No Muslim Can Deal With This Argument!!!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 вер 2024
- #islam #quran #muslim
Donations Welcome!
Paypal: www.paypal.me/...
Support The Patreon If You Enjoy Daily Clips & Content : patreon.com/Li...
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @godlogic2.0
UA-cam Super Thanks: ( Can Be Found Under Any Video You Watch )
Looks like most Muslims don't even know the Quran, good job G!
They’re literally taught ignorance. Look at Apostate Prophets video on why he left Islam. When reading the quran he was told to read with an imam. That’s the complete opposite to what I was taught when reading the bible. Which was to read the bible with an open mind and god will be your guide to understanding. Don’t get me wrong I had to do independent research of the bible. But it strengthened my understanding as it opened my eyes to the historical context of things like the Israelites abducting girls in battle. Which I thought was a moral wrong. But in Bronze Age Judaea the idea of giving back abducted girls was insane. Or those little historical nuggets like the comments about something good come from Nazareth. Or why the Jews would reject Jesus vs the Samaritan woman at the well.
These things that forced me to look deeper strengthened my faith. Heck even the idea that Matthew Mark Luke and John all telling alight differences to the same story. We know because of modern research on the mind, and memories. It makes sense that details what was said wouldn’t match up 1/1. So those “contradictions” that are pointed out make me believe the authors were giving their honest opinion of the events that take place. And the 11 and Paul didn’t conspire to match their stories.
We have manuscripts they have dawah scripts! 😂😂😂
glad you do have man u scripts..
🤣🤣🤣
@@TheLegend2000AD The Day] when Allāh will say, "O Jesus, Son of Mary, remember My favor upon you and upon your mother when I supported you with the Pure Spirit [i.e., the angel Gabriel] and you spoke to the people in the cradle and in maturity; and [remember] when I taught you writing and wisdom and the Torah and the Gospel; and when you designed from clay [what was] like the form of a bird with My permission, then you breathed into it, and it became a bird with My permission; and you healed the blind [from birth] and the leper with My permission; and when you brought forth the dead with My permission; and when I restrained the Children of Israel from [killing] you when you came to them with clear proofs and those who disbelieved among them said, "This is not but obvious magic." Surah 5:110
Go check out the recently deciphered manuscripts of a miracle when Jesus PBUH was a child bringing clay birds to life, which is not in the Bible
@@johnogrady_ bro what this gotta do with anything?😭
@johnogrady_ it came from gnostic forgeries 100s of years before the quran. Which Muhammad heard from a gnostic before he deemed himself a prophet. Why the copy?
@@tenshiman1490
well, you're right..
the NT was indeed written by the Greco-Romans for the Roman pagans.. there are too many similiarities in the NT which are coped from the Roman mythos..
Romulus is assasinated by the Roman Senate.
Jesus is crucified by the Roman Governor.
A darkness fell when Romulus died.
A darkness fell when Jesus died.
The body of Romulus was missing.
The body of Jesus was missing.
Proculus annouced he had seen Romulus again.
The young man announced he saw Jesus had risen.
Romulus said the gods planned that he would only be on earth a short time.
Jesus was only on earth a short time.
Another account said Romulus had been caught up in a whirlwind and taken up to heaven.
Another account (Luke) said Jesus had been taken up to heaven.
why the copy.?
Dishonesty is the pillar of Allah and Islam...
You are so very correct!
@@citizen8491 AMEN
The Muslim shuffle is real .
Every day they're shufflin'
Is there a honest Muslim out there? The verbal and mental gymnastics are astounding when they get caught. They are so determined to believe the lie. Astounding! Logic is non existent !
Even Allah and Muhammad are not honest
That's why the REAL God forsakes them.....they so readily believe the lies
@@DevotedSign Having a few scraps from within a hundred years of when the New Testament was written does not give us what we’d really like to have: complete manuscripts from near the time the authors published their books. If our first reasonably complete copies of the New Testament do not appear until two or three centuries after the books were first put in circulation, that’s two or three hundred years of scribes copying and recopying, making mistakes, multiplying mistakes, changing the text in ways big and small before we have complete copies. We can’t compare these, our oldest surviving copies, with yet older ones to see where their mistakes are. There aren’t any older ones.
