Original Sin

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 лют 2020
  • Where does Original Sin appear in scripture and how does that connect with Jesus as the New Adam?
    Does St. Paul speak of original sin and the effect/entry of death into the human condition? And, how does his connection with Jesus as the new Adam shed light on the way Original Sin operates in light of how Jesus' redemption operates?
    To learn more about this reading from Romans, what Original Sin is (and is not), and the connections between the readings at Mass on the 1st Sunday of Lent, subscribe today to The Mass Readings Explained:
    catholicproductions.com/pages...
    For more Bible studies by Dr. Pitre, visit:
    catholicproductions.com/colle...
    Commons Images used:
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 366

  • @esther.kamweru
    @esther.kamweru 4 роки тому +18

    Thank you Dr Pitre. Loving this from Kenya, East Africa

  • @okonomiyaki3169
    @okonomiyaki3169 4 роки тому +24

    I always find it interesting and even fun to think about these parallels in Old and New Testaments. Thank you. :)

    • @timothyseals3791
      @timothyseals3791 2 роки тому

      The doctrine of original sin is not biblical. This is a false man made doctrine.

    • @judeugwu4987
      @judeugwu4987 10 місяців тому

      @@timothyseals3791no it’s not. He literally pulled up the verse that supports original sin 🤦🏾‍♂️

    • @timothyseals3791
      @timothyseals3791 10 місяців тому

      @judeugwu4987 No bible verse supports original sin. If you care to discuss it, then let me know, and we can set up a call.

    • @timothyseals3791
      @timothyseals3791 10 місяців тому

      @@judeugwu4987 No bible verse supports original sin. If you care to discuss it, then let me know, and we can set up a call.

  • @adelaidawallaert287
    @adelaidawallaert287 4 роки тому +2

    Thanks Dr Brant Pitre ! God bless you 🙏

  • @psdesign1
    @psdesign1 4 роки тому +1

    thank you Dr. Pitre.

  • @artiecullen2511
    @artiecullen2511 2 роки тому +1

    Thank You Brother Brant 🕊 Love how you brake down the Bible 🙌🎼🙏 Amen 🙏

  • @dawithileyesus448
    @dawithileyesus448 Рік тому

    Thank you

  • @paulmiller3469
    @paulmiller3469 4 роки тому +4

    Thanks, Dr. Pitre.

    • @paulmiller3469
      @paulmiller3469 4 роки тому

      @Patrick Montgomery ...in your opinion, which I don't accept.

    • @paulmiller3469
      @paulmiller3469 4 роки тому

      @Patrick Montgomery ...in your opinion, which I don't accept. Not to be overly harsh, but I would guess your interpretive skills are on par with your ability to post a grammatically correct statement.

    • @paulmiller3469
      @paulmiller3469 4 роки тому

      @Patrick Montgomery Bless you, Patrick.

    • @truthbetold8610
      @truthbetold8610 4 роки тому

      Dr Pitre really doesn't know anything but Catholic Doctrine and Tradition which are severely lacking truth.

  • @magaman6353
    @magaman6353 4 роки тому +10

    Most university English literature programs include Milton's "Paradise Lost," which deals with the fall of Adam and Eve. Yet I've never seen one that included the "rest of the story" by Milton, "Paradise Regained."

    • @bard5865
      @bard5865 4 роки тому

      For God's sake, it's Dante's Inferno and Paradisio all over again!

  • @josephjude1290
    @josephjude1290 4 роки тому +6

    He is always great to listen to; does he have any upcoming books coming out in the future?

  • @alan-muscat
    @alan-muscat Рік тому

    Simply brilliant.

  • @paulhandsome1691
    @paulhandsome1691 4 роки тому +10

    Jesus is New Adam and He's Body and Blood is Fruit of Eternal Life

    • @vernonbrowne6127
      @vernonbrowne6127 4 роки тому +1

      And Mary, is the new Eve.

    • @paulhandsome1691
      @paulhandsome1691 4 роки тому +1

      Yes Vernon Browne and Mother Mary is New Eve

    • @timothyseals3791
      @timothyseals3791 2 роки тому

      The original sin doctrine is not biblical and is leading people to hell.

    • @EnavSounds
      @EnavSounds 8 днів тому

      From my understanding the church is the new Eve.

  • @jeffreysharp8526
    @jeffreysharp8526 Рік тому

    Thank you, Dr. Picture for your concise explanation on the topic of justification. Having wrestled with Luther's concept, it left one with the impression that we must struggle to win the Divine favor knowing that it will never be accomplished. Very pessimistic. If he was antisocial, that fact certainly explains most of his actions, writing & thought. However, Paul tells us the opposite & encourages us to take on the mantle of Christ. Your explanations certainly clears up much confusion. PAX

  • @ChristineCorey
    @ChristineCorey 4 роки тому +1

    So smart!!!

  • @nathanngumi8467
    @nathanngumi8467 4 роки тому +3

    Very enlightening, thanks.
    Jesus as the new Adam undid the faults of the old Adam.

    • @ptgannon1
      @ptgannon1 4 роки тому

      Why did the old Adam have faults? How does something that is "all-good" produce something that has faults? Didn't God know what would happen? I thought he was all-knowing... And why did Jesus wait so bloody long to do something about it?
      First God let people sin without telling them what they were doing that was ticking him off so much that he drowned them all, then for the few survivors, instead of taking care of Original Sin at that time, he let it continue, but again failed to tell them what it was they were doing that was ticking him off, until finally we get the mythical story of Moses and the Exodus... He finally tells folks what they are doing that ticks him off, but it doesn't change much. He's still sending them to Sheol where they are dead. In those days he punished people during their lives or those of their offspring to the 3rd and 4th generation, but left them alone when they died and went to Sheol.
      Finally, over a thousand years later he decides to do something about all this by sacrificing himself to himself, but only offering salvation to those who believe this fanciful story. Now, instead of simply being dead in Sheol, we are to be tortured for eternity in flames for eternity, for failing to believe the fanciful story that is presented to us with no compelling objective evidence. How is it that our situation has been improved?

    • @ptgannon1
      @ptgannon1 4 роки тому

      @Patrick Montgomery prove I'm wrong. Prove the prior existence of Adam. Prove the existence of your God, or at a minimum provide just a shred of compelling objective evidence. If God's plan is "Secret" why do you know about it? Prove the existence of Moses and provide evidence for the Exodus as described in the bible.
      When you are able to achieve this, go to Stockholm to pick up your Nobel Prize. When you call someone "wrong" you had better be prepared to back it up, otherwise you can be dismissed out of hand... Which is what I'm doing to you! Bye bye. And learn some grammar and sentence structure if you want to be taken seriously.

    • @ptgannon1
      @ptgannon1 4 роки тому

      @Patrick Montgomery like I said - prove I'm wrong. Prove the existence of Adam and God, Moses and the Exodus. I don't even demand proof - good objective evidence will more than suffice, but there is none, is there?
      Goodbye. You are uninteresting since you can't respond to the topic.

    • @truthbetold8610
      @truthbetold8610 4 роки тому

      @@ptgannon1 It's called FREE WILL,. the ability to make up your own mind on a course of action, Adam and Eve obviously screwed up.

