- 34
- 50 904
Ewen Maclean
Приєднався 15 лип 2014
The Future of Delay?
Ewen Maclean discusses the impact of technology in the construction industry and in presenting expert evidence to Tribunals.
"Construction delay experts will need to upskill and transform into visual communication experts bringing data to life."
"Construction delay experts will need to upskill and transform into visual communication experts bringing data to life."
Переглядів: 537
Відео
NEC - 30. What happens when the PM doesn't reply properly either to a notification or a quota
Переглядів 4527 років тому
There are a number of stages that a compensation event needs to pass through before it becomes implemented under the contract. Is it possible for the Project Manager to de-rail the process by refusing to engage in it? If there is a lack of engagement what happens ideally and practically?
NEC - 29. Do the 63 7 assumptions work in practice?
Переглядів 4827 років тому
Clause 63.7 allows the Project Manager to give some working assumptions to the contractor where there is not enough detail available for a proper quotation for a compensation event. Are assumptions often given and if they are, do they help the contractor or just cover the Project Manager?
NEC - 28. Does clause 63 1 apply to assessing time as well as money and what are the consequences
Переглядів 6197 років тому
Clause 63.1 provides a dividing line between using the cost incurred and using a forecast of cost plus risk for future operations. Given that the compensation event process deals with all aspects of an event in one go does the dividing line established in 63.1 apply equally to delay caused by the event or is there some other mechanism that has to be used? If some other mechanism applies, does t...
NEC - 27. Compensation events tie together the consequences of events. Does that really work?
Переглядів 2437 років тому
The theory behind compensation events in the NEC is to take an event and deal with all of its consequences. Does that produce a better result or just a more complicated process? Is it really any different to other contacts in any event?
NEC - 26. How do the time bars in 61.3 operate? Do they sit well with 10.1 (mutual trust etc)?
Переглядів 5697 років тому
Clause 61.3 provides that, for certain compensation events, if the contractor does not notify them within 8 weeks of becoming aware of them it will lose the right to a change in the total of the prices and a revision to the completion date. This does not sound much like mutual trust and cooperation does it? Is it appropriate to have time bars in this contract and do they work?
NEC - 25. Which compensation events are most common and which are incorrectly claimed most often?
Переглядів 1,1 тис.7 років тому
The compensation event mechanism is intended to be a sole remedy under the contract. Therefore, the list of what can be a compensation event has to be all encompassing. Despite that breadth, are there trends for which ones are most common and are there particular events which rarely seemed to be claimed properly?
NEC - 22. Float and time risk allowance are the same aren't they?
Переглядів 2,3 тис.7 років тому
Both time risk allowance and float are provided within the requirements for the content of an NEC programme. What are the practical and programming differences between the two? How do you make sure you show them and use them effectively?
NEC - 24. Are the programmes requirements of NEC too complicated?
Переглядів 2197 років тому
Clause 31.2 contains a long list of what must be included within a compliant programme, as a minimum; and 32.1 adds to that for each update. Is this overly burdensome, particularly if the project is a relatively simple one?
NEC - 23. Is the programme I submitted with a CE a revised programme under 32.2?
Переглядів 4297 років тому
The contract requires that any compensation event that is said to have an impact on planned Completion must be supported by the alterations needed to the Accepted Programme (62.2). Does that mean a new programme has to be submitted and if it does is that then the new Accepted Programme?
NEC - 21. Is there an implied acceptance of programmes?
Переглядів 2117 років тому
Given how central the programme is to the NEC it must be important that everyone works to the same, up to date version of it. What happens then if a contractor submits a programme and hears nothing back? Is it accepted or not and does it make any difference?
NEC - 19. How much detail should the Programme include?
Переглядів 4367 років тому
For long and complex projects the programme can itself be complicated. How much information should anyone reasonably expect to see on a programme and does the distance away from “time now” matter? If activities of work are further in the future is it acceptable to provide less detail?
NEC - 20. Is an NEC programme just a bar chart?
Переглядів 2307 років тому
The programme is central to most processes under the NEC but what exactly is the programme? If it is not just a bar chart what exactly is it or what could it include?
NEC - 17 How do I recover my subcontractors overheads
Переглядів 3887 років тому
The NEC allows recovery of “Defined Cost” plus fee with each contract having a slightly different approach to the calculation of Defined Cost. How do you make sure that those definitions tie up with the supply chain so that no one is recovering extra percentage uplifts and therefore extra profit but equally no one is exposing themselves to risk of the unknown in pricing someone else’s fee.
NEC - 16 Why do Options C D and E allow the PM to disallow costs
Переглядів 1,6 тис.7 років тому
NEC - 16 Why do Options C D and E allow the PM to disallow costs
NEC - 18 Does the payment mechanism under NEC work efficiently
Переглядів 7327 років тому
Most contracts assume the contractor will lead the payment application cycle with the certifier reviewing the application. Why is the NEC different in this regard in having the process led by the PM? Does that actually happen in practice and is the distinction important in any event?
