You'd be surprised what ameture astrophotography equiptment can capture. Most of the vissable salmon pink colors you see is sulfur and hydrogen, where as the bright white regions are oxygen and reflections
As a matter of fact, Hubble images are within the visable spectrum. Just narrow parts of it. Most those hubble images are false color images. And the hubble's optics are coated with aluminum, so it doesnt get much ir signal nor really much uv. In short its performence as far as what wavelengths it can capture ranges from 400nm-800nm
Actually, as an astro-nerd, that image was actually imaged in visible light, it was just color mapped in SHO (fully named SII, H-A, OIII Narrowband) S stands for Sulfur and it is mapped in the color red H stands for Hydrogen and it is mapped in the color green O stands for Oxygen and it is mapped in the color blue
One trick you can do in spaceengine is to bring the LOD settings to max on the config, and to press hyphen “-“ in order to change between loading modes. So you can have an immediate loading mode in a specific nice looking spot and it will load a lot of detail instantly. Although I suggest to switch it out once youre done or else exploring with that mode enabled can bring the fps down by a lot.
05:02 Helix nebula! : ) NGC-7293 is a planetary nebula in the constellation Aquarious. M-57 Ring nebula is also a planetary nebula, its apparent size is way smaller and it lies in the constellation Lyra between stars Sheliak and Sulafat
Science nerd here the reason they look different in Hubble images is because they are all false color - meaning they start out as black and white, and are then colored. Most often this is to highlight interesting features of the object in the image so what your seeing in space engine is how they actually look
I've seen your videos are getting more character at the begining of the video or other times. I don't know how to explane it, but i like it! Keep up the amazing work chip! Your doing great!
Cool video! I get mixed up at times with some celestial bodies as well because they look alike or are in a similar part of the sky, especially elliptical galaxies.
Hey,i know i sound like a nerd but, the pillars of creation in SpaceEngine are actually more accurate,Hubble just changes the colors the actual pillars are red
5:51 NOOO the one you saw in space engine is the ring nebula but the one that appears in the image is the helix nebula, they are two completely different nebulae
Tip: Eagles Nebula's Pillars of Creations are hydrogen gas materials and not visible by eye or Hubble normal camera. Here you need Huble Infra-red or other specialized camera view to see it.
I believe the eagle nebula looks so red because of elements like Sulfur and Hydrogen present within the nebula. Most images of the eagle nebula are either color-shifted to differentiate elements, or taken from telescopes than can absorb and process lightwaves outside our visible spectrum, which then shifts colors to make those certain lightwaves visible to us.
Nebula are bit tricky to vissually observe if you have slow optics and live in a bortle 5+ region. If you want to vissually observe emmision and reflection nebula, best scope for that would be a 8" to 14" aperture dobsonian reflector.
Hey Chip, I want you to do 4 things. 1: Can you make Pangaea Earth and Laurasia and Gondwana Earth? 2: Can you make the Moon habitable? 3: Can you make Titan ( Saturn's biggest moon ) habitable? 4: Can you add Rings to the Earth?
Hey space chip, I don't think that you used the best Andromeda Galaxy picture because I'm pretty sure it looks like it has more white irl just like in space engine.
Bring the biggest planet and smallest star and put them in an orbit... It's basically like solar system but the star is replaced by giant planet and planet is replaced by giant star
#earthling Day 16 (2 weeks and 2 days) Try mine, Try to add another earth that shares same oribit as our earth but it stays exactly opposite to the earth direction towards the sun. I think this is a good idea and see what happens to our earth and another earth.
