such as a reaper, but for smaller more conventional drones they found that soldiers are more comfortable using Xbox and ps3 controllers and find it easier to remember “combos” rather than a vast array of controls. According to a vender at a Association of the United Stares Army event.
Confirmed, soldiers are gamers
@@notsojharedtroll23I have heard that many soldiers like gaming during downtime.
@@notsojharedtroll23 thats not what he said......he said the controller is easier for them to understand.......which begs the question.....should ppl that are not smart enough to learn a different way to control something, should they really be in control of a multi-million dollar weapon?
X-Box put billions of dollars into making that controller feel and function near perfectly -- so why would you spend billions to make your own copy of what is already available ...? Because of the association with gaming ...? Silly .
Yeah they're already accustomed to the Xbox controllers so it makes sense
In 1981 I was working with GM Defense Products for the program office supporting engineers doing R&D for what was to become the Stryker light armoured vehicle shown several times in your video. According to IBM, I purchased the first PC/IBM 5150 built with Microsoft operating system through a bulk corporate buy I set up. I audited IBM’s in-service file for warranty purposes and we got about the first 40 before another purchaser got one and they became a hot item.
The fact that we get free videos from John on UA-cam is priceless. keeping the education and knowledge alive. 🙏🙏🙏
5:17 The USS Yorktown in this instances was not an Aircraft carrier, it was a Ticonderoga Class Guided Missile Cruiser. CG-48, which was taken out of service in 2004 and is currently being dismantled for scarp. The two Carrier Yorktown's haven't been in service since 1942 when USS Yorktown CV-5 was sunk after the Battle of Midway, 1970 when USS Yorktown CV-10 was decommissioned.
Thanks, was searching for WTF I was seeing at the moment
Dude this editing is another level 🔥🔥🔥
Lol, what about the content
It's over-edited. I escaped traditional TV because i can't stand the hyperactive, over-produced, over-edited ADHD spasmo programming.
Having lawyers as parents growing up really pays off in business later.
Conclusion: as long as the US military exists, so would Microsoft .
As long as businesses exists, so would Microsoft. Office products are everywhere on the enterprise level, Teams pretty much made Zoom obsolete
Pltr
Yes, its not a company its a deep state ownership from origin.
@@theoldgods8229 false 😂
Video payed by Russians
I just watched two of your videos; this one on Microsoft and the other on Bolt after UA-cam recommended them. I have to say I am really impressed with the quality of your videos, they are incredibly well structured, informative and engaging. It goes without saying I am now a subscriber, I have no doubt you'll reach and exceed a 1 million subscribers if you keep up the quality of your videos.
I wonder that would be the impact of recent aquicisions (IA) in this military enterprise.
Awesome work John, as usual.
When a big company has great power like a millitary techology,gathering information.They are almost unstoppable
4:39 - 4:59 they could have developed similar point and click environment for their linux system if they wanted. but that graphical GUI was always more heavy for resources. i think windows 11 now requires something like 8 gigabit of ram to work smoothly. and they could have custom-built their linux rock solid, in-house, never crashing. army could have owned their own licensing.
don't want to be a hostage to one company, you know...
thats not the reason. its the case of privatisation vs gov effort. gov expects better performance from the private sector and at the time there werent many in that sector who could supply the government with their requirements. Sure linux was around but someone would have to develop not only the GUI but the interface to many of their systems and keep it a secret, so they would have to break open source licenses in the process. This means that they have to privately handle updates to the OS instead of just updating the OS whenever there was a new release. In comparison windows NT wasnt just used for warships but other CPU architectures and was the precursor to the modern windows desktop and server OS we use today. You will find a windows NT 4 for sparc which is one of the systems used in the defence industry as sun not only developed sun solaris but hardware that dealt with number crunching stuff and had GPUs that rivalled the best of consumer AGP slot GPUs.
