War Thunder - HOW will the SOVIET TECH TREE (GROUND) look like in the FUTURE? T-14? T-15?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 чер 2024
  • Talking about the Soviet Tech tree and the FUTURE of it!
    Join our Discord: / discord
    Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @matawg
    Patreon: / matawg
    Ajude o canal com o PIX de qualquer valor: matawg@hotmail.com
    Donate with Paypal: www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted... My Secondary GTA Channel: / @thatmatt-kq9uu
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 238

  • @chesterhiggens
    @chesterhiggens 4 місяці тому +47

    I’d like to see some premium additions changed or maybe even tech tree, object 195 I believe (t14 prototype in 90s) and maybe the “black eagle” t80 prototype.

    • @STRYKER1467
      @STRYKER1467 4 місяці тому +2

      That would be the T-80UM-2 obj640(Black Eagle) some people still think the one with drozd in war thunder is the black eagle but they have similar names but are completely different, theres two more a T-80UM(thats a modern T-80U) & T-80UM-1-Bars and the other UM2 is ingame already, and no it can never be easy with soviet tanks they are always difficult to designate.

  • @chaluznik2206
    @chaluznik2206 4 місяці тому +30

    I would really love to see the T-72B3M obr.2022 in the game, but i would put it as a folder vehicle under the T72B3 we have in game. Its just an uparmored B3 with shit ton of ERA slapped on it with commanders thermals.

    • @olgatd9168
      @olgatd9168 4 місяці тому +5

      Not only that, New gunner sight, Metal nets on the front turret added ERA-Kontakt-5 on gun Mantlet and way better reparability Edit: also ERA on the back of the turret.

    • @chaluznik2206
      @chaluznik2206 4 місяці тому

      @@olgatd9168 Thats what i said, added shit ton of ERA making the tank pretty much imune to heat threats. The sight should be the same but with a closing door to cover it.

  • @Migger141
    @Migger141 4 місяці тому +30

    The t15 is based on the Armata chassis as it is supposedly the basis for new Russian vehicles

    • @Nero-Caesar
      @Nero-Caesar 4 місяці тому

      was about to comment that

    • @DerDrecksack87
      @DerDrecksack87 4 місяці тому

      Uh didnt know about the T15 until now, everybody laughed at me a year or two ago when i said that the T14 is just a testbed but it was shown for PR reasons, in sovjet times it would have gotten some object-Nr designnation and would probably never left the testing grounds.

    • @paintbrushdaddy3249
      @paintbrushdaddy3249 2 місяці тому

      @@Nero-Caesar The T-15 concept of a heavy IFV is derived from design of the BTR-T vehicle (based on the T-55 chassis) that never entered military service

    • @paintbrushdaddy3249
      @paintbrushdaddy3249 2 місяці тому

      The T-15 concept of a heavy IFV is derived from design of the BTR-T vehicle (based on the T-55 chassis) that never entered military service

    • @Nero-Caesar
      @Nero-Caesar 2 місяці тому +1

      @@paintbrushdaddy3249well the current T-15 is on the armata chassis

  • @Frost_x_NB
    @Frost_x_NB 4 місяці тому +17

    FINALLY!!!!! I LOVE THIS SERIES OF VIDEO! Please do more on these Mat

  • @MestruTrmonen
    @MestruTrmonen 4 місяці тому +27

    also others vehicles that could be added are some series of objects like (Object 195,Object 292,Object 277), also the airborne vehicles series like bmd-1, bmd-2, bmd-3 and some serius artillery like the 2S19 Mista-s

    • @Em_Youl
      @Em_Youl 4 місяці тому +4

      And Tos-1

    • @mr.waffentrager4400
      @mr.waffentrager4400 4 місяці тому +2

      Man i want a 130mm gun in the tech tree Right now , i don't have 279 or the money for it.