    • @ptgannon1
      @ptgannon1 4 роки тому

      @@truthbetold8610 well, first - there was no Adam and Eve. Evolution and DNA evidence make it pretty clear that we evolved from a pool of early ancestors and not a single breeding couple. However, the mythical story does not demonstrate free will. First, the kids could not know that disobedience was wrong until AFTER they ate of the fruit of knowledge of good and evil. Until one has "knowledge" of good and evil, how can one have the free will to choose between the two? God punished them because the talking snake shamed him. He said they would die on the day they ate of the fruit - but the snake said otherwise and the snake told the truth. The snake told them that God didn't want them to eat of the fruit because then the humans would know good and evil like the gods. Gen 3:22 confirms that again the snake was right, and told the truth. Gen 3:22 is a warning to us that evil gods lie in the pages ahead...
      If you read the entire bible, you will find very little support for free will. Yahweh is constantly hardening hearts, sending good or sending evil, controlling events, controlling humans.. there's so little free will in the bible, that the Sadducee's didn't even believe in free will, and the Pharisees believed it was limited. Most denominations of Christianity (aside from Calvinism), believe in free will, otherwise that makes God a heck of a monster, sending people to eternal torment... but if he knows all things, then we don't have free will. If God knows what is going to happen, then nothing we do can change that. If we could change the outcome by praying or whatever, that would mean God was not all-knowing. If God knows all things, he can't even change his own mind, otherwise it would mean he didn't know all things.
      Whether humans actually have some degree of free will, or whether the universe is deterministic, is yet to be determined.

  • @heruyghebremeskel2575
    @heruyghebremeskel2575 4 роки тому

    Very true

    • @timothyseals3791
      @timothyseals3791 2 роки тому +1

      The doctrine of original sin is not biblical. This is a false man made doctrine.

  • @Quis_ut_Deus
    @Quis_ut_Deus 3 роки тому

    I don't really understand Paul when he says that "[13]Sin already existed in the world before there was any law, even though sin is not reckoned when there is no law."
    Was the sin of Sodom in the time of Lot not reckoned? Or does he mean it was suspended?
    And while he says that the sin of Adam causes death to spread through the whole human race because everyone has sinned (because the sin of Adam make sin came into the world through him and through sin death) it is however clear that the work of Jesus didn't change the consequence of the original sin for the new births of the humanity under the New Alliance but that the justification Paul speaks of comes through faith in the work of Christ and not directly as a consequence of this work like it was for the original sin. So that overwhelming God' grace only reveals itself through faith in the work and not by inherently changing the human condition who is still under the original sin.
    This state of things brings forward a kind of principle of merit but only based on a sincere openness to receive god's grace and faith in Spirit and in Truth.

  • @thomism1016
    @thomism1016 4 роки тому

    Awesome as always!!! Can anyone please help me out with the biblical exegesis of this verse which I’ve always had trouble with and he PAINFULLY skipped 🤓:
    Romans 5:13
    sin indeed was in the world before the law was given, but sin is not counted where there is no law.

    • @zaidhm5687
      @zaidhm5687 4 роки тому

      it seems like youre taking the verse out of context. anyways, sin means breaking the law, so if theres no law theres no sin. original sin, however, is because adam (our ancestor) sinned so his nature became corrupt and died. and thats what we inherited, death and corruption.

    • @awutelizabeth262
      @awutelizabeth262 2 роки тому

      Thank you so much Dr. Pitre. May the good Lord bless you

  • @hong-lin
    @hong-lin Рік тому

    Do angels have original sin? If there is no original sin, how can an angel fall into a devil for no reason? For more details, please watch the sermon of the Light of Wisdom Church, welcome everyone to study and discuss together. Video “The Original Sin and Samsara reincarnation | I Am the way, the truth and the life 03 #biblequote”If you think it makes sense, we must not only believe it ourselves, but also spread it to more people. Evangelism is not only the job of pastors, but also the responsibility of every believer. This is also the aspect that the Lord values most when ascending to the kingdom of heaven.

  • @instrumentengineer5823
    @instrumentengineer5823 2 роки тому

    And their Lord called to them(ADAM & EVE a.s.), "Did I Not Forbid you from that tree and tell you that SATAN IS to you a CLEAR ENEMY?"
    They replied, “Our Lord! We HAVE WRONGED OURSELVES. If You do not FORGIVE US and have Mercy on us, we will certainly be LOSERS.” 7.22-23
    "So ALLAH ACCEPTED HIS REPENTANCE. Surely HE is the Accepter of Repentance, MOST MERCIFUL"
    Qur'an Majeed 2.37
    "CHILD WILL NOT SHARE the GUILT OF the PARENT, nor will the parent share the guilt of the child. The righteousness of the righteous will be credited to them, and the WICKEDNESS OF the WICKED WILL BE CHARGED AGAINST THEM." Ezikel 18.20

  • @myronromero7071
    @myronromero7071 4 роки тому +1

    Two questions. First are you speaking to a camera or person? And do you have any online courses? A fellow Tiger fan wants to know

    • @myronromero7071
      @myronromero7071 4 роки тому +2

      What are you babbling about. I asked two simple questions, which by the way wasn’t directed to you. It was directed to Dr. Pitre

    • @myronromero7071
      @myronromero7071 4 роки тому +2

      So if I have a question for Dr. Pitre I can’t ask it under the very video he puts out? So what’s the point of a comment section under video

    • @jongricafort4
      @jongricafort4 4 роки тому +2

      @@myronromero7071
      Charity....because we are now living in the Age of Confusions...One must be charitable to correct another and hoping and praying that all other who are deceive will come to the knowledge of Truth.
      One soul enlighten is a cause of celebration in Heaven.
      The Catholic Church has the Fullness of Truth, but other Christian denominations also has some element of Truth, even other faith who have goodwill are all People of God too, because we have only One Maker.
      Christian must follow St.Paul who recognized and submit to the authority of Peter, James & John. Read Galtains2:8-10

    • @jongricafort4
      @jongricafort4 4 роки тому +1

      @Patrick Montgomery
      ua-cam.com/video/p5TGfisOKMM/v-deo.html

    • @myronromero7071
      @myronromero7071 4 роки тому +1

      I wasn’t trying
      To make a Mountian out of a molehill you were the one who’s chain got pulled for some reason. I simply asked a question; if this was not the place to ask them simply say so do step up and show your intelligence and say my question was nonsense !!!!!!

  • @cuauhtemocmorisco3493
    @cuauhtemocmorisco3493 4 роки тому +1

    So when Christ was resurrected and went up to the sky while the Apostle's were witnesses in essence Christ defeated Death and Sin. Which could be Spiritual and physical death but as well as sin since he never sinned and was the perfect sacrifice to pay for all of our sins? Then the only thing left to do is for us to follow Christ yet we still sin when sin is no more because Christ defeated it..so how should we carry ourselves? At what point do we stop fighting against each other and instead start helping each other? I still can't believe God is so great and perfect that he'd want someone like me a wretched sinner who instead of doing good does bad and in doing so is always going back to him because fear is in me and my God is just to punish me yet I believe Christ died for me so I try to stop sinning but it is so difficult not to sin. If Christ gave his life for us on the cross then shouldn't we as well give our life on the cross for others? Meaning we should serve others including our enemies with a humble heart and many graces?

    • @agrikantus9422
      @agrikantus9422 4 роки тому +3

      In my opinion , Salvation is a process, we need to humble ourselves, everyday we receive test from God and in the test he shows us where we're failing so we confess our sin, we realize our sin and we get in the process of purification, that's why we have to die every day ( to deny the ego ).
      Everyday is a blessing, where we can improve on ourselves, not alone but guided by the Holy Spirit.
      We don't just accept Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour, we also have to fallow His Commandments.
      Find a Traditional Catholic Church and find a good priest wich has the patient, ask him to help understand.
      And don't rush in judgement, but seek transformation.
      I'm a newcomer to Catholicism ( traditional ) and I'm not Catholic yet but I'm transforming slowly everyday.

