There Will Be Blood Almost Had A Completely Different Main Star

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 вер 2024
  • There Will Be Blood will forever be remembered as one of the greatest films ever made. Though one specific casting choice almost changed the course of There Will Be Blood Forever. No, not Daniel Plainview, it would be the other lead of the movie Eli Sunday. Would There Will Be Blood be held in the same regard had nothing changed?
    #therewillbeblood #danieldaylewis #nerdstalgic
    Written by Dave Baker
    Edited by Chris De Pew

КОМЕНТАРІ • 97

  • @Nerdstalgic
    @Nerdstalgic  Рік тому +51

    Would There Will Be Blood have been as iconic without Paul Dano?

  • @kingturtle9552
    @kingturtle9552 Рік тому +160

    Everything about this movie is perfect, physically can’t picture anyone else in that role than Dano. Oh and the delivery of the milkshake line by Lewis made it one of the most iconic lines of dialog ever.

  • @joehispanico
    @joehispanico Рік тому +97

    I worked on the crew for there will be blood and saw about 80% of the scenes filmed with Kel. I heard a few things here and there from the the editors and anyone involved with reviewing the daily’s. Mostly that he wasn’t matching the energy of Daniel day Lewis.
    I’d have to say that this was apparent, as there was a big difference when Paul Dano stepped. I can’t say if there was any apparent tensions with Daniel, or PTA because they never showed any conflict on set.
    Daniel stayed in character the whole time, but was polite when talking to him. He would stay away when doing more intense scenes but I never saw him be mean or anything like that when not filming a scene.

    • @Coburnify
      @Coburnify Рік тому +9

      Yeah. Just feels like he couldn't match the level of charisma to me.

    • @matthewalexanderlemma8000
      @matthewalexanderlemma8000 9 місяців тому +3

      Hey, thanks for sharing that! Just for the sake of asking, Did O’Neill display any type of immature and/or frustrated behavior while on set?

    • @joehispanico
      @joehispanico 9 місяців тому +3

      @@matthewalexanderlemma8000 not that I noticed. Everyone was very professional from what I can remember.

    • @sij809
      @sij809 3 місяці тому +1

      Thanks for sharing. When you put everything together it seems that basically he couldn't go toe to toe with Day Lewis and Paul could tell so had to let him go. I'm curious though. I heard initially the brothers were not twins. That Paul Dano was already cast as one of the brothers and then when kel got fired PTA had the thought to just make them twins so Paul could play both parts. Is this true? Because in the video that parts kinda hazy. They make it sound like they got Paul Dano last second

    • @joehispanico
      @joehispanico 3 місяці тому +1

      @@sij809 so, Paul Dano did have the small part prior and he was liked because of the chemistry. So there was a change to make him play both parts. Now I can’t say if they were twins or not prior. But for sure brothers.
      All I know is they must have wanted Dano at some time before they officially canned him. Because Dano was in pretty quick and was nailing the scenes really fast.
      My other form of reasoning is that they were suppose to burn the oil rig earlier during filming but they kept holding off on it. I could only guess it’s because they knew it wasn’t working.

  • @bhaskarkakati
    @bhaskarkakati Рік тому +52

    With just 4 days to filming and starring opposite a legend like Daniel Day Lewis, I would say Paul Deno nailed his part.

  • @aliminator1310
    @aliminator1310 Рік тому +67

    I like that he's still got a career he enjoys.

  • @abdelali9279
    @abdelali9279 Рік тому +40

    I am really glad the other actor got a career in what he liked, maybe it was indeed for the best for him.

  • @Chris_Faraday
    @Chris_Faraday Рік тому +11

    Dano was the powerhouse he needed to equal DDL - he was the perfect blessing for the film

  • @joaoyapur1247
    @joaoyapur1247 Рік тому +26

    This is exactly like what happened with Keitel and Coppola in Apocalypse Now, as soon as the actor arrived to location it became clear that it wouldnt work, aand all of the sudden you got this other guy (Paul Dano) which is a unique actor with the perfect fisique du rol for the character, there's no need for a major conflict, when they saw Dano they knew he was perfect for the role.

  • @completesentences2125
    @completesentences2125 Рік тому +7

    Some people know Paul Dano as “The Sunday Twins”…but he’ll always be Klitz to me.

    • @seansturgill4869
      @seansturgill4869 2 місяці тому

      Yes!!!! Same for me! Girl Next Door is tremendous!

  • @laganas2008
    @laganas2008 Рік тому +11

    I've abandoned my role!!

  • @Gemnist98
    @Gemnist98 Рік тому +59

    I’m convinced that Paul and Eli are actually the same person, since they’re never onscreen together and Paul disappears after his first scene before Eli takes over completely. Like, Eli brought Daniel to the town using a Paul persona before showing his true colors through Eli.

    • @TheCusita93
      @TheCusita93 Рік тому +5

      I've thought so too, and if I remember correctly, Paul is never brought up again in the film.

