The Falcon 50: FULL REVIEW

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @javacup912
    @javacup912 2 дні тому +1

    Great video. I worked on both the 50 and the original 900, and the EX. The EX of course had a better avionics suite, and updated engines. Never got a straight answer on the single T/R, other than the tail is farther aft than the Falcon 20/200, so the left and right reversers were omitted on this trijet, and 900s, and to this day of 6x,7X and 8X. Obviously, landing roll out performance took a minor penalty, but acceptable. Super great airplanes.
    As for the video, saying Falcon 50 every minute, is redundant. it's on the video title, and mentioning it once is enough, as only aviation enthusiast will watch this video, in particular Dassault/Falccon fleet fans.

  • @massmike11
    @massmike11 7 місяців тому +2

    That third engine must add a huge price jump when it comes time to overhaul the engines

    • @seriouslystewarts3537
      @seriouslystewarts3537 6 місяців тому +1

      Its one of the few mid size Jets that can fly from NYC to London! A lot cheaper to maintain then a mini airliner like the GIV 💯 (it’s all tax write off if jet registered under LLC and USED 50/50 for business) 🙏🏾

    • @BirdDog.
      @BirdDog. Місяць тому +1

      @@seriouslystewarts3537but it can’t make it back to New York. Maybe ex with winglets

    • @seriouslystewarts3537
      @seriouslystewarts3537 Місяць тому

      @@BirdDog. True …I like the G550 anyways 😅….You take care …

  • @50falcon
    @50falcon 7 місяців тому

    Try 3700 pounds of thrust
    I wish it was 4500!

  • @Pajtim2023
    @Pajtim2023 3 місяці тому +1

    Falcon ex is better