NLAW Anti Tank Missile | Panzerfaust 3 Anti Tank Weapon
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 бер 2022
- NLAW Anti Tank Missile | Panzerfaust 3 Anti Tank Weapon
This video you will see a comparison between two anti - tank weapon systems. One is NLAW anti-tank Missile system and another one is Panzerfaust 3 anti - tank weapon.
Panzerfaust is made by Germany and
NLAW is made by United Kingdom and Sweden
#nlaw #panzerfaust
![ОРБАН приехал к ПУТИНУ и "отчитался" о поездке в Киев 😁 [Пародия]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_0ukDovOWq8/mqdefault.jpg)
I think most commentators are missing the point. The NLAW is really for destroying tanks, command and control vehicles, missile and artillery batteries and APCs out in open ground and at a relatively safely distance for infantry. It's accuracy and 'shoot and scoot' mode ensures the enemy has little chance of returning fire. The Panzerfaust 3 is more up close and personal. It will be far superior in defending urban areas. These are both outstanding NATO frontline weapons. Keep them coming in volume to the Ukrainian military. Long live a democratic Ukraine and fuck Putin.
It depends on if you only use the standard sight or the computing sight with the PF3. The computing sight helps to engage even moving targets accurately from a distance of up to 600 meters. It still lacks the capability to change trajectory in flight, when compared to the NLAW.
I hope panzerfausts make their way to Mariupol and they rain havoc down on the invading orcs from every building.
@@Schnittertm1 No doubt, but when you're fighting amongst the rubble, I'd take a backpack of PF3's all day, every day. Just glad we're all on the same side, and giving Ukraine the full suite of options.
😙
🤡Democratic Ukraine ? This new regime has unconstitutionaly change the government in 2014 (number of votes not reached). The destitution of the Ianoukovich government was a middle finger to the democracy, while the presence a influence of american politicians during this circus was a middle finger to the sovereinty of ukraine. Moreover, the ukrainian in the Donbass where treated like animals by Porochenko. War crimes where committed against civilians. Don't talk about democracy, morals or anything of that matter, that's just laughable..
The Panzerfaust 3 is more a tool for everything, bunkers, vehicle, breaching etc
yes
💪
Basically designed for, well...what there Germans did a lot "invade everything" 🤣🤣🤣 sad huh...
@@brainthesizeofplanet mhh invading is also a british thing...
Useful against an incoming Russian armor vehicles encroaching Kiev
Not really, the NLAW has a direct fire mode too.
I think both are good in its way. They are not comparable. The panzerfaust 3 is maybe comparable to rpg7 but with better penetration. In my eyes panzerfaust is better for close combat in the city. Open a window and shot tank. No lock on needed. Crouch arround the corner and shot. Nlaw might be better for larger distance and fast moving targets because of its guided missle
Also the Panzerfaust 3 has a squash-head attack mode, so it's more destructive for anything that's not a tank.
@@neutronalchemist3241 nope there are multipile variants the T or IT variants are for killing tanks
Panzerfaust has more penetration and explosive power tho? It's literally made to take down TANKS while the RPG7 is for light armor military vehicles.
@@aggravated_assault Nope. You obtain the squash effect in AT rockets simply by not extending the probe.
@@neutronalchemist3241 but it dumb to use the T/IT version wich this video fucusses on as a hesh rocket, the DM 72 A1 round is literally only useable agianst amored vehicles
The NLAW is showing it's colors right now since most of the combat is rural, with ambushes from brush or over fields against convoys, which is pretty much exactly what the NLAW was designed to do, while PZF3 is more of an urban combat weapon. If/when the Russian are trying to push into cites and fight door to door, the PZF3 will be the dominate AT at that point.
An important point is that you can get multiple panzerfausts for the cost of a single nlaw. When it comes to ammo itself, the panzerfaust's cost advantage is even higher.
