Numerical Types in Mathematica & Wolfram Language

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 чер 2024
  • Mathematica Essentials - the first PRO COURSE from Socratica
    Buy here: www.socratica.com/courses/mat...
    Learn along with free Mathematica notebooks available on github:
    github.com/socratica/wolfram
    𝙒𝘼𝙉𝙏 𝙈𝙊𝙍𝙀? snu.socratica.com/mathematica
    Mathematica and the Wolfram Language have built in support for the 4 main types of numbers: integers, rational numbers, real numbers, and complex numbers. You do not need to import any external libraries, or worry about size limitations. Everything just works. In this lesson, we will introduce the numerical types, show you some useful keyboard shortcuts, determine how far you can push your computer, and more.
    ✷✷✷
    MATHEMATICA ESSENTIALS by Socratica
    Numerical Types
    You can jump to sections in the video here:
    0:00 What are the 4 numerical types in Mathematica
    0:52 Integers
    1:48 Rational Numbers
    2:44 Real Numbers
    3:42 Complex Numbers
    4:47 Numerical Size Limits
    ✷✷✷
    We recommend the following (affiliate links):
    The Wolfram Language
    amzn.to/3D4jqvz
    The Mythical Man Month - Essays on Software Engineering & Project Management
    amzn.to/2tYdNeP
    Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and Its Consequences
    amzn.to/2ri1nf7
    Mindset by Carol Dweck
    amzn.to/2q9y8Nj
    How to Be a Great Student (our first book!)
    ebook: amzn.to/2Lh3XSP
    Paperback: amzn.to/3t5jeH3
    Kindle Unlimited: amzn.to/3atr8TJ
    ✷✷✷
    If you find our work at Socratica valuable, please consider becoming our Patron on Patreon!
    / socratica
    If you would prefer to make a one-time donation, you can also use
    Socratica Paypal
    www.paypal.me/socratica
    We also accept Bitcoin! Our address is:
    bc1qda47tgfyk67lxa7yqn8y5m02hjcglghsd5c58n
    ✷✷✷
    Written & Produced by Michael Harrison & Kimberly Hatch Harrison
    Edited by Megi Shuke
    About our Instructors:
    Michael earned his BS in Math from Caltech, and did his graduate work in Math at UC Berkeley and University of Washington, specializing in Number Theory. A self-taught programmer, Michael taught both Math and Computer Programming at the college level. He applied this knowledge as a financial analyst (quant) and as a programmer at Google.
    Kimberly earned her BS in Biology and another BS in English at Caltech. She did her graduate work in Molecular Biology at Princeton, specializing in Immunology and Neurobiology. Kimberly spent 16+ years as a research scientist and a dozen years as a biology and chemistry instructor.
    Michael and Kimberly Harrison co-founded Socratica.
    Their mission? To create the education of the future.
    ✷✷✷
    Welcome to Socratica! We make SMART videos focusing on STEM - science, math, programming. Subscribe here: bit.ly/SocraticaSubscribe
    PLAYLISTS
    Study Tips bit.ly/StudyTipsPlaylist
    Python programming bit.ly/PythonSocratica
    SQL programming bit.ly/SQL_Socratica
    Chemistry bit.ly/Chemistry_Playlist
    Abstract Algebra bit.ly/AbstractAlgebra
    Astronomy bit.ly/AstronomySocratica
    Biology bit.ly/BiologySocratica
    Calculus bit.ly/CalculusSocratica
    Geometry bit.ly/GeometrySocratica
    Mathematica bit.ly/SocraticaMathematica
    Theme: Cody Martin Arcadia OKKBZUP7GPH92B15
    Cody Martin The Grid 0KFW6TJ3YEF0ORUL
    #Mathematica #Wolfram #WolframLanguage

КОМЕНТАРІ • 30

  • @Socratica
    @Socratica  8 місяців тому

    Mathematica Essentials - the first PRO COURSE from Socratica
    Buy here: www.socratica.com/courses/mathematica-essentials

  • @Insightfill
    @Insightfill Рік тому +6

    This is awesome. I used to teach and support Mathematica at a high school in ~1992 and it was SO FUN to just explore problems with it.
    My favorite: given a metal washer which has been curved into an arc over a cylinder, and knowing the height and width of the washer (as, perhaps, if it's resting on a table), calculate the radius of the original cylinder.

