5/22/1982 ABC News Weekend Report Falkland Islands War Coverage 90% Complete
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 жов 2017
- This is the Saturday night ABC nightly news from 5/22/1982. Most of the coverage was on the Falkland Island conflict. Frank Reynolds is at the news desk for the vacationing Tom Jerrol.
This newscast originally aired on 5/22/1982 on KTVK Channel 3 in Phoenix AZ. KTVK Channel 3 was the ABC affiliate at the time in Phoenix
If you are interested in more commercials or newscast like this search "ewjxn" and what your looking for in the UA-cam search box. We have thousands and thousands of more commercials in our archive. We add 5 to 10 new clips a day from the 1970's to the 1990's so be sure to subscribe for your daily trip back in time.. - Розваги
1: Starts War for no reason
2. Loses war
3. Say it's unfair
Dfggf Fsujfwjsf Hahahahah wrecked
That also sounds like germany an Iraq.
VC YT so true
@@dampmaky , cheers.
War Is Never Fair
35 odd years later and Argentina still goes bankrupt every other year or so
And? Economy is irrelevant to military success. African nations invade each other on a frequent basis, they all have terrible economies.
As a brit I wouldn't yield that to loud. UK is just on the run to crash economy and financial stuff by exiting EU. Just get your own stuff sorted. Always remember, karma is a bitch.
@@MrBubbleJet EU itself is not doing better....neither economically nor socially with people dying all time from islamic terrorism and imported crime
MrBubbleJet yeah, what a load of rubbish
Great commentary. The argies doesn't give a damn to their own people and they care more about some freezing cold islands...
'Colonialism'? Someone needed to remind the Argentinians that they are all mainly of Spanish decent!
Most are of mixed Indian and European ( largely Italian ) descent
Electric Ink h
And the leader of their Junta was full blooded Italian!
What makes me laugh is descendants of weak civilisations bitching about their wholesale destruction by a superior civilisation, whilst they ignore the fact that their own tribes tried to wipe out their enemies but were incapable... Humankind has invaded and captured lands from weaker opponents for millennia, get over it. You were weak and are lucky you weren't wiped out. Be glad that your blood line is still alive...
Actually we have a weird mix down here, I for one have German, Italian, Muslim and native american decandants and my family dates back to the nations colonial eras, I have very small signs of spanish infact we also have irish, terks and scots as well
How could anyone blame the brits for this? They retaliated as they should ! Good job GB
Typical cold war rivalry
@@willywampus3426 It's internationally known as the Cold War, but it wasn't very cold now, was it? The "Cold" War was a collection of bloody and vicious wars, Vietnam and the Korean War being a prime example, the Falklands, I'm not so sure about, lives were lost, sure, but not to the extent of the previous two.
@@ahumanwhomshallnotbenamed9404 bruh I thought what he meant was the Soviet union blame on GB, I know what a cold war is and its proxy wars I'm not a child you know
@@willywampus3426 I know you do? Why are you getting all defensive, I'm just saying why it known as a cold war when there was nothing cold about it.
Europeans and Britains puppet, US, will defend the british point of view of course, they are the bullies, they got the big guns. But here in Latin America we all know the islands do belong rightfully to Argentina, although the invaders will never give them back cause as I said, they have the bigger guns.
How dare anyone accuse the British for the loses over the Falklands. The Falklands was under British rule and Argentina invaded. No way was we going to sit back and let those dogs attack and get away with it. Thankfully, that dog was swiftly put down..
Those so-called dogs sunk 6 of your ships and killed 255 of your sailors.
Wuff Wuff!!
@@ajdar5582 plus when you compare deaths and the aircraft shot down on Argentina side there's quite a large difference
Why are you even replying to him? It's not worth it man, he's an idiot. At the end of the day, they lost. That's that. Let him whine if he wants, it wont change history.
@@ajdar5582 you still salty decades after lol
A D stop being angry because you got kicked by the British and by the way you live in a shitty 3rd world hell hole jajajajaja
The longest supply line in history. The British literally went to the other side of the planet and still won outnumbered
We’d happily go wherever the fight was, distance is irrelevant 🇬🇧
I'm British and obviously support that the Falklands are our territory. But I have to say how wonderfully balanced this news segment was to watch. It's so difficult to find news like this.
Xenophobe
Back when American news was about information, not infotainment.
G.M. C Cope
Certainly not from the BBC. This day in 1982, the Beeb actually announced a planned attack by the Paras on the BBC evening news, to the rage of the UK force commanders. The Argies didn't believe the BBC could ever do such a thing, thought it was a bluff and so ignored it!
Yeah, they gave up doing news like this by the 90's. Now it's all about the narrative.
I understand why the Reagan Administration wanted to trek a middle ground between two crucial allies who were suddenly at war, but I can assure any British here in the comment section that US public opinion was firmly on the side of the UK. Argentina, despite being recognized as a bulwark against Soviet influence in South America, was simply too exotic; too dictatorial to compete with the affection most American did, and still do feel toward the British democracy.
