SYN109 - Phrase Structure I

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 сер 2024
  • Sentences can be analyzed into hierarchies of constituents. This E-lecture introduces the historical development of phrase structure systems from 1957 until today.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 60

  • @dychui
    @dychui 9 років тому +29

    most concise explanation of phase structure I have ever received, 4 years in grad school linguistics. Thanks!

    • @muhammedsaleem7219
      @muhammedsaleem7219 3 роки тому

      Sir you are explaining well but speak english simple thank you.

  • @iqbaljudge2509
    @iqbaljudge2509 8 років тому +7

    Excellent e- lectures! Prof. Jurgen Handke is very lucid ; his explanations and illustrations are clear and simple

  • @rosminazuchri9090
    @rosminazuchri9090 3 роки тому +1

    My name is Rosmina Zuchri from Indonesia Country. Yes, Professor. I will listen and watch your youtube about Phrase Structure I. Thanks

  • @isidorajaksicperovic5250
    @isidorajaksicperovic5250 6 років тому +1

    Thank you a lot for your great lessons! All years of studying became clear now. Your method of teaching is great - visual method with good examples and everything is clear and understandable. Thank you a lot. There are many books which I tried to read but full of different terms which I couldn't understand. But listening your lesson showed me this in interesting and easy way. Once more, thank you! :)

  • @kofiweidanso3763
    @kofiweidanso3763 10 років тому +1

    This video just saved me a rewrite, it just brought to bare all the myth around Syntax.... I am smiling now knowing i am just going to write the exams once... Thanks so much Sir !!

  • @felipealbertoarancibiavene6131
    @felipealbertoarancibiavene6131 2 роки тому

    7:30 the addition of P' was of deep interest in the X bar theory. If we consider the Prep phrase as an adjunct, we must have the element P' as X' turns into X' --adjunct of a either a verbal or adjectival form. Whoever came up with this, my respect.

  • @gabo6713
    @gabo6713 12 років тому

    Your e-lectures are great and very helpful for linguistis! You are far more clearer than my teachers! Thank you!

  • @gurminderkaur7545
    @gurminderkaur7545 6 років тому +2

    you have taught me much more than I wanted. Thanks man

  • @kaoday4200
    @kaoday4200 2 роки тому +1

    Many thanks for sharing greatest lesson

  •  4 роки тому +1

    Great! Thank you so much, Professor!

  • @ayshaali3190
    @ayshaali3190 10 років тому +3

    You're really a great teacher..
    Thanks a lot sir

  • @esseddikazmi3522
    @esseddikazmi3522 6 років тому

    thank you! it was lucid enough for me to understand how the syntactic structures of sentences has developed through time.

  • @AcheampongSamuelOwoahene
    @AcheampongSamuelOwoahene 10 років тому +5

    This was a very insightful lecture.

  • @marialuisalizarraga
    @marialuisalizarraga 10 років тому +1

    Awesome teacher. Thanks for the video!!

  • @krasssertyp
    @krasssertyp 12 років тому

    It really helped me to prepare my midterm test and you do a lot better than these bunch of fools called "academic tutors" on my college - full of expert knowledge but no clue how to explain it to us.
    GJob!

  • @sssalsera
    @sssalsera 6 років тому +2

    Vielen Dank!! Awesome teacher!!

