Welcome Home! (1951)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 жов 2024
- Full title reads: "Welcome Home!"
Princess Elizabeth and Prince Philip arrive home from Canadian and Washington tour.
GV Empress of Scotland tied up alongside docks in Liverpool. CU Name of ship. LV Prince Philip and Princess Elizabeth down gangway. SV Crew waving from ship. SV Elizabeth and Philip with Lord of Derby and Lord Mayor Vere E Cotton. SV Four Mounties on quayside CU Pan two Mounties. SV Lorry load of luggage pan to porters loading lorry. SV Crowd waving. SV E&P waving from Town Hall. GV Elevated Crowd. GV Liverpool Cathedral. SV Choir boy, Geoffrey Bethel presents bouquet. SV Crowd. CU Elizabeth and Philip shaking hands with other dignitaries. LV Elizabeth and Philip with Lord Mayor Vere E Cotton shaking hands with other dignitaries pan up Tower, LV E& P seated on dais listening to bells. SV Top of Cathedral Tower. GV Crowd surges forward LV Royal procession driving down lime Street to station. GV Crowd surging LV Royal couple alight at station and are greeted. CU Royals say goodbye to Mayor. SV Royal couple board train.
LV Queen Elizabeth (later Queen Mother) with Prince Charles and Princess Margaret on Euston station. SV Queen with dignitaries. Charles shakes hands. SV Crowd. SV Royal party. CU Prince Charles talking to Queen, He walks forward to look for train followed by Queen. SV Queen and Prince Charles waiting for train pan up as train into platform. SV Queen and Prince Charles looking on. SV Princess Elizabeth (later Queen Elizabeth II) alight from train followed by Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh. VS of Royal greeting each other Pan to Royal Canadian Mounted Police - Mounties leaving train. SV Elizabeth shaking hands with dignitaries followed by Philip. SV Elizabeth and Queen walk over and shake hands with RCMP Officer, SV Crowd. SV Queen talking to Mounties pan down to Charles. LV Queen and Elizabeth with Charles talking to Mounties. Elizabeth bends down to speak to Charles. CU Mountie saluting and shakes hands with Margaret pan to Elizabeth. SV Elizabeth and Charles walk towards Exit. Charles stops then towards camera and Charles looks towards Mounties. Selected Originals exist for this item - see other records.
FILM ID:1481.2
A VIDEO FROM BRITISH PATHÉ. EXPLORE OUR ONLINE CHANNEL, BRITISH PATHÉ TV. IT'S FULL OF GREAT DOCUMENTARIES, FASCINATING INTERVIEWS, AND CLASSIC MOVIES. www.britishpath...
FOR LICENSING ENQUIRIES VISIT www.britishpath...
British Pathé also represents the Reuters historical collection, which includes more than 136,000 items from the news agencies Gaumont Graphic (1910-1932), Empire News Bulletin (1926-1930), British Paramount (1931-1957), and Gaumont British (1934-1959), as well as Visnews content from 1957 to the end of 1984. All footage can be viewed on the British Pathé website. www.britishpat...
Poor baby Charles has no idea who are these people but he is a very calm child. Seems he does not know his parents arrived.
Elizabeth could and should have picked up Charles and hugged him very much as he deserved this. If his mum did this Charles would NOT be as he was an adult married to Princess Diana. He would have been a good husband but he NEVER received the maternal (and paternal) love and attention he needed and should have had. He was extremely cruel and nasty to Diana as was Camilla. They and Charles' staff did many horrid things to Diana. There was an occasion when Charles and Anne were young children when they sailed on the Britannia with their parents. When they arrived at their destination Charles and Anne were left on board while Elizabeth and Philip disembarked from the ship. At this time it was the birthday of either Charles or Anne but rather than being with their children left them with the ship's crew to watch them while Elizabeth and Philip went to do their plans that were scheduled.
@@anneeversley2405 That is what is confusing to me. I'm watching the first season of the crown and they have portrayed Elizabeth and Philip as involved and affectionate parents but from my knowledge that is far from the truth. There's another video I seen on here where a young Charles was waiting for his mother because she had just come back from being gone for months and instead of hugging him or kissing him on the forehead, she shook his hand as if he was an employee or a stranger. I often wonder did those children even know who their parents were when they were much younger....
King now
@@anneeversley2405 I think he was like he was with Diana because it was arranged marriage. If no love then nothing to do.
