I tried with my own generated images, and it´s not even close of what I said, but then, using the prompts it gives me, it has amazing and beautiful results, so I don´t care if it´s close, even more, I´m happy it gives me new ideas. As an artist, this AI world is really exciting, it gives me SO many ideas for my own creations.
I totally agree! Sometimes it gives other results than expected but they're even better than what we wanted. I'm embracing that too. Using AI to get inspired for your art is so nice too!
Hi Unmesh, there is something that is missed in this video that I think is worth mentioning.... but for MidJourney, using either "--test" or the new "--v 4" models give SIGNIFICANTLY better results than the standard --v 3 model. I got amazingly high detailed and dynamic results that are much much closer to the original image.
Adding a reference image is a bit tricky because if you give the reference image full strength, you essentially get the exact same results as the origin image, where with no weight, the origin image is pretty much ignored. Stable Diffusions image to image section is, in my opinion, it's most powerful tool. With a proper prompt and an origin image, you can have results which in their overall composition are radically different from the origin image, yet have a theme from that image. For example, an origin image of blackberries with a proper prompt can result in an image of fine dining china that has blackberries as a theme for their decoration. The Origin image and the Generated image will be 99% different except for that one detail.
I'm curious as to PiXimperfect's opinion on using living artist's name to generate AI Artwork? Specially given the gray line of legality, ethics, and morals for how some of these companies (ie: Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, etc.) acquired the image data sets. As well as using living artist's copyrighted artwork to train their AI Art models, and in the end create a for-profit product.
It is quite simple: since AI steals pieces of real artists' work and combines them it violates copyright law (more precisely - it creates a derivative work).
@@pixeldojo which gets bypassed with literally any touch up on photoshop since it now had human interaction. I might of paraphrased it but I'm driving in the crazy streets of Miami so sorry lol
@@BalkanWizard that's a false equivalence. In a real world you can't attribute protections, laws, or many other things when comparing a person to a system of machine learning. They are not the same, and the law sees them differently. I'd encourage you to look into how Stability AI and others gathered the image sets (which contains copyrighted artwork, and in many cases personal information) though data laundering, by means of shielding themselves from accountability by using nonprofit research entities.
@@pixeldojo > *It is quite simple: since AI steals pieces of real artists' work and combines them it violates copyright law (more precisely - it creates a derivative work).* Well, except no, it doesn't - that's not how the technology works. Images are fed to create data - that is used to train the AI to recognize shapes, combinations of objects, styles, etc - and then discards the data. If it kept the image data, the training dataset wouldn't be 2-10GB, but many terabytes to petabytes in size. It'd literally be impossible to distribute it like it is with some of these training models. Interestingly, creating a derivative work isn't **always** a copyright infringement.
@@gondoravalon7540 except when AI models are prone to memorization and over-fitting using copyrighted artwork. The merits of it being a derivative work becomes murky at that point. The "Bloodborne" (Playstation game art) case is a good example of that.
Image 2 prompt works better for standalone Stable Diffusion for me at least, clip interrogator gives me results much closer to what I want in Stable Diffusion
00:00:00 - Introduction: Using Image to Prompt Websites 00:00:29 - Generating Prompts from Uploaded Images 00:00:54 - Creating Art with AI Platforms 00:01:17 - Image to Prompt: Demonstration 00:01:41 - Using Image to Prompt for Artistic Inspiration 00:02:06 - Clip Interrogator: Detailed Prompt Generation 00:03:05 - Testing Prompts in Mid-Journey 00:04:12 - Adding Image References in Mid-Journey 00:05:43 - Clip Interrogator vs Image to Prompt: Comparison 00:06:12 - Testing Prompts in Dream Studio (Stable Diffusion) 00:07:15 - Adjusting Image Strength in Stable Diffusion 00:07:46 - Testing Prompts in DALL-E 00:08:21 - Conclusion: Image to Prompt Technology and Ethical Considerations
@@LeoGarciaPhotos okayyyy... Well thanks for the update. I haven't personally explored the world of AI generated "art" so I'm a bit dumb in that field.
@@KonradJablo I do know art licensing exists, I do this kind of thing professionally. It’s fine if the artist has licensed their art for Ai programs like this. But the unfortunate fact is a lot of these Ai art programs learn by being given images from artists that haven’t done so, which is the main problem with Ai art. If the artists have sold their art or otherwise given permission via contract for Ai gen purposes, then there’s no problem with using Ai
@@sabbiano1257 "/imagine a guy screaming on a bridge, colors swirl, hands to face, scream, scream, expressionism." - boom, I'm an artist. If anyone uses that prompt they owe me royalties. 🙄
You are missing the point. Traditional art and digital both involve the same manual process. I still need to sketch, compose, choose my color swatch have skills to do what I do. Even photography involves composition. "Prompt engineers" can just be any rando that copies some text from chat gpt and pastes it in mj sd dalle
@@charlesscott4929 im all about it... My YT channel has been dedicated to teaching AI for creative purposes for months now... Everyone is evolving... I work in animation and film professionally and AI has been a major topic for the whole community... I love Unmesh and have been a long time fan... My point was these massive channels are even getting into discussing AI since they also know it 100% is the future and is turning the creative world upside down... It is quite fascinating...
Lol I left my restaurant job to see if I could do art full time, but the way Ai is advancing it’s hard to see a future in that 😂 I’m making sure I know how to use all the Ai though
Wow, this is really interesting! I can't believe how well the AI was able to generate text prompts based on the images. It's amazing to see how far AI has come and the creative possibilities it opens up. I can't wait to see what other innovative uses of AI will be developed in the future!
Quick note, if the image is a png, chances are the prompt and config are embedded. Might be worth checking that out first. Thanks for another great video!
For all of the people saying that we're "stealing" other artist's work... I happen to be an artist with over 30 years experience and did a test. I loaded 6 different -- yet obviously themed -- album covers that I created for a band (no I will not say which one for privacy reasons) into img2prompt. img2prompt kicked out some very good descriptions BUT attributed my work to 6 different artists that I have never heard of, seen their work, and I most definitely did not "copy their style" or anyone else's. I've worked well over 20 years via my network connections only i.e. no social media, marketing, or adverts. Those that contact me know why and for what reason. However, as some other artists have pointed out, the people that are the most active on the internet (or famous masters) are the ones getting attributed with the AI algorithms. Not the true "originators" of a style... the OG copyright holders if you will... that popularised a "look or style". I personally have no problem with that, and I'm starting to use AI in my own work as an idea generator, and thank Unmesh and other channels for making the experimentation easier. Will I be replaced eventually? Absolutely! And counting on it. But I'll also be moving forward into the future with other creative endeavours. My motto my entire career: Never stand still, or you'll get run over.
Same here. Almost 20 years in the entertainment industry as an artist and now using Stable Diffusion to speed up my "side hustle creator-owner" IP. I've tried this img2prompt with my own art and it was funny. My style is way different from Ilya Kuvshinov, but this img2prompt attributed my work to him haha
@@Amelia_PC If these companies can take the IP of artists and use it to train the AI for personal gain. Then they can also take your IP. Allowing companies to do this undermines regular people's rights.
