I got the F4 and very happy with it. I do portrait and events (indoor and outdoor) but with by R6, I can push the ISO and get the shot I need. The bokey is not much different especially at the extreme wide end.
The 14-35L f/4 has enormous distortion at the wide end that is being digitally doctored up with the resulting loss of resolution, especially in the corners. This may be ok for most of you but the 15-35L f/2.8 has much better optical corrections that don't need lots of doctoring up as a crutch, which maintains more resolution in the corners etc.
I went with the 2.8 for corner sharpness and I shout indoors like churches and museums and that extra stop of light makes a big difference even shooting with the R5.
this is clearly a "it depends" question. Many things in photography are "it depends'. I am the house photographer at a 180 seat music club. Many would think that 1.8 or 1.4 lenses are the order of the day. I opted for the 24-105 f4 Canon lens over the f2.8 version because I liked the longer reach. I use full frame cameras so bumping the ISO up a bit is not a problem for me. Sure, sometimes the f2.8 would be preferable but for the most part I do quite well with f4. For outdoor portraits I could go with either one. All depends how one shoots and what one shoots. For some f4 is not acceptable. I get it. Again, all depends. Thanks for the video! 🙂
Thank you for this comparison. 15-35mm f 2.8 for me definitely. It seems sharper and optically better (less distortion). I tend to shoot indoors every now and then (weddings, parties, temples, churches) so 15-35mm f 2.8 is my choice.
Sorry about the late comment, I just found your channel. Great comparison, however, in the 35mm shots it appears the 15-35 is focused on the bricks whereas the 14-35 is focused on the citrus foliage. Was that manual or auto focus?
Hey Alex, awesome and informative video! I’ve developed an insatiable interest in photography. Your video help me to understand the type of lens I should buy depends on what I’m going to be shooting. I like shooting landscape so the best lens for me would be 15-35mm with a f4 aperture. I also fly a PHANTOM 4 Drone which has a pretty sophisticated camera mounted on it and I’m learning how to use the different shooting modes when I fly. I will be subscribing to your channel because I’m learning a lot from you about the ends and outs of photography! Please keep producing those great and informative video…thy are quite invaluable…take care
Hey Alex! Thanks for your video! I am still uncertain what to do - I'll be in Japan for the next 6 months and I do not know if the RF14 or RF15 would be better.. I could get the RF15 as good as new for only 300 dollars more, what do you think?
Hey bud, the benefit the 14 has is of coarse, weight and size much smaller. If you don’t mind, the weight, go with the 15 all the way sharper lens with a few more tricks up its sleeve.
Unfortunately I see a superior result with the 2.8 with your sample shots. I was hoping to get away with the f4, but if I do that, I’ll always lament as I’m not strong enough to resist nice photography gear. What’s that saying, cry once….?
Interesting comparison. Pretty subtle differences. Of course I'm excited to get adapters so I can use my 55mm f2.8 and 200mm f4 Pentax lenses on my Sony Nex-3n and Nikon 1 J5! Not quite the same league but exciting to me!
@@photographytalk had Covid so just now getting back in the swing of things. Taking pictures this week of our city fair for the newspaper. Using the Sony NEX-3N for last night and Nikon 1 J5 for Saturday, if it is sunny. Saw little man is learning baseball. How fun!
@@paultemple3031 Glad you are doing better! Do you all have a big fair there? Our just ended. Yeah! He is loving it, just working on his form and keeping an eye on the ball!
Thanks for this in depht comparaison. If thé pros ans cons for still photographe is pretty well covered, I'm deeply waiting for a similar "analytical" examination of +'s/-'s f2.8 vs F4 for vidéo.
No. This ridiculous cycle by camera makers is not sustainable. Why do we "need" the latest? Trying to sell more and more gear to fewer and fewer people cannot last. Eventually the impact of UA-cam influencers will diminish, and that will be that. Have a nice day.
Hey bud I couldn't agree more. If you watch enough of my videos you'll find reviews done recently of older cameras, some upwards of 40 years old. I'm a big fan of 'you don't need the latest'. Now what I do try to do is share as much of what I can get my hands on in hopes to help people make educated decisions on if a product is right for them. Hope this adds perspective on where my compass is pointed. Stay well new friend!
I got the F4 and very happy with it. I do portrait and events (indoor and outdoor) but with by R6, I can push the ISO and get the shot I need. The bokey is not much different especially at the extreme wide end.
The 14-35L f/4 has enormous distortion at the wide end that is being digitally doctored up with the resulting loss of resolution, especially in the corners. This may be ok for most of you but the 15-35L f/2.8 has much better optical corrections that don't need lots of doctoring up as a crutch, which maintains more resolution in the corners etc.
I went with the 2.8 for corner sharpness and I shout indoors like churches and museums and that extra stop of light makes a big difference even shooting with the R5.
Congrats! The 2.8 is such an amazing lens!
@@photographytalk Finally came in so happy with it, took it to the Getty day 1 LOL. Oh was on sale for 1999 so only 500 more than the f4 woot.
Well this video would have been super helpful for me to watch 8 months ago. One of the more comprehensive ones I've watched on this topic. Thank you.
You rock Thomas, thank you for stopping by and supporting the channel today!
Been dreaming of a 15-35 for awhile. Great video bud. Thanks for all the feedback.