And the problems get worse. In later times, when we have an abundance of manuscripts, the copyists of the New Testament were trained scribes-usually monks in monasteries who copied manuscripts as a sacred duty. These monks of the Middle Ages did their level best-most, but not all, of the time-to copy their texts accurately. They sometimes got tired and inattentive and made mistakes; and they sometimes changed the text because they thought it was supposed to be changed. Still, for the most part they did a good job. But that was only much later in Christian history. In the earliest centuries, the vast majority of copyists of the New Testament books were not trained scribes. We know this because we can examine their copies and evaluate the quality of their handwriting, and we can assess how accurately they did their work. The striking and disappointing fact is that our earliest manuscripts of the New Testament have far more mistakes and differences in them than our later ones. The earlier we go in the history of copying these texts, the less skilled and attentive the scribes appear to have been.
Another way to put this: if you take two New Testament manuscripts from around the year 1000 and compare them to one another, they are often very much alike in every verse. But if you do the same thing with the fragmentary copies made around the year 200, you find lots and lots of differences-differences both from the manuscripts of the year 1000 and, more disconcertingly, differences from one another. This tells us that the earliest scribes were not as skilled or assiduous as the later ones. And that’s a problem, because all of our surviving manuscripts were copied from earlier manuscripts, and the earliest copies of all were filled with mistakes. If our earliest known copyists made tons of mistakes, how many mistakes were made by their predecessors, who produced the copies that they copied? We have no way of knowing. By Bart Ehrman
Logic confuses them.
Making them think hurts their heads.
Amen you are so so true . You have me cracking up with laughter on my workplace so God blessing be upon you and your entire family "Continue your great comments and stay strong
He is parroting what his religious leaders have taught him not actually what he has read and understood. Like so many they don’t actually read their holy book. They also make it difficult for others to read it saying it must be read in their language for it to be accurate.
Knowledge in Islam is anathema to real salvation. 🙏
This dude went against he's own Quran.. the literal word in he's face which he agreed with.. and still says the Bible is corrupt CRAZZZYYY
Watching live from South Africa man this so exiting guys, man big ups to you Godlogic I am a big fan, I am learning a lot from you
Shoutout
1:15. So wait a minute, he says that Paul’s sayings are being mistranslated. I highly doubt he knows Greek, Hebrew, or Aramaic.
However, when that same concept is applied to Islam it’s “Well you have to know Arabic for the PROPER TRANSLATION”?
🤷♂️
This abdool's profilepic is litteraly the devil's horn sign. Maaan get out of here 😅
They always say it has been changed but can’t show what it was changed from textually
3rd time listening to this clip. Yet it's as new as the 1st time 😂 Yashuwa Akbar than 'lah
Here for the Algorithm. God is great! Christ the King is risen indeed! 🙌🙏
They always say "according to islam" but ive learned that "According to Islam" does NOT mean "according to the Quran"
Muslims: We reject Paul!
Mohammed: But I said he was a disciple...
LOL
I blame the 5 daily prayers they recite... It burns braincells
well, God gave you the brain.. so use it.. 1+1+1= ??
I Blame This Garbage Called Religion!......😅
I Blame This Stupidity Called Religion!......
😂😂
This is more true than you'd believe. It doesn't burn brain cells but
It does cast a spell. They dig a hole and each prayer is a shovel full. The longer they continue this pagan practice the deeper the hole gets, the harder it is to climb out, the more they only can see the hole they are in.
My favorite chef 👩🏾🍳
That is EXACTLY what he was doing with the impish behaviour in the background and the usual circular waffle!? Evil can only exist off the back of goodness and then flees when exposed to truth and light.
He's not making no sense smh 🤦 he's making up stories my head hurts
Man. Sadly this is typical of most Muslims I have met. Pray for these poor people. They need it!
Logic is doing the Lord's work for real.
How can Paul be a false teacher when he was a Pharisee beforehe was converted? He knew all the Jewish laws and trained by Gamaliel, a Jewish Pharisees scholar.
if we Steel Man it..1) He never knew Jesus...not personally...only a vision on the road to Damascus. 2) You can't escape the Hellenic world view of Paul and it's influence. 3) He had some disagreements with the disciples when he went to Jeruselum, 3) His personally maleabilty with the "Law"...ie when I'm with jews I'm jewish...etc. 4) Paul is first...which means he might have had influence over Mark's and the later disciples' writings...