@DeEater I believe either 3 or 4, I've seen different numbers for costs. I'm sure the NLAW is also good, but unless the difference is really massive (and I don't think it is) I'd rather have a lot more guys shooting em.
@DeEater 4 plus re usage is way cheaper
Both weapons are relatively cheap compared javelins. And I think it is more important to get the job done at first time, because it very likely that you don't get second shot.
Both are very effective weapons IMO.
@@fischer-3934 You're more likely to get the job done the first time if you have two soldiers firing instead of just one.
The main advantage of the Panzerfaust is and remains its cheap and simple construction, as well as its reloadability. The price of a Panzerfaust 3 is said to be between 10,000 and 12,000 euros. Accordingly, many of them can be purchased, which is not insignificant tactically for weapons systems with a short range. Weapons with a higher hit probability, such as the NLAW, are of course always preferable from the point of view of the soldier using them. An officer tasked with defending a larger area or holding a certain point for longer will prefer several Panzerfaust 3s, I think.
Pzf 3 is literally a tank can opener and it's more effective on Urban warfare when fighting on narrow streets and for ambushes.
They are distant cousins really. Different use for different situations.
I'm pleased that Ukraine has both, the Russians will suffer greatly in Urban Warfare due to these weapons and the bravery of their people
The Panzerfaust is not a direct comparison as it can be used for close in combat around a built up environment like a city. Two deadly but different machines.
Spot on. I watched a video of a Ukrainian fighter in a demolished apartment block in Mariupol, fire an NLAW at a Russian tank at very close quarters from above. It didn't even have time to engage its main thrusters properly and bounced off the tank. A PF3 fired from above at 50 metres would have taken the turret off. Open country or at distance, use the NLAW/Javelin and close combat/urban use the PF3 or similar. The right tool for the right job.
@@ianworley8169 The Panzerfaust 3 was specificaly made to be excellent in Urban combat beeing one of the few that can fire from closed rooms. The lack of lock on is actually an upside as you just need to peak, shoot leave. No lock on step. Versatility is also in its Design, so if you want it actually can lock. Calculate distance and give you a Digital aim point. It can easily destroy fortifications and is cheap enough to be used also against the smalled vehicles. The Panzerfaust 3 brings hell in Urban warfare and is at least up standart capable in other environments. Love it
Panzerfaust legend!
yes
Old school name, modern day weapon, classical results.
Sometimes we germans make good Work😀
NLAW muzzle velocity is NOT the missile velocity, its soft launched at 40 m/s, then the rocket engine kicks in.
yep and then it's also travelling with 200 m/s
I love Germany from Uzbekistan ❤👍
❤️
👍
Love Uzbekistan from Germany.🇩🇪🇺🇿
When Russia attacks Uzbekistan, what surely will Happen, Uzbekistan will get some Panzerfaust too
One thing you didn't mention is the price, the nlaw is a lot more expensive, it's also a different kind of weapon, which is why the nlaw is more expensive
Yes the most similar weapon to NLAW which Germany is currently buying for its military is the Wirkmittel 1800+, though the German weapon is more for unarmored or lightly armored vehicles at longer ranges (up to 2.000m).
Apart from that Germany has currently various unguided rockets (Panzerfaust 3, Wirkmittel 60, Wirkmittel 90,...) in various versions from anti-structure, HE against infantry to anti-tank rockets.
The primary ATGM will be MELLS (Israeli Spike LR) which is used by the infantry on a tripod or mounted on vehicles (Puma IFV, Marder IFV and Wiesel 1) to replace Milan and TOW.
These are 2 different weapon systems you can't compare , you should compare the Panzerfaust 3 with the RPG 7
Uh the NLAW can also be used in confined spaces and can detonate within 20 meters of a target.. NLAW has two modes. Direct fire attack or OTA = Over fly top attack. The OTA makes it capable of penetrating any Main Battle Tank. It has PLOS targeting. Aim a few seconds at a moving target and the missile self adjust according to the pre-calculation of speed and has magnetic sensors too I think. It has a shape charged that penetrate armor. "Molten copper". If not mistaken it's a tandem charge as well if they kept that from the Bill 2 warhead.. That means a 1st charge detonating taking out ERA and then the shape charge 90 degree tank penetrator charge.
