If you’re ever injured in an accident, you can check out Morgan & Morgan. You can start your claim in just a click without having to leave your couch. To start your claim, visit: www.forthepeople.com/JessoftheShire?s=86%3A3523
"The Stand" is Stephen King's attempt at doing LOTR. Randal Flagg is Sauron and Las Vegas is his Mordor. I would love to hear your thoughts. IMAO "The Stand" is 💩.
" I Did Not Pass Through Fire And Death To Bandy Crooked Words With A Witless Worm."...one of the sickest roast ever. Grima never recovered. I liked grumpy Gandalf.
What about the one that he says: "Saruman the White, or should I say Saruman the stupid. Saruman the silly. Saruman the wrinkly. Saruamaaaan the stinky!!!!!"
" I Did Not Pass Through Fire And Death To give 60% of the settlement to Morgan and Morgan.". To be fair, that bridge should have had a safety rail Reply
That's what he says in the movie. In the book he says "The wise speak only of what they know, Gríma son of Gálmód. A witless worm have you become. Therefore be silent, and keep your forked tongue behind your teeth. I have not passed through fire and death to bandy crooked words with a serving-man till the lightning falls".
Many years ago whilst climbing Mount Brandon in the west of Ireland I was passed by an old man with a staff, an interesting hat and a long white beard. His first words to me were "I'm not Gandalf", but I'm not sure he was telling the truth.
"I was talking to myself! A habit of the old: they choose the wisest person present to speak to." I am absolutely saving this for when I'm old and crazy, that's an amazing comeback.
oh, I was just making a parody of the Dumbledore scene in the fourth movie, where he shouts angrily but in the book it states that he says it calmly.@@Laurelin70
lol ya. it was partially a case of the actor not really being familiar with the books and not caring either. I think it worked fine but Dumbledore is honestly an incredibly chill dude so it's actually very out of character. best part about it is all the funny memes.@@Laurelin70
You say Gandalf didn't do anything supernatural to get biblo to give up the ring in the book. But the subtly of "he seemed to grow tall and menacing" might be just from bilbo's perspective. But I think "; his shadow filled the little room." could very well be what we see in the Jackson films. Ever so slightly supernatural is Tolkien's favorite. Understated. This is gonna be like the balrog's wings thing.
There are a lot of moments in the book like this that are about perception, and I do not think are meant to be taken literally. The film, as a visual medium, chooses to depict them literally because it's effective and economical. I've never had a problem with this change, as even though I appreciate the subtlety of the prose the film generally uses these moments well.
I agree. I think her claims of difference are not substantiated. The movie scene here is a valid interpretation of the book scene... supernatural in both. "seemed to grow tall and menacing" is reflected in the movie. .... the difference I would be more interested between book and movie is the depiction of Galadriel when she's tempted with the ring. Hated the movie version; seemed too spectacular. This video's case about Gandalf doesn't hold water with me.
i have always understood this point to be bilbo seeing gandalf as he truly was (because of the ring), much like when frodo sees the true form of glorfindel facing the nine
Book Gandalf should be given the highest honour that Eru can bestow. He put the most awesome spell on the Prancing Pony and it's a crime to be omitted from the movies. He made it serve the best beer in the Shire for seven straight years. That is pure wizardry and utterly selfless. The dude needs a medal and a standing ovation.
Not the best beer in the Shire! The best beer anywhere! May your beer be laid under an enchantment of surpassing excellence for seven years! Plus a gold coin! Gandalf was really happy with the news.
@@5ynthesizerpatel But I'm sure the beer was, if it was that good. Hobbits have a particular fondness for beer of surpassing excellence. Barliman Butterbur likely had to rent out the warehouse space next door to his inn to set up his import / export and logistics department.
It has been decades since I read the books. One of my impressions of Gandalf is that what kept him on mission, in contrast to Saruman, was his deep connection with the people of Middle Earth. Instead of his "love of the halflings' leaf" being a weakness, it was important, in fact a strength. Gandalf was the Grey Wanderer, visiting people all over Middle Earth, getting to know them, going into their homes to enjoy their hospitality, share in basic, simple pleasures like food and drink. He went to parties. Saruman stayed in his tower, studying ring lore, separating himself from the common people. He failed to appreciate the importance of people simply being able to enjoy life. Gandalf understood what Saruman failed to comprehend, why it was so important to defeat Sauron. He got to know the people of Middle Earth, and shared in their values, even the simple ones of hobbits. This is what kept him on mission.
In a sense the Lord of the Rings is a morality play. The Ring embodies the pride and malice of Sauron, and as you go through the story you find strength in the small and humble, and weakness in the vainglorious. God resists the proud, but gives grace to the humble.
If I recall correctly that was Sauron pitfall too. He wasn't initially evil, but his frustration with people's inefficiencies turned him to Morgoth's side.
Gandalf is one of the reasons I find the Lord of the Rings so magical, not in the least because my late father bore such a striking resemblance to Ian McKellen as Gandalf the Grey to the point where he would just stay in the theatre during the break when we were watching the Hobbit together, because during the original trilogy he got so many stares when going to buy popcorn. Watching these movies always makes me feel like a little boy again, almost seeing the face of my father on screen and hearing his deep, McKellen-like voice, being reminded of this intelligent, witty, sometimes grumpy old man who would go through fire for the people and things he loved and believed in.
My absolutely favorite part of the LOTR series is when Gandalf stands before Saruman who is trapped high up in his tower and Saruman tries to split Gandalf away from his allies so they can talk in secret together. Saruman asks Gandalf ,"Will you not come up?" And Gandalf tells Saruman all his plans and schemes have failed and asks him, "Will you not come down?" Saruman is still holding himself above the people he was sent to Middle Earth to defend while Gandalf has humbled himself in comparison by working with and among them and offers Saruman the chance to do the same. "Humility best serves well those who wield (use) it well". Of course Saruman is undone by his own pride, arrogance, and pettiness in the end. Unlike Sauron (who is beyond redemption and must be destroyed) Gandalf offers Saruman a chance to make amends in some way, making it more relatable and hopeful (and tragic) in my opinion.
Honestly, "I have returned to you now, at the turning of the tide " feels less like Gandalf claiming to be the turning of the tide, and more that Gandalf was sent back when he was to bolster the new flow of recently turned tide
He never claims to be the turning of the tide. He couldnt be even if he wanted to be, that wasnt the mission of the Maia. They were there to HELP the peoples of MIddle Earth to turn the tide, not BE the turn. itself.
I never really knew if the tide turning was meant to be a positive or negative statement, I just assumed it meant that the conflict was ramping up, and that whatever balance the opposing sides had was about to topple, one way or another. Sauron and Saruman were about to make their final play, Gandalf and company had to set up their own counterplays immediately and hope Frodo could successfully sneak into the back rank and promote to queen. Uhh, ignore the clunky cliché chess metaphor there.
Remember that you have to read LOTR backwards, because as the book points out, it was written AFTER the events. So as they are writing they KNOW the outcome. So Gandalf saying that is a narrative ploy, not any kind of reflection. You saw how narrowly the ring came to being captured, so things like the 'wind shifting' and things like that are foreshadowing in the book, because everything relied on the ring. Their winning at Gondor meant nothing, they would have been crushed outside barad dur, there is no way Gandalf would have known one way or another.
@@mikearchibald744 Gandalf was the one being in Middle-Earth who would have been quite capable of knowing one way or another, and did. The tide had turned and Gandalf said so plainly, because Eru and Manwe were intervening in the War of the Ring. Eru's first interventive act was to return Gandalf empowered and his divine mandate expanded. Victory was still not assured, but the goal posts had shifted from the free people's achieving victory entirely on their own, but rather managing to fight until the bitter end. Letter 156 lays this out, with secondary reference to Letter 192.
Around the 18th minute, when the discussion turns to the dialogue btw Saruman and Gandalf the White, I have always interpreted that Saruman judges Gandalf based on his own personality. If he wants all power and is willing to die for it, so must be Gandalf, because that is what is natural
There's an expression for that I know in German: 'Was ich selber denk und tu, trau ich auch dem anderen zu.' which I roughly translate as: 'What I myself think and do, I assume others will do too.'
There’s a passage I like near the beginning of the book ROTK - when Gandalf and Pippin meet Denethor, Pippin gets lost in thought suddenly pondering What is Gandalf? How old is he? What’s the deal with Gandalf anyway? And he realizes he’d never even thought of those things before. A first-time reader who hasn’t seen the movies or read the Appendices yet (me at 13) has been wondering these things a lot by this point.
One of the most brilliant things about Tolkien is how he can be so detailed and consistent and at the same time still leave grey areas or make you go look for things and figure them out without spelling it out and beating you over the head. A lesser author would have put an exposition in the first chapter of The Fellowship of the Ring explaining just what the hell Gandalf is. Tolkien is smarter than that. What is never clear to me is just how much Gandalf knows about himself. Does he remember everything he has done going back to the singing of the world into existence? Did he come to Middle Earth fully functional or did he have to rediscover his powers over time? If things go tits up can he get on a boat and go back to Valinor or is he stuck in Middle Earth forever living under Sauron? Just how does this mission work?
I almost wished they didn’t reveal his true Maiar origin. It was cool to wonder what exactly Gandalf was. All we know was that he came from the West and was originally named Oloron, but we didn’t know anything else until the Silmarillion.
@@MrKingYuji that is a great point. As someone who discovered the LOTR long after the publication of the Silmarilian, I have never thought about what it must have been like for readers before that. There is nothing in the appendix that tells you what the heck he is.
@@johnkluge3421 All the wizards are somewhat restricted in power compared to their true Maiar selves, that's pretty clear from the Silmarillion. They weren't meant to 1v1 Sauron, they were supposed to encourage and lead the peoples of Middle Earth in opposing evil. My personal headcanon is that while they were incarnated in their wizardy forms, they didn't remember their true origin, or at the least it was very blurry and unclear, and almost dream-like to them. But once they die, their spirits remember it all as they are supposed to return to the West - I think Gandalf the White is far more aware of who he really is than Gandalf the Grey was, and (in the books) when Saruman dies, his spirit manifests briefly and looks longingly to the west before the wind scatters it which to me indicates that for a moment we glimpsed the actual Curumo.
Gandalf's outburst is essential to make Bilbo (and the audience) understand that the One Ring is unimaginably dangerous. If anything, it's Bilbo who's acting oddly. Gandalf nipped it in the bud.
