I had a friend with a Pitts S2-B and he took me up a few times. It's just awe-inspiring that those aerobatic planes- the "unlimited class" and their pilots can maintain spatial orientation while flipping all around, and the planes which can take the forces. THEN, we have these.... BILLION DOLLAR jet fighters doing nearly the same thing! I'm so amazed at this. It's like watching an R/C plane flip and turn, but it's a military jet fighter, not just a stunt plane (meaning, a plane that has a mission so far beyond a "circus act")!
Not really. The move had been known for decades before he made it famous at Le Bourget in 1989. It was only named after him because he put it in the minds of the public. The actual credit for the manoeuvre belongs to Swedish pilots who flew the Saab 35 Draken.
@@anjakellenjeter Incorrect answer . Cobra differs from Pugachev's cobra in that the angle is 120 degrees. F22 made the cobra and SU 35 made the Pugachev cobra. Frolov's chakra is not a loop, but a rotation of the fighter around its transverse axis. F 22 made a loop, SU 35 Chakra Frolova
@@ФеликсДзержинский-ф2ш ahh i noticed the slight difference. idk there was another types of cobra movement. learn a lots of thing today. thanks buddy.
I can see the value in such manoeuvres in avoiding a missile but I wonder about them in a dog fight. The best fighter pilots always speak of "energy". Coming out of a Cobra you would have zero energy and therefore be vulnerable to a second attack.
@@billthomas635 if you have zero energy you can't properly avoid a missile, and that doesn't help the fact that the people that use these planes will be fighting those with missiles that lock on before the pilot can see the target In a dogfight this would be great with the incredibly tight turning radius and all, but that probably won't happen often
Depends where you are and what you’re watching. I see American planes at air shows do these same maneuvers. Chicago air and water show for years is one example. And then driving through the state of Nebraska near an Air Force base seen two jets flying around out there back in 2009 doing maneuvers I didn’t even think were possible with a plane. Just happen to be at right place at right time. Pulled over and watched it for half hour. Insane stuff. Too cool. The way they fly is cool, but I really dig the sounds. Nothing like the sound of jets flying around to wake you up. Especially when they are coming right at you and you don’t hear anything but silence until they are damn near past you.
@@talorb633 mate you really still belive in the Ghost of Kiev, everybody assured it's fake come on 😂, and btw even if it was real, the plane they claimed he used was still soviet so yeah
I have seen SU-30 of IAF performing KULBIT IN Chennai Airshow around 2004-5 at Marina Beach. So Spectacular! I have seen cobra,Tail slide etc. But KULBIT IS THE BEST!
@@umaydniassuh6511 it's not due to the lack of professionalism, it's due to the engines that IAF used at that time. BTW talkin' abt Bhikharistani Air Force, forget about the professionalism, your jets cockpit are made of door hinges 😆😆😆👌👌
Yeah CGI.,....what else? Do you believe the Russians would lend an SU57 to Tom Cruise and his Wannebee´s??? The biggest Joke of that Movie...F14 against SU 57.....the Felon would have eaten the Tomcat for Breakfast....
this is a great explanation. 2 or 3 days ago I actually wanted to learn about this topic. You posted at the right moment thanks 😁👍 And I really love maneuvers they are just lovely
The russian su30/ 35 are excellent a2a fighters. However, nothing is comparable the f22/f35 and pretty much all the current in service aircraft with modernised upgrades. Ive had the most fun in russian aircraft though. Obviously only through simulation.
@@JCCOOLDOWN Sorry, but so far F35 / 22 show only uselessness and cut the dough on government orders. I won’t say “but our planes are better in every way”, but I will note that when yours are advertised as another Lamborghini, ours simply work effectively. The new aircraft are comparable, and the old ones are being actively updated to modern standards (the most obvious example of the MiG 31 was the best interceptor (and still is), it also became a reconnaissance aircraft with a bunch of electronics and very serious arguments in armament) (and yes, the MiG seems to want to make a MiG 41, but when it will be and how much it will be a starship is not clear) By the way, I note that relatively recently the United States also wanted to adjust old fighters to modern standards, instead of completely replacing them with the 5th generation.
I might be wrong but my explanation is that that plane was able to recover from it because it is an F-22 that uses thrust vectoring which allows it to push its nose downwards without the need for control surfaces, and I think the main reason is that this plane can produce an impressive amount of thrust which is really helpful to get out of a flat spin, other aircraft that do not have these abilities might not recover because the forces acting on the airplane are in equilibrium, while the engine and the control surfaces are completely ineffective. You can see in this video " ua-cam.com/video/ghxQfkngeKI/v-deo.html " an f-14 that lacks any thrust vectoring capability and has relatively weak engines totally failing to recover and the pilot ejecting ultimately.