I' am an American and U.S Navy veteran, and I text that Malvinas belongs to Argentina. A violation of the Monroe Doctrine. United States is owned by the Rothschilds banking familiy, and the Bank of England. American people are under mind control by the Zionist propaganda war machine, and is in a state of slavery since 1913 by the Zionist international bankers.
pretty well said. respect from Australia!
Stgfre I’m such a slave I can be gay straight or identified as whatever I can go to school fuck, relax, build, talk shit too fucks like you can take a trip around the world and so fourth but yet I’m a slave good logic there bud
Stgfre oh yeah I just screamed fuck Sunni and Shi’a let’s blow up the world and fuck the world leaders but guess what I am still at my place enjoying my life it sounds like you have a personal issue
S that need to be solved unless you are getting paid by Iran
Again you can text these statements, but you at the mercy at those in power. You can enjoy your place and life until they tell decide you will not have your place. You will know when you have to lose your sovereignty as a citizen to dark occultists.
The British were never going to lose.
we nearly did....luck played a big factor with Bombs not detonating and missiles locking onto container ship as opposed to a carrier. Luck is always a big factor in war, just look at WW2
@Scot-Irish UK It would be worse for Argentina now, than in 82. We have capabilities now that we didn't have back then. We could destroy Argentina's land forces on the islands using just our submarines with their cruise missiles. Never mind the fact we'd see an invasion coming long before it got there now. Argentina wouldn't be able to hide the troop movements needed to mass a force for another invasion.
Also, Argentina's military capability has significantly diminished since 1982. While our forces are smaller than they were, technologically they are vastly superior than what we had in 82. Argentina doesn't even have the amphibious abilities now to invade. They just couldn't do it.
If Britain lost a carrier they had an offer of a loan of one from the US. Thatcher would never have abandoned the Falkland Islanders, particularly after UK forces had been killed liberating them.
@@audience2 If the UK had lost a carrier and the US had loaned a helicopter carrier I reckon it would have taken months to equip it, familarise the crew and get it to the Falklands. The Argentinians would have had plenty of time to better prepare it's defense. I'm really not sure how that would have gone.
We will never surrender those islands after that war, I think Argentina now know they can never compete with Britain in a war even if it’s right next to them and 8000 miles from us.
Dave Walker
1806 - 1807 - 1845.
Oh yeah with muskets and wooden ships like come on really theres jets, aircraft carriers, missles, artillery, tanks, apcs etc UK wins hands down
Have to say, those sidewinders were a big asset and France stopping the delivery of more exocets helped too
Anglus Britain stopped France more like. Mi5 had an open cheque book to buy up all the missiles on the black market as well.
Facu Agui those helped you get the Falklands back?
Nahhh mate
Bloody brilliant old footage.Thank you ever so much for the upload old chap.
You are welcome thx
THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK
the pirates strike back
@Bob Saunders yes that has been youe countries history
@Bob Saunders land thatwas in spains control
@@FRONT-rc1qg Argentina is stolen land. ..FACT
@@loyalist5736 your high
Although the USA government attitude was middle ground the people here was on the side of the uk
richard smith Behind the scenes America backed the UK. They gave us sidewinder missiles which changed the war.
@@rewind12354 And gave Argentina A4 skyhawks ...................... money first morality second
@J D Nothing to do with supporting one imperialist country over another imperialist country you dumbass, it's supporting profit over peace. How do you struggle the basics?
America said they would loan their aircraft carriers
THE us DIDNT KNOW WHAT THEY SHOULD DO, PROTECT ITS OLDEST FRIEND WITH SAME LAW AND CULTURE OR DEFEND Argentina
Wow, interesting video. Such a stupid war, as an Argentinian I'll never understand the point of claiming these islands, the only thing I know is that we were ruled by a bunch of idiotic dictators back then.
The "point" was to deflect public attention and opinion in Argentina away from the failures of the Military Junta and it's increasingly oppressive rule and to try an unite the country by means of a quick, cheap and easy military victory. Unfortunately they chose the wrong place and country to try it against. Still, at least at the end of it the Junta was overthrown and civilian rule and democracy was re-established in Argentina, you have the UK to thank for that if nothing else. A great pity that even to his day Argentina has yet to fully develop as a stable democracy though.
view this Facundo Christmas Truce of World War I -- Joyeux Noel [2005 film]
Dictators trying to cling onto power,if they managed it Argentina would still be a dictatorship. But let's be fair Britain is a country that's not an easy target,they'll be good friends but can be extremely bad enemies if provoked. Happy to coexist together though. The Falklands only have a few houses, sheep and penguins but it was an enemy island they made home and will always fight to defend their people.
y hacer videos haciendote el justin bieber, no se sorprende que seas tan boludo
for the oil that's why they invaded.
Latin American countries: "The British are pirates and colonialists". Yeah, your whole existence is thanks to Spanish colonialism and gold-thieving. Hypocrisy-much. You lost the colonialism game in this case. Get over it.
Leode Siefast Only Chile likes us and actively helped us in the war.