The NLAW is better for ambush and taking out vehicles fast. You only need to see the tiniest sliver of a tank in hiding behind a ridge or the ass behind a wall. It will track and hit.
The NLAW = British Javline
@@franzfanon229 NLAW is a Swedish weapon design. It's a joint venture with UK. UK with Thales manufacture it and Swedish SAAB Bofors designed the weapon.
@@loki76 Both
@@loki76 It's a joint development. Meaning both nations had input and function criteria it had to meet, it's not one nation more than the other. Its equal British and Swedish.
The Panzerfaust is better for an ambush, you point it at your target and press fire, it hit's the target instantly. mean while NLAW starts to go far walk slowly closing in on the target...
Also Panzerfaust3 can be fired with several types of ammo.
Germany always has sick
Amazing names for their weapons. Just hearing the name makes you fear the weapon. Like Sturmgewehr 😂
From Germany -with love. 😄
The Panzerfaust 3 is high effective against reactive amors
Yes.. And more powerful
@@defencelearning2785 More powerful how? It seems you don't know the differences between these weapons platforms..
The Panzerfaust attack to the SIDE of the tank. It has to penetrate the thickest armor and ERA plates..
The NLAW is TOP attack and penetrates on the top of the tank where armor is barely 100-200mm thick. The NLAW is almost guaranteed to penetrate any tank. The Panzerfaust isn't.
So which is more powerful again?
@@loki76 That's not correct sorry.
The NLAW is not attacking from above like the Javelin.
No direct hit on the Top.
It has two modes:
DA = Direct Attack (like the Panzerfaust 3)
and:
OTA = Overfly Top Attack
In OTA Mode the missle flies 1m over the target and explode. Without hitting the target directly.
The missle flies on a straight line to the target. Just 1m above the direct hit line.
It doesn't gain height like the Javelin for an direct hit from above.
It just overflys the target and detonates above it.
@@PGTornado You cannot be THAT stupid can you? How is it not attacking from above the tank when that is LITERALLY what OTA is.. The missile flies OVER the tank and detonates ABOVE the tank roof with a shaped charge.. Just because the trajectory of the missile isn't flying upwards and then downwards doesn't mean it's not an attack from above. It flies ABOVE the tank and fired DOWNWARD.. The question here isn't the flight path of the missile it's the way it attacks in both cases it's top attack. Not side attack. You cannot attack something at the top without also being ABOVE the target.
@@loki76 Can you read?
Read my comment again and count how many times I wrote the word "above".
Your entire answer is pointless.
You wrote in your first comment that NLAW is TA (TOP Attack). And that's just wrong. It's OTA.
These are simply 2 completely different modes of operation and 2 different explosive devices. One uses HEAT the other mostly EFP.
And there is a big difference between a missile hitting a target directly from a height of 150 m at 500 m/s and the fact that the missle is just exploding 1 m above the target. In overflight. Especially when using reactive armor.
Both can be deadly.
But NLAW is NOT an top attack weapon like Javelin or Hellfire.
Outsiders and those with little military knowledge both may call it a Top Attack weapon. But at the expert level you make this difference.
Sorry. Don't know your level.
As long as they lay waste to Ruski tanks, i'm good with either!
The Germans love their rockets🤙🤙🤙🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪
❤️❤️
you know the price per shot for the systems? i think, the Panzerfaust is the absolutly cheapest aktual system against heavy tanks...
A NLAW costs about 37.000$ per shot. A Panzerfaust 3 firing mechanism costs 10.000-11.000$, but then each rocket costs only 300$, so you can use it much more liberally against trucks, jeeps, APCs...
@@neutronalchemist3241 Jesus I could not believe it. But yes it is true, 300 bucks for HE round and only 200 dollars for a bunkerfaust round. That's less than half a decent shotgun for Christ's sake. Unreal.
