There are several reasons why our videos are in English: a) We are members of the English Department of Marburg University, our tuition language is English exclusively. b) We want to address an international audience. c) We have several international degree programs, e.g. the MA "Linguistics and Web Technology", with ca. 40 Students from 22 nations with more than 20 different mother tongues. We don't think that our video channel is a suitable forum for the discussion of language policy.
After finishing my MA program this year, I will do my best to translate as many of these e-lectures as i can into Arabic language (Allah willing) , thank you very much indeed, professor. ^__^
Hello! I really enjoyed the way you have explained this theory. What is more, your pronunciation is very clear ( I am from Argentina) and I did not have any kind of problems in understanding this video. Thank you so much for this. Regards!
I'm elderly. I've looked up the word linguistics in the dictionary many times in my life. I hear it used often in science subjects and of course there is the popularity and personality figure of Noam Chomsky and others. But what did left wing politics have to do with language~!? So many questions. Why is it important~? And lately, what in the world does it have to do with AI~? I've honestly never understood it except to reason only that "it's the study of language" (and then wonder why it isn't termed "languaegology"?) THIS lecture brings to me an epiphany. I've learned more in these 11:22 minutes than in all my life about this subject. I am so happy right now. Thank you,
I don't think that Proxyy7 was wrong over the years. So please do not throw yourself into the next river! The question mark CAN be used for questionable grammaticality, for example, if native speakers are in doubt about the acceptance of a particular construction (see Quirk/Svartvik: Investigating linguistic acceptability). But is also often used if sentences are conceptually strange but grammatically correct, like Chomsk'y famous "? Flying planes can be dangerous." So we are both right.
Thank u so much for such an excellent topic ..excellent just because by ur way of delivering ..but I want to know do i have to explain the whole ps component and lexicon in gg ..as I m preparing for my examination
This presentation is very interesting. I am gonna present in a seminar. We get to choose a topic and I have chosen syntactic acquisition from nativist point of view. Do you happen to have videos related to my topic?
Beautiful. Yet, as a speaker of Arabic I can’t see what’s new about this module in comparison to what Sibawayh has already established (ca. 750 ad) even this categorization of grammatically correct but semantically odd is mentioned among four categories of speech in his book. Could someone explain what’s new about Chomsky’s theory?
Could you please answer me about the question what is the relationship between between surface / deep structure from one hand and transformational grammar of the other hand?
I would say that number of hypothetical sentences is infinite. But number of actual sentences (or even usable sentences) is finite (suntactically). Why? Length of the word will actually never go beyond certain bound. Length of sentence is actually limited (by time and comprehension abilities). Also number of actual words in the language is limited because even though new words are constantly created, some words are forgotten, human brains are limited. Duration of existence of humanity is probably limited too. But if we are not looking at just the syntax/grammar, but also the association between the word and concept it points to, then we get sort of fuzzyness in the sense that the concept can be little bit different in everyones mind. So those would be infinite and uncountable.
I understand and create ill-formed sentences everyday as an English speaker living in Japan. Most, if not all the marked natural sentences my students create can be classified on a continuum of well-formed to illformed and contain atypical and typical form-meaning segments. But they all interpretable and reforming them into 'well-formed sentences' is no easy task. Attempt variations abound. Variations between native speakers abound. These are real problems for Generative Grammar and explain to me why Construction Grammar is so much more appealing these days. I can't say whether Construction Grammar can answer these questions either...but I suspect language is like a gas, not a solid matter, and defies the kinds of mechanical explanations Chomsky and his followers insist is a realistic possibility. We really only have a vague sense or intuition about the familiarity of typical vs atypical segments of language as far as sentences are concerned..and as for lone words, we may have never heard of them, or forgotten them, their meanings etc.
...mnnn....most influential, for whom? Other generative linguists? I would suggest, Cognitive/Construction grammars that reflect usage might be more relevant these days, but I'm an English teacher and we are confined to the stoneage pedagogical terms. No one has told us otherwise.
Oh my god, all this time I thought the question marks denoted questionable grammaticality. I'm so glad I got bored and watched this, I just wish I could have seen this when I was taking my intro syntax course.
I'm dian I'm going to present this topic as my task in linguistic, I do really want to read books, but, could you give a very simple explanation about what is syntax-generative grammar. Thank you
''The white board behind me.'' is imitation. The article 'the' was imitated thousands of times and the color 'white' was imitated thousands of times and so on.
Is there any other contemporary theory, claiming to be scientific, that receives as much attention in non-scientific media as Prof Chomsky's linguistics?
That’s not what I thought it was. So is John just putting stuff in the garage. I think I should be able to attach as many things to that activity. Hehe.
