This debate must be taken to every nook and corner of India. Across all of the spectrum. Students, professionals , academics, retirees, and women's groups. Media coverage should be pushed.
Yes, on that group of "Hindu" society who followed the Buddhist sect. This narrative that sects before the Buddhist one were preaching caste discrimination and Buddhist theology was the liberator has been completely demolished.
Hinduism (rather Sanātana) has two dharshanas (schools of philosophies) - Āstika and Nāstika. Āstika dharshans believe in the authority of the Vedas, while Nāstika darshans don't. Both Buddhism and Jainism are a part of Nāstika dharshana. They are not separate from Sanātana.
This debate must be taken to every nook and corner of India. Across all of the spectrum. Students, professionals , academics, retirees, and women's groups. Media coverage should be pushed.
Thank you for these findings
Amazing insights
Unless, Govt takes up this as part of education, wrong narratives will continue to reign supreme
Share this max guys
Visuddh manusmriti aur satyarth prakash sabhi padhe
In dharmapada bhudha defined the nature of a brahmin and the quality of brahmin he was not anti brahmanical
Bhudhism is very much part of Hinduism so the blame is against hindu society there was no separate bhudhist society
Yes, on that group of "Hindu" society who followed the Buddhist sect. This narrative that sects before the Buddhist one were preaching caste discrimination and Buddhist theology was the liberator has been completely demolished.
Hinduism (rather Sanātana) has two dharshanas (schools of philosophies) - Āstika and Nāstika. Āstika dharshans believe in the authority of the Vedas, while Nāstika darshans don't.
Both Buddhism and Jainism are a part of Nāstika dharshana. They are not separate from Sanātana.