@@alexanderthegreat445 you forgot about Guyana, Suriname and French guinea.
justifying the birth of nations by saying that their cause is through colonialism, is a rather absurd argument
We have always like the UK and we did helped them (you) during the war...Their dictator at the time, Galtieri said in plaza the Mayo that our island were next in their list.. the enemy of our enemy is our friend..
Greetings 🇨🇱
Argentina was a colony and it's habitants (our national leaders) expelled the spanish rulers in 1810, which was an empire. Does not have anything to do with Spain nowadays; Argentina is a mixture of many races. But form the very first moment of its history, it existed due to the decssion to fight colonialism, in fact it's your country who is a colonialist power. Great Britain is in fact at 8.000 miles of Malvinas, there's not any logical explanation of how England can be occupying a territory at that distance, if not by having been around the world seizing territories and in sme cases by force. Argentina instead expelled the british from Buenos Aires three times in 1806, 1807 (that is ten years before the independence), and 1845. That and during the struggle to freed Argentina from spanish rule, also our national leader San Martin freed Chile in 1818 anD Peru in 1820, before giving its forces to Venezuelan Simon Bolivar who freed Ecuador, Venezuela itself and Colombia. But surely you don't know the spanish were in all south america; we all have the same origin but we do not own anything to anybody, we freed ourselves. From the very first breath as independent country, Argentina fought colonialism. England can't say the same, since it occupied terrtories in 90 countries worldwide, plus changed their languages and flags. Their gov. speak about self determination. What do their history say about self determination? (...)
Wait dose that mean we beat the Germans 3 times?
4 if you count the world cup in 66
121Swaleskid Don't include football, they have us beat on that and it's giving them ammunition
@@121Swaleskid you won war on american sick 😂😂😂
@@shahanarif4295 Nazi germans would not waste any time with your people. They had their methods. Understand ?
Nah, it just shows how paranoid you are of us... next thing you'll know isis will have been started by a hidden nazi camp in syria...
As a German I had to laugh when I saw the ex-Nazis who escaped to Argentina during WW2.
"ex-Nazis" What makes you think they were "ex" Nazis?
sirderam1 recorded history....
@@sirderam1 the fact that the nazi party dissolved, meaning they are ex nazi
@@sirderam1 many fled to south America to escape trial.
Thanks for confirming they were escaped Nazis.
Argentina the only country to complain about colonialism when their country is built on it
Keep your damn hands off our penguins .
And our sheep.
More like sheep on the Falklands.
Penguins are an essential ingredient in making Guinness.
@@Dave68Goliath ziggy, beautiful British name ❤️
1982: Americans mock the prospect of British Harriers taking on American jets.
1983: America orders British Harriers.
Carolina lawn darts
@@spanky9676 Someones salty😂
My respects to the British soldiers who fought and died in this senseless war. The fault was the military that were in the Argentine government at that time and unfortunately caused in many people a patriotic awakening believing that a war was a just cause.
Greetings from Argentina. Daniel, 45 years.
Daniel Twingo
Respect mate, sorry the war happened, wasn’t our fault or your fault, idiot dictators ruin everything.
I heard it was all planned by thatcher
*British soldiers. There are four nations in the UK, not just England.
@@blancacardozo581 al menos es razonable
Hope your leaders work towards getting your country on a good economic and democratic footing. Those fools leading you then were murderers of civilians in Argentina. So sad.
I was 15 when this happened. This was my war. I kept all the newspapers throughout the campaign. Our boys did us proud.
Hell yea!
Argentina was proud of their boys too
@Matthew Smith yes, they are absolutely proud of them and no, they did not fight for a military dictatorship. They fought for the country. Which is why the people turned on the junta after the war, but never on the soldiers.
@Matthew Smith once again, what war is not followed by orders you idiot. The country was behind them. This was not the military dictatorship fighting Britain. It was the country behind them, so yes, they are proud and don’t use that Nazi bullshit comparison I find it offensive. The people turned on the dictator ship because they failed them. And they fought a just war since Britain is an imperialist incestuous failing empire that shouldn’t be on this side of the world. Unfortunately, the United States decided to support Britain because there was more benefit at the time in regards to the cold war in the Soviet Union to support them.
@@tmanthemost1157 Proud they surrendered !!!
“Hanging on for dear life” that didn’t age well for Argentina now did it. A comprehensive and utterly devastating and embarrassing defeat for Argentina, so much so they hid it from their own people.
Thanks for uploading this. Even though I was just 10 at the time, I remember these newscasts quite vividly as a kid in Canada. In those days before cable news and the internet, we would rush to the news stand every morning to get the paper and tune the shortwave radio to the BBC World Service to get the latest news on the conflict. It was a war that should never have happened but we were glad Britain regained the islands and an aggressive dictator chastened. BTW, this is the way the news should be delivered folks. Professional, calm, impartial, factual. Quite a contrast to the nonsense that passes off as news today.
Amazing to think the SAS had actually been in Argentina for weeks by the time of this report.