@@Thesamurai1999 Yup, you're right. That's the reason you have to copyright your entire IP when you create one. I own my IP rights way before AI, with text and images registered. If someone copies the style, story, or characters I developed for my IP, I'll sue them. Same for everyone who has an IP. When I generate any image using AI, I use deceased artists in my prompts (like pre raphaelite painters). But I prefer to train AI with my own art style since I have easily over 5,000 drawings because I'm a comic book artist. Each panel counts. If you're an artist, I suggest you add something to the image description that indicates you don't want to enter on AI training database. The law is changing and they're planning to add it. If an artist doesn't want to participate, he or she can't have their art used to train an AI. And that's great :)
So here we sit, gleefully watching in wide-eyed wonderment as technology makes more and more humans obsolete. We can't help ourselves, because we LOVE science fiction, and it's all becoming a reality right before our very eyes. Your children will tell stories to their disbelieving grandchildren about how they used to write music, paint, and build things before the Silicon Oligarchy made ordinary humans obsolete.
Imagine how impossible mobile touch screens and internet was and now are everyday tools. You forget that humans learn and improve too with all tools available for everyone. People are more creative than ever with tech.
@@hombacom It's not fear, it's a reality. A tool is something a human uses to do work with their skills and according to their will. A screwdriver is a tool. You can use it to screw things. If you ask your employee to screw something, are you doing the job through him? Is he a tool? No, he's doing the work, he's a worker. Now let's say you fire your employee and buy a robot, and you ask the robot to screw something. If you just tell it what to do and you see it doing it completely external to you, are you screwing things using it? Or is it screwing everything while you watch? Yeah the robot in that case isn't a tool, it's a replacement for a human worker. It's the same with AI art, you see. Someone with no artistic training but lots of money needs one or several images done, so he hires an artist or group of artists to do the job. But why do that when they could just ask an AI to do it? He's got no artistic training, he won't be able to tell if something is really good, or just flashy. He may think he knows, but he doesn't. You may say "well then he hires an artist to supervise everything!" Yeah that's called art supervisor and it's one job of many. Still kicking a lot of people out. And I hope no one suggests all artists become art supervisors because that would show a lack of knowledge about hierarchies at the industry Yeah why isn't everyone at mcdonalds a manager? Why isn't everyone at the office the boss? That's laughable. "Then they should just give up art and learn other skills" yeah still a bunch of people are now looking for jobs and the number of jobs offered isn't growing. Wait until new different AIs take other people's jobs and see unemployment rates rise. Super fun for the economy eh? Who's going to pay to see the new 99% AI generated pixar movie? AI is a replacement, not a tool. Saying otherwise is deceitful. Cheers.
@@AM-kb9cz AI is a lot of different things so I dont see the point of simplify like that. For someone Photoshop is a tool. If you just “ask the AI” you get often odd or boring average of everything it learned, but you can spend a lot of time to tweak it if you want. But it feels like random one hit wonders and hard to make images that belong to each other. Is it ethically right to train on public images, maybe not. I don’t like AI hype or to make fun of artists. Some jobs are in danger but I don’t see that humans become obsolete.
Sad thing is today deviant art is FULL of AI whether the users admit it or not, its quite obvious. Earlier this year b4 i found out about it(sad i know) i was amazed at all this work people were doing. then i noticed this lil description ai generated and was like -- hmm wait u mean this is all ai created- what is that exactly? and i dove deep. At the surface level its just fun at how easy it is, 2nd level i realize all those phone apps are basically this( i don't own a smartphone- so im kinda behind) :D, 3rd level is actually trying to make your images unique with specific phrases/ words and getting rid of obvious hints that its ai and not a photograph (photography is what i like), i'm still diving deeper trying to find the bottom
Very interesting :) in reversing the process. l believe if you used the V3 or V4 (--v 4) in midjourney the result may looks way better also specifying the quality while writing the prompt will defiantly affecting the result.
There are two types of ai artists the ones who make their prompts from scratch and those who just copy prompts. You can tell which one is hated by the ai art community lol
Thanks so much for this video. I have struggled with how to describe my art for a long time. I have even hired people from time to time to write descriptions for me. I will give these tools a go and see how they do.
There needs to be regulations which will protect human artists' rights, which will prevent use of Copyrighted artworks in datasets and artists names in prompts unless they consent to it. Otherwise, yes it is stealing when you build the whole program using Artists' intellectual properties without their consent and plus making huge amount of money without compensating them. It is art theft, exploitation and simply unethical. It is clearly stealing when you can use artist names in prompts and sometimes generated result is basically a copy of original work or slightly modified and merged with other human artists' works. Maybe There needs to be another AI or program developed for detecting copyrighted components in generated AI art. If the content is too similar to existing copyright material or if the AI can detect what kind of training material was fed into it, it throws out a claim at the company or prompt user. Like the UA-cam which has algorithms that automatically review videos and blast copyright claims for audio use.
When there will be regulation that human artist can't learn how to draw looking at other people's works? Because this is literally how Stable Diffusion models are. They aren't copying. They are learning the general concept.
The key is to use negative prompt in Stable Diffusion. Midjourney model is doing it behind the scenes probably, because it's way easier to use and get great results.
Where is the human 's place, years of learning process and be stolen by some machine, typing something on the box doesn't make them become an artist honestly
doesn't really make them artists, but it does make them express themselves and get what's on their minds out in an observable way without them having to spend years learning all the techniques, I'm an artist and I support that so not everyone has to have the effort I had to get great results and expressed themselves
This was insightful being that I play around with other AI image generators... and they are definitely more miss than hit and I keep wondering if it's my prompts haha This was good. Keep rocking!
@@Lioness_of_Gaia The decision to use or not an AI application is up to each person but here there are several factors that cannot be denied, a legislation on the unauthorized use of pieces of art that obviously affect the artists who created them, and the background of the creation of the different AI engines as a race of which one gets the best software regardless of the consequences that affect the artists. Morality is left aside when there is a market, it is the truth, the real artist is in the second place.
He is 'devaluing' even his own work that he does with photoshop and I don't see him crying like most people here. Go to therapy and tell your psychologist how an AI took your job because you couldn't adapt to technology.
@@sabbiano1257 That's because you're selfish and exaggerated at the same time. You don't need therapy, just be aware. This devalues a sea of visual artists who spent years and years learning techniques and put their history into the art they produce. Now any busy teenager, just wanting to like on Instragam, shares 30 "arts" in a month, selling cheap, without giving any value, because he didn't make the effort for that. So it's easy, these people use a program that just needs you to be literate.
@@marcosfront1 Then don't use the AI, my friend. You just answered yourself. Do you do your art for money and likes on instagram only? If so you are going to be a frustrated envious with life and others just because someone or something is better than you. I have been forging my way for 20 years in a job that has been industrialized for decades and I never stopped working because of the progress of technology, I have adapted and those technological tools I use them in my work to improve every day. Now go cry somewhere else please, because I do not understand what you do watching a video of something that causes you so much frustration and envy because you do not have the talent to compete or excel over this AI.