The author also fails to take into consideration that Mairon (Sauron) was a higher pedigree of Maiar. Literally trained by the greatest of the Valar, Melkor.
@@KurtFrederiksen uh where was Gandalf being hostile. Gandalf was making it clear to bilbo that he feels insulted by his suggestion that Gandalf isn’t his friend but his enemy as Gandalf will always be his friend. Nice job completely missing that.
"Gandalf's outburst is essential to make Bilbo (and the audience) understand that the One Ring is unimaginably dangerous." Unless you're Faramir. Then Tolkien conveniently forgets how dangerous the Ring is. It's just bad writing because Tolkien was a bad writer.
Ian McKellen is just THE Gandalf for me. It is metaphysically impossible that anyone could ever play Gandalf as well as he did. He plays him with humor, charm and tenderness but also wisdom and compassion. And his portrayal also has just the right amount of fire, sternness and intensity to it to communicate his power to the audience and the people around him. Gandalf knows exactly when to be calm, quiet, compassionate and when to be angry, loud and aggressive, and McKellen just plays him exactly right. He really feels like this old, a bit weird and odd friend, who just hangs out with you. But just under the surface you see skill, knowledge, passion and competence unlike anyone else. He could be your best ally if you need him, and your worst nightmare if you wrong him.
Sure, book Gandalf is a bit more calm and sure of himself (if not downright arrogant) at the beginning of the scene outside Moria, but right after the bits you quote, he becomes increasingly angry and shouty, until he ends up hitting the doors with his staff and screaming at them to open in every language he knows, before throwing the staff on the ground. I think that letting him seem a little more frustrated from the start and moving his outburst at Pippin to after he's already tried several ideas, in return for sparing us a scene that, if filmed exactly as written, would have looked like a sudden temper tantrum, is a service to his character.
I love both versions, but I also think the movies could have stayed closer to the books with Gandalf's treatment of Pippin in particular. A lot of the dialogue is the same or very similar, but it's not really until halfway through the third movie we see some tenderness from Gandalf. Most of the rest is played as if he's annoyed at Pippin, while in the book there is a lot more of with the glint in the eye and a bit of a joke that tells us he really cares for all the hobbits.
You forgot to add that when they meet in Fangorn forest that it was Gandalf's laugh that made them realise it was him and not Saruman. A chill went down their spines and Legolas cried Mithrandir. It is the aspect about Gandalf that made me gravitate to him more. And how Pippin noticed on the balcony in Minas Tirith that behind the lines of worry and stress that lying deep within was a fountain of mirth that could send the city into laughter if it was to gush forth... I think Ian McKellen did a good job of portraying that attribute in Gandalf
In The Hobbit Tolkien does poke some fun at Gandalf, when he catches up Bilbo on the adventure with the goblins: "The wizard, to tell the truth, never minded explaining his cleverness more than once" --Out of the Frying-Pan into the Fire So I don't mind Jackson going back to this tone in places.
I'm not sure why UA-cam thought I needed video essays about Tolkien in my life a week ago, but apparently it was right. Uncomfortable thoughts about learning algorithms aside, you're doing awesome work! Thank you!
I love Ian McKellen and that performance was among his best. I was not a fan of how they underpowered him for the scene with the Witch King. I was thrilled with the use of his "Time That Is Given to Us" speech even if they changed the context of it. It really made the movies!
You might be the first content creator I've seen from the Tolkien community that delivers a nuanced and beautifully worded critique of the differences between the films and the book without reverting to either a blind defense of the adaptation or a simplistic rejection of any change from Tolkien's vision. For that alone, you've won me over as a fan. As someone who loved the books as a shining example of what can be done in that medium...and also loved the films as a crowning achieving within THAT medium...it's refreshing to find someone who can understand the inherent limitations and virtues of each. The plain fact is...the written word will always leave more room for nuance, for subtlety, and for depth than film, but that doesn't make film a bad medium to tell this sort of story. Film's strength lies in emotional connection. We are, of course, more than capable of emotionally connecting to characters from a written story, but nothing, and I mean nothing, carries more power than a real person in front of our eyes to connect. As you rightly point out, Jackson's adaptation recognizes this, and his actors do as well. The story has to change a little to accommodate the reality that when we actually SEE Gandalf, we want to love him, and we want him to love us, in a much more visceral way. I have no preference. Gandalf in the text is perfect for the text, and Galdalf in the films is perfect for the films.
I think that movie-Gandalf displayed some of his qualities as described in The Valaquenta: “Wisest of the Maiar was Olórin. He too dwelt in Lórien, but his ways took him often to the house of Nienna, and of her he learned pity and patience. .... But of Olórin that tale [the Quenta Silmarillion] does not speak; for though he loved the Elves, he walked among them unseen, or in form as one of them, and they did not know whence came the fair visions or the promptings of wisdom that he put into their hearts. In later days he was the friend of all the Children of Ilúvatar, and took pity on their sorrows; and those who listened to him awoke from despair and put away the imaginations of darkness.”
It was wise that he was shown as jolly person fond of hobbits , their kindness and humanity. And him using only basic party tricks. He is very wise and enjoys the hobbits company and rejuvination, but he is very wise when needed. Honestly that he is more of a benevolent but a bit trickster, i mean it really works him showing visual he trusts the party, I mean th movies probably did go he did play the fun dude , that is also wise, but revealed with the white shift , that he is a very very powerful authority. As he showes that more. The movie played before thwe white probably up toreally play up how much gandalf is attached and loves the hobbits, humans, and their company. And not steal the partys spotlight. Which also is kinda wise on him?! To make the, oh yeah he was a wise fun dude and now he gets serious white one.
“they did not know whence came the fair visions or the promptings of wisdom that he put into their hearts“- yes, from my perspective this is the role he played during the siege of minas tirith where he and the prince of Dol Amroth went constantly among the soldiers, and wherever they went they lifted their hearts up from despair
You can feel the love behind this video, it's so awesome. There's not many creators like that left on YT, everything has to be "content" now. Listening to someone talk about something they love is such a breath of fresh air.
The dialogue at Orthanc between Saruman and Gandalf would be impossible to stage in its original form. Saruman's primary weapon was his voice. In fact one chapter in T2T is called "The Voice of Saruman." Tolkien writes, "Suddenly another voice spoke, low and melodious, its very sound an enchantment.Those who listened unwarily to that voice could seldom report the words that they heard, and if they did, they wondered, for little power remained in them. Mostly they remembered that it was a delight to hear the voice speaking, all that it said seemed wise and reasonable, and desire awoke in them by swift agreement to seem wise themselves...For some the spell lasted only while the voice spoke to them, and when it spoke to another they smiled, as men do who see through a juggler's trick while others gape at it...But none were unmoved; none rejected its pleas and its commands without an effort of mind and will, so long as its master had control of it." Christopher Lee gives it his best shot, but it's a pale imitation of the original.
Christopher Lee has one of the most famous voices in film history. He lacks Saruman's actual magical ability but using Lee was an inspired choice there.
it can be done... why not? you just need to alter a little the voice to give a supernatural effect, using some very good voice actor, and make some charachters enforce the effect by looking charmed or even making statement on how beutyfull is the voice.
He tries it on Theoden there but only with knowledge of the books you know it's meant to be a supernatural abiltiy as Theoden passes his saving check. I mean they could've done it not so subtle like with Galadriel's banshee impression SFX so I'm glad they kept it subtle there.
But Gandalf does do something supernatural in the confrontation with Bilbo, as it says "He seemed to grow tall and menacing; his shadow filled the little room." That's not a description of someone simply looming over you. I thought the movie captured that moment pretty accurately as per the text.
You could absolutely read it as a description of how Bilbo felt it. I felt similarly when I was a kid being an annoying little twerp to dad and he finally stood up. My dad's a fantastic man and has never laid a hand on any of his kids, but the presence is definitely there when someone bigger and stronger than you puts their foot down. Or you could be a lot more literal with what's in the text and just say the step he took lead him in front of the fireplace, literally extending his shadow across the whole room. That's part of what's so great about Tolkien, for all his descriptive language, he left a lot of room to take in the story the way you want to.
@@plebisMaximusmaybe, but bilbo is an old man. And has known Gandalf for like 70+ years and gone on his own adventure, he isn’t immature nor is he afraid of Gandalf
@@oldylad Compared to Gandalf, Bilbo is an infant. Very young and very, very weak. As for his maturity, it hardly matters, he wasn't thinking clearly in that scene with the ring clouding his mind.
i discovered your channel this week and i think ive binged almost half of your entire catalogue already 😅 this is the exact channel i’ve been looking for. we need more girlies making cozy lotr content!!
Book Gandalf did not return because the tide had turned. He says they meet AT the turning of the tides - he and Aragorn (the two main character heroes) have progressed to the point together. Gandalf is elucidating the point that the turning of the tide could only occur through the collaboration of all good forces on Middle-Earth
In the Silmarilian, every time that the Valar got involved directly in trying to solve middle-earths problems, cataclysmic, continental destruction followed. (Like trying to fine-tune a race car with a sledgehammer.) Sending the wizards to resist Sauron in the 3rd age was the Valar finally realizing how fragile middle earth was. "Did I do that?" In Eurkle voice.
What about the fact that Gandolf's shadow fills the room in the book. There is definitely a reading where Gandolf is a bit more agressive than you make him out to be.
I've been bingeing these lore videos for the past two or three days. They're so nostalgic! Your delight in the series shines through so much. My father used to fill me in on the deep LOTR lore over dinner, but I've never actually read the books myself. Unfortunately, I think I'm attached to hearing the lore spoken aloud, all scattered and out of order, with some opinionated tangents. I'm afraid if I finally read the series, I'll be demystified a bit. Regardless, you storytelling is magical! Thank you so much for these videos and for brightening up my week 🌟
It's easier to convey power through dialog in prose than in film or plays. "Show, don't tell" leaves us with a fickle seeming, quick to irritation, if not anger, wizard as seen in the movies...especially with the limited time allowed by the medium.
Glad I got this video recommended to me. I am not a LOTR megafan but listening to people dissect interesting characters always brings a smile to my face. Helps transport my mind into a whole different, nicer world. Thanks!