@@anneeversley2405 You do not know that he was cruel to Diana because there is no proof of it - only Diana's stories about him. You are merely repeating what she wanted you to believe. She had a victim mentality like Harry.
If you observe Charles at the Queen Mother's funeral you will see the devastated look on his face.. she was everything to him.
Must have been so hard for baby Charles.... whatever the person he became later on, he was excited to meet his parents after such a long time... after all like all the other kids, he would've wanted to be embraced by his parents tho... difficult being a royal kid.
Wonder if they showed him a picture of the Queen before they went to meet her because he looked up to her but didn't recognize who she was !!🤣🤣😂
Elizabeth too faced the same things , at at that age . All royal children face that . Not just Charles
@@irislai7821 Children in that time period were not coddled much, we all were taught manners. I was born in 1946 and I walked around on my own two feet. Parents were dressed in wool clothing that had to be dry cleaned and they wouldn’t want dirty shoes rubbing against the fabric. Besides he looks pretty heavy there and the Queen is tiny and she couldn’t probably pick him up. When I couldn’t walk yet they had a metal stroller that was a bulk ugly thing they pushed me in and in England they had buggies called Prams and they still use them now in England.
@@patsmith5947 bullsht my grandmother and great grandmother were some of the most affectionate people I knew. Just because it is tradition in that family does not make it right. That's why he has so many problems now. It is not normal for a child to not have an emotional connection to their child Tim period has nothing to do with it
@@patsmith5947 She didn't have to pick him up. A simple hug wouldn't have gone amiss!
How sad that the Queen didn't pick up Charles in her Arm's.
Exactly and she didn’t even hold his hand.
Joanne Davis none of his parent hold him. So sad so cold no wonder he grow up as a bitter cold man
It was a different time, parents didn't show feelings. Mostly fathers but then she is the queen. I think she considers it work and her kid is at work so she needs to focus. 😁 I'm a teacher and when i bring my daughter with me, she wants my attention to, but there i have to work and pay attention to the kids. It's not that i don't love and pamper her, but at work I'm at work. I think the queen might have considered it like this. But they say she was cold to the children in general, we'll never know.
@@freespiritable If you look at footages of the Queen at home playing with Charles, she is just a loving mother to him--very playful and warm-- > At work out in teh public, the Queen has to show her work-persona. Very professional, I'd say
@@irislai7821 it's what i was saying. she considers it work, all good.
We can clearly see why he loved his grandmother so much. She was always attentive to him in every video where they appear together. I assume she saw a lot of her husband's mannerisms in her grandson. Elizabeth did a lot better with Andrew and Edward but it sucks for Charles.
😭sad for Charles
thats why he gravitates to camilia shes his mother grandmother put together
@@suzyukla funniest comment lmao😂
@@suzyukla haha
I even read that she tried covering up his affair with Camilla by telling Diana that there was nothing to worry about.
so sad the queen just touched his cheek no hug or embrace or kiss on the cheek or anything and prince phillip either...so cold...the queen mother was very loving with charles...she was his mother..thank god she lived a long time to raise charles....poor kid...and lord manbatton was more of a fahter than prince phillip
Phillip just gave him a quick pat on the head. Glad they were close in the end.
I watched it again, and a few seconds after the initial touch on his cheek, she turns her back to the camera and bends forward to Charles and it does look as though she kisses him.
very sad to see her behaviour towards the child.sad sad sad
@@birdsaloud7590 - Yes, on the head. I got the impression she wanted to hug him so bad, but business was business.
A four minutes footage and we all assumed the worst. People's obsession nowadays with PDA, always wanting to show and prove they love somebody by showering them with kisses and hugs, all in public. Some people do it just for show, all lovey dovey touchy feely in public, but what happened in the privacy of their home, we'll never know
Charles was so cute in the footage. I see that he was trying very hard to follow every thing. He raised his feet to talk to his grandmother with smile,he was going forward to check if the train arrived, he stared his parents after hug. And trying to be with his mother. He was adorable.
And when his mother finally came he didn´t recognise her. His mother just touched his nose and his father just ruffled his hair, no hugs no kisses, so cold. Tragic to see.
No wonder he turned out so WEAK without self-confidence.
@@Nina_Frank I suggest you watch this tape OVER and this time without a pound of hatred in your heart. The Queen kissed Charles at least 3 times, and ruffled his hair, and rubbed his shoulders. We do NOT know what else she was doing when the camera panned away at the time she was interacting with Charles.