@@kipweit9634 it just depends on the aircraft like you said also if i'm not mistaken the f22 isn't in a flat spin but is doing a maneuver called a falling leaf
@@kipweit9634 Exiting a flat spin is part of every pilots flight training, not just fighter pilots. IIRC, the procedure is to apply full rudder against the direction of the spin and push the stick/yoke forward and to the side opposed the rudder. As I understand it, this basically 'cups' the airflow over the airframe resisting the rotation, and pushing the nose down. Hopefully there is enough altitude left to fully reestablish airflow over the wings and flight surfaces to stabilize the aircraft afterwards. Some aircraft can fall into flat spins easily(often its the loadout and weight distribution that affects how easily an aircraft can find itself heading towards a flat spin), many are perfectly recoverable(with enough altitude of course, sometimes there just isn't enough left and if you enter a flat spin too close to the ground its simply time to punch out), some airframes are even designed with aerodynamics that will 'auto-recover' into a nose downward angle from flat-spin-like airflow over the airframe. For sure, regardless of the aircraft a flat spin state certainly to be avoided. But 'totally unrecoverable'?! HA! The writers didnt even bother googling the recoverability from a flat spin before pushing the script to the VO booth.....Which really brings into question how well they research the rest of their content, or are the people in charge the type that just speak with authority and knowledge from pulpits built of ignorance and assumption.... ya know, like Inforgraphics does.
There are only 5 fighters currently in service capable of pulling of such meneouver succesfuly J-20, F-22, Su-30M, S-35S and Su-57. Yeah other aircraft might be abble to recover for a flat spin with enough altitude but only those 5 fighters can use a flat spin like maneouver in combat intentionally.
You know how that works; did you see how many times they featured the F22, and plane that flies like a brick, by Sukhoi standards? It is a deliberate attempt to create the impression that everyone, even Westerners, can do everything
Сухие 35 и 57 вне конкуренции конечно по маневренности. Но 22му тоже надо отдать должное. Наверно единственный самолёт который что-то может показать похожее. Да и в целом получается 2 лучшие авиашколы Российская и Американская, европейцы и проичие, монголоиды с негроидами так показать миру ничего впечатляющего и не могут сейчас.
Can’t imagine how fkn fun it is to fly a fighter jet let alone do maneuvers like this… how tf can the plane not get destroyed when doing the cobra, so much force onto the belly of the plane.
Fun fact about the cobra maneuver, in the early 1960s, the maneuver was developed and performed by Swedish pilots flying the Saab 35 fighter jet almost by accident. It was invented during training for recovery from super stalls (also known as deep stalls) to which the double delta tailless design of the Saab 35 is susceptible. A super stall is an uncontrollable stall which is much harder to recover from than a standard stall. Super stall plagued the early years of Saab 35 service, causing several deaths, which led the Swedish air staff to implement extra training on how to counteract and recover from them. The result was the famous cobra maneuver or as the Swedes named it "kort parad" (short parry) after a fencing maneuver of the same name, known as "beat parry" in English. This was done almost 17 years before Viktor Pugachev did this manuever in the SU-27 protoype: Thanks for reading :)
BS dude, the story is invented, the crappy Saab was prone to deadly stall, and the pilots were forced to "invent" any form of acrobatics in order to avoid crashing and death ! Was NOT an intentional maneuver, but yes, a last resort, desperate tentative to avoid death !
@@mirandela777 ua-cam.com/video/jqiDEcfSnXs/v-deo.htmlsi=2wzsm7PV_brAdtLk&t=105 I mean there is literally a video on youtube of swedish pilots excersising the maneuver in a Saab J35 in the late 60's. The SU-27 wasnt even made yet, its kinda hard to deny it at this point unless u are a member of the Modern flat Earth believers.
The scariest thing I've ever seen was an F4 doing a Dutch roll. It was impromptu, at lunchtime over RAAF base Amberley, Aus. A mate and I were walking from the mess and this aircraft was coming straight at us. It appeared to be wallowing, at low speed, it was nose high, nose low in a corkscrewing motion that would make you sea sick. I was convinced it was coming down - right on me. He then did another low speed dirty pass, raised the hook and gear and went vertical punching a hole in the cloud. The third was a high speed pass where he touched mach 1 and broke windows in the Adjutant's office and the service station outside the gate. That was 50 years ago, I have never seen video of anything like this and only recently learnt what it was called. I believe the pilot flew F4s in 'Nam so must have been on secondment to the USAF or may have been USAF here. I was a lowly mechanic, not privy to such matters.