I see Olorin as a Legendarium equivalent of a Muse. Sometimes invisible, sometimes speaking in dreams, sometimes that cool elf that you are sure you've met before, Olorin inspires, encourages, and tries to re-frame darker impulsed to the positive. Counseling the elves to consider not only if they could, but also if they should. Perhaps he was a quiet (unsuccessful) voice of reason among the hot-headed Feanorians. My favorite Gandalf retort is in response to Denethor's rant about being the Steward of Gondor and so the realm of Gondor comes first and he doesn't want to be the tool of someone else however worthy that someone might be. Gandalf responds that his realm is Middle Earth itself and that if anything that can bear fruit or flower survives then he will have not wholly failed in his task, "For, I also am a steward. Did you not know?" (II always read this in the Denzel, "Didn't you get the memo," voice) He then drops the mike and bounces with Pippin. The unspoken point, for me, is that all stewards are the tools of someone else's purpose, whether that be Earnur, last King of Gondor, Aragorn, the future King of Gondor, or Manwe, High King of Arda and Lord of the West.
I'm a lawyer trying to relax. The last video I clicked on had an attorney on for an interview. This one is sponsored by a law firm! WTF? I can't get a break!
One of the most fascinating subcultures - the sponsorblock community. Through knowledge of increased engagement by improved collaboration, they act in a positive, community-focused manner, to better their group, neighbours, and themselves simultaneously.
In terms of the Movies, I always say Two Towers is my favorite simply because it really is Gandalf's movie to shine. He is my favorite character in both the books and the movies by far (and that is saying a lot). One difference I always think about when I watch it is in the movies when he says "I strayed out of thought and time..." They omit the line following from the book that states "and I wandered far roads that I will not tell". It seems that would have been perfect in the movie to fit into the "You speak in riddles" line.
It is my favorite of the three books. My big complaint about the movie is that they cut the Voice of Sauroman chapter. I can't believe they did that. Not only is that one of the best chapters of the entire trilogy, it is made for TV entertainment. Who doesn't want to see Gandolf snap Sauroman's staff and kick him out of the order? It is such a satisfying conclusion to things. What were they thinking cutting it out?
@@williamblack6912 Yeah, I think they had to sort of rework the dynamic of Saruman and Gandalf due to some minor changes and the timespan. I'd have to crack open my book again but if I recall, Saruman in the books doesn't discover Gandalf upgraded in the same way he does in the movies. Chiefly, saving Théoden.
@@irife2771 In the books Sauroman is not implicated in the saving Theoden scene the way he is in the movies. It is not clear if Sauroman knows that Gandolf has returned more powerful when Gandolf confronts him at the Tower of Orthanc. Sauroman clearly thinks he can use the power of his voice to talk his way out of things. He tries to make friends with Gandolf in this grossly obsequeous way talking about their coming alliance against Sauron. As I remember, he is legitimately shocked when Gandolf breaks his staff and banishes him from the order of the Astari. So, I don't think he fully understands how powerful Gandolf Mark II really is until that moment.
I never really got the idea of Gandalf being the source of the “turning of the tide” when he said those lines. To me, it was more of the tide has turned and Gandalf is just right on time for it. Anyway, great video!
I won't compare which is better: book or film. But I will say that film making as an art is primarily a visual medium. You can't have unemotional characters. They have to get angry. They have to get scared. They have to be unsure sometimes. They have to be sad and joyous sometimes.
Another exceptional video. My biggest gripe about the movies is that Jackson left iconic scenes out of the movies because of time constraints, yet invented fillers tyat didn’t really honour the canon. Your example is classic. One that I really loathe is Merry’s relationship with Theoden, was indeed a father/son dynamic. Not having the death scene on the Pelennor field broke my heart and left me cold. Loving your work. Tyank you so much.
I dig the points you made here, but I think you missed two important scenes. The first, when Gandalf is imprisoned by Saruman in the book, there is no confrontation. Saruman shows his vast army of orcs and Gandalf realized he would never get out alive. You could say the confrontation was necessary action in the movie, sure, but there's no fear shown by Gandalf like the movie. Same for the second scene: Gandalf vs. the Witch King in Gondor. In the book, Gandalf stands defiantly at the gate and tells the Witch King he will not pass. They have a tough parley and then the Witch King hears the crow's call and the horns of Rohan, and takes off. He had his chance to confront Gandalf and he blinked. Gandalf again shows no fear. The movie of course is far different, and the Gandalf there is shown fearful and overwhelmed and the Witch-King easily breaks his staff before flying off. This is significantly different, and for the worse, if you ask me. I suppose Jackson needed to balance out the characters or that the power dynamics demanded evil to be stronger for the screen, but the Gandalf I see in the book does not show this kind of fear ever. As he says at Fangorn: 'Dangerous!' cried Gandalf. 'And so am I, very dangerous: more dangerous than anything you will ever meet, unless you are brought alive before the seat of the Dark Lord."
This channel is so creative and of such high quality. It's somewhat daunting thinking that it's possible for humans to get this good and become well read enough to produce things like this.
For me THE worst scene with Gandalf was his stand of with the Witch King on the walls of the White City. Where in book he was "come at me bro!" in Movie he just folded like a tissue paper and was saved by the bell. Oh I hate this scene so much. But Gandalf gets off easily compared to Frodo. They Destroyed Frodo's character in the movies taking away every moment where he was smart, brave of wise leaving a whiny pathetic shell of a person. It makes my blood boil watching what they had done to him as he was my favorite character when I was a child.
While I see how an old man’s threat of indecent exposure might not have seemed so dramatic on screen, when you consider his intimidating stance and the characters relative heights it really is quite menacing
Gandalf's return was prompted by the Valar, and that in itself is part of (or at least a sign of) the tide turning. The Valar have not forsaken Middle-earth.
I love when Gandalf explains Saruman of many colors. He appears to be wearing white but his robe is woven of my different hues. The scene my mind created reading this was so incredible
It was probably to have him not take from the party while being a guide. And the humanity and chill gandalf hanging out, is pretty integral to like him later when he is dropping that for the most part, but its clear he is both. Enjoying and wanting the grounded and easiness of hobbits and trust and being chill and fun loving, but carrying the responsibility that he cant ignore that he cant.. The movies had to give the former part too. It might be too to highlight that in frodo to mirror the same different in gandalf? And having him being more emotional close helps, it shows and sells also his trust in people, especially hobbits, showing closeness around them, and for that him showing emotions, really helps too
I like to see the books and the movies almost as "one" - the things we see in the films are very much a lot of what happens in the books, and knowing what I know of the books and the larger story, it's nice knowing that things unseen in the movies will have still happened regardless maybe in a slightly different order or different way... I really find it hilarious how Gandalf kind of has the "I'm sick of this shit" when it comes to certain things, I feel that the shouting at Bilbo we see on screen is the outcome of a longer back and forth between the two and Gandalf is just "okay I've had enough of arguing" - same with Pippin, he's consistently grinding his (Gandalf) gears even more so in Two Towers when he sees Pippin and Merry smoking and eating muttering "hobbits" to himself Just some thoughts is all! Thanks for the video Jess, you earned a new sub!
Ian McKellan’s Gandalf is one of the all time great movie characters (especially in FOTR). Dunno who PJ had him murder Denethor by using Shadowfax to hoof him onto a flaming pyre in Return of the King tho lol
11:14 “I think - tide turning - see, as I remember - I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of - it’s easy to see a tide turn - did I say those words?” - Jess, probably
McKellen infused the character with humanity, even though he's a spirit being. His interaction with the hobbits made him beloved by the audience and his fall into the abyss was soul crushing. Crazy to think that McKellen wasn't Jackson's first pick to play Gandalf.
I find that Norse view of courage interesting. In Swedish defence doctrine, this is still true. Swedes are still taught that in the case of an invasion "all information to the effect that resistance is to cease is false." Which is of course mostly a pragmatic strategy to show our enemy that it'd be really hard to completely destroy Sweden's defences, but I wonder still if it's a remnant of this old ideal of courage.
I disagree with a number of your points based on my very very recent reading of The Hobbit. First off the scene in Bilbo's home, book Bilbo knows very well first hand how powerful Gandalf's magic is, witnessing him saving them from the Goblin King and lighting the entire forest aflame when they are pursued by Wargs. Gandalf in the books is a grumpy old git too (quite "testy" indeed, Tolkien...)with just as short a fuse, he gets annoyed by almost everyone at some point and you also leave out key parts of the movie scenes when discussing them (Pippin in fact callously comments earlier that "nothing's happening" when Gandalf fails to open the door, plus that just a few days ago he told Gimli he would not go through Moria unless he had no other choice) and breeze over important bits of dialogue in the books. Such as the fact that Boromir's question is answered with the rhetorical question "have you lost your wits?". The translation of that subtext is that Gandalf is annoyed and insulting Boromir, implying very directly he's being a stupid jackass. It is also a stretch to interpret Gandalf's wording of tides turning in the movies as himself turning the tide, since he says "I come back to you now at the turn of the tide.". If I applied that grammar to another sentence "I arrived at the start of the party" you would interpret that as me coming to the party as it starts, not that I started the party... The wording is different, the sentiment and subtext is exactly the same. You need to be careful with this sort of nitpicking because you could equally (wrongly) respond to Gandalf retourting Aragorn's playful light-hearted mild teasing with "Oh I'm sorry, I guess I always just talk to myself, you know, the smartest person around?", like "wow dude, arrogant much? you couldn't just chuckle it off with your old friend, you had to out of nowhere bring up your intelligence and imply Aragorn thinks you speak in riddles because he's too dumb to understand you? Insecure much?". Obviously that would be nonsense, but it's dangerously close to where some of these interpretations are at... I won't go into the rest in specific detail, because much of it has to do with Gandalf's role as a Maiar, which would have been a bad decision for the movies to get into in any detail, it's too deep a rabbit hole of lore and so in the context of the films, everything he does is consistent with being a beacon of hope sent by the Valar, but also a powerful ally. The idea that the Istari were not to be "relied upon" is a statement more about the people of Middle Earth having to chip in as well, but the Istari still did TONS to help by sheer magical force and it's pretty clear that without them, Middle Earth would have fallen to Sauron in both the second and third age. If that's not "relying upon the Istari", nothing short of the Istari winning the wars single-handedly (which they weren't powerful enough to do) would count as "relying upon them". Ultimately I don't think it's fair to say that book Gandalf is more nuanced, because it relies on not just prior characterization from The Hobbit (he wrote that first of course), but also that unlike the films, which were to stand by themselves as a trilogy and work on their own merits, Tolkien's legendarium was far greater, with appendixes and whole other books of unfinished tales to flesh out the broader context around who Gandalf is. Plus I disagree with some of your comparisons in dialogue.