    • @MestruTrmonen
      @MestruTrmonen 4 місяці тому +2

      @@Em_Youl before that the good old grad

    • @MestruTrmonen
      @MestruTrmonen 4 місяці тому +1

      @@mr.waffentrager4400 im waiting for the object 292 basicaly a t80b with a 150mm smothbore gun

    • @Em_Youl
      @Em_Youl 4 місяці тому

      @@MestruTrmonen sorry whats grad?

  • @chadthe_chad6138
    @chadthe_chad6138 4 місяці тому +11

    can actualy add another t--90m the 2022 version , it has better reverse speed and more armor at side )

    • @troy_pl1138
      @troy_pl1138 4 місяці тому +1

      yeah more russian op tanks vs abrams without armor xd

    • @tankistrazumist
      @tankistrazumist 4 місяці тому +3

      All T-90M have the same reverse speed.

    • @user-jc2in3cp3g
      @user-jc2in3cp3g 4 місяці тому

      they could make american tanks better armor and it wouldnt matter, american teams are awful@@troy_pl1138

    • @jPlanerv2
      @jPlanerv2 4 місяці тому

      2022 does not have better reverse speed it was only an idea no prototype or even paper project was made, same with Hard kill aps its not put on any production variants so it should not have it in game same as leo2PSO has no better front plate but could have

  • @IllustriousUnknown416
    @IllustriousUnknown416 4 місяці тому +5

    Soviet TT also lacks T-54A/B, T-62 (mod. 1972), T-64A (1972 or 1980), a true T-80BV*, maybe a T-80UD (Diesel engine), not to mention all the BA series o armored car from the 30s and 40s, a 1945 variant of the T-34-85 (with the smoke barrel) BMD-1, BMD-2, T-90 (mod. 1992), give the “Kontakt-1” modification for the T-72A (making it a T-72AV, like the T-64BV)
    * the current T-80B that we have is NOT a T-80BV. It’s just a T-80B retrofitted with K-1. True T-80BV has the same chassis of the T-80U and can fire the better “reflex” ATGM. Also, remove T-80B’s fake thermals, cuz if that’s ok, give the Abrams their DU hull

    • @Corefailure24
      @Corefailure24 4 місяці тому

      T62Ms and all older T80s have received thermals mostly irl so no on the T80BV..take thermals away from it and its gonna be 110% worthless

    • @mr.waffentrager4400
      @mr.waffentrager4400 4 місяці тому +2

      I think t-80b was also retrofitted with thermals later.

  • @krin9437
    @krin9437 4 місяці тому +10

    I think if we do see the 2022 versions of the t80bvm and t72b3 then they should come equipped with the arena-m active protection system. If not them, at least a more modernized t-90m

    • @wifi_soldier5076
      @wifi_soldier5076 4 місяці тому +3

      Also with the 3BM59 depleated uranium shell with 630mm PEN

    • @DerDrecksack87
      @DerDrecksack87 4 місяці тому

      ​@@wifi_soldier5076 i think they keep the 3BM59 back for a while, it might get tandem introduced with the various other DU rounds for the US, Germany & GB + the variatons of those for the other nations, imagine the temper tantrum if the 3BM59 is introduced 3 months before the others get it...

  • @MDSR17455
    @MDSR17455 4 місяці тому +3

    You are missing a lot of APS equipped T 72, 80 and 90 series of MBTs

  • @Nigh-T
    @Nigh-T 4 місяці тому +12

    you guys should do one with France next A lot of people I feel like think there is almost nothing else to add but in reality they can add a good amount

    • @Pioneer_DE
      @Pioneer_DE 4 місяці тому +1

      Same with german air, sure gaijin would have to resort to some prototypes but still

    • @splendid9910
      @splendid9910 4 місяці тому +1

      ​@@Pioneer_DE personally, I'm waiting on the ICE modifications, they're due to come before something like the Eurofighter surely.