    • @jongricafort4
      @jongricafort4 4 роки тому +2

      Blue Dreams
      your last sentences is correct.... "If Christ gave his life for us on the cross then shouldn't we as well give our life on the cross for others?"
      This is called "Way of the Cross" and this is the only way for us to enter God's Kingdom, there's no other way.
      Adam in the garden does not have a cross, Adam & Eve live in a paradise where there's no suffering, it is a land free of the Cross.
      Adam must grow in "Wisdom" in the garden like Jesus thru a life of "Obedience in order to reach theosis or divinization.
      Jesus did it for 18 years, a life of obedience to Joseph & Mary and a life of obedience to God's Will.
      Adam had only to follow God's Will and no one else...Adam failed and did not grow in Wisdom, while Jesus grew in Wisdom.
      Jesus came to show us the way to Heaven, and it is called the "Way of the Cross"..."obedience thru & despite of sufferings even unto death". Because only thru death that we can enter into a new life an eternal life..death on Cross..We must imitate and become like Jesus...as St.Paul said "it is no longer I who lives but Jesus".

    • @jongricafort4
      @jongricafort4 4 роки тому +1

      @Patrick Montgomery
      You need a spiritual mother to be born again. DO NOT BE ORPHAN as Jesus had promised us a Comforter, Consoler and another Advocate. She is our Mother in the order of grace. The chosen Woman is not only the Mother of Jesus the Redeemer but also the Mother of all the Redeemed.
      Read John19:27

    • @eddixxon
      @eddixxon 4 роки тому

      @Patrick Montgomery
      Don't be naive, Jimmy Swaggart, an evangelical pastor, a self proclamied born again chistian, well known preacher fell into the whore trap twice, all the while actively doing ministry work.
      Are yoi saying you haven't sinned since being born again?
      I think you have an egoistic, self righteous problem!

    • @truthbetold8610
      @truthbetold8610 4 роки тому +1

      @@jongricafort4 Jesus did what for 18 years?

  • @gcdiver
    @gcdiver 4 роки тому

    Dr Pitre, since Eve was the first to eat of the forbidden fruit, why wouldn't she be the one identified as bringing death into the world versus Adam?

    • @ptgannon1
      @ptgannon1 4 роки тому

      Because women were chattel - property.

    • @truthbetold8610
      @truthbetold8610 4 роки тому

      Because life force is in the man's sperm, not the woman's egg. If Adam had not partaken of the fruit God could have created a different woman for him and most likely Eve would die.
      However God would have handled it , mankind would have not been imperfect since Adam would have not sinned.

    • @ptgannon1
      @ptgannon1 4 роки тому

      @@truthbetold8610 sorry, but there is no such thing as a "life force." Life is a process, like the flame on a candle. Blow out the candle, where does the flame go? Nowhere. The process of rapid oxidation simply stops. Same with life. When the process stops, the life ends.
      However you are correct that the ancients believed there was a life force, and they believed that the woman merely carried the man's seed, so they believed original sin passed from the man, through the process of sexual intercourse (which helps explain why the Church is so obsessed with sex.
      When they learned in the 1800's that women contribute half the genetic material, they had to change the status of Mary, because she would have gotten original sin from her parents who did the naughty deed, and would have passed it to Jesus. The Church decided in 1854, with no good biblical support, that Mary had been born without original sin.
      Of course, if God could remove or prevent original sin in Mary, he can remove or prevent it in all of us - but apparently he prefers the Rube Goldberg convolution of impregnating a young woman with himself so he could be born as himself, so he could sacrifice himself to himself, to remove a condition he placed on us in the first place, and which he was able to remove or prevent for Mary with a wink and a nod.
      It's all incredibly unbelievable, and for failing to believe this fanciful tale, the Church tells us we will burn forever.

    • @truthbetold8610
      @truthbetold8610 4 роки тому

      @@ptgannon1 No such thing as a life force? Science admits the life is in the sperm, not the egg. Mary did have the effect of the original sin like all humans and that is imperfection. Do you think God is incapable of producing Jesus as a perfect, sinless human from a woman who is a sinner like everyone else? If so, you have a narrow view of the one who is all powerful.
      As for burning forever, you can forget that lie, there is no such thing as fiery hell, I don't care what the Church says and what incorrect translations they put in their Bible, it simply isn't true.

    • @ptgannon1
      @ptgannon1 4 роки тому

      @@truthbetold8610 can you provide a link to a source that says science admits life is in the sperm, not the egg? This source will need to define what it means by "life" to begin with. Is the "process" of the sperm entering the egg, the impetus for life? Perhaps so, but without the combination of the two creating a particular process of replication, there is not going to be any life. If life does start, it will continue until the "process" ends.
      Frankly, I don't believe in the myth of Mary, I think she was invented by Mark, the first gospel writer, and then embellished by Matthew and Luke. Mark knows nothing of virgin births and John votes no, given that the probably understood the original word referred to in Isaiah referred to a "maiden" or "young woman," not a virgin. The author would have used the word "betulah" instead of "almah" if the actual virginity mattered. (Of course Isaiah 7:14 has nothing to do with messiahs in any case). Paul certainly knows nothing of virgin births, and he's the first author, the one closest to the events in time. After the first page of Acts, she completely disappears from the scene. (Along with Pilate's interest in an empty tomb!). I also don't believe in original sin, or a fall from grace. There is no identifiable event in our evolutionary history to confirm this metaphorical story. Our DNA tells us that humans evolved from a pool of early ancestors, not a single breeding couple. And of course, snakes don't have vocal cords!
      As for burning for eternity, I agree. The bible is pretty clear that we will be consumed, destroyed, burned up... in short, as John 3:16 says, we will perish, and to perish is to die. I also know there are four very different words (Sheol, Hades, Tartarus, Gehenna) that the Church translated to the pagan word, "Hell," none of which is the Hell we think of. However, it must be admitted that most Christian denominations believe in a literal place of hellfire. Most Christians worship an evil god and apparently don't realize it.

  • @jongricafort4
    @jongricafort4 4 роки тому +2

    Original Sin, what is the mystery behind this?
    If we look at some of the prominent paintings, one must look at the "womb" of Eve, it is covered with leaves and some painted it with some branches or stems coming out of the womb of Eve. How do we interpret this? The womb of Eve is the symbol of the "Tree of Knowledge of Good & Evil". And the womb of Eve can bring fruit thru "procreation".
    In contrast, the Tree of Life is the prefigurement of Mary and Her fruit is Jesus Christ the source of "eternal life".
    Now, how do Eve fall into the serpent trap?
    The serpent "beguiled or deceive" Eve that She can produce a "fruit or an offspring" and this "offspring" is the most pleasing offering to God instead of the "work of their hands".
    Adam & Eve is glorifying God thru the work of their hands by preserving & guarding God's creation. But the serpent "beguiled" Eve that a "child or an offspring" is the most pleasing offering to God. And so, Eve ask the serpent how?
    The serpent now "touch" the "sacred womb" of Eve, the serpent had "defiled" the sanctity of the womb of Eve. And we can see this from the punishment the serpent had received, God said "because you have done this or because you have "touch" the womb" of Eve by your malice, God not only cursed the serpent but God removed some of the power of Satan by removing his arms & legs a symbol that Satan power had diminished.
    What is the effect after the serpent had touch or defiled the sacred womb of Eve? Eve lost the "garments of light", and she appeared to Adam in a defiled state....
    If you were Adam what would you do, if you see Eve the one you love in that defiled state?

    • @truthbetold8610
      @truthbetold8610 4 роки тому +2

      Jong Ricafort Where did you come up with this silliness? You people have to over analyze every little detail and make comparisons and formulate conclusions that are just ridiculous. Where does it say in Genesis that Satan touched the "sacred womb" of Eve? Did you write your own Bible?