I have one of the old sun sparcs used in oil and gas, some of the components are modular in trays like the CPU and PSU. They were into ease of maintenance before it became a cool feature in desktop consumer cases too. Sun based their OS on unix and the longetivity of a company is important. IBM would only develop for their hardware and were a vendor who enjoyed locking others in. Sun didnt stick around long enough, granted their hardware was used in a lot of places and software too and had impressive server hardware that no x86 based manufacturer around ever made. 8 slot multi hundred core servers were around using sparc from sun long before today with hardware encryption part of the CPU long before AES went into intel/AMD. I remember drooling over sun servers long ago, with their $100k price tag. todays 96 corex2 multi hundred MB cache AMD servers cost $20k at least. not only that but sparc could handle up to 8 threads while intel/AMD SMT can only handle 2 threads.
This was unbelievably comprehensive. Excellent work.
I guess it goes without saying that the "Windows for Warships" edition includes the Minesweeper game. Got to keep the navy personnel sharp and on their toes 🙂
Daddy chill😅
John never fails to create content that's educating and exciting. Keep up the amazing work!
and don't forget to include...
a dismal failure, utterly lacking, and extremely cringe worthy too.
He left out anything one might consider important today, and was sure to include almost everything that was not.
----------------
Dude, for a second there, I thought you were about to propose.
---------------
If all this sounds mean to you, then find my other comments and you'll know exactly why.
(sort comments by date, with the newest being first, then start scrolling)
if you still stand by your assessment of this video after reading all that, (the comments left by me) I will withdraw this "mean" comment, issue an apology. (and I'll even eat my hat)
Bill was at least the smartest guy in the room at one point. Most CEOs can’t do any of the jobs in their companies but anyone could likely do theirs
Bill Gates was not the most knowledgeable person in software at that time. Gary Kildall and his company Digital Research were the foundation in personal computers. When IBM approached Bill, he told the to speak to Kildall. Bad timing and circumstance is why eventually Gates stepped up to IBM.
Hi Great Video, but i noticed a small mistake. You mentioned the USS Yorktown was an Aircraft Carrier. When infact the Yorktown in question (Yorktown CG-48) was a cruiser. I really dont blame you bc there are 4 Yorktowns and one was a carrier but i just wanted to put this right. Keep up the good work love your videos :)
you only noticed 1 mistake?
I love how he says Trump hates the Washington Post. I think the feeling was mutual.
This surprises me 0%. Microsoft launched a war on effective meetings with the introduction of PowerPoint.
This is an awesome video, John!! Very well done.
From what I understand MS projects with the US military yield zero to little result. The latest big contract they have with the US military seems to be providing some cloud computing service and that is also splitter between other big companies. They don't seem to have any technological edge other other companies. Even though MS might have a long history with the military, but I don't think that can make them anything close to a military empire either.
Exactly. It's funny how this video seems like it started out with a conclusion designed to go viral. But then presents facts that doesn't support that conclusion.
Especially funny, that a video about Microsoft has 5 minutes or so. Talking about The evolution of the US 'digital soldier programs' all the way from the 80's. And then at the end spends 10 seconds saying'Microsoft got involved, still not great'.
@soul0360 yeah that's cause it's propaganda
I worked with MS. I worked on the proposal that won the JEDI deal. MS has a considerable workforce just focusses on military. I can't disclose numbers, but the team that focuses on military apps and cloud is as big as any other super-big company.
@@martinchekuri yup, including the marketing budget to fund this vid, I'm sure
@@martinchekuriconsidering that Micro-Soft has diversified to being essentially an investment company, not just a software developer.
2:00 The old bearded guy is Bill's friend from High School. Definitely friends! Great content and your delivery is on point
Behind every great CEO is an engineer.
00:00 🎮 Researching Google's work with military drones, noticed Air Force officer using Xbox controller to fly a $60 million drone.
0:42 🛠 Microsoft, traditionally known for spreadsheets, Word Documents, becomes a key part of the US military's technology strategy.