IIRC, the F4 had a dry weight of 29,500lbs. The J-79 engine has a max thrust of 18,000lbs. The F4 Phantom has two J-79 engines totaling 36,000lbs at full reheat. A decommissioned, civilian owned F4 was sitting at the hold short line at a fly in airshow waiting for clearance. Tower, apparently unaware it was an F4 waiting at the line and not yet another C-172, was taking their sweet time and making the F4 wait for a string of slow planes on approach. After repeated calls requesting clearance, the tower fed up finally replied with, 'Look buddy, if you can get to 3000' by the middle of the runway, you can have it." Immediately the F4 pilot radios back, "Roger. Taking runway." Suddenly, before tower could realize their mistake, the air was filled with the roar of twin J-79s spooling up to full burner. As the F4 screamed down the first half of the runway, the pilot lifted off his gear, pulled them up, and yanked the stick back, seeming to explode off the ground in a vertical climb, leveling out at 3000'. F4 pilot, "Clear of runway." after a moment, with laughter heard in the background, tower sheepishly responded, "......Roger. Frequency change to departure approved." Moral of the story, dont give pilots ultimatums they can achieve. The McDonnell Douglas F4 Phantom II. Proof bricks can fly, with enough thrust.
To any gear heads on the ground. If you see these type of moves, do you also get the idea of how awesome these machines truly are. Idea of "losing control" for a moment and then just let the vechile show of the raw power and go "just kidding, everything is under control" makes me respect a lot of those who made those planes possible. Big ups to pilots also, but I think they usually gets enough credit when compared to engineers. Same goes to F1 monsters, those are build to a level that its inspiring just to not know how it works and even more when have some understanding. Respect to drivers and builders.
Little correction: the tailslide and Kvochur’s bell are the same thing. The thing you thought was the bell is something completely different, the reason the bell got its name is because if the plane was flying perpendicular to you, it looks like half of a bell.
Basically, in modern day if you and an enemy got into a dogfight- god forbid a guns only fight- both of you have fucked up massively multiple times Dogfighting theory has been the same basics since ww1, keep your speed, that's it. Speed allows you to dodge, stay out of your enemy's nose and use the vertical, so you can lose speed climbing, then gain it back falling The issue with these manouvers is that they can only be used in the context that you need to lose speed because an enemy behind you (very, very bad)didn't manage their distance well so you try to cause him to overshoot, that is, you go so slow that they can't slow down and fly in front of you And even then these manouvers kill your speed, by the time you recover you lost so much position and now the enemy knows what you might try pulling, if they are expecting that they will have a great big target basically being still
@@istillplayroblox6952 The split S is also called a reversed Immelmann turn and can also be written with a hyphen: split-S. In basic terms, the Immelmann and split S are very similar, both accomplishing the same reversal in course, but the split S exchanges altitude to gain speed, while the Immelmann turn exchanges speed to gain altitude.
I don’t think F-22 pilots are allowed to pull some of these extreme maneuvers, although the plane itself can probably no doubt do all of them. Now the Russian pilots apparently are allowed to do whatever they want without any repercussions. Those guys are insane. They can perform aerial stunts that defy belief. Now if you’re a pilot in a American fighter jet and you’re superiors catch you doing crazy stuff like that, well you could lose your privilege to fly permanently, or put them in the Hack
All of the comments about they are all horizontal, hmmm. I was part of the USMC airwing - not saying too much - and trust and believe, we don't go around showing all the goodies in airshows. I have seen more than I will say. So believe whatever you want to believe, i prefer it that way.😊
Respect to all those pilots who dedicate their lives into this masterpiece of art
Exactly!!!
Engineers. 😂
I love what Sukhoi does with their planes.
Crash and blow up? 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@Asymmetrical-Sagginwhy are u hating bruh
@@Asymmetrical-Saggin no, make everyone else shit themselves and run away rather than engage in a dogfight
@@dawixd2678America
I'd rather have a stealthy aircraft with sensor fusion that can splash any Suck-oi before it knows there's a fight happening.
I had a friend with a Pitts S2-B and he took me up a few times. It's just awe-inspiring that those aerobatic planes- the "unlimited class" and their pilots can maintain spatial orientation while flipping all around, and the planes which can take the forces. THEN, we have these.... BILLION DOLLAR jet fighters doing nearly the same thing! I'm so amazed at this. It's like watching an R/C plane flip and turn, but it's a military jet fighter, not just a stunt plane (meaning, a plane that has a mission so far beyond a "circus act")!