    • @jongricafort4
      @jongricafort4 4 роки тому +1

      @@truthbetold8610
      The punishment of Eve is with regards to procreation, what do you think happen to Eve?
      In the secular world, the famous phrase "never been touch" means the woman is still a virgin.
      The serpent cannot tempt Adam to fall, why? The "Light of God" emanates powerfully to Adam while satan can only produce a "false light". Adam's "Light" is more powerful than Satan before the fall. How about Eve? God did not breath in the Holy Spirit to Eve, Adam "lay his hands" to Eve because Adam is a High Priest an Overseer or a Bishop. Adam has the power to confer the gifts of the Holy Spirit and he anointed Eve to become deacon or a helper. Adam is a High Priest because the "garden of eden" is the Temple of God.
      Adam & Eve was 'offering the work of their hands & glorifying God in His creation" in the garden of Eden, which Lucifer once guarded before his fall.
      Satan saw that Eve has less light compare to Adam (see Ven.Agreda and Blessed Emmerich vision), and so, Satan device a strategy how to deceive Eve, how?
      By offering Eve how to gain "wisdom", What is "wisdom"? God had shown to Lucifer in the Heavenly Realm His Divine Plan for the Logos, the Word will be incarnated to a Woman, and Satan deceive Eve that She is the Woman who will give birth to Jesus the "Wisdom of God". (1Corinthian1:24 to 1Corinthian1:30).
      Eve saw how enticing the serpent suggestion is, and so, she entertain how she will give birth to Jesus the Wisdom of God.
      Now, the serpent purpose is to defile the "pure womb" of Eve because God had not yet told Adam that it is now the perfect time to "procreate", Adam & Eve must undergo "theosis" first.
      But since, Eve fall into the trap of satan, Eve had allowed satan to caress her pure womb...(see Valtorta's writing).
      That's why St.Ambrose and St.Augustine had reflected on the original sin, that original sin involves "lust" or concupiscence of the flesh.
      Now what is the original sin? Catechism of the Church CCC400 stated it was "marked by lust".

    • @cryptfire3158
      @cryptfire3158 4 роки тому +1

      @@jongricafort4 you need to study the real bible. Don't assume ANYTHING that it doesn't specifically say. Otherwise you just get 20 thousand religions each with their own ideas. Bible is the word of God, and if God didn't say it, i GUARANTEE it's not something that matters.
      Also i realize i'm commenting on a Catholic video. The catholic religion can't save, but a personal relationship with the Lord, where you are born again can. And i don't mean baptism is born again

    • @jongricafort4
      @jongricafort4 4 роки тому +2

      @@cryptfire3158
      Sorry the True Jesus Christ founded a Church and did not leave the apostles with a bible. Jesus commanded the Apostles to preach and not based their teaching on the bible because the Holy Spirit the Spirit of Truth dwelling in them is the one who will testify about the TRUTH.
      Peter is the Vicar of Christ and the only one whom Jesus entrusted His Keys to His Kingdom.(Matthew16:19)
      St.Paul recognized Peter's Authority and not only Peter but also James and John that's why in Galatians2:8-10, St.Paul acknowledging that he was baptized under Peter's authority had to seek the "right hand" of this three pillars.
      Sorry, St.Paul is united with Peter and all the Apostles. So, all the Christians denominations like St.Paul must humbly submit to the authority of Peter the Supreme Pontiff of the Universal Church the People of God. Tell your Pastors to embrace Ecumenism like St.Paul did.

    • @cryptfire3158
      @cryptfire3158 4 роки тому +1

      @@jongricafort4 you must be following a cult, and are too blind to see it.
      You have an unhealthy obsession with Peter. Worship of any one besides Jesus is creating a false God.
      Jesus has been alive from eternity, Peter was not.
      Jesus created Peter, Peter was just a man.
      Jesus had no sin, Peter did.
      Jesus is the saviour of the world, Peter just followed Jesus. He is the alpha and omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last, the almighty God.
      And your Galations chapter 2 reference DEFINITELY doesn't teach what you said.

  • @bierguy3033
    @bierguy3033 3 роки тому

    Comment for algorithm.

  • @praveenUFO
    @praveenUFO 4 роки тому +2

    JESUS said " I AM THE WAY THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE"

    • @jongricafort4
      @jongricafort4 4 роки тому

      praveen jacob
      But Jesus must follow the Will of the Father. I have come not to do my will but the Will of the Father who sent me.
      Read also Matthew7:21.
      God the Father did not said "Jesus Alone".
      God the Father had made a Holy Decree in Genesis3:15. God the Father had declare a war, a perennial enmity between the Woman vs. Satan and their offsprings.
      Jesus became the first offspring of the Woman.
      We cannot separate Jesus from the Woman the Theotokos.
      God the Father gave us only TWO CHOICES, after the Fall of Adam & Eve.
      Either we belong to the Woman like Jesus did or to the serpent.
      So, who do you belong Woman or Serpent?

  • @tongakhan230
    @tongakhan230 4 роки тому +2

    Such a lengthy sermon for something very simple.
    Adam, a perfect man sinned and was sentenced to death. His children, namely us, inherited that imperfection.
    God sends his son from heaven to be born as a human and end up as a perfect man as Adam was.
    Eye for and eye, life for a life.
    Jesus gives his life to pay off Adam's sin's penalty. This releases all Adam's children from this imperfection of being born just to age and die.
    John 3:16 'God loved the world so much that he gave his only begotten son, so that everyone exercising faith in him might not be destroyed but have everlasting life.'

    • @alan-muscat
      @alan-muscat Рік тому

      I preferred the lengthy sermon.

  • @alephtav4254
    @alephtav4254 4 роки тому

    The NEW and the Last ADAM who fulfulled the LAW Given to Moses at MT. SINAI and the One who said IT is FINISHED.. The SIN was lifted at the Desert by Moses and Jesus was lifted as SINs of all mankind..The Father of Vipers lost his Grip to God creation.. His deceiving ways are Finished.. Already Revealed all his Lies..Jesus Paid it All.. Thannk You Avah Yeshua.. For Conquering Death for US.. And bring us to LIFE by looking to YOU by what you have done for US on that Calvary You didnt despise the Cross..

    • @kvas2142
      @kvas2142 4 роки тому

      Man always becomes an animal in his fall. Sheep easily turn into ferocious wolves, dogs and pigs. Remember the numerous tales :))

  • @Younified
    @Younified 3 місяці тому

    why do you not use the KJV??

    • @geoffjs
      @geoffjs 2 місяці тому

      Presumably because it is not Catholic. Did the KJV ever include the apocrypha?

  • @stevehauk
    @stevehauk 4 роки тому

    Dr. Brant, so is DEATH being *personified* as the *last enemy in 1Co 15 and in Rev **20:14* And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
    I would really appreciate your response to this, as Have struggled with it for years. Thank you

    • @AveChristusRex
      @AveChristusRex 4 роки тому

      The words for death and hell in the Greek were those used by Jews and Christians to refer to the place of the dead in general (including purgatory), not the hell of the damned. Therefore, the idea is that these places are no longer needed, only one place of the damned.

    • @jongricafort4
      @jongricafort4 4 роки тому

      Death & hell appeared a separate word and have a different meaning. When we speak of first death, it means we lost Divine Life, a means to participate in a Divine relationship which Adam & Eve enjoy in the garden of eden. To restore Divine Life in us because all of us inherited spiritual death by contracting original sin thru Adam, we need to receive Divine Life or sanctifying grace to purify or heal our soul, it's like once again God "breath-in" the Holy Spirit in us for us to become a "living soul".
      How about the second death? Since all of us contracted the orginal sin, we are all "spiritually dead" meaning we have a soul but it has no Divine Life or sanctifying grace.
      Now, if we do not receive baptism either thru the Catholic Church or other means God mysteriously provided like in some of our Christian brothers faith, then we will die without "Divine Life" in us. Our destination is "hell" a place wherein the people have rejected the "Mercy of God" thru the offering of Jesus Christ redemption and teachings on salvation.
      Since our soul have no "divine life", it has suffered the "first death", and if we reject the Mercy of God which God is offering up to our last breath, then we deserve to go to hell as hell is the rejection of the Mercy of God. Then our soul who had suffered the first death will now be thrown into the "lake of fire"...the torments the soul had to suffer in this lake of fire will bring the "second death" which is a "death of soul", but they say the soul in hell will suffer for eternity...so the second death really does not exist...unless "torments in the lake of fire" is enough to kill or bring death to a soul.