As an artist, you have been stealing everyone's work you have ever seen. There Is No Difference. The fact that AI does it better and faster doesn't change this.
@@LeoGarciaPhotos There is a difference from learning colouring techniques and adapting them with your own, or having pose references, etc. than literally ripping out parts and complete art styles from a certain artist (as you can see, you just put the name of an artist as a promt and that's it). If you'd use AI for a reference for a project to get something REAL done by commissioning a real artist that might be okay to a certain extent.. BUT selling AI art? Using it for commercial benefits? Absolutely not. And speaking of making it better.. The amount of scuffed AI art i saw is ridiculous.
"steal Ai art" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 the copyright of the arts used to train the AI is guaranteed, using AI art as your own is plagiarism, OpenAi has set up a chat, if you ask the following question "Art made by AI that has been trained with copyrighted art is plagiarism?" the answer is the same
i disagree, Working with AI is like hiring a concept artist on your project. There fore it is using your resources to help you. There for it's a collab. Also if you actually take that base work and add to it, then it's transformative, then it's really your work at that point.
@@DanknDerpyGamer if the AI was trained with its own database or using images from artists with permission, the copyright of the generated images belongs to the developers and their stakeholders. but if they have not had such permission and have not used their own database, is considered plagiarism regardless of how Ai works and anyone trying to claim copyright on these images is subject to legal consequences
@@SENYSENofficial I don't think you understand how AI generated images work. The majority of these AI images were generated using the open-source Stable Diffusion model. The datasets used in this process, LAION-5B and LAION-Aesthetics, consist of publicly available URLs paired with tags that are also open for access. Plus, it is currently permitted in most countries as long as the final product is significantly transformed from the original images. This is demonstrated by the inability to accurately recreate famous works of art, such as the Mona Lisa, using these models. It should be noted that the minimal SD model file is only 2GB, meaning that it is not possible to maintain reasonable quality while condensing 5 billion images into this small size. These models utilize a set of differential equations to map language tokens to local features, which represents the minimal amount of information necessary to reproduce the core characteristics of an image or piece of language. The use of AI to generate images does not constitute plagiarism due to the creation of new and transformed images through the utilization of algorithms and input data. While these images may be influenced by or incorporate aspects of preexisting images, they are not direct reproductions and therefore do not infringe upon copyright laws.
How would there be? The resulting image is original. You’re not republishing the prompt. You’re generating an image based on the prompt. If you’re nervous, just change a word or an attribute.
Ai scraped copyrighted works, medical files and private photos , so even if you don't get a copy of an existing work there are still a lot of legal issues to worry about
Is there any AI platform out there that you can FEED it an image, and it will tell you the best FONTS to use with that image and the best colors for those fonts? So basically an AI typography?
Saying what's visible on the painting is not an explanation. Most importantly the creator must be able to tell his share of life story why the creator did that work exactly. Any creator who can do that can basically do any task based on logic and reason. I think artists can easily sue these stuff and the people behind it for looking very similar to and inspired by their artwork and pretty much imitating their art styles and horribly mimicking their elements for commercial purposes.
Except, how are you going to sue the originators of the style that the current artist being sued is using? No artist creates in a vacuum. They all "steal" (learn) from somewhere and/or someone before them.
@@jeromefernando6232 Learning from data is definitely not stealing. Neither is learning from an artist's style because a specific style or look is not copyrightable.
I also think so! Real artists build their own style basing on experience in life. To put words in a machine and steal the style of one real human beings is a crime. Yes, we learn from our brothers and sisters, but we don't take their identity and say we are like her or him. So human worth is kicked by simpletons who have no idea of the true meaning of art. (We don't take doping to win the race). Why should an artist need such automatic toys. The mentality of real creatives is full of ideas, and they learn skills to express them because they are inspired of the thought, that they can communicate with their OWN work: personality, ideas, mood, feelings, statements, entertainment, etc. Know an AI what mood, soul, passion really means?
image weight is not available at the moment with V4, the default value is 0.5 right now i think, u can always try in older version and then remaster it with V4, Good luck
I can't help but think no one will be able to draw or paint in 20 years. It's all going to be ai. We can already use it to generate videos, text and images. Who is going to want to invest years in practice and study. Who's going to bother developing a style?
You're right! To use AI is NOT that kind of art, REAL artists would do. Real creatives don't need this because they (we) have their (our) own skills (no matter what level) and own creativity. AI users are NO artists and never will because they don't learn it. Their art and other creations does not arise in their minds, as they believe and claim, but simply uses an automaton that does the thinking for them, and soon the feeling too. Would you teach your child to use such tools? Maybe there will soon be AI designer drugs or an AI reality where simpletons will convince themselves that they can now create reality. Yes, they even steal the art style from REAL artists. That's ridiculous, soulless and already in the direction to steal the identity of humans. That is a crime. If there is an end time is that now and AI is a lousy part and reason because it's creating insanity and delusions of grandeur. It's lazy, decadent, and proves to be part of a time when people stop being people. They will be cruising around in AI wheelchairs since walking is just too demanding for them, although they have healthy legs (I don't mean people with health problems, they are not guilty of it). Friendly greetings and a wonderful day!
Me, I'll continue to make art, cause I enjoy makeing art not just the finished piece. And I hope more artists will remember to fall in love with the process along with the product. Also don't forget about the human element of art that load of collectors and commissioners enjoy and are very much a part of the process.
Yes. Exactly this. If this AI thing continues, there may still be a lot of human hobbyist artists, for sure. But will there be people pushing their skills and imagination far enough to push the art scene in any direction? No, if they can't make a living out of it. And since AI art parasites real people's art to create images, it'll either lose quality or stagnate forever.
@@AM-kb9cz You can't always take the easiest path that is possible. Is a country richer if it prints tons of banknotes and would make everyone millionaires. This absurd economic idea would come to an end quickly, since the money would of course be worthless. But AI users live this lazy and doomed attitude. Soon they will hate each other because everyone wants to be the best, which will no longer be easy among millions of equally lazy toy artists. The ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, which features Michelangelo with a remarkable painting depicting a few hundred passages from the Bible, is also a wonderful masterpiece, as he lay on his back, struggling with the quality of the colors of the time, some of which dripped onto his face. This attitude is unmatched, but a sign of a personality willing to give something for probably no great payment. Of course, most of us artists are not geniuses like Michelangelo. That's not what I was talking about. It is his passion to show us the value of true art, rather than people pulling a few paintings out of a machine. It's a question of respect, and many other reasons, why AI art will soon be worthless.
@@vinricvannorth5495 I agree that if the economic system is changed and all of our needs are covered then yeah, people who are passionate about art will be able to dedicate his life to hone their skills and at least among them there would be an increased interest in human made art. If the economy continues as is, people will need money to eat and survive, so if they aren't able to do it because people are more willing to use AI rather than hire a human being to do art, artists will have to find other jobs taking away time from their passion. The sistine chapel is a masterpiece of course, but it was commissioned. It was not done for free iirc.
Saying that using other people's prompts is stealing is so pretentious considering that the AI just steals people's artstyles without consent. (I know it doesn't steal art, just the "styles", just legal theft basically).