    • @Pioneer_DE
      @Pioneer_DE 4 місяці тому +1

      Same, but first they'd need to decompress the BR's, I feel at 11.3/11.7 (where the Phantom would sit), it would get crushed by other planes, unless it would carry the aim 120s@@splendid9910

  • @STRYKER1467
    @STRYKER1467 4 місяці тому +5

    T-62M (2022) is something i would want for sure.
    T-55M6 would be pretty much like the chinese Type96B an interesting vehicle a cheap modernization.
    I gotta say you made a pretty good list but there are far for T-90Ms than just that one from 2017 we have in the game, they could be foldered that would be obr 2020 2022 & this new one lets call its obr 2023 with the new reverse speed everyone is talking about, as for BTRs you forgot the VPK-7829 Bumerang while everyone knows the T-14 but very few actually know The T-15 but theres also the Bumerang which almost no one knows just like the others its built in small numbers. Not really needed but i need to mention them too the Gaz Tigr 2975 and its variants there are 1-2 which could be added into war thunder that would be the one with the modern russian 30mm autocannon the kornet atgm launcher.

  • @alphaOne826
    @alphaOne826 4 місяці тому +18

    Can u do the same with the german ground tech tree pls?

    • @Niko_rj
      @Niko_rj 4 місяці тому

      Leo 2A7+, Leo 2A8, and then KF 51.

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 4 місяці тому +2

      yeah it's in the pipeline, i've just been too demotivated to make more trees for awhile now.

    • @alphaOne826
      @alphaOne826 4 місяці тому

      @@Niko_rj there definitly more even just at the MBT's there's more

    • @thatoneguy1741
      @thatoneguy1741 4 місяці тому +1

      Just more leopards with small variations between them, worthy of another 400k+ RP tank to grind?

    • @Niko_rj
      @Niko_rj 4 місяці тому

      @abdixz609 I think this tank is for France, tank based on the Leopard, since Germany already has its own design like KF 51...

  • @wholesome3759
    @wholesome3759 4 місяці тому +1

    Gr8 vid. Was hoping to see the Obj. 640, lol.

  • @ser43_OLDC
    @ser43_OLDC 4 місяці тому +6

    Mat how the Tor M2 that has 16 missiles with 18km range missiles be before the osa that has 6 missiles with 15km in the latest variant?
    Also skipping any more modern variant of the S1 the Tor m2 should be the end of the line

  • @degenerat3380
    @degenerat3380 4 місяці тому +3

    16:47 Karrar it is a T-72S with a welded turret, kontakt-1 on the hull with a high probability that contact 1 is also on the turret this tank does not deserve the 8th rank, the Persians wanted this tank to look modern, but its modern appearance is where its features end.

  • @dominuslogik484
    @dominuslogik484 4 місяці тому +1

    I love how they add things to pretty much every tech tree that are brand new and some that haven't even been put into service yet but they added an old M1 Abrams as the "top Tier".

  • @rivefall6845
    @rivefall6845 4 місяці тому

    Some very interesting vehicles, would love to see some of these extra light vehicles and atgm carriers. Would like to see a tor in the lineup too but understand for balance maybe not best to have loads of the best AA vehicles in one tree because they’ll just fill lineups completely

  • @hev4892
    @hev4892 4 місяці тому +1

    The T-90MS might be a rank 7 ( maybe 8 ) premium

  • @grimlockamusking9484
    @grimlockamusking9484 4 місяці тому

    I feel like we'll probably end up seeing some of these vehicles in the future help some of the ones on this list will most likely be added soon due to that massive Gap they now have in the tech tree

  • @kampsie1841
    @kampsie1841 4 місяці тому +3

    I'm dissapointed gaijin added the Pantsir in truck and not it's tracked version. You can barley Drive it anywhere

  • @matasfxx5137
    @matasfxx5137 4 місяці тому +2

    maybe you could find some time before console pack sales end to do a review on Mig 23 ml in the same form as F_4E?