    • @jongricafort4
      @jongricafort4 4 роки тому

      @
      Adam to Noah is around 2000 years. The earth was renewed thru the Water/Flood. (God the Father action)
      another 2000 years, the earth was renewed by the blood of Christ. (God the Son action)
      another 2000 years the earth will soon be renew by fire. (God the Holy Spirit action)
      WATER, BLOOD and FIRE is needed for a New Creation to fully happen.
      After this, the Remnant Church will enter the New Paradise and a Eucharistic Reign of Jesus Christ for 1000 years will happen.
      2000 + 2000 + 2000 + 1000 = 7,000 or 7 x 100 ( The Divine Plan of God is perfect and complete).
      We are just waiting for the Second Pentecost, "A fire will fall" and it will burn the hearts of all the Marian Faithfuls but to the enemies of Christ "a fire will fall" to burn them.(LaSalette Prophecy).
      When will the Second Pentecost be? Year 2022....the 50th year of Cenacle just like the 50 days before the first Pentecost happen.
      See this link..mmp-usa.net/the-purpose-of-the-cenacle/

    •  4 роки тому

      @@jongricafort4 You have many points I agree with.
      Increasingly I see 2,000 years from Cross as having the most support.
      If one dares to dabble in dates.

    • @jongricafort4
      @jongricafort4 4 роки тому

      @
      Why do you think that today, even the Christian denominations like Francis Chan are now awakening to the importance of the Holy Eucharist?
      Because only the faithful who embraced a Eucharistic Life can enter the New Paradise, why? Because the Book of Revelation said the New Paradise is where the thousands years of Eucharistic Reign of Jesus Christ will happen. The Holy Eucharist the Fruit from the Tree of Life just like in the Old Paradise.
      All the faithful whose hearts are burning after the Second Pentecost like the picture of the Two Hearts of Jesus & Mary. Our hearts must be set on fire to defeat the forces of darkness that will be set free in these end times. but no worries (John1:5).
      Genesis3:15 is now going to unfold, the moment the Antichrist or the Antipope forcefully take over the Seat of Peter, the Woman will appear to crush the ugly proud head of the Antichrist/Antipope right at the very Chair of Peter to show to all the faithful and unbelievers the power of the Blessed Virgin Mary the Woman destined to crush the head of satan.

  • @Wrent_Free
    @Wrent_Free 3 роки тому +1

    What's not made clear here is how this "original sin" passes on from generation to generation. Are you saying that we are all Adam's biological children? Or are you saying that despite the fact we hold no biological link to Adam we still somehow inherit that sin. If that's the case, how are we inheriting it (if not through a biological link)? Did God create other people alongside Adam who were guilty of the sin in a story we never heard? Or did God make people with the sin just built in, no need for the Garden or fruit?

    • @JJ-nn8kr
      @JJ-nn8kr 3 роки тому

      Why can’t you imagine we as Adam’s children?
      Why don’t you consider ‘ just as what we do’ God first advice, then materialize.
      In hindsight, original sin inaugurated the use of freewill against God (thus ‘experienced’ the knowledge of good/evil and God’s response/judgement).

    • @Wrent_Free
      @Wrent_Free 3 роки тому +2

      @@JJ-nn8kr seems like a stretch. Don't see you as having a reason or explanation as to how this would necessarily be true, just that you like the idea of it. Which is fine.

    • @instrumentengineer5823
      @instrumentengineer5823 2 роки тому

      There is No Original Sin

    • @instrumentengineer5823
      @instrumentengineer5823 2 роки тому

      And their Lord called to them(ADAM & EVE a.s.), "Did I Not Forbid you from that tree and tell you that SATAN IS to you a CLEAR ENEMY?"
      They replied, “Our Lord! We HAVE WRONGED OURSELVES. If You do not FORGIVE US and have Mercy on us, we will certainly be LOSERS.” 7.22-23
      "So ALLAH ACCEPTED HIS REPENTANCE. Surely HE is the Accepter of Repentance, MOST MERCIFUL"
      Qur'an Majeed 2.37
      "CHILD WILL NOT SHARE the GUILT OF the PARENT, nor will the parent share the guilt of the child. The righteousness of the righteous will be credited to them, and the WICKEDNESS OF the WICKED WILL BE CHARGED AGAINST THEM." Ezikel 18.20

    • @Wrent_Free
      @Wrent_Free 2 роки тому

      @@instrumentengineer5823 and Dumbledore said to voldemort, blah blah blah. Everyone has a favorite fairy tale. I dont understand why you think yours is so special.

  • @zombiesheep.whatsinyourhea9166

    Why is wanting knowledge a sin? We are suppose to educate and have natural curiosity. Why would God want us to remain dumb?

    • @tookie36
      @tookie36 3 місяці тому

      Wanting knowledge isn’t a sin. The fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil is told of us not to eat it bc we are not god. To us it is poison. We cannot grasp the full picture so when we consume the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil we initiate the fall. Sin was once external as was the fruit but it causes us many problems. Such as feeling naked to god as well as suffering in the cycles of birth and work