To quote from my favorite 1994 movie, "The Little Rascals" with regards to creating appropriate txt2art prompts, one needs a "rather extensive vocabulary, a phenomenal grasp of grammar and superlative command of syntax". Or just let 'clip interrogator' do it for you! Thanks for sharing this approach!
AI still has trouble with the number of horses' legs, human arms, and legs. Objects are still hit-and-miss. A learning process that is getting better by the day. By next year, human artists will be lost careers.
I don't see people losing their jobs just yet. There's a lot of legal problems with using AI for profit > a lot of prompts involve 'Disney' and 'Artstation'. I don't see Disney being very happy with just anyone being able to use their name to turn a profit. The bigger question is how will those corporations use these programs. Google and others, 100% saw this coming so how are they currently using it? I mean a computer can play chess better than any human ever born and to be born so why is chess still a sport? Ai may learn quick but humans tend to be slow and sentimental so will be interesting to see how and when it's used.
@@Sabrina-wh1jh Has anyone been sued over this yet? The only way you can sue for copyright infringement is if the work is registered with the copyright office. That isn't happening because the copyright office will not register works by AI or non-humans.
@@marcosfront1 i think that is a bad example artists live on how much products they can sell. sure they can still do ot as a hobby but hobby artists can never be as good as a artist that spends most of day drawing for a job because a hobby artists need to work another job to make a living and pay bills. i think they say you need to draw 5 hours a day to become good at drawing in 3 years or something . and that's only drawing painting will take more time no one with a job has 5 hours free in their day .
You should of tell it that its illustration not a painting ( cause there are visible outlines), also non realistic style in negative prompting, id try pixar and vallejo comics illustration
just remember AI "art" is just stealing data of other artists who worked on them for hours, and it is not the same as artists being inspired morality is up to you, although law regulations are on thier way
for the short of images I've been trying to backwards engineer, these were a phenomenal waste of time. Didn't get anywhere close to the results I needed.
Gotta love all the digital “artists” accusing AI models of “stealing” their style … while simultaneously slapping on a layered image of someone else’s Pinterest photo to flip, filter, and set to “overlay” and paint on top of for “inspiration”, “texture”, and “happy accidents”
I think that the possibility to use the style or the name of an ARTIST ALIVE, should be forbid. I use often, Ai to text image, but after this video I realize how bad is to use the assets of another artist... For the rest, great video and content as always :)
> I think that the possibility to use the style or the name of an ARTIST ALIVE, should be forbid. Why? (one doesn't "own" a style in the sense one owns a copyright or a piece of physical property)
I tried with my own generated images, and it´s not even close of what I said, but then, using the prompts it gives me, it has amazing and beautiful results, so I don´t care if it´s close, even more, I´m happy it gives me new ideas. As an artist, this AI world is really exciting, it gives me SO many ideas for my own creations.
I totally agree! Sometimes it gives other results than expected but they're even better than what we wanted. I'm embracing that too. Using AI to get inspired for your art is so nice too!
Hi Unmesh, there is something that is missed in this video that I think is worth mentioning.... but for MidJourney, using either "--test" or the new "--v 4" models give SIGNIFICANTLY better results than the standard --v 3 model. I got amazingly high detailed and dynamic results that are much much closer to the original image.
Thanks - do you have an example full prompt?
Adding a reference image is a bit tricky because if you give the reference image full strength, you essentially get the exact same results as the origin image, where with no weight, the origin image is pretty much ignored. Stable Diffusions image to image section is, in my opinion, it's most powerful tool. With a proper prompt and an origin image, you can have results which in their overall composition are radically different from the origin image, yet have a theme from that image. For example, an origin image of blackberries with a proper prompt can result in an image of fine dining china that has blackberries as a theme for their decoration. The Origin image and the Generated image will be 99% different except for that one detail.
I'm curious as to PiXimperfect's opinion on using living artist's name to generate AI Artwork?
Specially given the gray line of legality, ethics, and morals for how some of these companies (ie: Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, etc.) acquired the image data sets. As well as using living artist's copyrighted artwork to train their AI Art models, and in the end create a for-profit product.
It is quite simple: since AI steals pieces of real artists' work and combines them it violates copyright law (more precisely - it creates a derivative work).
@@pixeldojo which gets bypassed with literally any touch up on photoshop since it now had human interaction. I might of paraphrased it but I'm driving in the crazy streets of Miami so sorry lol
@@BalkanWizard that's a false equivalence. In a real world you can't attribute protections, laws, or many other things when comparing a person to a system of machine learning. They are not the same, and the law sees them differently.
I'd encourage you to look into how Stability AI and others gathered the image sets (which contains copyrighted artwork, and in many cases personal information) though data laundering, by means of shielding themselves from accountability by using nonprofit research entities.
@@pixeldojo > *It is quite simple: since AI steals pieces of real artists' work and combines them it violates copyright law (more precisely - it creates a derivative work).*
Well, except no, it doesn't - that's not how the technology works. Images are fed to create data - that is used to train the AI to recognize shapes, combinations of objects, styles, etc - and then discards the data. If it kept the image data, the training dataset wouldn't be 2-10GB, but many terabytes to petabytes in size. It'd literally be impossible to distribute it like it is with some of these training models.
Interestingly, creating a derivative work isn't **always** a copyright infringement.
@@gondoravalon7540 except when AI models are prone to memorization and over-fitting using copyrighted artwork. The merits of it being a derivative work becomes murky at that point. The "Bloodborne" (Playstation game art) case is a good example of that.
They just stole the new created jobs like prompt specialists.
LOL at this point, the dynamics between emergence and downfall of hole job markets has become impossible to follow.
Guess I'll take a sit and wait approach, optimistically assuming the curve will flatten instead of the singularity.
@@jichaelmorgan3796 Collecting money approach is better.
Jobs can't get stolen, since they aren't things and are not a property.
They made new jobs... then kill it. This is life now.
Image 2 prompt works better for standalone Stable Diffusion for me at least, clip interrogator gives me results much closer to what I want in Stable Diffusion
00:00:00 - Introduction: Using Image to Prompt Websites
00:00:29 - Generating Prompts from Uploaded Images
00:00:54 - Creating Art with AI Platforms
00:01:17 - Image to Prompt: Demonstration
00:01:41 - Using Image to Prompt for Artistic Inspiration
00:02:06 - Clip Interrogator: Detailed Prompt Generation
00:03:05 - Testing Prompts in Mid-Journey
00:04:12 - Adding Image References in Mid-Journey
00:05:43 - Clip Interrogator vs Image to Prompt: Comparison
00:06:12 - Testing Prompts in Dream Studio (Stable Diffusion)
00:07:15 - Adjusting Image Strength in Stable Diffusion
00:07:46 - Testing Prompts in DALL-E
00:08:21 - Conclusion: Image to Prompt Technology and Ethical Considerations
Really. This cycle would never end it seems. Soon we'd see "AI generates new AI system from AI images"
already has been done. DA's new generator adds the generations back into the model.
@@LeoGarciaPhotos okayyyy... Well thanks for the update. I haven't personally explored the world of AI generated "art" so I'm a bit dumb in that field.
