A year ago when I had just started to read on free energy, this video was so heavy that I felt physically sick from the pressure of trying to understand it. Now, watching it for the first time since then, I can understand and appreciate 80 percent of it but the remaining heavy 20 percent is still upsetting my stomach😅... maybe I should revisit in a year again
Is this affected by the cmb ? Meaning if newtons orginal oreintation and direction is correct with einstein reductionism but cmb grand unified evolutionary theory is wrong would it matter?
@@cosalidra759 @twose7en Well, your wishes are almost fullfilled here: ua-cam.com/video/J6eJ44Jq_pw/v-deo.htmlsi=eH2adDsrfdSVzhSJ My experience is that Chris Fields is pretty aligned with Donald Hoffman when it comes yo consciousness.
Electromagnetic field is because of exchanging virtual photon with space or quantum field. Weak force is due to exchange of virtual photon at smaller scale n so is strong nuclear force.
The Markov blanket is a plausible concept but, as far as I was able to search, it is a concept that has not caught on. Ultimately, all the picture remains highly speculative. Maybe I don't really appreciate its value.
To bad it is exactly (or close to) the same presentation as he has given a lot of times. Would like to see him talk more about "projective consciousness model".
Markov Blankets and Conscious agent concepts stunned me
Thank you so much for sharing the video! treasure!
A year ago when I had just started to read on free energy, this video was so heavy that I felt physically sick from the pressure of trying to understand it. Now, watching it for the first time since then, I can understand and appreciate 80 percent of it but the remaining heavy 20 percent is still upsetting my stomach😅... maybe I should revisit in a year again
It's not quite a year but how's your stomach?
Brilliant
Is this affected by the cmb ? Meaning if newtons orginal oreintation and direction is correct with einstein reductionism but cmb grand unified evolutionary theory is wrong would it matter?
Would love to see Donald Hoffman compare these ideas to his Conscious Agent theory, which involves Markov kernels
Exactly what i was thinking. Add Michael Levin into the mix. My dream panel.
@@cosalidra759 @twose7en Well, your wishes are almost fullfilled here:
ua-cam.com/video/J6eJ44Jq_pw/v-deo.htmlsi=eH2adDsrfdSVzhSJ
My experience is that Chris Fields is pretty aligned with Donald Hoffman when it comes yo consciousness.
You'd think plugging these formulas into a computer, it would start to think?
it would reduce resource consumption and the way we're making them learn for sure
Is there a way to obtain Dr. Friston's slides?
Electromagnetic field is because of exchanging virtual photon with space or quantum field. Weak force is due to exchange of virtual photon at smaller scale n so is strong nuclear force.
The Markov blanket is a plausible concept but, as far as I was able to search, it is a concept that has not caught on. Ultimately, all the picture remains highly speculative. Maybe I don't really appreciate its value.
To bad it is exactly (or close to) the same presentation as he has given a lot of times. Would like to see him talk more about "projective consciousness model".
Except the last part. Don´t think I´ve seen it before. atleast not outside his articles.
@@Benjamin93swe1 The simulation of primordial soup at 32:23 were mind bending
Gravity is virttual photon exchange between space n particle.