'Worlds most successful air to air missile' the hit ratio (according to the maker is .79 per missile fired!) since the original doctrine was to fire TWO per engagement, you fire two you are just about GUARANTEED a kill! I tried the simulator that Raytheon made which has a battery powered cart with a missile dummy on it (with guidance steering it), they would hand you a lit cigarette, all you had to do was stay away from it for 30 seconds in an aircraft hangar (and you would win a nice $50) last I heard with the aim-9L they had given away less than $500 in 25 years!
@@BalticaBeer by the time they got to the 9mike they had basically given it the brain of a cutting horse, it would cut corners and the cpu knows it can pull 18 G's (human can only pull 8 (in a G-suit)
@@MichaelEdelman1954 The would be skin on skin hits, expanding rod (or coil) warhead and about a 10 meter kill radius .... still the world's most successful A-to-A missile..
@@fooman2108 Too bad nothing much was explained about how SW works... How does that coil expand: in one piece or is it supposed to fragment (like Flak, spewing metal)? What about ball-bearings, like a Claymore, tearing through a plane?
I've still got a scar from when I was struck by a Sidewinder, early 1970's! I was in the RAF servicing an English Electric Lightning when I ducked to cross under to the other side, but came up too soon and my head came into contact with one of the fins - blood everywhere! 😂
As a former pilot and amateur astronomer, the most fascinating story is how infrared astronomy started. The infrared tracking head from the AIM-9 Sidewinder ended up in the hands of the astronomer and of course he immediately attached it to the telescope. And so began IR astronomy with today's James Webb Space IR Telescope
@@michaelanderson3096 It actually started with the discovery of IR radiation in the 19th century, followed by attempts to detect an IR source in the 20s and 30s of the 20th century. Real progress was achieved only with the appearance of slide state cooled detectors in the early 1960s, i.e. the appearance of the AIM-9 IR cooled detector. It is interesting that the first people who started using an IR detector on a telescope were trained as physicists and not astronomers, who were not even interested in that field at the time, since water vapor in the atmosphere greatly limits the clear IR window for useful detection. If I remember correctly, the first IR orbiting telescope/detector was launched only in the 1980s (I think it was 1983 or 84).
I started my career touching a 9X eng development asset in 1998 in Texas. Multiple decades of production later, I suspect the 9X will outlast my days until I retire. Great weapon!!
What kind of connector shell housing are used on the aim7/9 series? I have a Dale Vishay insert im trying to find a housing for. Dale Vishay - Shearoff Insert Assy PN:810AS1325-2 / PN:QX32P-SW325
Well done documentary. I was a mfg tech for the F-14 weapon control system. I recall a 50msec pulse to derich the engine when a Sidewinder missile was launched. The missile exhaust would stall the jet momentarily.
Very interesting. Dad worked on Sidewinder in the 50's - 60's (GE-LMED) along with Chaparral. I remember him traveling to China Lake. He and his colleagues were pretty excited when the Libyan jets were shot down.
Oh! I remember that! I worked at a place that made the amplifiers for the sensor systems. They were quite tight about who the customer was. That day, a bunch of the Engineer's were huddled around a radio and a huge cheer came up all over the fans and offices. That's what the were building. I mean, really, who used 60 Ghz amplifiers? That was, what 45-47 years ago!
I think they should have mentioned that Soviets got one that was dud imbedded to a Mig, end reverse-engineered it to their Atoll. Also the "Sidewinder growl" was not mentioned and explained, only heard in the Libyan incident.
I curious what your mindset was when writing this comment. THe documentary was very extensive but you wanted to nit pick what they didn't do. Did you write it to make yourself seem smart or were you concerned about missing information that was readily available everywhere. Also what age were you when writing that comment. Please reply.
The thing is there’s so many things that could’ve went wrong that it couldn’t just be a dud there is a contact fuze and a influence they are completely separate of each other
@@chaosinsurgency6636 if you mean the proximity fuze, it wasn't implemented on the AIM-9B that was shot in the taiwan incident. it only had a contact fuze. and the contact fuze doesn't detonate the warhead, it sends a signal to the S-A device which does the detonation. and they did report that the contact fuze failed.
Great documentary. My father, an old Navy Chief '44-'63, and Enterprise plankowner, always talked about the Sidewinders, even though he was running the nuclear engines. USN, tip of the spear (or trident)!
fine documentary. back in the day when nots china lake was more like a startup than a navy facility. days gone by, but nice to reminisce. also, shows some of the leading edge of media technology by the technical information department to produce these videos. remember the source materials is circa 1950. proud nots/nwc/nawcwd alumni 1974-2011.
As the Chief Pilot of my unit I was 'given to CLWS to test the Snake's Sidearm-II project. The Chinook was the airframe of choice simply because there was room in the radio/comms closet for the required gear. Ant any airspeed less than medium airspeed, the rotor down wash disrupted the missile after firing and was cancelled. I was secretly happy since the system would have removed my starboard gunner, and fighter and gunship cover was better than adding another weapons system would have impaired our ability to do what were supposed to. Ever heard of a Chinook being shot up by an enemy fighter or swing wing bird? Me either. :P Excellent video. Moreso since it was produced in 91-92 and the Snake is still under wings and in weapons bays.