  • @5thdhealth
    @5thdhealth 4 роки тому

    V:XVII Leviticus Suppose you sin by violating one of the Lord's commands. Even if you are unaware of what you have done, you are guilty and will be punished for your sin. For guilt offering, you must bring to the priest your own ram with no defects, or you may buy one at equal value. Through this process the priest will purify you from your unintentional sin, making you right with the Lord and you will be forgiven.
    The hour glass has run out of sand, and he passes up the chance for heaven. Now the whole world will go to war and they all have nuclear bombs this time around. The Holocaust behind closed doors is nothing to ignore. Fresh water sources will be scarce with no running water.
    XXI:XXIII Exodus But if there is no further injury, the punishment must match the injury: a life for a life, an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a hand for a hand, a foot for a foot, a burn for a burn, a wound for a wound, and a bruise for a bruise.
    Imagine the catastrophe from beaches of Normandy crashing down on the east, and west coast. Gone! One third of the earth will be destroyed if he continues down the same path. There will be too great of casualties just like Hitler. The grid will collapse, and the dollar bill will be useless just like currency from any other fallen nation. THIS MOMENT IS THE REASON THE BIBLE WAS WRITTEN.
    Presenting himself before me after 40 years Hitler fought his way through the fire, and we meet again. He sacrificed himself to protect me this time around, and his story begins as the son of an evil dictator who thought he was God. He wakes up on the other side of the Berlin wall oppressed in America.
    Watching his Mother get beat in front of him for trying to protect him changed him. He remembers her blood splattered on the wall, and she did what she had to do to survive, but she was a slave with no money to leave. Still he suffered too, because she was weaker then him. His step father took advantage of his position of authority awarding himself all the financial power by the government. Beating after beating with boards that had nails in them she couldn’t tell the police, because they would take his money and she would get blamed for it .
    Children from families who must survive in a war zone aren’t allowed to take drugs for their post traumatic stress if they are attacked on American soil. He is a wounded child of America oppressed, and sent to prison locked up, and persecuted because it is illegal for children of dictators to take pain away. “Drug offenders" are targeted blamed, and sent to concentration camps to suffer for his glorification.
    Only appearing American the President approves medication for the ones that he himself has drafted to fight in brutal war across seas. Supporting the dictators in the household they are labeled heroes, and honored. Keep it all a secret, and don’t let Trump know he loses no matter what.
    NEXT IN LINE TRUMP PLEADS GUILTY and sits his daughter at his right hand. He gives her control to sign more excuses into law. He thought he was doing the right thing too, and follows right along with Hitler's script handing it to his daughter to follow along. She is his sacrifice giving her a responsible position the cards stack against her for each child she now held responsible.
    XXXII:XXXV Jeremiah They have built pagan shrines to Baal in the valley of Ben-Hinnom, and there they sacrifice their sons and daughters to Molech. I have never commanded such a horrible deed; it never even crossed my mind to command such a thing. What an incredible evil, causing Judah to sin so greatly!
    Imagine being my little girl, and the Father wants to see you alone then touches you inappropriately making you feel ashamed. She told me already, but there is nothing I can do about it. She thinks I have abandoned her, and I know how my daughter feels along with every other child in this nation, and all the pieces start fitting as I analyze the situation.
    The greater the influence the greater the damage. Trump's daughter becomes his Mother, and her blood is next to be splattered on the wall. Beating after beating with boards that had nails in them. The star of the donkey show, and he faces the horrors of prison when he takes the blame for killing her. His fake Father never got caught, because when he tried to call the police he lied changing his story to fit his needs.
    Suffering for him to dictate every dog has it's last days, and will have his turn to take the punishment for the shot-caller to remain innocent, and superior. Waking up on the other side of the Mexican wall oppressed without a Mother is where the Trumps gets dumped. A slave in a jail cell cleaning up filth just to be raped by inmates that's the life he is building for himself.
    III:XVI John For God loved the world so much that he gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish but have eternal life. God sent his Son into the world not to judge the world but to save the world through him.
    IX:XXXVI Mark He sat down, and called twelve disciples over to him and said, “whoever wants to be the first must take last place and be the servant of everyone else.” Then he put a little child among them. Taking the little child in his arms he said to them, “Anyone who welcome a little child like this on my behalf welcomes me, and anyone who welcomes me welcomes not only me but also my Father who sent me.”
    BEHOLD A CHANGED MAN. Step by step I pick him up as my Shepard’s stick, and carry him through the sands of time. An inspiration I give him the breath life, and he transforms from a snake to a Cain. This time I will name him my Arc Angel Michael, because he fought for me.
    I PICK HIM UP AND BREATH LIFE INTO HIM AND CARRY HIM THROUGH THE SANDS OF TIME. AN INSPIRATION HE BECOMES A SHEPARD'S STICK. A SNAKE TO A CAIN IT'S A MIRACLE.
    STOP! Take the Ram instead.
    XXVI:XIII-XV Jeremiah But if you stop your sinning and begin to obey the Lord your God, he will change his mind about this disaster he has announced against you. As for me, I am in your hands- do with me as you think best. But if you kill me, rest assured that you will be killing in innocent man! The responsibility for such a deed will lie on you, on this city, on every person living in it. For it is absolutely true that the Lord sent me to speak to words you heard.
    VII:LIV-LVI Acts The Jewish leaders were infuriated by Steven’s accusations, and they shook their fists at him in rage. But Steven full of the Holy Spirit gazed steadily into heaven and saw the glory of God and he saw Jesus standing in the place of Honor and God's right hand. And he told them, “Look I see the heavens opened and the Son of Man standing in the place of Honor at God's right hand!”
    CXIV: III-VI Psalm The Red Sea saw them coming and hurried out of their way! The water Jordan River turned away. The mountains skipped like Rams, the hills like lambs! What's wrong Red Sea that made you hurry out of the way? What happened, Jordan River that you turned away? Why mountains, did you skip like Rams? Why, hills, like lambs?

    • @truthbetold8610
      @truthbetold8610 4 роки тому

      Is all that really necessary?

    • @jongricafort4
      @jongricafort4 4 роки тому +1

      @Patrick Montgomery
      ua-cam.com/video/p5TGfisOKMM/v-deo.html

  • @johnpro2847
    @johnpro2847 5 місяців тому

    was the first Adam a neanderthal, homo erects or early homo sapien..were they black fellas or white fella as depicted in all paintings ..

  • @edgarmorales4476
    @edgarmorales4476 3 роки тому +1

    There is no original sin! We are not innately bad, but the opposite, we are innately good; but we have an ego that causes us to see ourselves separate, lacking and at odds with life and others; at odds with Love, so we behave badly. But we are not bad! We are mistaken, we misunderstand life.
    Everyone has an ego, and it is not of Love. The ego is also not evil, although it is behind all acts we would consider evil.
    The ego is not a thing or an entity, it's just programming to take care of number one. This programming causes us to be self-servicing, self-centered, fearful, distrusting, defensive and aggressive.
    The ego is a sense of self, not something real or true. A sense of self is nothing tangible, nothing that can't be fairly easily overlooked, if its lack of realness is pointed out.
    The ego is programming that causes us to see life, ourselves and others through a particular lense; one tainted by fear, judgment, limitation, smallness and a sense of lack.
    The egoic programming creates a sense of being under attack or threatened by others and by life. The ego is in fear much of the time, and therefore divorced from Love.
    This fear is an illusion, an imagination of something fearful in the future; not based on an actual threat in the here and now.
    When we're identified with this very primitive part of ourselves, we believe in the ego's fears and try to protect ourselves any way we can; usually by trying to attain more wealth, comfort, power, security, control, success, popularity and admiration; all things that make the ego safer, at least temporarily.

    • @instrumentengineer5823
      @instrumentengineer5823 2 роки тому

      And their Lord called to them(ADAM & EVE a.s.), "Did I Not Forbid you from that tree and tell you that SATAN IS to you a CLEAR ENEMY?"
      They replied, “Our Lord! We HAVE WRONGED OURSELVES. If You do not FORGIVE US and have Mercy on us, we will certainly be LOSERS.” 7.22-23
      "So ALLAH ACCEPTED HIS REPENTANCE. Surely HE is the Accepter of Repentance, MOST MERCIFUL"
      Qur'an Majeed 2.37
      "CHILD WILL NOT SHARE the GUILT OF the PARENT, nor will the parent share the guilt of the child. The righteousness of the righteous will be credited to them, and the WICKEDNESS OF the WICKED WILL BE CHARGED AGAINST THEM." Ezikel 18.20

  • @teenherofilms
    @teenherofilms 4 роки тому

    Is your sin original, or just an ordinary one? Try to make your sins as original as possible.

    • @truthbetold8610
      @truthbetold8610 4 роки тому

      That's good, I like that!

    • @timothyseals3791
      @timothyseals3791 2 роки тому

      The original sin doctrine is not biblical and is leading people to hell.

  • @jchrg2336
    @jchrg2336 3 роки тому

    Dark age peoples studying others ,ruining them as putting vences round the nakedness peoples in their kingdom, who knowsx! was the writers there at the time when Adam did, he did something but for who in text writing to judge if it is or was a sin, and how do you know, I wasn't around even later when jesus got cruisified to the cross for that to be a point to state that what your speech is stating
    Is it because you want to wear fancy clothes, or live in a luxurious house that you state that those are sinners or who is sinner and who is not sinner!