    • @rachelblake2350
      @rachelblake2350 Рік тому +15

      @@TheCusita93 he is though. In the final scene, Plainview tells Eli that Paul had got super rich off their deal and got into the oil business himself. This always through me off because I thought the ruse was that Paul sold out his entire town to a predatory monster, and Plainview knew the truth of it, but never mentions it as this hanging guillotine over Eli. And the conflict of the movie is these two pushing each other to see who breaks first. But nope, turns out, twins. Biggest flaw in an otherwise perfect movie. Like, either make them the same person, or have a single scene with the two of them together. You can't do neither.

    • @GoblinArmyInYourWalls
      @GoblinArmyInYourWalls Рік тому +7

      @Rachel Blake I don't think it's a flaw. I think it adds another layer to the character interactions from the perspective of the viewer. It's a confusion, yes, but confusion isn't always a bad thing. It makes people think after the film is finished. Not every film has to have every thread neatly tied up by the end.

    • @singleplayermoments
      @singleplayermoments Рік тому +2

      @@rachelblake2350 I didn't get that at all. I always thought of Paul and Eli as two different people. Although, I did keep wondering why we didn't see Paul anymore throughout the film, but that just made the reveal that he got rich off the deal and has all along been living a life of luxury hit that much harder.

    • @pennydreadful5163
      @pennydreadful5163 Рік тому

      @@rachelblake2350 *threw

  • @steve_bal4
    @steve_bal4 Рік тому +11

    Based on the clip from 4:43 they absolutely made the right choice. As was Kel to leave acting behind. 💩

  • @willyum3920
    @willyum3920 Рік тому +13

    Paul Dano is so good he didn't really need this. I know it was massive for him but something else would have come along for sure.
    I know Daniel Day Lewis isn't likely to be in any new films his filmography is too short. I can't keep watching Gangs of New York, it has so many issues (although DDL isn't one of them)

  • @thehive7571
    @thehive7571 Рік тому +2

    I love this movie remember seeing it when I was 10 years old now I’m 27 and still watching it

  • @symmetry08
    @symmetry08 6 днів тому

    For really good movie personal relationship is not the most important part, however, finding the one who will fit. Dano was a perfect look and voice-wise too. And he acted as it was demanded. It is not that others would have been bad but amongst 1000 he was the one to be picked up. He was so convinsingly as that person how it should be like.

  • @LetThatStuffGo
    @LetThatStuffGo Рік тому +7

    Fantastic movie.

  • @Abz815
    @Abz815 Рік тому +3

    Good call on changing the thumbnail, I couldn't tell which is which

  • @RossIsFine
    @RossIsFine Рік тому +9

    Also Pastor Sunday is loosely based on the charismatic man, Billy Sunday, preacher in the late 1800s to early 20th century.

  • @dcastillo2008
    @dcastillo2008 Рік тому +4

    Unpopular opinion but I could tell something was off with Paul Danos parts...but for the time he had he did a decent job. Not sure who could hold their own against DDL because even Leo who is pretty amazing kept throwing me off and not matching up to his energy.

  • @marniekilbourne608
    @marniekilbourne608 16 днів тому

    All good movies are not "beloved". That word has a positive connotation that doesn't apply the same to more serious and disturbing movies.

  • @zzaman2141
    @zzaman2141 Рік тому +3

    Amazing 😮

  • @MarkLaw13
    @MarkLaw13 Рік тому +2

    I'm more intrigued on how old Paul Dano. He looks the same but because he's not a Hollywood picked man. He doesn't get the Paul Rudd, Keanu Reeves

    • @dreamcast.0
      @dreamcast.0 Рік тому +1

      He was 21 during the filming of TWBB. He's only 38 now, but is aging very nicely!

  • @catalystdrums123
    @catalystdrums123 Рік тому +3

    He pronounces his name "day-no" not "dan-oh"

  • @Punmaster9001
    @Punmaster9001 Рік тому +15

    It would be interesting to see the version that might have been and compare it to what we got. Not just this movie, but many other films

  • @riverplate0101
    @riverplate0101 Рік тому +2

    He kind of resembles Messi

  • @VintageYakyu
    @VintageYakyu Рік тому

    When you work with a once in a lifetime talent like Daniel Day-Lewis, you don't try to make waves, you just consider yourself lucky to be allowed to swim in his wake.

  • @RamiroEloy1997
    @RamiroEloy1997 Рік тому +6

    It was between Paul Dano and Queen Latifah

  • @GuadalupePicasso
    @GuadalupePicasso 7 місяців тому

    They could’ve flipped roles, and had Kell O’Neil play Paul Sunday, since he’s only in the one scene near the beginning.
    Now people speculate if Paul and Eli were really the same people, and that Eli had a split personality disorder (bolstered, some say, as, when Eli attacks his father at the dinner table, no one says anything in reference to Paul, either in confirmation or denial of his existence)

  • @clintstewart5545
    @clintstewart5545 Рік тому

    Best movie of this century for me !!!

  • @JoonKy
    @JoonKy Рік тому +1

    Why is the text/vid of thumbnail Eli Sunday, but the pic is of Daniel Day Lewis character?