  • @Artemirr
    @Artemirr 10 років тому +1

    The best way to learn grammar. Since the schools are all jacked, mostly you need a good parent. Find a female that goes to church or male. Language writing is also developed by how we speak and who we speak to. Online chatting or forum chatting changes how we write. My advice, find great literature pieces written well, not these hate speech books of late. Clarity is to the eye of the beholder that being the problem of teachers in the teaching department in that way we actually dumb down society. World is getting more intelligent in a different way. Its like a squeeze on society destroying other things. Buy a grammar work book from a college, that have extras, 20 -30 dollars work through it. Just practice writing properly over and over and over and over. Practice the tenses and all that over and over. Buy well written kids books and then go through them. (there shorter) Identify the subject, verb phrase and the nine parts of the language. It would be nice if there was a program that would make a game of that. In recognizing the 9 elements one then can better identify their problem like a math equation since the language really has less heart now. People are removing the heart of society for some squishy... orgy fest of flesh it seems. Because of foreign control they put a whip to the language but in reality, learning English in the layman world is very local. has its own nuisances. To me the builders are more important then wordsmiths and those that still from people through and b the use of words. That is called stealing.
    An example is 1mill for the ferry employee per/year. Versus 40-100k for a trades person per/year. That persons position is not even worth that much and I am sure any donkey could do it. Thus that position is better towards 80k even though that is high. Short term gains is destroying the public purse by thieves. The position of a well suited person could take 60 k a year for 10 -15 years and do wonderful job. Then we have 14 million saved and also gain of taxation back. that money can be pumped into infrastructure. language has a huge impact in corrupt politics. Robbing of the public purse is sad. Since 14 mill can advanced Canadians a lot faster. Instead, its actually murdering its citizens off slowly. Mishandling of education. No investment terrible immigration policies. Seriously people need to stay in their own countries and deal with their own place. Sedentary. That way they can defend their political voice. Running around and dancing for money is destroying the planet for an apparent better life. One thing I despise is a slave or lacky that does anything for money but has no quality behind their work. In that pretense, the government has gone wild. These individuals and families should in part have their assets liquidated from their families. Apparently be dishonorable is the new thing. There was a time one wrong crossed t, you would be stripped and seized of all things, in a manner of speaking. Law was a serious thing to keep just. For justice for some things I have read, indicates that stability is only ever from active participation in politics and constantly enforcing honest ideals and transparency because they are employed and empowered by the people in a parliament. They need to have their boots shaken sometimes of who really is the boss. At the moment Israel and the UN have huge sway over every country, this is no good for anyone. If you don't play either game they seem to dictate their demands to any nation. I am not entirely sure... Where the world is going , but I don't like my freedom being pushed around.
    I may have ranted and digressed from language, but... its important, but just remember language in truth is very open and creative. Acdemic writing is I AM A ROBOT. THIS IS MY JOURNAL. I HAVE NO THOUGHTS. THE SOURCES INDICATE FAILURE. AN EXAMPLE IS MY ROBOT SPEECH. THE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT SOURCES OF ACADEMIC CREDIBILITY ARE A SHELL GAME OF TIMES WITH NO EVIDENCE. IN MEANING THEY HAVE LOOP RESEARCH DOCUEMENTS WITH NO ACTUAL PLACE TO "PIN THAT TAIL ON THE DONKEY," WHEN TRACKING DOWN THE INFORMATION. IT IS IN MY BELIEF THROUGH THIS INVVESTIGATION WE LIVE IN SAD TIMES. STATUS QUOES. IF YOU BEHAVE LIKE AN IDIOT AND MAKE GENTALIA JOKES YOU CAN GET PAID MILLIONS. SIGH... IN A CAPTIAL REGIEME THIS INFLUENCES SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR AND MANY OTHER FACETS OF SOCIETY, COLLASPING THE FAMILY UNIT. THE HEART DIES...
    lol -
    honesty - become a builder - stay away from the shell and language games, it may make them rich but only by exploitation. Funny that the lowest should be the highest in meaning for builders and farmers, since it is them who feed the nations and build the homes. next is the exchange between those making tools. Who knows. I suppose its not that bad. I expect constantly better refinement... I don't like going backwards and that is what it feels, the lowering of the standard of living by far.

  • @Rosa-jg9yf
    @Rosa-jg9yf 4 роки тому +2

    After watching this video, I guess the way I analyze sentences is old but simple to me.

  • @xianyu101
    @xianyu101 3 роки тому

    Through this lecture,
    It seems that I could see my time in studying Syntax go over again, from undergraduate to phD……

  • @civsation
    @civsation 10 років тому

    Thank you! I am studying for an upcoming exam and these videos are quite helpful.

  • @masseatalib2251
    @masseatalib2251 10 років тому

    thank Dr for given me some insight about how to analyze sentence using tree diagram technique

  • @Muhammed_A-Hussein-DR
    @Muhammed_A-Hussein-DR 6 років тому +1

    I download most your lectures

  • @martitalop1
    @martitalop1 11 років тому

    excelente presentación, gracias por subirla y compartirla

  • @rosminazuchri636
    @rosminazuchri636 3 роки тому

    Prof DR.Jurgen Handke
    .thanks

  • @Chhoychanra99
    @Chhoychanra99 4 роки тому +2

    wow i like it

  • @silvr94
    @silvr94 11 років тому

    Absolutely fantastic! Thanks a lot! I have two questions:
    1) At around 09:20, do you mean complement instead of specifier for simple phrases? Isn't a complement the sister of a head and a specifier sister of an x̅?
    2) Will there be a lecture on X-Bar-Syntax on UA-cam?
    Thank you!

