I did somthing similar when i put the car in second in 160kmh with my S40.. Just passed a car had topped out the 3rd gear and was gonna do a smooth shift to 4th gear just when i passed the car... The look on their face as i came down to about 100kmh with screetching tires and a wildly revving enginge was priceless. at that moment my volvo turned into a honda..
Lol happened to me bfore on my e30 was trying to change to 4th but i hitted 2nd gear and thank god i was around 3k rpm at that time, then it jumped to 5k almost reach to the rev limiter which is 7k weeewww!!
@@phil955i nearly none is wasted, it gets sucked in by the vacuum of the engine. you do see air and fuel coming back out, by bouncing of the valve, but it's not gonna fly off anywhere, it gets sucked back in
@@phil955i Overhead shower injection and downdraft heads/ports are quit common in hi-power N/A engines. Nothing is wastet there, it´s just simple physics. vacuum from the engine + gravity = max cylinder filling possible
@@mathi6832 they run about 10k revs i think, their engines are to big (to long stroke in particular) and with a ohv valvetrain you won't be doing 20k with an engine that big
There was no engine rpm regulation in F1 before 2007 which limit it to 18,000 rpm. BMW V10 engine was able to reach around 19,200 rpm on qualifying trim
Many years ago, I read a technical paper by Honda's chief engineer called something like "Design considerations for high-revving four-stroke engines (above 22,000 rpm)". Or four-cycle, depending which side of the Atlantic you live.
Very much enjoyed the Honda v-10 segment. Filming gave the impression of the old 50's military aeronautic testing. Because that's what this cutting edge stuff is. It's paramount to aerospace on the ground. Beautiful demonstration of engineering.
@@The-fs5wn yes of course I would imagine if it's fair to say, that I acknowledge the major difference involved by what is a reciprocating event of revolutions that quantify a end result of time equal to a minute, regardless of point of inflection for the sake of duration being perhaps just the same in the case of a more simple turning rate, where in your aeronautic example, 50,000 RPM may also be the same inflection case of the turbine blades and associated vane cause/response... also allowing a brief peak touch at the 50k height no different than the brief touch of said reciprocating mass assembly turning the output end 20k RPM. THE fact that I consider a aerospace delineage, is the fact that the extremes of any mechanical event regardless of mode of assembly, doesn't change the fact that aerospace tolerances and material adherence are just about always a inescapable consideration when the extremes also account for what is difficult or too many variables that cannot be reasonably seen and/or historically recorded. Therefore in the case of building a long staircase, outside of a building in which it's design from the first floor to the second floor is just one continuous step and landing. The importance of the stringer being the first cut of a 90° fact, in which how accurate that is in relation to the overall span and therefore the second cut can never be delineated out in space we therefore reference or trust the fact that our first 90 degree cut is dead on balls accurate in relation to the span or length of the entire series of step landings from the very first to the very last step. Not so much because if we are off even a quarter degree of angle in relation to 90° and therefore the resulting step itself, one can certainly feel by primordial instinct in which even our eyes when dealing with a straight line that now takes another break in path but still in accordance to what is a 90° line in continuance moving forward despite the breaks in its given scenario such as starting from your ceiling and now down your bedroom wall in which the headboard of your bed runs parallel to that wall and now that line all the way down to the floor must now travel forward 90° square to its original line across your bedroom floor and back up the adjacent wall as if someone were cutting a section of your bedroom away but also perfectly 90° square in relation to your bedroom being let's say in this case a square three-dimensional box. My point is even your eye in judgment where somewhere along that line when going down to the floor and now even off a very small degree in which it continues it's line across your floor but not square any longer, your eye in perception being the camera to your brain the processor doesn't need that line to go all the way across the room to be now obviously not square, and therefore no different than your foot when stepping up to a landing of a individual stair step, if the landing is even slightly tipping forward or back or to the side one way or the other from square, your foot being the probe or measure device will denote something is off and if it feels like it's tipping a hair forward your direction even slightly, it's because it is and generally never your imagination one way or the other just like it's off but you don't notice it, in just about all cases one will notice it whether it's by field or visually and more times than not immediately just like that line now ending at the bottom of your