They should have popped the military junta off just as icing on the cake and a welcome present to the innocent Argentinians
No. They made one attempt to go in and they got painted by radar, then the pilots and the troops had a disagreement to where they actually where. Then they flew on towards the Chilean border stopping to drop the sas off close enough to walk into Chile while the pilots flew the chopper into Chile and tried to sink the chopper in a lake in puntas arenas on the Chilean side of the border. The sas got to the Brit embassy and flew home on commercial airlines. while the pilots handed themselves in because the failure of the chopper to sink obviously compromised them and they realised handing themselves in bought the sas lads some time. They got paraded in front of the press and claimed they'd got lost due to weather conditions. After that the only observation on the mainland was naval and aerial with some keyhole stuff of the Americans. I think you can find the helicopter pilot news conference on here. The patrol commander who was chosen to lead the patrol was the legendary fijian known as nasty Neal. Bit of a livewire even in his later years
@@robdean704 sounds not far from true
You can find it on here along with news footage of the chopper been discovered. Fact is after a certain date they didn't need recon teams on the mainland, the war was been won as it was. Plus certain allies, Chile, America and certain parts of French intelligence gave them all they needed. Plus if they'd had teams on the mainland the planning for the Entebbe style raid to kill pilots and destroy planes would have had excellent intelligence when in reality they had virtually none which is why it was 100% considered a suicide mission.
I have absolutely no idea why this video was the top of my recommended list, but it was an interesting little slice of history.
My mate's dad fought in this war for the British army. He was a paratrooper back then and I still wouldn't wanna face him in a battle almost 40 years on.
Imagine actually sitting down and thinking it would be a good idea to pick a fight with the Royal Navy 😂😂😂
@N330AA That is a unique name.
Royal Navy lost to the argentinians. They needed Gurkha army’s help to get the Falkland.
@@abidababi6544 They lost more material than the Argentina navy but only to the Argentine Air Force force. Still won strategically.
Using 40 year old ex Royal Navy (and US ships)
@@ScottRothsroth0616 It's the reg of an AA 767 that decided to destroy itself
You don’t send conscripts to fight an elite army
The worst decition (sorry for the english) of gariteli is, send conscript an half soldier of comandos 601 (spec ops) and the other half are in the border with Chile
The Argies made the stupid mistake of underestimating Margaret Thatcher.
They left their best units guarding the border with Chile
@@audience2 it's the opposite, Thatcher undrestimated Argentina. She never knew that their navy was going to be threaten by argentine aircraft. In fact, check british website naval history and see by yourself how much ships were hit by argentine aircraft. In just 44 days since 1st May and 14th June. It's the biggest loss of Britain in the Cold War; a fleet supposely meant to fight a power like the USSR, and instead almost was sent back to UK by Argentina. In fact if all the british bombs had exploded, that is what would have happened. Still, in any of the books of history of the Cold War the only british vessels sunk, was not made by USSR or China, but Argentina. A latin country, almost unknown by England in 1982, with no experience in modern warfare, and whose main aircraft (used to attack the fleet) was the A4 Skyhawk, which was a model of the 50's bought second hand from US, and armed with non guided bombs that did not explode. On the contrary, BRITAIN'S BIGGEST SUCCESS was sinking a WW2 Cruiser; from 649 argentine that died in the war, 50% were lost in sinking of General Belgrano, former USS Phoenix and survivor of Pearl Harbor in WW2.
I was 6 when this happened. A few years later my parents ran a pub in Norfolk, England and a Veteran came in and spoke about his memories to me and my dad and giving me a Falklands 1 pound note. I don't remember his name but ever since this battle has stuck with me.
Don't mess with the SAS.
You've gotta love Argentian Propaganda: Colonialism and Imperialism. No! Pick a fight. You had better be prepared to lose.
The historical lesson here is simple. The British are slow to anger. But once they are, they are commited to the end. Any enemy had better be prepared for what follows. Because your foe is formidable. And our History, not jingoism, proves that.
Take a fight to us at your peril.
The SAS operations conducted down there at the time were legendary
Especially when a Wasp landed on a glacier to take them back home
We all know the war was won when Clint Eastwood went down there and kicked some Argentinian ass! Sadly, the guy from We Got It Made got killed. RIP Guy From We Got It Made.
i think most of the SAS missions went wrong.
union310 The SBS encroached on an AO allocated to an SAS patrol, it was a failure at the command level
The pebble island raid was textbook SAS. Also bouncing an argentine SF patrol around the mountains all night, leaving only 3 or 4 of them left in the morning.
my goodness how the news content and the news presentation has changed in the last 38 years, fast forward to a mad mad world.
If anybody is listening this is how journalism used to be clear conscise and to the point not the jaundiced preduditial nonsense we have to listen to today!!!
“Rodomontade.” Hilarious from Sir Anthony Parsons.
I’m going to use that word in future.
Made me so happy when they said about the islanders ferrying ammunition, food and tea to the British liberation forces.