The cost of the system is what makes it so great.....the Panzerfaust 3 like the original is very cost affective.....just imagine every other soldier carrying one......a Russian tankers worst nightmare......just like Berlin in 1945.
Two very different system, they are both extremely effective, but one is a missile the other is a rocket.
The NLAW is a top down attack missile, the Panzerfaust is a tandem war head direct impact rocket.
The NLAW is one type of weapon, the Panzerfaust has a few different type of rounds designed for different purposes, everything from anti tank to anti bunker.
Only one of the Panzerfaust 3 rounds is guided, the others are point and shoot and hope you had your cross hairs on the target.
One of the benefits of the Panzerfaust 3 is that it can punch through way more armor, 900mm with ERA and 1300mm without ERA
And the Panzerfaust is the only weapon which Can be Used in closed rooms. Very effektive in urban scenarios when you Shot from cellars,bunkers, Or other rooms.
With the new electronic sight the Panzerfaust 3 can hit moving target at 600m and stationary targets at over 1km, that combined with the higher penetration, 5 times faster speed (gets to the target quicker leaving less chance for the target to disappear or deploy countermeasures) and being more low tech (not susceptible to electronic warfare countermeasures). All in all I would hope the NLAW gets developed further, being a self guided missile it would benefit from having more range, 3-5km would be ideal. Right now the NLAW and Panzerfaust have basically the same use case and the Panzerfaust is simple better and cheaper for that use case.
The NLAW are probably more accurate as it is a guided missile
Yes.. But for more muzzle velocity panzerfaust is better
@@defencelearning2785 it doesnt matter if you dont hit. The Panzerfaust should in my opinion be compared with Pansarskott 86 (AT4)
@@jeriksson7686 The PzF 3 is way better against Tanks than the AT4
@@defencelearning2785 actually your stats are incorrect: The NLAW missle flies just the first 20m with 40m/s from than on the speed increases to 200m/s or 0.7 Mach. So it's not that much slower than the Panzerfaust 3.
@@jeriksson7686 I believe a comparison with the Carl Gustav will be more appropriate.
NLAW is good but Panzerfaust 3 is better. We all love Germany, you know you are right.
❤️
I woudlnt go that far. The NLAW is a cheap guided missile system and highly effective. That is nothing short of amazing. But the pzf 3 is also hillariously good at all the various things it does while costing basically just an apple and a belly rub
the panzerfaust is something for everyday needs..if, for example, the Russians have a quick visit..easy to use and effective 😅🇩🇪🤘
👍
lol
Perfect home defence weapon
So the Panzefaust is pretty much what happens when you give the Germans a RPG-7 and say: "PLS MAKE BETTER".
an original is usually always better than a copy
Both systems are my favourite. Both with their own advantages and disadvantages. I think the Javelin is overrated, these two however are geniusly made and I am glad for the Ukrainians to have both systems. Russia will see hell when they go Urban
Overrated? HOW? The javelin is amazing, it has it's uses. It's lock on target system and top attack, with the ability to fire inside of a tiny room out a window with the low backblast version without hurting yourself or others.
@@PBMS123 Price. Its just the express version of a weapon capable of the same
@@little_lord_tam Sorry I dont know what extrpess means, it's not a word in English
@@little_lord_tam the javelin has the advantage of almost being a portable TOW. As far as i know, it can effectively defeat targets up to 2000 metres, and i dont think you need to be sherlock holmes to see that the javelin is comparable to a bolt action sniper rifle wheras the nlaw and panzerfaust 3 would be something like an assault rifle. Theyre used at different ranges. No matter how good of a shot you are, hitting a target with the Panzerfaust at 900 metres, potentially a moving target is nearly impossible, just look at the targeting system. Its basically just a scope with maybe 3 times magnification, i dont have correct data at hand, but its definitely not near the javelins targeting capabilities.