@@Thadd107 Good teaching you are so right
@@bryanherward4679 He didn't have some disagreement, he only said to peter to stop acting with hypocrisy when jews were around. Peter was eating with the proto christians and when jews were coming, he was going to the table of jews letting his brothers in christ alone.
Paul then told him to stop being a hypocrite and be equal to everyone. Peter had some bad maneers that Paul blame to him.
Nothing about the faith or the teaching of the Bible.
@@daviddruart4948 Personally, there's a power play between Peter, James and Paul as to who is chosen to guide the new movement. James is pissed at Paul for telling Jews that they don't have to follow the Law...doesn't say outright but implies that the Law...(the purity ritual portions...not things like the Commandments...) ...that they aren't neccesary for the new movement...That's why you see James' followers later being pointed out ...possible the beginnings of the Ebionites...?
@@bryanherward4679 Yeah but here, that is not major things for faith, so nothing really wrong tbf
Busted by GodLogic!!!
Again!!!
This angle and verse at the end were awesome, a rock and a hard place springs to mind. Excellent
THEY WANT TO ARGUE AND THEY DON'T EVEN KNOW THE CORRECT STORY BEHIND PAUL AND THE DISCIPLES
You can tell they are programmed to believe what they believe because once you ask them questions or say give me the evidence they malfunction lol
He got caught! ahhha
Had I known he would of been a bit complicated 🤷🏾♂️😂😂😂
Doesn't the Quran say that the gospels are accurate
Quran 3:71
O People of the Scripture, why do you confuse the truth with falsehood and conceal the truth while you know [it]?
🤣🤣🤣
@WhatHappenToMyComments But you are amongst the same muslims that will claim that we don't have a book, so you need to choose if you want us to be the people of the Scripture or not. And by the same claim what Scripture is he talking about?
@@WhatHappenToMyComments what was the truth they knew?
@@WhatHappenToMyComments 3:64) Say:56 'People of the Book! Come to a word common between us and you:57 that we shall serve none but Allah and shall associate none with Him in His divinity and that some of us will not take others as lords beside Allah.' And if they turn their backs (from accepting this call), tell them: 'Bear witness that we are the ones who have submitted ourselves exclusively to Allah.'
(3:65) People of the Book! Why do you dispute with us about Abraham even though the Torah and the Gospel were not revealed until after the time of Abraham? Do you not understand?
(3:66) Behold, you are those who have disputed greatly concerning matters which you knew; why are you now disputing about matters that you know nothing about? Allah knows it whereas you do not know.
(3:67) Abraham was neither a Jew nor a Christian; he was a Muslim, wholly devoted to God.59 And he certainly was not amongst those who associate others with Allah in His divinity.
(3:68) Surely the people who have the best claim to a relationship with Abraham are those who followed him in the past, and presently this Prophet and those who believe in him; Allah is the guardian of the men of faith.
(3:69) A party of the People of the Book would fain lead you astray, whereas in truth they lead none astray except themselves, but they do not realize it.
(3:70) O People of the Book! Why do you reject the signs of Allah even though you yourselves witness them?
(3:71) People of the Book! Why do you confound Truth with falsehood, and why do you conceal the Truth knowingly?
These are the ayats and it is referring to Jews and Christian’s, and where is the Gospel According to Jesus PBUH that’s the one we look for???
Where’s the Gospel According to Jesus PBUH???
Hadi's picture says it all . Hand with the devil horns.
Sounds like he should’ve been in the back playing with the children 😂😂
Bro asking What is believer of Jesus? What is success?. What is Islam even, what is Quran? Simple questions
Matthew, Mark, Luke & John ARE THE English Transliteration of those Hebraic & Greek Names.
Their “actual” Names would been more like, “Mateos, Marcon or Markus, Luca or Lucas, &Johann or Johannican
This guy just keeps repeating like a mantra that the writings were changed
My Imam told me soea. Hearsay evidence is not acceptable evidence.
At 14: Man, what is it? Is it Mark, Matthew, the disciples? The church father writings? He has nothing to base his claims. He is just repeating the lies he was taught.