SHE ADORES HIM but she was also WORKING in case you didn't notice. Some of those people will NEVER again have a chance to see the Queen up close and they matter also.
Charles and Anne were staying with their grandparents and their aunt while their parents were traveling. (A situation I loved when my parents were on trips.) I did not NEED for my parents to paw over me. I also had my two sets of grandparents and 10 biological aunts and uncles (20 counting all their spouses since my parents were both the babies of their families) to buy me ice cream and read to me and take me to the store, and the fair, and the movies, and to ride their horses, and play with all their dogs. Honestly, kids are NOT crippled by not being pawed over! When you are SURROUNDED BY LOVE you know it. It is NOT NECESSARY to only get "kisses" from mother.
The Queen was 5'4" and weighted just a bit over 100 pounds. She did NOT need to take a chance on falling (just to make YOU happy).
Your thinking that Charles is "weak" PROVES you know ZERO about him. If you dared to be so condescending and nasty to his face, Anne would have YOUR guts for garters.
You see, the "children of Prince Philip" (Charles, Anne, and Edward) KNOW what their father's children are like. And, they would NOT put up with your ignorance.
The Queen Mother was beautiful, warm, strong, smiley and just incredible.
Everyone loved her for a reason. I traveled to London shortly after she died and the grief was very real.
@birdsaloud7590 You have just proven you know NOTHING about her. She was responsible for tearing that family apart. It was Prince Philip and his children (Charles, Anne, and Edward) trying to defend themselves against the Queen Mum, Andrew, and Andrew's father. Sadly, the Queen was afraid of her own mother and refused to defend Philip when the Queen Mum ripped him apart with her verbal abuse. She HATED Philip and did NOT want her daughter to marry him. She was very acquisitive and demanded that her daughter marry Lord Porchester (Porchy) aka Henry Herbert, and future 7th Earl of Carnarvon. The Herbert's own Highclere Castle (aka Downton Abbey) and the Queen Mum (she was the Queen consort then) wanted Elizabeth to marry Porchy, so she would get the Treasures of Tutankhamen (brought back by the 5th Earl) 5,000 acres, and a title of Countess and only 30 miles from Windsor. Elizaeth had bonded with Porchy over horses when she was 13 and he was 15.
Her husband (Good King George VI) was a better judge of character and preferred Philip (though a pauper) over Porchy, because Philip had MUCH better blood line.
This is enough. You need to do some serious study of what went on the past 100 years. But, the Queen Mum is a monster! And a manipulator.
Princess Margaret was just radiant. The bells of Lancaster are just lovely. The Queens brooch is ginormous.
Greeting HM the Queen mother with full respect and appreciation, Prince Philip was really so decent, generous and extemely polite towards his mother in law..I really loved his attitude..
True. He's always been liyal and poilte. But he didn't want her living with them when hus wife became Queen which I understand. The Queen mum was none to give up her prileges and still wanted to be treated as the Queen. So he gently complimented her out. But he would never expose her in public.
@@londiniumcross5122 , The awful way he was treated , I don't think I would have blamed him for exposing her not wanting to take her rightful position!! BEHIND HIM!!!
@@dorothycampbell8635 The Queen Mum was VICIOUS to Philip. She had wanted her daughter to marry Lord Porchester (aka "Porchy," aka Henry Herbert, the future 7th Earl of Carnarvon) who lived at Highclere Castle (aka Downton Abbey) just 30 miles from Windsor. Elizabeth & Henry (Porchy) bonded when she was 13 and he was 15. The Queen Mum was SO acquisitive & wanted the TREASURES of Tutankhamen (that the 5th Earl had brought back), & 5,000 acres, the huge mansion, & title of Countess.
Good King George VI was SMARTER than his greedy wife. He KNEW Philip was a pauper (but had a FAR superior blood line to Porchy. Elizabeth listened to her father & married Philip.
But, when good King George VI died in 1952, the QM went ballistic & EXPLODED & blamed Philip for her reduced lot in life. So, with NO ONE (save Charles & Anne who were 4 and 2 at that time) to protect their father from their nasty grandmother, Philip had NO ONE since the Queen was terrified of confronting her own mother. After 7 years of violent verbal abuse Philip left in early 1959 (to save his sanity) she blamed him for EVERYTHING in the home, government, & her daughter's life; even the economy & the weather.