  • @ptgannon1
    @ptgannon1 4 роки тому +2

    He's talking about Adam and Eve as though they were real people? I thought the Catholic Church accepted evolution.... According to DNA evidence, we evolved from a pool of early ancestors, not a single breeding pair. And what could evolving humans, who woke up every morning on the menu, do to tick off an all-powerful god who presumably can't be hurt, to such an extent that he would curse all of us for something we had nothing to do with? Was it attaining a certain level of conscious self-awareness? No? How about learning to make fire and use tools? No, it had to be learning to talk that really got the Big Guy's panties in a wad!
    And what's with all this talk of Jesus coming to save all of mankind? The Church is pretty explicit in telling us we have to believe, say and do the right things in order to be saved. This so-called salvation is conditional on believing a fanciful tale that breaks the laws of physics.
    And what are we being saved from? The Church translated four very different words to the pagan word, "Hell." Those words are Sheol, Hades, Tartarus and Gahanna. Look them up. They are all different, and none of them are the Hell we were indoctrinated to believe in. And what's with the contradiction? The Church says we go to Hell, a place of fire, if we don't believe, say and do the right things, but the talk here is all about death. The bible tells us that Hell and its fires are eternal, but it says nothing of ongoing punishment for humans. We are to be consumed, destroyed, burned up - it's right there in John 3:16. If we don't believe the right thing we perish. We die. So what's up with all this talk of eternal torment from the Church? Where did that come from?
    When I was a young Catholic lad, I was informed that in Hell my skin would be burned off, sizzling like a piece of bacon thrown in an excessively hot frying pan, and that it would constantly be replenished from below so that I would scream in agony for all eternity. (They didn't bother to note that the human consciousness can only survive that kind of pain for a matter of seconds before it blanks out).
    What I want to know is - when is the Catholic Church going to formally apologize for all the psychological abuse they heaped on impressionable children before they were capable of critical thinking?

    • @alejandrocanela691
      @alejandrocanela691 4 роки тому +1

      You sound extremely confused, lad. Pick up a book or something, jeez.

    • @kieranfenn
      @kieranfenn 4 роки тому +1

      @@alejandrocanela691 No. This is a valid question. Genesis 3 is part of the larger context of Sin stories. Adam is a type of all of us. We too find that evil can be attractive, that today the earth rises up against us as in the Flood by our lack of care for it, that the sin of patriarchy when Adam names Eve as he named the animals, that nations are divided as in the Tower of Babel. The sin at the origins that we call Original Sin is our own personal journey but for the love of God start using Original Innocence for an infant until the child becomes capable of making moral choices and as for Original Sin being passed on through the sexual intercourse of the parents this is a revolting denial of a God given goodness. The stories are to explain realities; we are all Adam and Eve, when we have maturity to choose the evil or the good.

    • @anneschofield9726
      @anneschofield9726 4 роки тому

      Hi Pat; I dont think that you should except an apology from anyone. Luke 16:31 has the best explanation of the absence of hope. Father Rippinger, Exorcist - also has excellent teachings.

    • @ptgannon1
      @ptgannon1 4 роки тому

      @@alejandrocanela691 thank you for your intellectual contribution.

    • @ptgannon1
      @ptgannon1 4 роки тому +1

      "and as for Original Sin being passed on though the sexual intercourse of the parents..." Interesting comment. It's my understanding that Mary had to be a virgin so as to avoid passing on original sin to Jesus, a byproduct of sexual intercourse and a possible explanation for the Church's obsession with all things sexual. At the time, they didn't understand that women contributed 50% of the genetic material to the offspring, so they thought the woman simply carried the offspring, and therefore didn't contribute to the original sin herself. Then in the 1800s they discovered that women contribute half the genetic material, so that meant Mary, whose parents would have passed original sin on to her through their sexual relations, had original sin whether she was a virgin or not, and would have passed it along to Jesus. What to do, what to do? The Church decided, in 1854 if my memory is correct, that Mary was born without original sin, thus solving the problem.
      Jesus had to be born sinless, the first man since Adam to be born that way, and the only way to do that was to make sure Mary didn't have the curse of original sin. The bible, of course, says nothing of any of this.
      The problem with the Church's solution however, is that it strongly suggests and implies that Yahweh is fully capable of removing or preventing original sin for Mary, and if he can do it for her, surely he can do it for everyone. If he can simply snap his fingers and remove or prevent original sin for Mary why does he rely on the convoluted Rube Goldberg contraption of impregnating a young virgin* with himself so he could be born as himself, so he could sacrifice himself, to himself, in order to relieve us of a condition he placed on us in the first place? That's the best an all-powerful god can come up with? Sorry, I'm not impressed.
      *Note that the idea of Mary's virginity is based on an incorrect translation of Isaiah 7:14. The word "almah" means young woman or maiden - not virgin. The author would have used the word "betulah" if sexual status actually mattered. The passage out of Isaiah has nothing to do with messiah's to begin with.

  • @bikashshah6050
    @bikashshah6050 3 роки тому

    if god created adam and eve as perfect people, they would have not disobeyed and if they created as imperfect people they still made the decision to disobey but being imperfect people they would have done something wrong at some point because that's what imperfect people do. you cannot say here is an imperfect person who never did anything wrong in the entire life that absurd so if it wasn't the disobedience in the garden of Eden it would have been something else at some other time now why did God get so angry so god made them imperfect which means he shares in the responsibility god shares in the responsibility what Adam and eve did. he did not warn them by the way kids if you happen to meet a talking serpent don't listen to him because he is evil and will try to mislead you god never said anything like that. so adam a has no experience what so ever in good and evil in obeying disobeying and making moral choices so they made a mistake and incidentally. so why did go get into such divine fury at this one mistake which was likely to be done at some point because they did not have any prior experience to guide them?

    • @JJ-nn8kr
      @JJ-nn8kr 3 роки тому

      Scripts as is does not convey anything. Our mind does while reading. If you do not believe in Gen 1:1 that itself means you cannot follow the author of genesis (and rest of the Bible) as the authors wanted to tell about God, the only real thing which happened to be a person and everything else are His ‘live’ work. Or in other words without the assistance of the spirit which helped the authors of Bible you don’t understand what they meant. As Einstein is attributed to have said (my paraphrase) what we read in a minute was arrived at by men in multiple years of painstaking efforts.
      If at all an iota of truth in your accusation on God, you would have long dead using the same freewill God has given. That means you love the life (everything necessarily is a gift!) but wanted even better. We all do. The difference is that such a utopian life can only provide by the same God, and as things stands, there is a way God offers to fetch that life.
      Though, one can argue against why God send some to Hell, if at all that occurs that necessarily is just simply because “God is the only reality”, your denying that even in my opinion is arguably justifiable for such a punishment.
      You might wonder why you missed such an ‘obvious’ God? The reason is your free will: you actively preferred fault finding rather than fact finding.

  • @damagedgoods143
    @damagedgoods143 2 роки тому

    came here for my homework

    • @timothyseals3791
      @timothyseals3791 2 роки тому

      The doctrine of original sin is not biblical. This is a false man made doctrine.

  • @truthbetold8610
    @truthbetold8610 4 роки тому

    Why do you have to make simple things so seemingly complicated? It means what it says through one man Adam, sin entered the world and through one man, Jesus we have the release from sin. It just so happens that Paul was long-winded and repeats Himself. So much of what you say is redundant.

    • @jongricafort4
      @jongricafort4 4 роки тому

      truth be told
      Matthew12:36-37

    • @truthbetold8610
      @truthbetold8610 4 роки тому

      @@jongricafort4 Jesus was talking to the Pharisees, whole different scenario.

    • @jongricafort4
      @jongricafort4 4 роки тому

      @@truthbetold8610
      Proverbs18:2

    • @truthbetold8610
      @truthbetold8610 4 роки тому

      @@jongricafort4 Don't be so hard on yourself, you could try learning.