What lies that all the Gospels are based off of mark which one of the earliest church apostolic Greek fathers papias of heiropolis writes in gospel origins??
Bart Ehrmans own words-Having a few scraps from within a hundred years of when the New Testament was written does not give us what we’d really like to have: complete manuscripts from near the time the authors published their books. If our first reasonably complete copies of the New Testament do not appear until two or three centuries after the books were first put in circulation, that’s two or three hundred years of scribes copying and recopying, making mistakes, multiplying mistakes, changing the text in ways big and small before we have complete copies. We can’t compare these, our oldest surviving copies, with yet older ones to see where their mistakes are. There aren’t any older ones.
And the problems get worse. In later times, when we have an abundance of manuscripts, the copyists of the New Testament were trained scribes-usually monks in monasteries who copied manuscripts as a sacred duty. These monks of the Middle Ages did their level best-most, but not all, of the time-to copy their texts accurately. They sometimes got tired and inattentive and made mistakes; and they sometimes changed the text because they thought it was supposed to be changed. Still, for the most part they did a good job. But that was only much later in Christian history. In the earliest centuries, the vast majority of copyists of the New Testament books were not trained scribes. We know this because we can examine their copies and evaluate the quality of their handwriting, and we can assess how accurately they did their work. The striking and disappointing fact is that our earliest manuscripts of the New Testament have far more mistakes and differences in them than our later ones. The earlier we go in the history of copying these texts, the less skilled and attentive the scribes appear to have been.
Another way to put this: if you take two New Testament manuscripts from around the year 1000 and compare them to one another, they are often very much alike in every verse. But if you do the same thing with the fragmentary copies made around the year 200, you find lots and lots of differences-differences both from the manuscripts of the year 1000 and, more disconcertingly, differences from one another. This tells us that the earliest scribes were not as skilled or assiduous as the later ones. And that’s a problem, because all of our surviving manuscripts were copied from earlier manuscripts, and the earliest copies of all were filled with mistakes. If our earliest known copyists made tons of mistakes, how many mistakes were made by their predecessors, who produced the copies that they copied? We have no way of knowing.
Exactly what I was thinking smh 🤦
Muslims are having doubts about the dawah scripts.. the scripts ain’t working anymore 😂😂
Damn more than one billion broken records. That gonna be hell of fixing.
2 Chronicles 15:2....The Lord is with you when you are with him. If you seek him, he will be found by you, but if you abandon him, he will abandon you.
When they start dancing and mumbling 😅 I just can’t listen no more to the Muslim brother.
ς 6
ξ, 60
X. 600
Look similar to something 🤔
Should be made into meme.
This Muslim boy may be realised the truth,,,,,,,,,
iōannēs = John in English it's translated it's not like he ran around drinking tea and eating crumpets and saying bloody hell
Thank you for being honest. lol. He lied all the way through
The devil hates Apostle Paul becos the devil knows tt people who read n study Paul's epistles will turn to Jesus Who will save them from their sins n transform their lives so they can be in Jesus' heaven in the afterlife. The devil wants all people to not be saved by Jesus so they will go with the devil to hell in their afterlife. Dont be influenced by the devil who only comes to steal, kill n destroy n is a liar.
Narrated Anas bin Malik: Allah's Apostle was on a journey and he had a black slave called Anjasha, and he was driving the camels (very fast, and there were women riding on those camels). Allah's Apostle said, "Waihaka (May Allah be merciful to you), O Anjasha! Drive slowly (the camels) with the glass vessels (women)!"
- Sahih al-Bukhari, 8:73:182 see also Sahih al- Bukhari, 8:73:229 Sahih al-Bukhari, 8:73:221
Muhammad towards the end of his life.. showed so much concern about something.. one day he got up, turned towards his Companions and strongly warned us.. he says..
"O my people.! I fear of you..
do not exceed the limits as the Christians did.. Satan had bewitched and taken hold of them.. do not exaggerate in praising me as the Christians praised the son of Mary, so always refer to me as just the Slave of Allah and His Messenger"
(Hadith by Bukhari and Muslim)
Christian don't praise son of Mary but son of God 😂😂😂. You are a clown nd your profet @@WhatHappenToMyComments
More grace soldier of God
Mohammed deceived this guys because he is a sinner
Sounds like another muslim dilema.