wall and beginning to make its way across your room it's not your imagination that within 12 in you will start to note more times than not there is an ever-increasing trajectory away from what should be square. I am making what is a rather long point in order to establish what is fact for the record but not the ultimate important fact because if a 90° cut out is off in relation to what is 90° square of the entire length, we do not have to succumb that a little bit off in the beginning will inescapably lead to being completely way off at the top as a result and therefore we can try to correct and recapture back to square by at least counterbalancing what is a line vertically or descending away from what is logically square and or dead flat as in plane or horizon. Maybe it wasn't our fault in the sense of diligence of the first cut and perhaps maybe our lack of procedure or experience knowing or theorizing the board length for the stringer itself is not exactly straight but slightly hued. Maybe it is in fact straight because we are experienced enough to check it no matter what but not experienced enough until now to realize as the day got warmer so did the board and now because of a inherent warp within its grain structure now halfway up the entire length and all the cuts we made we now notice something is veering from its square trajectory and sure enough the board has begun to hue... Here's my point, regardless of a reciprocating combustion style engine and or stringerboard for a continuous step landing outside our building from the first floor to the second floor, is not anything that resembles something that is going to orbit or fly around in outer space, it doesn't change the fact that most aerospace applications simply mean our adherence to what is close tolerance no different than the importance of square because no matter how those step landings resulting in a overall structure is now attached to the house even to the point of aerospace adherence in attachment and accounting for expansion and contraction and every possible known and unknown variable which is basically aerospace and or simply overkill to ensure what cannot be seen still gives us a chance of suitability and/or sustainability and/or survivability and all those positive things needed in order to ensure we are not shooting ourselves in the foot and we are not dooming ourselves before we even get started and so on and therefore all the aerospace intention in the world can never replace the fact that in the case of that step landing structure, the ever most important first cut and resulting 90° dead on balls next cut and the next one all the way to the top is a inescapable assurance that no matter what procedure or program in order of attachment to the building structure, The fact that those steps are all 90° square is an assurance of strength that nothing else can supersede or replace and therefore aerospace as an application is merely the implementation of every known engineering and physics fact advantage and therefore it all starts in inception where I'm sure in order for that piston engine to spin 20,000 RPM even just for a brief 10th of a second, I'm sure that cylinder block just in its own alloy composition was more than likely far more exceeding in integrity than perhaps it needed to be. And for the record I would be damn surprised that 50,000 RPM for a turbine engine was hardly anything exceeding what I imagine may have been 100,000 RPM in reality
In Australia that breed of bike was very popular. The Honda, Yamaha and Kawasaki 4 cylinder 250cc were everywhere. But a 20+year old 250cc with 100k on the odometer is pretty long in the tooth. Now the 2 cylinder 250 and 300cc bikes are so cheap and everyone is opting for them. Frankly the old breed is a much better, and now can be bought for about 1-2 grand. Maybe even less
@@baecchi4153 Check out these bikes. www.bikesales.com.au/bikes/?q=%28Service%3D%5BBikesales%5D%26%28Make%3D%5BYamaha%5D%26Model%3D%5BFZR400%5D%29%29&sortby=Price
I own an MC22 and I've ridden with the new Honda 250r's, R3's and ninja 400's and frankly the almost 30 year old 250 was faster than all of them. If you have the choice and the money get the RR or the old 250 ninja, they're the most fun you can have for under 5k
Enough torque to yank the skin off rice soup. Gotta be screaming to make some real motivation. That's the downside of very high rpm engines, they are not efficient at all until that small displacement is actually digesting a decent volume of air/fuel.
VisioRacer: Suggestions for future videos: smallest trucks (probably japanese), largest trucks (Cat 797, Belaz 75601 & the likes), weirdest trucks, weird/large pick-up trucks (including International CXT), weird engine or drivetrain configurations (like Tatra's drive tube), etc. Keep up the good work, you've got a talent for fetching interesting stuff.
Seeing that Honda F1 engine up close was the coolest most exciting thing i have ever seen. Seeing the fuel just SHOOTING into the cylinders and the motor just screaming out the exhaust Engines are fucking awesome man
V10 era f1 was allowed unlimited revs, 2006 allowed unlimited v8s. My favourite was the Ilmor Mercedes v10 of years 2000/2001. The best v10 sound evvveeererer!!!