  • @user-xi6gm4dk2y
    @user-xi6gm4dk2y 2 роки тому

    I have long preceived the only theory on tree diagram of syntax is X-bar before I was under this professor's tutelage.

  • @MouridEnglish
    @MouridEnglish 7 років тому

    Really Interesting. Thank You So Much.

  • @viktorlai5171
    @viktorlai5171 3 роки тому

    banger video my lad

  • @dimitardachkinov2271
    @dimitardachkinov2271 7 років тому +1

    Thanks for the video :)

  • @Temujin216
    @Temujin216 4 роки тому

    Este tema es muy interesante, gracias por su buena pronunciación.

  • @lahiri12debsmita82
    @lahiri12debsmita82 4 роки тому +1

    excellent..

  • @mebeasensei
    @mebeasensei 9 років тому

    Thanks.
    I have a small peeve, however.
    Why do syntax or grammar lectures that speak to only one version of grammar - in this case Chomskian grammar - assume to be general or universal? I thought I would get a history of grammar but only got Chomsky?

  • @darkhorse21xx
    @darkhorse21xx 3 роки тому

    Had to bust a gut when he introduced Ray Jackendoff @ 4:50.

  • @jackiejayz2001
    @jackiejayz2001 11 років тому

    U helped me on homework,thanx

  • @banharnwitayarut7105
    @banharnwitayarut7105 5 років тому

    Help please, I don't understand why DP of V' not to the one or two rules states that X' generates X'

  • @user-qz3fg6wq5b
    @user-qz3fg6wq5b 8 років тому +1

    Thanx alot sir..

  • @orveasna
    @orveasna 10 років тому

    Thanks it's really useful.

  • @sanawarhusain6055
    @sanawarhusain6055 9 років тому

    thank you your helpful phrase

  • @user-bn4bp5my1e
    @user-bn4bp5my1e 8 років тому

    That's a nice one!

  • @FedwaEz
    @FedwaEz 10 років тому

    Thanks it's really helpful

  • @cleberferrari3192
    @cleberferrari3192 10 років тому

    Hello, I received a proposal for a course that ensures fluency in six months. I really need to learn English (conversation) and the proposal is good, but it's too high, I can not afford.
    The course has good feedback, so I think to be honest.
    Submissions are to be taught explicit "5 logical structures" (to form phrases), vocabulary, exercises to apply logic structures and conversation with a native speaker.
    My question is, what should these 5 logical structures? Is there any method to teach English to adults based on logic?

    • @bonbonpony
      @bonbonpony 5 років тому

      Step 1: When speaking English, think in English, not in your native language.

  • @cedricyongcheolchang719
    @cedricyongcheolchang719 9 років тому

    Thanks a lot!

  • @kamranyaseen3417
    @kamranyaseen3417 7 років тому +1

    Plz make a tree diagram for
    what is your name?

  • @dimitardachkinov2271
    @dimitardachkinov2271 7 років тому +1

    I thought they are trying to simplify it throughout the years tho

  • @rossnoltag3425
    @rossnoltag3425 6 років тому

    Great lecture! i wounder is the actualy a class there.

    • @oer-vlc
      @oer-vlc  6 років тому +1

      Thanks for your "like". On the Virtual Linguistics Campus (free registration), you can find 6 free open online courses, the so-called pMOOCs.

  • @fenoii
    @fenoii 12 років тому

    thank you so much ^^

  • @mohammeda.5488
    @mohammeda.5488 10 років тому

    What is the difference between a "spec" and a "specifier"? I am not sure why you named the complement label a "specifier" in today's system?

  • @orveasna
    @orveasna 10 років тому

    i would like to became a writing skill but i'm poor in grammar usage who guys show me the best way.

  • @ayshaali3190
    @ayshaali3190 10 років тому +2

    Difficult 😒

  • @lepredator189
    @lepredator189 7 років тому +1

    Fucking complex stuff, I'd rather stick to Halliday's SFL.

  • @TheLuminousCleric
    @TheLuminousCleric 11 років тому

    It's like doing math...

  • @TheMaths4u
    @TheMaths4u 12 років тому

    add more

  • @hafezfahim5054
    @hafezfahim5054 3 роки тому

    Yuuii