4:00 🚀 Bill Gates transforms Microsoft, dominates the PC software market with MS-DOS, sets the stage for the company's military involvement.
7:23 📉 Microsoft loses dominance in the computing industry during the 2000s, struggles in consumer internet and mobile devices.
9:01 👓 Microsoft's focus on augmented reality, wins a $22 billion military contract for the Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS).
13:13 🌐 Microsoft's cloud computing journey with Azure, wins a $10 billion contract for the Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure (JEDI) project.
19:10 💻 Microsoft wins JEDI over Amazon, Trump's influence questioned, but Microsoft's longstanding ties with the military played a crucial role.
Billy's mom was on the board of IBM. She pushed the IBM board to take ms-dos, which in itself was not a microsoft product.
Crook upon crook...
She was on the board of United Way with the CEO of IBM.
If there's money to be made, it's fair play for every business.
Until you get enough lobbying power or direct influence to always get those sweet government contracts. Then the game starts being rigged.
"Greed, for lack of a better word, is good" 😂
@@scroopynooperz9051 a Gordon Gekko quote! Love it.
In developed countries the game is almost always rigged ... Big businesses kill or buy ALL successful small businesses.
In the end we will have just a handful of really really gigantic businesses.
Repent Israelites all praise to the most high YAHAWAH AND HIS SON YAHAWASHI🛸🤴🏽🦁
The so called black man, Latino, and Native Americans are the Israelites. Yahawah chosen people.
Deuteronomy 7:6 “For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth.”
Jeremiah 4:22 For my people is foolish, they have not known me; they are sottish children, and they have none understanding: they are wise to do evil, but to do good they have no knowledge.
Luke 13:5 I tell you, Nay: but except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.
The thubnail is pretty accurate his literal name is William Henry Gates III
Damn you leveled up on editing John
Whose John
@@internet_userr Idk, John Coogan perhaps
Military systems should be made based on demands from actual fighters, not imagined in offices of generals and corporate overlords.
Don't forget that Bill's mom was on IBM's board of directors when they bought MS DOS. No nepotism at all 😉
Great video! Well done! Thank you!
How do you have not a million plus subscribers with the original top quality content you put out 😭
Because a lot of us watch useless junk. This is loaded with data a lot of people cannt process
cuz hes not completely accurate and ppl see that.
I remember some of this but really appreciate your work putting it all together in one place. Good details and research relaying the info.
Well, the new Bing is definitely at the forefront of a new technological wave, and this time, google is lagging behind.
Lol what? Ive never heard anyone say "ill bing it" daniel
@@notapplicable4567 The new Bing isn't even out publicly though (unless im wrong and it is lol), so no one has a reason to get it. I personally have switched from Brave (well duckduckgo on brave) to (the developer version of) Bing, and I actually like the look of it, and the new Bing chat can actually be pretty useful. However I do not think we will ever go from "I'll Google it" to "Ill Bing It", I'm pretty sure Google has been immortalised in that regard.
@@notapplicable4567 bing chat
@@notapplicable4567 Bing has GPT
With just a little more information this could’ve been a great video. The military isn’t ran off of excel. It’s ran off of Outlook and Power Point. Microsoft’s a more diversified company over AWS and Google and now with Microsoft leading the way with AI Search (that wasn’t mentioned) Bing is getting a lot of traction. The Ivas and Hololens projects were large but never a contender with Azure, everything that Ivas and Hololens did was done on Azure. Also you kept bringing up Bill, while he was obviously amazing and drove the company to new heights. Satya put thrusters on Microsoft and put it into space with where he’s brought the company. This was a very lackluster watch
comparing aws (a part of amazon) to microsoft is not right, if you look at acquisitions its complicated but i would put amazon on top.