2000 model Triumph TT600, 14,500 redline, & with tune guys were running 17,500, but blowing engines in the 18k+ range, the 2001 & newer had milder cams, so need to find a 2000 cam, if get a 2001-2004 bike, they FUN! I regret selling, but I was playing hard on streets, sold before I got killed
Four strokes sound sooo much better than two strokes.. I know this is somehow subjective . But i will never understand how anyone will prefer that two stroke sound over any of the four strokes in this video
Interesting the 20k barrier in F1 was first reached by a V8 from Cosworth, I always thought BMW cracked that with the 2005 engine. V10, 1000hp, 20k rpm.
And I saw it race for the first time, and Mick Grant crashed it in front of me. The Japanese engineers ran across the track while the GP was still in progress.
Honda is the most genius company in history. The genius of Soichira Honda and his racing spirit are unparalleled and it reflects in everything they ever made. They made the most advanced motorcycles of all time, dominate MotoGP with the record number of titles, Isle of Man TT, first car they ever made revved to 9500 rpm and beat cars with twice the amount of power. They went on dominating every single motorsports to dominating Ferrari in Formula 1 as well as at their own supercar game with the NSX. I don't care what gtr fanboys and Ferrari fanboys say. They always got owned by Honda anyway. Lol. SMART people know that Honda is the most legendary name in history of automobile and motorsports. No other brand even comes close to their genius and the art they create. (Maybe alfa romeo and ferrari had the passion but they never had the engineering genius and technical knowledge of Honda)
My 2010 250r only went to 14,500rpm before the limiter. But it was the fastest 250cc ninja in South Carolina at the time. Imagine going 150mph on a 250ninja lol. And that was slightly within a half mile. Took me $4,500 on a brand new bike and another $4,000 in upgrades to do it but it went from 29hp stock to 89hp and some gear change did it.
Oh those F1 V10's! Scariest sounding engines of all time. Maniacal. I wonder if the engineers that created them went home thinking "we're all sons-of-bitches and we're going to hell for what we've done." The FIA eventually put a maximum bore size on the 3.0L V10's of 98 mm, meaning that the maximum stroke would be 39.8 mm. Race Engine Technology did a review of the F1 engines at the end of the 2006 season, and said the Honda was the most powerful at 950 hp, and the BMW at 935.
Hey, except from the Wikipedia page, it's really hard to find informations on h design engines (2 flats on top of each other) would be nice if you made a video about it
You forgot about me when I switched from 6th to 1st gear in my Opel Astra at 160kmh
I did somthing similar when i put the car in second in 160kmh with my S40.. Just passed a car had topped out the 3rd gear and was gonna do a smooth shift to 4th gear just when i passed the car... The look on their face as i came down to about 100kmh with screetching tires and a wildly revving enginge was priceless. at that moment my volvo turned into a honda..
Wow... this made my day!
Lol happened to me bfore on my e30 was trying to change to 4th but i hitted 2nd gear and thank god i was around 3k rpm at that time, then it jumped to 5k almost reach to the rev limiter which is 7k weeewww!!
Okay, why does an opel Astra need 6 gears? Lol
@@vivekbarchha idk that was actually my uncle's car xd
Bike: *screams*
UA-cam captions :[Music]
UA-cam knows what’s up
Yesssir
Formula 1 V10 engines always makes me feel astonished. The sound has something that makes my jaw drop
That view from inside the intake of the injectors was pretty cool towards the end of the video. One of my favorite channels.
2:26, It literally just doesn't stop going. Absolutely amazing engine.
7:22 SO SATISFYING TO WATCH
I could watch it all day..
@@achillezx14r45 until you die
Sick fuel injector footage!
Yeah every time I see that I wonder how much fuel is wasted because the injectors are actually not inside the inlet tracts
@@phil955i they do some messy squirt
@@phil955i nearly none is wasted, it gets sucked in by the vacuum of the engine. you do see air and fuel coming back out, by bouncing of the valve, but it's not gonna fly off anywhere, it gets sucked back in
@@phil955i Overhead shower injection and downdraft heads/ports are quit common in hi-power N/A engines. Nothing is wastet there, it´s just simple physics. vacuum from the engine + gravity = max cylinder filling possible
Looks flammable lol
At that much RPM only dogs can hear it.
Yeah
Poor dogs
But 20 000 rpm is only 333 hz
It's time to stop Get some help r/woooosh
@@snoik1376 you are the one getting whooshed. Think real hard about how engines work.
I love the clip at the end. I used to watch that exact video all the time some years back. Such a beautiful sight and sound.
