Seriously. I watched two other players ignore the urza player combo-ing off because I played out one creature with infect. He won two turns later because his pieces were left on the board and they spent all their resources blowing up everything I had.
Solid video. Threat assessment is the number 1 way I see games handed to the wrong people, and it's from every skill level of player so this is super important information. One thing that I have found myself over the years is a healthy conversation promotes somewhat healthy threat assessment - too much talking will always skew how people view the game and so very often result in someone doing the wrong thing whether it's too much or too little. It's hard to know exactly what is enough when it comes to communicating with opponents but like anything with a game of skill it takes practice.
Rewatching this I realized that for a deck to fly under the radar of all opponents and not be perceived as a threat, you want that deck to... - play unknown cards - play unknown combos - not play to the board too heavily - grind value slowly - accumulate value in hand or graveyard - win without big payoff spells ....or to put it simply: Play Tayam 😂💀
No such thing as threat assessment. It’s whatever a player doesn’t like it gets removed. Even if the two other players are completely fine with it, one player will go out the way to destroy whatever is inconvenient for the them.
I love the "threats undetected" as the back ground picture .
@@roberth2833 first one to notice 🤓
Expecting edh players to have decent threat assessment is like expecting it to snow in hell.
@@robertmendez8383 maybe this video helps to make hell freeze over
@@EisenherzMTG Quite the task to try your hand at
Seriously. I watched two other players ignore the urza player combo-ing off because I played out one creature with infect. He won two turns later because his pieces were left on the board and they spent all their resources blowing up everything I had.
Solid video. Threat assessment is the number 1 way I see games handed to the wrong people, and it's from every skill level of player so this is super important information.
One thing that I have found myself over the years is a healthy conversation promotes somewhat healthy threat assessment - too much talking will always skew how people view the game and so very often result in someone doing the wrong thing whether it's too much or too little. It's hard to know exactly what is enough when it comes to communicating with opponents but like anything with a game of skill it takes practice.
Yes yes yes. Not talking is never right, but so is chewing someones ear off^^
🔥 🔥 🔥
Don’t tell a lot about RoSi 😂😂😂😂😂
Rewatching this I realized that for a deck to fly under the radar of all opponents and not be perceived as a threat, you want that deck to...
- play unknown cards
- play unknown combos
- not play to the board too heavily
- grind value slowly
- accumulate value in hand or graveyard
- win without big payoff spells
....or to put it simply: Play Tayam 😂💀
I'd say tayam does all of this so well that is goes around and people always look at you 😂
We're bringing Orvar back baby 😎 No one knows what any of my useless twiddles do
@matticus_p626 put a clockspin on the stack and I'm handcuffing you to the wall
@@baamxxv63 I once used clockspinning to kill a devoted druid with swift reconfig on the stack. Better get the cuffs ready :)
What about rhystic study threat ? The real menace of the format haha
Pay sometimes, you don’t have to every time. People are insane these days.
No such thing as threat assessment. It’s whatever a player doesn’t like it gets removed.
Even if the two other players are completely fine with it, one player will go out the way to destroy whatever is inconvenient for the them.
@@sotovido7808 ?