I’m new here and so glad the algorithm put you in my path. Wonderful content and analysis. So cozy. I like watching while I knit and crochet stuff for my shop.
A worthy addition to your Book vs Movie series. I think Jackson made a good decision in humaniizing Galdalf, though sometimes it is played a bit too heavy-handed. As the archetypal "wizard," book-Gandalf may have appeared to the uninitiated as playing too closely to well-worn stereotypes (and even derivative), a caricature even, despite the fact that these stereotypes were in fact established by the character himself.
Always a good point - when modern readers mistake Tolkien’s world and characters for stereotypes and tropes, they fail to recognize these as the mold from which all the high fantasy types are cast.
At around 8:00 you take Peter Jackson & Co. to task for implying that Gandalf could lose his cool when his initial attempts to find the password fail. In fact, in the book, after his unsuccessful attempt, Tolkien continues, "Many times he repeated these words in different order, or varied them...Again Gandalf approached the wall, and lifting up his arms he spoke in tones of command and rising wrath. *Edro, edro!* he cried, and struck the rock with his staff. *Open, open!* he shouted...Then he threw his staff on the ground, and sat down in silence." It's pretty clear that Gandalf had lost his cool. In his defense, in the book it was Gandalf, not Frodo, who eventually solved the riddle of the password.
I always took the scene of gandalf growing tall, makingbthe room creak and darkening it to be a perfect adaptation of him growing tall and his shadow filling the room
I was fond of the films when they came out, but over the years since, I've come to see them as very Hollywood and over the top. Even self-indulgent at times. I still like them but not as much as I used to.
2:42 That passage says the Gandalf seemed to grow “tall and menacing” and the “his shadow filled the room”. Are these magical effects? It doesn’t say they are, then neither does the movie.
This is cliche but the ‘you shall not pass’ line from the FOTR movie is goated and still gives me chills every time 23 years later. It’s iconic for a good reason.
I think Gandolf gets slandered as badly as anyone by the movies. In the book Gandolf's job is to be positive and inspire people to keep up hope even when it seems all is lost. In the movie, Gandolf is damn near defeatist. Just to give two of the best examples of this. In the books, Gandolf supports Rohan's stand at Helm's deep and rallies support for it. In the movies, Gandolf calls Helms deep a ditch with no way out and thinks the decision to retreat there will doom Rohan. In the books, Gandolf is the one who comes up with the idea of making a show march to the Black Gates in hopes of distracting Sauron and allowing Frodo and Sam to reach Mount Doom. In the movies, Gandolf thinks all is lost and it is Aragorn who comes up with the idea. Beyond that Gandolf is shown to be much weaker than he actually was in the movies. In the movies, the Witch King practically brushes him aside at the gates of Minas Tirith. In the books, Gandolf stairs the Witch King Down and is about to go full Balrog on his @ss before the Witch King retreats upon hearing the ride of the Roharan. Gandolf is a Maiar for God's sake. He is not going to be slapped around by some undead human who fell under the control of Sauron and once had a ring of power. I hate the way the movies handled that. Of all the main characters in the LOTR, I think the movies do the worst job at portraying Gandolf. They miss it not just in detail but in spirit.
@@vdoggydogg3922 No they are not but I can see why they were portrayed that way and how it worked in the movie. I really don't see why they made the changes they did to Gandolf. I don't think it helped the movies in any way.
@johnkluge3421 I would refer to the actor in this case. He seemed to care about his portrayal quite a bit and we got a great performance. It could have been Sean Connery, that would have ruined the movie.
@@vdoggydogg3922 I think Connery would have been okay. Richard Harris would have been great. It is hard to imagine anyone else playing the roll but that is because he was so good in it. If we had never seen it, other actors would have seemed fine although not as good as what we got.
I am fine with the more human Gandalf. But you are definitely right about the Witch King. I always wondered how the hell he's supposed to be stronger than Gandalf.
My 2 biggest problems between the book and movie Gandalf. #1 When Gandalf physically strikes Denethor like a child and said "Steward" showing a lack of respect. The book Gandalf would have never done such a thing and he had deep respect for the Lineage of the Stewards of Gondor. #2 When Gandalf was face to face with the Witch King in the extended cut and showed fear and terror. How lame. The Book Gandalf didn't show fear at all, he stood fast and was ready for whatever the Witch King would throw at him. Of course that clash was cut short by the horned arrival of the Rohirrim, and will be forever left to the Fanfic community to ponder what such a clash would have looked like....
Thank you for acknowledging the Balrog in the Room… that the movie removed almost all of the Nobility of the characters and instead made them only Heroic (not a bad thing, but not how they were written)… Elrond became petty and spiteful, Theodan became just a lesser son of greater sires, Denetheor merely a “My Way or the Highway” dad figure and Gandalf just a very powerful and old wandering conjuror… I enjoyed the movies and maybe modern audiences would have mistaken true nobility of character as an unbelievable characteristic (sense we see little of it in the world nowadays), but I missed it in the movies.
Wrong, only his old Hobbit friends didn't KNOW how powerful he really was. Strider/Aragorn, Elrond, Galadriel ,etc...ALL KNOW he is wearing a Ring of Power!
Gandalf's battle with The Balrog and his falling from the bridge was one of a very few times that tears were brought to my eyes by something I'd read in a story. The first time I read it, anyway. The endings of The Grapes of Wrath and Lolita choked me up a bit, too, but I wasn't 8 or 9 when I got around to reading those.
“The rule of no realm is mine, neither of Gondor nor any other, great or small. But all worthy things that are in peril as the world now stands, those are my care. And for my part, I shall not wholly fail of my task, though Gondor should perish, if anything passes through this night that can still grow fair or bear fruit and flower again in days to come. For I also am a steward. Did you not know?” Gandalf to Denethor
I haven't read the books in a long time, but I've been rewatching the movies recently, and I'm pretty sure at least in the movies, Gandalf is my favorite character
I never saw Saruman as actually accusing Gandalf to want power in the movies. I always saw it as he figured Gandalf was overstepping his station, who he was, his place in the council and ranking wizards, etc. I also enjoyed that he fought the battles with them. He was powerful but they couldn't rely on him entirely.
I think one of the things I most miss in the books are the times where Gandalf is overcome with grief. Like when Frodo volunteers at the council of Elrond the film version is shown saddened once his last hope that Frodo could be rid of the role of ringbearer finally vanishes and you see his guilt that his choices led to such a cruel fate. You don't see a lot of Gandalf doubting his choices, showing regret or consoling those facing death. Those are the changes I most enjoyed in the films. It's what really sells that although he is this divine being he shows great empathy and admiration for mortals.
Sick impression :) Really enjoyed this video. I feel like both versions fit the mediums they're in, honestly. A more inhuman angelic figure might have not been enough to connect to, since while the endgame of the plot is always a focus in a movie, what's just as important is that the preceding journey is just as enjoyable. Especially given his early fate in Fellowship and how hard it had to hit the audience- It's better to make that character more of a human you can mourn for. If it hadn't felt like an old friend it would have taken away from what made him so beloved in the films.
If you’re ever injured in an accident, you can check out Morgan & Morgan. You can start your claim in just a click without having to leave your couch. To start your claim, visit: www.forthepeople.com/JessoftheShire?s=86%3A3523
I forget if I have suggested it to you yet, Pick of Pooks Hill by Rudyard Kipling.
"The Stand" is Stephen King's attempt at doing LOTR. Randal Flagg is Sauron and Las Vegas is his Mordor. I would love to hear your thoughts. IMAO "The Stand" is 💩.
better than Morgoth and Morgoth!
@@dustinneely Stephen writing fan fiction
Can Morgan&Morgan provide assistance for injuries caused by facing Durin's Bane?
" I Did Not Pass Through Fire And Death To Bandy Crooked Words With A Witless Worm."...one of the sickest roast ever. Grima never recovered. I liked grumpy Gandalf.
What about the one that he says: "Saruman the White, or should I say Saruman the stupid. Saruman the silly. Saruman the wrinkly. Saruamaaaan the stinky!!!!!"
@@gffg387 I dont know how the hell i missed that in my 3 read throughs and 2 times of listening to the audio books
" I Did Not Pass Through Fire And Death To give 60% of the settlement to Morgan and Morgan.".
To be fair, that bridge should have had a safety rail
Reply
I dare anyone to write a better line than Tolkien did.... go ahead, I'll just be here awaiting your response.
That's what he says in the movie. In the book he says "The wise speak only of what they know, Gríma son of Gálmód. A witless worm have you become. Therefore be silent, and keep your forked tongue behind your teeth. I have not passed through fire and death to bandy crooked words with a serving-man till the lightning falls".
Many years ago whilst climbing Mount Brandon in the west of Ireland I was passed by an old man with a staff, an interesting hat and a long white beard. His first words to me were "I'm not Gandalf", but I'm not sure he was telling the truth.
Sounds an awful lot like something Gandalf would say.
Did you see if he had his left eye? You meet Odin in the strangest places these days.
Mount Brandon is my nickname for The Stormlight Archive.
Yup Odin really likes mountain/forest walks for some reason i mean nature is nice and all but i don't get much appeal@@magicaltour1
Typical Gandalf!
"I was talking to myself! A habit of the old: they choose the wisest person present to speak to."
I am absolutely saving this for when I'm old and crazy, that's an amazing comeback.
Saving it? I've _used_ it!
doubt you can be wise if you focus on what look like an "amazing comeback" when read a book, pheraps i am wrong, but...
@@dagan8659 you are wrong, yes.
When someone ask me why I talk to myself I allways say jokingly that is because I want an intelligent and/or interesting conversation hahaha.
Up there with: "talking to yourself?", "Yes, it's the only way I can be assured of intelligent conversation".
"Knock on the doors with your head." Gandalf said *calmly*.