All right, making it pretty niche. The majority of losses happen either by artillery in the open or by hand portable launchers in cities. The Javelin is best at what it does, I just think that people overrate its usefulness. That doesnt make it bad, it just wouldnt be my first solution to a armor problem. Plus, the Javelin is far too expensive to fight fortifications and that is a extremly massive drawback. It does one thing, kill MBTs on range and that, it excells at @@shangri-leicht8923
The Panzerfaust 3 is cheap, simple, quite effective and can be used against tanks and also bunkers.
Yes
These are two totally different systems. It' s like comparing a dentist with a gynecologist.
Both are very good 👍👍
💪
Shooting PzFst3 out of a romm is like a angels kiss on your head. 😇✨♥
👍
A bit of an apple v orange comparison, although they are both primarily intended for use on tanks, vehicles. The Nlaw “Over the top” option is a huge difference and advantage.
And the costs ?
40m/s for NLAW is not correct, this is only the start tube speed#
another version ist the Panzerfaust 3 / 600
The choice of prefered weapon totally depends on the environment. No one in their right mind would prefer an NLAW over a Panzerfaust in urban combat, and no one in their right mind would prefer a Panzerfaust over an NLAW with a target 1.5 kilometres away on an open field.
From the get go, you really really can't compare these two. It's like comparing a mortar with a laser guided bomb.
Doesn't Sweden use Carl Gustavs or is it lighter damage for smaller targets?
Carl gustav is 84mm it's too weak for MBT's for the most, sweden uses a combenation of Carl Gustavs AT4's and Nlaw depending on unit and targets, Carl and AT4s are for lightly armored vechiels buildings and Troops and some times rare end of MTBs and Nlaw is MBT from any angle.
80 thousand american dollars for Javelin, 40 thousand for nlaw, and about 2 thousand per panzerfaust round.
👍
Panzerfaust rockets cost 200 to 300 Euro
The NLAW has a downward fire mode OTA to attack thinner armour on the upper side.
If you get hit with NLAW you have to have your windows closed, but if you want survive panzer you need to open your hatches for over pressure. Problem is to know which is which.
NLAW is top attack.
The missile flies above the target and the warhead fires downward penetrating the thinnest parts of the tanks armor.
👍
It can do both attack modes: direct attack and the so called overfly top attack mode
@@TheBepo1986 Direct attack is for softer targets.
But usually your squad will also have AT4's at hand to use against such things.
German Fans when they heard "Panzer": German Weapon the best
Thats true. the American Abrams, the British Challenger and the German Leopard are all armed with a gun produced by Rheinmetall in Germany
It is a close combat weapon ATM developed by bofors, a swedish company
40m/s velocity is the soft launch. Actual flight velocity rises to 200m/s. Get your facts straight.
Dynamit Nobel AG?
Alfred Nobel ?
Yes he invented dynamite and founded that company.
Probably worth noting that the NLAW is good against concealed targets, although I am sure the PZF3 has its uses too. Horses for courses.
Price!?!?!?!?! You really should be given price comparison in this videos. It matters everything!
Each round for Panzerfaust 3 round depending on it's role costs only 200-300 dollars. The Fire mechanism and optical sight which can be re used cost 10.000 each. So starting cost of like 20.000 and then each round like 250 dollars. So each round is shockingly cheap if a soldiers doesn't get blown up. I think each Nlaw missile costs I believe around 20.000 British pounds in comparison(around 26.000 dollars)
Think it needs to be detailed a bit more, for example the NLAW can be fired more accurately due to locking, and although the penetrating is hugely different on both, NLAWs will go for weakspots in it's computing.
The NLAW can be used in enclosed structures as well.
one thing is missing: the price tag!
I feel like carrying around this bulky NLAW all day in a battleflied must be the horror, then you shoot one time and it's done. What if it didn't work out or you need more, you most probably can not walk back to get another one.