(WARNING: LONG COMMENT BELOW) So Hubble's pictures are normally taken in false color or sometimes, enhanced color with long exposure images. This is usually done for scientific reasons, so no it's not because NASA is "lying" to us before conspiracy theorists say that. The objects would look very different to your human eyes, and Space Engine more closely represents just that, what you'd see with your own HUMAN eyes. However it gets even more complicated then THAT too. Our human eyes aren't very good at perceiving color in low light levels. The sky is still blue at night time, but because it's so dark our eyes go from photopic vision to scotopic vision, which is great at detecting brightness, but not so much color. That's why the sky looks black at night to us on Earth. This also applies to space objects. If we were to go up into space and somehow be able to breathe we could see these objects however they would look different then in photographs. In my opinion, just as beautiful, just in a different, more subtle way. We'd still see the planets in color because they are bright enough. If we were to go up to Saturn, we would see it just as it appears in photographs. A pretty, pale orb with very bright and visible rings. However if we were to say, go to a galaxy or a nebula, we WOULD see the nebula but it would appear monochromatic, with multicolored stars (because some stars are bright enough to trigger color in our eyes) in front of it. Flying through the nebula would look like flying through a cloud. Very foggy. So if you truly want Space Engine to look realistic, you should turn the saturation down to reflect how humans would see these objects. There is actually a really great website called Deep Sky Watch www.deepskywatch.com/astronomy-sketches.html and it was made by an expert astronomer who frequently visits extremely dark skies. He sketches exactly what he sees in the telescope, and yes THESE pictures are ACTUALLY how these objects would appear to you. Some are bright enough to see color in, and some aren't. If you wanted to you could recreate THESE images in Space Engine for a truly realistic experience. And in my opinion, if you fiddle with the settings just a bit, you can make Space Engine the most true to life space simulator ever created. (Oh and for those that are sad that nebulas aren't as colorful in real life let me tell you two things.) (1. Long exposure photographs in particular are still realistic, just not to our human eyes. When we see long exposure photos of say, the Milky Way and the Orion Nebula that look multicolored and beautiful, the objects REALLY do look like that. As in, if our eyes were good enough we would see them like that, it's just that our eyes AREN'T good enough and so we don't see them like that. In a way the photographs are actually MORE realistic, in that sense because they show the objects as they ARE, not how we perceive them.) (2. Not all nebulas are created equal. There are some nebulas, like the Tarantula Nebula that WOULD actually be bright enough to trigger color in our eyes. So they would look close to how they do in photographs, and if you were inside it, it would look like a scene straight out of a science fiction movie. It would be glorious.)
As others have said, the reason why some of the reference images dont match up to what you see in Space Engine isn't due to a fault by the Space Engine creators. They're different because the reference images are usually highly edited or are composed of IR or x-ray images instead of true color. If you go online and look for true-color images of different well known objects, you'll see that they usually look completely different. They can also sometimes be edited with different colors that aren't there naturally to highlight different aspects. While i enjoyed the video, it did irk me that you seemed to put blame on the Space Engine creators for the differences that you were ignorant to.
Idk if space generator has this target yet, "Ghost of Cassiopia" Probably will indeed have the heart and soul nebula. Maybe the pacman. Not sure about the bubble or lobster claw nebula
i ate my last snack while watching you, might not be much for someone else than me, but for me, its the biggest honor i can bestow you apart from subscribing
Hey spacechip
hey
@@Space_Chip hey chip could you try terraform Miranda naturally with tidal heating from uranus and stuff?
@@Space_Chip hey chip can you add another sun but it orbits the sun and it will be inside the kupier belt
@@Space_Chipr u in space?
@@Space_Chip try making Charon habitable
I think that pillars are brighter in Hubble's images cause those telescope usually image things in IR, visible is rarely used
You'd be surprised what ameture astrophotography equiptment can capture.
Most of the vissable salmon pink colors you see is sulfur and hydrogen, where as the bright white regions are oxygen and reflections
Hay space chip ges I got space engine
Well, Hubble used VIS, Webb uses IR
As a matter of fact, Hubble images are within the visable spectrum.
Just narrow parts of it.
Most those hubble images are false color images.
And the hubble's optics are coated with aluminum, so it doesnt get much ir signal nor really much uv.
In short its performence as far as what wavelengths it can capture ranges from 400nm-800nm
Actually, as an astro-nerd, that image was actually imaged in visible light, it was just color mapped in SHO (fully named SII, H-A, OIII Narrowband)
S stands for Sulfur and it is mapped in the color red
H stands for Hydrogen and it is mapped in the color green
O stands for Oxygen and it is mapped in the color blue
One trick you can do in spaceengine is to bring the LOD settings to max on the config, and to press hyphen “-“ in order to change between loading modes. So you can have an immediate loading mode in a specific nice looking spot and it will load a lot of detail instantly. Although I suggest to switch it out once youre done or else exploring with that mode enabled can bring the fps down by a lot.