My Dad used to play golf with Jeremy Hands, the ITN reporter. The way he told his story of how he actually ended up sailing with the Taskforce was hilarious.
Sadly, he passed away about 20 years ago.
Interesting to see how matter of fact news used to be. Not a bit of it these days.
I know. I really miss it. Now its about the narrative driving clicks to make money. Actually informing the public.. you know, DOING THE JOB, is WAAAAAAYYYYY in the backseat.
@@rcgunner7086 It's depressing. No point watching it now. Unless you enjoy a good rant 😉
@@letsgoBrandon204 And that's what it is: listening to someone present their views and not presenting fact/news and letting you make of it what you will. Commentary has replaced facts. I use to enjoy the networks and CNN. I barely watch them any more.
Frank Reynolds was such a great news presenter
''Argentina says the British are hanging on for dear life..'' lol
Well, its Admiral Snady Woodward who stated in 13 June in his personal diary they were near to be defeated; and by coincidence Argentine's military Gov. General Menendez decided to surrender in 14 June.
General Moore, commander of land forces admited to have survived, by one minute of difference, an air strike by A4 Skyhawks, which in 10th June bombed his own camp liocated in Monte Dos Hermanas.
The Argentine Air Force and Naval Aviation were deadly, sunk many ships and damaged others:
-Destroyer Sheffield Sunk in 4th May
-Destroyer Glasgow baldy damaged in 12th May and withdrawn fo reparations in UK (did not return to the campaing duties)
-Frigates Antelope and Ardent sunk in San Carlos Battle, in 21st and 23rd May respectively.
-Frigate Broadsword hit by cannon fire twice in 12th may and 21st May and had its helicopter destroyed while it was in her deck..
-21ST may Antrim hit by two unexploded bombs and cannon fire, and left for reparations, being inactive fro the rest of the war and waiting in Georgias' waters far from the range of Argentina's Air Force
- In 24th May RFA Sir Galahad was hit by unexploded bomb and abandoned temporarily, RFA Sir Lancelot also hit by bomb and later disabled while it was inside; both RFA Sir Bedivere and Frigate HMS Fearless also hit by cannon fire..
-Destroyer Coventry sunk in 25 th May, also that day logistic Atlantic Conveyor sunk toghether with his charge of 10 helicopters (among other stuff)
- 30th May modified C-130 Hercules damaged a RFA Ship with non guided bomb (slight damage).
Also that day Super Etendar and Skyhawk joint attack to HMS iNVINCIBLE (R-5) which was put out of action
-8th June, at the Fitz Roy raid, destruction of both Sir Galahad (sunk) and Sir Tristam (burnt and abandoned in shore), plus the sinking of Landing Craft ''Foxtrot 4'' from the frigate Fearless
-Destroyer Glamorgan hit by land based Exocet in 12th June, burnt and put out of action, abandoned for repairs.
Plus:
- in 24th April two british helicopters crashed by accident over Georgias during Operation Paraquet.
-Many Harrier jets and Sea Harriers (shot down by argentine artillery at Goose Green and Pt Argentino), at least 7 according to british sources
- At least two attacks from argentine sub. ARA San Luis, whose attacks, although did not sink any ship, made the british fleet to spend 6.000 flying hours by anti submarine aircraft, trying to locate it, but never found it.
- 18TH/19 TH May one helicopter Sea King (number ZA-290 or 294) lost in Punta Arenas, Chile, due to climatic conditions, while trying to reach Patagonian airfields to attack.
-21st May two Gazelles and one Sea King shot down and destroyed by a 40 commandos of the argentine army, out of San Carlos
- 27th May a Pucara shot down, one destroyed on the ground (a Scout and a Lynx)
- Also 27th May both Canberra and Skyhawk attacked the San Carlos defences and caused heavy damage
- The already mentioned attack to british HQ in 10th June
All this happened in just 44 days, from the 1st May in which british Task Force reached South Atlantic and operations started, and Argentina's surrender in 14th June.
The Air Force lost 36 pilots, plus 19 personnel lost in land due to several reasons (british air attacks, naval bombardment, etc), and the Naval Aviation lost only 4 pilots. Most of the casualties among those forces were due to missile Sidewinder, which US provided and this was admitted by John Leman and also there's proof in british website naval history.
Argentina's total losses are 649 with 1088 wounded.
From those 649, nearly 50% were killed in the General Belgrano attack in 2nd May, out of the exlussion zone.
From the remaining 50 %, many were civilians forming the crew of requiitioned boats, such as 20 men from ARA Isla de los Estados, an unarmed logistic that was sunk by frigate Alacrity in the night of 8th May and nearly all the crew (WHICH died) was civilian sailors, very brave that were trying to reack food to Port howard garrison.
The only 3 civilian dead in Malvinas, was DUE to a british naval attack in 11th June.
In british website naval history, they explain that RFA and RMAS was integrated by asian civilians hired by the british and form which probably not all the losses suffered are recognised, since they're not british.