It probably has it uses at nearly max distance and the tank dug in the field or if you are in a fixed position and you have a few leaning against the wall but overall it seems very limited. Then it also has 4 times the cost of a Panzerfaust 3 if my quick search is correct.
With the new electronic sight the Panzerfaust 3 can hit moving target at 600m and stationary targets at over 1km, that combined with the higher penetration, 5 times faster speed (gets to the target quicker leaving less chance for the target to disappear or deploy countermeasures) and being more low tech (not susceptible to electronic warfare countermeasures). All in all I would hope the NLAW gets developed further, being a self guided missile it would benefit from having more range, 3-5km would be ideal. Right now the NLAW and Panzerfaust have basically the same use case and the Panzerfaust is simple better and cheaper for that use case.
If the NLAW was to have a range of 3--5 km then it would have to be bigger and heavier as it would need more than 3 times as much fuel. That would make it bulky and much heavier. What would be the advantage of such a weapon for NATO when for targets at a distance they use airpower? In the European theatre of operations, it is unusual to have ground line of sight an targets that far away. It is no coincidence that the longest tank on tank kill (4.7 km) took place in the Iraqi desert ( m.ua-cam.com/video/WAZlPbVay28/v-deo.html )
@@firstlast7052 much can be done by improving efficiency such as rocket motor efficiency or better light weight construction or an improved war head. The Javelin is not much bigger as a missile but gets almost 10 times the range. Even if that range is not always needed it still has it's merit like when shooting from vantage points such as hills or buildings where you can easily see 20 km on a good day.
Hello from Ukraine!
Thank you for comparison. I am not a soldier, at least yet, so for me it’s quite informative. A lot of different kinds of weapons come to Ukraine, so we have to know as much as possible about these technologies to fight well.
Thank you for support!
Thank you so much.. Stay blessed!
Comparing a RPG launcher to a guided missile launcher lol.
Both are qualified to be inducted into my Russian Tank buster arsenal. I'ii order them in my next visit to UK and Germany.👮🏼♂👨🏼✈️
The NLAW is only downside is reloading it,
Be interesting to know the price per shot.
Ukrainians will tell us who is the best!
Exactly
PzF3 would be comparable to Carl Gustav M4 than NLAW
Panzerfaust is a generation older that NLAW.
Only the concept is older, and the intended use is different, but the Panzerfaust will still ruin your day if you ever decide to fight someone who has it.
Can both get through Shtora and Arena APS which are installed on command tanks operating in Ukraine T-72B3K Model 2016 T-80 BVMK T-90AK T-90MSK. If that were to be the case you need one of them to trick the active protection system the other one finishes off the command tank
Питання стосовно nlaw: Що робити якщо кнопка Пуск утоплена? Пристрій без акума. Чи пробував хтось розбирати панель керування для повернення кнопки Пуск в бойове положення?
NLAW Issue: What's the solution for turning back up Fire button pushed down while training? Device is without battery. Is there any solution? Maybe someone was trying to disassembly the button-control right-arm handle?
It’s a can opener, go for the top
Dont even need to do it a PF 3 can Frontaly fuck everything that’s not an t90mv Easley enougth xD
As other comments have pointed out this is like comparing apples and orages. For example the NLAW is designed to penetrate top armour while the Panzfaust is designed to his any direct line of sight armour. So simply comparing the thickness of armour the weapons can penetrate is pointless. Your vidio comparing the Panzfaust with the RPG-29 "Vampir" is a much better video in this respect. I do not know which RPG is in common use with the Ukrain Army and how many they have left, but whatevr it is be in RPG-7 or RPG-29, that would make a more informative video.
Also Panzfausts (1) and RPG-7s were used by defenders in both the Battle of Berlin and the Battle of Grozny at street level typically basements with a door or a window looking out onto the street, while machine gunners took position above them at a height greater than tanks could elevate their main guns. If top armour is weaker and side and front armour is impervious to RPGs then perhapes the rocket men will fire from upper stories, although this leaves them more exposed to both to suppresive fire before they fire and counter fire one they have done so.