What Chomsky seemingly failed to see is that natural language productivity goes beyond recursion, so that no algorithm can generate all expressions of a natural language such as English. In other words, natural language is indefinitely extensible: www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=monist&id=monist_2013_0096_0002_0295_0308 Preprint available at philpapers.org
Das sollte auf Deutsch sein. Leider verliert die deutsche Sprache immer mehr an Relevanz, weil man immer weniger Deutsch in wichtigen Kontexten spricht. Diese sehr interessante Sprache wird in einigen Jahrzehnten nur noch eine Sprache sein, die man benutzt, um mit seiner Familie zu quatschen.
This guy is a good teacher
Thanks a lot.
Of course he is
This helped so much. How he managed to explain all this in 12 minutes is beyond me.
However, many things are passed over here.
Yeah!
There are several reasons why our videos are in English:
a) We are members of the English Department of Marburg University, our tuition language is English exclusively.
b) We want to address an international audience.
c) We have several international degree programs, e.g. the MA "Linguistics and Web Technology", with ca. 40 Students from 22 nations with more than 20 different mother tongues.
We don't think that our video channel is a suitable forum for the discussion of language policy.
This clear and concise teacher provides the best lessons I've ever encountered.
After finishing my MA program this year, I will do my best to translate as many of these e-lectures as i can into Arabic language (Allah willing) , thank you very much indeed, professor. ^__^
Great, we're looking forward to that and will acknoweldge your achievements.
My great pleasure, dear Prof. ^__^
aziz s.
it will be great ...
They are the best online material I have ever watched , so helpful
I am looking forward too
@@zainabahmed8709 check out my you tube videos. I'm a TEFL certified Native American Teacher in Egypt.
even a 90 min lecture couldn't make clear what you explained perfectly in 12 minutes, amazing
It is so far the clearest explanation of generative grammar I have seen
Really clear and explicit, I like his style of illustrating.
My favorite teacher on youtube but unfortunately there are not so many lectures on youtube
You´re an amazing and really good teacher! Thank you so much for this!!!!!!!
Thanks UA-cam. It’s aleays exactly what I will find interesting. Your software so advanced.
after many videos and books, I´ve finally understood generative grammar.
great video! thanks a lot - your clear and well structured manner of speech helped me a lot to understand the concept.
Hello! I really enjoyed the way you have explained this theory. What is more, your pronunciation is very clear ( I am from Argentina) and I did not have any kind of problems in understanding this video. Thank you so much for this. Regards!
Excellent e-lecture that I can use for my students in my Syntax classes.
If you are interested, you can use entire courses from the VLC (for free)! oer-vlc.de
Thanks to "our" Spanish translator Aurora G. from Lima in Peru, this E-Lecture now has optional Spanish subtitles.
Wow
Home work done thanks very much
I'm preparing a bachelor degree this year❤
You teach what books cannot achieve to teach. 🤗🌸
I'm elderly. I've looked up the word linguistics in the dictionary many times in my life. I hear it used often in science subjects and of course there is the popularity and personality figure of Noam Chomsky and others. But what did left wing politics have to do with language~!? So many questions. Why is it important~? And lately, what in the world does it have to do with AI~? I've honestly never understood it except to reason only that "it's the study of language" (and then wonder why it isn't termed "languaegology"?) THIS lecture brings to me an epiphany. I've learned more in these 11:22 minutes than in all my life about this subject. I am so happy right now. Thank you,
I think beyond the text, and context this lesson is useful for our students in their practices in real extra curriculum and also curriculum.
I don't think that Proxyy7 was wrong over the years. So please do not throw yourself into the next river! The question mark CAN be used for questionable grammaticality, for example, if native speakers are in doubt about the acceptance of a particular construction (see Quirk/Svartvik: Investigating linguistic acceptability). But is also often used if sentences are conceptually strange but grammatically correct, like Chomsk'y famous "? Flying planes can be dangerous." So we are both right.
Excellent video, very useful and clear enough. Thanks for sharing!
That was very informative. Thank you very much, sir. I find all of your e-lectures useful. Please keep uploading
Thank u so much for such an excellent topic ..excellent just because by ur way of delivering ..but I want to know do i have to explain the whole ps component and lexicon in gg ..as I m preparing for my examination
This presentation is very interesting. I am gonna present in a seminar. We get to choose a topic and I have chosen syntactic acquisition from nativist point of view. Do you happen to have videos related to my topic?
Thank you very much for your precious lecture and wish the best dear.
U r awesome sir.... Simply superb and explained neatly.
Beautiful. Yet, as a speaker of Arabic I can’t see what’s new about this module in comparison to what Sibawayh has already established (ca. 750 ad) even this categorization of grammatically correct but semantically odd is mentioned among four categories of speech in his book. Could someone explain what’s new about Chomsky’s theory?