The army of Argentina was almost entirely made by conscript, very well armed in general, but with inadequate clothes, no experience in combat and some of only 3 months of training. Even so, they faced with dignity the british forces. In the Battle of Mount Longdon, Monte Dos Hermanas, and Monte Kent british reinforcements had to be called, and still it was very difficult to made them withdrawn. The argentine artillery had a very good performance in the battles of June, in spite of the lack of experience and the fact tha british artillery had longer range.
No abuses were reported by civilians living in the island, plus not a single women was raped or houses destroyed; what is more, civilians in Port Argentino had commandos living among them in their houses and they still were not shot or searched.
@@diegoargibay2287'near to defeated' is very different to being defeated my friend. Argentine forces lost every single contact with the British, never re-took any lost ground, and had lost 98% of the Falklands territory before offering terms of surrender. The only element that 'nearly defeated' the British, might have been having to travel 3000 miles to fight, something that had never before been achieved in military history. It was certainly nothing the Argentines had to offer. Keep dreaming if you like though.
Diego. War and glory yes?
British Lands Is Simply That British Land, If Anyone Thinks They Can Invade Our Sovereign Land Think Again, We Have One Of The Most Skilled Armed Forces In The World, Our Army Might Not Be Big But When We Fight We Fight To Win. 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
Joshie_ 1999 Why Do You Capitalize Every Word? Even The Articles! It Must Be Exhausting.
Fight? Can you tell me how many war crimes do uk? And Argentina?
At 7:12 "These German Argentines..."
'What did _you_ do during the war mein vater?'
Yes, I wonder....
Sorry, did the Pope seriously think he could go to a PROTESTANT country and tell them to request peace? Or am I misinterpreting it?
The Pope thinks he can tell everybody what's what.
What was England before king Henry changed
Still Christian.
@@helmutmaucher7593 Doesn't matter, he has no authority over a country that doesn't recognise his religion as their official religion.
@@specialunit0428I think RC is recognised as religion in the uk but your correct the queen is the head of the church of england
Underestimate the UK at your peril!!
For those who don't know, this is called journalism
14:15 seconds; Admiral Elmo Zumwalt was spot on with his military forecast. That's exactly how it played out. Very impressive.
True, but I think the Brits were more aggressive than he was thinking. They actually stormed Argentine positions and forced the issue on the battlefield rather than waiting out in some sort of siege like he was thinking. But otherwise he had it spot on.
That guy looks like Joe Biden lol xD
Back when the news was actually THE NEWS.
ABC News is still the same.
ABC World News Tonight in 1982 after 40 years it's iconic
Ronald Reagan - Can you not just let them have the Islands?
Mrs Thatcher - No
Ronald Reagan: Ok, here, have some weapons.
France: Oh dear my NATO Ally have a problem in South Atlantic i should give a help.....here Some Exocet Argentina
In 2013 the Falkland Islanders were asked whether or not they supported the continuation of their status as an Overseas Territory of the United Kingdom in view of Argentina's call for negotiations on the islands' sovereignty. On a turnout of 92%, 99.8% voted to remain a British territory, with only three votes against.
Wow... I would have been four or so at this time. My memories of the Falklands War are very vague now, or memories of hearing about it on Television. It’s very interesting seeing a US take , from a historical point of view. I’m used to BBC and ITN news reports from all those years ago.
Imagine being a local sheep farmer and you see a fucking tank come across your paddock
Luke Chadwick are you British? Do you like the USA and Americans?
Argentina just straight up lied on their news lol, they got their arses handed to them
Watching 1980s news feels so soothing and relaxingly weirdly.
Very interesting perspective - though some of the stock footage used is odd.
Yeah, the beaches on the Falklands look lovely.
The George Wallace redemption arc was an interesting inclusion
"I'm here with Elmo Zumwalt, and this is the CRAZIEST MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL YOU'VE EVER SEEN."
Frank Reynolds was the main anchor but was pulling weekend duty in this video. Maybe this was because of the Falklands Island conflict. Frank is great behind the desk. Roone Arledge was the mastermind of this great production including a captivating theme and my favorite news set of all time. Unfortunately, a short time after this broadcast just over one year later Frank Reynolds died at age 59. RIP Frank, you were one of the great ones.
Argentina gives a different version. Lol, right up until the point when we destroyed your army. We let you fools keep your country but that was only due to our grace. You're welcome.
Oh goddd😂😭
@@daneelolivaw602 how exactly did britain take a Terrible hiding?
@@zigwinger2915
My comment was meant for a different post, Apologies.
I miss news men like Frank Reynolds. Honest balanced reporting with no political agenda unlike the overpaid teleprompter readers we have today.
'Ill directed Rodomontade!' 😂🤣🇬🇧🇬🇧👍 I'm British and I still had to look up the meaning of 'Rodomontade'!!
The glorious English language!
Germans in Argentina???
My, my.... I wonder how THEY got there?
RULE BRITANNIA !!!!!
JOKE BRITANNIA MORE LIKE!
- your brave soldiers humiliated by old men with antique AK47s and RPG7s in Iraq.