Ironically sidearm wasn't meant to be an air to air weapon it was an anti radiation sidewinder to kill radar guided AAA like the shilka. Have you ever heard of short range AAA being effective against helicopters?
I just jumped when Wally Schirra just popped at 21:13 in this video as a Sidewinder test pilot. Google him If you never heard of him. Because you should. A little hint: do some research on how many guys flew all three, all important: Mercury, Gemini and Apollo.
Col. Robin Olds personally launched a dozen or so AIM-4 Falcons without so much as a kill, with the majority of them flying off into the sun, or not launching at all! He was so pissed, he ordered his entire squadron of F-4s rewired and re-plumbed for the AIM-9's without Washington's approval. Soon after, their kill ratio jumped up to a level that caused concern for the NVAF. The rest of the USAF soon followed suit with refitting the rest of their fighter inventory for the AIM-9, and the Falcon slipped into obscurity.
My father worked at NOTS China Lake 1958-61 and we lived on the base with him. Years later he gave me a copy of Westrum's book. I particularly like the early chapters which describe the scrounging for funds and early bureaucracy fights. He was on a first name basis with many of the people interviewed here and my brother and I went to school with their kids. Great memories.
@@bagoquarks Nice info 👍 I actually used their examples of giving users support in the field (actually at sea!) to start doing that in our company. We had issues with some products that were caused by lack of training or experience. We would, and still do, send field support guys to help, usually at no charge.
NOTS what is now our beloved NAVAIRSYSCOM NAWCWD (WEAPONS DIVISION) CHLK! REPRESENT!! The guy that narrates this vid. He’s so chill. The only guy I know that can show up in flip flops and cargo shorts and no one says a word.
Everybody, let’s put it into perspective. This missile was created in 1947 1950s so it’s been more than seventy years now imagine what they have now that will become the Declassified in 70 or 100 years from now makes you wonder.
I'm not so sure...I think that despite how much is spent today, the innovation output has declined compared to this golden period. Perhaps because the aerospace primes became fat and happy creaming off the profits from 30+ year product lifetimes. Eg the Navy's main anti ship missile Harpoon hasn't progressed anything like as much as Sidewinder did... the Amraam is now outclassed... both should have been replaced years ago. USA has lost its technological lead in many areas and is lagging China and even Iran.
Proud to watch my country's missile in this documentary. Unfortunately, due to many reasons and like many other technological programs, Piranha missile didn't go ahead. A salute from Brazil!
When I was getting out of the Navy, I had 120 days leave on the books, so I got a civilian job in (believe it or not, bleaker than Ridgecrest!) Trona. Lived in a trailer house outside of Ridgecrest. Maybe it was the tumble weeds that gives it's charm! Being around their, you did see and hear some stange things going on! China Lake is a huge desolate, barren base, with a bunch of crashed airplanes (& other "targets" rocket sleds).
Many of the people interviewed in that video are dead. Archival footage means that the video starts to feel like the era in which the interviews were granted.
At an Edward's Air Force Days visit in 1961 I walked by a display of a sidewinder missile. It's sensor followed me, as the canard wings steered toward me. 63 years ago, the public was shown.
I was straining my eyes to see if I would recognize any faces in this complex docu. I grew up at China lake and wherry housing. Went to Burroughs and joined the navy at 17. What a really crazy place to raise a family.
love loading them great missile to handle, and the its launcher LAU-7 fun to work on, not to fond of LAU-138. bit more of a pain in the but to work on than the 7. from an old navy AO
Oh look! We had a thrust vectoring, off bore, and even a helmet aiming system before the Soviets had one in the Mig 29?! But yet we were shocked how effective it was when the U.S Air Force evaluated it after the wall fell?! Hmmmmmmmm.
Bureaucracy, red tape, industry lobby... call what you want, these things always killed many great weapons programs for decades. I also was amazed to see they had the concept in the 50's and a proof of concept in the 70's. Amazing.
@@sloppydog4831 the reason it was passed over as we would see is because in a real life engagement the dogfight as you see it is simply not a thing that has ever existed 90% of the time the person you're attack is unaware which is why the usaf has spent it's weight in gold evening the odds in that eventuality
I wish i would live in the 60s. Seems like it was a much simpler time. Guess everyone secretly wants things they cant have. Lets make thr best with what we have :)
Going against the grain; this was disruption and innovation before the concept became buzzwords. I hope NOTS is still active as its own creature. The best missiles and smart weapons came from NOTS.
Robin Olds only wanted his F4s equipped with the sidewinders for strike escort. Once got in trouble because a superior seen no Sparrows equipped on a H model, he thought they were Ds. Whoops lol
"And the secretaries who actually ran the whole place...." 1:04:36 A nice remark for the secretaries who typically were doing all the heavy work as liaisons between everyone.