  • @WarheadWarden
    @WarheadWarden 4 місяці тому +1

    Well don't forget about T-72M4CZ that looks super strong with even better APFSDS than top tier Russia.
    1000 HP engine electric drivetrain with 60 forward 20 backwards

  • @nemanjalackovic2288
    @nemanjalackovic2288 4 місяці тому

    While the M-84AS1 is severely upgraded version of the M-84, it gets even better with the M-84AS2 that came out in 2020/21 which is an even further modernisation. Basically both modernisations were done in parallel with one another with the AS2 serving as a tank platoon commander tank. I saw the AS1 version live and it's hell of a good looking tank, it's basically the better T-72B3

  • @SwithinHalee
    @SwithinHalee 4 місяці тому +2

    I like the Overall ideas of this vid about the future of the USSR tech tree. But for the premiums at Rank 8 is debateable, for me i don't want to see a wallet warrior to die once and left with no contribution to the team, play with skill to reach the top, not your wallet

  • @sergeantrickroll9281
    @sergeantrickroll9281 4 місяці тому

    I can already hear the never ending arguments over the t 14 and whether its too op or the vise versa

  • @nazimm4475
    @nazimm4475 4 місяці тому

    we could see the BMPT-62 as an event vehicule or premium

  • @__sscorpion__
    @__sscorpion__ 4 місяці тому +1

    Still missing: object 195, object 477, object 640, T-90 Burlak, T-80 Burlak, T-90M 2022, Pantsir SM.
    And Tor-M2 will be very effective, it is unclear why it comes after Tunguska and not Patsir

  • @JameWeseman-zm1ij
    @JameWeseman-zm1ij 4 місяці тому +1

    I would like to see how the t-14 would drive

  • @dylane8635
    @dylane8635 4 місяці тому

    hi. love your videos. are you gonna do italy ground tech tree?

  • @SakuraDaimyo
    @SakuraDaimyo 4 місяці тому

    what program are you using to do this?

  • @rickyisgigant2877
    @rickyisgigant2877 4 місяці тому

    on the list u could ad the t64bm (t64 with contact-5)

  • @goldenking4460
    @goldenking4460 4 місяці тому

    I wish every vehicle you said in rank 8 would be in war thunder soon

  • @adriandumbrava221
    @adriandumbrava221 4 місяці тому +1

    T-64BV Bulat after T-64A/B?

  • @Kaskad_22350
    @Kaskad_22350 4 місяці тому

    Where's the T-80UD for the main branch and the T-80U-M1 "Bars"?

  • @splendid9910
    @splendid9910 4 місяці тому +3

    I wish for the Yugoslav techtree to come to the game as a way to put eastern european and more neiche vehicles into the game, but my main confusion around this speculation is about the BMD series of vehicles, why only add the 4M and not find a way to get the other ones in?

    • @kajmak64bit76
      @kajmak64bit76 4 місяці тому +2

      Most likely coming this year bro
      I've seen evidence of it... back in i think Update Red Skies devserver
      They removed Fury Biplane from the files but it had a tag ( YU ) which is obviously for YUgoslavia..
      Basically they removed Yugoslav tech tree plane from the files for some reason ( we probably didn't use Fury's )
      So to me... this is clear prood they are working in it
      Even bigger and even clearer proof they are working on Yugo tech tree is that they added pretty much all of Serbo-Croatian voice-lines into the game... and you can even use them right now
      Set your game to Serbian... then change the crew language to Game Options so it will only play the language you set the game to be
      And it just works lol

    • @splendid9910
      @splendid9910 4 місяці тому +1

      @@kajmak64bit76 Can't wait for all of that to happen so that I can take out some of our stuff out to see how it fares against everything else, it'll be very fun. As for the crew voicelines yes I'm aware they did add them in, but around the time when Ixua strike came out I was almost certain that the new nation they were teasing was Yugoslavia and eastern europe before the trailer came out lol.

    • @splendid9910
      @splendid9910 4 місяці тому

      One more thing I forgot was the T-90 Burlak, that thing is an interesting modification, it can be put in as a premium later down the line.