- as above but Afghanistan
- Argies sunk 6 of your ships
-battered to a pulp by the Germans in WW2
-lots more humiliations
JOKE BRITANNIA
@@ajdar5582 But we laid claim to over 25% of the land on earth and hold the record for the largest known empire to ever exist..👀
- We won in Iraq. Saddam is dead as a dodo.
- Al Qaeda is no more. Bin Laden is dead.
- We won the war in the Falklands
- We beat Germany in WW2. Most war criminals ended up hiding in Argentina
- I've just humiliated your arse.
A D humiliated? The British army destroys the taliban at every fire fight. The taliban claimed western soldiers wouldn’t fight in close, the Brits affixed bayonets and charged.
The only war the Argentinians could win was the "Dirty War"
“2 to 1 advantage in troop strength” 😂 Just as well a Commando is worth 10 conscripts.
Not to mention most of the conscripts were further demoralised once they got to the Falklands. There are a bunch of reports about how the conscripts became confused once they realised how British the Islands were.
They expected Argentinians under British rule instead they found an English speaking people with the British flag flying proudly over homes and in pubs. Conscripts can do well if they have the numbers and the commitment to stand against an enemy force, they didn't have the commitment so surrendered in droves.
Why invade with conscripts then. Stupid twats! You can only beat what’s in front of you. Argentina sent young lads to die, that’s sad. As is the 255 young men the UK lost. This war was started because of a failing dictatorship. It was ended by a very good fighting force of land, sea and air.
"their territorial gains". How about recovered territory? 14:01
Watching news from Falkland War and hearing "Jan Paul" is just heart warming. Spoczywaj w pokoju Karol Wojtyła.
I read somewhere that both sides when not fighting were listening to their countries teams in the 1982 World Cup in host country Spain
Well that’s not true as the war was over weeks before the World Cup started.
There is nothing more predictable than a South American shouting "Pirate"
You can't deny that the British did send pirates here long ago, there's even the famous Drake passage that got its name from one of them. Now it refers more to someone who takes something that does not belong to them.
We don’t do that .. greetings from Chile 🇨🇱
The Argies on the islands should have surrendered as soon as they found out the task force had set off.
Where's the clip of Krusty the Clown pulling down a map of The Falkland Islands to explain to his young studio audience?
German immigrants giving their support. Don’t they ever learn the lesson! Although, I suppose offering support and losing is a bit different than trying to have a go and then losing.
Can’t believe the Americans referred to the islands as the Malvinas islands, it’s the falklands, they should have shown some respect for the young British men who died to take it back.
fuck the troops rot in hell imperialists
@@berkehan4808 650 of your guys are rotting in hell after that war 😂
@@gavinwilkinson3509 lmao im not even argentinian
I’m American and I speak English. It’s the falklands.
Sos de Estados Unidos, pero LOS ANGELES es LOS ANGELES, y COLORADO es COLORADO. Malvinas es Malvinas. Saludos
Can anyone remember how much help Britain got from the rest of the EU during this war? No, neither can I ...
Worse than not helping, France sold the Argies the Exocet missile, even after promising the UK they would stop the sale during the war. Another reason we can't stomach the French
@An honest chap they essentially did that to themselves after 6 weeks of combat
Like it says in the book bellow the line "Thy shall not get car fixed by an Irishman. "Thy shall never trust a French."
So proud that Ireland didnt support Britain
@@Donabate2 Northern Ireland did lol .
From that file footage it looks like we were landing at Inchon using US landing craft (and US Marines). We were never told about that part of the operation.
I just glad Admiral Zumwalt's strategy worked. Although I'm not so sure about the diversionary attack on Korea. Eyebrows were raised in Number 10 about that part.
Argentina and "Baghdad Bob" give a completely different version ! : D
It is quite simple really. Never ever give up you deterrents. In Britains case, the large supersonic jet carriers of the fleet air arm. The Argentinians knew this, and that's why they gambled and Britain had to scrape together a helicopter carrier and a old nearly decommissioned carrier to take slower limited range jump jets. It could have ended different for not the professionalism of our Armed forces.
9:57 - I love how the presenter interjects to explain to the audience what rodomontade means... Also imagine what would happen if today's Pope offered to step in to mediate!
The segment with Adm. Zumwalt is something that's missing from the news now.
The Papcy in these situations is usually worse than useless. In this case all the more so, as Jean-Paul almost certainly knew about the Dirty War, and the fact that 601 Brigade reported directly to Galtieri, but decided to treat him - the leader of a Government which murdered thousands of its own people - on equal terms with Thatcher (who, whatever you think of her, did not).
For those wanting to get to the report on George Wallace, skip to 16:00. Everything before that is about a war in the South Atlantic, or something
a lot of Italian/ Spanish blood? that's why a quick surrender then!!! 😂😂😂😂
@@crocodiletears6078 poor old deluded twat
@@ppp7277 hahaha you won the war on american sick😂😂😂😂
@@shahanarif4295 don't forget Islam is a cult and your a poodle follower who loves pork!!! 1😂😂
@@shahanarif4295 nah that's your cult leader Mohammed the biggest pedo 😂😂😂
@@crocodiletears6078 stfu you are clueless for a start there wasn't even 500,000 british soldiers in dunkirk you thick twat and it was the british who didn't surrender to the nazis unlike most of europe so by all means say britian ran away, just like America did in Vietnam I suppose?
thanks!