@@paristo There are two groups of people, you never ever want to anger. Secretaries and Janitors, for they can make your life truly miserable; or so much easier if you pay them some respect.
If it weren't for economic pressures that force aircraft manufacturers to improve upon existing designs instead use advancements to make a new one the 747 would be long gone The B52 just so happened to be good enough at expensively fighting low intensity conflicts that it was still viable
The culture of innovation is what comes through...empowerment, initiative, passion, team spirit, competition and rivalry in a self contained environment with all capabilities in-house. This was a taxpayer-funded government lab, yet it seemed to exhibit all the values promoted today as unique to private industry and seemed to run rings around the aerospace primes. This success story hasn't made it into the American innovation mythology...listen to politicians today and you'd think of all government employees as lazy drags on the economy. Today the aerospace primes are fat and happy but are starting to be embarrassed by the new entrants like Anduril. It will be interesting to see whether that aggressive VC culture can reach or even exceed the bar set by China Lake.
And after all this glad-handing and self-congratulations on what an amazing missile we've built... the thing still can't achieve better than 65% - 70% kill ratio. Why can't we do better? Is it something to do with A-A combat and less to do with the missiles themselves? Inquiring minds want to know!
That's a sticking plaster rush job to press a SAM into service as a AAM... because they got complacent with Amraam and let China and Russia pull ahead.
Yeah, the Falcon was more or less a joke. But the Sparrow had it's evolution, going on to become the Standard-ARM air to ground missile that goes after search and missile guidance radar sets. But the AIM-9, heh! You can see how far they went to market the little meanie, all the way to becoming an ASAT satellite killer.
@@Nighthawke70 & yet for years I thought Hughes' Falcon the best & even puzzled about the Navy not adopting it. In 1960 Hughes even boasted of the nuclear-tipped Falcon 9. Turned out to nutting. Hughes was a fraud through & through. About another AA missile, why the US abandoned the nuclear ''Genie'' ? Although unguided it could sink a much-vaunted Sverdlovsk dreddnut. & also the Davy Crockett nuclear mortar.
@@Charlesputnam-bn9zy The GENIE was specifically designed for the F-101, F-89, f-104/106 interceptors and those were being made obsolete by the rapid advance of technology and the rampant X-Plane programs underway. The F-106 was tried with a trapeze rig, but didn't get very far beyond the testing stage. Using one of those was akin to using a sledgehammer to swat a mosquito. Sure, it was VERY satisfying, but then you had to fix the holes it created. Plus the firing safeties were primitive. PAL was not yet perfected and the arming was set when it launched. Fuzing was time delay; Imagine if your rangefinder was out of whack and you set it to minimums and it lit off. No way to get away from it! Bottom line, it was overkill, and the treaties at the time was threatening to put it out of existence.
@@Nighthawke70 Thank you for all this information. I was astonished at seeing the AAM Sidewinder proteanly turning SAM Chapparal ! In my teen days, I viewed it as heresy !
Ridgecrest CA was described by it's most famous alumis, Mark Hoppus (Blink-182 guy), as "geniuses, scientists, physicists and then just complete strung-out meth-heads". What was it like to grow up there?
Its to bad that humanity glorifies weapons that destroy and kill. But being able to defend against those evil powers that would do us harm, justifies sharing the knowledge associated with these weapons.
An AIM 9B or D couldn’t hit ant aircraft unless it was in straight, level 1G flight. When first used on the F-4B in Vietnam, when the MiG (and the Phantom) were in a mild 2G turn, the missile would lose lock and fly off to nowhere, and then (perhaps) swing wildly back into view and towards the target. It was not good enough for dogfighting with MiGs.
That's not true. The AIM-9D was what scored the majority of USN/USMC air-to-air kills in the Vietnam War. For 1966, it was the best air-to-air missile anyone had. By 1972, it was superceded with the AIM-9G, followed by the AIM-9H a little while later.
@@Tigershark_3082 You might feel this way from an someone’s historical point of view, but In total 452 Sidewinders were fired during the Vietnam War, resulting in a kill probability of 0.18. So 92% of the time when a pilot in SE Asia fired a sidewinder it missed the target. This is evidenced by the personal histories of pilots who flew in the war during 64-66. Source: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIM-9_Sidewinder
@@restaurantattheendofthegalaxy A .18 kill probability, if you do the math, indicates a 82 percent non kill rate, not 92 percent. Hyperbole or bad at maths? The world may never know
I'm surprised we gave our state of the art guided missile to Taiwan, and I'm amazed one got stuck in a Chicom MiGs tail pipe. That's why you don't give your best stuff out.
I think the blame there went to the old surplus Navy VT fuses they employed on the early Sidewinders. Some were faulty to the point of premature detonation upon firing. One 5 inch shell went off not 15 feet out of the muzzle of the gun, startling the lot on the bridge. This one apparently didn't arm or activate at all!