I almost freaked out when i saw S2-B I searched it and I thought your friend flew you in a B2 sprit bomber 😆
I think it’s more awe inspiring that tiny little garage built planes using 1940s tech can manage the same maneuvers as the billion dollar jets. 🙂
Technology plus the skill of the pilots show incredible.
In combat situation:
Technology=> 10%
Pilot skills =>89%
Luck => 1% 😂😂😂😂
@@SUNNYSTARSCOUT365 Balls of steel 100% or 30%
Not just technology and pilot skills, but aircraft design too.
@@SUNNYSTARSCOUT365 More like Technology=60%
Pilot's knowledge of the aircraft= 30%
Luck=10%
@@renascitur7051 more like luck=30% skills=30% tech=40%
So Mr. Pugachev casually unlocked a new tech tree for aerial maneuvers
Minti ca si-o gazeta de perete comunista, american jegos.... Cate KA-52 au doborat ykpahezii, jegosule americoid?
Not really. The move had been known for decades before he made it famous at Le Bourget in 1989. It was only named after him because he put it in the minds of the public. The actual credit for the manoeuvre belongs to Swedish pilots who flew the Saab 35 Draken.
@@anjakellenjeter Incorrect answer . Cobra differs from Pugachev's cobra in that the angle is 120 degrees. F22 made the cobra and SU 35 made the Pugachev cobra.
Frolov's chakra is not a loop, but a rotation of the fighter around its transverse axis. F 22 made a loop, SU 35 Chakra Frolova
Tom Cruise has been doing this for 30 years.
@@ФеликсДзержинский-ф2ш ahh i noticed the slight difference. idk there was another types of cobra movement. learn a lots of thing today. thanks buddy.
Top Gun Maverick showed the Kvochur's Bell maneuver by Russian su-57 to avoid the missile strike.
I can see the value in such manoeuvres in avoiding a missile but I wonder about them in a dog fight. The best fighter pilots always speak of "energy". Coming out of a Cobra you would have zero energy and therefore be vulnerable to a second attack.
@@billthomas635 if you have zero energy you can't properly avoid a missile, and that doesn't help the fact that the people that use these planes will be fighting those with missiles that lock on before the pilot can see the target
In a dogfight this would be great with the incredibly tight turning radius and all, but that probably won't happen often
@@AneriGS i guess that why maverick used it against rooster in their dogfight
@@TheJordan276 I thought he did a Pugachev Cobra
@@nobpyxl5389 He did Jordan got it confused
SU-35 manouvers is so amazing!
America
Russians are the best pilots in the best fighter jets, no close second.
@@Eventual-Visitor Sure bud. It's your fantasy make up whatever bullshit you want.
I love how they are basically all Russian planes
Depends where you are and what you’re watching. I see American planes at air shows do these same maneuvers. Chicago air and water show for years is one example. And then driving through the state of Nebraska near an Air Force base seen two jets flying around out there back in 2009 doing maneuvers I didn’t even think were possible with a plane. Just happen to be at right place at right time. Pulled over and watched it for half hour. Insane stuff. Too cool. The way they fly is cool, but I really dig the sounds. Nothing like the sound of jets flying around to wake you up. Especially when they are coming right at you and you don’t hear anything but silence until they are damn near past you.
Russia is more concerned with tight turning, America focuses on radar
@@_baller wicked stuff.
Didn’t Russian gets wrecked by that Ukraine firefighter pilot😂😂
@@talorb633 mate you really still belive in the Ghost of Kiev, everybody assured it's fake come on 😂, and btw even if it was real, the plane they claimed he used was still soviet so yeah
I have seen SU-30 of IAF performing KULBIT IN Chennai Airshow around 2004-5 at Marina Beach.
So Spectacular!
I have seen cobra,Tail slide etc.
But KULBIT IS THE BEST!
naw man the kvochur KVOCHUR!!!
Maybe they don't want the risk or simply the export engine might not be able to do so, or lack of professionalism
@@umaydniassuh6511 it's not due to the lack of professionalism, it's due to the engines that IAF used at that time. BTW talkin' abt Bhikharistani Air Force, forget about the professionalism, your jets cockpit are made of door hinges 😆😆😆👌👌
Tea was fantastic ☕️
@@Northstar_leo Made from F16's body parts 💩🇵🇰💦☪️🍆💩🐖💨💩🇵🇰
The breathing of pilots doing these manoeuvres must be amazing. Best of the best.
Mình rất thích Su 35S và MiG 29SMT. Máy bay Nga rất tuyệt vời 👍👍👍👍
انتي تحبين الطائرات الروسية لان بلدك تمتلكها 😉👈🇻🇳
@@peacedude-gy3zl потому-что они ЛУЧШИЕ,бродяга!