In the book it doesn't say "calmly". And I always read those words with a very distinctive hint of annoyance in the tone.
oh, I was just making a parody of the Dumbledore scene in the fourth movie, where he shouts angrily but in the book it states that he says it calmly.@@Laurelin70
Did you put your name in the goblet of fire? 😂
@@nosrin1988 Sorry, never read any Harry Potter book, so I didn't understand the reference.
lol ya. it was partially a case of the actor not really being familiar with the books and not caring either. I think it worked fine but Dumbledore is honestly an incredibly chill dude so it's actually very out of character.
best part about it is all the funny memes.@@Laurelin70
You say Gandalf didn't do anything supernatural to get biblo to give up the ring in the book. But the subtly of "he seemed to grow tall and menacing" might be just from bilbo's perspective. But I think "; his shadow filled the little room." could very well be what we see in the Jackson films.
Ever so slightly supernatural is Tolkien's favorite. Understated.
This is gonna be like the balrog's wings thing.
Agreed. Book Gandalf (bookdalf?) is certainly doing a thing. Its a cool seen in the film either way.
There are a lot of moments in the book like this that are about perception, and I do not think are meant to be taken literally. The film, as a visual medium, chooses to depict them literally because it's effective and economical.
I've never had a problem with this change, as even though I appreciate the subtlety of the prose the film generally uses these moments well.
I agree. I think her claims of difference are not substantiated. The movie scene here is a valid interpretation of the book scene... supernatural in both. "seemed to grow tall and menacing" is reflected in the movie. .... the difference I would be more interested between book and movie is the depiction of Galadriel when she's tempted with the ring. Hated the movie version; seemed too spectacular. This video's case about Gandalf doesn't hold water with me.
Agreed. This chick is dumb and acts as though she is a good singer
i have always understood this point to be bilbo seeing gandalf as he truly was (because of the ring), much like when frodo sees the true form of glorfindel facing the nine
Book Gandalf should be given the highest honour that Eru can bestow. He put the most awesome spell on the Prancing Pony and it's a crime to be omitted from the movies.
He made it serve the best beer in the Shire for seven straight years. That is pure wizardry and utterly selfless. The dude needs a medal and a standing ovation.
Not the best beer in the Shire! The best beer anywhere!
May your beer be laid under an enchantment of surpassing excellence for seven years!
Plus a gold coin! Gandalf was really happy with the news.
The Prancing Pony isn't in The Shire
@@5ynthesizerpatel But I'm sure the beer was, if it was that good. Hobbits have a particular fondness for beer of surpassing excellence. Barliman Butterbur likely had to rent out the warehouse space next door to his inn to set up his import / export and logistics department.
Bree is not in the shire. it is just past it's borders.
And a gold piece besides!
It has been decades since I read the books. One of my impressions of Gandalf is that what kept him on mission, in contrast to Saruman, was his deep connection with the people of Middle Earth. Instead of his "love of the halflings' leaf" being a weakness, it was important, in fact a strength. Gandalf was the Grey Wanderer, visiting people all over Middle Earth, getting to know them, going into their homes to enjoy their hospitality, share in basic, simple pleasures like food and drink. He went to parties.
Saruman stayed in his tower, studying ring lore, separating himself from the common people. He failed to appreciate the importance of people simply being able to enjoy life.
Gandalf understood what Saruman failed to comprehend, why it was so important to defeat Sauron. He got to know the people of Middle Earth, and shared in their values, even the simple ones of hobbits. This is what kept him on mission.
In a sense the Lord of the Rings is a morality play.
The Ring embodies the pride and malice of Sauron, and as you go through the story you find strength in the small and humble, and weakness in the vainglorious.
God resists the proud, but gives grace to the humble.
If I recall correctly that was Sauron pitfall too.
He wasn't initially evil, but his frustration with people's inefficiencies turned him to Morgoth's side.
Gandalf is one of the reasons I find the Lord of the Rings so magical, not in the least because my late father bore such a striking resemblance to Ian McKellen as Gandalf the Grey to the point where he would just stay in the theatre during the break when we were watching the Hobbit together, because during the original trilogy he got so many stares when going to buy popcorn.
Watching these movies always makes me feel like a little boy again, almost seeing the face of my father on screen and hearing his deep, McKellen-like voice, being reminded of this intelligent, witty, sometimes grumpy old man who would go through fire for the people and things he loved and believed in.
I’ll have a drink to your father tonight, he sounds like he was a good man.
My absolutely favorite part of the LOTR series is when Gandalf stands before Saruman who is trapped high up in his tower and Saruman tries to split Gandalf away from his allies so they can talk in secret together. Saruman asks Gandalf ,"Will you not come up?" And Gandalf tells Saruman all his plans and schemes have failed and asks him, "Will you not come down?" Saruman is still holding himself above the people he was sent to Middle Earth to defend while Gandalf has humbled himself in comparison by working with and among them and offers Saruman the chance to do the same. "Humility best serves well those who wield (use) it well". Of course Saruman is undone by his own pride, arrogance, and pettiness in the end. Unlike Sauron (who is beyond redemption and must be destroyed) Gandalf offers Saruman a chance to make amends in some way, making it more relatable and hopeful (and tragic) in my opinion.
This indicates that saruman and gandalf were contemporaries and gandalf had the highest respect for him
Honestly, "I have returned to you now, at the turning of the tide " feels less like Gandalf claiming to be the turning of the tide, and more that Gandalf was sent back when he was to bolster the new flow of recently turned tide
Exactly my thoughts aswell, he has been swept in with the turning of the tide to help, not actually there to turn it
He never claims to be the turning of the tide. He couldnt be even if he wanted to be, that wasnt the mission of the Maia. They were there to HELP the peoples of MIddle Earth to turn the tide, not BE the turn. itself.
I never really knew if the tide turning was meant to be a positive or negative statement, I just assumed it meant that the conflict was ramping up, and that whatever balance the opposing sides had was about to topple, one way or another. Sauron and Saruman were about to make their final play, Gandalf and company had to set up their own counterplays immediately and hope Frodo could successfully sneak into the back rank and promote to queen. Uhh, ignore the clunky cliché chess metaphor there.
Remember that you have to read LOTR backwards, because as the book points out, it was written AFTER the events. So as they are writing they KNOW the outcome. So Gandalf saying that is a narrative ploy, not any kind of reflection. You saw how narrowly the ring came to being captured, so things like the 'wind shifting' and things like that are foreshadowing in the book, because everything relied on the ring. Their winning at Gondor meant nothing, they would have been crushed outside barad dur, there is no way Gandalf would have known one way or another.
@@mikearchibald744 Gandalf was the one being in Middle-Earth who would have been quite capable of knowing one way or another, and did. The tide had turned and Gandalf said so plainly, because Eru and Manwe were intervening in the War of the Ring. Eru's first interventive act was to return Gandalf empowered and his divine mandate expanded. Victory was still not assured, but the goal posts had shifted from the free people's achieving victory entirely on their own, but rather managing to fight until the bitter end.
Letter 156 lays this out, with secondary reference to Letter 192.
Around the 18th minute, when the discussion turns to the dialogue btw Saruman and Gandalf the White, I have always interpreted that Saruman judges Gandalf based on his own personality. If he wants all power and is willing to die for it, so must be Gandalf, because that is what is natural
There's an expression for that I know in German: 'Was ich selber denk und tu, trau ich auch dem anderen zu.' which I roughly translate as: 'What I myself think and do, I assume others will do too.'
The corrupt have a tendency to assume everyone else is as corrupt as themselves. It’s how they justify themselves.
Saruman also surely knows that the One ring urges its possessor to use it as well.@@washada
There’s a passage I like near the beginning of the book ROTK - when Gandalf and Pippin meet Denethor, Pippin gets lost in thought suddenly pondering What is Gandalf? How old is he? What’s the deal with Gandalf anyway? And he realizes he’d never even thought of those things before. A first-time reader who hasn’t seen the movies or read the Appendices yet (me at 13) has been wondering these things a lot by this point.
One of the most brilliant things about Tolkien is how he can be so detailed and consistent and at the same time still leave grey areas or make you go look for things and figure them out without spelling it out and beating you over the head. A lesser author would have put an exposition in the first chapter of The Fellowship of the Ring explaining just what the hell Gandalf is. Tolkien is smarter than that.
What is never clear to me is just how much Gandalf knows about himself. Does he remember everything he has done going back to the singing of the world into existence? Did he come to Middle Earth fully functional or did he have to rediscover his powers over time? If things go tits up can he get on a boat and go back to Valinor or is he stuck in Middle Earth forever living under Sauron? Just how does this mission work?
I almost wished they didn’t reveal his true Maiar origin. It was cool to wonder what exactly Gandalf was. All we know was that he came from the West and was originally named Oloron, but we didn’t know anything else until the Silmarillion.
@@MrKingYuji that is a great point. As someone who discovered the LOTR long after the publication of the Silmarilian, I have never thought about what it must have been like for readers before that. There is nothing in the appendix that tells you what the heck he is.
@@johnkluge3421 All the wizards are somewhat restricted in power compared to their true Maiar selves, that's pretty clear from the Silmarillion. They weren't meant to 1v1 Sauron, they were supposed to encourage and lead the peoples of Middle Earth in opposing evil. My personal headcanon is that while they were incarnated in their wizardy forms, they didn't remember their true origin, or at the least it was very blurry and unclear, and almost dream-like to them. But once they die, their spirits remember it all as they are supposed to return to the West - I think Gandalf the White is far more aware of who he really is than Gandalf the Grey was, and (in the books) when Saruman dies, his spirit manifests briefly and looks longingly to the west before the wind scatters it which to me indicates that for a moment we glimpsed the actual Curumo.
How did you feel when the Mouth of Sauron threw them the Mithril coat? I can only imagine the suspense when Frodo's rescue was yet unrevealed!
Gandalf's outburst is essential to make Bilbo (and the audience) understand that the One Ring is unimaginably dangerous.
If anything, it's Bilbo who's acting oddly.
Gandalf nipped it in the bud.
The author also fails to take into consideration that Mairon (Sauron) was a higher pedigree of Maiar. Literally trained by the greatest of the Valar, Melkor.
@@KurtFrederiksen uh where was Gandalf being hostile. Gandalf was making it clear to bilbo that he feels insulted by his suggestion that Gandalf isn’t his friend but his enemy as Gandalf will always be his friend. Nice job completely missing that.
@@wadenutt5722the author wrote that shit much later.
"Gandalf's outburst is essential to make Bilbo (and the audience) understand that the One Ring is unimaginably dangerous."
Unless you're Faramir. Then Tolkien conveniently forgets how dangerous the Ring is. It's just bad writing because Tolkien was a bad writer.