Uhh, reminder: China had The Bomb. If an American fighter had fired on the CHICOMs, regardless of the fact that they were defending against an aerial attack on Taiwan, the fecal matter could have fissioned globally upon contact with that Chinese fan.
I can't watch this video where BuOrd is bragging about how well they ran the Sidewinder program while BuAir was flailing trying to make Sparrow (and the entire US defense establishment was making an abominable mess of the Falcon); and not constantly dwell on how many sailors died because BuOrd made bad, just tremendously bad and faulty, Mk 14 torpedoes, stubbornly insisting they weren't bad and refusing to fix them for years while everyone kept painstakingly showing them how bad they were. It really seems like glass houses all around doesn't it?
You know it is possible to learn from mistakes and become better. It's clear that the lack of testing which resulted in such terrible weapons like the Mk 14, was not an issue come the 50s and 60s. China lake and other sites were in many ways a response to the old BuOrd's failings. If the guys at China lake had been around for pre-war torpedo development I'm sure we would have had the best torpedo in the world.
The torpedo problem was not confinded to US, Brits and Germans had problems with magnetic fused torpedoes at start of ww2 IT WAS more complex than initially thought.
49:40 James H. Irvine; HAP Project Engineer.... you're full of shit lol. The Egyptians *WERE NOT* flying over the Sinai at "Mach 3, or Mach 4 *something* " sir, c'mon.
Still early generation. Takes time to work the problems out. All military tech goes through this process. Design, test, deploy, evaluation, redesign, deploy, evaluate......
'Worlds most successful air to air missile' the hit ratio (according to the maker is .79 per missile fired!) since the original doctrine was to fire TWO per engagement, you fire two you are just about GUARANTEED a kill! I tried the simulator that Raytheon made which has a battery powered cart with a missile dummy on it (with guidance steering it), they would hand you a lit cigarette, all you had to do was stay away from it for 30 seconds in an aircraft hangar (and you would win a nice $50) last I heard with the aim-9L they had given away less than $500 in 25 years!
It must have been a lot of fun
@@BalticaBeer by the time they got to the 9mike they had basically given it the brain of a cutting horse, it would cut corners and the cpu knows it can pull 18 G's (human can only pull 8 (in a G-suit)
Almost guarenteed. A hit probability of 0.79 means that the probability of at least one of two hitting is 95.6%. For three missiles fired, it’s 99.07%
@@MichaelEdelman1954 The would be skin on skin hits, expanding rod (or coil) warhead and about a 10 meter kill radius .... still the world's most successful A-to-A missile..
@@fooman2108 Too bad nothing much was explained about how SW works... How does that coil expand: in one piece or is it supposed to fragment (like Flak, spewing metal)? What about ball-bearings, like a Claymore, tearing through a plane?
I've still got a scar from when I was struck by a Sidewinder, early 1970's! I was in the RAF servicing an English Electric Lightning when I ducked to cross under to the other side, but came up too soon and my head came into contact with one of the fins - blood everywhere! 😂
Bloody Hell Mate!
As a former pilot and amateur astronomer, the most fascinating story is how infrared astronomy started. The infrared tracking head from the AIM-9 Sidewinder ended up in the hands of the astronomer and of course he immediately attached it to the telescope. And so began IR astronomy with today's James Webb Space IR Telescope
Lie ?
@@michaelanderson3096 It actually started with the discovery of IR radiation in the 19th century, followed by attempts to detect an IR source in the 20s and 30s of the 20th century. Real progress was achieved only with the appearance of slide state cooled detectors in the early 1960s, i.e. the appearance of the AIM-9 IR cooled detector. It is interesting that the first people who started using an IR detector on a telescope were trained as physicists and not astronomers, who were not even interested in that field at the time, since water vapor in the atmosphere greatly limits the clear IR window for useful detection. If I remember correctly, the first IR orbiting telescope/detector was launched only in the 1980s (I think it was 1983 or 84).
HOGWASH. That's your made-up fantasy.
I started my career touching a 9X eng development asset in 1998 in Texas. Multiple decades of production later, I suspect the 9X will outlast my days until I retire. Great weapon!!
What kind of connector shell housing are used on the aim7/9 series? I have a Dale Vishay insert im trying to find a housing for. Dale Vishay -
Shearoff Insert Assy PN:810AS1325-2 / PN:QX32P-SW325
This was the best weapons documentary I have ever seen
He has one on the Walleye that is pretty good too.
Well done documentary. I was a mfg tech for the F-14 weapon control system. I recall a 50msec pulse to derich the engine when a Sidewinder missile was launched. The missile exhaust would stall the jet momentarily.
Good ol' Pratt & Whitney TF-30 :)
I like the ending where everyone involved is credited! Not just the big names in the project. Great documentary.
My dad work at Raytheon on Sidewinder and Sparrow in the late 60s and 70s. It is great to see the full story. Thanks
Very interesting. Dad worked on Sidewinder in the 50's - 60's (GE-LMED) along with Chaparral. I remember him traveling to China Lake. He and his colleagues were pretty excited when the Libyan jets were shot down.
