Big Old PRATT and WHITNEY ENGINES Cold Straing Up and Sound

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 вер 2024
  • T-SHIRT LINK:
    teespring.com/...
    This video features Big Old PRATT and WHITNEY ENGINES Cold Straing Up and Sound. If you wanna see some big old airplane engines start watch this video and if you like the video hit the like button and SUBSCRIBE
    SUBSCRIBE: / @cartestchannel90
    Thanks to all of you, our fans for your support and for sending your videos. We can help you and promote your channels with links in the video and description, and we can create this beautiful and great content which you all love so much. We are one big team and I hope this cooperation will be bigger and stronger. Everybody who wants to help us and everybody who wants to promote his own channel can send videos to our email: cartestchannel@gmail.com
    We want to keep most of the original sound in videos so there is no music or voice comments in videos. You can enjoy original engine sounds. Hope you like the videos :)

КОМЕНТАРІ • 60

  • @roadrunner4404
    @roadrunner4404 3 роки тому +4

    There is something pleasing about these old radials . The history is fantastic.

  • @darrellborland119
    @darrellborland119 3 роки тому +5

    What a symphony of mechanical intrigue...thanks.

  • @cartestchannel90
    @cartestchannel90  3 роки тому +27

    Do you like these PRATT and WHITNEY ENGINES ?

  • @normfreilinger5655
    @normfreilinger5655 3 роки тому +6

    I can’t imagine an old aircraft carriers deck loaded with these planes running !

  • @davelowets
    @davelowets Рік тому

    0:55 That guy is NUTS to be standing right behind the prop like that. One stumble backwards, and his life is over in the blink of an eye.. 😳

  • @IamScoHo
    @IamScoHo 2 роки тому +3

    "Is that normal?". Yeah, me trying to start a dual carb straight 6 240z in the winter. Let alone a 70+ year old 12-18 cylinder engine.

    • @magnatron7734
      @magnatron7734 2 роки тому +1

      Hitachi su one barrel side draft lol

    • @mikearakelian6368
      @mikearakelian6368 Рік тому +1

      Ignition booster last about 15 hrs...I had box's of them for my R 20007m2 so replaced them often...big thing with all radials is hydro lock! I always removed lower plugs n drained cylinders if plane sat for more than 3 days; pulled props through at least 8 blades backwards...never had a lock n engines ran to TBO.i worked on engines 5 days a week...mostly little things.dont let others fly your bird; that's when you get cracked cylinders( #1)...or oily wheel wells messy cargo area...

  • @geoffreybradford
    @geoffreybradford 3 роки тому

    love these sounds of course, but those backfires.....woooowee!!

  • @munawarazad413
    @munawarazad413 3 роки тому

    Good to have presented old powerful piston type aero engine history , showing foundation of Aviation.

  • @BravoActual4756
    @BravoActual4756 3 роки тому +6

    Keep it on the stand and that's the best weed wacker I've ever seen.

  • @Rickster5176
    @Rickster5176 3 роки тому +3

    That's the way God intended airplanes to sound.

  • @timmayer8723
    @timmayer8723 3 роки тому +1

    The US fighter planes flying against the '0' we're powered by various large radials such as the 2800, 3300 and various in line 16 cylinder high performance engines. The R-4360 PW 28 cylinder was tried in the F4U corsair and the P-47 thunder bolt. None worked out.The PW 4360 ended up powering large AF cargo planes and most famously Howard Hugh's monstrous 8 engine troop carrier 'the Spruce Goose '.

  • @gazratjackson
    @gazratjackson 2 роки тому

    Straing em up bro 🦘

  • @charlescutillo2593
    @charlescutillo2593 3 роки тому

    Awesome plane heavy hitter.

  • @Farazknowlegist
    @Farazknowlegist 3 роки тому +10

    I didnt know that hawker fury is powered by PW. I think thats Centaurus

    • @klesmer
      @klesmer 3 роки тому +3

      Easiest way to tell is the propeller. Centaurus had 5 blade props that in good British manner rotated in the wrong direction.

    • @johnkoelsch5030
      @johnkoelsch5030 3 роки тому +2

      The Hawker Sea Furies were originally equipped with the Bristol Centaurus sleeve valve engine....probably parts have become scare and maintenance of all that “monkey-motion” of the sleeves, as well as the horrendous increase of friction of sleeves turning against already moving pistons make them very impractical...at the Reno Air Races, notice that almost all Furies are equipped with Wright R-3350’s ( the same engine that powered the B-29) ...the first series of R-3350’s were terribly unreliable due to substandard machining and assembly...so in that instance, early to mid 1945 the Bristol was a far better and more powerful engine than the Wright...so be it, by the mid 1950’s the fuel injected Wright R-3350’s became reliable...their top end oiling problems were solved and dropping/sucking valves were a thing of the past...tragic that Wright wantonly abandoned US airmen in their B-29’s

    • @klesmer
      @klesmer 3 роки тому +1

      @@johnkoelsch5030 You are preaching to the choir. I have been a huge fan of the Centaurus for years. What put them to pasture were jets. Yes the 3350 became a great engine after years of trial and error. In spite of the monkey motion of the sleeve drives the big Bristol sleeve valves were reliable right from the beginning. Their biggest drawback was oil consumption, which could probably be cured with modern material's and CNC machining. You are right about parts and qualified techs to maintain them, it is just makes more sense to use what is available to keep the Furie's flying. PS. Nothing sounds like a Centaurus at full power.

