This is the new one, the N10-009? Or are you taking the previous version still? Messer is quick, I didn't expect new content yet. Dunno what I would do without this resource.
@@stevens1041 his content has saved me so many times! I’ve passed every CompTIA exam I’ve taken so far thanks to his supplemental videos. I’m taking mine in a couple of weeks!
You told that when using NAS, you have to get the file completely to your computer before you can access and/or edit it. But think about a nfs server what is hosting huge files (terabytes) like virtual machine virtual disks. You can start the VM and it will immediately start it without downloading everything from it. And you make changes to the file too on the fly.
NFS has the same file-level access limitation that NAS does. A NAS can do everything that a NFS does in relation to virtual disks more efficiently and just better overall. NFS server can do it too but at an enterprise level it wouldn't be used in place of a SAN or NAS. NFS is fine for homelabbing or a small office.
@@winstonchurchill1273 eh? NFS is a NAS! And NFS is used widely in large enterprise VM environments, serving VM virtual disk files (like VMware datastores)
@@jyk4 NFS is not a NAS. NFS is a protocol. A NAS can use the NFS protocol to serve files and data. I think you meant a network shared folder but still that has the same restrictions as a NAS that you mentioned made it better than NAS in your original post. I got confused too. Network shared folders are used all the time sure but they're inferior to a NAS in about every way
@@winstonchurchill1273 When you use a NFS share, it probably come from a NAS. Sure you can share it from localhost but that's uncommon in production use. And even if it's from localhost, it uses the local network. What you mean by "network shared folder"? NFS? CIFS? You need some protocol to share files from a NAS. What one you mean when you say a "network shared folder" is inferior to to NAS, which protocol you mean?
@@jyk4 What do you mean by NFS server in your original post? You were comparing NFS and NAS like NFS was something physical like a NAS was. I don't really even understand what you are trying to say, your english is hard to comprehend when talking about technical things. Whatever man shiggy diggy, have a blessed new year life is already confusing enough without arguing about vague technical bs to strangers online. Kumbaya and Mitä tapahtuu, tapahtuu i think you people say
How in the WORLD is an access point a layer 2 device when it very clearly operates at layer 3, assigns ipv4 address inherently, and talks to a wireless controller to exchange layer 3 information?
An access point operates at layer two and has no idea what type of packets might be inside of the frame. The management communication between the access point and the controller is not part of the operation of the access point.
@@professormesser In that case, an access point takes frames and distributes them to client devices from it's POV, with no knowledge of the Ipv4 addressing standards that it is communicating?
Correct. As a Layer 2 device, the access point only sees the MAC addresses. There could be IP, IPX, AppleTalk, or any other layer 3 protocol above layer 2. The access point doesn't know or care.
Talk about the timing! About to take this exam! 💪
Good Luck, halfway through my course. You'll kill it!
This is the new one, the N10-009? Or are you taking the previous version still? Messer is quick, I didn't expect new content yet. Dunno what I would do without this resource.
@@stevens1041 his content has saved me so many times! I’ve passed every CompTIA exam I’ve taken so far thanks to his supplemental videos. I’m taking mine in a couple of weeks!
@@stevens1041 I'm halfway through N10-008 on Udemy. Already sent a message about what might have changed on what I've already gone through.
@@stevens1041no kidding. A number of the text book brands I’ve been looking for are not even out yet.
Nas VS San When it is talking about files and being able to modify small chucks what examples are there of these files.
You told that when using NAS, you have to get the file completely to your computer before you can access and/or edit it. But think about a nfs server what is hosting huge files (terabytes) like virtual machine virtual disks. You can start the VM and it will immediately start it without downloading everything from it. And you make changes to the file too on the fly.
NFS has the same file-level access limitation that NAS does. A NAS can do everything that a NFS does in relation to virtual disks more efficiently and just better overall. NFS server can do it too but at an enterprise level it wouldn't be used in place of a SAN or NAS. NFS is fine for homelabbing or a small office.
@@winstonchurchill1273 eh? NFS is a NAS!
And NFS is used widely in large enterprise VM environments, serving VM virtual disk files (like VMware datastores)
@@jyk4 NFS is not a NAS. NFS is a protocol. A NAS can use the NFS protocol to serve files and data. I think you meant a network shared folder but still that has the same restrictions as a NAS that you mentioned made it better than NAS in your original post. I got confused too. Network shared folders are used all the time sure but they're inferior to a NAS in about every way
@@winstonchurchill1273 When you use a NFS share, it probably come from a NAS. Sure you can share it from localhost but that's uncommon in production use. And even if it's from localhost, it uses the local network.
What you mean by "network shared folder"? NFS? CIFS?
You need some protocol to share files from a NAS. What one you mean when you say a "network shared folder" is inferior to to NAS, which protocol you mean?
@@jyk4 What do you mean by NFS server in your original post? You were comparing NFS and NAS like NFS was something physical like a NAS was. I don't really even understand what you are trying to say, your english is hard to comprehend when talking about technical things.
Whatever man shiggy diggy, have a blessed new year life is already confusing enough without arguing about vague technical bs to strangers online. Kumbaya and Mitä tapahtuu, tapahtuu i think you people say
Great video! But I thought bridging was done in software?? Any help?
A network bridge is an actual hardware device that works on Layer 2 just like switches. In fact, another name for switches are "multiport bridges".
@@Kevin-r7f4u thank you!!
How in the WORLD is an access point a layer 2 device when it very clearly operates at layer 3, assigns ipv4 address inherently, and talks to a wireless controller to exchange layer 3 information?
An access point operates at layer two and has no idea what type of packets might be inside of the frame.
The management communication between the access point and the controller is not part of the operation of the access point.
@@professormesser In that case, an access point takes frames and distributes them to client devices from it's POV, with no knowledge of the Ipv4 addressing standards that it is communicating?
Correct. As a Layer 2 device, the access point only sees the MAC addresses. There could be IP, IPX, AppleTalk, or any other layer 3 protocol above layer 2. The access point doesn't know or care.
Just realized i was listening to this video driving over that bridge tonight haha