Derivative art is my favorite art
Yep, just an endless cycle of soulless crap.
Doesn’t adding artist descriptors like that encourage other people to use AI to generate off other artist’s works without their consent?
People are crying over AI art but they don't realize that "Artistic Licensing" has been a thing for centuries lmfao
yep and this is exactly why I will not support this channel anymore.
@@KonradJablo yeah...licensing has generally been a thing that people PAY for
@@KonradJablo I do know art licensing exists, I do this kind of thing professionally. It’s fine if the artist has licensed their art for Ai programs like this. But the unfortunate fact is a lot of these Ai art programs learn by being given images from artists that haven’t done so, which is the main problem with Ai art. If the artists have sold their art or otherwise given permission via contract for Ai gen purposes, then there’s no problem with using Ai
here we go again with the crybaby artists.
1:28 writing a prompt makes you an artist? That job used to be called an editor.
that whole thing is just a way of making the prompter feel good :D
its like someone using google is a liberian or an author or something xD
Yes
@@sabbiano1257 "/imagine a guy screaming on a bridge, colors swirl, hands to face, scream, scream, expressionism." - boom, I'm an artist. If anyone uses that prompt they owe me royalties. 🙄
@@aludrenknight1687 Do it, no one is denying you that opportunity to make money.
@@sabbiano1257 I did do it, it's right there! If the prompt makes you the artist then you don't need the ai result. Any ai bot will give a result.
back in the 90's when i started out with Photoshop 4.0 people said i was "cheating" at art!🤣
You are missing the point. Traditional art and digital both involve the same manual process. I still need to sketch, compose, choose my color swatch have skills to do what I do. Even photography involves composition. "Prompt engineers" can just be any rando that copies some text from chat gpt and pastes it in mj sd dalle
This is old but I didn't know about the clip interrogator. Thanks a subscribe well deserved!
Hi Unmesh, thx for the great video, keep up the good work brother!
Science is becoming a curse..countdown begins..Congrats piximperfect
Always enjoy your videos. To the point and informative, but joyful at the same time.
People who make money by selling art are not artists.. people who create art are artists.
Even Piximperfect is doing AI tutorials... what a world...
we all can see worse future for our Fav Artists.. then Ai in people's normal jobs too
AI will take over everything like Skynet
Why not? Be grateful and open your mind to the future.
@@charlesscott4929 im all about it... My YT channel has been dedicated to teaching AI for creative purposes for months now... Everyone is evolving... I work in animation and film professionally and AI has been a major topic for the whole community... I love Unmesh and have been a long time fan... My point was these massive channels are even getting into discussing AI since they also know it 100% is the future and is turning the creative world upside down... It is quite fascinating...
@@BalkanWizard for most... I embrace it and I teach it in my spare time so I am ready for it...
The more I see what AI can do, the more I'm happy I didn't choose art as a career but as a hobby.
Lol I left my restaurant job to see if I could do art full time, but the way Ai is advancing it’s hard to see a future in that 😂 I’m making sure I know how to use all the Ai though
True. Yesterday I was shocked how fast I got amazing oil painting results :))
Its ok for printing.. but replicate in real is much harder..
@@AnthonyGoodley how are you verified with just a k subs?
@@pastuh 3D printing is also improving. Is it that hard to imagine 3D printing oil paint onto a canvas? Or, eventually, printing the canvas too...
@@friendlyvimana check your eyes
Excellent exploration. Well done.🌟👏👍
Wow, this is really interesting! I can't believe how well the AI was able to generate text prompts based on the images. It's amazing to see how far AI has come and the creative possibilities it opens up. I can't wait to see what other innovative uses of AI will be developed in the future!
Quick note, if the image is a png, chances are the prompt and config are embedded. Might be worth checking that out first. Thanks for another great video!
Is there a better file type to use?
For all of the people saying that we're "stealing" other artist's work... I happen to be an artist with over 30 years experience and did a test.
I loaded 6 different -- yet obviously themed -- album covers that I created for a band (no I will not say which one for privacy reasons) into img2prompt.
img2prompt kicked out some very good descriptions BUT attributed my work to 6 different artists that I have never heard of, seen their work, and I most definitely did not "copy their style" or anyone else's. I've worked well over 20 years via my network connections only i.e. no social media, marketing, or adverts. Those that contact me know why and for what reason. However, as some other artists have pointed out, the people that are the most active on the internet (or famous masters) are the ones getting attributed with the AI algorithms. Not the true "originators" of a style... the OG copyright holders if you will... that popularised a "look or style".
I personally have no problem with that, and I'm starting to use AI in my own work as an idea generator, and thank Unmesh and other channels for making the experimentation easier. Will I be replaced eventually? Absolutely! And counting on it. But I'll also be moving forward into the future with other creative endeavours.
My motto my entire career: Never stand still, or you'll get run over.
Same here. Almost 20 years in the entertainment industry as an artist and now using Stable Diffusion to speed up my "side hustle creator-owner" IP. I've tried this img2prompt with my own art and it was funny. My style is way different from Ilya Kuvshinov, but this img2prompt attributed my work to him haha
Keep that in mind once AI can do the same thing you can do, and you are left jobless :)
@@luka9911 Implying that is automatically the case - or will be the case in OP's lifetime.
@@Amelia_PC If these companies can take the IP of artists and use it to train the AI for personal gain. Then they can also take your IP. Allowing companies to do this undermines regular people's rights.
@@Thesamurai1999 Yup, you're right. That's the reason you have to copyright your entire IP when you create one. I own my IP rights way before AI, with text and images registered. If someone copies the style, story, or characters I developed for my IP, I'll sue them. Same for everyone who has an IP.
When I generate any image using AI, I use deceased artists in my prompts (like pre raphaelite painters). But I prefer to train AI with my own art style since I have easily over 5,000 drawings because I'm a comic book artist. Each panel counts.
If you're an artist, I suggest you add something to the image description that indicates you don't want to enter on AI training database. The law is changing and they're planning to add it. If an artist doesn't want to participate, he or she can't have their art used to train an AI. And that's great :)
And now, this is the official announcement that you already have ended your artist career and you seems happy about it.
I've been looking for something similar, like forever. Thank you!
Such job was all my life
So here we sit, gleefully watching in wide-eyed wonderment as technology makes more and more humans obsolete. We can't help ourselves, because we LOVE science fiction, and it's all becoming a reality right before our very eyes.
Your children will tell stories to their disbelieving grandchildren about how they used to write music, paint, and build things before the Silicon Oligarchy made ordinary humans obsolete.
Imagine how impossible mobile touch screens and internet was and now are everyday tools. You forget that humans learn and improve too with all tools available for everyone. People are more creative than ever with tech.
@@hombacom AI isn't a tool. AI is a replacement.
@@AM-kb9cz Maybe you feel replaceable but don’t spread fear. It’s just software anyone can try to learn and understand it’s limits.
@@hombacom It's not fear, it's a reality. A tool is something a human uses to do work with their skills and according to their will.
A screwdriver is a tool. You can use it to screw things. If you ask your employee to screw something, are you doing the job through him? Is he a tool? No, he's doing the work, he's a worker.