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺👍👍👍👍
kvorchur's bell is very amazing for su 27
Damn that must feel amazing to be inside that jet making it do that!😲
You don't wanna do that especially with all the G's hitting you hard
I guess you havent heard of “G’s”
Imagine a ghost is aggressively pushing from one direction to another so hard it feels like your soul is leaving your body
at 9 g's you would have the force of 2000 pounds on your body so it really wouldnt feel amazing
Можешь попробовать. Только на учебном самолёте, там 2места
3:19 this looks like the stunt that the su 57 did in top gun maverick
Yep, but it was all CGI in the movie.
@@bertg.6056 we all know Su57 has a 3d trust vectoring able to perform all of maneuvers mentioned in this video .
@@best10clipsoncodm62 Agreed, and we all know it was done in CGI.
@@best10clipsoncodm62 Sure, and it was all done in CGI. Or do you think the Russians lent an Su-57 to Tom Cruise for the movie?
Yeah CGI.,....what else? Do you believe the Russians would lend an SU57 to Tom Cruise and his Wannebee´s??? The biggest Joke of that Movie...F14 against SU 57.....the Felon would have eaten the Tomcat for Breakfast....
Damn those mig 29 and su27 are impressive when flown hard. 7:45 , 0:44
King of kobra maneuver is also su30 forgot to mention,👏
Original Cobra was done by J35 Draken.
@@NAISBAISFSX Nope. "First known aircraft to be capable of and perform the Cobra maneuver.".
@@ThorSuzuki1 He fulfilled it
this is a great explanation. 2 or 3 days ago I actually wanted to learn about this topic. You posted at the right moment thanks 😁👍
And I really love maneuvers they are just lovely
Rusian fighter jets are awesomely beautyfull and perform better than most. .
Nice video! They're dancing in the sky!
I love every maneuver of FLANKERS
Almost all of these are invented by the russians with the help of next level imagination,3d thrust vectoring and Pilot skill.
Lol..!
The russian su30/ 35 are excellent a2a fighters. However, nothing is comparable the f22/f35 and pretty much all the current in service aircraft with modernised upgrades. Ive had the most fun in russian aircraft though. Obviously only through simulation.
@@JCCOOLDOWN Sorry, but so far F35 / 22 show only uselessness and cut the dough on government orders. I won’t say “but our planes are better in every way”, but I will note that when yours are advertised as another Lamborghini, ours simply work effectively.
The new aircraft are comparable, and the old ones are being actively updated to modern standards (the most obvious example of the MiG 31 was the best interceptor (and still is), it also became a reconnaissance aircraft with a bunch of electronics and very serious arguments in armament) (and yes, the MiG seems to want to make a MiG 41, but when it will be and how much it will be a starship is not clear)
By the way, I note that relatively recently the United States also wanted to adjust old fighters to modern standards, instead of completely replacing them with the 5th generation.
@@JCCOOLDOWN I will note that I am not minimizing the fact that the F22 was a real breakthrough 20 years ago.
@@caswinson Damn, your arguments are too convincing, I give up.
3:23 That Su-57 when dogfighting an F-14
5TH GENERATION FIGHTER
Man that Bell Maneuver is really a thing of beauty, came here just to find out what the name of that maneuver is. Thanks for the info.
I’m here after watching Top Gun Maverick. I get the feeling I’m not the only one. Thanks…
God damn! These almost defy the laws of physics. At the least, these jets push the boundaries of what can be done. Incredible!!
The flat spin manuver just breaks the laws of physics
These maneuvers are just so beautiful.
A very skilled and a pilot that's does a lot of flying and knows his jet can work it. These are very skilled pilots.
3:08 "Totally unrecoverable..."
Pilot recovers and flies away
I might be wrong but my explanation is that that plane was able to recover from it because it is an F-22 that uses thrust vectoring which allows it to push its nose downwards without the need for control surfaces, and I think the main reason is that this plane can produce an impressive amount of thrust which is really helpful to get out of a flat spin, other aircraft that do not have these abilities might not recover because the forces acting on the airplane are in equilibrium, while the engine and the control surfaces are completely ineffective.
You can see in this video " ua-cam.com/video/ghxQfkngeKI/v-deo.html " an f-14 that lacks any thrust vectoring capability and has relatively weak engines totally failing to recover and the pilot ejecting ultimately.
