Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
2. Examining the Science of Hadith & The Main Shia Books - Sayed Jawad Qazwini - Masjid-e-Ali
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 лис 2015
- Muharram 23, 1437 / November 06, 2015
Eve of 24th of Muharram 1437AH
Copyright © 2015. Masjid-e-Ali, Somerset, N.J. All rights reserved. Any use of this video, without consent from the publisher, is prohibited.
Website: www.masjid-e-ali.org
Facebook: masjid.e.ali.nj
Twitter: masjid_e_ali_as
Instagram: MasjideAlinj
May Allah SWT bless you thank you
Good Khubta bro, but something is wrong with the voice/mic. sometimes too loud sometimes too low.
The violent terrorist i-e ISIS, talibaan quote Quranic verses too. Infact, much more than Sunni Hadith Books. So, as per your analysis, .... I think you got the point.
So let me get this straight? The verses before and the verses after are talking completely within the context of the wives but Allah decides to slip in a part of the verse that cuts the wives out of Ahlul Bayt (AS), giving the term a new meaning since all Arab speakers know that the wives are apart of your ahlul bayt. In other verses where Ahlul Bayt of different messengers were talked about the context included the wives. And to clarify this there is some sunni tradition that says the prophet (SAWS) stood outside Fatima's house for 9 months quoting that section of the verse indicating who ahlul bayt really is? How can one buy this?
I think Shiah who truly think about this issue will consider the goal in eliminating the wives from Ahlul Bayt (AS), again a term which in Arabic is the wives and kids, and in the context of the quran is talking within context within context of the wives. Shia cannot have the wives as part of Ahlul Bayt because of the fight between Ali (RA) and sitna Ayesha (RA). It unravels the entire school of thought to think of one "pure" person fighting with another "pure" person so therefore they have to put together conspiracy after conspiracy together to trying to keep their school together. The same goes with Abu Bakr (RA), Omar (RA), and Othman (RA). They have to be proven to be untrustworthy in order to maintain the shiah school because how could Ali (RA) go to those 3 men and remind them that he is supposed to be the khalifah and then they resist Ali (RA)? If it was spelled out as clear as day according to the shiah that Ali (RA) was supposed to be the khalifah then how could 3 great men ignore them. Hence the need for conspiracies against them.
Narrated Aisha:
One day the Prophet (S) came out afternoon wearing a black cloak (upper garment or gown; long coat), then al-Hasan Ibn ‘Ali came and the Prophet accommodated him under the cloak, then al-Husayn came and entered the cloak, then Fatimah came and the Prophet entered her under the cloak, then ‘Ali came and the Prophet entered him to the cloak as well. Then the Prophet recited: "Verily Allah intends to keep off from you every kind of uncleanness O’ People of the House (Ahlul-Bayt), and purify you a perfect purification (the last sentence of Verse 33:33)."
Sunni reference:
• Sahih Muslim, Chapter of virtues of companions, section of the virtues of the Ahlul-Bayt of the Prophet (S), 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, Arabic version, v4, p1883, Tradition #61.
Seriously to actually go through this lecture as an ex Shia was torture. He lies right left and centre and I’m painfully aware he knows it. The cheap talk of isis ignores that isis was a reaction to Shia dead squads that ethnically cleansed iraq.
Shias say that Imams practiced Taqiyyah to protect themselves. Outwardly, this looks a sound belief. But the reality is that the Imams practiced Taqiyyah in such minor issue, that only an ignorant will say he did it to protect his life.
Here are few examples from Bihar ul Anwar:
Where Adam landed after coming down from the Heaven
This, as you will understand easily, is the most negligible issue which no one would have even cared if there was any difference of opinion. Now read a Shia narration:
عن أبي جعفر عليه الصلاة والسلام قال إن آدم ع نزل بالهند فبنى الله تعالى له البيت وأمره أن يأتيه فيطوف به أسبوعا فيأتي منى وعرفات ويقضي مناسكه كما أمر الله
It is narrated from Imam Baqir that Adam landed in India. Allah built a home for him and ordered him to do its Tawwaf every week. So he would come to Mina and Arafat and perform the rituals as he was ordered by Allah.
Now read what Mulla Baqir Majlisi says regarding it:
بيان المشهور في أخبار أهل البيت ع أن نزول آدم ع كان على الصفا ونزول حواء على المروة وهذا الخبر وأمثاله يخالفها ويمكن حملها على التقية إذ المشهور بين العامة أن آدم ع هبط على جبل في سرنديب
The famous thing amongst the narrations of ahlel bayt is that Adam landed in Safa, and Hawa landed in Marwa. And this particular narration (regarding their landing in India) and the similar reports oppose such narrations, and it is possible that they are based on Taqiyyah as it is famous amongst the Sunnis that Adam (as) landed on a mountain in Sarandeep (i.e in Sri lanka).
Bihar ul Anwar, Vol. 11, p. 180
If Imam is doing Taqiyyah even in this kind of issue, understand that he is misguiding you only.
The sayings people quote as problems are obviously only a partial picture. There is not one battle or punishment enacted merely because of the other blaspheming, disbelieving, and apostatizing.
38:49 The sinful innovation is clear from Al Qoor'aan and the sayings of the prophet that it is not merely what is new. The prophet gave sermons and said things on the subject where sayings were preserved that make it known it is changing the rules of the faith; making the lawful unlawful, the sacred not sacred, the voluntary required, at cetera. Last I read, Saudi Arabia has banned all but 50 narrators of Hadith collections as banned from circulation. No one who knew Muhammad and most who knew those who knew him are allowed to be published from the manuscripts, except in small quotes from the libraries and collections in that country.
51:57 If Al Qoor'aan calls to all science and says Al Qoor'aan is the final word, how can we turn to what stands against those as reliable? I have shown how a number of those were actual twisted narrations from the Jews or something derived from others than Prophet Muhammad.
The people who criticize those who quote the imams quote someone who knew the International Prophet or even a quran commentator centuries later as if it was infallible.
If I had access to those four collections, I would read them in original and translation. I only have a selection of Shia Quotes about Massih ibn Maryam.
Puff
The assumption that this zindiqs actually have narrations from Ahl Bayt is the funny thing. Yes Ahl Bayt is the best source but they don’t take from them, they lie and constructed their business of shrine worship with their names
Kufr Ahadith