Now let's say you fire your employee and buy a robot, and you ask the robot to screw something. If you just tell it what to do and you see it doing it completely external to you, are you screwing things using it? Or is it screwing everything while you watch? Yeah the robot in that case isn't a tool, it's a replacement for a human worker.
It's the same with AI art, you see. Someone with no artistic training but lots of money needs one or several images done, so he hires an artist or group of artists to do the job.
But why do that when they could just ask an AI to do it? He's got no artistic training, he won't be able to tell if something is really good, or just flashy. He may think he knows, but he doesn't.
You may say "well then he hires an artist to supervise everything!" Yeah that's called art supervisor and it's one job of many. Still kicking a lot of people out.
And I hope no one suggests all artists become art supervisors because that would show a lack of knowledge about hierarchies at the industry Yeah why isn't everyone at mcdonalds a manager? Why isn't everyone at the office the boss? That's laughable.
"Then they should just give up art and learn other skills" yeah still a bunch of people are now looking for jobs and the number of jobs offered isn't growing. Wait until new different AIs take other people's jobs and see unemployment rates rise. Super fun for the economy eh? Who's going to pay to see the new 99% AI generated pixar movie?
AI is a replacement, not a tool. Saying otherwise is deceitful.
Cheers.
@@AM-kb9cz AI is a lot of different things so I dont see the point of simplify like that. For someone Photoshop is a tool. If you just “ask the AI” you get often odd or boring average of everything it learned, but you can spend a lot of time to tweak it if you want. But it feels like random one hit wonders and hard to make images that belong to each other. Is it ethically right to train on public images, maybe not. I don’t like AI hype or to make fun of artists. Some jobs are in danger but I don’t see that humans become obsolete.
it keeps getting better
Sad thing is today deviant art is FULL of AI whether the users admit it or not, its quite obvious. Earlier this year b4 i found out about it(sad i know) i was amazed at all this work people were doing. then i noticed this lil description ai generated and was like -- hmm wait u mean this is all ai created- what is that exactly? and i dove deep. At the surface level its just fun at how easy it is, 2nd level i realize all those phone apps are basically this( i don't own a smartphone- so im kinda behind) :D, 3rd level is actually trying to make your images unique with specific phrases/ words and getting rid of obvious hints that its ai and not a photograph (photography is what i like), i'm still diving deeper trying to find the bottom
You can also use Chatgpt to get prompt.
Whoa. Makes sense. That thought never occurred to me. Thanks.
It's like a snake eating its own tail
This depresses me.
Give it a few years and it will create whole movies for you just by typing some general frame work. Spooky.
and that is just the tech that has been released to public.
They already did it with rings of power
@@staceykimbell9324 lawl
No no give it a more years and it can do everything you can think of!
I love yours tutsss 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Very interesting :) in reversing the process. l believe if you used the V3 or V4 (--v 4) in midjourney the result may looks way better also specifying the quality while writing the prompt will defiantly affecting the result.
Do you have any "Keep Prompting" merch?
Do Any of these Apps also give you the Camara lens used in a particular Image that is uploaded ??
Anna Dittmann probably think it's stolen.. but you don't care. That's the magic of the AI, my friend.
I don't seem to be able to think of a use function for these AI things? I suppose we can sell the results without investing time?
There are two types of ai artists the ones who make their prompts from scratch and those who just copy prompts. You can tell which one is hated by the ai art community lol
Dude. You're gonna be rich soon with that voice and teaching style. Seriously you just blew me away with that.
Are these images and image variations being pulled somewhere from the web or they completely unique and original?
Thanks so much for this video. I have struggled with how to describe my art for a long time. I have even hired people from time to time to write descriptions for me. I will give these tools a go and see how they do.
AI bros thought typing words into a prompt was too difficult so they needed an AI to do that as well
There needs to be regulations which will protect human artists' rights, which will prevent use of Copyrighted artworks in datasets and artists names in prompts unless they consent to it. Otherwise, yes it is stealing when you build the whole program using Artists' intellectual properties without their consent and plus making huge amount of money without compensating them. It is art theft, exploitation and simply unethical. It is clearly stealing when you can use artist names in prompts and sometimes generated result is basically a copy of original work or slightly modified and merged with other human artists' works. Maybe There needs to be another AI or program developed for detecting copyrighted components in generated AI art. If the content is too similar to existing copyright material or if the AI can detect what kind of training material was fed into it, it throws out a claim at the company or prompt user. Like the UA-cam which has algorithms that automatically review videos and blast copyright claims for audio use.
When there will be regulation that human artist can't learn how to draw looking at other people's works? Because this is literally how Stable Diffusion models are. They aren't copying. They are learning the general concept.
Thanks for the video,
How can you create AI-based images without distorted faces?
The key is to use negative prompt in Stable Diffusion. Midjourney model is doing it behind the scenes probably, because it's way easier to use and get great results.
Where is the human 's place, years of learning process and be stolen by some machine, typing something on the box doesn't make them become an artist honestly
doesn't really make them artists, but it does make them express themselves and get what's on their minds out in an observable way without them having to spend years learning all the techniques, I'm an artist and I support that so not everyone has to have the effort I had to get great results and expressed themselves
This was insightful being that I play around with other AI image generators... and they are definitely more miss than hit and I keep wondering if it's my prompts haha This was good. Keep rocking!
Such a saddening state to see what art have become
Great now I gotta go off on more people copying my prompts lol bad enough I had to quit graphic design 🙃
@@MKultra81 like human photo manipulation ? Lol
Why would you have to quit graphic design?
Love you bro ❤️🔥❤️🔥
You are sooo late here - try the V4 of the MidJourney, and You'll be amazed! (What You are using here is at best V3, not even a beta!)
Is there a way to merge a real life image and a illustration by dropping two images together?
Really informative video! TFS
colab not working
How little empathy there is for real artists who create original pieces and make a living from their work.
You're not wrong...
@@Lioness_of_Gaia The decision to use or not an AI application is up to each person but here there are several factors that cannot be denied, a legislation on the unauthorized use of pieces of art that obviously affect the artists who created them, and the background of the creation of the different AI engines as a race of which one gets the best software regardless of the consequences that affect the artists. Morality is left aside when there is a market, it is the truth, the real artist is in the second place.
@@El_The_Best Yeah, it's a mess. It's hard enough as an artist.
@@El_The_Best You've got some awesome Playlists!
But artists are already using this to speed their own workflow, without stealing from anyone.
Great channel, thanks!
Thank you for showing us this.
Thank you for devaluation art and people who do art for work! I bet you can draw a single line never the less drawing a realistic looking face!
He is 'devaluing' even his own work that he does with photoshop and I don't see him crying like most people here.
Go to therapy and tell your psychologist how an AI took your job because you couldn't adapt to technology.
@@sabbiano1257 adapt to this .I.
@@juostudios6216 that hurt me so much👌
@@sabbiano1257 That's because you're selfish and exaggerated at the same time. You don't need therapy, just be aware. This devalues a sea of visual artists who spent years and years learning techniques and put their history into the art they produce. Now any busy teenager, just wanting to like on Instragam, shares 30 "arts" in a month, selling cheap, without giving any value, because he didn't make the effort for that.