Oh! I remember that! I worked at a place that made the amplifiers for the sensor systems. They were quite tight about who the customer was. That day, a bunch of the Engineer's were huddled around a radio and a huge cheer came up all over the fans and offices. That's what the were building. I mean, really, who used 60 Ghz amplifiers? That was, what 45-47 years ago!
I think they should have mentioned that Soviets got one that was dud imbedded to a Mig, end reverse-engineered it to their Atoll. Also the "Sidewinder growl" was not mentioned and explained, only heard in the Libyan incident.
I curious what your mindset was when writing this comment. THe documentary was very extensive but you wanted to nit pick what they didn't do. Did you write it to make yourself seem smart or were you concerned about missing information that was readily available everywhere. Also what age were you when writing that comment. Please reply.
They literally said "and the Soviet copy"
I don't think you actually paid attention to the entire video.
@@thecacklemanlol to “what age were you”
The thing is there’s so many things that could’ve went wrong that it couldn’t just be a dud there is a contact fuze and a influence they are completely separate of each other
@@chaosinsurgency6636 if you mean the proximity fuze, it wasn't implemented on the AIM-9B that was shot in the taiwan incident. it only had a contact fuze. and the contact fuze doesn't detonate the warhead, it sends a signal to the S-A device which does the detonation. and they did report that the contact fuze failed.
Duuuude YOUR CHANNEL IS AWESOME. I've been looking for documentaries that focus entirely on such weapons systems programs and their development.
The original "snakes on a plane" :D
Fantastic documentary, thanks for uploading!
This film is a reminder that those of us standing today, do so on the shoulders of giants. God bless America!
Something not mentioned in the documentary. The Lima variant was the decisive factor in the air during the Falklands Conflict.
My grandfather worked on the sidewinder, may he Rest In Peace
Great documentary. My father, an old Navy Chief '44-'63, and Enterprise plankowner, always talked about the Sidewinders, even though he was running the nuclear engines. USN, tip of the spear (or trident)!
For a old AO This was a killer video!👍
fine documentary. back in the day when nots china lake was more like a startup than a navy facility. days gone by, but nice to reminisce. also, shows some of the leading edge of media technology by the technical information department to produce these videos. remember the source materials is circa 1950. proud nots/nwc/nawcwd alumni 1974-2011.
Never heard of the folding fin Sidewinder before! Great stuff!
a very good documentary of sidewinder history!
As the Chief Pilot of my unit I was 'given to CLWS to test the Snake's Sidearm-II project. The Chinook was the airframe of choice simply because there was room in the radio/comms closet for the required gear. Ant any airspeed less than medium airspeed, the rotor down wash disrupted the missile after firing and was cancelled. I was secretly happy since the system would have removed my starboard gunner, and fighter and gunship cover was better than adding another weapons system would have impaired our ability to do what were supposed to. Ever heard of a Chinook being shot up by an enemy fighter or swing wing bird? Me either. :P
Excellent video. Moreso since it was produced in 91-92 and the Snake is still under wings and in weapons bays.
Ironically sidearm wasn't meant to be an air to air weapon it was an anti radiation sidewinder to kill radar guided AAA like the shilka. Have you ever heard of short range AAA being effective against helicopters?
Second documentary I've watched on this channel, SO GOOD!
Excellent video. I loved the little cartoons that were drawn by the people on the team. I would love to see all of them.
thank you mr pahuta for one hell of a great story.
I recommend reading Ron Westrum's excellent book - Sidewinder: Creative Development at China Lake.
I just jumped when Wally Schirra just popped at 21:13 in this video as a Sidewinder test pilot. Google him If you never heard of him. Because you should. A little hint: do some research on how many guys flew all three, all important: Mercury, Gemini and Apollo.
Wally was great. i liked it when he said that tandem seat jet had a cigarette lighter.
Col. Robin Olds personally launched a dozen or so AIM-4 Falcons without so much as a kill, with the majority of them flying off into the sun, or not launching at all! He was so pissed, he ordered his entire squadron of F-4s rewired and re-plumbed for the AIM-9's without Washington's approval. Soon after, their kill ratio jumped up to a level that caused concern for the NVAF. The rest of the USAF soon followed suit with refitting the rest of their fighter inventory for the AIM-9, and the Falcon slipped into obscurity.
Another thing that never happened 😋 🥪
Reminds me of the US torpedo problems in WW2
@@Mungobohne1 well... according to “Wikipedia” it did..
ADRM. Paul had a lot to do w/ that.
Been looking for this - thanks!
Super Vid 👍👍!
Ran it through twice.
Many thanx, be safe 🦊
"Fox 2"
Excellent, excellent show. "... and to the Secretaries..."
and here is to all of the great women who either have the answer or can get it for you. salute.
What a fascinating documentary!