You are the worst kind of person lol
I feel like I'm not even that old but I've lived through most of this and this video just feels like someone reading a wikipedia page. Windows was the only choice for the military. They had a monopoly until the 00's. It makes no sense to be like "In the mid 90's the military had to choose an OS between Linux and Windows" when Linux in the 90's was absolute dog shit. It was really a question of whether they were going to dump billions building an OS specifically for the military at a time when most of the talent was at Microsoft. Even after losing the monopoly lawsuit MS still managed to be a giant in the tech industry. It's like watching a video on how much influence a monopoly gives without understanding that it is a monopoly.
The $22bn they got for IVAS are probably several orders of magnitude above of what they put into that project. And I guess they'll continue to milk the military for further funds.
To me IVAS looks like an upgraded version of the _Zielgerät 1229_ from 1944. Upgraded, because _Zielgerät 1229_ only had a (rather compact) 13kg backpack while IVAS features a (bulky) 20kg backpack.
Oh well, IVAS can run Doom. _Zielgerät 1229_ obviously can't.
If you wanna be successful, you must take responsibility for your emotions, not place the blame on others. In addition to making you feel more guilty about your faults, pointing the finger at others will only serve to increase your sense of personal accountability. There's always a risk in every investment, yet people still invest and succeed. You must look outward if you wanna be successful in life...
the market is profiting if you are using a good broker or account manager to help out with trades or provide signals
I'll recommend Expert Mrs. Pamela Weaver to you. She's the best I've seen. She trades my fx account and makes me good profits 📈weekly
Wow I know Mrs. Pamela and I have also been trading with her, She's such an amazing woman with good skills and keeps me happy all week knowing that I earn 15thousand extra income weekly trading with her.
yeah, she does, and in my opinion, it's a huge one and a chance for you to change your life with trading. I just bought my dream Mercedes from last week's profit. Thanks to her expertise.
Yeah you'll have to message her via Whatspp
I'd have expected some mentions of the experience Microsoft acquired developping stuff in and for China too.
Some real good content here. Very well structured.
What An Amazing Video , Great Job Mr. Coogan !!!
Somehow, I feel that you look a bit like the actor of SpiderMan :P.Thank you for the video. It's always fun to watch :)
"laid back philanthropist". the most dreaded kind if there was one.
the Altair reminds me of the clockworks that Look Mum No Computer puts together. i actually respect Bill Gates' hustle, pretty relentless p.s. like the soldiers i agree ms is easy to make fun of, but like an old car you can usually bang it with a wrench and get a result from it if you just try the same flawed procedure a second time
philanthropy and war go hand in hand, i guess.
Microsoft is looking great recently, more exciting than the other tech giants
very nice, now lets see paul alens computer
19:37 there is a world of difference between foul play and bantering about the commander in chief of a military until he revokes your contract. In the business world, it is not wise to speak ill to your clients. Had Bezos been smart about it, he would have simply waited until Trump was out of office to say anything ill advise. Yet with power comes ego, and with ego comes arrogance
The mother of Bill Gates was in the board of directors in IBM. Bill got his first big contract because of her.
NSA outsourced a ton of real heavy work to Microsoft.
The cloud is just somebody else's computer.
Sending critical systems to the cloud is moronically stupid: it creates a single point of failure begging to be exploited.
Based on the video title. I suspect that this video will blow up.
03:02 that's not true. Gary Kildall programmed the CP/M operating system and Bill stole code from it for MS DOS.
why does every video involving Microsoft need to include the whole history of the company...
PR image laundering
considering this is about tech and military, it makes sense.
Context!
His dad was a lawyer, specialised in business contracts. That helped.
though it's a bit eerie the thumbnail is hilarious, Bill Gates went tech businessman guru to "doctor" to "farmer" and now "general"
You missed eugenist.
Samsung is even bigger on the military side. It is an inevitable relationship between tech companies and the military.
You got me at ‘These days Gates is a laid back philanthropist’ 😂😂😂😂😂
Hahahaha
5:17 That wasn't the aircraft carrier USS Yorktown (CV-10) that was affected in 1998. USS Yorktown (CV-10), the WW2-famous Fighting Lady, had long been decommissioned by then, since 1970.