NEC - 15. The Schedule of Cost Components is very complicated, why not just use rates?
Переглядів 2,7 тис.7 років тому
NEC - 15. The Schedule of Cost Components is very complicated, why not just use rates?
NEC - 14. Why are options B and D not used much?
Переглядів 2,3 тис.7 років тому
NEC - 14. Why are options B and D not used much?
NEC - 13. Is there a Final Account mechanism under the NEC?
Переглядів 1,1 тис.7 років тому
NEC - 13. Is there a Final Account mechanism under the NEC?
NEC - 12. Should early warnings be contractual obligations?
Переглядів 6177 років тому
NEC - 12. Should early warnings be contractual obligations?
NEC - 10. Is there really a difference between “approved” and “accepted”?
Переглядів 7717 років тому
NEC - 10. Is there really a difference between “approved” and “accepted”?
NEC - 11. Who controls a risk reduction meeting?
Переглядів 9147 років тому
NEC - 11. Who controls a risk reduction meeting?
NEC - 8. Provide the Works seems like a simple concept, is it?
Переглядів 2367 років тому
NEC - 8. Provide the Works seems like a simple concept, is it?
NEC - 7. Do clauses 13.1 and 13.7 really work effectively?
Переглядів 2657 років тому
NEC - 7. Do clauses 13.1 and 13.7 really work effectively?
NEC - 9. The PM instructs the removal of an employee who bears the risk?
Переглядів 3467 років тому
NEC - 9. The PM instructs the removal of an employee who bears the risk?
NEC - 5. Does NEC3 have too much process and procedure?
Переглядів 2438 років тому
NEC - 5. Does NEC3 have too much process and procedure?
NEC - 6. What would improve NEC3 in practice?
Переглядів 2188 років тому
NEC - 6. What would improve NEC3 in practice?
NEC - 4. The impact of adjudication on the development of NEC3?
Переглядів 3298 років тому
NEC - 4. The impact of adjudication on the development of NEC3?
NEC - 3. Do the NEC and Construction have common values?
Переглядів 2348 років тому
NEC - 3. Do the NEC and Construction have common values?
I wish the camera angle was chosen better. Focus should have been on the screen.
I take the point @mammadfy. The footage was provided by the organiser and was just general coverage that I had no control over.
Very informative
Hi Ewen, this was an absolute delight, looking forward to see more content on Delay Analysis as well.
Thanks Vedant, most kind.
Many thanks kindly provide me how to make timeimpact analysis report and p6
Thanks and subs!
the questions were inaudible
Hi Mr. Ewen, I would like to get in contact with you regarding research in delay analysis and artificial intelligence. my email Mostafakanza@ aucegypt .edu
Hi Mr. Ewen, I would like to get in contact with you regarding research in delay analysis and artificial intelligence. my email Mostafakanza@ aucegypt .edu
Excellent presentation. Thanks
Thank you.
I suggest that you don't read what's on the slides. That way, you'll have more time to add to the existing script
Good Presentation easy to understand Thankyou Mr. Ewen
How business plan is initiated, study analysis done, design bisis & coping paper fixed and finaly propject proposals process caried during project life cycle.
Please make a videos on Front End Loading prior to execution stage.
Please upload more videos
Very Good & Practical Contents~!!
Very Good & Practical Tips~~! Many Thanks~!
Thanks
Many thanks. I want to ask who determines which approach to be used?
There is no set person who determines the approach, but a good expert should be able to advise on a particular case. Indeed, there are various factors that can influence the approach or choice of methodology. These can include, inter alia, any requirements in the Contract; the records available; the timing of the analysis, i.e. during the currency of the project or post project; and the complexity of the matter etc. However, post project, my experience is that courts or arbitration tribunals prefer retrospective analyses where it is known what actually happened. To this extent, the as-planned versus as-built windows analysis has proven to be reliable in such forums.
awesomely explained..Respect for you effort.
Excellent presentation Ewen. Clear concise and practical
Thank you Paul, your kind words are appreciated.
nice stuff
How about attaching a link to the slide deck, since the video doesn't show it and you're blind to what the speaker is referring?
Numerous people have been in contact with me to request a copy of the slides that accompany my presentation on Forensic Delay Analysis - How to Find the Truth? Therefore I posted them in my Profile Summary for any others who may also wish to have a copy. The new LinkedIn layout means you have to 'show more' of my summary to see the media but: www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/key/hEvOW5wV1PQQTw
Perfect, thank you!
Could not be explained better, thank you
Excellent
Excellent video, thanks Ewan!