Stupidity is amazing. - CP
So if the injeel is lost, then the unbelievers won. Which means the Quron is wrong.
11:30 is this kid listening to himself talk ? 😂
John in English ? What about ISA ? Who is ISA we dont know him.
Please Avery try another music, this is torturous
Abtoooool drink too much camel beee he sound like a broken record 🤣😂🤣
Is this live
Matthew and Mark from the quran 🤭😂😂😂
Islam doesn't work. Come to Christ, He is the one and only way to Paradise. He said so, so if you deny that, you deny that Jesus was a prophet too, and then Islam is false anyway!
Logic = Logos = Jesus = God 😀 😀 😀
Who kids in the background ..😂😂
He is a believer in Isa,, not in Jesus Christ.
It was supposed to say God logic sorry voice text
You will c argument when you die.
This Muslim is telling nonsense. If Sinaiticus Vaticanicus do not contain Mark 16:10 till the end of the chapter, this prove nothing.
In the 2nd century, Irenaeus (130-202) and Hyppolitus of Rome (170-227) quote Mark 16:19.
Bmore GodLogic 2.0 👍🏾👍💯
Take care 😂😂😂😂
“But I want you to know that the head of every man is the Christ; in turn, the head of a woman is the man; in turn, the head of the Christ is God.” 1 Corinthians 11:3
PLEASE ASK HIM HOW TO RECONCILE WHY IT IS NECESSARY FOR THE CREATOR GOD THAT HE SAYS IS A TRINITY TO HAVE TO HAVE BROTHERS: “For both the one who is sanctifying and those who are being sanctified all stem from one, and for this reason he is not ashamed to call them brothers,” Hebrews 2:11;
BECAUSE WE ARE CLEARLY TOLD THAT THEY “ALL STEM FROM ONE” NOT 3 AND: “Jesus said to her: “Stop clinging to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father. But go to my brothers and say to them, ‘I am ascending to my Father and your Father and to my God and your God.’” John 20:17; “We know that God makes all his works cooperate together for the good of those who love God, those who are the ones called according to his purpose; 29 because those whom he gave his first recognition he also foreordained to be patterned after the image of his Son, so that he might be the firstborn among many brothers.” Romans 8:28,29
ALSO SINCE JESUS IS THE HIGH PRIEST UPON HIS RETURN TO HEAVEN AND THOSE OF HIS DISCIPLES WHO WILL JOIN HIM IN HEAVEN WILL BECOME PRIESTS AS WELL: “And they sing a new song, saying: “You are worthy to take the scroll and open its seals, for you were slaughtered and with your blood you bought people for God out of every tribe and tongue and people and nation, 10 and you made them to be a kingdom and priests to our God, and they are to rule as kings over the earth.” Revelation 5:9,10
ALSO UPON JESUS COMPLETION OF HIS ASSIGNMENT WE ARE TOLD: “Next, the end, when he hands over the Kingdom to his God and Father, when he has brought to nothing all government and all authority and power. 27 For God “subjected all things under his feet.” But when he says that ‘all things have been subjected,’ it is evident that this does not include the One who subjected all things to him. 28 But when all things will have been subjected to him, then the Son himself will also subject himself to the One who subjected all things to him, that God may be all things to everyone.” 1 Corinthians 15:24,27,28
HOW IS IT POSSIBLE FOR GOD TO BE 3-N-1 WHERE THERE IS NO SUCH TEACHING OF THIS IN THE BIBLE: “4 Certainly not! But let God be found true, even if every man be found a liar, just as it is written: “That you might be proved righteous in your words and might win when you are being judged.” Romans 3:4
Having a few scraps from within a hundred years of when the New Testament was written does not give us what we’d really like to have: complete manuscripts from near the time the authors published their books. If our first reasonably complete copies of the New Testament do not appear until two or three centuries after the books were first put in circulation, that’s two or three hundred years of scribes copying and recopying, making mistakes, multiplying mistakes, changing the text in ways big and small before we have complete copies. We can’t compare these, our oldest surviving copies, with yet older ones to see where their mistakes are. There aren’t any older ones.