The USS Yorktown referred to in the incident was the Ticonderoga class cruiser CG-48. It served as the US Navy's testbed for the Smart Ship Program from 1996. The incident provided good lessons to the Navy and to the automation development community.
As of 2023 Microsoft has the contract for electronic security for Ukraine. They are also prepping to launch digital ID’s and digital currencies there aka social credit system.
Keep spreading the truth! They all need to show for they're misdeeds towards all of man everywhere.
@@MSF818Productions gov of canada website has a section for social credit. If they don’t censor my comments… u should search it up
10:11 the way you're talking about things that happened in the 90s while showing modern footage is kinda throwing me off
I don't think using Linux would have been different to Windows in the divide by zero error. That is not the operating system. It is the program that runs on top of the operating system - which is different to the operating system.
In early NT4, an application could crash the OS (the complete machine) by passing unexpected values into kernel routines. No range checking, no input validation, no sanity checks on the kernel level. It is entirely possible that a bug in an application program could cause blue screens when the program tries to recover or tries to exit gracefully. I remember that trying to unpack an incomplete RAR file with WinRAR would reliably cause a blue screen.
Heck, even receiving a TCP/IP packet from a non-Windows machine could crash NT4 under certain circumstances.
Many sanity checks were added to the kernel routines via service packs.
Of course, the real reason was that developers tried to cut corners. There sure was a lot of half-baked code in there - but it was also 25 years ago. Not sure how much similarly half-baked Linux had in the kernel at that time! All I remember was btrfs eating all my data.
actually the private company tech that shocked me the most was walking onto an AWACS 707 at an airshow and looking down a the workstations. I've seen those keyboards before ... Tandy TRS80.
Private military + Private Industry = Danger
This video could have been a youtube short and still conveyed the same Information
Imagine if some rich guy from Saudi Arabia or China bought Microsoft
philanthropy is proportional to guilt feeling of years and years of opportunism...
so how did he become in charge of what i inject into my family's body?
As with Microsoft, the Rockefellers gave him that position.
Microsoft Valuation on January 25th, 2024 - $3,000,000,000,000. Yes, folks. That's $3 trillion. Hate 'em or love 'em...
OHH OHH - I choose hate !
@@SabbaticusRex What's your net worth?
@@HullioGQ Why I am clearly _priceless_ , HullioGQ .
@@SabbaticusRex LOL.. Hate is emptiness, though! Celebrating abundance in self and others is priceless.
I lived in Palo Alto and Mountain View in the 90's. I knew a few people in tech. It was a routine thing for companies to come into existence and develop a product far enough that it became concern or interest to Microsoft, Sun, Oracle so Microsoft or one of the others would buy them out and either adapt it to Microsoft or kill it. That still goes n today except it includes Google, Amazon, Apple, etc.
How many promising technologies died back then which could have changed tings with a bit more development or an angel investor. Angel investors weren't always angels they would buy in and pitch it to Microsoft so Microsoft would buy it and do whatever they wanted with it resulting in a tidy profit. That still goes on today.
What solution would you provide?
This makes sooo much sense in why we are feeding the tech industry at schools over other trades now. Meaning they give more funding to IT over cnc electricians etc
IBM during WW2 made it possible for them to track all the people in the camps.
min 4:32 - Linux was not all that complete in 1991. Yes web servers were starting to pop up etc, but if you had more resources and wanted a stable system, you wend with SUN or BSD and others.Most were not free, BSD was open source. Linux is not UNIX, but rather unix like. It's great that people make videos, and of course we all learn somet8ing. But by spreading bad information we do a disservice to our own audience.
Liked before watching 😊
You forgot to mention that Gates mother was on the board of IBM when he was selected as the "best"choice.
Look up what his father did . .
Gaming now is military training.
They destroyed the gaming fun, the movies and streaming. A political tool.