When Philip left, the QM moved Porchy in & 9 months later, the Queen gave birth to Andrew. The Queen then made "allowances" to Philip (since divorce is not possible in a Monarchy). She would name the child after his parents, either Alice or Andrew. She went against Winston Churchill & created a "cadet" branch of Mountbatten-Windsor, weakening the House of Windsor (new in 1917).
Andrew has to use Mountbatten-Windsor but there isn't a drop of Mountbatten blood in him. Yet, his daughters (Anastasia and Druzella) are stuck with pretending Philip is their grandfather.
Philip was close to Peter, Zara, William, Lady Louise & James, but NOT the York girls, yet they must carry his name.
[The QM DESPISED Philip, but do to her evil machinations, it is now a PERMANENT part of the BRF and House of Windsor. Lord Louis Mountbatten WON & the QM lost, which is DELICIOUS! .
The Queen caused a mess, & Diana (then Harry) blackmailed the Queen for bringing the Monarchy down. Diana figured that if the Queen could have a 2nd son with a lover, so could she. Diana also trashed Charles with years of lies but the Queen was powerless to defend her own son and heir OR Diana would carry out her vile threats. Harry demanded to marry MM (they knew all about her). Harry also demanded the title of Duke (MM wanted to be the same rank as Catherine). Harry a DUKE? He can't even read or write. What an INSULT to the Monarchy! All because of what the Queen did. (She cared more about looking good than being good.) Charles is MUCH more impressive person than his mother.
Poor kid...his parents did not even pay attention to him...he did not know what to do...
I know exactly what the Queen (later the Queen Mother) was thinking when she saw the Mounties: "I think I'll go to Canada for a bit." It is well known that the Queen Mother fell in love with Canada during the tour of 1939 and made many trips to Canada during her life.
Princess Margarets gorgeous velvet coat ❤
I don't believe princess Elizabeth (later queen Elizabeth II) doesn't care about her son. She kissed him and talked to him. she just doesn't show her emotions.
If you've watched the crown you know about the letter Queen Mary, her grandmother sent to her. Royals aren't allowed to show emotion publicly, that's why they seem cold and distant, yet they are human nonetheless. But sometimes, like this, we do see a more relaxed and chilled side of them or a more emotional side. Elizabeth was seen wiping a tear and looking back at something as she was following her husband's coffin in the state car.
Shes a raven mother, i guess
@@melianna999 I don't know... its strange
@@melianna999 We don't see a lot of her at-home footages-- the ones I see show her to be a very different person--very playful with Charles and warm. Royals are not seen crying in public either---look at the royals at Prince Philip's funeral--I guess it's called "control"--which some people don't seem to have, unfortunately !!!!
@@AbdullahB17 THERE IS TIME AND PLACE FOR EVERYTHING--DON'T MIX THEM UP 😂😂🤣 !!!!!
Prince Charles looks so excited...
He looks at his parents like if they are strangers
@@Ozarka636 yes he does, so sad his parent did not hug him..,because the rule maybe...*sorry for my bad english, I hope you know what I mean...
Baby Charles is adorable.
Prince Margaret's outfit is really beautiful . I remember this footage being shown on TV just after Diana's funeral and felt very sorry for Charles here.
Prince?
It’s so cold blooded. However the younger generation seems to be better adjusted and more emotive. I thought the most chilling thing to watch was Prince Phillip. Charles was looking at him for some acknowledgement and after being months away he didn’t even notice his little son. They would have all benefited from long term therapy.
Phillip gave him a quick pat on the head and stepped back.
It was the 1950s. My great grandparents weren't royalty but they held themselves at a distance from their kids and grandkids.
@@suej9329 Prince Philip came from a broken home, he probably didn't know what to do with a baby and might have thought it was not manly to show affection to his son. Poor Phillip and poor Charles!
Prince Charles...so cute...🥰
Yes, I can see his children and grandchildren in him.
He is so cute
Just 71 years later, long live the king!
Amen god and with you
'Just"😂
Prince Charles was such a cute little wee boy 😍How could she not hug him tightly after getting off the train?🙄The Queen Mother offen showed her affection in front of public. So there's no such ridiculous protocols, I guess.
They couldnt show the overly emotional feelings when they were in the public view
Wonder why? Was it all Brits wish to see them as cold fish?
@JR Pacer I believe that too, I don’t understand it, but it definitely looks the case. Perhaps it’s part of some royal protocol to remain aloof at all times, hence no emotions of any kind in public.