@@kipweit9634 it just depends on the aircraft like you said also if i'm not mistaken the f22 isn't in a flat spin but is doing a maneuver called a falling leaf
@@kipweit9634 Exiting a flat spin is part of every pilots flight training, not just fighter pilots. IIRC, the procedure is to apply full rudder against the direction of the spin and push the stick/yoke forward and to the side opposed the rudder. As I understand it, this basically 'cups' the airflow over the airframe resisting the rotation, and pushing the nose down. Hopefully there is enough altitude left to fully reestablish airflow over the wings and flight surfaces to stabilize the aircraft afterwards. Some aircraft can fall into flat spins easily(often its the loadout and weight distribution that affects how easily an aircraft can find itself heading towards a flat spin), many are perfectly recoverable(with enough altitude of course, sometimes there just isn't enough left and if you enter a flat spin too close to the ground its simply time to punch out), some airframes are even designed with aerodynamics that will 'auto-recover' into a nose downward angle from flat-spin-like airflow over the airframe. For sure, regardless of the aircraft a flat spin state certainly to be avoided. But 'totally unrecoverable'?! HA! The writers didnt even bother googling the recoverability from a flat spin before pushing the script to the VO booth.....Which really brings into question how well they research the rest of their content, or are the people in charge the type that just speak with authority and knowledge from pulpits built of ignorance and assumption.... ya know, like Inforgraphics does.
There are only 5 fighters currently in service capable of pulling of such meneouver succesfuly J-20, F-22, Su-30M, S-35S and Su-57. Yeah other aircraft might be abble to recover for a flat spin with enough altitude but only those 5 fighters can use a flat spin like maneouver in combat intentionally.
These maneuvers are quite easy for all the sukhoi variant aircraft 😎
The manoeuvres here were created by pilots that flew no where near the speeds of modern aircraft.
Amazing that current pilots can still manage it.
Nowhere near the speeds of modern aircraft. The Su35S came into service in 2014; the Su57 is not even in serial production...
Kvochur maneuver, wow... Top gun Maverick... Love it
American dream films win su57 on f-14 LOL 🤣🤣🤣
Русские пилоты лучшие ❤️
В компьютерных боях и полетах 🙈😱🤡
@@ВасилийБуланов-с2т мда да ты Експерт 😂😂
спасибо )
The F14 used to be my favourite fighter jet, but damn (and by that I mean DAMN) that SU 57 is one sexy piece of kit.
6:16 saab draken didnt even pull 120 aoa, yet shes included but not su30/33/35?
Su-30 33 and 35 are all a su-27 variants
You know how that works; did you see how many times they featured the F22, and plane that flies like a brick, by Sukhoi standards? It is a deliberate attempt to create the impression that everyone, even Westerners, can do everything
@@DimbweMazala they just hate how russian planes are made for both bvr and super-maneuverabilities 😂
Сухие 35 и 57 вне конкуренции конечно по маневренности. Но 22му тоже надо отдать должное. Наверно единственный самолёт который что-то может показать похожее.
Да и в целом получается 2 лучшие авиашколы Российская и Американская, европейцы и проичие, монголоиды с негроидами так показать миру ничего впечатляющего и не могут сейчас.
Тебя это удивляет?)
the last clip of su35 so badass
THANK YOU. It was a great presentation which I looked forward for a long time.
I’m impressed with these pilots and aircraft but do a outside loop and I’ll be blown away.
And the pilot will be dead before he can finish the loop
Can’t imagine how fkn fun it is to fly a fighter jet let alone do maneuvers like this… how tf can the plane not get destroyed when doing the cobra, so much force onto the belly of the plane.
3:15 how to dodge missile with style
That Russian guy on TGM 🔥
Fun fact about the cobra maneuver, in the early 1960s, the maneuver was developed and performed by Swedish pilots flying the Saab 35 fighter jet almost by accident. It was invented during training for recovery from super stalls (also known as deep stalls) to which the double delta tailless design of the Saab 35 is susceptible. A super stall is an uncontrollable stall which is much harder to recover from than a standard stall. Super stall plagued the early years of Saab 35 service, causing several deaths, which led the Swedish air staff to implement extra training on how to counteract and recover from them. The result was the famous cobra maneuver or as the Swedes named it "kort parad" (short parry) after a fencing maneuver of the same name, known as "beat parry" in English. This was done almost 17 years before Viktor Pugachev did this manuever in the SU-27 protoype:
Thanks for reading :)
Why they called it Pugachev cobra then?!
@@duman5596 Because the Swede is lying. He wants to show how important and beautiful he is!
@@duman5596because it wasn't shown on a show but you can search and see for yourself
BS dude, the story is invented, the crappy Saab was prone to deadly stall, and the pilots were forced to "invent" any form of acrobatics in order to avoid crashing and death ! Was NOT an intentional maneuver, but yes, a last resort, desperate tentative to avoid death !