I know the NLAW has almost zero backblast, unsure of the Panzerfaust does
It's recoilless
@@ssm445 Being recoilless has nothing to do with not having backblast. But the PF 3 uses particles to "swallow" the back blast.
what about cost/price
I think the Russians will be the judge of this
Two things:
1): What does each one cost?
2:) What do you meant by "missile" and "rocket"? Both are rockets.
Didn't include cost, i'd like to know how much bang for the buck i'm getting.
Guys do the panzerfaust 3 have a "lock on" mode like the NLAWS/JAVELINS? Sorry i have very little knowledge to such thanks 👍👍👍
No it does not. It's like an RPG7
No...like a bullet
The Panzerfaust 3 IT has an older system that works similar to the NLAW but is less capable. It has a targeting computer that calculates lead. Through that the max effective range of the Panzerfaust 3 is increased to around 600 m. But once fired the warhead follows its ballistic path. It dosent have any electronics inside so it cant steer itself but is also a lot cheaper.
In the NLAW the seqence is simillar, so lead is calculated but then the missile gets INS programming so it holds the calculated flight path even if there are influences on the missile like weather/wind.
BUT unlike the Javelin the missile dosent lock onto a target. It follows a flight path. So through manouvers it is theoretically possible to dodge it which is nearly impossible with a Javelin.
Note that I write "theoretically". The NLAW still travels at 200m/s so depending how far the target is away there is only between 1 and 5 seconds to react and that is if you see the missile coming your way.
@@FireLord459 thank you bro 😊
Pricer per shot?
This is like comparing coke to water
40 m/s for the NLAW. That not true. It is about 440 mph...that's about 200 meters a second. Sorry !
Panserfaust is a Carl Gustav 'wannabe' 😉 Carl is so much more flexible and deadly in the right hands.
The new M4 is very light, new advanced day/night with ballistic computers are available.
And all new.. Laserguided rounds with a range of 2000 meters.
We(Denmark) will use these(with all the different types of ammunition available)
On the platoon level.
The squads will have M72 EC(Enhanced Capability) and AT-4 available.
And then Spike LR2 on top ✌️
. Mounted(CV9035 and Piranha 5) and dismounted.
The more of these Systems the NATO has, the better
In think the Panzerfaust 3 looks cooler
The most critical element in any battle: being at the right place at the right time with the right kit and training. the British supplied NLAWs were there to stop the russians while the Panzerfaust were in storage.. as usual the Brits were weeks ahead of the EU.... supplying the best weapons in the world and training while the EU was missing Putins Arse. Thankfully the EU seems to have been woken up..
Ps I think most ex soviet states were awake and have done really well to support Ukraine especially Poland and the baltic states..
👍
Brits have legal excuse as they lost innocent civilians to Novichok poisoning by Russian agents in London.
You are absoluty right, but pls remeber that Germany didnt send any guns in Warzones since 1945, it was a big step with much possibile backlash, because we have a general "leftish-anti war" goverment
Both
❤️
Pz fst3 写真がドイツ国防軍ではなく、我が国日本の陸上自衛隊ですよ。
The picture with that LAW is not the German heer but the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force.
PANZERFAUST 3⚡💪💀🔥⚫⚪ 👍
is God of War
💪
price?????
No it isn`t it is a total developed weapon by the swdish that UK ordered after a competition
Prices, please
Aselsan CATS vs Wescam MX-15 please, electro-optical imaging systems used in UAVs.
nlaw is superior to german rpg because nlaw is fire and forget😀👍🏼
Don't care for an animation of our German allies shooting at an American A.P.C.
Whats this, a book?
*_5.10🇺🇦 Финансовый рай 5.10 Единственный выход нищеты 5.10🇺🇦 Свободная экономика 5.10 Богатые люди 🇺🇦5.10 Свободное перемещение товаров, денег и людей 5.10 Государство вон из экономики 5.10 🇺🇦 Мультивалютность 5.10 Мультиязычность 5.10 Свободное владение и ношение оружия 5.10🇺🇦 НАТО 5.10 Либертарианская идея 5.10 Балашов 5.10🇺🇦_*
cost?