  • @Andrewearnshaw
    @Andrewearnshaw 7 місяців тому

    Kel O'neill could play David Portnoy.

  • @HarvestStore
    @HarvestStore Рік тому

    Great video.

  • @danielwatcherofthelord1823
    @danielwatcherofthelord1823 Рік тому

    I'm happy O'Neil found his way.

  • @gelmibson883
    @gelmibson883 Рік тому +1

    Woo!

  • @jd35711
    @jd35711 Рік тому

    I'm pretty sure DDL could break my spirit on set in short order.

  • @coveycrenshaw3941
    @coveycrenshaw3941 Рік тому

    What happened to the last guy that was running this channel? He was great

  • @davidloveday8473
    @davidloveday8473 6 місяців тому +1

    I thought having Paul and Eli Sunday as identical twins was needlessly confusing, especially when they didn't appear at the same time and when at least one of them potentially was a charlatan/confidence trickster. For me it really detracted from the film. I spent half the time second-guessing whether it was actually mesnt to be twins or just someone pretending to be twins, whilst also thinking this was a really silly aspect which surely as an audience we weren't meant to be grappling with

  • @DirteeLektrix
    @DirteeLektrix 9 місяців тому

    Brilliant movie

  • @NikoFrederiko.
    @NikoFrederiko. Рік тому +2

    PD is overrated.

  • @MrOctober44
    @MrOctober44 Рік тому

    Small nitpick. Calling it one of the most successful movies in the past thirty years is a huge exaggeration. It had a 25 million budget and made about 75. On a critical level it only won one Oscar. Really enjoyed the video. 🙂

    • @anam1097
      @anam1097 9 місяців тому

      that’s not the only way to measure success tho. he probably meant that they were able to make a masterpiece in the end

    • @MrOctober44
      @MrOctober44 9 місяців тому

      @@anam1097 That would be an extremely odd way to phrase It if he meant critically

    • @MrOctober44
      @MrOctober44 6 місяців тому

      @@pereirahawk Seems like someone is trying to pick a fight, lol

  • @Harsht8
    @Harsht8 Рік тому

  • @aztro.99
    @aztro.99 Рік тому

    IVE ABANDON MY CHILD, IVE ABANDONED MY BOY

  • @thecataclysman
    @thecataclysman Рік тому +7

    First! Sorry, I never do it but i had to for a video about my favorite movie of the last 20 years.
    Edit: turns out I wasn’t the first.

    • @Nerdstalgic
      @Nerdstalgic  Рік тому

      Thanks for checking out the video!

  • @erikbihari3625
    @erikbihari3625 Рік тому

    Ok?

  • @Yachirobi
    @Yachirobi Рік тому +2

    And now I'm left wondering who of the three men I should hate (probably none of them)

    • @m.n.2971
      @m.n.2971 Рік тому +5

      You answered your own question. Sometimes things just don't click on set, it's not necessarily because someone was incompetent or a dick.

  • @Dragon_5th-Regeneration
    @Dragon_5th-Regeneration Рік тому +2

    As for being a “nerd” or “nostalgic” this is neither. You presented a question, with no real answer.

    • @matthewrocca4197
      @matthewrocca4197 Рік тому +1

      Nostalgic nerds are filled with questions that don't necessarily have answers. That's not some sort of inherent paradox. Perhaps if the name of the channel was "Philosopher With All the Answers". But definitely no irony or contradiction in a "nerd" who's "nostalgic" posing questions without answers. Also, the point of the video is to give us something to contemplate which we may not have before, a new spin on a classic tale. For all of my knowledge of the making of TWBB, I actually didn't know very much about the Ken O Neil aspect, so this video served its purpose effectively.

  • @anonymouz88
    @anonymouz88 Рік тому

    I actually prefer The Master ;)

  • @hamnchee
    @hamnchee Рік тому +1

    I never really liked Paul Dano's performance. It always struck me as bad acting. I don't know what it is, but when I watch him, I don't see a character, I see an actor straining to act.

    • @bigol9223
      @bigol9223 Місяць тому

      I agree, he's the weakest aspect of the film, but it's too good for him to ruin.

  • @Dumbledore6969x
    @Dumbledore6969x Рік тому

    Algo

  • @GohanFutureSSJ
    @GohanFutureSSJ Рік тому +4

    Is that Paul daino

  • @mattengland653
    @mattengland653 Рік тому

    I’ll save you 8 minutes - here is the lesson:
    If PTA wants to transform you into a megastar out of obscurity you fuckin show up and bring the energy. Probably the biggest mistake of “Kel’s” life… never head of the guy before or after lol

  • @SupermarketsRevil
    @SupermarketsRevil Рік тому +1

    Row as in argument rhymes with cow, not low.

    • @theessay2530
      @theessay2530 9 місяців тому

      Exactly what I was going to say

  • @squanto2
    @squanto2 Рік тому

    This is by far my favorite movie of all time. I don't care about UA-cam videos describing the trivial minutia about casting.