@@mirandela777
ua-cam.com/video/jqiDEcfSnXs/v-deo.htmlsi=2wzsm7PV_brAdtLk&t=105
I mean there is literally a video on youtube of swedish pilots excersising the maneuver in a Saab J35 in the late 60's.
The SU-27 wasnt even made yet, its kinda hard to deny it at this point unless u are a member of the Modern flat Earth believers.
Cobra is the beast with g forces in action.
In terms maneuver always Russia jets take the win...
The scariest thing I've ever seen was an F4 doing a Dutch roll. It was impromptu, at lunchtime over RAAF base Amberley, Aus. A mate and I were walking from the mess and this aircraft was coming straight at us. It appeared to be wallowing, at low speed, it was nose high, nose low in a corkscrewing motion that would make you sea sick. I was convinced it was coming down - right on me. He then did another low speed dirty pass, raised the hook and gear and went vertical punching a hole in the cloud. The third was a high speed pass where he touched mach 1 and broke windows in the Adjutant's office and the service station outside the gate. That was 50 years ago, I have never seen video of anything like this and only recently learnt what it was called.
I believe the pilot flew F4s in 'Nam so must have been on secondment to the USAF or may have been USAF here. I was a lowly mechanic, not privy to such matters.
I seem to recall the same shit happening over outer Sale in Victoria, Australia. Their pilots used to do some cooked shit every now and then.
IIRC, the F4 had a dry weight of 29,500lbs. The J-79 engine has a max thrust of 18,000lbs. The F4 Phantom has two J-79 engines totaling 36,000lbs at full reheat.
A decommissioned, civilian owned F4 was sitting at the hold short line at a fly in airshow waiting for clearance. Tower, apparently unaware it was an F4 waiting at the line and not yet another C-172, was taking their sweet time and making the F4 wait for a string of slow planes on approach. After repeated calls requesting clearance, the tower fed up finally replied with, 'Look buddy, if you can get to 3000' by the middle of the runway, you can have it." Immediately the F4 pilot radios back, "Roger. Taking runway." Suddenly, before tower could realize their mistake, the air was filled with the roar of twin J-79s spooling up to full burner. As the F4 screamed down the first half of the runway, the pilot lifted off his gear, pulled them up, and yanked the stick back, seeming to explode off the ground in a vertical climb, leveling out at 3000'. F4 pilot, "Clear of runway." after a moment, with laughter heard in the background, tower sheepishly responded, "......Roger. Frequency change to departure approved."
Moral of the story, dont give pilots ultimatums they can achieve.
The McDonnell Douglas F4 Phantom II. Proof bricks can fly, with enough thrust.
Might be one of my favorite new airframe stories. Thanks for sharing. Cheers.
Those Russian jet fighters pilots does maneuver that the US military would’ve never let us do without getting grounded
Maverick does the cobra twice once to kill rooster in training and another to save his life in combat
Kvocher’s bell is what the unnamed enemy 5th gen does when Maverick and rooster get missile lock on it in the F-14, then rooster says “wtf was that”
@@alexrandell9199 No shit
@@nyg_dbone oh I just thought we were pointing out cool maneuvers from the movie 😔
@@alexrandell9199 Ok lol
Well, basically all Russian aircraft in service can do all of these......at least the US had a three legged horse in this race
😂😂😂
Breathtaking footage thanks for your time and contribution for all of us to enjoy.!
Diagrams that look nothing like the physical space of the maneuver. Good work.
To any gear heads on the ground. If you see these type of moves, do you also get the idea of how awesome these machines truly are. Idea of "losing control" for a moment and then just let the vechile show of the raw power and go "just kidding, everything is under control" makes me respect a lot of those who made those planes possible. Big ups to pilots also, but I think they usually gets enough credit when compared to engineers. Same goes to F1 monsters, those are build to a level that its inspiring just to not know how it works and even more when have some understanding. Respect to drivers and builders.
What is the maneuver at minute 7:45? I think it's more useful than original cobra because it maintain forward momentum.
It was the last one i think
It's the kvochur bell maneuver
It's the same move the su-57 did in top gun maverick
@@An_idot ""what the hell was that ?""
Little correction: the tailslide and Kvochur’s bell are the same thing. The thing you thought was the bell is something completely different, the reason the bell got its name is because if the plane was flying perpendicular to you, it looks like half of a bell.
cobra bc i love the draken and its sooooooo cool
I was so impressed at a munuver I saw in top gun and wanted to know the name .thanks for this video ❤❤
Excellent narration! Great accent..