Hey chip! Your videos are amazing! Keep it up!
@Zishan Ozair yes his videos are godly
@@Harry_CatEditz229 his opinion
@@Dijk1213 nope, no opinion on this, its a fact that hes video's are godly🤨
@German Shepherd Grass is right you are wrong
05:02 Helix nebula! : )
NGC-7293 is a planetary nebula in the constellation Aquarious.
M-57 Ring nebula is also a planetary nebula, its apparent size is way smaller and it lies in the constellation Lyra between stars
Sheliak and Sulafat
I searched for the ring nebula and the helix nebula and got the same result.
Science nerd here the reason they look different in Hubble images is because they are all false color - meaning they start out as black and white, and are then colored. Most often this is to highlight interesting features of the object in the image so what your seeing in space engine is how they actually look
They did that with the Voyager 1 images too right?
Yea
@@mikeperez5221 that's cool
They put a pattern of colours, mix it together and you get the most accurate colour in the photo
@@CheeseBloxianEX pretty much
6:48 aNdRoMeDa
I've seen your videos are getting more character at the begining of the video or other times. I don't know how to explane it, but i like it! Keep up the amazing work chip! Your doing great!
Yo chip at 5:00 thats the helix nebula not the ring nebula and the andormeda picture is not from hubble and orion too
Cool video! I get mixed up at times with some celestial bodies as well because they look alike or are in a similar part of the sky, especially elliptical galaxies.
why is the time 2518 💀
Yeah it makes the stars in diff positions
Hey,i know i sound like a nerd but, the pillars of creation in SpaceEngine are actually more accurate,Hubble just changes the colors the actual pillars are red
💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
3:22 I call the eagle nebula the Brazil nebula.
IKR
Lol
YOU'RE GOING TO BRAZIL
Yo chip, the 5:01 image is not the ring nebula, Its actually the "Helix Nebula" or also known as "God of Eye Nebula"
💀💀
?
Hey chip the reference image for ring nebula that you chose is not the ring nebula but its actually the helix nebula
5:17 you said ring nebula, it’s actually called the helix nebula,
5:33 the picture was the helix nebula actually
Hey Chip! try and make every planet and moon habitable in the default system in Universe Sandbox
Love your Content!!!
Can you make mercury so big that it makes everything orbit it?
Ring Nebula: THAT'S NOT ME!!!! Helix Nebula: 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
It's amazing what a good job Space Engine does of it. Definitely excels at planets but nebula is still pretty impressive
❤❤❤❤
Fun fact: the galaxy near M51 that chip was talking about is maybe Sombrero Galaxy.
Clash Uranus to Neptune
5:14 thats not the ring nebula, thats the helix nebula.
💀💀💀💀
@@reinakusunoki1352 its true
Its true
5:51 NOOO the one you saw in space engine is the ring nebula but the one that appears in the image is the helix nebula, they are two completely different nebulae
Tip: Eagles Nebula's Pillars of Creations are hydrogen gas materials and not visible by eye or Hubble normal camera. Here you need Huble Infra-red or other specialized camera view to see it.
Hi spacechip! Ive been subscribed to upu since 100 subs! Anyways your my favorite UA-camr!
I believe the eagle nebula looks so red because of elements like Sulfur and Hydrogen present within the nebula. Most images of the eagle nebula are either color-shifted to differentiate elements, or taken from telescopes than can absorb and process lightwaves outside our visible spectrum, which then shifts colors to make those certain lightwaves visible to us.
Narrowband pass imaging
Nebula are bit tricky to vissually observe if you have slow optics and live in a bortle 5+ region.
If you want to vissually observe emmision and reflection nebula, best scope for that would be a 8" to 14" aperture dobsonian reflector.
at 6:00 the real picture is of the helix nebula not the ring nebula
Hey Chip, I want you to do 4 things. 1: Can you make Pangaea Earth and Laurasia and Gondwana Earth? 2: Can you make the Moon habitable? 3: Can you make Titan ( Saturn's biggest moon ) habitable? 4: Can you add Rings to the Earth?