The shift sounds of the last clip had me in tears...
Wow. It does sound beautiful haha
We ALL miss the old F1
ua-cam.com/video/8uRvqPZcq_I/v-deo.html
20k rpm running
What about the RC Nitro engines revving up to 40,000 RPM?
What about dragsters? They Also run on nitrometan
Gas turbine 60s
@@szymon6207 RC gas turbines up to 300.000 RPM!
@@mcfast52 its not piston engine
@@mathi6832 they run about 10k revs i think, their engines are to big (to long stroke in particular) and with a ohv valvetrain you won't be doing 20k with an engine that big
07:23 The best music EVER!
There was no engine rpm regulation in F1 before 2007 which limit it to 18,000 rpm. BMW V10 engine was able to reach around 19,200 rpm on qualifying trim
I believe we are on bikes not cars
*19000rpm, 2009 is the year it limits to 18000rpm
One of the best video posts you’ve put on UA-cam. Thanks for sharing. Best of luck 🍀👍🏼
We need a high revving Honda V10!
Best part about small displacement bikes. Feels like youre racing in a moto gp race but doing 30-45 mph its so much fun around town.
@@Bennett8187 you should search ''adana mobile yarışları'' in youtube these are 50cc and do +80mph
I wish Honda just made some good ol' V8's for American vehicles.
ua-cam.com/video/8uRvqPZcq_I/v-deo.html
20k rpm running
Many years ago, I read a technical paper by Honda's chief engineer called something like "Design considerations for high-revving four-stroke engines (above 22,000 rpm)". Or four-cycle, depending which side of the Atlantic you live.
Very much enjoyed the Honda v-10 segment. Filming gave the impression of the old 50's military aeronautic testing.
Because that's what this cutting edge stuff is. It's paramount to aerospace on the ground.
Beautiful demonstration of engineering.
Did you know that aerospace turbines redline at 50k or more? Those engines are just built different.
@@The-fs5wn yes of course I would imagine if it's fair to say, that I acknowledge the major difference involved by what is a reciprocating event of revolutions that quantify a end result of time equal to a minute, regardless of point of inflection for the sake of duration being perhaps just the same in the case of a more simple turning rate, where in your aeronautic example, 50,000 RPM may also be the same inflection case of the turbine blades and associated vane cause/response... also allowing a brief peak touch at the 50k height no different than the brief touch of said reciprocating mass assembly turning the output end 20k RPM.
THE fact that I consider a aerospace delineage, is the fact that the extremes of any mechanical event regardless of mode of assembly, doesn't change the fact that aerospace tolerances and material adherence are just about always a inescapable consideration when the extremes also account for what is difficult or too many variables that cannot be reasonably seen and/or historically recorded.
Therefore in the case of building a long staircase, outside of a building in which it's design from the first floor to the second floor is just one continuous step and landing.
The importance of the stringer being the first cut of a 90° fact, in which how accurate that is in relation to the overall span and therefore the second cut can never be delineated out in space we therefore reference or trust the fact that our first 90 degree cut is dead on balls accurate in relation to the span or length of the entire series of step landings from the very first to the very last step.
Not so much because if we are off even a quarter degree of angle in relation to 90° and therefore the resulting step itself, one can certainly feel by primordial instinct in which even our eyes when dealing with a straight line that now takes another break in path but still in accordance to what is a 90° line in continuance moving forward despite the breaks in its given scenario such as starting from your ceiling and now down your bedroom wall in which the headboard of your bed runs parallel to that wall and now that line all the way down to the floor must now travel forward 90° square to its original line across your bedroom floor and back up the adjacent wall as if someone were cutting a section of your bedroom away but also perfectly 90° square in relation to your bedroom being let's say in this case a square three-dimensional box.
My point is even your eye in judgment where somewhere along that line when going down to the floor and now even off a very small degree in which it continues it's line across your floor but not square any longer, your eye in perception being the camera to your brain the processor doesn't need that line to go all the way across the room to be now obviously not square, and therefore no different than your foot when stepping up to a landing of a individual stair step, if the landing is even slightly tipping forward or back or to the side one way or the other from square, your foot being the probe or measure device will denote something is off and if it feels like it's tipping a hair forward your direction even slightly, it's because it is and generally never your imagination one way or the other just like it's off but you don't notice it, in just about all cases one will notice it whether it's by field or visually and more times than not immediately just like that line now ending at the bottom of your wall and beginning to make its way across your room it's not your imagination that within 12 in you will start to note more times than not there is an ever-increasing trajectory away from what should be square.