I'm a Native American Teacher in Egypt check out my you tube video for REAL help.
does universal grammar as well as what was discussed here apply to all languages? even Chinese?
Could you please answer me about the question what is the relationship between between surface / deep structure from one hand and transformational grammar of the other hand?
U r the real professor...
Should I watch these lectures in VLC-Media-Player?
Really helpful
Learnt alot 👍
Wow. This is truly valuable content! Much appreciated.
Sincerally, so great ...professor.
really ammazing !! thank u sooo much , now i can understand what does generative grammar mean :)
Thanks for the video it helped me in such a great way.
Thank you now I have a glimpse of it It's interesting!
I would say that number of hypothetical sentences is infinite. But number of actual sentences (or even usable sentences) is finite (suntactically). Why? Length of the word will actually never go beyond certain bound. Length of sentence is actually limited (by time and comprehension abilities). Also number of actual words in the language is limited because even though new words are constantly created, some words are forgotten, human brains are limited. Duration of existence of humanity is probably limited too.
But if we are not looking at just the syntax/grammar, but also the association between the word and concept it points to, then we get sort of fuzzyness in the sense that the concept can be little bit different in everyones mind. So those would be infinite and uncountable.
Thank you very much for uploading this video!
Amazing ❤
I understand and create ill-formed sentences everyday as an English speaker living in Japan. Most, if not all the marked natural sentences my students create can be classified on a continuum of well-formed to illformed and contain atypical and typical form-meaning segments. But they all interpretable and reforming them into 'well-formed sentences' is no easy task. Attempt variations abound. Variations between native speakers abound. These are real problems for Generative Grammar and explain to me why Construction Grammar is so much more appealing these days. I can't say whether Construction Grammar can answer these questions either...but I suspect language is like a gas, not a solid matter, and defies the kinds of mechanical explanations Chomsky and his followers insist is a realistic possibility. We really only have a vague sense or intuition about the familiarity of typical vs atypical segments of language as far as sentences are concerned..and as for lone words, we may have never heard of them, or forgotten them, their meanings etc.
Thank you great Professor..
...mnnn....most influential, for whom? Other generative linguists? I would suggest, Cognitive/Construction grammars that reflect usage might be more relevant these days, but I'm an English teacher and we are confined to the stoneage pedagogical terms. No one has told us otherwise.
Oh my god, all this time I thought the question marks denoted questionable grammaticality. I'm so glad I got bored and watched this, I just wish I could have seen this when I was taking my intro syntax course.
I'm dian I'm going to present this topic as my task in linguistic, I do really want to read books, but, could you give a very simple explanation about what is syntax-generative grammar. Thank you
Wow thank you professor
Love the explanation , thank you very much
GREAT HELP INDEED...THANKS SO MUCH.
This guy is a good linguist
Great 👍 salute to you sir
''The white board behind me.'' is imitation. The article 'the' was imitated thousands of times and the color 'white' was imitated thousands of times and so on.
Well done and keep going
You are welcome
Danke für diese tolle Erklärung!
Thank you for this lecture. :)
Great teacher
Thank you very much indeed for the lesson!
Thank you soo much!!
Very clear! Thank you!
Awesome!!!
Thank you!! It's extremely helpful
Gracias por los subtítulos en español
Amazing!
Thank you very much
Is there any other contemporary theory, claiming to be scientific, that receives as much attention in non-scientific media as Prof Chomsky's linguistics?
That’s not what I thought it was. So is John just putting stuff in the garage. I think I should be able to attach as many things to that activity. Hehe.
This teacher has facial characteristics of Robin Williams. I kept expecting a funny face to be made.
Thank you!
Generative grammar, or how to bring a discipline back 50 years into devolution.
Thanks you so much
amazing
1:45, that elephant has been partaking in some questionable activities.
Thank you sir but I couldn't understand lexicon.
What Chomsky seemingly failed to see is that natural language productivity goes beyond recursion, so that no algorithm can generate all expressions of a natural language such as English. In other words, natural language is indefinitely extensible: www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=monist&id=monist_2013_0096_0002_0295_0308 Preprint available at philpapers.org
I love you.
The table sees army service each year. 👍
John put (threw) the car. 👍
❤
une traduction en français je vs en prie ! french translation pleaaaaaassssseeee
othmane tamoussit All we could provide is French subtitles. But someone has to do them.
From 2024 1st exam in ling hahaha😅
6:09 ohhh, the woman is the objest, i see
Das sollte auf Deutsch sein. Leider verliert die deutsche Sprache immer mehr an Relevanz, weil man immer weniger Deutsch in wichtigen Kontexten spricht. Diese sehr interessante Sprache wird in einigen Jahrzehnten nur noch eine Sprache sein, die man benutzt, um mit seiner Familie zu quatschen.