How wrong did the news stations get this? Absolute madness with all they knew about the fighting quality of both sides
There was a post script to this war, that came close to souring the UKs relationship with the USA. In 1983 US forces attacked the Caribbean island of Grenada. Although Grenada had become independent from Britain it was a member of the commonwealth, with the Queen as head of state. As such it was entitled to the protection of the commonwealth. The news provoked anger here in the U.K. and especially in Canada. So would there be a task force? Were we involved with a limited war with the US? In fact all ended amicably. The British governor was restored. The US departed friends even with the islanders. Just embarrassing. It left a feeling here that the US just wanted an easy little island war of its own. Not really understanding the workings of the commonwealth.
Thatcher was furious about it
The Admiral called it exactly how the British played it.
who else is just listening to this for no reason?
I saw an interview years ago with one of the British commanders who had written a book on military history. He had interviewed some Argentinian generals for his book, and had come to the conclusion that, because we Brits were close allies of the Americans like the Argentinians we would follow the same strategy, and head straight for Stanley.
But, because of the logistics train, especially after the sinking of the Atlantic Conveyor, we took a more subtle approach.
14:24 Admiral Zumwalt - The USN named a class of Destroyers after him
The ‘USS Zumwalt (DDG-1000)’
Rodomontade is not an archaic word. It's a French word that is still used today by literate people.
Frank Reynolds passed away one year later
Where the hell was the first report filmed? It looks tropical!
As you can see Argentina, the Harrier is OP
Remember the people that fought this war. Both Argentines and British troops need to be honored. Both sides should stop being salty.
view this Christmas Truce of World War I -- Joyeux Noel [2005 film]
The uk soldiers who do a war crime not be honored
JOAQUIN 146
@@raflaughter3474Argentina is now governed by leftists who were former Marxist terrorists, making even the slightest compliment to the junta now is a taboo for which the media will never forgive you. You need to stop thinking "in Argentina they are all Nazis", it is not the forties. The Military Junta was initially a Pinochet-style "communist-sweeping" pro-American dictatorship. The abrupt change was that when the economy collapsed and the protests for human rights increased, they looked for a way to be popular. Argentina is now absolutely dominated by the left (the province of Formosa even operates as a de facto communist dictatorship). The guy above does not support the Junta (no one does), in the schools they tell you that Britain is the invader.
John and Paul got involved..... where were George and Ringo?
I'd wager a vast number of the people commenting here were not even alive when the war took place as it was 38 years ago. I'm 59 and I remember only too well because I was part of it. Thatcher DID refuse to negotiate, but then why should she. The islands were at the time, had been for centuries, and still are, inhabited by British people. Even the minimum amount of research will reveal that the Faulklands were only ever under Argeninian rule for ONE year (1832). Britain colonised the islands in the 1760's. Argentina took them in 1832, Britain took them back in 1833. The islands are British, end of story. No blame lay at Thatchers door for the war, it was entirely the fault of the Argentine dictators that had the audacity to even suggest that islands that had been under British control for 220 years belonged to them.
Not even one full year, more like three months. The small Argentine garrison arrived on the Islands (under British protest) in early October 1832. On 2nd January 1833 HM Sloop Clio (Capt. Onslow) arrived. The following day Captain Onslow explained to the Argentines that they'd made a small mistake and asked if they'd mind awfully packing up and going home. The Argentine Commander, being a descent and sensible sort of chap, agreed that that would probably be best, all things considered. Not a shot was fired nor a drop of blood spilled.
The Argentine Army enjoyed another three month vacation on the Islands again 150 years later. Their departure on that occasion was rather more eventful. It's always a little awkward when guests overstay their welcome, don't you find?
I wouldn't like to admit my emotions, but it always makes me well up slightly when I hear that bit about the local civilians, even children, running ammunition back and forth for the British soldiers. They are as enthusiastic as the soldiers and it makes me so proud.
Royal marine seargent quote "argie barged in....we're here to kick em out"....the rest as they say..is history!!!
And the war crimes? Kill 4 civilians, raped soldieros, kill surrender soldiers, destroy general belgrano outside the battle zone, friend fire (its not a war crime, I know)
@@Elso_The_Argie even the captain of the Belgrano said the sinking was legal.
For anyone wondering about the news segment between timestamps 16:00-18:55.
George Wallace (governor of (the U.S. state) ‘State of Alabama’ won governorship and later became the ‘45th governor of Alabama’ for the third time.
(PS.: when this [video] aired, he was running for governor hints my choice of wording.)
l miss those days when the news was presented in a well balanced view from all sides. Back when the media was professional in all aspects. Not like the clowns we have now. l wonder how these reporters would have reported on Covid back then??