I am making what is a rather long point in order to establish what is fact for the record but not the ultimate important fact because if a 90° cut out is off in relation to what is 90° square of the entire length, we do not have to succumb that a little bit off in the beginning will inescapably lead to being completely way off at the top as a result and therefore we can try to correct and recapture back to square by at least counterbalancing what is a line vertically or descending away from what is logically square and or dead flat as in plane or horizon.
Maybe it wasn't our fault in the sense of diligence of the first cut and perhaps maybe our lack of procedure or experience knowing or theorizing the board length for the stringer itself is not exactly straight but slightly hued.
Maybe it is in fact straight because we are experienced enough to check it no matter what but not experienced enough until now to realize as the day got warmer so did the board and now because of a inherent warp within its grain structure now halfway up the entire length and all the cuts we made we now notice something is veering from its square trajectory and sure enough the board has begun to hue...
Here's my point, regardless of a reciprocating combustion style engine and or stringerboard for a continuous step landing outside our building from the first floor to the second floor, is not anything that resembles something that is going to orbit or fly around in outer space, it doesn't change the fact that most aerospace applications simply mean our adherence to what is close tolerance no different than the importance of square because no matter how those step landings resulting in a overall structure is now attached to the house even to the point of aerospace adherence in attachment and accounting for expansion and contraction and every possible known and unknown variable which is basically aerospace and or simply overkill to ensure what cannot be seen still gives us a chance of suitability and/or sustainability and/or survivability and all those positive things needed in order to ensure we are not shooting ourselves in the foot and we are not dooming ourselves before we even get started and so on and therefore all the aerospace intention in the world can never replace the fact that in the case of that step landing structure, the ever most important first cut and resulting 90° dead on balls next cut and the next one all the way to the top is a inescapable assurance that no matter what procedure or program in order of attachment to the building structure, The fact that those steps are all 90° square is an assurance of strength that nothing else can supersede or replace and therefore aerospace as an application is merely the implementation of every known engineering and physics fact advantage and therefore it all starts in inception where I'm sure in order for that piston engine to spin 20,000 RPM even just for a brief 10th of a second, I'm sure that cylinder block just in its own alloy composition was more than likely far more exceeding in integrity than perhaps it needed to be.
And for the record I would be damn surprised that 50,000 RPM for a turbine engine was hardly anything exceeding what I imagine may have been 100,000 RPM in reality
@@FIVE-0-APOCALYPTO Jesus fucking Christ how long did it take you to write this? Anyways, thanks for the copypasta.
1:43... and Harley Davidson is still trying to figure out push rods. 😂
Hi rev porno, loving it... to bad today's F1 engines sound like tuned lawn mowers...
That cbr250rr would sell like hotcakes now , the under 400cc market sucks for real bikes, except the new ktm rc390.
In Australia that breed of bike was very popular. The Honda, Yamaha and Kawasaki 4 cylinder 250cc were everywhere. But a 20+year old 250cc with 100k on the odometer is pretty long in the tooth. Now the 2 cylinder 250 and 300cc bikes are so cheap and everyone is opting for them.
Frankly the old breed is a much better, and now can be bought for about 1-2 grand. Maybe even less
id swap my r3 in an eyeblink 😊
@@baecchi4153
Check out these bikes.
www.bikesales.com.au/bikes/?q=%28Service%3D%5BBikesales%5D%26%28Make%3D%5BYamaha%5D%26Model%3D%5BFZR400%5D%29%29&sortby=Price
I own an MC22 and I've ridden with the new Honda 250r's, R3's and ninja 400's and frankly the almost 30 year old 250 was faster than all of them. If you have the choice and the money get the RR or the old 250 ninja, they're the most fun you can have for under 5k
@@jadedejarlais2769
My personal favourite was the FZR250RR (3ln3 model, with the delta box frame). Loved that bike.
Eargasm @7:26
Honda V-10 Inlet + Pure Headers = 🌋
The people who disliked it should stick to riding their tricycles.
Matt 958 haha
Matt 958 we drive cars like normal people
Boomers.
They got to be going at least 30 miles per hour
Lmao
The MC22 CBR 250RR is a wicked fast bike for it's size a stock one can easily reach like 110mph.