@@wadenutt5722 sauron trained under aule, he was just melkors bitch
Ian McKellen is just THE Gandalf for me. It is metaphysically impossible that anyone could ever play Gandalf as well as he did. He plays him with humor, charm and tenderness but also wisdom and compassion. And his portrayal also has just the right amount of fire, sternness and intensity to it to communicate his power to the audience and the people around him. Gandalf knows exactly when to be calm, quiet, compassionate and when to be angry, loud and aggressive, and McKellen just plays him exactly right.
He really feels like this old, a bit weird and odd friend, who just hangs out with you. But just under the surface you see skill, knowledge, passion and competence unlike anyone else. He could be your best ally if you need him, and your worst nightmare if you wrong him.
Boromir is a child asking if we're there yet on a six hour trip.... that was classic!!!!! Great video as always.
Sure, book Gandalf is a bit more calm and sure of himself (if not downright arrogant) at the beginning of the scene outside Moria, but right after the bits you quote, he becomes increasingly angry and shouty, until he ends up hitting the doors with his staff and screaming at them to open in every language he knows, before throwing the staff on the ground.
I think that letting him seem a little more frustrated from the start and moving his outburst at Pippin to after he's already tried several ideas, in return for sparing us a scene that, if filmed exactly as written, would have looked like a sudden temper tantrum, is a service to his character.
Awesome! I love that in the books, Gandalf’s eyebrows are described as extending out past the brim of his hat! That image has always stuck with me
I love Tolkien's character descriptions. They're so evocative!
I love both versions, but I also think the movies could have stayed closer to the books with Gandalf's treatment of Pippin in particular. A lot of the dialogue is the same or very similar, but it's not really until halfway through the third movie we see some tenderness from Gandalf. Most of the rest is played as if he's annoyed at Pippin, while in the book there is a lot more of with the glint in the eye and a bit of a joke that tells us he really cares for all the hobbits.
You forgot to add that when they meet in Fangorn forest that it was Gandalf's laugh that made them realise it was him and not Saruman. A chill went down their spines and Legolas cried Mithrandir. It is the aspect about Gandalf that made me gravitate to him more. And how Pippin noticed on the balcony in Minas Tirith that behind the lines of worry and stress that lying deep within was a fountain of mirth that could send the city into laughter if it was to gush forth... I think Ian McKellen did a good job of portraying that attribute in Gandalf
In The Hobbit Tolkien does poke some fun at Gandalf, when he catches up Bilbo on the adventure with the goblins:
"The wizard, to tell the truth, never minded explaining his cleverness more than once" --Out of the Frying-Pan into the Fire
So I don't mind Jackson going back to this tone in places.
Nicely done!
Now you're ready for the big leagues: Denethor: Book vs. Movie!
Don't panic!
I'm not sure why UA-cam thought I needed video essays about Tolkien in my life a week ago, but apparently it was right.
Uncomfortable thoughts about learning algorithms aside, you're doing awesome work! Thank you!
If you liked this you might also like "in deep Geek" there's a lotr playlist, which personally I think is well worth listening to.
Welcome to Tolkientube!
I love Ian McKellen and that performance was among his best. I was not a fan of how they underpowered him for the scene with the Witch King. I was thrilled with the use of his "Time That Is Given to Us" speech even if they changed the context of it. It really made the movies!
You might be the first content creator I've seen from the Tolkien community that delivers a nuanced and beautifully worded critique of the differences between the films and the book without reverting to either a blind defense of the adaptation or a simplistic rejection of any change from Tolkien's vision. For that alone, you've won me over as a fan.
As someone who loved the books as a shining example of what can be done in that medium...and also loved the films as a crowning achieving within THAT medium...it's refreshing to find someone who can understand the inherent limitations and virtues of each. The plain fact is...the written word will always leave more room for nuance, for subtlety, and for depth than film, but that doesn't make film a bad medium to tell this sort of story. Film's strength lies in emotional connection. We are, of course, more than capable of emotionally connecting to characters from a written story, but nothing, and I mean nothing, carries more power than a real person in front of our eyes to connect.
As you rightly point out, Jackson's adaptation recognizes this, and his actors do as well. The story has to change a little to accommodate the reality that when we actually SEE Gandalf, we want to love him, and we want him to love us, in a much more visceral way.
I have no preference. Gandalf in the text is perfect for the text, and Galdalf in the films is perfect for the films.
I think that movie-Gandalf displayed some of his qualities as described in The Valaquenta:
“Wisest of the Maiar was Olórin. He too dwelt in Lórien, but his ways took him often to the house of Nienna, and of her he learned pity and patience.
.... But of Olórin that tale [the Quenta Silmarillion] does not speak; for though he loved the Elves, he walked among them unseen, or in form as one of them, and they did not know whence came the fair visions or the promptings of wisdom that he put into their hearts. In later days he was the friend of all the Children of Ilúvatar, and took pity on their sorrows; and those who listened to him awoke from despair and put away the imaginations of darkness.”
It was wise that he was shown as jolly person fond of hobbits , their kindness and humanity. And him using only basic party tricks. He is very wise and enjoys the hobbits company and rejuvination, but he is very wise when needed.
Honestly that he is more of a benevolent but a bit trickster, i mean it really works him showing visual he trusts the party,
I mean th movies probably did go he did play the fun dude , that is also wise, but revealed with the white shift , that he is a very very powerful authority. As he showes that more.
The movie played before thwe white probably up toreally play up how much gandalf is attached and loves the hobbits, humans, and their company. And not steal the partys spotlight. Which also is kinda wise on him?!
To make the, oh yeah he was a wise fun dude and now he gets serious white one.
“they did not know whence came the fair visions or the promptings of wisdom that he put into their hearts“- yes, from my perspective this is the role he played during the siege of minas tirith where he and the prince of Dol Amroth went constantly among the soldiers, and wherever they went they lifted their hearts up from despair
“His shadow filled this little room” seems to have been interpreted by the filmmakers as a real spell, and I love that. It works perfectly.
3:09 - much like the rest of us, Bilbo is terrified at the thought of _naked old men._
Mine isn't the only broken mind thank you! 😭
You can feel the love behind this video, it's so awesome. There's not many creators like that left on YT, everything has to be "content" now. Listening to someone talk about something they love is such a breath of fresh air.
The dialogue at Orthanc between Saruman and Gandalf would be impossible to stage in its original form. Saruman's primary weapon was his voice. In fact one chapter in T2T is called "The Voice of Saruman." Tolkien writes, "Suddenly another voice spoke, low and melodious, its very sound an enchantment.Those who listened unwarily to that voice could seldom report the words that they heard, and if they did, they wondered, for little power remained in them. Mostly they remembered that it was a delight to hear the voice speaking, all that it said seemed wise and reasonable, and desire awoke in them by swift agreement to seem wise themselves...For some the spell lasted only while the voice spoke to them, and when it spoke to another they smiled, as men do who see through a juggler's trick while others gape at it...But none were unmoved; none rejected its pleas and its commands without an effort of mind and will, so long as its master had control of it." Christopher Lee gives it his best shot, but it's a pale imitation of the original.
Christopher Lee has one of the most famous voices in film history. He lacks Saruman's actual magical ability but using Lee was an inspired choice there.
it can be done... why not? you just need to alter a little the voice to give a supernatural effect, using some very good voice actor, and make some charachters enforce the effect by looking charmed or even making statement on how beutyfull is the voice.
He tries it on Theoden there but only with knowledge of the books you know it's meant to be a supernatural abiltiy as Theoden passes his saving check. I mean they could've done it not so subtle like with Galadriel's banshee impression SFX so I'm glad they kept it subtle there.
@@lordofchaosinc.261 In the BBC Radio version, Saruman almost gets away with it. It's possible when you're only using voices and sounds.
But Gandalf does do something supernatural in the confrontation with Bilbo, as it says "He seemed to grow tall and menacing; his shadow filled the little room." That's not a description of someone simply looming over you. I thought the movie captured that moment pretty accurately as per the text.
It could've been a lot more subtle. But I don't think Peter Jackson does subtlety.
You could absolutely read it as a description of how Bilbo felt it. I felt similarly when I was a kid being an annoying little twerp to dad and he finally stood up. My dad's a fantastic man and has never laid a hand on any of his kids, but the presence is definitely there when someone bigger and stronger than you puts their foot down. Or you could be a lot more literal with what's in the text and just say the step he took lead him in front of the fireplace, literally extending his shadow across the whole room. That's part of what's so great about Tolkien, for all his descriptive language, he left a lot of room to take in the story the way you want to.
@@plebisMaximusmaybe, but bilbo is an old man. And has known Gandalf for like 70+ years and gone on his own adventure, he isn’t immature nor is he afraid of Gandalf
@@oldylad Compared to Gandalf, Bilbo is an infant. Very young and very, very weak. As for his maturity, it hardly matters, he wasn't thinking clearly in that scene with the ring clouding his mind.
i discovered your channel this week and i think ive binged almost half of your entire catalogue already 😅
this is the exact channel i’ve been looking for. we need more girlies making cozy lotr content!!
I'm glad you enjoy my videos! It's lovely to have you in the community!
I got an ad immediately after the "Aragorn says: ..." and I'm like "No he didn't!!!!". 😂😂😂
Aragorn says get crispy chicken tenders
The same just happened to me, prit' near identical thought came to mind
Book Gandalf did not return because the tide had turned. He says they meet AT the turning of the tides - he and Aragorn (the two main character heroes) have progressed to the point together. Gandalf is elucidating the point that the turning of the tide could only occur through the collaboration of all good forces on Middle-Earth
"Fighting because it's the right thing to do" - it's as if the man lived through two World Wars.
In the Silmarilian, every time that the Valar got involved directly in trying to solve middle-earths problems, cataclysmic, continental destruction followed. (Like trying to fine-tune a race car with a sledgehammer.) Sending the wizards to resist Sauron in the 3rd age was the Valar finally realizing how fragile middle earth was. "Did I do that?" In Eurkle voice.
What about the fact that Gandolf's shadow fills the room in the book. There is definitely a reading where Gandolf is a bit more agressive than you make him out to be.
I've been bingeing these lore videos for the past two or three days. They're so nostalgic! Your delight in the series shines through so much. My father used to fill me in on the deep LOTR lore over dinner, but I've never actually read the books myself. Unfortunately, I think I'm attached to hearing the lore spoken aloud, all scattered and out of order, with some opinionated tangents. I'm afraid if I finally read the series, I'll be demystified a bit.