The pugachev's cobra menuver is my favourite
Love of these menu-vers.
рОССИЙСКИЕ САМОЛЕТЫ САМЫЕ ЛУЧШИЕ! СПАСИБО ЕЩЕ ПИЛОТАМ!!!!!МЫ В ВАС ВЕРЕМ
Так - горять найкраще...
Whose here because of that enemy pilot maneuver in Top Gun: Maverick? Kvochur Bell Maneuver is what he did to evade Maverick's missile btw.
I like the cobra maneuver.
I love these videos
Where people who have no idea what they're talking about tell us what a cobra is
I can only imagine how many G's you have to handle while making the cobra maneuver.
I love the cobra manuver
like the manouvers
How many G's does the Kulbit maneuver yield? my goodness..
Thanks for teaching me how to do a kickflip.
my favorite one is the the cobra maneuver
name of the maneuver in which the plane moves forward while nose of the plane points at the sky , releasing flares .
Russian trust vectoring manouvering abilities are best in the world.
actually to add to the Cobra. I've seen a video of an F22 doing it while also dropping flares
So what's the defference between Flat Spin and Falling Leaf?
Too good ...
Instant like right here.
Nice Vid
Learnt alot
AMAZING INTEL !! THANKS
One word....DAMN
I subscribed cos of your voice
Cobra is the best one !
Suhoki 30 mki cobra maneuver
I am very impressed with these aerobatic skills, but I wonder how much of this has actually proven to be useful in modern combat.
If you see russian jets much more active then Americans best jest . After all russians love to fight
Basically, in modern day if you and an enemy got into a dogfight- god forbid a guns only fight- both of you have fucked up massively multiple times
Dogfighting theory has been the same basics since ww1, keep your speed, that's it. Speed allows you to dodge, stay out of your enemy's nose and use the vertical, so you can lose speed climbing, then gain it back falling
The issue with these manouvers is that they can only be used in the context that you need to lose speed because an enemy behind you (very, very bad)didn't manage their distance well so you try to cause him to overshoot, that is, you go so slow that they can't slow down and fly in front of you
And even then these manouvers kill your speed, by the time you recover you lost so much position and now the enemy knows what you might try pulling, if they are expecting that they will have a great big target basically being still
It is a SU-35S (Flanker E) not SU-27. Please find original video
I like the split-s
What happened to Immelman and Reverse Immelman?
Evolution but I am sure they still have their place
@@raymondweaver8526 It is basic, but good. I have done both.
You mean Split S?
@@istillplayroblox6952 Split S is good, too, but no. Immelman is an old WWI move. It is simply a half loop with a roll over to do a 180 turn.
@@istillplayroblox6952 The split S is also called a reversed Immelmann turn and can also be written with a hyphen: split-S. In basic terms, the Immelmann and split S are very similar, both accomplishing the same reversal in course, but the split S exchanges altitude to gain speed, while the Immelmann turn exchanges speed to gain altitude.
cobra maneouver is my favourite
Great Shukoy and Mig real Super Manuver
TOP GUN MAVERICK has bell tailslide and purgachev´s in it !
Gotta love the Kvochar Bell cuz of Top Gun Maverick
I think we saw the Kvochur Bell maneuver in Top Gun: Maverick, when the 2nd 5th gen fighter dodged Mav's missile.
American 🇺🇸 pilot is absolutely out of this contest .
the kvochur bell is a vertical flat spin
amazing！😮
We see F-22 tried to do those maneuvers.....but clearly, Sukhoi did them much better.
Russian fighter jets mostly focuses on maneuverability compared to the Americans.
F22 Raptor jago dalam pameran , ketika terdeteksi SU35 terbang ,F22 & F35 aktifkan program siluman dalam hanggar 😂 .
Who is coming from Ace Combat 7
Me
Great video
I love this channel ❤️ 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🤙🏾
I don’t think F-22 pilots are allowed to pull some of these extreme maneuvers, although the plane itself can probably no doubt do all of them. Now the Russian pilots apparently are allowed to do whatever they want without any repercussions. Those guys are insane. They can perform aerial stunts that defy belief. Now if you’re a pilot in a American fighter jet and you’re superiors catch you doing crazy stuff like that, well you could lose your privilege to fly permanently, or put them in the Hack
noice use of catia
Pogachev cobra is amazing
Man the days of looping around to get bore sight on is over. They literally just spun around like a roller blades
All of the comments about they are all horizontal, hmmm. I was part of the USMC airwing - not saying too much - and trust and believe, we don't go around showing all the goodies in airshows. I have seen more than I will say. So believe whatever you want to believe, i prefer it that way.😊