As someone who has studied neoDarwinism for nearly 50 years, I can vouch for the accuracy of Gunter's presentation here. ..It's past time to abandon the Darwinian mythology.
Is that why he does no research and consequently publishes nothing in any respectable science journal any more. Is that why he works for a christian propaganda mill instead?
I mean, we had one single-celled life form, and suddenly jumped to a multi-celled life form... If evolution was gradual, we should have two-celled life forms, three-celled life forms, and so on.... We don't even have eight-celled life forms 😅😅😅 We only have single cells living in colonies....
organisms will tend to have been buried according to their location, i.e., sea floor first, and their mobility/ability to escape the deluge of sediment. Also removes the millions of years from the geologic column
as with most things in life, the answer is never simple or a simple binary. Evolutionary biology seems like the answer but has a lot key issues it does not explain information. Religion explains the information and purpose of life but does not tell you how things were created. We all need the Lord and thus have to look for him
David Berlinski stated years ago when he was a wavering agnostic/atheist, and after investigating Darwinism from a mathematical viewpoint, "In the context that realistically portrays it for what it is: a kind of amusing 19th century collection of anecdotes that is utterly unlike anything we see in the serious sciences." "Here are some points you should consider as well: one, the theory doesn't have any substance. Two, it's preposterous. Three, it's not supported by the evidence." "David Berlinski: Rebelious Intellectual Defies Darwinism" (UA-cam, spelling original, "The Incorrigible David Berlinski"). Refarding the Cambrian: he more or less states "it was the sudden emergence of species with no obvious predecessors: we've looked exhaustively for said predecessors.'
As someone who has studied neoDarwinism for nearly 50 years, I can vouch for the accuracy of Gunter's presentation here.
..It's past time to abandon the Darwinian mythology.
This man definitely needs to be on every large podcast out there
*Everything explodes onto the scene with nothing before it and no link to anything after it.*
Sounds like my ADHD mind 🤔🤷♀️😂
Günter knows his stuff.
Is that why he does no research and consequently publishes nothing in any respectable science journal any more. Is that why he works for a christian propaganda mill instead?
Excellent video! Enjoyed it.
Excellent content.
Hello Discovery Institute, more Gunter Bechly please.
Thank you for promoting Intelligence.
You surly are in dire need of some if you think this is science.
Mutations degrade the already existing information.
I've never seen a squirrel turn into a rabbit
And you never will...you also will never come up with such dribble if you'd now the first thing about evolution.
@@DavidvanVeen-v4p Yes, the first thing is that microbe-to-man evolution is a myth.
Great talk that covers the key facts of life on Earth and how they clearly support intelligent design over evolution.
great video
I mean, we had one single-celled life form, and suddenly jumped to a multi-celled life form... If evolution was gradual, we should have two-celled life forms, three-celled life forms, and so on.... We don't even have eight-celled life forms 😅😅😅 We only have single cells living in colonies....
Thank you for this educational video!
If the layers are the result of the flood what are the implications?
The implication is that Roto-Rooter did not come into existence soon enough
that the flood was massive
organisms will tend to have been buried according to their location, i.e., sea floor first, and their mobility/ability to escape the deluge of sediment. Also removes the millions of years from the geologic column
That the flood was local and the earth is about 4.6 BYO
Nice!
My guy!!!
I didn't realize Devin Townsend was a fossil expert.
Rock star
Also does Evolutionary Biology disprove Noah's Ark and Adam and Eve? If so is all religion just a scam or based on myths?
They are scams based on Mythology.
as with most things in life, the answer is never simple or a simple binary. Evolutionary biology seems like the answer but has a lot key issues it does not explain information. Religion explains the information and purpose of life but does not tell you how things were created. We all need the Lord and thus have to look for him
David Berlinski stated years ago when he was a wavering agnostic/atheist, and after investigating Darwinism from a mathematical viewpoint, "In the context that realistically portrays it for what it is: a kind of amusing 19th century collection of anecdotes that is utterly unlike anything we see in the serious sciences."
"Here are some points you should consider as well: one, the theory doesn't have any substance. Two, it's preposterous. Three, it's not supported by the evidence." "David Berlinski: Rebelious Intellectual Defies Darwinism" (UA-cam, spelling original, "The Incorrigible David Berlinski").
Refarding the Cambrian: he more or less states "it was the sudden emergence of species with no obvious predecessors: we've looked exhaustively for said predecessors.'