    • @jongricafort4
      @jongricafort4 4 роки тому +1

      @@truthbetold8610
      We have the Catechism of the Catholic Church, I don't need to learn by myself, I already have a Church who provided us the universal teachings that is 100% guided by the Holy Spirit the Spirit of Truth as Jesus promised. (1Timothy3:15)
      How about your personal interpretation?
      hmmmm.. just keep it to yourself...why?
      Creating and worshipping a fake jesus according to your personal interpretation is IDOLATRY!

  • @ewaldradavich7307
    @ewaldradavich7307 4 роки тому +1

    Baptism doesn't take away any sin. Thief on the cross wasn't baptized but was saved

    • @ewaldradavich7307
      @ewaldradavich7307 4 роки тому +1

      @Patrick Montgomery. Regardless old or new he made it 2 heaven. He was n Abraham's bosom 4 a second. A saint is one set apart for God. Paul called believers saints. Romans 3:23/
      Romans 3:10/Romans 6:23/
      Romans 5:8/Romans 10:9-10
      Romans 10:13/ Ephesians 2:8-9

    • @jongricafort4
      @jongricafort4 4 роки тому

      @@ewaldradavich7307
      The thief was only shown the Paradise but he does not belong in that place. Abrahams bosoms is for all the elect who lived a righteuosly,"holy & blameless".
      Jesus told to the thief, if you endure your purification in purgatory on the lower level of this Hell, then you will become one of them, who wash their robe to be worthy of Heaven.
      Proof?
      In the famous painting, we can see that when Jesus brought the thief to Paradise, the artist painted the thief like a beggar while Abraham and all the elect was wearing "white robes" ready to go to Heaven.
      The thief like all of us, if we do not live righteously must undergo purification, and it is where the Mercy of God fully manifest by purging us to become worthy to enter God's Kingdom.
      Because God's Holy Decree in Heaven is "nothing defiled shall enter the Kingdom of God".
      But what kind of Kingdom, is God's Kingdom?
      ANSWER : Exodus19:16 and 1Peter2:9 "God's Kingdom is a Kingdom of Priest"....so the Catholic Church who teaches common priesthood on the laity and ministerial priesthood is the TRUE CHRISTIAN who can enter Heaven directly because we embraced our priesthood by offering our sacrifice united to Christ suffering. (Collosians1:24).
      All other Christian and Non-Christian who do not see themselves as a priest, will find themselves out of place in Heaven, because all of God Saints are all "PRIEST" like Jesus the Eternal High Priest.

    • @ewaldradavich7307
      @ewaldradavich7307 4 роки тому +1

      @@jongricafort4. Ur saying Jesus, who is God, can't forgive sin & tell a person that they r going 2 heaven. U really need to read the bible 4 itself without prejudice. U r very incorrect.

    • @ewaldradavich7307
      @ewaldradavich7307 4 роки тому +1

      @@jongricafort4. Jesus only spoke
      scripture never roman catholic catachism.

    • @jongricafort4
      @jongricafort4 4 роки тому

      @@ewaldradavich7307
      Jesus founded a Church, a visible Church with a visible head, the Vicar or the Supreme Pontiff.
      Jesus gave Peter the Keys to His Kingdom. (Matthew16:19)
      Did Jesus gave a Duplicate Keys to you or to your Pastor? NO!
      So, how can you enter Heaven?

  • @leonardu6094
    @leonardu6094 2 роки тому

    Lmao I don't think these people realize that if Adam and Jesus are parallels, and you hold the Augustinian conception of Original sin, then you're also logically committed to the view of Universalism.

    • @Ekim1740
      @Ekim1740 Рік тому

      Find me a Bible verse that disproves that the catholic concept of Original sin.

    • @leonardu6094
      @leonardu6094 Рік тому

      @@Ekim1740 Are you able o read at all? How does this address the point I made above?

    • @Ekim1740
      @Ekim1740 Рік тому

      @@leonardu6094 So do you believe in Original sin?

    • @leonardu6094
      @leonardu6094 Рік тому

      @@Ekim1740 No, Not the Augustinian doctrine.

    • @Ekim1740
      @Ekim1740 Рік тому

      @@leonardu6094 why? what verse in the bible contradict augustines opinion?

  • @aerodave1
    @aerodave1 2 роки тому

    The concept of the soul separating from the body at death is a Catholic invention. The bible does not say that the soul leaves the body at death. The bible says that when a person dies the breath of life leaves the body and the person is completely dead. At creation God created Adam with two parts: body and breath of life. If you destroy one of those you no longer are a living soul.

  • @chosenskeptic5319
    @chosenskeptic5319 4 роки тому +1

    Origin sin is a heresy. Adam and Eve were not under a covenant to transgress against god. Therefore, to disobey is not sin, since sin is transgression against God’s covenant. Therefore, there was no sin law to sin, there was no repentance.

    • @paularnold3745
      @paularnold3745 2 роки тому

      You are mistaken about there not being a covenant between God and the first humans. Read Genesis 2: 15-17 and all of Genesis 3.

    • @chosenskeptic5319
      @chosenskeptic5319 2 роки тому

      @@paularnold3745 no sir, a command is not a covenant until God declares it is covenant whether it is punishable transgression or not 😮

    • @chosenskeptic5319
      @chosenskeptic5319 2 роки тому

      @@paularnold3745 the Adamic covenant is a man made assertion only, God never declared an Adamic covenant 😮

  • @timothyseals3791
    @timothyseals3791 2 роки тому

    The doctrine of original sin is not biblical. This is a false man made doctrine.

  • @paulgerard4503
    @paulgerard4503 4 роки тому +1

    There never was an adam

    • @truthbetold8610
      @truthbetold8610 4 роки тому +1

      So you're calling Jesus a liar?

    • @truthbetold8610
      @truthbetold8610 4 роки тому +1

      @Patrick Montgomery I would say you are calling Him a liar. You said there never was an Adam, “[Jesus] said: ‘Did you not read [at Genesis 1:27; 2:24] that he who created them [Adam and Eve] from the beginning made them male and female and said, “For this reason a man will leave his father and his mother and will stick to his wife, and the two will be one flesh”?’”
      (Since Jesus believed the Genesis account to be factual, should we not believe it too?)
      Yes, you essentially called Jesus a liar by disputing His words.

    • @danielmann5427
      @danielmann5427 4 роки тому +1

      Than you wouldn't exist

    • @truthbetold8610
      @truthbetold8610 4 роки тому

      @Patrick Montgomery I'm sorry, I mistakenly put your name in, My comment was for Paul Glandy. He said there never was an Adam.
      I sincerely apologize!!!

    • @ptgannon1
      @ptgannon1 4 роки тому

      @Patrick Montgomery perhaps you are unaware that the Church has accepted the reality of evolution through natural selection. You may also be unaware that the Church is wrestling with DNA evidence that tells us that we almost certainly evolved from a pool of early primates, not a single breeding pair.
      If you'd like to proclaim that the Church is wrong in accepting evolution - which indeed has created quite a problem for them, one that fundagelicals shied away from when they realized the implications, then by all means take it up with the Church.
      Evolution pretty much does away with the "original sin" story. If humans evolved, what did our struggling ancestors do to tick off the Big Guy? They woke up every morning on the menu, struggling to survive another day and hopefully reproduce and pass on their genetics. What was their original sin? Attaining a particular level of self-aware consciousness? Learning to use tools and make fire? Oh, I know. What really ticked off the Big Guy was when they learned how to talk. That MUST have been the original sin, given that Yahweh who named himself "Jealous" must have really been torked when people began talking about things and people other than him!

  • @paulhandsome1691
    @paulhandsome1691 4 роки тому +1

    Jesus is New Adam and He's Body and Blood is Fruit of Eternal Life

    • @jongricafort4
      @jongricafort4 4 роки тому +1

      @Patrick Montgomery
      ua-cam.com/video/p5TGfisOKMM/v-deo.html