If so, I think it’s something they should really rethink, as it just makes them appear cold, distant and uncaring imo. And it’s being carried on right up to today too, although clearly some of the younger royals find it hard to resist and give in to their natural instincts, i.e., I’ve seen candid photos of Zara Philips and even Prince William to name just a few, sneaking a kiss of their child’s cheek/head when they thought no-one was looking!
The only one who seemed to break the tradition in public was Princess Diana. When she ran onto some kind of yacht/ship, to greet the little Princes William and Harry (after being apart from them) with a massive smile and her arms held out high, she hugged and kissed them in view of all the world’s press. But to my knowledge that was the only occasion as she too seemed restrained when you see a lot of other footage/photos of her holding her children. Pity!
Prince Charles was such a calm child lawl. He never even had a tanthrum in public
He also hat to "freeze" his emotions.
Many of us never had a tantrum in public! We were actually raised by parents, not by wolves or "friends" as so many kids these days are.
Auch als Königin und Mutter, egal des Protokolls, hätte sie ihr Kind liebevoll begrüßen und an die Hand nehmen müssen. Auch der Vater. Traurig.
If you give your admire to this queen this mean you give admire to her system and knowledge and beautiful and quite and confedence not mean you give your admire to impire England ..........
Prince Charles is so adorable
O, all the grandsons are like Him and Lady Diana. As babies
ikr
The King was a very cute child.😌
His grandmother queen mother was like a mother to charles that was never a secret. For him she was his mummy
So cold and heartless. Philip just tapped Charles on the head . He could have picked him up but no show of emotions in those days ..
Oh my God you people that want to see the worst. Before Diana all the public footage within the Royals was different. I've seen private home footage where they were all very affectionate with each other.
Not those days, those people!
The fact that most people in the video are dead now.
Apart from the Queen and Prince Charles
Life and death.
Adoreable 2:31 royal prince..
but it wasn't expected.. as a Queen, she might managed her behavior in public but as a mother it seems odd cuz i saw nothing her emotion towarded her baby prince Charles for the first time after long separated.
Prince Charles looked so cute as a kid
True
Looking at the grumpy gray old man he has become today, I would have never pictured him being such an adorable cute little kid!!
I would never describe Charls as "grumpy". He has always been quiet.
Charles was an adorable-looking kid with a full head of hair. He looked a bit like Prince Louis too
@@MandyJMaddison he doesn't look grumpy but his personality sure is
@@mariahyohannes,
I really can't imagine where you got the impression that Charles has a grumpy personality.
He went through six very depressed years, early in his marriage, particularly 1985-early86, when he was in such a state of despair over Diana's conduct that he could hardly speak straight, but other than that, and coping with tragedies and deaths in the family, he has always been a cheerful, but quiet person.
The term "grumpy" doesn't apply.
Vecchio e grigio?! È un signore molto distinto e auguro al signor criticone di invecchiare come lui...
I'm so glad Anne decided not to expose her children to the damage royal life could be. She declined titles for them, rendering them Commoners.
Here Charles is so so much like George. But the difference as George grows will be astounding, because he isn't raised by nannies, yes he has them- a lot of people do now- but he and his family live in a cottage at Windsor, he's almost 9 but only a day boy at school- he may not board ever, unless he chooses. And they're clearly attached to and actively parented by his Mum and Dad. The displays of his younger siblings are proof of that- the antics of Louis at the parade? Very normal, if over stimulated but exhausted 4 year old pushing boundaries with his mummy, whether she's Royalty or not. It's so healthy to see.
Well said it's not like just because you're a young Royal child there's a button to push to avoid exhaustion boredom and meltdowns in public.
she is way, way down on the list so titles or not they would have still been last with very little difference I think
The comment at the end about the "intimacy of this happy family reunion" while the two-and-a-half year old Charles walks on his own, NEITHER parent holding his hand: nothing to do with protocol because his grandmother, the then Queen, was holding his hand when they arrived to wait for the train. Unspeakably cold.
UMM, it's 1950/1951, not some 2023 episode of EastENDERS... British people didn't openly show affection anywhere in public society during those days. Victorian standards of the last century were still very much observed until the mid-1960s, especially in high society.
I like Queen E II very much (without being from the UK nor the Commonwealth) but must say I was struck by her distance and restraint, she didn't even hold his hand, not from what we could see, as Charles looked bewildered and walked with no sense of direction. One would wonder how, not if, it shapes a child and affects how he, in turn, will behave and manage his emotions in adulthood. It's a pity.