    • @vumba1331
      @vumba1331 3 роки тому

      @@klesmer The propeller did not rotate in the wrong direction, it was left arc like other later engines that they made, e.g. RR Griffon, they were standardising on that rotation when jets came along. The Soviets did the same with Klimov V12 and a couple of their radials.

    • @darrellborland119
      @darrellborland119 3 роки тому +1

      @@johnkoelsch5030 yes, John...as recent historians have pointed out, apparently more airmen lost their lives to those Wright's...number 17 cylinder would eat an exhaust valve...with fire as a result, than due to enemy action.Thanks.

  • @chrissmith7669
    @chrissmith7669 3 роки тому

    A wonderful sound.

  • @joeyramnarine214
    @joeyramnarine214 Рік тому +1

    Is it just me or the title literally says straing up 🤣

  • @mikearakelian6368
    @mikearakelian6368 3 роки тому +4

    Wonder how many starter motors these guys burn up on starting? No break in the start

    • @rrknl5187
      @rrknl5187 3 роки тому +3

      They're designed for extended cranking, usually 30 seconds of continuous cranking then 1 minute of rest.

    • @timmayer8723
      @timmayer8723 3 роки тому +3

      Mike Arakelian I worked on P&W R4360 engines while in the Air Force. 28 cylinders 4360 cu. In. Capable of over 3500 hp in the WEP (war emergency power setting), turbo charged, alcohol injection. During four years on the flight line I had changed only one starter. I was surprised how compact they were. On the other hand each of the 28 cylinders had two large spark plugs for a total of 56 plugs. It was an 8 hour job for one man to change all 56 plugs. Because of their weight these engines were used in cargo planes such as the C-97 four engine aircraft. They were also used on the Howard Hugh's Spruce Goose which had six engines.

    • @davef.2811
      @davef.2811 3 роки тому +1

      @@timmayer8723 Hughs HK-1, (Spruce Goose) eight R-4360 eng's.

    • @sheldonbrunn6445
      @sheldonbrunn6445 3 роки тому

      I seen the spruse goose
      How many cylinders are they

    • @davef.2811
      @davef.2811 3 роки тому +1

      @@sheldonbrunn6445 28 cyls. each, same engine. If it had ever actually flown any distance, the F.E. would have probably become suicidal after a few hours of flight...

  • @ritchienegrea5779
    @ritchienegrea5779 3 роки тому

    Such a complex. Twisted design engine. Mechanics. Go nuts to maintain these things. No access to anything unless talking the motor apart

  • @bradleydavies4781
    @bradleydavies4781 3 роки тому

    Thunderbolt , Corsair and hellcat .

  • @genefoster8601
    @genefoster8601 3 роки тому

    This is what Haley Davidson was designed after. Check your history.

  • @Simon_r2600
    @Simon_r2600 3 роки тому

    3:09 why does it have a Hubcap on the prop?

    • @flymoore
      @flymoore 3 роки тому +1

      Its just the forward spinner bulkhead. Normally there is a spinner over the prop hub but it is left off for this maintenance run

  • @cartestchannel90
    @cartestchannel90  3 роки тому +1

    Where are you from guys ? :)

    • @jamespadden6023
      @jamespadden6023 3 роки тому +1

      I worked these old corncobs in the 1950s as a crew chief of the B 50 bomber K c 97 and the C 1124

    • @josiahguthrie5797
      @josiahguthrie5797 3 роки тому +1

      You spelled Starting wrong in the title fyi. Just saying.

  • @di7962
    @di7962 3 роки тому

    これ回すのはイイとしてどれだけガソリン消費するんだべ?

  • @pagey1950
    @pagey1950 3 роки тому

    That Hawker Sea Fury is powered by the Centaurus sleeve valve engine, not the R2800 P and W.

    • @sophiejaysstuff4026
      @sophiejaysstuff4026 3 роки тому

      This one has the 2800, some have the 3350. Very few still fly the Centaurus. Look up the guys who own it.

    • @felixpoma5005
      @felixpoma5005 3 роки тому

      pp

  • @woodychadick5905
    @woodychadick5905 3 роки тому

    Anyone know the name of that corncob looking radial?

    • @davef.2811
      @davef.2811 3 роки тому +2

      Pratt & Whitney R-4360.

    • @timmayer8723
      @timmayer8723 3 роки тому +3

      The ' corncob' radial is the P&W R-4360. 28 cylinders, turbo supercharged with alcohol/water injection. Capable of 3500 hp on take off. Capable of 4000 HP for ten minutes using the War Military Power throttle settings. I worked on these engines for four years while in the Air Force in the mid sixties. They were tried on the corsair F4U fighter but didn't work out for a number of reasons. There are many of these engines stored in air tight canisters with ''0' Hours on them out in the south west USA.

    • @woodychadick5905
      @woodychadick5905 3 роки тому

      I read, the reason for this beast was to overtake kamikazes.

  • @richardcarper8566
    @richardcarper8566 3 роки тому +1

    There iz no sound,like a round !!!

  • @claudio743
    @claudio743 3 роки тому

    I did not know the British Sea Fury had a P&W.

  • @mysticwine
    @mysticwine 3 роки тому

    Tail wheelers

  • @kennethmoxon7337
    @kennethmoxon7337 3 роки тому

    Good job that's not on a plane ignition well off