5:02 That's the helix nebula
That is helix nebula!4:59
#earthling hey chip can you combine a blockhole and a whitehole and replace the Sagittarius A with this new entity BTW love your videos from India
Hi chip your my fav UA-camr keep doing what you’re doing so far you the best you deserve 100m
Hey space chip, I don't think that you used the best Andromeda Galaxy picture because I'm pretty sure it looks like it has more white irl just like in space engine.
Hello universe dorito. I have a video suggestion. Try and make the sun and Jupiter a binary system and see what happens to the other planets.
so much good videos man , your my fav youtuber
I would love to see mods to make these nebulas and galaxies look beautiful!
it exists
whats it called?
@@lqchlan
just look through the steam workshop its called like realistic nubulae or something@@zaidmub5522
hubbas are manually colored in not taken and instantly have that color so it would have different colors
💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
Dang, they look very similar!
Ok just realised some of them dont look similar 😅
hey chip, I came across one of your space engine videos randomly and now I cant stop watching your videos
Sameee
SAMEEEEEEEEEEEEE
0:14 "*Nebulae"~ 🤓
The image for ring nebula is helix nebula
at 5:00 that was the helix nebula not the ring nebula
Make the thing that Jupiter holds that make a ring 10x bigger
Hey chip! could you make life on mercury?
#earthling
Can you make Miranda (Uranus’s moon) and Triton (Neptune’s moon) habitable?
Hey chip can you do a video about searching for galaxies and showing us what is in there😊.
6:48 i love this voice
2:16 is that barnard 68
The picture of the ring nebula from the hubble is the Helix nebula
You have to be the best thief ever; you stole my heart just from the other side of the room.
the way the pillars of creation look in space engine looks like its other name the pillars of destruction
0:31 Blud Made The Doctor Who Vortex 💀
im pretty sure pillars were actually were very red and hubble uses some different color thing so its like blue and stuff
Hey Chip!
Honestly one of my favourite UA-camrs rn
Video suggestion look for planets like earth in the Whirlpool galaxy
The smaller galaxy near the whirlpool galaxy is the sombrero galaxy
Damn ppl need to give proper names to galaxies 😐
5:01 That's the Helix Nebula
Bring the biggest planet and smallest star and put them in an orbit... It's basically like solar system but the star is replaced by giant planet and planet is replaced by giant star
#earthling
Day 16 (2 weeks and 2 days)
Try mine,
Try to add another earth that shares same oribit as our earth but it stays exactly opposite to the earth direction towards the sun.
I think this is a good idea and see what happens to our earth and another earth.
Video idea- Get a chip, if the game has it! And launch it at earth
#earthling hey chip can you speed time soooo much that sun becomes a black dwarf. BTW love your videos from india
Go to a galaxy that starts with RG
I love your videos so much
Did everyone else think he will say space engine is more real than real life?
i love space and the shop
1:11 sombrero galaxy
(WARNING: LONG COMMENT BELOW)
So Hubble's pictures are normally taken in false color or sometimes, enhanced color with long exposure images. This is usually done for scientific reasons, so no it's not because NASA is "lying" to us before conspiracy theorists say that. The objects would look very different to your human eyes, and Space Engine more closely represents just that, what you'd see with your own HUMAN eyes.
However it gets even more complicated then THAT too. Our human eyes aren't very good at perceiving color in low light levels. The sky is still blue at night time, but because it's so dark our eyes go from photopic vision to scotopic vision, which is great at detecting brightness, but not so much color. That's why the sky looks black at night to us on Earth.
This also applies to space objects. If we were to go up into space and somehow be able to breathe we could see these objects however they would look different then in photographs. In my opinion, just as beautiful, just in a different, more subtle way. We'd still see the planets in color because they are bright enough. If we were to go up to Saturn, we would see it just as it appears in photographs. A pretty, pale orb with very bright and visible rings. However if we were to say, go to a galaxy or a nebula, we WOULD see the nebula but it would appear monochromatic, with multicolored stars (because some stars are bright enough to trigger color in our eyes) in front of it. Flying through the nebula would look like flying through a cloud. Very foggy.