Have you looked on used market? You can find some sweet deals on used with this lens, save a few bucks. Thank you for the kind words!
this is clearly a "it depends" question. Many things in photography are "it depends'. I am the house photographer at a 180 seat music club. Many would think that 1.8 or 1.4 lenses are the order of the day. I opted for the 24-105 f4 Canon lens over the f2.8 version because I liked the longer reach. I use full frame cameras so bumping the ISO up a bit is not a problem for me. Sure, sometimes the f2.8 would be preferable but for the most part I do quite well with f4. For outdoor portraits I could go with either one. All depends how one shoots and what one shoots. For some f4 is not acceptable. I get it. Again, all depends. Thanks for the video! 🙂
Thank you for this comparison. 15-35mm f 2.8 for me definitely. It seems sharper and optically better (less distortion). I tend to shoot indoors every now and then (weddings, parties, temples, churches) so 15-35mm f 2.8 is my choice.
Yes, the newer UWA RF glass is great, but that adapted EF 16-35 F4 IS L is still wonderful on the R bodies.
Excellent Comparison Video! Well Done Alex! Thank You.
Doug, you rock brother! Thank you for the feedback, it's always appreciated!
Help.....F2.8 vs F4 if shooting surfing photos and video in the water. Canon R5C with a water housing. Thanks for the great video.
Sorry about the late comment, I just found your channel. Great comparison, however, in the 35mm shots it appears the 15-35 is focused on the bricks whereas the 14-35 is focused on the citrus foliage. Was that manual or auto focus?
Hey Alex, awesome and informative video! I’ve developed an insatiable interest in photography. Your video help me to understand the type of lens I should buy depends on what I’m going to be shooting. I like shooting landscape so the best lens for me would be 15-35mm with a f4 aperture. I also fly a PHANTOM 4 Drone which has a pretty sophisticated camera mounted on it and I’m learning how to use the different shooting modes when I fly. I will be subscribing to your channel because I’m learning a lot from you about the ends and outs of photography! Please keep producing those great and informative video…thy are quite invaluable…take care
Happy to hear, you rock new friend!
Excellent comparison between f/2.8 and f/4!!
Thank you for the kind words!
Hey Alex! Thanks for your video! I am still uncertain what to do - I'll be in Japan for the next 6 months and I do not know if the RF14 or RF15 would be better.. I could get the RF15 as good as new for only 300 dollars more, what do you think?
Hey bud, the benefit the 14 has is of coarse, weight and size much smaller. If you don’t mind, the weight, go with the 15 all the way sharper lens with a few more tricks up its sleeve.
The Galata Tower landscape behind you looks awesome.
Unfortunately I see a superior result with the 2.8 with your sample shots. I was hoping to get away with the f4, but if I do that, I’ll always lament as I’m not strong enough to resist nice photography gear. What’s that saying, cry once….?
For me , zoom lenses at f4 is just right. If i need a faster lens , i get prime lenses.
Another awesome video PT, keep it up.
Thank you!!!
Excellent video! I shoot everything and need the low light capabilities, so it's the 15-35 for me.!
It would be great to see photos on the night with low light to know if the difference of the aperture really worth the price.
Interesting comparison. Pretty subtle differences. Of course I'm excited to get adapters so I can use my 55mm f2.8 and 200mm f4 Pentax lenses on my Sony Nex-3n and Nikon 1 J5! Not quite the same league but exciting to me!
Hey Paul, how are you doing buddy?! Exciting! You been getting out much?
@@photographytalk had Covid so just now getting back in the swing of things. Taking pictures this week of our city fair for the newspaper. Using the Sony NEX-3N for last night and Nikon 1 J5 for Saturday, if it is sunny. Saw little man is learning baseball. How fun!
@@paultemple3031 Glad you are doing better! Do you all have a big fair there? Our just ended. Yeah! He is loving it, just working on his form and keeping an eye on the ball!
City fair is big in our city but it is still a pretty typical small town fair. Lots of fun though.
Thanks for this in depht comparaison.
If thé pros ans cons for still photographe is pretty well covered, I'm deeply waiting for a similar "analytical" examination of +'s/-'s f2.8 vs F4 for vidéo.
This helped me decide. Thank you for the detailed information. Sub added!!!
So what your decide ?
That shirt earned my subscription
Lol grunt style are for bro vets just out of Basic Training who can't go a day without a "thank you for your service"
No. This ridiculous cycle by camera makers is not sustainable. Why do we "need" the latest? Trying to sell more and more gear to fewer and fewer people cannot last. Eventually the impact of UA-cam influencers will diminish, and that will be that. Have a nice day.
Hey bud I couldn't agree more. If you watch enough of my videos you'll find reviews done recently of older cameras, some upwards of 40 years old. I'm a big fan of 'you don't need the latest'. Now what I do try to do is share as much of what I can get my hands on in hopes to help people make educated decisions on if a product is right for them. Hope this adds perspective on where my compass is pointed. Stay well new friend!
First 4 minute to 5 min is only intro
A lot of repetition - and far too long👎
Sorry you didn't enjoy the video Neil. Hope you have a better day!
Bla bla bla go straight to the point.
LOL sure thing.
It informative, especially to newer photographers, the thought process from which to derive your selection. He nailed this!