What do you like about her? That whole family is narcissistic.
She treats her corgis better than Prince Charles 😬😁
And history revealed us the consequences
RIP the people's princess
R.I..P Prince Philip
So true they’re so cold
@@jorelletaylor5408 Yet when she put her grandsons first after their mother's death in 1997, She was criticized quite badly by her own people. You can't win. On one hand you say they are too cold but when they put emotions first they get savaged in the press.
The queen could have greeted her son with a proper hug and a kiss just as she did with her mom
She did kiss him and hug him. They do not behave like you think they should in public and you only see 2 or 3 minutes at the station. When they got home it was quite different!
@@abbatrouble And you know that how?
Weist ich glaube Charles wurde von ihrer Mutter erzogen und betütelt.
Vielleicht war das auch so abgemacht mit Elisabeth das sie sich auf ihre Zukunft als Königin Vorbereiten konnte. Den es war bekannt das König Georg sehr Krank war.
It's strange how the Queen mother was so demonstrative with her affection yet neither of her daughters were.
Hardly excited ….. no hugs or cuddles .,,. so cold ! !
tehy are reptile, they don't know what is that
Margaret was always a loner. How is that so? With her beauty and looks?
2:51 Elizabeth is a great queen but she has never been a great mother & people still wonder why Charles has mommy issues this boy has never had a mother + im not even gonna talk about prince Philip because I'm so pissed off+RIP Queen mother 🙏🏾🙏🏾
Charles looked bewildered, he seemed don't know much about his obligations , like a curious child looking for his mother. Then look at him now, ambitious.
You just described a young child who eventually grew up to be a man who then knew how to act in public jeez
Philip pet him on the head and gave the Queen space to say hello to her child- The Queen kiss the boy on his cheeks. That's a pretty great reception- at least from the time and to royals. Don't analyze their whole lives to a 5 minuteish video- Stop seeing everything through negative light
Exactly! Can't judge how affectionate she was with her children coming home out in public surrounded by crowds things are done different now. As close as we knew the queen and king were to their daughters even they weren't doing that and nobody said anything
Che freddezza, Elisabetta ,con suo figlio.Con quanto calore Diana riabbracciava i suoi figli,dopo un'assenza.
Lasciamo perdere Diana!
she is so beautiful…..
Creo que se nota que no pasaba mucho tiempo con el.
I'm looking at thousands of dead people.
💐👑Sensacional!!! Parabéns ao canal show SHOW 👏👏👏🙌🌷 obs: Devei ter tradução para entender melhor. Gratidão sempre 🌿🌾🦋
Wow, if I was gone from my son for several months, I probably would have jumped from the train while it was still moving, and ran to my son to hug/kiss him to pieces...and doing all of this while crying. Lol
If you'd done that in 1951, your own mother and the other mothers around you would have told you that coddling and making a fuss over your child was damaging him. He would be spoiled and unable to develop as a normal adult, or so the theory went. How times have changed.
@@christinewolfe5481 So what?
@@SR-iy4gg Most people don't deliberately choose to ignore what the experts say. Building on that, how would you feel if every time your child did something wrong or got a bad grade or messed up, all of your friends and neighbors told you and your child that it wasn't his or her fault, it was yours, because you ruined the kid and made it impossible for kiddo to be normal? Kid gets in trouble at school, your fault, you ruined him. Kid gets bullied, your fault, you ruined him. Over and over it gets pounded into you that you are a bad mother (father) because you damaged your child. That kind of thing tends to be very damaging to your own mental health and your relationship with your child.
Poor Charles...no warmth from his parents whatsoever after being away for so long! No wonder he is the way he is...such a weird family.
The Queen is extremely reserved in public, even with her children.
Family films, which she and the Duke loved to take, show a very different picture of her..
@@MandyJMaddison explain that to a child who hasn't seen his parents in months.
@@MsKaylon1,
In a child's' life, it is not always the parents that provide the warmth, affection and encouragement that the child needs.
That primary bond may be with a different family member entirely.
In the large families of past generations, it was often an older sibling who cared for a little one, once the baby had been weaned. Grandparents also fufilled the role, in any busy household.
@@MandyJMaddison I don't care who provided you with love, it is the love from your parents that you seek most. If you don't get it from your own parents, you assume something is wrong with you. You should know this!