80 thousand american dollars for Javelin, 40,000 for nlaw, and about 2000 per panzerfaust round.
@@kaspar_1982 *200 to 300 per Panzerfaust 3 round.
Ukrainians say NLAW to Russians turists at the drills.
👍🇱🇰🇺🇦
👍
Both great vs Russan Tanks!
💪
NLAW vs Panzerfaust who would lose?
russian tanks
Might get 1 of each please for easter .if i was ukranian 🐇🥚🥚god bless
Panserfauwst is cooler
Maybe the Ukrainians can write in their opinions?!
Hahahah🔎🍁🥅🎼
And what do the Ukrainians say?
Wait
they're not even comparable , the LAW is a far more advanced modern system.... the Germans themselves would not use the Panzerfaust, they'd use a Javalin, it's a cheap thing like an AT4 so you use them sorts of things to save money ... the NLAW serves a tactical niche for british forces being faster to shoot than a jalavin that takes about 6 minutes to warm up
We don't have Javelins in our inventory...
@@theodorkorner1497
But we do have Spike LR ( MELLS ). Not just a fire and forget IIR ( Infrared imagine) system, but also a fire and observe system. Connected via a fiber optic cable, the gunner has the option to use either a fire and forget mode, or to guide the missile thru the picture transmitted from the IIR-sensor in front of the missile.
The Bundeswehr use the Panzerfaust. Look at their official channel on UA-cam.
@@django7377
The Panzerfaust 3 is a RPG style weapon. Spike LR and Javelin are ATGMs.
German army has panzerfaust 3, Milan 2 and TOW...but we need NLAW and Javelin too
better use NLAW + Carl Gustav.
💪💪
NLAW naturaly faaaaar beter against Tanks.... Fire and Forget, guided, tophit, you dont have need skill for it etc. etc.... With that upgraded panzerfaust from WW2 you need very much skill, steel nerves and the chance to fatal hit is still poor if the target is further... NLAW is practicaly one shot one kill ... Panzerfaust can be safe used only on very very very close distances... Panzerfaust has only TWO advantages... PRICE and 5rocket carryed by the solder antitank tandem.... anyway you will probably miss half of them if not super trained in close combat... Just ask your self... what would take you in combat? surely NLAW... gives you sure kill with more safety
The Ukrainians are trained with RPGs, PF3 is a cake for them.
So, UK donate NLAW + Stinger👍👍
Germany donate Panzerfaust 3 +SA7 is 😒😒. Except 500 Stingers, all of them is garage.
Actually the NLAW needs a minimum distance of 20 meters to activate the warhead.
The Panzerfaust 3 can be used at 15 meters. NLAW is excellent for long range or fast moving targets.
Panzerfaust 3 is ma Choice for urban warfare since the point of impact is solely chosen by the soldier and it can be used extremely well for surprise attacks in close range.
Seeing how many countries have recently upgraded they‘r tanks rooftop armour the NLAW will face some problems in the future.
In the end: NLAW for long distance fast targets and Panzerfaust 3 for short range stationary or slow targets.
According to Wiki, Panzerfaust 3 "earlier variants were described as being excessively cumbersome and uncomfortable. Furthermore, the firing mechanism was prone to jamming."
According the donatation of outdated Strela 2, it seems most likely to donate the earlier variants of Panzerfaust 3. Good luck to Ukraine.
@@tailunghung3264 Well it seems to be true that due to bad maintnance 700 out of the 2700 Strela 2 units won`t be delivered. Apparently mold managed to get into the weapon`s explosives. But it is quite certain that the 2000 Strela units will be delivered as thay are in working condition.
Better UK sweden.
One is missile and another one is rocket
@@defencelearning2785 but you chose to compare them