Prospective v Retrospective Analysis - NEC3

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 11

  • @IMGHDLGAP
    @IMGHDLGAP 7 років тому +1

    Could not be explained better, thank you

  • @Pgonhe7
    @Pgonhe7 4 роки тому +1

    Very Good & Practical Tips~~! Many Thanks~!

  • @alanpierce7971
    @alanpierce7971 10 років тому +2

    Excellent video, thanks Ewan!

  • @shirazmalik9579
    @shirazmalik9579 6 років тому +1

    awesomely explained..Respect for you effort.

  • @mdgrubio
    @mdgrubio 3 роки тому

    Thanks and subs!

  • @muhamedessawy3662
    @muhamedessawy3662 3 роки тому

    Many thanks kindly provide me how to make timeimpact analysis report and p6

  • @philipleung3108
    @philipleung3108 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks

  • @swapna3rao
    @swapna3rao 8 років тому +1

    Excellent

  • @fliescottage
    @fliescottage 5 років тому +1

    Many thanks. I want to ask who determines which approach to be used?

    • @ewenmaclean7
      @ewenmaclean7  4 роки тому

      There is no set person who determines the approach, but a good expert should be able to advise on a particular case. Indeed, there are various factors that can influence the approach or choice of methodology. These can include, inter alia, any requirements in the Contract; the records available; the timing of the analysis, i.e. during the currency of the project or post project; and the complexity of the matter etc. However, post project, my experience is that courts or arbitration tribunals prefer retrospective analyses where it is known what actually happened. To this extent, the as-planned versus as-built windows analysis has proven to be reliable in such forums.