Wonderful documentary with a lot of info that i had never heard of (subwinder??) Thanks for making / uploading this.
A marvelous documentary, a real pleasure to watch. Thanks to everyone for this.
Excellent film, thanks for uploading! The book "Sidewinder" by Ron Westrum is a good read.
My father worked at NOTS China Lake 1958-61 and we lived on the base with him. Years later he gave me a copy of Westrum's book. I particularly like the early chapters which describe the scrounging for funds and early bureaucracy fights. He was on a first name basis with many of the people interviewed here and my brother and I went to school with their kids. Great memories.
@@bagoquarks Nice info 👍 I actually used their examples of giving users support in the field (actually at sea!) to start doing that in our company. We had issues with some products that were caused by lack of training or experience. We would, and still do, send field support guys to help, usually at no charge.
AIM9H first solid state LM709 OpAmps 1974
NOTS what is now our beloved NAVAIRSYSCOM NAWCWD (WEAPONS DIVISION) CHLK! REPRESENT!!
The guy that narrates this vid. He’s so chill. The only guy I know that can show up in flip flops and cargo shorts and no one says a word.
Everybody, let’s put it into perspective. This missile was created in 1947 1950s so it’s been more than seventy years now imagine what they have now that will become the Declassified in 70 or 100 years from now makes you wonder.
I'm not so sure...I think that despite how much is spent today, the innovation output has declined compared to this golden period. Perhaps because the aerospace primes became fat and happy creaming off the profits from 30+ year product lifetimes. Eg the Navy's main anti ship missile Harpoon hasn't progressed anything like as much as Sidewinder did... the Amraam is now outclassed... both should have been replaced years ago. USA has lost its technological lead in many areas and is lagging China and even Iran.
First thing I hear is the audio from the Gulf of Sidra incident: this is going to be a great video!!!
Proud to watch my country's missile in this documentary.
Unfortunately, due to many reasons and like many other technological programs, Piranha missile didn't go ahead.
A salute from Brazil!
When I was getting out of the Navy, I had 120 days leave on the books, so I got a civilian job in (believe it or not, bleaker than Ridgecrest!) Trona. Lived in a trailer house outside of Ridgecrest. Maybe it was the tumble weeds that gives it's charm!
Being around their, you did see and hear some stange things going on!
China Lake is a huge desolate, barren base, with a bunch of crashed airplanes (& other "targets" rocket sleds).
Great film, but interesting that for 2002 it feels like it's from the 70s.
Many of the people interviewed in that video are dead. Archival footage means that the video starts to feel like the era in which the interviews were granted.
Excelent documentary!
At an Edward's Air Force Days visit in 1961 I walked by a display of a sidewinder missile.
It's sensor followed me, as the canard wings steered toward me.
63 years ago, the public was shown.
This is what Smarter Every Day was Trying to do. Cheers from curious droid and spicy110
Excellent video 👍
I haven't seen this before. Good to see many faces of the "Dads" (my neighbors) that I recognize
I was straining my eyes to see if I would recognize any faces in this complex docu. I grew up at China lake and wherry housing. Went to Burroughs and joined the navy at 17. What a really crazy place to raise a family.
Very good documentary thanks for sharing
love loading them great missile to handle, and the its launcher LAU-7 fun to work on, not to fond of LAU-138. bit more of a pain in the but to work on than the 7. from an old navy AO
sea power for security
Great documentary! Public works are ALWAYS better than private endeavors.
Yes like the US Navy Mk 14 WWII
Torpedo !
I'd like to know, BalticBeer, is if you have on hand a documentary film about the development and history of the AIM-7 Sparrow AAM?
Nope
Awesome documentary!
Amazing weapon, amazing story !
Oh look! We had a thrust vectoring, off bore, and even a helmet aiming system before the Soviets had one in the Mig 29?! But yet we were shocked how effective it was when the U.S Air Force evaluated it after the wall fell?! Hmmmmmmmm.
Bureaucracy, red tape, industry lobby... call what you want, these things always killed many great weapons programs for decades. I also was amazed to see they had the concept in the 50's and a proof of concept in the 70's. Amazing.
VTAS?
@@sloppydog4831 the reason it was passed over as we would see is because in a real life engagement the dogfight as you see it is simply not a thing that has ever existed 90% of the time the person you're attack is unaware which is why the usaf has spent it's weight in gold evening the odds in that eventuality
I wish i would live in the 60s. Seems like it was a much simpler time. Guess everyone secretly wants things they cant have.
Lets make thr best with what we have :)
I can assure you that it was better time. We used to call TVs boob tubes. We weren't wrong.
Excellent thanks
Going against the grain; this was disruption and innovation before the concept became buzzwords. I hope NOTS is still active as its own creature. The best missiles and smart weapons came from NOTS.
Robin Olds only wanted his F4s equipped with the sidewinders for strike escort. Once got in trouble because a superior seen no Sparrows equipped on a H model, he thought they were Ds. Whoops lol
Walt LaBerge reminds me of R. Lee Ermey (the gunnery sergeant) from Full Metal jacket!