Enough torque to yank the skin off rice soup.
Gotta be screaming to make some real motivation. That's the downside of very high rpm engines, they are not efficient at all until that small displacement is actually digesting a decent volume of air/fuel.
VisioRacer: Suggestions for future videos: smallest trucks (probably japanese), largest trucks (Cat 797, Belaz 75601 & the likes), weirdest trucks, weird/large pick-up trucks (including International CXT), weird engine or drivetrain configurations (like Tatra's drive tube), etc. Keep up the good work, you've got a talent for fetching interesting stuff.
Seeing that Honda F1 engine up close was the coolest most exciting thing i have ever seen. Seeing the fuel just SHOOTING into the cylinders and the motor just screaming out the exhaust
Engines are fucking awesome man
The Suzuki 50 cc race bike was as fast as the 250 fireblade , mad how quick those old factory bikes were !
This is such an incredibly interesting channel that is literally overflowing with information. Have a great Christmas and a happy new year!!!
Dudes With a civic at 3 in the moorning:
Great video! You deliver cold information right alongside incredible sounds & eye - pleasing video, thank you.
The first one sounded like a kid screaming
16hp at 23k rpm
nah, sounds more like a kazoo
It sounded like a goat
More like a mosquito
After that one they limited the number of gears in the gearbox. It was Swiss watch precision in a motorcycle ....
O final .. lembra quem mesmo?🤔...... sensacional...!!.
Hj ... agente.não torce... só asiste!!!!
That Kwacker 250 wins the coolest sounding bike test. Great vid!
Music to the ears and soul~
High rpms are the best!
V10 era f1 was allowed unlimited revs, 2006 allowed unlimited v8s.
My favourite was the Ilmor Mercedes v10 of years 2000/2001. The best v10 sound evvveeererer!!!
Honda RC 166 always gives me goosebumps.
I H-A-T-E the current F1 exhaust note...sounds like my dog taking a wet dump!
The CBR250RR Sounds Like A 4 Rotor!
One of my favorite channels on UA-cam!
What do you drive, Visio?
2000 model Triumph TT600, 14,500 redline, & with tune guys were running 17,500, but blowing engines in the 18k+ range, the 2001 & newer had milder cams, so need to find a 2000 cam, if get a 2001-2004 bike, they FUN! I regret selling, but I was playing hard on streets, sold before I got killed
VisioRacer I love your channel brother keep up the great work!!!
Ah i like these older videos whitout faces only The engines and vehicles.
Just want to say love the videos doing a great job keep it up
Thank you!
The rc166 is and sounds absolutely legendary
Guy Coulon once made a spectacular motorbike engine.
6 cylinders, 300cc, and 22.000rpm.
and it's sounds mesmerizing..😍😍
Great video as always ! Merry xmas !
Four strokes sound sooo much better than two strokes.. I know this is somehow subjective . But i will never understand how anyone will prefer that two stroke sound over any of the four strokes in this video
Ive gone dirt bike riding on two Stokes and it is much better at ~ 8000 rpm than these 20000 ones.
Dean Grimsell BLOW ME
@@homefront3162 Why? You gay?
ua-cam.com/video/8uRvqPZcq_I/v-deo.html
20k rpm running
The honda RC166 in the dino gave me goosebumps for 2 mins..damn!!!😱
OHHH that exhaust glowing RED. Orange!!!!
OHHHH MY!!!
This video should be in spotify.
I saw some of these machines in 1967in the Isle of Man fantastic sound
That F1 engine eargasm tho, really Miss the old days
In 2006 Renault was able to reach the 20.000+ Rpm mark with their V8( also on race trim) but not with the V10 engine in 2005.
Nice. I love the F1 engines that were allowed to scream!
Thank you for featuring my kwakka 250c again!
whats wrong with me, i always gets tears of joy when i hear this sick revs
Very nice video but you have forgotten about the 100cc karting engines which are going up to 24000 rpm. These engines sounds amazing 😉
2:25 ... sounded sooo fucking good
ua-cam.com/video/8uRvqPZcq_I/v-deo.html
20k rpm running
Visio we miss you!
Interesting the 20k barrier in F1 was first reached by a V8 from Cosworth, I always thought BMW cracked that with the 2005 engine. V10, 1000hp, 20k rpm.