So it's easy, these people use a program that just needs you to be literate.
@@marcosfront1 Then don't use the AI, my friend.
You just answered yourself.
Do you do your art for money and likes on instagram only?
If so you are going to be a frustrated envious with life and others just because someone or something is better than you.
I have been forging my way for 20 years in a job that has been industrialized for decades and I never stopped working because of the progress of technology, I have adapted and those technological tools I use them in my work to improve every day.
Now go cry somewhere else please, because I do not understand what you do watching a video of something that causes you so much frustration and envy because you do not have the talent to compete or excel over this AI.
love you always bro,,,,,thank for make my day
Can you make an AI to copy the photo and put in into the prompt generator? Is so hard, need more AI.
If ai is hard, try drawing. Maybe that will be easier for you x)
amazing, thank you 🙏🏻
I loved your video. Thanks a lot
Please can you also review Canva's text to image AI drawing tool?🙏
interrogator does not work
As an artist myself I'm really disappointed in people who use AI art and steal our work..
As an artist, you have been stealing everyone's work you have ever seen. There Is No Difference. The fact that AI does it better and faster doesn't change this.
@@LeoGarciaPhotos What a load of garbage.
@@LeoGarciaPhotos There is a difference from learning colouring techniques and adapting them with your own, or having pose references, etc. than literally ripping out parts and complete art styles from a certain artist (as you can see, you just put the name of an artist as a promt and that's it). If you'd use AI for a reference for a project to get something REAL done by commissioning a real artist that might be okay to a certain extent.. BUT selling AI art? Using it for commercial benefits? Absolutely not.
And speaking of making it better.. The amount of scuffed AI art i saw is ridiculous.
@@Sixfifteen81 I have been in many art classes and everyone has used someone else's art as examples in style and technique... Sooooo not garbage.
@@LeoGarciaPhotos If you can't tell the difference between that and this, there's something wrong with you.
Mannn, why are doing this, we know these things. I have subscribed your channel to improve skills and not for AI advertising
because money money money 🦀
@@samankucher5117 No... it's to keep up and not be left behind.
@@LeoGarciaPhotos
left behind on what ?
@@shredd5705
lets gooooo destroy art and lives 😤 let's gooooooòooo
I need to do this in batch. Can i?
Hi could u please tell usabout Unreal Engine. In some video
Humans no longer needed. Its time.
He says on a video about a piece that would have had no aesthetic value whatsoever without a human artist to derive their prompt from
"steal Ai art" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 the copyright of the arts used to train the AI is guaranteed, using AI art as your own is plagiarism, OpenAi has set up a chat, if you ask the following question "Art made by AI that has been trained with copyrighted art is plagiarism?" the answer is the same
> *the copyright of the arts used to train the AI is guaranteed, using AI art as your own is plagiarism*
What do you mean?
i disagree, Working with AI is like hiring a concept artist on your project. There fore it is using your resources to help you. There for it's a collab. Also if you actually take that base work and add to it, then it's transformative, then it's really your work at that point.
@@DanknDerpyGamer if the AI was trained with its own database or using images from artists with permission, the copyright of the generated images belongs to the developers and their stakeholders. but if they have not had such permission and have not used their own database, is considered plagiarism regardless of how Ai works and anyone trying to claim copyright on these images is subject to legal consequences
@@chadcrypto2675 resources that are copyrighted that the AI is being fed without regulations. Yeah sure bud that's sound real legal
@@SENYSENofficial I don't think you understand how AI generated images work.
The majority of these AI images were generated using the open-source Stable Diffusion model. The datasets used in this process, LAION-5B and LAION-Aesthetics, consist of publicly available URLs paired with tags that are also open for access.
Plus, it is currently permitted in most countries as long as the final product is significantly transformed from the original images. This is demonstrated by the inability to accurately recreate famous works of art, such as the Mona Lisa, using these models. It should be noted that the minimal SD model file is only 2GB, meaning that it is not possible to maintain reasonable quality while condensing 5 billion images into this small size.
These models utilize a set of differential equations to map language tokens to local features, which represents the minimal amount of information necessary to reproduce the core characteristics of an image or piece of language.
The use of AI to generate images does not constitute plagiarism due to the creation of new and transformed images through the utilization of algorithms and input data. While these images may be influenced by or incorporate aspects of preexisting images, they are not direct reproductions and therefore do not infringe upon copyright laws.
A.I. another medium to explore. Have fun.
what do you mean "this artist"????????????????
Wow! Nice contents channel. I am a new subscriber. Thanks for sharing video. I have learn from yo channel
When I use the reference link, midjourney basically ignores it. Even with the IW prompt... Is there something I'm doing wrong
Make sure there is a space after the .png
@@LeoGarciaPhotos thank you I'll try that!
Very nice thank you! When using the resulting image, are there copyright concerns?
How would there be? The resulting image is original. You’re not republishing the prompt. You’re generating an image based on the prompt.
If you’re nervous, just change a word or an attribute.
Someday, AI could demand equal rights :-)
Ai scraped copyrighted works, medical files and private photos , so even if you don't get a copy of an existing work there are still a lot of legal issues to worry about
Is there any AI platform out there that you can FEED it an image, and it will tell you the best FONTS to use with that image and the best colors for those fonts? So basically an AI typography?
Saying what's visible on the painting is not an explanation. Most importantly the creator must be able to tell his share of life story why the creator did that work exactly. Any creator who can do that can basically do any task based on logic and reason. I think artists can easily sue these stuff and the people behind it for looking very similar to and inspired by their artwork and pretty much imitating their art styles and horribly mimicking their elements for commercial purposes.
Except, how are you going to sue the originators of the style that the current artist being sued is using? No artist creates in a vacuum. They all "steal" (learn) from somewhere and/or someone before them.
> *artists can easily sue these stuff*
"Easily?" The legal surrounding it isn't anywhere near sorted out yet, so how is that possible?
@@TheDocPixel You call learning is stealing? Or copy paste artist data is stealing?
@@jeromefernando6232 Learning from data is definitely not stealing. Neither is learning from an artist's style because a specific style or look is not copyrightable.
I also think so! Real artists build their own style basing on experience in life. To put words in a machine and steal the style of one real human beings is a crime. Yes, we learn from our brothers and sisters, but we don't take their identity and say we are like her or him.
So human worth is kicked by simpletons who have no idea of the true meaning of art. (We don't take doping to win the race). Why should an artist need such automatic toys. The mentality of real creatives is full of ideas, and they learn skills to express them because they are inspired of the thought, that they can communicate with their OWN work: personality, ideas, mood, feelings, statements, entertainment, etc. Know an AI what mood, soul, passion really means?
How do you use image weight with midjourney 4.0? I get an error stating invalid parameter when trying :/
Any advice is greatly appreciated!
image weight is not available at the moment with V4, the default value is 0.5 right now i think, u can always try in older version and then remaster it with V4,
Good luck
Thanks For Informative Video, But Is There Any Trick To Convert Our Basic Text Commant Into Perfect Prompt ? Plz Make Video On It...Great Job 👌
seems every prompt tip video wants to keep people away from using their creativity and just to find the easiest way to get someone else look
Dall E on another level...liked it
I can't help but think no one will be able to draw or paint in 20 years. It's all going to be ai. We can already use it to generate videos, text and images. Who is going to want to invest years in practice and study. Who's going to bother developing a style?