"And the secretaries that ran the place..."
"And the secretaries who actually ran the whole place...." 1:04:36
A nice remark for the secretaries who typically were doing all the heavy work as liaisons between everyone.
@@paristo There are two groups of people, you never ever want to anger.
Secretaries and Janitors, for they can make your life truly miserable; or so much easier if you pay them some respect.
@@kilianortmann9979AS long as secretaries remember that they are not in the chain of command
who is here because of smarter every days video on the aim9-m
55:56 that might be the only footage of an A-7 Corsair II firing an AIM-9 variant. I’ve never seen a Sidewinder being fired off an A-7 before.
Whats next after flare resistant off bore winder? Leaving the competition in the dust
One change to the design of the Sidewinder would be liquid nitrogen for greater heat sensitivity.
Also argon and stirling cryo-pumps
Hurt to see the F6Fs and B17s shot down. Remarkable that the Sidewinder, B52, and 747...designed principally by slide rule....still in service.
If it weren't for economic pressures that force aircraft manufacturers to improve upon existing designs instead use advancements to make a new one the 747 would be long gone
The B52 just so happened to be good enough at expensively fighting low intensity conflicts that it was still viable
The culture of innovation is what comes through...empowerment, initiative, passion, team spirit, competition and rivalry in a self contained environment with all capabilities in-house. This was a taxpayer-funded government lab, yet it seemed to exhibit all the values promoted today as unique to private industry and seemed to run rings around the aerospace primes. This success story hasn't made it into the American innovation mythology...listen to politicians today and you'd think of all government employees as lazy drags on the economy. Today the aerospace primes are fat and happy but are starting to be embarrassed by the new entrants like Anduril. It will be interesting to see whether that aggressive VC culture can reach or even exceed the bar set by China Lake.
having seen this and the agm62 one. i wonder. is there any other development place that has had such "simple" yet long lasting systems?
Prob saab if I were to look
Gems of UA-cam
where can i find more/other ordnance & munition documentaries
Search the net for China Lake Museum Foundation gift shop. They have this and several other great documentaries on DVD.
@@scottmillett9862Great!! I'll check it out. Thanks!
@@scottmillett9862 I'd like to visit the NOTS museum ....wish I could find a year book to look up past employees and family members....
Best missile ever
"shoot him!!" - "I haven't got tone..." we have all been there.
alot of "fun kind of socializing it was". I know what he means.
And after all this glad-handing and self-congratulations on what an amazing missile we've built... the thing still can't achieve better than 65% - 70% kill ratio.
Why can't we do better? Is it something to do with A-A combat and less to do with the missiles themselves? Inquiring minds want to know!
Isn't the opening audio from the gulf of sidra using the sparrow ("fox1 fox1!")
Nm , 1 sparrow 1 sidewinder kill there
Shout out China Lake.
Frank Cartwright looks like the professor from Gilligan's Island!
Most of the music was awesome bot it got really disco near the end. How come?? And don't say it's period-correct........
How were the target planes flown???? Remote???
Yeah
Now there's AIM-174, an air-launched SM-6. A Navy missile, that the Air Force is going to get given whether they're happy about it or not. Heh.
That's a sticking plaster rush job to press a SAM into service as a AAM... because they got complacent with Amraam and let China and Russia pull ahead.
It just fell off the pylon!
This extraordinary product by Philco beats Raytheon's Sparrows & Hughes' Falcon.
Yeah, the Falcon was more or less a joke. But the Sparrow had it's evolution, going on to become the Standard-ARM air to ground missile that goes after search and missile guidance radar sets. But the AIM-9, heh! You can see how far they went to market the little meanie, all the way to becoming an ASAT satellite killer.
@@Nighthawke70 & yet for years I thought Hughes' Falcon the best & even puzzled about the Navy not adopting it. In 1960 Hughes even boasted of the nuclear-tipped Falcon 9.
Turned out to nutting.
Hughes was a fraud through & through.
About another AA missile, why the US abandoned the nuclear ''Genie'' ?
Although unguided it could sink a much-vaunted Sverdlovsk dreddnut.
& also the Davy Crockett nuclear mortar.
@@Charlesputnam-bn9zy The GENIE was specifically designed for the F-101, F-89, f-104/106 interceptors and those were being made obsolete by the rapid advance of technology and the rampant X-Plane programs underway. The F-106 was tried with a trapeze rig, but didn't get very far beyond the testing stage.
Using one of those was akin to using a sledgehammer to swat a mosquito. Sure, it was VERY satisfying, but then you had to fix the holes it created. Plus the firing safeties were primitive. PAL was not yet perfected and the arming was set when it launched. Fuzing was time delay; Imagine if your rangefinder was out of whack and you set it to minimums and it lit off. No way to get away from it!
Bottom line, it was overkill, and the treaties at the time was threatening to put it out of existence.
@@Nighthawke70 Thank you for all this information.