    • @DerDrecksack87
      @DerDrecksack87 4 місяці тому +1

      ​@@splendid9910 they could do it as Wargame European Escalation/Red Dragon did: you can either have a nation pack where eastern europe, western europe, norad and so are all mixed together (but take longer to grind) or chose single nations that are much faster to grind because less vehicles, but have less to choose from. I am happy either way if new nation tec trees come into game, especially the jugoslav one, lot of interesting & out of the box thinking makes them often special.

    • @RustyBear
      @RustyBear 4 місяці тому

      Eastern Europe tech tree would be amazing.

  • @patrickmalzin
    @patrickmalzin 4 місяці тому

    maybe i missed something, but, why the S-300 was not mentioned?

  • @greentiger9281
    @greentiger9281 3 місяці тому

    Everybody forgot 2S19 Msta-S

  • @garrettobrien5197
    @garrettobrien5197 4 місяці тому

    You should start putting watermarks on these. Ive seen so many people on tiktok copying these images and claiming them as their own

  • @Hyper_1989
    @Hyper_1989 4 місяці тому +2

    No object 195 :(

  • @armanboncales2928
    @armanboncales2928 4 місяці тому

    i think before t14 there be a t90m 2023 better reverse speed etc

  • @Wiesel1a4
    @Wiesel1a4 3 місяці тому

    Completely unrelated, but I stumbled upon a Russian military defense forum, they basically discuss Russian weapons and other Russian military things, and I saw an interesting discussion “T-14 Armata discussion 5”, they were basically talking about the high velocity and the low velocity 57mm cannons, similar to the one mounted on the 2s38, and I saw a couple images and sources of the Kurganets-25, and T-15 having 3bm76, it’s really interesting since I also saw a couple of vehicles very similar to the 2s38 but with even more modernized equipment and plans of integrating 3bm76 on those vehicles, I don’t know how much of it is true since it is a Russian sided forum with lots of English speakers.

  • @jaf8016
    @jaf8016 4 місяці тому +1

    how about the object 195 the predecessor of the armata t14

  • @ZigaZagu
    @ZigaZagu 4 місяці тому

    Crazy that they havent added BRDM-2 yet

  • @Armata6348
    @Armata6348 4 місяці тому

    Don't forget the VPK 7829

  • @wing0291
    @wing0291 4 місяці тому

    They need to bring the terminator bmp tank

  • @5gurus-bimiseveriz
    @5gurus-bimiseveriz 4 місяці тому

    I would really like to see T-90ms as a premium

  • @dyddsko
    @dyddsko 4 місяці тому +1

    I actually don't understand why they haven't added the BMPT-72 Terminator yet, there's no reason for Gaijin not to add it, it would fit in perfectly in the Russian tech tree

    • @DerDrecksack87
      @DerDrecksack87 4 місяці тому

      Because you can already hear everybody crying abouut a twin 30mm with ATGMs i mean many still cry because of the BMP2M, they would have to put it at 11.3 or 11.7 and thats a hard place for any IFV, the T72A/B chasis might be paper at that tier so it has nothing going for it that the BMP2M or BMP3/BMD does not already offer, but yeah it would be nice. I would welcome more IFVs for nations who dont have much of any first though.

    • @jPlanerv2
      @jPlanerv2 4 місяці тому

      Problem is how gaijin models unmanned turrets in game, they work fine for lighter vehicles since you can overpressure them or cook ammo, but for T14 and Terminator vehicles that are heavier armored and cant just get overpressured with Heat/HE you cant do anything to them right now. They need to add some mechanics to counter them, IRL direct hit to turret face on T14 or terminator would mean whole turret is out of action but in WT shell would just go through it while doing no damage as we saw this in futuristic event

  • @Aesa1224
    @Aesa1224 4 місяці тому

    Please make it for the Turkish Tech Tree.