You're right!
To use AI is NOT that kind of art, REAL artists would do. Real creatives don't need this because they (we) have their (our) own skills (no matter what level) and own creativity.
AI users are NO artists and never will because they don't learn it.
Their art and other creations does not arise in their minds, as they believe and claim, but simply uses an automaton that does the thinking for them, and soon the feeling too.
Would you teach your child to use such tools?
Maybe there will soon be AI designer drugs or an AI reality where simpletons will convince themselves that they can now create reality.
Yes, they even steal the art style from REAL artists. That's ridiculous, soulless and already in the direction to steal the identity of humans. That is a crime.
If there is an end time is that now and AI is a lousy part and reason because it's creating insanity and delusions of grandeur. It's lazy, decadent, and proves to be part of a time when people stop being people. They will be cruising around in AI wheelchairs since walking is just too demanding for them, although they have healthy legs (I don't mean people with health problems, they are not guilty of it).
Friendly greetings and a wonderful day!
Me, I'll continue to make art, cause I enjoy makeing art not just the finished piece. And I hope more artists will remember to fall in love with the process along with the product. Also don't forget about the human element of art that load of collectors and commissioners enjoy and are very much a part of the process.
Yes. Exactly this. If this AI thing continues, there may still be a lot of human hobbyist artists, for sure. But will there be people pushing their skills and imagination far enough to push the art scene in any direction? No, if they can't make a living out of it.
And since AI art parasites real people's art to create images, it'll either lose quality or stagnate forever.
@@AM-kb9cz You can't always take the easiest path that is possible.
Is a country richer if it prints tons of banknotes and would make everyone millionaires. This absurd economic idea would come to an end quickly, since the money would of course be worthless.
But AI users live this lazy and doomed attitude.
Soon they will hate each other because everyone wants to be the best, which will no longer be easy among millions of equally lazy toy artists.
The ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, which features Michelangelo with a remarkable painting depicting a few hundred passages from the Bible, is also a wonderful masterpiece,
as he lay on his back, struggling with the quality of the colors of the time, some of which dripped onto his face. This attitude is unmatched, but a sign of a personality willing to give something for probably no great payment.
Of course, most of us artists are not geniuses like Michelangelo. That's not what I was talking about.
It is his passion to show us the value of true art, rather than people pulling a few paintings out of a machine.
It's a question of respect, and many other reasons, why AI art will soon be worthless.
@@vinricvannorth5495 I agree that if the economic system is changed and all of our needs are covered then yeah, people who are passionate about art will be able to dedicate his life to hone their skills and at least among them there would be an increased interest in human made art.
If the economy continues as is, people will need money to eat and survive, so if they aren't able to do it because people are more willing to use AI rather than hire a human being to do art, artists will have to find other jobs taking away time from their passion. The sistine chapel is a masterpiece of course, but it was commissioned. It was not done for free iirc.
That picture looks like a CorelDraw image. Over the years they have had many pictures of a woman with flowers to advertise their product.
You should use -- v4 for Midjourney
Saying that using other people's prompts is stealing is so pretentious considering that the AI just steals people's artstyles without consent. (I know it doesn't steal art, just the "styles", just legal theft basically).
Except you've never been able to claim ownership over a style like you could a piece of physical property, or a copyright even IIRC
@@gondoravalon7540 You can't claim ownership of a prompt either. It's just a list of instructions, like a recipe, and you cannot copyright a recipe.
Airony 😂
To quote from my favorite 1994 movie, "The Little Rascals" with regards to creating appropriate txt2art prompts, one needs a "rather extensive vocabulary, a phenomenal grasp of grammar and superlative command of syntax". Or just let 'clip interrogator' do it for you! Thanks for sharing this approach!
Mai Ligne - Back in the Days
Bhai I'm from India one video on Hindi on how to start AI Art brother love from India ❤️💯
Clip Interrogator/hugging face is better but when it doesn't take forever, it's crashing with error messages
AI still has trouble with the number of horses' legs, human arms, and legs. Objects are still hit-and-miss. A learning process that is getting better by the day. By next year, human artists will be lost careers.
I don't see people losing their jobs just yet. There's a lot of legal problems with using AI for profit > a lot of prompts involve 'Disney' and 'Artstation'. I don't see Disney being very happy with just anyone being able to use their name to turn a profit. The bigger question is how will those corporations use these programs. Google and others, 100% saw this coming so how are they currently using it? I mean a computer can play chess better than any human ever born and to be born so why is chess still a sport? Ai may learn quick but humans tend to be slow and sentimental so will be interesting to see how and when it's used.
@@Sabrina-wh1jh Chess is still a sport because people compete with other people.
@@Sabrina-wh1jh Has anyone been sued over this yet? The only way you can sue for copyright infringement is if the work is registered with the copyright office. That isn't happening because the copyright office will not register works by AI or non-humans.
@@Sabrina-wh1jh chess..is a sport? 😂
@@marcosfront1
i think that is a bad example artists live on how much products they can sell. sure they can still do ot as a hobby but hobby artists can never be as good as a artist that spends most of day drawing for a job because a hobby artists need to work another job to make a living and pay bills.
i think they say you need to draw 5 hours a day to become good at drawing in 3 years or something . and that's only drawing painting will take more time no one with a job has 5 hours free in their day .
You should of tell it that its illustration not a painting ( cause there are visible outlines), also non realistic style in negative prompting, id try pixar and vallejo comics illustration
As you can tell, thanks!
Can you really call somebody an artist that just types text promts to create an artwork. Srsly that just sounds very unfair.
This is fun and inspiring.
I love playing with these AI tools. Thank you
just remember AI "art" is just stealing data of other artists who worked on them for hours, and it is not the same as artists being inspired
morality is up to you, although law regulations are on thier way
It can't be stopped now
No it's not. StableDiffusion models aren't copying... learn the basics at least...
for the short of images I've been trying to backwards engineer, these were a phenomenal waste of time. Didn't get anywhere close to the results I needed.
Gotta love all the digital “artists” accusing AI models of “stealing” their style … while simultaneously slapping on a layered image of someone else’s Pinterest photo to flip, filter, and set to “overlay” and paint on top of for “inspiration”, “texture”, and “happy accidents”
Have you seen any artist trace?
What?
Thanks 🤗
Any customer could just jump the call to an artist... nice! But... is there any art in the AI?
I think that the possibility to use the style or the name of an ARTIST ALIVE, should be forbid.
I use often, Ai to text image, but after this video I realize how bad is to use the assets of another artist...
For the rest, great video and content as always :)
> I think that the possibility to use the style or the name of an ARTIST ALIVE, should be forbid.
Why? (one doesn't "own" a style in the sense one owns a copyright or a piece of physical property)
Surely most of the images on midjourney have their prompts visible to all.