@@MsKaylon1
No-one's parents are perfect. Charles had a very stable existence.
You don't hear Charles complaining that no-one ever cuddled him.
You don't here Charles talking about being so beastly to people that they left their jobs.
You don't here Charles relating how he had slapped his parent's face. .
Charles may not have enjoyed Cordonstoun, but her found useful and practical entertainment for himself .
And at the end of it, passed his exams.
Diana had a seriously dysfunctional childhood.
SO PROUD ,LIVERPOOL WHERE I LIVED AFTER MY ARRIVAL FROM MAURITIUS. THE CITY I LOVE ,WHERE I BECAME A NURSE.1951,THE YEAR OF MY BIRTH.MARVELLOUS.
It's not as bad as people were saying on Facebook. She does kiss him and talk to him. I of course woulda picked him up and hugged him and kissed his little face all over. (I have 2 sons) but I don't think it's as bad as it was made out to be. They're only little once so just try your best not to screw it up, right.
It's so sad When king charles was a kid Queen Elizabeth didn't give much love and attention to him😔 . I'm so glad atleast his sons were raised with full of love ❤️ by their mother
What a load of crap- watch the home movies🤦♀️
Charles kecil anak yg pintar y, ga rewel dan ga liar kek anak nya org2
Some people saying Queen Elizabeth's cold behaviour with baby Charles was normal coming from a Queen but King George VI died the year after, she was still Princess Elizabeth here 🤡. She was always quite awkward towards him and when his siblings were born it got worse. The treatment she gave to them four never seemed equal.
Just watch how the Queen greets Prince Charles after she's been away from him for 6 months! Shockingly cold woman.
thats royal ettiquete. they dont show emotions when in public
I ll bet my grandparents didnt show much emotions to my parents in public either. It was like that back then
It's this lack of empathy and affection is exactly what created the emotionally stunted prince Charles, who grew up to an adult who wasn't emotionally available for Princess Diana and who isn't emotionally available for Prince Harry right now, when he needs it the most.
Generational emotional trauma
@@martschwartz4958 Actually that would have changed in King Edward VIII. To bad the British establishment could stomach the thought of "love is love" and the idea of a man treating a woman as his equal.
People weren't publicly demonstrative in public then. As a grown-up I remember watching some sitcom from the 80s where dad comes down to breakfast and kisses his son as well as his daughter. I thought how that would have embarrassed me as a kid. At the same time we never doubted that our parents loved us.
Traurig, wenn so ein kleines Kind wie verlassen neben seinen Eltern steht.
Ich hoffe, daß zu Hause dann alles zur Begrüßung in Herzlichkeit nachgeholt wurde.
The 1950s were such a great time for women's fashion.
Как же приятно и восхитительно прикоснутся к истории 😍😘👏👏👏👏💐💐💐🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹
Poor charles. Elizabeth didnt even hold his hands n lil charles keep looking at his mom.
Oh good God you don't know what she did when they got home. When have you ever seen the queen overly affectionate in public?
Who are you ? Oh right..your my mum
Prince Charles and his 2 sons take wives that are older than themselves. Somehow the 3 men look for their mother, so it seems. Im not psychologist or something. Just old granny who loves the RF.
I have an awful relationship with my mother. All of my relationships have been with older women.
Kate is all of five months older than William; Camilla is a year older than Charles; Meghan is three years older than Harry. Those are all well within the normal age band for contemporaries: Kate and William were in the same year of school, for example. Five months older does not a mother make.
@@christinewolfe5481 It is certain type of man. I am 6 months older than my husband. We met in high school.
But I should look than for husband in primary school.😂 Younger the better.
@@christinewolfe5481 "5 MONTHS older does not a mother make "--but 3 years older does ?? !!!!!🤣🤣🤣😋😋😋😋
@@irislai7821 : Not by my book. I specifically stated that Meghan being three years older than Harry was "well within the normal age band for contemporaries." Did you have trouble understanding?
Wasn’t the Queen’s father the Duke of York (not Lancaster) before he became King?
the King had many titles.
When you are in the area where your title came from, you have to use that title.
The Duchy of Lancaster is the landed estate that provides revenue for the king, so "Duke of Lancaster" is a title informally given to whomever is monarch at the time (the present Queen even today is sometimes called "Duke of Lancaster" within the historic county boundaries of Lancashire, which includes Liverpool where this film begins). However, there hasn't legally been a Duke of Lancaster in more than 600 years, and you are correct that George VI was Duke of York before he took the throne.