I was astonished at seeing the AAM Sidewinder proteanly turning SAM Chapparal ! In my teen days, I viewed it as heresy !
To clarify: The product manufactured by Philco, in compliance with the design drawing package created by the civil service/military team at the Lake.
Reminds me of my mothers bush. Thanks!
This is a pretty cool documentary
The US government destroyed A4 skyhawks testing the Sidewinder....46:40 I died a little inside.
Same
That was a QF-86 Sabre, just as heart breaking to view
Amazing what happens when you let smart motivated people loose on a project and leave them alone
Ridgecrest CA was described by it's most famous alumis, Mark Hoppus (Blink-182 guy), as "geniuses, scientists, physicists and then just complete strung-out meth-heads". What was it like to grow up there?
17:49 Looks like M. Emmet Walsh
53:43 growling sidewinder moment
🤒🤒🤒
Great. Humans are ALWAYS more interesting than technology
that depends upon what your focus is.
raytheon can do off shelf
Here before war thunder
Please do a p-47 documentary
These people’s progeny have the old money now. Old-tech fortune
Its to bad that humanity glorifies weapons that destroy and kill. But being able to defend against those evil powers that would do us harm, justifies sharing the knowledge associated with these weapons.
You get them in Walmart, next to the milk
They don’t even mention that the Soviets reverse engineered the missile
Yes they do.
They did
16:45 - wife was in labor. went on into work... doesnt skip a beat. The sacrafice of this generation.
Merchants of DEATH. Great people
An AIM 9B or D couldn’t hit ant aircraft unless it was in straight, level 1G flight. When first used on the F-4B in Vietnam, when the MiG (and the Phantom) were in a mild 2G turn, the missile would lose lock and fly off to nowhere, and then (perhaps) swing wildly back into view and towards the target. It was not good enough for dogfighting with MiGs.
That's not true.
The AIM-9D was what scored the majority of USN/USMC air-to-air kills in the Vietnam War.
For 1966, it was the best air-to-air missile anyone had.
By 1972, it was superceded with the AIM-9G, followed by the AIM-9H a little while later.
@@Tigershark_3082 You might feel this way from an someone’s historical point of view, but In total 452 Sidewinders were fired during the Vietnam War, resulting in a kill probability of 0.18. So 92% of the time when a pilot in SE Asia fired a sidewinder it missed the target. This is evidenced by the personal histories of pilots who flew in the war during 64-66.
Source: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIM-9_Sidewinder
@@restaurantattheendofthegalaxy A .18 kill probability, if you do the math, indicates a 82 percent non kill rate, not 92 percent. Hyperbole or bad at maths? The world may never know
@@jazzmusiccontinues1134 oh just bad at math, thanks for straightening me out.
I'm surprised we gave our state of the art guided missile to Taiwan, and I'm amazed one got stuck in a Chicom MiGs tail pipe. That's why you don't give your best stuff out.
I think the blame there went to the old surplus Navy VT fuses they employed on the early Sidewinders. Some were faulty to the point of premature detonation upon firing. One 5 inch shell went off not 15 feet out of the muzzle of the gun, startling the lot on the bridge.
This one apparently didn't arm or activate at all!
Uhh, reminder: China had The Bomb. If an American fighter had fired on the CHICOMs, regardless of the fact that they were defending against an aerial attack on Taiwan, the fecal matter could have fissioned globally upon contact with that Chinese fan.
Nah, a friend in need is a friend indeed. Taiwan has been a staunch ally, our Asian Israel.
@@alswann2702 Taiwan has been vastly better than israel, who steals our stuff and sells it to adversaries.
I can't watch this video where BuOrd is bragging about how well they ran the Sidewinder program while BuAir was flailing trying to make Sparrow (and the entire US defense establishment was making an abominable mess of the Falcon); and not constantly dwell on how many sailors died because BuOrd made bad, just tremendously bad and faulty, Mk 14 torpedoes, stubbornly insisting they weren't bad and refusing to fix them for years while everyone kept painstakingly showing them how bad they were. It really seems like glass houses all around doesn't it?
You know it is possible to learn from mistakes and become better. It's clear that the lack of testing which resulted in such terrible weapons like the Mk 14, was not an issue come the 50s and 60s. China lake and other sites were in many ways a response to the old BuOrd's failings. If the guys at China lake had been around for pre-war torpedo development I'm sure we would have had the best torpedo in the world.
The torpedo problem was not confinded to US, Brits and Germans had problems with magnetic fused torpedoes at start of ww2 IT WAS more complex than initially thought.
49:40 James H. Irvine; HAP Project Engineer.... you're full of shit lol. The Egyptians *WERE NOT* flying over the Sinai at "Mach 3, or Mach 4 *something* " sir, c'mon.
Anyway, it seems that air air missiles had no much success and were no much used in Korea, etc. low success rate.
Still early generation. Takes time to work the problems out. All military tech goes through this process. Design, test, deploy, evaluation, redesign, deploy, evaluate......