Who knows,with what they
delivered on the track..one
can only imagine.I guess
they did'nt felt the need to
brag about dyno exploits.
ua-cam.com/video/8uRvqPZcq_I/v-deo.html
20k rpm running
@@Dsky-vu3nz That must be 2006, so that is a V8. In Qualifying?
7:24 BRUTAL
Oh the glory days of F1 :O
Love that RC166.
Love rc166 sound one of best😍😍😍😍
And the NR 500 with oval pistons?
Just liked my own comment
And I saw it race for the first time, and Mick Grant crashed it in front of me. The Japanese engineers ran across the track while the GP was still in progress.
Just liked my own comment! Again!
Oval pistons?
@@antonman1234 ..... Yes oval pistons and 8 valves per cylinder. Look for it on the Internet (Honda NR 500)
I love my cbr250rr, best bike :D
AWESOME,I do prefer the 900 blade.
Fantastic video
1:16 Modern moped engines:Why do I hear boss music?
These are so ridiculous I love it.
The Suzuki 50cc bike sounds like a balloon when you just open it a little and makes fart noises
0:45 the mosquito in my room when I'm trying to sleep
2:27 i didn't think it was ever going to stop
With the recent announcement of the new Kawasaki zx25R I had to go back and watch this to hold me over till I can pick up a 25R in Canada.
There was no rev limit in F1 until the 2nd year of 2.4L V8s in 2007.
Bro I like your video very much love to watch
In other words, Honda is master and king of high revving engines.
F1 send a hug
@VisioRacer I am not sure the bike at 2:27 is an RC166, I think it may be a CBX !
What are these, pistons for ants ?
Haha, fantastic compilation!
At 4:03 .... Looks like Abadare Park in South Wales..... I go every year to watch at one of the maddest tracks you'll ever see.!!
My first bike was a Honda baby fire blade, it was a 4 stroke that revved to 21,000 rpm
Insane!
Can you do something
about PUCH and TOMOS ?
Honda is the most genius company in history. The genius of Soichira Honda and his racing spirit are unparalleled and it reflects in everything they ever made. They made the most advanced motorcycles of all time, dominate MotoGP with the record number of titles, Isle of Man TT, first car they ever made revved to 9500 rpm and beat cars with twice the amount of power. They went on dominating every single motorsports to dominating Ferrari in Formula 1 as well as at their own supercar game with the NSX. I don't care what gtr fanboys and Ferrari fanboys say. They always got owned by Honda anyway. Lol. SMART people know that Honda is the most legendary name in history of automobile and motorsports. No other brand even comes close to their genius and the art they create. (Maybe alfa romeo and ferrari had the passion but they never had the engineering genius and technical knowledge of Honda)
I heard "...at least twenty on the taco-meter.".
Sounds delicious.
2:07 that sounds glorious
2:52 with subtitles said music( for me at least )
2:15 by dar the best sounding in my opinion. It sounds like a 70s or 80s f1 car
My 2010 250r only went to 14,500rpm before the limiter. But it was the fastest 250cc ninja in South Carolina at the time. Imagine going 150mph on a 250ninja lol. And that was slightly within a half mile. Took me $4,500 on a brand new bike and another $4,000 in upgrades to do it but it went from 29hp stock to 89hp and some gear change did it.
4:57 a 4:58.. the frame... woooooooow !
Some awesome stuff!!!!
Have you stopped making vids or are you just taking a break?
Superb video!
Oh those F1 V10's! Scariest sounding engines of all time. Maniacal. I wonder if the engineers that created them went home thinking "we're all sons-of-bitches and we're going to hell for what we've done." The FIA eventually put a maximum bore size on the 3.0L V10's of 98 mm, meaning that the maximum stroke would be 39.8 mm. Race Engine Technology did a review of the F1 engines at the end of the 2006 season, and said the Honda was the most powerful at 950 hp, and the BMW at 935.
Hey, except from the Wikipedia page, it's really hard to find informations on h design engines (2 flats on top of each other) would be nice if you made a video about it
ここにZX25Rが入る事になると思うと胸熱
Thanks bro for this video ! :D
2 Cilinder 50cc engine. I like that.
do you have a highcut on your mic at 6000hz?
love your vids
The faster an engine revs the faster it wears out. Proven fact !!
You never owned an mc19 or mc22 then lol. Bikes engines are bulletproof