    • @Socratica
      @Socratica  Рік тому +1

      So great for things like this!! Just an amazing tool for helping us be curious about math.

  • @Insightfill
    @Insightfill Рік тому +2

    Well, now I have to get Mathematica again! I miss this program!

  • @jagadishgospat2548
    @jagadishgospat2548 Рік тому +8

    Wow i needed help with mathematica rn, thanks guys.

    • @Socratica
      @Socratica  Рік тому +2

      Hooray! We love a good coincidence.

  • @murphygreen8484
    @murphygreen8484 Рік тому +2

    Looking forward to this series! Thank you.

    • @Socratica
      @Socratica  Рік тому +1

      Thank you for your encouragement! We have such fun using this program.

  • @sghuisman
    @sghuisman Рік тому

    Very nice! thanks for sharing!

  • @victoria001av
    @victoria001av Рік тому +1

    Excellent!!! #education #acience.#developer #programming

  • @ankitkherimasania2987
    @ankitkherimasania2987 Рік тому

    Bhut Acha smaj aa gya

  • @ankitkherimasania2987
    @ankitkherimasania2987 Рік тому

    Mam you teach very well

  • @subramanianvk8289
    @subramanianvk8289 Рік тому

    Please post, a series of videos on mathematics.

  • @carlosalexandreFAT
    @carlosalexandreFAT Рік тому

    The association of the main numbers in the field of mathematics with each other, reflects numerical sequences that correspond to the dimensions of the Earth, the Moon, and the Sun in the unit of measurement in meters, which is: 1' (second) / 299792458 m/s (speed of light in a vacuum).
    Ramanujan number: 1,729
    Earth's equatorial radius: 6,378 km.
    Golden number: 1.61803...
    • (1,729 x 6,378 x (10^-3)) ^1.61803 x (10^-3) = 3,474.18
    Moon's diameter: 3,474 km.
    Ramanujan number: 1,729
    Speed of light: 299,792,458 m/s
    Earth's Equatorial Diameter: 12,756 km. Earth's Equatorial Radius: 6,378 km.
    • (1,729 x 299,792,458) / 12,756 / 6,378) = 6,371
    Earth's average radius: 6,371 km.
    The Cubit
    The cubit = Pi - phi^2 = 0.5236
    Lunar distance: 384,400 km.
    (0.5236 x (10^6) - 384,400) x 10 = 1,392,000
    Sun´s diameter: 1,392,000 km.
    Higgs Boson: 125.35 (GeV)
    Phi: 1.61803...
    (125.35 x (10^-1) - 1.61803) x (10^3) = 10,916.97
    Circumference of the Moon: 10,916 km.
    Golden number: 1.618
    Golden Angle: 137.5
    Earth's equatorial radius: 6,378
    Universal Gravitation G = 6.67 x 10^-11 N.m^2/kg^2.
    (((1.618 ^137.5) / 6,378) / 6.67) x (10^-20) = 12,756.62
    Earth’s equatorial diameter: 12,756 km.
    The Euler Number is approximately: 2.71828...
    Newton’s law of gravitation: G = 6.67 x 10^-11 N.m^2/kg^2. Golden number: 1.618ɸ
    (2.71828 ^ 6.67) x 1.618 x 10 = 12,756.23
    Earth’s equatorial diameter: 12,756 km.
    Planck’s constant: 6.63 × 10-34 m2 kg.
    Circumference of the Moon: 10,916.
    Gold equation: 1,618 ɸ
    (((6.63 ^ (10,916 x 10^-4 )) x 1.618 x (10^3)= 12,756.82
    Earth’s equatorial diameter: 12,756 km.
    Planck's temperature: 1.41679 x 10^32 Kelvin.
    Newton’s law of gravitation: G = 6.67 x 10^-11 N.m^2/kg^2.
    Speed of Sound: 340.29 m/s
    (1.41679 ^ 6.67) x 340.29 - 1 = 3,474.81
    Moon's diameter:: 3,474 km.
    Cosmic microwave background radiation
    2.725 kelvins ,160.4 GHz,
    Pi: 3.14
    Earth's polar radius: 6,357 km.
    ((2,725 x 160.4) / 3.14 x (10^4) - (6,357 x 10^-3) = 1,392,000
    The diameter of the Sun: 1,392,000 km.
    Numbers 3, 6 & 9 - Nikola Tesla
    One Parsec = 206265 AU = 3.26 light-years = 3.086 × 10^13 km.
    The Numbers: 3, 6 and 9
    ((3^6) x 9) - (3.086 x (10^3)) -1 = 3,474
    The Moon's diameter: 3,474 km.
    Now we will use the diameter of the Moon.
    Moon's diameter: 3,474 km.
    (3.474 + 369 + 1) x (10^2) = 384,400
    The term L.D (Lunar Distance) refers to the average distance between the Earth and the Moon, which is 384,400 km.
    Moon's diameter: 3,474 km.
    ((3+6+9) x 3 x 6 x 9) - 9 - 3 + 3,474 = 6,378
    Earth's equatorial radius: 6,378 km.
    Orion: The Connection between Heaven and Earth eBook Kindle

