Why UK Should Relinquish Its UNSC Permanent Membership To India: Professor Mahbubani Explains

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 48

  • @Revel136
    @Revel136 2 місяці тому +1

    YES!!!

  • @sabesankandasamy9331
    @sabesankandasamy9331 Місяць тому +1

    Fully support his proposal. Britain is no longer Great. It has become Little Britain

  • @ethercruiser1537
    @ethercruiser1537 2 місяці тому

    The British Empire is dead. I agree. UK should give up its Permanent Membership in the UNSC to India 🇮🇳 👍😊

  • @DB-stuff
    @DB-stuff 2 місяці тому

    It's unfortunate that 2 of the 5 permanent council are murderous dictatorships, but I do think we should expand the permanent members, given Christianity is well represented it would be best if we included a often excluded group, the Islamic religion, Indonesia with the largest percentage of the second largest religion Muslim should be considered

  • @umiryuli768
    @umiryuli768 2 місяці тому

    Kashmir hindistoga qaraydmu pokstongamu

  • @UJ00UJ
    @UJ00UJ 2 місяці тому

    Modi BJP has reduced dominance of India.

  • @lastChang
    @lastChang 2 місяці тому +4

    Why doesn't law-defying China 🇨🇳 relinquish its UN permanent membership to India?
    The UK was a victor in WW2, while China was a liberated by the Allies which includes the UK.

    • @Russiagaming720
      @Russiagaming720 2 місяці тому +3

      Not true China was also a victor and the UK never liberated China and they actually if I’m not wrong caused the most deaths to Japan in WW2 behind America.

    • @LandGrabbingIndia
      @LandGrabbingIndia 2 місяці тому +3

      A toilet seat would be more befitting for the world's biggest open toilet country. UNSC permanent seat? No way.

    • @LandGrabbingIndia
      @LandGrabbingIndia 2 місяці тому +2

      *Title of article/research/report:*
      Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation 2014 update
      *Global Source:*
      UNICEF
      *What article said specifically:*
      India continues to be the country with the highest number of people (597 million people) practising open defecation (Fig. 17).

    • @CYBERFREAK0-n7o
      @CYBERFREAK0-n7o 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@Russiagaming720 The Japanese empire was the colonizer of China, therefore you've just proven the Uk did play a role.

    • @INDIANSARESICKMENOFASIA
      @INDIANSARESICKMENOFASIA 2 місяці тому +4

      @@CYBERFREAK0-n7o How ignorant. Japan may have invaded and occupied certain parts of China, but they have never ever colonized China. If China were colonized by Japan, everyone in China would have surrendered just like India surrendering to Britain completely and learning their colonizer's language and adopting an English name. For example, "India" was named after the British's East India Company.

  • @hockeybros4051
    @hockeybros4051 2 місяці тому

    Why is he talking about UK being replaced by India when it should be Russia a declining power to be replaced besides Russias economy is much smaller than the UK.

    • @clovisra
      @clovisra Місяць тому

      Are you on drugs? Britain was great when could steal from the colonies. Now Britain is spending what it saved from a time that is past now. Russia is great, large, big. Russia has everything it needs in its territory. Russia will not permit to be robbed to make Britain great again.

    • @clovisra
      @clovisra Місяць тому

      Minha reposta não aparece. Por que Quem censura é o senhor da verdade? Mas não vou desistir. Vou publicar tantas vezes for necessário.
      O reino unido era 'great' quando roubava as suas colônias. Não tem mais colônias. Hoje o Reino Unido é uma colônia americana. A Russia não precisa roubar ninguém porque tem de tudo de que precisa. E a Russia não vai deixar acontecer no seu território o que os colonialistas europeus fizeram na Africa para que todos pudessem se apossar do que legitimamente pertence aos povos aficanos, sem se matarem nas suas eternas guerras de conquista.