So if you truly want Space Engine to look realistic, you should turn the saturation down to reflect how humans would see these objects. There is actually a really great website called Deep Sky Watch
www.deepskywatch.com/astronomy-sketches.html
and it was made by an expert astronomer who frequently visits extremely dark skies. He sketches exactly what he sees in the telescope, and yes THESE pictures are ACTUALLY how these objects would appear to you. Some are bright enough to see color in, and some aren't. If you wanted to you could recreate THESE images in Space Engine for a truly realistic experience. And in my opinion, if you fiddle with the settings just a bit, you can make Space Engine the most true to life space simulator ever created.
(Oh and for those that are sad that nebulas aren't as colorful in real life let me tell you two things.)
(1. Long exposure photographs in particular are still realistic, just not to our human eyes. When we see long exposure photos of say, the Milky Way and the Orion Nebula that look multicolored and beautiful, the objects REALLY do look like that. As in, if our eyes were good enough we would see them like that, it's just that our eyes AREN'T good enough and so we don't see them like that. In a way the photographs are actually MORE realistic, in that sense because they show the objects as they ARE, not how we perceive them.)
(2. Not all nebulas are created equal. There are some nebulas, like the Tarantula Nebula that WOULD actually be bright enough to trigger color in our eyes. So they would look close to how they do in photographs, and if you were inside it, it would look like a scene straight out of a science fiction movie. It would be glorious.)
As others have said, the reason why some of the reference images dont match up to what you see in Space Engine isn't due to a fault by the Space Engine creators. They're different because the reference images are usually highly edited or are composed of IR or x-ray images instead of true color. If you go online and look for true-color images of different well known objects, you'll see that they usually look completely different. They can also sometimes be edited with different colors that aren't there naturally to highlight different aspects.
While i enjoyed the video, it did irk me that you seemed to put blame on the Space Engine creators for the differences that you were ignorant to.
Hello Chip! Can you please do the planet what have star as the moon please?
That galaxy u saw underneath it is I’m pretty sure it’s the pin galaxy or the flower galaxy
The ring nebula looks like a giant eye it’s so pretty
Why are there so many ads in just this one video? Good video anyways, but maybe reduce the ads in future videos.
Man i can't believe you actually did my idea to make some kind of a telescope simulator lol, thanks for that.
I love you space chip you make great space videos
CAN YOU COMBINE JUPITER AND EVERY OTHER GAS GIANTS PLEASE?
bro thats the helix nebula
I don’t think you understand how much I love the game
Idk if space generator has this target yet, "Ghost of Cassiopia"
Probably will indeed have the heart and soul nebula. Maybe the pacman.
Not sure about the bubble or lobster claw nebula
You are enchanting!✨✨✨
Did you know that Beetlejuice is about to explode (supernova)and make the night sky bright for a few weeks?
:Fun fact: sometimes SpaceEngine is more realistic than real life
What
I LOVE SPACE CHIPS VIDEOS I REALLY LIKE IT❤❤❤
2:06 thats where the *hubble is*
The ring nebula wasn’t the real one at the image, the image it’s actually the helix nebula
1:25 Okay and BOOM "literally we cant see with realistic lighting "silence" .. Oka-
#earthling hey chip it well be cool to find a system in space engine and re-created in universe sandbox 2 ( Day 3 )
I have a request:
Please go to the sombrero galaxy. That’s what it’s called.
I have a question, I have a glitch and I wanna fix it, the glitch is I can’t reverse time or set to current time.
Ring Nebula was beautiful but the sound was creepy
i ate my last snack while watching you, might not be much for someone else than me, but for me, its the biggest honor i can bestow you apart from subscribing
hey space chip i think you should recreate the sun expanding and eating earth which will happen irl in 5billion years)
Hey chip, can you make a Binary 3 star system and add some planets to it
That's Not The Ring Nebula From The Picture, It's The Helix Nebula @Space_Chip
@Space_chip you made me love space❤❤❤😊😊
I think that spaceengine is the closest game to play and see space
For some reason the ring nebula I feel is going to be called the eye nebula
Do Hourglass Nebula😊