And the problems get worse. In later times, when we have an abundance of manuscripts, the copyists of the New Testament were trained scribes-usually monks in monasteries who copied manuscripts as a sacred duty. These monks of the Middle Ages did their level best-most, but not all, of the time-to copy their texts accurately. They sometimes got tired and inattentive and made mistakes; and they sometimes changed the text because they thought it was supposed to be changed. Still, for the most part they did a good job. But that was only much later in Christian history. In the earliest centuries, the vast majority of copyists of the New Testament books were not trained scribes. We know this because we can examine their copies and evaluate the quality of their handwriting, and we can assess how accurately they did their work. The striking and disappointing fact is that our earliest manuscripts of the New Testament have far more mistakes and differences in them than our later ones. The earlier we go in the history of copying these texts, the less skilled and attentive the scribes appear to have been.
Another way to put this: if you take two New Testament manuscripts from around the year 1000 and compare them to one another, they are often very much alike in every verse. But if you do the same thing with the fragmentary copies made around the year 200, you find lots and lots of differences-differences both from the manuscripts of the year 1000 and, more disconcertingly, differences from one another. This tells us that the earliest scribes were not as skilled or assiduous as the later ones. And that’s a problem, because all of our surviving manuscripts were copied from earlier manuscripts, and the earliest copies of all were filled with mistakes. If our earliest known copyists made tons of mistakes, how many mistakes were made by their predecessors, who produced the copies that they copied? We have no way of knowing. Bart Ehrmans own words
Paul taught the opposite of the Abraham and the children of Israel. No Jew, believes in a man god, even though they had the Old Testament.
Genesis 18:1-9 and Exodus 24:9-11 HAHAHAAHHAAHAHHHAHA. God can come into creation
Islam is 😂😂😂
Step one... Re examine the Christian concept of God. Do not proceed until the task is completed and corrected. Jesus is not God!
(Matthew 4:1)
Jesus was tempted (James 1:13)
God cannot be tempted (John
1:29) Jesus was seen (1 John
4:12) No man has ever seen God
(Acts 2:22) Jesus was and is a
man, sent by God (Numbers
23:19, Hosea 11:9) God is not a
man (Hebrews 5:8-9) Jesus had
to grow and learn (saiah 40:28)
God doesn't ever need to learn (1
Corinthians 15:3-4) Jesus Died (1
Timothy 1:17) God cannot die
(Hebrews 5:7) Jesus needed
salvation (Luke 1:37) God doesn't
need salvation (John 4:6) Jesus
grew weary (Isaiah 40:28) God
cannot grow weary (Mark 4:38)
Jesus slept (Psalm 121:2-4) God
God
doesn't sleep (John 5:19) Jesus
wasn't all powerful (Isaiah 45:
5-7) God is all powerful (Mark
13:32) Jesus wasn't all knowing
(Isaiah 46:9) God is all knowing
Please re-read your scriptures
properly Christians. And analyse
the contradictions Jesus (peace
be upon him) was a messenger.
uhh no.. Jesus is God, he claimed to be God, and then he proved it.. it is finished.
No you read the scriptures you posted by copy paste from Islamic websites and see the scriptures you mentioned refute you. Jesus is God almighty
Jesus is salvation
Jesus is the revelation of God
Jesus is coming to judge you
You better read if you care about your eternal soul and where you will spend eternity
A black stone idol in the Kabba called Allah will not save you
Repent while you still can and cry out to Jesus..he's coming and every knee will bow
Go read Myth Maker Paul and the invention of Christianity it’s on pdf for Anyone by Hyam Maccoby
Godlogic lied quite a bit in this discussion. He said Matthew Mark Luke and John wrote their gospels. It's actually anonymous who wrote them. Also there's missing verses in the early manuscripts which suggest that they were later added. If they werent "later added" then why arent they in ANY earlier manuscript. How did they know it was missing?
Bro that was his entire point. We have the early manuscripts. They exist. That was the point. That is what we compare to to know if things were added. He literally said that. And we know who wrote John because he labeled himself in the book. We know who wrote some of Peter because Peter signed his letters. We know who wrote the others because their followers told people who wrote them and passed the knowledge on.
There is a strong transmission of John being the author as well, Iraeneus confirmed it. He was the disciple of Polycarp who was disciple of John
@@1faithchick7that’s actually completely false the earliest manuscripts are Codus sinaitcus, 4th century a lot can happen in 400 years, papias of Hieropolis had earliest excerpts now lost of gospel origins
@@1faithchick7 all Gospels are based off of mark,
@@johnogrady_sorry but you're wrong. Sinaiticus is the oldest complete new testament compilation...there are much older manuscripts out there.