Imagine getting killed by Clippy.
some of the first mass home computers were those such as Zx81 and Commodore. Most programs had to be manually written in, Zx81 only had tape deck. As commodore progressed even duel hard drives were available as third party products. Even the new models had an option to run as a earlier model to continue using older software. In general these machines were much more stable, less crashes. Now we are forced to buy newer models and throw away hundreds of dollers of old software because they won't work. It seems to be a industry alliance between Microsoft and software manufacturers to force us to keep spending money to be able to use our products. Maybe graphics weren't as good, but in general things like games were more playable. Now, my needs are simple, but even using programs such as Microsoft office is becoming unreliable, because Microsoft wants more money to upgrade. Systems like Unix are becoming more tempting
the good thing is if Terminators are based on MSFT tech, we are all safe.
sooner than later there will be a bug, a blue screen etc. and we will just be able to kick the damn thing in the head
Our military having to rely on Microsoft's products is very scary. Wonder if they have to reboot their system often.
Where's the competition? why do they expect a good product from a single company when given a handout?
He's does philanthropist capitalism, where in everything he "helps" with he comes out making millions off of it. He's not in this game to help us players that's for sure.
I wonder if the reason Microsoft bought activision was to train artificial intelligence using the playstyle of call of duty gamers.
Calling Bill Gates a philanthropist is like calling Dracula a blood donor.
Not only that he called the megalomaniac a "laid back philanthropist"!
He's no philanthropist, he's just returning stolen money way back when he suppressed competition and charged a premium for his products... It's sad that people in India appreciate him without knowing his backstory
Pushing the algorithm ❤️
You lost me on the word philanthropist. Calling him a scumbag would be a compliment. He engages in "philanthropy" as long as it is aligned with his goals, trying to repair his social damage on the way.
You didn't mention "Satya Nadella" even once. He turned around the company and made ot relevant.
$60M drone?? VW makes them in China for way less than that with free steak knives
holy shit open AI is a DoD project now.
Incredible video, great work
I love my Linux. Have been on Ubuntu since 2016, and I most definitely ain't going back to Windows!
X2 long life to linux
IBM wanted CP/M, not DOS. In the end the deal for CP/M did not happen as the founder had no interest in the business. This left IBM with only one choice.
Also, Bill Gates' mother knew some of the IBM execs, so he had personal connections that helped sell an OS to IBM.
How many people do you think knew those execs?! 😂😂😂 ... Knowing them has some value, but know what to do with the access is another thing altogether.
They once had worker backlash about the hololens for a helmet mounted version of that display.
This was very well done. Thanks.
(missing the thumbnail at the end)
Crimea IS, and will always BE - UKRAINE!! And... BAKHMUT STANDS!
Slava Ukraini. Heroyam Slava!
@Dan Lyons Sounds like your copium has worn off Ivan. Just because a language is spoken outside of a country does not make it 'that country'! and those who don't want to stay as Ukrainians - can leave.
Ukraine voted to leave the ussr - and russia erroneously thought they could just replace the ussr - it was putlins dream - to rebuild his former empire. He's stated he wants to rebuild that once-mighty empire. But - the entire rest of the world (minus belaras and north korea, syria and china) have said 'that's not happening vlad'.
And Ukraine DID vote to split from that empire - you're right there. And there is NO WAY they are going to allow putin to try and rape and pillage his way to keep a seized land he INVADED. Nice try Ivan - up your copium and see if it kicks in.
Crimea IS, and will always BE - UKRAINE!! And... BAKHMUT STANDS!
Slava Ukraini. Heroyam Slava!
@Dan Lyons better get back toyour favorite - tucker carlson - ivan - you're missing screen time.
@Dan Lyons you assume the rest of the world is forced into the same CNN/Fox bubble-world
No Banderites.
I wonder if I should click away after seeing that "MILITARY" is misspelled as "MILLITARY" basically every time.
Going to gloss over how bill gates mom helped with that IBM contract. bill didn’t even have an operating system when he won the contract….how did he get the contract without a product. The rich help the rich.