Regardless, you storytelling is magical! Thank you so much for these videos and for brightening up my week 🌟
It's easier to convey power through dialog in prose than in film or plays. "Show, don't tell" leaves us with a fickle seeming, quick to irritation, if not anger, wizard as seen in the movies...especially with the limited time allowed by the medium.
That seque to the injury law firm was gold. Congrats on getting a sponsor.
Your highlighting of the pessimism inherent in TLOR was brilliant, thank you
That "you will see gandalf uncloaked" line cracks me up so bad 😂.
God bless you and your work young lady 💜💙💜 respect from Croatia 😇😇😇💙💚💙
Glad I got this video recommended to me. I am not a LOTR megafan but listening to people dissect interesting characters always brings a smile to my face. Helps transport my mind into a whole different, nicer world. Thanks!
I see Olorin as a Legendarium equivalent of a Muse. Sometimes invisible, sometimes speaking in dreams, sometimes that cool elf that you are sure you've met before, Olorin inspires, encourages, and tries to re-frame darker impulsed to the positive. Counseling the elves to consider not only if they could, but also if they should. Perhaps he was a quiet (unsuccessful) voice of reason among the hot-headed Feanorians.
My favorite Gandalf retort is in response to Denethor's rant about being the Steward of Gondor and so the realm of Gondor comes first and he doesn't want to be the tool of someone else however worthy that someone might be. Gandalf responds that his realm is Middle Earth itself and that if anything that can bear fruit or flower survives then he will have not wholly failed in his task, "For, I also am a steward. Did you not know?" (II always read this in the Denzel, "Didn't you get the memo," voice) He then drops the mike and bounces with Pippin. The unspoken point, for me, is that all stewards are the tools of someone else's purpose, whether that be Earnur, last King of Gondor, Aragorn, the future King of Gondor, or Manwe, High King of Arda and Lord of the West.
I'm a lawyer trying to relax. The last video I clicked on had an attorney on for an interview. This one is sponsored by a law firm! WTF? I can't get a break!
One of the most fascinating subcultures - the sponsorblock community. Through knowledge of increased engagement by improved collaboration, they act in a positive, community-focused manner, to better their group, neighbours, and themselves simultaneously.
I think I've sent in maybe 2 timestamps. It's such a big and active community at this point you almost never get to see a sponsor when you have it on.
These video essays are so well done. Thank you!
I'm so glad you enjoy them!
Tim Robinson immediately came to mind before the clip, brilliant.
In terms of the Movies, I always say Two Towers is my favorite simply because it really is Gandalf's movie to shine. He is my favorite character in both the books and the movies by far (and that is saying a lot). One difference I always think about when I watch it is in the movies when he says "I strayed out of thought and time..." They omit the line following from the book that states "and I wandered far roads that I will not tell". It seems that would have been perfect in the movie to fit into the "You speak in riddles" line.
It is my favorite of the three books. My big complaint about the movie is that they cut the Voice of Sauroman chapter. I can't believe they did that. Not only is that one of the best chapters of the entire trilogy, it is made for TV entertainment. Who doesn't want to see Gandolf snap Sauroman's staff and kick him out of the order? It is such a satisfying conclusion to things. What were they thinking cutting it out?
@@johnkluge3421It's in the extended cut....sort of.
@@williamblack6912 Yes but it isn't the whole thing. I guess Christopher Lee was really upset by the failure to include that scene. I don't blame him.
@@williamblack6912 Yeah, I think they had to sort of rework the dynamic of Saruman and Gandalf due to some minor changes and the timespan. I'd have to crack open my book again but if I recall, Saruman in the books doesn't discover Gandalf upgraded in the same way he does in the movies. Chiefly, saving Théoden.
@@irife2771 In the books Sauroman is not implicated in the saving Theoden scene the way he is in the movies. It is not clear if Sauroman knows that Gandolf has returned more powerful when Gandolf confronts him at the Tower of Orthanc. Sauroman clearly thinks he can use the power of his voice to talk his way out of things. He tries to make friends with Gandolf in this grossly obsequeous way talking about their coming alliance against Sauron. As I remember, he is legitimately shocked when Gandolf breaks his staff and banishes him from the order of the Astari. So, I don't think he fully understands how powerful Gandolf Mark II really is until that moment.
Thanks!
"Did you put your name in the goblet," Dumbledore asked calmly.
Excellent essay. Always glad to see someone ready to point out some of the many flaws and shortcomings of these movies.
yo that sponsor read at 1:04 was WILD 😂😂😂
I never really got the idea of Gandalf being the source of the “turning of the tide” when he said those lines. To me, it was more of the tide has turned and Gandalf is just right on time for it. Anyway, great video!
I love the Gandalf nodding to jazz meme.
I won't compare which is better: book or film. But I will say that film making as an art is primarily a visual medium. You can't have unemotional characters. They have to get angry. They have to get scared. They have to be unsure sometimes. They have to be sad and joyous sometimes.
Bonus points for using "avuncular" in a video!👏
Another exceptional video. My biggest gripe about the movies is that Jackson left iconic scenes out of the movies because of time constraints, yet invented fillers tyat didn’t really honour the canon. Your example is classic. One that I really loathe is Merry’s relationship with Theoden, was indeed a father/son dynamic. Not having the death scene on the Pelennor field broke my heart and left me cold.
Loving your work. Tyank you so much.
I dig the points you made here, but I think you missed two important scenes. The first, when Gandalf is imprisoned by Saruman in the book, there is no confrontation. Saruman shows his vast army of orcs and Gandalf realized he would never get out alive. You could say the confrontation was necessary action in the movie, sure, but there's no fear shown by Gandalf like the movie. Same for the second scene: Gandalf vs. the Witch King in Gondor. In the book, Gandalf stands defiantly at the gate and tells the Witch King he will not pass. They have a tough parley and then the Witch King hears the crow's call and the horns of Rohan, and takes off. He had his chance to confront Gandalf and he blinked. Gandalf again shows no fear. The movie of course is far different, and the Gandalf there is shown fearful and overwhelmed and the Witch-King easily breaks his staff before flying off. This is significantly different, and for the worse, if you ask me. I suppose Jackson needed to balance out the characters or that the power dynamics demanded evil to be stronger for the screen, but the Gandalf I see in the book does not show this kind of fear ever. As he says at Fangorn: 'Dangerous!' cried Gandalf. 'And so am I, very dangerous: more dangerous than anything you will ever meet, unless you are brought alive before the seat of the Dark Lord."
This channel is so creative and of such high quality. It's somewhat daunting thinking that it's possible for humans to get this good and become well read enough to produce things like this.
For me THE worst scene with Gandalf was his stand of with the Witch King on the walls of the White City. Where in book he was "come at me bro!" in Movie he just folded like a tissue paper and was saved by the bell. Oh I hate this scene so much.
But Gandalf gets off easily compared to Frodo. They Destroyed Frodo's character in the movies taking away every moment where he was smart, brave of wise leaving a whiny pathetic shell of a person. It makes my blood boil watching what they had done to him as he was my favorite character when I was a child.
While I see how an old man’s threat of indecent exposure might not have seemed so dramatic on screen, when you consider his intimidating stance and the characters relative heights it really is quite menacing
Gandalf's return was prompted by the Valar, and that in itself is part of (or at least a sign of) the tide turning. The Valar have not forsaken Middle-earth.
I love when Gandalf explains Saruman of many colors. He appears to be wearing white but his robe is woven of my different hues. The scene my mind created reading this was so incredible
I saw the pre-fall Gandalf being more "human" as more a way of accentuating the post fall transformation than anything else.
It was probably to have him not take from the party while being a guide.
And the humanity and chill gandalf hanging out, is pretty integral to like him later when he is dropping that for the most part, but its clear he is both.
Enjoying and wanting the grounded and easiness of hobbits and trust and being chill and fun loving, but carrying the responsibility that he cant ignore that he cant.. The movies had to give the former part too. It might be too to highlight that in frodo to mirror the same different in gandalf?
And having him being more emotional close helps, it shows and sells also his trust in people, especially hobbits, showing closeness around them, and for that him showing emotions, really helps too
I like to see the books and the movies almost as "one" - the things we see in the films are very much a lot of what happens in the books, and knowing what I know of the books and the larger story, it's nice knowing that things unseen in the movies will have still happened regardless maybe in a slightly different order or different way...
I really find it hilarious how Gandalf kind of has the "I'm sick of this shit" when it comes to certain things, I feel that the shouting at Bilbo we see on screen is the outcome of a longer back and forth between the two and Gandalf is just "okay I've had enough of arguing" - same with Pippin, he's consistently grinding his (Gandalf) gears even more so in Two Towers when he sees Pippin and Merry smoking and eating muttering "hobbits" to himself
Just some thoughts is all! Thanks for the video Jess, you earned a new sub!
Ian McKellan’s Gandalf is one of the all time great movie characters (especially in FOTR). Dunno who PJ had him murder Denethor by using Shadowfax to hoof him onto a flaming pyre in Return of the King tho lol
I think the films wanted to show a stark contrast between Gandalf the Grey and Gandalf the White hence they made him initially more human.
Enough about Gandalf, I want to know more about the cat on the mug
The cat is named Morris
@@Jess_of_the_Shire GIMME GIMME GIMME!!!
11:14 “I think - tide turning - see, as I remember - I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of - it’s easy to see a tide turn - did I say those words?” - Jess, probably
Nothing like trying to take a Balrog to court 😂
Thank you for highlighting Gandalf's quote at 15:04 about talking aloud. It is one of my top quotes from the books.
McKellen infused the character with humanity, even though he's a spirit being. His interaction with the hobbits made him beloved by the audience and his fall into the abyss was soul crushing. Crazy to think that McKellen wasn't Jackson's first pick to play Gandalf.
I find that Norse view of courage interesting. In Swedish defence doctrine, this is still true. Swedes are still taught that in the case of an invasion "all information to the effect that resistance is to cease is false." Which is of course mostly a pragmatic strategy to show our enemy that it'd be really hard to completely destroy Sweden's defences, but I wonder still if it's a remnant of this old ideal of courage.
I disagree with a number of your points based on my very very recent reading of The Hobbit.
First off the scene in Bilbo's home, book Bilbo knows very well first hand how powerful Gandalf's magic is, witnessing him saving them from the Goblin King and lighting the entire forest aflame when they are pursued by Wargs.