  • @mihu2468
    @mihu2468 4 місяці тому +1

    do a japanese or sweden tech tree in futurate

  • @pandan5837
    @pandan5837 4 місяці тому

    i think they will extend br to 14 and rank X instead rank VIII only

  • @mr.phileo9699
    @mr.phileo9699 4 місяці тому

    I want the BMD 2M

  • @DevilBabyJelly1
    @DevilBabyJelly1 4 місяці тому +1

    what about Object 195 or Object 292?

  • @Ruskipatzan907
    @Ruskipatzan907 4 місяці тому

    Why there is no Bumerang ifv?

  • @AZAD_420
    @AZAD_420 4 місяці тому

    yes

  • @matejulicnik163
    @matejulicnik163 4 місяці тому

    Where is the VPK-7829 Bumerang ?

  • @RenanSAbreu
    @RenanSAbreu 4 місяці тому

    We need more lower tier SPAAs. There's some HUGE gaps, some AAs being way too weak or just useless.

  • @loner1512
    @loner1512 4 місяці тому

    Imagine Nona has drone 😂

  • @ploinefost9468
    @ploinefost9468 4 місяці тому

    No object 195 and Sosna 😔

  • @Dark_flame_
    @Dark_flame_ 3 місяці тому

    T14 will be so much better ingame than irl because BiasThunder

  • @Milaueu
    @Milaueu 4 місяці тому

    It is unlikely that guided missile carriers will be higher than the Chrysanthemum-S. 9k33 wasp will be worse than the 2s6 Tunguska. Prototypes of the T 14 from the 80s are not presented (In the 80s in the USSR they realized that the concept of the T72 with a carousel automatic loader had outlived itself). These Are object 490A "Rebel", Object 477 "Boxer", Object 477A "Hammer", Object 477A1 "Note", Development Work 490B "Belka". There are no some modifications of the T-80 such as the Object 640 "Black Eagle" and the variant with the "Burlak" tower. There are no variants of the T-90 with dynamic protection "Arena" BMP-3 with the same.

  • @BlobBoi
    @BlobBoi 13 днів тому

    When will gaijin at 5th gen fighters?

  • @USAGERMANYM1A22A7
    @USAGERMANYM1A22A7 3 місяці тому

    Could u do future german ground tree

  • @MongooseLetLoose
    @MongooseLetLoose 4 місяці тому

    link to post maybe?

  • @Bandit0313
    @Bandit0313 4 місяці тому +1

    I’m done with trying to care about only what our thoughts are on what’s going to be added in the future. Until they officially announce vehicles, I simply don’t care anymore and just gonna play the game.

  • @xxxdarkhexxx2180
    @xxxdarkhexxx2180 3 місяці тому

    If there is BMP-23 (Bulgarian) Where could it be?

  • @Niko_rj
    @Niko_rj 4 місяці тому +1

    About T72B3M 2022, its just T72B3M with more armor(no commander thermals).
    Not to be confused with more cheap T72B3M (2023) worse thermals (still 2 gen), more armor, engine probably 1000hp, and probably no new fire control system (fast turret rotation), Because this is a quick and cheap modernization of the T72B.

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 4 місяці тому

      Yeah I told him in private after he released the video that the T-72B3M 2022 doesn't have a CITV, only the VDV's T-72B3's do and they all got destroyed.

    • @Niko_rj
      @Niko_rj 4 місяці тому +1

      @lazylime8046 VDV T72B3? The commander's thermals was present only on the Biathlon T72, some of them were donated to the army

  • @top10idk
    @top10idk 4 місяці тому

    I want object 195 and T80UM2 Black Eagle,not that one with APS

  • @SorrwitPoothong
    @SorrwitPoothong 4 місяці тому

    Future Germany tech tree pls

  • @mich421
    @mich421 4 місяці тому

    That t 55 looks broken and also has kontact 5

  • @denisivanov1140
    @denisivanov1140 4 місяці тому

    What about t100 ogre?

