I’ve listened to some of your pods in the past kudos on the good work and the interviews you have done. I really liked the majority of this last podcast until the topic changed from the D-Von issue which sounds like it boiled down to a communication issue to switching to a blind side curve ball or fishing expedition into other claims from fans who don’t have to buy a ticket to the shows they produce if they were unhappy with something or disgruntled Indy talents who couldn’t get booked outside of their local area for whatever reason. Dillion is usually pretty quick to survey what’s being said to and about him and then give his side once he reflects upon it. Usually he does it through his personal Facebook account and not through the promotional account. If there is a beef with them professionally because of cutting off the podcast interview or whatever was said to you in the aired context of the previous podcast; dispute those claims if you must that would be totally acceptable. But morally and ethically a personal argument between two family members over personal/professional issues shouldn’t be aired for no reason unless it was agreed upon. And you agreed with Bobby to edit this out and not air it. Yet you went back on your word and aired it anyway. It makes you no different from what Dillion is being accused of and ruins the integrity of your podcast. It would be like you having a family outing and getting into a heated argument over whatever and someone is filming or audio recording the argument for their own personal gain against you. Which in turn would more than likely piss you off and cause tension. From the outside looking in this is a classic example of wrestling family heat where you have Dillion trying to work out of his father’s shadow to run their business with fresh eyes and his younger brother has become a regular wrestler himself. Bobby is trying his best to loosely guide them. When family worsk together it does cause disputes, egos get in the way, and there are teachable moments within these heated exchanges. Which I’m sure they probably reflect on and get over it after a while. Just think if there were live mics taping the Gagne’s, Jarrett’s, or McMahon’s every time there was a business disagreement. It would be close to this. Bottom line we all need to continue to be and do better. I feel there should be apologies all around and just let it go.
Thanks for listening and sharing your opinion. At the end of the day, a som is heard abusing his Cancer Fighting elderly father. Airing this brought to light an issue that is often whispered about. May have saved Bobby's life. Not my responsibility to cover for an abuser.
Did you tell Dillon to respect Bobby by not abusing him? Did you tell Bobby to respect me by not cussing me and by not trashing others on the show? Go do that and then come back to me.
Sadly this is nothing new. I've seen Dillon physically assault Bobby at conventions when Bobby upsets him.
What the heck? Omg.
I’ve listened to some of your pods in the past kudos on the good work and the interviews you have done. I really liked the majority of this last podcast until the topic changed from the D-Von issue which sounds like it boiled down to a communication issue to switching to a blind side curve ball or fishing expedition into other claims from fans who don’t have to buy a ticket to the shows they produce if they were unhappy with something or disgruntled Indy talents who couldn’t get booked outside of their local area for whatever reason. Dillion is usually pretty quick to survey what’s being said to and about him and then give his side once he reflects upon it. Usually he does it through his personal Facebook account and not through the promotional account.
If there is a beef with them professionally because of cutting off the podcast interview or whatever was said to you in the aired context of the previous podcast; dispute those claims if you must that would be totally acceptable.
But morally and ethically a personal argument between two family members over personal/professional issues shouldn’t be aired for no reason unless it was agreed upon. And you agreed with Bobby to edit this out and not air it. Yet you went back on your word and aired it anyway. It makes you no different from what Dillion is being accused of and ruins the integrity of your podcast.
It would be like you having a family outing and getting into a heated argument over whatever and someone is filming or audio recording the argument for their own personal gain against you. Which in turn would more than likely piss you off and cause tension.
From the outside looking in this is a classic example of wrestling family heat where you have Dillion trying to work out of his father’s shadow to run their business with fresh eyes and his younger brother has become a regular wrestler himself. Bobby is trying his best to loosely guide them. When family worsk together it does cause disputes, egos get in the way, and there are teachable moments within these heated exchanges. Which I’m sure they probably reflect on and get over it after a while. Just think if there were live mics taping the Gagne’s, Jarrett’s, or McMahon’s every time there was a business disagreement. It would be close to this.
Bottom line we all need to continue to be and do better. I feel there should be apologies all around and just let it go.
Thanks for listening and sharing your opinion. At the end of the day, a som is heard abusing his Cancer Fighting elderly father. Airing this brought to light an issue that is often whispered about. May have saved Bobby's life. Not my responsibility to cover for an abuser.
Is this legit?
100% legit
What a fool.
This should have Never been aired. You need to Respect Bobby.
Did you tell Dillon to respect Bobby by not abusing him? Did you tell Bobby to respect me by not cussing me and by not trashing others on the show? Go do that and then come back to me.