  • @ankitkherimasania2987
    @ankitkherimasania2987 Рік тому

    When I am confused, I come to view your lecture

  • @lien3729
    @lien3729 Рік тому

    python do have complex numbers built in, only "j" is used instead of "i" try this "5+4j" or "complex(5, 4)" (without quote)
    also there is a complex version of the math module "cmath" (nothing to do with C/C++)

    • @Socratica
      @Socratica  Рік тому +2

      Python easily comes the closest with support for complex numbers and even a fractions module. There are some underlying implementation oddities with Python, mostly because it uses C and float standards which complicates working with rational numbers.

  • @beachboardfan9544
    @beachboardfan9544 Рік тому +2

    Whats the etymology of integer? Why not just say whole number? Nothing about 'integer' sounds like it means whole of something...

    • @Socratica
      @Socratica  Рік тому +3

      That would be a fun exploration! We think it's related to "tangible" - as in something untouched and whole.

  • @miguelchagas.-.
    @miguelchagas.-. Рік тому

    Volta com o Socratica Português por favor

  • @RodrigoNishino
    @RodrigoNishino Рік тому

    Lit

  • @RGAstrofotografia
    @RGAstrofotografia Рік тому +1

    Nice! But the rational number and the real number are really the same, only written in a different format.

    • @Socratica
      @Socratica  Рік тому +2

      Actually, there are infinitely more real numbers than rational numbers. The canonical example of a real number that is *not* a rational number is Sqrt[2].

    • @RGAstrofotografia
      @RGAstrofotografia Рік тому +1

      @@Socratica still, Mathematica can't write any real number that is not rational, only an approximation that is rational.

    • @Socratica
      @Socratica  Рік тому +5

      Actually, it can. By using expressions such as Sqrt[2] or Pi, it treats these numbers with infinite precision. Only when you want to display an approximate number of digits does it return a rational approximation. It's quite impressive at it's ability to work with non-rational real numbers. You can even do integrals with irrational bounds of integration and the result, whenever theoretically possible, is an exact mathematical expression.
      Edit: This is why when you enter an expression like Sqrt[2]*Pi it returns Sqrt[2]*Pi, because this expression represents an exact value.

    • @wjmoore425425
      @wjmoore425425 Рік тому

      @@Socratica This was very unclear in the video. You need to address the notation which allows expression of real numbers because everything that was said is completely decimal centric without being explicit.

  • @JuanPabloCarbajal
    @JuanPabloCarbajal Рік тому

    close source sfotware? really... being there some many good stuff, e.g: Sympy, Julia

  • @ankitkherimasania2987
    @ankitkherimasania2987 Рік тому

    Aap hamare liye avatar ho

  • @theultimatereductionist7592

    I used and loved Mathematica, but I had it only when I was a graduate student. When I returned to school, later, I had Maple for 2 years. But those student licenses expired. They got me Mathematica and Maple for $129 or something less, each.
    So, for my own independent research, I have tried to learn Python on my own. Just incredibly hard writing one's own code.
    For example, I have never learned TeX/LaTeX and I will absolutely positively never waste my precious time here on earth trying to learn that absolute worthless garbage ever again. I tried 12 times since 1988. Literally insane to make up random incomprehensible code to typeset when one can easily instantly click and drag symbols with Mathtype into an MS Word document.

  • @kienappel
    @kienappel Рік тому +2

    this.forward(*everyone_from_uni*)