…
How dare you call yourself godlogic? Are you god or logic?
Cringe bro. He isn't calling himself that. He said multiple times in streams he is using the logic God gave him. He is not calling himself God or Logic.
@@1faithchick7 …He is a blasphemous MF….we will put him on the cross at cardburys….ahahahha
typical stupid type comment lol
Romans is not words of God, its words of a man thinking that Jesus is Gods son. Big difference.
Hibdu trimurti is 3 god in 1
Christianity is 3 gods in 1
Whats the difference? Theyre all polytheism
Correction, christianity is ONE God, three persons. One God. Don’t misrepresent it just because you don’t understand it.
What is the difference.. in Hinduism their gods are different beings, they have different natures, their operations are not inseparable and they are separated in space and time (for example one over the sea, one over the sky etc.).. and the main difference, the Trinity which is one God is real while other false gods are not.. did you get it Abdul or not
@@tibouzankor1997 At this point would you expect any better coming from a Muslim?
@@EarlHall-zi4cm
well, you got it right..
all pagan religions share the common belief on Triune Gods.. a grouping of three gods, usually considered to be one in the same being, or different aspects of a single deity as in Trimurty or Trinity or Triple deities.. such triads of three closely associated deities were commonly found throughout the ancient pagans world.
Christians and muslims embrace pagan practices in their religious structures.
Logic if u see this try watching it ..u guys talk a lot of crap on this trinity and Jesus been God nonsense you keep preaching ....your guys don't even belive In God's name Yaweh which means Causes to become.....
All u guys do is make inferences or allusions to God been a trinity something not in the bible ...
Bart Ehrmans own words-Having a few scraps from within a hundred years of when the New Testament was written does not give us what we’d really like to have: complete manuscripts from near the time the authors published their books. If our first reasonably complete copies of the New Testament do not appear until two or three centuries after the books were first put in circulation, that’s two or three hundred years of scribes copying and recopying, making mistakes, multiplying mistakes, changing the text in ways big and small before we have complete copies. We can’t compare these, our oldest surviving copies, with yet older ones to see where their mistakes are. There aren’t any older ones.
And the problems get worse. In later times, when we have an abundance of manuscripts, the copyists of the New Testament were trained scribes-usually monks in monasteries who copied manuscripts as a sacred duty. These monks of the Middle Ages did their level best-most, but not all, of the time-to copy their texts accurately. They sometimes got tired and inattentive and made mistakes; and they sometimes changed the text because they thought it was supposed to be changed. Still, for the most part they did a good job. But that was only much later in Christian history. In the earliest centuries, the vast majority of copyists of the New Testament books were not trained scribes. We know this because we can examine their copies and evaluate the quality of their handwriting, and we can assess how accurately they did their work. The striking and disappointing fact is that our earliest manuscripts of the New Testament have far more mistakes and differences in them than our later ones. The earlier we go in the history of copying these texts, the less skilled and attentive the scribes appear to have been.
Another way to put this: if you take two New Testament manuscripts from around the year 1000 and compare them to one another, they are often very much alike in every verse. But if you do the same thing with the fragmentary copies made around the year 200, you find lots and lots of differences-differences both from the manuscripts of the year 1000 and, more disconcertingly, differences from one another. This tells us that the earliest scribes were not as skilled or assiduous as the later ones. And that’s a problem, because all of our surviving manuscripts were copied from earlier manuscripts, and the earliest copies of all were filled with mistakes. If our earliest known copyists made tons of mistakes, how many mistakes were made by their predecessors, who produced the copies that they copied? We have no way of knowing.
Stop Lying Avery,
You don't know proper English
hahahah no
@@edwardpetrushkevich1893
Keep laughing 🤣😂🤣😂
The ones that don’t know proper English are the moslem translators.
What’s your source? You made a claim now substantiate it. Call me crazy but his English is fine.
@@Diego-uthamanburnttheOGs
well, he can't even answer a simple question 1+1+1= ??
Jesus Christ is God Almighty 😁💯💯💯🙏🙏🙏