  • @Niko_rj
    @Niko_rj 4 місяці тому +7

    TOR M2 😭
    China has TOR M1 at rank 8... TOR M2 got thermals, 16 missiles instead of 8, more range, faster missiles...
    Gaijin directly said that they will not add TOR 2 yet, because due to the missile engine, which operates throughout the entire flight of the missilw, it can turn at 16 km (max range) much better than Pantsir S1 missile. Like if pantsir missile can turn 5G on 16km, TOR 30G (max G) and it has more missiles than S1 (12 missiles). just like the missile speed, it flies at 1000 m/s, but it will fly at this speed for all 16 km. that is much better.
    Also you forgot Pantsir SM, 40km missile range, 75km radar.

    • @rastohurray4945
      @rastohurray4945 4 місяці тому +1

      It may come along with fox 3 missile update...after jets get fox 3s AAs would also get similary capable missiles

    • @ser43_OLDC
      @ser43_OLDC 4 місяці тому

      Like you said, the Tor perform better against maneuvering targets than the S1

    • @Niko_rj
      @Niko_rj 4 місяці тому

      @ser43_oldc86 much better. in the game too, TOR M1 the best at it. Although, as I know, in the game TOR M1 got unrealistic over G, I didn’t look, maybe they gave some other missiles... but like VT 1 missiles got buff

    • @ser43_OLDC
      @ser43_OLDC 4 місяці тому

      ​@@Niko_rj The missile is stated to have 30g of overload thx to the thrust vectoring. 30-42 doesnt change much but yes the old variant has a slight buffed overload

  • @ThunderHaus-vo2ns
    @ThunderHaus-vo2ns 4 місяці тому

    Do Sweden

  • @M_Hitman_H
    @M_Hitman_H 4 місяці тому +1

    buk system would be insane

  • @Destroyah-754
    @Destroyah-754 4 місяці тому

    Dev Server?

  • @terminator.09
    @terminator.09 4 місяці тому +1

    BTW you frogot OG M-84 + thear is AS2 coming in 2024 end croatian M-95. just saying yugoslavia (serbia/croatia) cod have thear own tech tree

  • @Em_Youl
    @Em_Youl 4 місяці тому

    Where Tos-1's?

  • @italo_9687
    @italo_9687 4 місяці тому

    Hi Great video pls for China

  • @SwithinHalee
    @SwithinHalee 4 місяці тому +1

    Isn't there a T-90M provy with hardkill APS? or is it just me?

    • @epicgamer6419
      @epicgamer6419 4 місяці тому

      Yes it's the t90ms wich is the export version of the regular t90m. It has the afganit hard kill active protection system

    • @SwithinHalee
      @SwithinHalee 4 місяці тому

      @@epicgamer6419 ok, thx 👍🏻

  • @Christph-vb1gn
    @Christph-vb1gn 4 місяці тому +6

    I just want the black eagle with the 152mm gun

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 4 місяці тому

      It never had a 152mm, only the standard 125mm.

    • @Hyper_1989
      @Hyper_1989 4 місяці тому

      Object 195 had 152mm

    • @luigidomenicopace1329
      @luigidomenicopace1329 4 місяці тому +1

      me too, new turret design with a back autoloader instead of the classic carusel...it would be terrific

  • @playandre
    @playandre 4 місяці тому

    e os tank leve no toptier??
    foi pro beleléu kkkkk

  • @InterstellarTaco
    @InterstellarTaco 4 місяці тому +1

    Im sure that the T14, a tank that barely exits and is really just an object Russia brags about will totally be balanced within the confines of the game.

    • @mr.waffentrager4400
      @mr.waffentrager4400 4 місяці тому +5

      My brother they exist about 20 times more than challenger 3.

    • @InterstellarTaco
      @InterstellarTaco 4 місяці тому

      @mr.waffentrager4400 the Challenger 3 isn't some broken vehicle in game like I'm sure the T14 will be.