Gandalf in the books is a grumpy old git too (quite "testy" indeed, Tolkien...)with just as short a fuse, he gets annoyed by almost everyone at some point and you also leave out key parts of the movie scenes when discussing them (Pippin in fact callously comments earlier that "nothing's happening" when Gandalf fails to open the door, plus that just a few days ago he told Gimli he would not go through Moria unless he had no other choice) and breeze over important bits of dialogue in the books. Such as the fact that Boromir's question is answered with the rhetorical question "have you lost your wits?". The translation of that subtext is that Gandalf is annoyed and insulting Boromir, implying very directly he's being a stupid jackass.
It is also a stretch to interpret Gandalf's wording of tides turning in the movies as himself turning the tide, since he says "I come back to you now at the turn of the tide.". If I applied that grammar to another sentence "I arrived at the start of the party" you would interpret that as me coming to the party as it starts, not that I started the party... The wording is different, the sentiment and subtext is exactly the same.
You need to be careful with this sort of nitpicking because you could equally (wrongly) respond to Gandalf retourting Aragorn's playful light-hearted mild teasing with "Oh I'm sorry, I guess I always just talk to myself, you know, the smartest person around?", like "wow dude, arrogant much? you couldn't just chuckle it off with your old friend, you had to out of nowhere bring up your intelligence and imply Aragorn thinks you speak in riddles because he's too dumb to understand you? Insecure much?". Obviously that would be nonsense, but it's dangerously close to where some of these interpretations are at...
I won't go into the rest in specific detail, because much of it has to do with Gandalf's role as a Maiar, which would have been a bad decision for the movies to get into in any detail, it's too deep a rabbit hole of lore and so in the context of the films, everything he does is consistent with being a beacon of hope sent by the Valar, but also a powerful ally. The idea that the Istari were not to be "relied upon" is a statement more about the people of Middle Earth having to chip in as well, but the Istari still did TONS to help by sheer magical force and it's pretty clear that without them, Middle Earth would have fallen to Sauron in both the second and third age. If that's not "relying upon the Istari", nothing short of the Istari winning the wars single-handedly (which they weren't powerful enough to do) would count as "relying upon them".
Ultimately I don't think it's fair to say that book Gandalf is more nuanced, because it relies on not just prior characterization from The Hobbit (he wrote that first of course), but also that unlike the films, which were to stand by themselves as a trilogy and work on their own merits, Tolkien's legendarium was far greater, with appendixes and whole other books of unfinished tales to flesh out the broader context around who Gandalf is. Plus I disagree with some of your comparisons in dialogue.
I’m new here and so glad the algorithm put you in my path. Wonderful content and analysis. So cozy. I like watching while I knit and crochet stuff for my shop.
A worthy addition to your Book vs Movie series. I think Jackson made a good decision in humaniizing Galdalf, though sometimes it is played a bit too heavy-handed. As the archetypal "wizard," book-Gandalf may have appeared to the uninitiated as playing too closely to well-worn stereotypes (and even derivative), a caricature even, despite the fact that these stereotypes were in fact established by the character himself.
Always a good point - when modern readers mistake Tolkien’s world and characters for stereotypes and tropes, they fail to recognize these as the mold from which all the high fantasy types are cast.
I tear up a bit when "Gandalf The White" leaves the hobbits at the shire.
At around 8:00 you take Peter Jackson & Co. to task for implying that Gandalf could lose his cool when his initial attempts to find the password fail. In fact, in the book, after his unsuccessful attempt, Tolkien continues, "Many times he repeated these words in different order, or varied them...Again Gandalf approached the wall, and lifting up his arms he spoke in tones of command and rising wrath. *Edro, edro!* he cried, and struck the rock with his staff. *Open, open!* he shouted...Then he threw his staff on the ground, and sat down in silence." It's pretty clear that Gandalf had lost his cool. In his defense, in the book it was Gandalf, not Frodo, who eventually solved the riddle of the password.
If you actually bothered to watch the video before commenting you'd know she addresses this literally a minute later.
I always took the scene of gandalf growing tall, makingbthe room creak and darkening it to be a perfect adaptation of him growing tall and his shadow filling the room
I was fond of the films when they came out, but over the years since, I've come to see them as very Hollywood and over the top. Even self-indulgent at times. I still like them but not as much as I used to.
"DID YOU THROW YOUR NAME INTO THE GOBLET OF FIRE!" Gandalf asked calmly.
2:42 That passage says the Gandalf seemed to grow “tall and menacing” and the “his shadow filled the room”. Are these magical effects? It doesn’t say they are, then neither does the movie.
Book versus Movie Gandolf. I love them both. Could anyone imagine another actor playing Gandolf? He was amazing.
This is cliche but the ‘you shall not pass’ line from the FOTR movie is goated and still gives me chills every time 23 years later. It’s iconic for a good reason.
I think Gandolf gets slandered as badly as anyone by the movies. In the book Gandolf's job is to be positive and inspire people to keep up hope even when it seems all is lost. In the movie, Gandolf is damn near defeatist. Just to give two of the best examples of this. In the books, Gandolf supports Rohan's stand at Helm's deep and rallies support for it. In the movies, Gandolf calls Helms deep a ditch with no way out and thinks the decision to retreat there will doom Rohan. In the books, Gandolf is the one who comes up with the idea of making a show march to the Black Gates in hopes of distracting Sauron and allowing Frodo and Sam to reach Mount Doom. In the movies, Gandolf thinks all is lost and it is Aragorn who comes up with the idea.
Beyond that Gandolf is shown to be much weaker than he actually was in the movies. In the movies, the Witch King practically brushes him aside at the gates of Minas Tirith. In the books, Gandolf stairs the Witch King Down and is about to go full Balrog on his @ss before the Witch King retreats upon hearing the ride of the Roharan. Gandolf is a Maiar for God's sake. He is not going to be slapped around by some undead human who fell under the control of Sauron and once had a ring of power. I hate the way the movies handled that.
Of all the main characters in the LOTR, I think the movies do the worst job at portraying Gandolf. They miss it not just in detail but in spirit.
Merry and Pippin are not portrayed well but I saw what the movies were trying to do and it paid off in the end.
@@vdoggydogg3922 No they are not but I can see why they were portrayed that way and how it worked in the movie. I really don't see why they made the changes they did to Gandolf. I don't think it helped the movies in any way.
@johnkluge3421 I would refer to the actor in this case. He seemed to care about his portrayal quite a bit and we got a great performance. It could have been Sean Connery, that would have ruined the movie.
@@vdoggydogg3922 I think Connery would have been okay. Richard Harris would have been great. It is hard to imagine anyone else playing the roll but that is because he was so good in it. If we had never seen it, other actors would have seemed fine although not as good as what we got.
I am fine with the more human Gandalf. But you are definitely right about the Witch King. I always wondered how the hell he's supposed to be stronger than Gandalf.
Wonderful video. I now need a video ranking Gandalf's insults.
My 2 biggest problems between the book and movie Gandalf. #1 When Gandalf physically strikes Denethor like a child and said "Steward" showing a lack of respect. The book Gandalf would have never done such a thing and he had deep respect for the Lineage of the Stewards of Gondor. #2 When Gandalf was face to face with the Witch King in the extended cut and showed fear and terror. How lame. The Book Gandalf didn't show fear at all, he stood fast and was ready for whatever the Witch King would throw at him. Of course that clash was cut short by the horned arrival of the Rohirrim, and will be forever left to the Fanfic community to ponder what such a clash would have looked like....
Thank you for acknowledging the Balrog in the Room… that the movie removed almost all of the Nobility of the characters and instead made them only Heroic (not a bad thing, but not how they were written)… Elrond became petty and spiteful, Theodan became just a lesser son of greater sires, Denetheor merely a “My Way or the Highway” dad figure and Gandalf just a very powerful and old wandering conjuror… I enjoyed the movies and maybe modern audiences would have mistaken true nobility of character as an unbelievable characteristic (sense we see little of it in the world nowadays), but I missed it in the movies.
Wrong, only his old Hobbit friends didn't KNOW how powerful he really was. Strider/Aragorn, Elrond, Galadriel ,etc...ALL KNOW he is wearing a Ring of Power!
Loved the "I Think You Should Leave" overlay
Loving the character breakdowns between movies/books. Keep em coming!
Gandalf's battle with The Balrog and his falling from the bridge was one of a very few times that tears were brought to my eyes by something I'd read in a story. The first time I read it, anyway. The endings of The Grapes of Wrath and Lolita choked me up a bit, too, but I wasn't 8 or 9 when I got around to reading those.
“The rule of no realm is mine, neither of Gondor nor any other, great or small. But all worthy things that are in peril as the world now stands, those are my care. And for my part, I shall not wholly fail of my task, though Gondor should perish, if anything passes through this night that can still grow fair or bear fruit and flower again in days to come. For I also am a steward. Did you not know?”
Gandalf to Denethor
I haven't read the books in a long time, but I've been rewatching the movies recently, and I'm pretty sure at least in the movies, Gandalf is my favorite character
I never saw Saruman as actually accusing Gandalf to want power in the movies. I always saw it as he figured Gandalf was overstepping his station, who he was, his place in the council and ranking wizards, etc. I also enjoyed that he fought the battles with them. He was powerful but they couldn't rely on him entirely.
I think one of the things I most miss in the books are the times where Gandalf is overcome with grief. Like when Frodo volunteers at the council of Elrond the film version is shown saddened once his last hope that Frodo could be rid of the role of ringbearer finally vanishes and you see his guilt that his choices led to such a cruel fate. You don't see a lot of Gandalf doubting his choices, showing regret or consoling those facing death. Those are the changes I most enjoyed in the films. It's what really sells that although he is this divine being he shows great empathy and admiration for mortals.
I must say you are one of the most entertaining, thoughtful and adorable Tolkien content creators on UA-cam !
Sick impression :)
Really enjoyed this video.
I feel like both versions fit the mediums they're in, honestly. A more inhuman angelic figure might have not been enough to connect to, since while the endgame of the plot is always a focus in a movie, what's just as important is that the preceding journey is just as enjoyable. Especially given his early fate in Fellowship and how hard it had to hit the audience- It's better to make that character more of a human you can mourn for. If it hadn't felt like an old friend it would have taken away from what made him so beloved in the films.