Everything Christine Wolfe has said is correct. I just want to add that the Queen is now the Duke of Lancaster, and when she visits the Channel Islands, she does so as the Duke of Normandy.
Prince Charles, in Scotland, is the Duke of Rothesay and Lord of the Isles.
Imagine they didn’t ever have transportation accidents and lived over 90. Oh wow.
Poor little Charles. His grandpa became ill and his mother had to take over. At least there were gifts for Charles and Anne.
This is the Queen coming back from Canada after five weeks. Not Malta. She did go for a few months at a time to be with Philip there. I would imagine it a security risk and not the best setting for a kid who could be well looked after back home. She kisses Charles on the head and then gets on with her job. She even guides Charles. She was not going to pick him up. He’s too big nor did he seem to expect it. She’s on display as heir.
1:43 one of the identic gestures of the queen
Для королевы-матери Чарлз был как поздний ребёнок, поэтому она была вся в нем. Ну и времена были другие, скорее всего в дали от камер сына затискали за щечки как пупсика.
❤️
They were strange as parents. Poor little Charles
Carlos como que no los reconoce, se suponia que estas giras duraban 6 meses, entonces, tan pequeñito, no los registra, y encima que sin videollamadas, menos. Ellos siempre trabajaban mucho y estaban pendiente de eso, era la reina madre la que mimaba a Carlos.
Actually, yes, it doesn't look like she was ver attentive to her son. But if you look closely, she always made sure where he was standing.
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II is a legend
Very germanic and British in their upbringing. No affection, very formal. Charles never had affection and never really had a mother. His father was a bully and cold . Diana was too needy for him
Camilla is his mother who babies him and also could be his father in the looks dept.
What a cute adorable little Prince 🤴 😍 💕 Long Live His Majesty King Charles III ❤ 💙 ♥ 💖 🙏
Charles so beauty child .
Prince Harry mostdefinitely is his father the king s son
@maresabruiners5199 Harry is NO relation to King Charles! That is a terrible insult! Charles is wonderful and Harry is a dunce. He can't even read or write. He was a FAKE student and a FAKE soldier. They gave him uniforms and he was supposed to stay out of trouble.
Diana had Harry from an affair she had with her riding instructor. THANK HEAVEN the dunce is no relation to Prince Philip.
Was that a freakin‘ chicken there in the end
La reina ni lo besaba ni lo acariciaba ni lo llevaba de su mano, pobre Carlos!🥴
La Reyna como si el niño fuera de una vecina..... . tan chiquito Carlos.....
1950's fashion 😍🤩
Charles this is your mommy
O Príncipe Charles era bonitinho quando criança rsrs ... mas o pessoal da alteza não perdoava os animaizinhos... podemos perceber pelas estolas da mãe da Rainha...
She was a terrible mother
I got 4 min into this and can’t watch this crap anymore. Listing off every time they left the kids (with their grandmother) and accusing a working woman of not putting her kids first? Are you going to do a special on how queen Elizabeth went on a 6 MONTH TRIP when Charles and Anne were 2 and
pobre hijo cuanta frialdad de sis padres
Aw sha ❤, sweet little guy
Historically, the royals never raised their own children. The children often cared more for their nannies.
Damn this is just sad for Charles. I'm glad he and Diana were better parents to their kids. And now William & Harry are doing the same as well.
Oh God you don't know if she was different in private. As a matter of fact I've seen of some of footage from private home videos where she was very affectionate with both of those children. Even in one she's helping Charles give Prince Philip a medal. That's the way things were done and tell Diana did different.
People from Elizabeth II's generation, our grandparents and great-grandparents were also like that with their children.
Il avait vraiment l’air mignon ce petit gosse
1951 - so lovely to see this now King Charles is on the throne
📹🇧🇷💭Aí que medo que não tenho imagens da vida de pessoas mais importantes que essas e as outras famílias tbm não tem pra os futuros descendentes virem . 😭📹🇧🇷🇧🇷
Seeing that little boy prance around and realizing he’s now the King of Britain
¿Por qué no abrazar? ¿Por qué no dar un beso?
Royalty are not allowed to touch their offspring
where is king george vi?
dead
@@onytha99 in 1951?
Shouldn’t it have been the first time for them encounter each other that day? Shouldn’t the Princess have curtseyed to the Queen when she got off the train?