    • @juh2445
      @juh2445 4 місяці тому

      ​@@InterstellarTaco chally 3 isnt in game yet so we dont know

    • @InterstellarTaco
      @InterstellarTaco 4 місяці тому +1

      @@juh2445 when has Britain received a broken vehicle besides the Harrier GR1? And the Challenger 3 TD is in the game right now. Lol

    • @juh2445
      @juh2445 4 місяці тому +1

      @@InterstellarTaco its a challanger 3 prototype, which is just a chally 2 with a german 120, the real challanger 3 isnt in game yet

  • @0_MoWe_0
    @0_MoWe_0 4 місяці тому

    mortarr...... MORTAL

  • @zildog6850
    @zildog6850 3 місяці тому

    👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

  • @logigic-ob9pq
    @logigic-ob9pq 4 місяці тому

    Can u pls do poland?

  • @wangl601
    @wangl601 3 місяці тому

    There are literally hundreds of soviet/russian vehicles which can be added into br 7.0-9.7. Unfortunately gaijin almost gave up adding mid-tier things cus they are not hyped enough to make quick money. Old players, many of them are already left; newbies, many of them are not even into military history before playing wt. D-54,what is that? D-68, what is that? Zalo-S, what soviet got wheeled tonk design?

  • @black_wolf1664
    @black_wolf1664 4 місяці тому

    Do the same with France and some other country

  • @Son-03
    @Son-03 4 місяці тому

    needs QoL updates

  • @vladislavovi44
    @vladislavovi44 4 місяці тому

    You are wrong the T-15 has squad seats. And also the t-15 is not based on t-55 it is based on the t-14

  • @Roi_D_Pirates
    @Roi_D_Pirates 4 місяці тому

    Actually an Iranian tech tree could be nice

  • @MSGtJimator
    @MSGtJimator 4 місяці тому

    Dude, it’s pronounced mortar with an R at the end. Not mortal. That’s all of us, we are all mortals. So very different meaning.

  • @ionutbogdanchis7250
    @ionutbogdanchis7250 4 місяці тому +1

    Umm sorry but where is the T-95?

  • @drsebo3303
    @drsebo3303 4 місяці тому

    t90 ms

  • @mrwolf2120
    @mrwolf2120 4 місяці тому +1

    I would love to see an actual Artillery tank. That uses the same system as the mortars.
    you open ur map and click where u want to fire. but its not as accruate unless u upgrate ur crew.
    and on top of that u are kinda depented on other players marking and scouting other tanks.
    this game can add a lot of new cool things. we just have to wait and see what they will do.

    • @mich421
      @mich421 4 місяці тому +2

      It would be nice if the artillery did what it was designed for

    • @Bandit0313
      @Bandit0313 4 місяці тому +1

      I’ve been asking for an actual indirect fire system in this game for a long time now lol

  • @MSK1147
    @MSK1147 4 місяці тому +2

    you missing Ukrainian t84

  • @htanpiasmenotorakounis-jz1zb
    @htanpiasmenotorakounis-jz1zb 4 місяці тому +2

    These videos are very interesting, pls do america next.

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 4 місяці тому

      America's air and ground trees are already done.

    • @troy_pl1138
      @troy_pl1138 4 місяці тому

      but movie about american's potencially tech tree was some months ago, before gaijin gave 8th era, so this movie should be get upgrade@@lazylime8046

  • @chrisbacon3071
    @chrisbacon3071 4 місяці тому

    13:30 call it what it is... a cope cage.

  • @jfd9616
    @jfd9616 3 місяці тому

    Personally, imo we got too many t72s 🤣

  • @notafrog2040
    @notafrog2040 4 місяці тому

    DO CHINA NEXT, and then Japan!

  • @tomsk
    @tomsk 4 місяці тому

    Then I want new Germans Panther, Leopard 2A7HU and Leopard 2A8, but who plays for terrosit state anymore?

  • @troy_pl1138
    @troy_pl1138 4 місяці тому +1

    Make potentially Polish tech tree GB and AB :)